CPT CORNER Dog-bite stats warrant awareness of wound-repair coding “CPT Corner” is designed to provide general information, available at the time of publication, regarding various coding, billing and claims issues of interest to plastic surgeons. ASPS is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on the information contained in this column. by j. eric lomax, md N ational Dog Bite Prevention Week is May 17-21. The unfortunate need for such a week is evidenced by the statistic that 4.5 million people in the United States are bitten by dogs each year. Twenty percent of those bites require medical attention – 27,000 of which require reconstructive surgery, according to the American Veterinary Medical Association. Roughly 1,000 people in this country require emergency care for a dog bite each day, according to dogsbite.org. This installment of CPT Corner reviews the steps necessary to correctly report laceration-repair codes (though not the more complicated repairs such as skin grafting or flaps). The first step is to determine which one of the three repair types was used. Simple repair: Wounds that require simple one-layer closure or suturing, whether skin sutures or buried sutures. It’s used for superficial wounds of the epidermis, dermis or subcutaneous tissue without significant involvement of deeper structures. Intermediate repair: Wounds that require closure of one or more of the deeper layers of subcutaneous tissue and superficial (non-muscle) fascia, in addition to the skin closure described under simple repair or a 16 April/May 2015 Plastic Surgery News single-layer closure of heavily contaminated wounds requiring extensive cleaning or removal of particulate matter, is included under intermediate repair – including copious or extensive irrigation and removal of dirt, glass shards, oil or grease. Complex repair: Wounds requiring layered closures and additional treatment such as, but not limited to, extensive undermining and debridement of wounds prior to closure. The second step is to identify the repair site or sites. CPT codes are categorized by body site, so it’s important to review the code descriptors carefully. Remember there are subtle differences in the body site descriptions between the simple, intermediate and complex repair code sets. The third step is to identify the length of the repaired wound in centimeters. Code selection depends on the length of the repair and CPT code descriptors include the length of the repair, in centimeters. If the wound is documented in inches instead of centimeters, follow these conversion tips: ■ 1 inch = 2.5 cm ■ 1 inch to 2 15/16 inches = 2.6 to 7.5 cm ■ 3 to 4 15/16 inches = 7.6 to 12.5 cm ■ 4 15/16 to 7 7/8 inches = 12.6 to 20.0 cm ■ 7 15/16 to 11 13/16 inches = 20.1 to 30.0 cm ■ 11 14/16 inches = over 30.0 cm Wound location, complexity and length are all essential for proper coding. If not documented by the provider, the coding may default to the lowest level for the category listed – or be denied completely. The final step requires answering the following questions: 1. Were the wounds in the same anatomical code group or multiple code groups? mented 4.2 cm laceration to the scalp undergoes a documented simple repair of the nose laceration and a documented intermediate repair of the scalp wound. 2. Were the wounds repaired using the same technique (simple, intermediate or complex repair)? Accurate coding 12032 Repair, intermediate wounds of scalp; 2.6 to 7.5 cm For wounds in the same anatomical code group and closed by the same technique, the lengths of the wounds repaired should be added together and only one CPT code assigned. Example: A patient with a documented 2.5 cm laceration on the face and a 2.5 cm laceration of the ear are both repaired with a documented simple closure. The face and ear are in the same CPT code group (see coding tables, below), so the repair lengths should be combined. Simple repair of superficial wounds of face, ears, eyelids, nose lips and/or mucous membranes is group 120XX. In this example, the combined length of all repairs is 5.0 cm, so code 12013 – 2.6 cm to 7.5 cm – is assigned. For repairs from different anatomic sites or different classifications (simple, intermediate and complex), it’s appropriate to report codes for each repair. Example: A patient with a documented 2.5 cm laceration on the nose and a docu- 12011 Simple repair, wounds of nose; 2.5 cm or less Remember to sequence the most complicated repair as the primary procedure, followed by the lesser complicated repair(s). It’s also important to note that wound closures utilizing adhesive strips, such as Steri-Strips or butterfly bandages, as the sole repair material, are not simple repairs. They should be coded using the appropriate E/M code. Debridement performed in conjunction with wound repairs are not coded separately unless the documentation specifies that gross contamination requires prolonged cleansing or when appreciable amounts of devitalized tissue is removed. Remember accurate coding will reduce billing errors. A simple $10 coding error per patient would have a cumulative cost to the health-care system of more than $8 million per year. PSN
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz