u
S
fe 006
i as, 2
L
d re
u
o
o
r
r
ty Su
i ey &
l
a
u all
Qyne V
n
a
gA
l
n
i
s
f I nd
:
y
e
rv
T
Social Economy and Sustainability Research Network
Partenariat sur l’économie sociale et la durabilité
Bridging, Bonding, and Building / Renforcement des liens et des capacités
Quality of Island Life Survey:
Tyne Valley & Surrounding Areas, 2006
Dolores LeVangie, Irené Novaczek, Stacey Enman,
Rachel MacKay & Katherine Clough
!
"
#$
%
%
%'
( ) * + -./ 1
'3
3 /4 /
'
3 /+.")
$
*
5
( /
'
3 /+ . ")
$ 3 3
33 #
4 3 7 5 (
.)
$+
/894
:
)4
+/
/-3.
5)))535;
3;
Quality of Island Life Survey
Table of Contents
Summary
1
Introduction
2
The Quality of Island Life Co-operative and Community Accounts
2
Quality of Life, and Indicators
4
Tyne Valley and Surrounding Area
5
Quality of Life in Tyne Valley Area, 1996: the Atlas of Canada Data
7
QoL as Defined in the Atlas of Canada
7
Indicators of Economic Environment
8
Indicators of Physical Environment
9
Indicators of Social Environment
10
Quality of Life in the Tyne Valley Area, 2006
13
Research Methods
13
Factors Contributing to Quality of Life
15
The Change of Perceptions with Gender and Age
18
Living in the Tyne Valley Area
20
How has the Tyne Valley Area Changed for the Better?
22
How has the Tyne Valley Area Changed for the Worse?
23
Quality of Life Indicators for Prince Edward Island
25
Comparison of Atlas of Canada Indicators with Locally Generated Indicators 25
Conclusions
References
27
28
1
Quality of Island Life Survey
2
Quality of Island Life Survey
Summary
3+
*
<
*
=
#
%')
4
>
?
+
+5(
*
))+
3@
3
3
+
B+%')@
3
)
4
)))
5
( + +
3
33 7
% ') C 4 3
+
334
*3$5
337
+
$
+
D
%')4
35
3
3
+?++D
3
5
)D
3
E
FD+
(8
G@)
3D
)
33
)
@))
+
5
(
#
+
3Community Social
Wellbeing+3
5(
34
3
4
334
+
5+)$
4Community Social Wellbeing)
357
3
)
Community Services and Infrastructure5H
+
3
3)3
4
)
4+ Community
Social Wellbeing 3
5I3
)*45H
33
+
B
3
5
:
)
33
%'
5(
+
3
33
)
3
+5(
)
)+5
3+
337
4
)
)
33
$
3$4
$
)
)5
3
Quality of Island Life Survey
Figure 1. Tyne Valley and surrounding communities, Prince Edward Island.
4
Quality of Island Life Survey
Introduction
The Quality of Island Life Co-operative and Community Accounts
( *
<
*
= *4 %
'))
+
%')<%'=
333
33
I
5)+
3
)
3
3
%')4343
5
J3
)
3
$
3+J)
)
)+
4
$
4
344
3
4+
335
K
)+
3?
L7J)
)L
(
+)
+?
)+
33
3$+44
)
3
?
+
) + 4 3 5 K 3
) + %'4 3 + + *
3 3 + 3 4
35
K+
34
)
(8<HM=
33
G5
33D)
+)3
<
=
)
)3
5(
)
+/'34
*
(85
3 3
4 ) )
+
337
%'
335
337
3$
3
5 ( 3
+%'
337
)+")
+
33
7
4)
N
33 5(7
+
3<H=
#+
*
*)+5(4)+
3$4
+
)
4
5
(
+
337
%')B+N7
O
%'
*
5/44
P4%'
3
3
337
5
5
Quality of Island Life Survey
(
(8
33)
33
3
4
)
3
5(
)
337
+
+
*3$
33
(85
Figure 2. Domains of well being in Newfoundland and Labrador’s Community Accounts
Source: http://www.communityaccounts.ca /communityaccounts/onlinedata/default.asp
Well-Being
Household
Spending
Income
Social
Health
Labour
Market
Production
Demographics
Education
Resource/
Wealth
Environment
3
) + 3 + %' 33 7
3
+3
+
4++
+
)
)5(
+4
34)D
3
)
3)5(
3
EF4)
)
JC
)?+
4
43
C
3
/<:
4Q=5
Quality of Life, and Indicators
KD
34
33
)L
3)
3
<
=4
)
)
%')L(
?$)
?
5
)
)
B
%'
+
4
3
)
3
+
4+
3
335
6
Quality of Island Life Survey
<
=+$
MG5++
+
)
3
53+/)
<GG=))$+
E
B3
+
3+574
$
4)3
+
F5+3
3+343
E
F
3
B3
3)+543
3
)
3
5.
ED
)+F
<4NMMQ=+
3
3
335
7D4
4+3?
E
3
R
3
+3
U
)
3)
)3$
F<3+/)4GW=5(
3
O
"
%
<O"%=
O
3%
<O%=4)3
3 5 ( 3 4 3 + 3
3
34
D34E
)
4
+
+
4
*I
F<3+/)4GQ=5X
43
+
)+
)O"%4
E+
)4
4F<3+/)4
GQ=5'
)
)
4O%+
)
+
)+57
O%
3+
3+
)
43
E
4D3
)
F<$47+4/33(
3
4GW=5
(3
4$
4+$
MG
3
E
3
)
3
B
3
F</4Q=5(3++
5 (
+ 34 E
R ) 3
3
33+
33
F<$4=5
7
<W= % ') J 3 ) D
+
3
35(
%'4
E
+4)+
4
D3F5(
%'4
34
U $
) + 3 ) 34 )+4 %'J
+4 335 ( +3
4
333
4 $
) 35 3 3
3
?
+
+
35<
4W=
7
Quality of Island Life Survey
7 $ $4 %
. ")
$ <%."=4 M5X
E+
$
)
+
++F<
4
=5%.">
D3
3
"
73M5
K
3+
<
=
%'5:)
3$
+
3
4)))
B)
3
%')4
3)
35
3
3
3
334
337
)
+3
3
*3$4
)+3
5
Tyne Valley and Surrounding Area
(8
K%
%')5)+
MW <H5 M=4 ) D H "
4 "
34 /4 8
K%
-5X>
M:-4'3
4%
O
:
5(3
33
3
4'5
)3
+'4)
$
334
+)
5
(84
33
MW
4)$
)E(FMQ+
3+
(
.4)
5+3$
)
(8MPGPE)++%
-MP4(8
+3
5()
D34
43+3
F<H
H-
3455=5
) + MG MW 3+ QNP4 )
3 WM )
(8</55=5(4G4
MW QM5 ( MN*Y <H
%' 4 55=4 +
EB@
33
4
+@
@@
@
@
3@
F<H
%'
455Y=5(8++E
3$3
+ 3$+ 3
3F <(
3 %'4 =5 ) 3
4<-
4Q=5
8
Quality of Island Life Survey
Quality of Life in Tyne Valley Area, 1996: the Atlas of
Canada Data
(7
<Y=3Quality of Life
+)+@
B)+E
))
+
3F4
4
3
35MG7
34
3#
3
35X
3
<
=)4)E
3
3
JF4)3
<7
4
Y=5(7
#
I
I
4
3
335
H
37
4)
)(8<
MWD
DH
"
=3MG
)
'
3'
3@%
'
3@ /
'
35 H
4 ) + )
35(7
<Y=
34+
3
4
3
3
<(+M=5(8
3+
E-F
X
5
(
3)3+
3+
5(3
+
@4
B
@43
)
5
)+)
<B4
45=4)
B3
+
B+5($
)
)(8
3
5
Table 1: Domains that were combined to develop the overall Quality of Life rating for Tyne
Valley, 1996
Household Finances
Accessibility to Services
Environmental Quality
Employment/Paid Work
Education
Social Stability
Housing
Participation in Democratic
Processes
Social Opportunity & Mobility
Access to Health Resources
Leisure and Recreation
9
Quality of Island Life Survey
Indicators of Economic Environment
7
7
<Y=4
3
3Erepresents the external conditions
)
34
-
H'3
34
)
3+
3
5H
-
H
'3
3)
?
3
3(8<(+=5H
4)
$
<B4
4=4
)(8B5
Table 2. Domains and indicators included in Economic Environment
Domain: Household Finances
Type of
indicator
Range of
values
Rank
7
)J3>
3
inverse
ZWN*ZYM
2nd
%
3
3
3
3
inverse
5P[*P5[
W
.
)
3
3
inverse
5M*5P
M
%
)
33
inverse
MQ5N[*5P[
Y
.
)
$43
)
$43
inverse
M5P*M
Y
93
3
inverse
5M*MY5Y[
W
73
3
3
ZG4NG*ZMG4PNM
N
Domain: Employment/Paid Work
X4(8)EF
3
357)
3
+
4
)$+
+33
3
3
?
33
34)
+
3+
)J
5X
4
?
33 3 + ) 3 @
3
3
@
3
3
3<
+
+7=
B3
5
10
Quality of Island Life Survey
Indicators of Physical Environment
%
34B7
4
3
4
4
3?
<(+W=5
Table 3. Domains and Indicators included in Physical Environment
Type of
Indicator
Range of
values
% ?
3>
inverse
+
73+
3
inverse
5Y*5Y
2nd
% 3 ) )J 3>
3<
=
+
?
W
3
inverse
M5MP*MM5W
M
Type of
Indicator
Range of
values
Rank
inverse
5WQ$3*
WM5YG$3
Y
)?3>
inverse
5M*5Q
M
7 ? 3 33
inverse
G5M*GGQN5GG
M
3
inverse
*5NQ
M
3
inverse
\
data
Domain: Housing
Domain: Access to Services
3
+
Rank
Domain: Environmental Quality
Domain: Personal Security
( 8 M 3 4 ) D
D3
5H
34)
33
) 3 3 >
D ?5 "
4 )4 '
3
)%')3D
<K54G=5%)
?
5
11
Quality of Island Life Survey
Indicators of Social Environment
/
3B7ED
)
)
33F
3
@
3
+@ 3
@ +@ @ 5(
3$
3++
)<(+Y=5
Table 4. Domains and Indicators included in Social Environment.
Domain: Leisure and Recreation
Type
Range of values
Rank
"3+ * 33 5WN*5GPP
W
"3+
+
5MP*M5Q
M
.
33
3
33
3
NP5WG*QN5MY
W
)
$
G5QW*PY5PG
2nd
H3
)
$
GQ5Y*P5
M
G5W[*Q5NN[
2nd
.
[
)
[
N5W*M5Q
W
[
3
B
Q5PN[]M[
M
[*5MW[
M
Domain: Social Opportunity and Mobility
Domain: Participation in Democratic Processes
% MQ
Domain: Social Stability
[
I
inverse
B
12
Quality of Island Life Survey
Domain: Education
Type
Range of values
Rank
.
);
O
M5*5W
Y
"3+
*5P
N
"3+
3
M5QN*W5QNG
2nd
Domain: Access to Health Resources
Tyne Valle) 3
35 ( 3
3+
33 4 +5 7
3
4
D
5(
3
+43
3(8
N
3>
)
35$3
%')4(8
3
5K
3
?4)
33
34+
+
B3
3
3
5.)
+
5
)
4))
)
(8B
G4)
)
D
*
)3
35K)7
3
4
)B5
13
Quality of Island Life Survey
Quality of Life in the Tyne Valley Area, 2006
Research Methods
))
3
33
MW4
334
)?
4
)
+
3
334
3
)
+
357)
3#3)4
3
)
3)
MW4
)+
7
++
5
7+
+)
+
MW
++)
>5(
3
34
)3
35
%
(8
4
4)
>53
4
$3%')
+
$)B
33
MW57#3
)
+
4
)
3
)
)+
4$)
$
5/
3
<)
M
MY=
+)
+
(85()
3)?
))
+3
34
$
)5
'I
)3
3+
3)
3
5 ) # ) + )
+ I
5X
%'4)3
333
34)
3
+3
)
3+3
+
3
33<"
#$54=57
4)D)
)
)
)
3
3
5
:)
4))+
3333+
>5
)NQ<(+N=43
+
P[
MW54
4
3
\ 35 7
I
) 34 D H
"
J
33
3
\4
34I
)
5%3
3(+G5
14
Quality of Island Life Survey
Table 5. Number of male and female participants, by age group.
Age group
H3
Total
MP]W
2
MP
20
Y]N
M
MY
Y
60 years and older
Y
MW
(
3+
MG
YM
NQ
Table 6. Place of residence of survey participants.
Village
Number of participants
Tyne Valley
22
:-
P
"
3
P
/
6
8
K
N
%
-
Y
'3
2
Poplar Grove
M
:
M
15
Quality of Island Life Survey
7
+
)
3
4
)$
?
5 % ) ?
4 3
3
3+
5
()$
3
3
4
+44
3
335X?
)E)F
4
)M573
M]W43)
3
*
5
(
)
?
M=K
3
3
L
=K
3
+
33L
W=%D
)
$
33
+
)
L
T
$
?
)
)
3)
3
(85()
)
)
?
$5
))
$+
33
5
')
?
EK
3
LF)
5
%
33I
+
$5H
3NQ
4W
)
5X4
4
3
N5GI
5K
3
+3
<N5=
3
3
<N5M=5
4 I + <
= ) B5 ( B4)))34)D
I)5H
D34
3
?)3
5X
?4
357)+3
5(D
3
4
34
?))
3)3
5(?
++
R3
3
5-
)43
)
D?5
($
3)
3+)3
))3
=
++
4
+=
I3
5
.
?
EK
3
+
33LF)
#
3
)3+
5K
)
3
3
)
)
)
334
)D(8
+
B+5
16
Quality of Island Life Survey
()
?
+
)) +
)
33 )
334
)
+)+
3
3B+
(85
Factors Contributing to Quality of Life
?
EK
3
3
LF4
W)4
4
I
5(
)
D
3 Personal Wellbeing@ Positive Social Relations@ Physical Environment <D +
3=@ Community Social Wellbeing@ Livelihood/Cost of Living@ Community Services
and Infrastructure5(
34?4
3+
)5
HW
3
$
35H
+
Community Social Wellbeing ) 3
3
?4 3$ W[
5
Personal Wellbeing, Community Services and Infrastructure and Positive Social Relations ) 3
)3
?4)
Livelihood/Cost of Living
and Physical Environment)3
3
5
Figure 3 - Frequencies with which factors belonging to each domain were mentioned.
Community Social Wellbeing
95
Personal Wellbeing
72
Community Services and Infrastructure
60
Positive Social Relations
59
Employment
23
Physical Environment
13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
17
Quality of Island Life Survey
M=Community Social Wellbeing5(
3
+
3335(D
)3
N34
?5
Knowing everyone / Community attachment / Sense of belonging – 25
Safety / Security – 24
Calmness / Quiet /Tranquility / Peacefulness – 18
Mutual support / Community involvement/ volunteerism – 11
Community pride / Spirit / Celebrations and communal activities – 9
A pleasant place to live / Happiness in community – 8
=Personal Wellbeing.(
3%
K+4
4
43
443
+
)
)
35(
3
)5(
)3
Q35
Enjoyment of everyday living / Comfort / Contentment / Thankfulness – 31
Health – 12
Free time / freedom – 11
Hobbies / Activities – 5
Privacy / Solitude – 5
Mental health / Emotional health/ Spirituality – 3
Accomplishing personal goals –3
Job satisfaction – 2
W= Community Services & Infrastructure5 ( 3 + 3*3
@
34
33+
+5
(
)3
G35
! infrastructure, gas station, bank, drug store, shopping) – 22
Health services – 17
Aesthetic infrastructure (renovations, walking area) – 6
Community organizations’ programs – 6
Roads – 4
Educational facilities (schools, daycare) – 3
Entertainment – 1
Proximity to urban centre services – 1
18
Quality of Island Life Survey
Y=Positive Social Relations5 (
3
3
)34
3+
+
D35()
)3
N35
Being close to family – 34
Spending time with friends – 25
N=Livelihood / Cost of Living5 (
3J
3
5(
)3
W35
Financial stability / Adequate income – 16
Employment / Labour market – 6
Low cost of living – 1
6) Physical Environment <D+
3=5
I
3 3 E+B
F ( 84 B
D+
354
3+5()
)3
MW35
Beautiful surroundings (rural setting, scenic nature, beaches) – 7
Healthy environment ( air & water quality) – 6
The Change of Perceptions with Gender and Age
K ) ) ) ? 3 ) 3
+ 3 3
)
34+
I
5
O3
3<YM=3<MG=3
3
344)
43
R
3
5
)
)3
I 3 35 ( 3
+3
+5
K
3
3 3
3
4)
3
)3
++
3)
35-
)4
I3
?))
)3
4))
+
<(+Q=5H
)
3Personal Wellbeing
and Community Social Wellbeing
3 +
3 3
4 + 3 3
33)+5($
)
34Community Services
and Infrastructure and Positive Social Relations,)4))
33
3
Positive Social Relations.:
3
Livelihood / Cost of Living and Physical Environment
3?
35
3
)
34)
3)$3
3
19
Quality of Island Life Survey
5X)
33
34>
+
4
334
4
34
R
33
334
5)3
)
$)
3
3
3
35(
D3
+)3+35
%
J
4+
4)
D
I
+
<(+P=5
H
4
3Community Social Wellbeing$B5(?))
Community Services and Infrastructure)3
)
4)Personal Wellbeing and Positive Social Relations)3
33
3
+
5Physical Environment
)3
+
@)3
3$3
5(3#
)
B4+)
+D3
5
4
)3
$
D3
3
@
3
++)@)
43
343
)5
Table 7: Emphasis placed on various Quality of Life domains by male and female participants.
Rank indicates the relative frequency with which factors in each domain were mentioned.
20
Domain Rank (by
frequency)
Males (% of all data points
provided by males)
Females (% of all data points
provided by females)
Mst
33
)+<G[=
33
)+<WM[=
2nd
%
)+<G[=
%
)+<[=
Wrd
33`
<M[=
%
<[=
Y
%
<MN[=
33`
<M[=
N
;
<[=
;
<Q[=
6
%'
3<G[=
%'
3<W[=
Quality of Island Life Survey
Rank indicates the relative frequency with which factors in each domain were mentioned.
Domain
Rank
Age 18-39
Age 40-59
Age 60+
Mst
33
)+
<W[=
33
)+<P[=
33
)+<WM[=
2nd
%
<N[=
33
33
<W[=
Wrd
%
)+<N[=
%
)+
<[=
%
)+<M[=
Y
33
<M[=
%
<MY[=
%
<MN[=
N
;
<P[=
;
<Q[=
;
<Q[=
6
%'
3<5P[=
%'
3
<G[=
%'
3<N[=
Living in the Tyne Valley Area
7
)43
Y
4)))$)
3
+
335(?
)
4
3+
)4)B?
5)
B ) 3 <(+ =5 (4 )
(8
3))
+
5H3
4
3
)
B
+
33/
K+5(8)
+4)
$)+
5.
++
4I
53
%
K+4
D
5
3)
)
3
)$4)3
Community
Services and Infrastructure and Physical Environment )
+)(8
+
5(+3
33
3
Community Services and
Infrastructure)33+
5+JPhysical Environment
+5%
3
Livelihood / Cost of Living
+)4)
)
)3
33+5
21
Quality of Island Life Survey
Table 9: Answers to “What do you value the most about living in Tyne Valley or a surrounding
community?”, compiled by domain and ranked according to how frequently traits belonging
in each Quality of Life domain were mentioned.
.$
3
[
+
3
M
33/
K+
YP5Q[
2nd
33/`
M5G[
W
%'
3
MW5P[
Y
%
/
.
5P[
N
%
K+
G5Q[
G
;
M5W[
Table 10: Rank of attributes of Tyne Valley and area that were valued by male and female participants
22
Domain Rank
% of all data points provided by males
% of all data points provided by
females
Mst
33/
K+<YY5G[=
33/
K+<N[=
2nd
33/`
<W5[=
33/`
<MP5N[=
Wrd
%'
3<MG5M[=
%'
3<MW5M[=
Y
%
/
.
<P5[=
%
/
.
<M5M[=
N
%
K+<N5Y[=
%
K+<Q5M[=
6
;
<M5P[=
;
<M5[=
Quality of Island Life Survey
-)
I+))+33
?
<(+M=4
+3
4)
3I<(+MM=5H
D34 Community
Social Wellbeing)3
3
+
4+)
3
4
)
3
3 33+) $
5 Positive Social Relations)3
$
4)3
)
4
Community Services and Infrastructure3
3
?
5
7+B
Physical Environment)3
3
3*5
Livelihood )
3
+
5
Community Social Wellbeing )3>
4
43
+
(84
33+
+
+
5
Table 11: Rank of attributes of Tyne Valley and area that were valued by participants in each
age group.
Domain Rank
(by frequency)
Age 18-39
Age 40-59
Age 60+
Mst
33/
K+
<GY5W[=
33/
K+<WQ5[=
33/
K+<Y5G[=
2nd
%
/
.
<M5Q[=
33/
<N5G[=
33/
<Q5P[=
Wrd
%'
3<P5W[=
%'
3
<M5P[=
%'
3
<MW5[=
Y
33/
<P5W[=
%
/
.
<5W[=
%
/
.
<5W[=
N
%
K+<Q5M[=
%
K+
<Q5[=
%
K+<N5N[=
6
;
<M5[=
;
<M5[=
;
<M5P[=
How has the Tyne Valley Area Changed for the Better?
.
MG
+
)
33
+57B)
3)
23
Quality of Island Life Survey
B5(
)+
3
)
+
)<H5Y=5"
Social Relations4))
Personal Wellbeing,
Physical Environment or Livelihood / Cost of Living.
Community Services and Infrastructure, ) 3 B 3 Community Social
Wellbeing.
(
3
34Community Services and Infrastructure4)
)++
$
)
D
)D (8 3$ +
5 .
)4 +B
4 ) 3
3
5
( ))$ @ +@ 34$4+
)4b%B5X?+>
33))
+
3
+
I <+$4+=5 ")
)
3
5
Figure 4. The distribution of data concerning positive changes in the community, among
Quality of Life domains.
Community Services and Infrastructure
86%
Community Social Wellbeing
10%
Employment
2%
Physical Environment
1%
Personal Wellbeing
1%
Positive Social Relations
0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
( B ommunity Social Wellbeing
5(
3
33+
33@
)
3
33I@
335
How has the Tyne Valley Area Changed for the Worse?
.
M)+
)
33
)
5HN
))
3
)5
"
)
Personal Wellbeing, Positive Social Relations or Physical Environment5(
3>
)
Community Services and Infrastructure
5(
24
Quality of Island Life Survey
3
$+
Community Social Wellbeing
4Livelihood / Cost of Living5
( 3 Community Services and Infrastructure 3 ) +4@
3333
@
3@$
@
5
/
3 + 3 Community Social
Wellbeing
(8
5)
)3
3
4
E
3
(8F5"
3)
3
5 /
3 ) +
$ @
)5
Figure 5. Distribution of data concerning negative changes in the community.
X
)+)
))
3
4)
)
$
335H
3
4
33
)
3
)
35
(
+
>
+
(8)
?4
3
5
25
Quality of Island Life Survey
Quality of Life Indicators for Prince Edward Island
Comparison of Atlas of Canada Indicators with Locally Generated Indicators
7
7
<Y=
MG4(8
5X
(8>
+
4+4
3)I
)
34
3
c B + 35 K$ 3 )
43
Community
Social Wellbeing.7
$
3Personal Wellbeing5H
related to Community Services and Infrastructure and Positive Social Relations)I
$5
7
4
3
)3+4)
+
3/5(
3
5 -
)4 $ 3
3
3
4
335
(
3
+7
)=Economic Environment4+=Physical
Environment4 = Social Environment5 ( 3 )4
4=
B3
3;)
$@+=
4+
4
3 ? @ = 3
+ <B 3
33
3=4
4
3
4
4
+4
5/
3
)B+(
8
+
@
)
7
)
3
+
5(
3
7
%'4
3
3)
)
3
35
+
3
>c++
)3
$3
++
4D3
+35
H
3
>4
3
3
(8) Community Social Wellbeing, Personal Wellbeing, Positive Social Relations,
Community Service and Infrastructure, Livelihood / Cost of Living and Physical Environment5 (
3 3 3
$ 3
) Community
Social Wellbeing. (
3434
+
34$
)
3333+
4
333
5
(
3
3)+/4
26
Quality of Island Life Survey
B3
7
+
Y573
Q
7
4
)
3
E
F<
3=)
E/
+F
<[
3
I
N
=
33/
K+B+
(85
H
f
$ <=4
3
5-
3
$
))
3
)
5
3Community Social Wellbeing3
(84)
MW
EF3
7
J
3)5
Limitations of this Study
7
+
4
3(8B
+
)
D
*
4
35(
3$
3
3
+3
35:
$
+
4
)4
3
) 3 ) 3
* +
5
(
J3
)34
?
33
5K
*
**3
43
)
4
3
35X3
)
33
D
)
3
%')57
D34-
<Q=
3)
(8
5K)
3
cB+
++
c
3
+ )+
335
4+)
B + 5 )4 )4 3
3
)
)$) $ (85( 4 $ +
3
)4
>
+4
$)
4+
3
+$
B3
D
?$5(43)33+
5
27
Quality of Island Life Survey
Recommendations
:$
+
3)
I
3
)
+
/4)
33+
3$
+
+
%'J
337
C)
)
33
3
4
3
3
3
35(
B
+
B3+
3
4
335/
4
3
3
+3
334 **3 $5H4
+
I
3+
)$
+33
34
337
5 337
+
*3$
3
+ 3
+
33+5 +
+
4)
+4I
33))
3
5
Conclusions
K3
33
%'4
)
3
3
Community Social Wellbeing +
5H
3+/)<GG=4
33*
E555
I
33)5'
3I
3
43
)
3
33
3
5F
()$B
4))
+
3
3$
+
33
3$5:
33
(8
4
)+
#3
)3
3
3
)
)
)3
)5
H
)
334%'
E3)4)
)
)
+$%')5554
3
3
3
334
*
4J
*F<H)*-
4WWN=5
(
(83
5
28
Quality of Island Life Survey
References
7
<Y=5Quality of Life5.
3;;555;;;3;
;X;M
:
4O5<Q=5E'
K
FO5:
<'5=4A World
of Islands. )773
/4GMQ5
3+45/)45<G=5E
%
7O
33*
* 73F5 5 f5 /4 5 .# 5 /) <'5=4 Community Quality-of-Life
Indicators: Best Cases II<5GQ]W=5
/5.
3;;)))5$5
3;
;GQYQ;
H
%'<55=5%
B] Community of Tyne Valley.
.
3;;)))5
55;
B;5
H
H-
3<5=5Ferguson’s O’Leary and Tyne Valley Funeral Homes.
.
3;;)))5
h5
3;+
j
j53
H)*-
4f5<W=5Island wise: lessons in living from the islands of the world<Mst5=5
")1
$:
):
$5
-
4 5 <Q=5 !
viewscapes.
)4%'74/49
%')5
$4"547+4/54/334754(
3
4/5<G=5The unhappy planet index: An index
of human wellbeing and environmental impact5.
3")'
3H
4;;
)))5D5
;
)
53
4/5<N=5E
F5755
<5=4Citation Classics from Social
Indicators Research<5MMQ*MWG=5
/5.
3;;)))5$5
3;
;>MQN$W;
45<=5Review of Canadian Quality of Life Survey Data5.
3
%
.")
$4;;)))55
;
53L
kPM`k
$4f5<=5Quality of Life in Canada: A Citizens’ Report Card - Background Report5.
3%
.")
$4;;)))55
;
53L
kYQ`k
29
Quality of Island Life Survey
"
#$454H#$4/54.
)4/544f5<=5At the Table: Exploring Women’s
Roles in the PEI Fishery5 ) /4 9 % ')
4WP5
/475<=5A Survey of Indicators of Economic and Social Wellbeing5.
3
%
.")
$4;;)))55
;
53L
kPN`k
/ 4 <55=5 Population and Dwelling Counts, for Canada and Census Subdivisions
(Municipalities), 2001 and 1996 Censuses. ;;)))M55;;M;
;
;
);(+*/*"53L(kM`/.kG`/.-kM
(
3%'<=5 Tyne Valley Route Description5 .
3 ;;)))5
35
3;
*;**
K 54 ' K5.4 f O4 O
<G=5 73+ %')45Pest Manag Sci.G<=mMG*WG5
30