NSDD 249

~~-
~t:-SSIFIED
SYSTEM II
90744
WASMIH01' 0 N
NATIONAL SECURITY.
OIRECTI VE HUMS
1986
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCT?
IATING ROUND (S)
Tb• attached instruction• aupplement exiatin9 ~idance for the
current round of the Ruclear and Space Talta (NST) which be9an on
September 18, 1986, in Geneva. Tbey ••t forth in detail the
propoeale ude to General Secretary Gorbachev cluring ey .... etln9
with blm in Reykjavik, Iceland, IUld provide quiclance for building
on the a9ree1Mnta we reached there.
(S)
Att,ac hmenta
1. overall Ina
na of Octobe 21 1986 (S)
2. STllRT Ina
of october
ISi
3. Defenae and pace Inatructione o
tober 21, 1986
4. IllP Inatructiona of October 22, 1986 (SI
s. overall Inatructiona of October 27, 1986 (SI
6. Defenae e"4 Space Inotructiona of October 27, 1986
(S)
(SI
3
YEAR PERIOD, WITK ALL OF
ELIMINATED, EITHER SIDE
D&f£NSES.
· - · '.- VI
C. SOVIET PROPOS>.
UNITED STATES WOU
-.. EXERCISE tl!EIR-tl<I
TREAT'!, WHICH IS OF
PERIOD STRICTLY TO OBS
TESTING IN SPACE OF AL
DEFENSE IS PROHIBITED,
CONDUCTED IN LAJ!ORA'IORIES.
UNCLASSIFIED
IVE BALLISTIC. Ml
BE FREE TO D
THE
"'
TO
TK£ ABM
!NO THAT
TK£
SILE
RESEARCH
ING
WITHIN THE FIRST . Fllll: YEARS
or THE TEN•YEAR PERIOD (AND THUS THROUGH 1991), Tll£
STRATEGIC OFn:NSIVJ: AlUIS OF T1IE two SIDES SllALL BE
REDllCED BY SO PERCENT. DURING ta FOLLOWING Fllll: YEARS
or TllAT PE:RIOD, THE REMAINING so PERCENT OF THE 'iWO
SIDES' STRATEGIC OFl'ENSIVE ARMS S1IAt.L BB l\EDUCED. n!llS·
BY TllE £ND OF 1996, THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE AIUCS or THE
USSR AND THE UNITED STATES ILL RAVE BEEN
LY
ELIMINATED.
D. SECOND US PROPOSA
BER 12 .
R AND THE
UNITED STATES UNDER
EN YEARS
ERCISE
THEIR EXISTING Rl
RAWAL
TREAT'!,
WHICH IS OF UNLIM
H, AND
PERIOD
STRICTLY to OBSERVE
ROVISIONS
NTINUING
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMEHr
TING, WB1C8
RM!TTED
BY THE ABM TREAT'!. WI
FIRST FIVE
OF THE
TEN-YEAR PERIOD (AHO
OUOB 1991),
RATEC!C
OFFENSIVE AAMS OF t a
ES S1IAt.L BE
aY 50
PERCENT. DU!t!NG TllE
FIVE YEARS
T
PERIOO, ALL REMAINING
V'E BALLISTIC
s or
TllE TWO SIDES SHALL BE REDUCED. THUS BY nu: END or
1996, ALL OFFEllSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES OF TSE USSR AND
THE UNITED STATES· NILL HAVE BEEN TOTALLY ELIMINATED. AT
TllE END OF THE TEN• YEAR PERIOD, EITHER SID& ·COULD DEPLOY
DEFENSES IF I T SO CROSE UNLESS TH& PARTIES AGREE
OTHERWISE.
0
vu: IS
DITIONAL
NO CROUP
S.
CUIDAllCK ON THE US PllO
UNDER CONSIDERATION IN W
ANALYT !CAL WOltlt. IN
SHOULD AVOW DISCUSS!
TSE US PROPOSALS.
IF 21/ESTIONED
REYX.JAVIK, THE US
THE US INTENDS TO BUI
ACCQllPLISBllENTS OF THE
US WILL llE llAXING A P
ACCOMPLISllME!aS SHORTL
6.
or
US PRO
CROUP S
TSE l'OSlTIVE
AVIK MEETING,
IN GENEVA BA
ASKED WBETllE
•
~
--
ADOITIONAL COIOllTME
DISCUSSEO IN ltEYl<.1A
NECOTI ATING GROUP
CLEAR BY TllE TERMS
ADDITIONAL CO!IMI
BY THE US WERE STRICTL
REACHIN<l A NVTUALLY SA
SALS
IONS. THE
IT WAS
SCllEDULE OF IU!DUCTIONS
R£DUCTIONS IN THE STRA
FFEllSIVE FO
BOTH
SIDES TO EQUAL LEVELS BY 1991 AND TOTAL ELllllNATION OF
THE OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES OF BOTH SIDES BY 1996. SHULTZ
• • END
or
CABLE ••
SYSTEM II
90744
ATTACHMENT 4
..
..
OP IMMED
DE RUD!C 11883 296134
0 231335Z OCT 86 .ZFF
FM SECSTATE HASllDC
TO USDEL HST CENEV
S E C R E T STATE 33
IMMEDIATE
EC T ED C 0
l MISSINC)
E.O. 12356' DECL' 0.\DR
TAcs, PARM, HST, INF
SUBJECT, ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR THE INF NECOTIATINC CROUP
C 0 R R
A) STAl'E 290224 (8) STATE 12553
2
•
1.
SECRET -
2. FOLLOWING IS ADDI
NEGOTll\TIN<:l GROUP I
·
.F
OCTOBER 11-12 R£YK
GUIDANCE FOR
I . R£FLECT
ING. llAS
EVALUATE HOii BEST. TO 8
OF THAT MEETINC AND Ill
SHORTLY, INCLUDING Oii!
/\LL OFFENSIVE BAI.LISTI
I\) REMAINS VALID. EXCE
ON POSITI
VIDE llDDITIO
THE CONCEP
l tllS. PREVIO
IFIED BELOW
LISHMENTS
DANCE
LIMINl\TING
DANCE (REF
SSIONS IN
NTlllUES TO
3.
/\GREED APPROACH . BASED ON REYKJAVIK DISCUSSION, THE
U. S. IS READY TO ACCEPT- - AND llE UNDERSTAND THE SOVIETS CAii
ACCEPT--AN LlllNF CEILING OF 100 llAIU!EADS ON EACH SIDE,
MADE UP OF ZERO lllllllttADS ON EACH SIDE IN EUROPE AND 100
11.uu!EADS ON EACH SIDll OUTSIDE OF EU'ROPE IN SOVIET AS!/\ ON
THE SOVIET SIDE, AND IN THE U.S. ON THE U.S. SIDE.
N'EGOTIATIN<:l GROUP SHOULD CONFllU! SOVIET ACCEPTANCE OF THIS
APPROACH.
THE U.S. BELIEVES••
ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE··
SHOULD BE SPECIFIC V
( 1) I\ COMPREHENSIVE
PRIOR TO R£DUCTIO
08SERVl\TION OF ELI
EFFECTIVE MONITORING
l\SSOCIA~ FACILITIES.
PREVIOUS GUIDANCE ON
CONTINUES TO APPLY.
SOVIETS
4.
THERE
INCLUDE,
TA, BO'l'H
S: AND (3)
RIES AND
ION.
!CATION
ADDITIONAL E
REYXJl\VIK,
UNDERSTOOD THAT OTHER
OHS WOl1t.D IL\
E ADDED TO
WHAT llAS /\GREED IN ORDER TO 111\KE II COMPLETE ACREEHE!fr. IH
n!IS CONTEXT, TSE U.S. PROPOSES T!IB FOLLOWING,
5.
- -- REDUCTIONS PROVIDED roR IN THE APPROACH IN PAR/\ 3
WOULD BE CARRIED OUT IN A PIL\SED MANNER TO B!! COMP~
PRIOR TO THE END OF 1991.
•
PREVIOUS GUID
SOVIET ASIA (REF B) ==:::.:=
Tiii! APPROACH l!I PAltA 3
-
••
THE NEGOTI II
TO RESTRICT TBE
HISSIU:S ALLOWED
PREFERA8LY Kl\NSK.
HAY NOT OnE:R RBCIPll
Dlll'LOYllENT IN ALASKA.
TO USE ALASKllN·NON·Dtr
SJIOUU)
s
SOVIET
J ABOYB
NC TBIS
• LIHITATIOHS
OUS
CONTlllCI~
(PAR/\ 10,
tllTllDRAllH.
•
l\GREEMENT
33 ss-20
8ARlll\UL,
IEV'lilt, GROUP
VIHC NON•
ORIZATION
IS
.•
3
• ·• All INF l\CR£EMENT S
CONSTRl\INrS ON SRINF Ml S
NECOTll\TIONS ON R£1>UCT
WITHIN SIX llONTllS A
REl\CHED.
•• THE U,. S, ·c
-. ·I NF ACREEMENT BE or
BY All ACR£EM&NT ON FUR
·:.lllfttifASSIPIEU
INCLUDE l\S !IE
S l\S PREVtOIJSt.Y
N SRINF MtSSt
HITIAL INF
LI>
Ct.COAL
LEI) (REF. 8)
LL BOOIN
IS
..
REQUIRE
TE DURllTIO
EDUCTIONS;
SUCH A FU!ltllllR AC:RJ~ltl
AMY INTERIM ACREEMBNT.
6. TllE INF NECOTIATINC CROuP SHOULD STRESS TBJ\T TllE U.S .
PROCEEDS ON THE PREMISE THAT All INF ACREEMENr CAii BE
NECOTIATED, CONCLUDED AND IMPLDIENl'ED SEPARATELY FROM
DEFENSE AND SPACE AND START ISSUES AND TBJ\T TllE U.S. DOES
NOT ACCEPT ANY CONTRARY PREMISE FOR PROCEEDINC TOWARD AN
INF ACREEMENt.
7 . PARACRAPB 7A CONTAI
INF PROPOSA~MADE IN
PARACRAPB 78 CONTAIN
THE U.S.·SOVIET
HORNING or 12 OC1~
THIS LANCUl\CE. BO
THE: INFORMATION OF
A. SOVIET PROPOSAL;,';.__ti~
MISSILES. AN ACRE~
SOVIET AND U. S.MEl>IUM·
NUCc.EAR POttNrlAt.S OF
IUTAtN AND
AFFt:CTED OR TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. NECOTIATIOllS SIL\l.L BB
INITIATED ON THE PARTIES' MISSILES WITH RANCES BEi.ow
1,000 Klt.OMETERS.
SEPARATELY, AND AS EARLY AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE,
NECOTIATIONS SHALL llE INITIATED ON SOVIET AND U.S.
MEDI UM·RllllGE SYSTEMS IN l\Sl A.
B.
' 11.
BER
U, S. LA!IGUACll TABLED A
THE SIDES AGl\EB•
·· THAT SINCE Tim\!
PROPE!l TREATllENT OP
usoWTION or rats
BASIS.
SSILE SYS
Lt. Bil r
THERE WILL BE Ll,_MUJITSWK
HlSSILES TO TllE ~
INTO ACCOIOO THE CAPAB
REFUCT EQUALITY Btt><'El
STRAINTS ON
ET LEWL, war
s or TBBSll SY
U.S. AND THE
YET EXlST
ON T8B
IA, TllE
tORITY
..._,..m......._.....: •. ·THERE WI LL BE SPECIFIC
INCLUOE1 (1) A COMPRl:HEN
DATA, BOTH PRIOR TO RED
SITE OBSERVATION OF DE
AND( J) EFFECTIVE !ION
INVENTORIES AND AS
INSPECTION.
•
•• U. S. AND SOVIET INF
SUBJECT TO AND CONSTRAI
SIDES NEGOTIATE FIJRTHER
SYSTEMS.
Sl!ULTZ
•• END OF CABLE ••
RIFICATION HEASU
AND ACCUAATE E
S AND TllEREA
ON DOllN TO
F TllE REHA
CILIT IES
WHICH
E OF
2 ) ON•
EVELS;
NF
,
OH· SITE
l~1h\J ("\ i;;,. I
SYSTEM II
90744
ATTACHllE.NT S
nCtASSlflZll
SUBJECT1
TAGS:
REPS:
l.
IOll
(B)
ST
SECRET c.
2.
REFTBL A PROVID
TI1J. POSTGUIDAHCE FOR ~HE
NST DELEGATION FOR R
I, REFLECTING
SSIONS IN OCTOBER
11 - 12 REYXJAVIJt HEl!T
TRIS CABLE PR
ADDITIONJ\L •
CONTINGENCY COIDAHCE
LATIONSRIP OF
0 THE CONCEPT OF
ELIMINATING ALI. OPP
"1.LISTIC HIS
PREVIOUS GUIDANCE
(REFS A AND Bl REMAINS VALID EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. GUIDANCE
FOR THE DEFENSE AND SPACE NEGOTIATING GROOP IS BEING PROVIDED
SEPTEL . TBBJU: WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE POR START AND INF
NEGOTIATING GROUPS TBIS ROUND.
3.
TSE O. S. PROPOSAL TO llLIKIHATE ALL OPPENSIV!! BALLISTIC
MISSILES, OF MBATl:VER RANGE, INVOLVES SNP SYSTEMS OP 'RANGSS t.BSS
THAN THOSE PREVIOOSLY THE
IONS. DISCUSSION OP
SUCH SYSTEMS MAY IUIQOI
OPRIATB NEGOTIATING
FORUM. ONLY TBB GENZ
NG ALL OPPENSIVE
BASLLISTIC llISSII.BS
ROUND. SHOULD THE
SOVIETS RAISE QUEST
FOR SNI' llISSII.BS IN
TRIS REGARD , DEL
HIS TIME IT IS TBB
U.S. OPINION
Y PROVIDE THE KOST
LOGICAL PORUM.
4.
ONCE DELEGATION
SUPPORTING INSTROCTI
WASHillGTOll WOULD
DATE POR COllllENT
SECRET
Declaaaify en : ON>R
IEWED TlmSE
INDIVIDDAL
SLl!:c1'TION' S
G ROUND .
V
U<:l'IONS AND
TDIG CROUPS,
R APPROPRIATE ENDING
SECRET
SUBJECT•
TAGS t
REF:
ADDITIONAL 'cu
NEGOTIATING
PAN!, HCAP. .
(A) STAT
SECl\BT ·-.
•
2.
FOLLOWING IS
NEGOTIATING CROUP PO
PROVIDED IN REP C.
REPLACE GUIDANCE FOR
AND (C) EXCEPT AS K
GUIDAllCB FOR START
CE FOR THB DEF
P
SYSTEM II
907ll'
A'?TACHHENT 6
ANO SPACE
-
(C) STATE 330272
1.
GUIDANCE
I T SUP
IDANCE IS IN
GOTIATI NG GI\
&BLOW. THE
RBCOTIATING
VI.
DEFENSE ANO SPACE
THE CUIOAllCE
ION TO, AND DOES NOi'
S
llllFTELS (A) , , (B)
BE NO ADDITIONAL
THIS llOOND.
3.
IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING PROPOSAL IN THE Pl\BSIDENT'S JULY
25 LETTER TO GENERAL SECRETARY COIIBACBBV, WHICB llEKAIHS ON THE
TAB.LE , TUB OS llECOTIATINC CROOP IS AOTllORIZEO !O PRBSENT THE
FOLLOWING ELEKEN'l'S FOR AN AGREEMENT llBICB llE PROPOSED I N
l\EY!tJAVlJ( AS AN ALTERNATI VE TO THE PRl!SIDEllT' S JOLY PROPOSAL.
THE USSR AND THE 11111
NOi' TO BXBRCISE THEIR EX
TREATY, WHICH IS OF Ull
STRICTLY TO OBSERVE
DEVELOPMENT AND TES
WITHIN TBE
THROUGH 1991) ,
SHALL BE REOOCEO B
DORING THE FOLL
REMAINI NG OPPENSIVE B
ELIMINATED.
D STATES lfOOLD
RTAltE FOR 'TEN YEARS
ING RIGHT or WI
WAL PROK THE ABM
!D DURATION ,
RING TllAT PERIOD
PROVISIONS
o!;(~ONTINUING RESEARCH,
ICH ARB PE
••
Y THE ABK TREA'l'Y.
PEllIOD (ANO TRUS
TWO SIDES
'l'llB
ERIOD, THE
SIDES SHALL BE
TllO
THUS, BY THE ENO
96, ALL OPP
ISTIC MISSILES
OP TllE USSR AND THE UNI TED S'l'ATES WILL SAVE BEEi! TOrALLY
ELIMINATED, AND EITHER SIDE COULD DEPLOY ADVANCED STRATEGIC
DEFENSES II' IT SO CBOSB, UNLBSS THE .PARTIES ACREE 01'l!ERWISB.
4•
THB ABOVll UNDERTAKI NGS' WOQLD BE Rl!CON>ED Ill A REW TREATY.
5.
Ill PRZSDrillG THE AB
SBOULD HAQ CI.EAi\ TllA!'
CONDITIOnD OR 'l'llll TWO
AGREEKmrr BOW, AS P
REDOCTIOllS UStJI.T
OFFENSIVE PORCES
ELIMINATION OF
~-!~.-
GOrI ATillG GROUP
BE STJUCTLY
Y SATISFACTORY
SCll!DOLll 01'
IN THE STRATEGIC
S BY 1991 AND TOTAL
ES- OF BOTH SIDES BY
SYST£M II
90744
ATTACllM&NT l
•
OVERALL IN
'
OP IMMED
DE RUEHC 10271 2950316
0 220311Z OCT 86
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO USDEL NST CENEVA IMMEt>lllTE 1743
S E C R £ T STATE 330271
EXDIS, USNST
E.O. 12356' DECL:OllDR
TACS: PARM , INF, START, M
SUBJECT: ( S) llDDITIONAL
TSPA, NST, DS
E FOR US/SO
AND SPACE TALICS
ll£F:
STl\nl 291634
1.
2. FOLLOW! NC IS llDD IT
IDA.NCE FOR
DELECATION IOR ROUND V
ING DISCU
IN
OC'?OBER 1 1-12 REYKJAVIK llBETING. lfASBINGTON CIONTINVES
TO EVALUATE HOW BEST TO BUILD Ul'ON POSITIVE·
ACCOMPLISllMtNTS OF THAT llEETINC AND WILL PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL CUIDAllCE SHORTLY, INCLUl>INO OUIDANCE ON TllE
CONCEPT or ELlllillATINO ALL OFfENSIVE BALLlSTIC MlSSltr;S
11111> ITS LUOC TO OBLICATlotl
ITH RESPECT TO
11911
TREATY.
PltZ'illOUS CUID
ITEL) ROIAINS
ID EXCEPT
AS MODIFIEI> ULOW. CUI
l'OR llACB or
E
NEGOTIATING OllOCTPS IS
ROVIDED S
3.
U.S OBJECTIVES
INCLUDE1
-- TO BUILD UPoH t8E
REYICJAVIK BY INDUCING
SllRIOUSNESS AND FLEXIB
..
l
0
•• TO FRESENr U.S. P
llNDERSTANDINOS REA
INSTRUCTIONS TO .
FOR AMPLI
YKJAVIK,
TINO CR
•• TO REJECT SOVIET
UNDERSTANl>INCS R&ACll&D
Et.AM>.
TH IN THE
TO Ml:SClllAI
-- TO REJECT SOVIET A
TO HOLD PROO
NEGOTIA:rlNC FORUM HOST
PROORESS IN
DELECA:r!ON SllOULD VICO
OBJECT TO
CHAAACTERIZATION THAT PROCUSS IN INF IS ONCE ACAIN
LlllK£D TO PROCRESS IN OTHER AREAS, NOTINC THAT THIS
CONTRADICTS SPECIFIC llNDERSTANDINO REACHED DURINC CEN&VA
SUMMIT TO SEEK A SEPARATE INF ACREDIENr AND TO
ACCELEBATE PROCRESS IN IJIEAS OF COIOION CROUND.
4 . SHOULD SOVIETS RAISE ISSllE OF ELIMINATION OF ALL
OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILE BY 1996, AS PROPO &I> BY
PRESIDENT IN R£YICJAVIX, DE
TION SHOULD
T TUE
FIRST STEP IN nu: El.IHI
OF BALLISTIC
!LIS MUST
BE THE SO-PERCENT STAR
IONS AND SI
INF
REOUCTIONS DISCUSSED
AVIX AND
S MORE
EFFICIENT TO DISCUS
PS FIRST
WASHINCTON Alfl'ICI
INC THI
DETAILED CUIDAllCE
C HISSI
27
OCTOBER.)
5.
IF THE SOVIETS RAI
ISSUES, TUE DELECATIO!I
SROULI> BE PURS1JEI> IN
SHOU[.J) THE SOVIETS SPE
PROCR&SS IN HST, AS
CORBACllEV IN REYlt.JAVIK, DEc.ECATION SHOU[.J) REPLY THAT THE
UNITED STATES EXPRESSED ITS READlllBSS IN REYJ:JAVllt TO
ENTER NECOTIATIO!IS ON NUCLEAR TESTING ISSUES ANI> mAT
SPECIFIC SOVIET R&COMllENDATIO!IS SHOULD 81!: RAISEI> IN TUE
APPROPRIAT!: CBAHNELS. TUE DEc.EOATION S110t/LD RESIST Alf{
FllRTllER SOVlft BRORTS TO DISCUSS LIMITATIONS ON NUCl.&AR
TESTING Ill 111B llST l'OIWll.
~
• • END
or
CABLE ••
-
•
' SYSTEM II
90744
ATTACHMENT 2
-
OP IMMED
DE RUEHC 10273 2950318
0 220312Z OCT 86
FM SECSTATE WASBDC
TO USDEL HST c:ENE\lj
S E C R E T STATE
0000
£XDIS. USSTMT
E.O. 12356: DECL:OADR
TACS: l'ARM. START. ""'"
SUBJECT: (S) ADDITIO
OROUl'
REF:
E FOR STAR
IATIHC
(A) STATE 291634 (8) STATE 290210
l.
SECRET • ENrlRE TEXT.
2.
FOLLOlllNC IS ADDITIONAL
CUID~E
FOR THE START
2
I
.•
NE<:O?IATINC CROUP IN R
OCTOBER 11·12 R£Yl(JAVI
TO &VALUATE HOW BEST
ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF
ADDITIONAL CUID
I, l\EFL!X:TINC
lNO. WA.Sill
UPON POSI
INC >.ND WI
INCLUDI
..
TIMEFRAME FOR SO•PERC
Of ELIMINATINC ALL OF
3.
INC THAT TllE
INC lfAS
ACREEJ) 1'ND, THEREFORE,
S. START
CROUP
SHOULD CONFllUI THEIR ACCEPTANCE BY THE SOVIETS,
-- A 1600 CEILINC ON ICBMS, SLBl!IS, HEAVY BOMBERS;
-- A 6000 CEILINC ON lfAA!IEADS, TO INCLUDE: ICBM WARHEADS,
SLBM WARHEADS, >.ND LONC·RANC& AI.CMS.
-- ALL ITEAVY BOMJIERS COUNT ACAINST TllE SNOV LIMIT. EACH
HEAVY llOMBER CARRYINC CMV
BOMBS OR SRAHS
COUNT
AS ONE Wt.MEAD TOlfARD
IT or 6000.
CARRIED BY HEAVY BOMB!
COUNT AS 0
{FYI' AS PAAT OF THE
TIONS ON
ISIONS,
ACCOUNTINC RULES FO
INC THEii
TO 8!
WORl<ED OUT, AND WA
ITES DE
vn:ws ON
SUCH RULES. )
.
-- CONSIDERATION OF APP
CONTINUE.
PR
-- HEAVY ICBMS llOULD BE
IC
• • TllE SIDES SllALL Pl
TO LtMITINC DEPLOYKEHT
ALLY ACCEPT
LUTION
OF LONG-RANCE NUCLEAR•AAMED
SLCMS. WHEN SUCH A SOLUTION IS FOUND, IT lflLL NOT
INVOLVE OOUNTINC LONC·RANCE NUCLEAR-ARMED SLCMS lflTHIN
THE 6000/1600 LIMITS. IN TBIS RECARD, TllE DELECATION
SHOULD SEEK OUT DETAILS, ESPECIALLY DETAILS RELATINC TO
lltRIFICATlON, OF THE SOVIET POSITION THAT liOULD A1'1UIP1'
TO MEET U.S. COHCEllHS.
4. IN THE CONDXr OF
CRAVlTY BOllBS N4D S LlMlT HEAVY llOllBDS
A PART OF OUR POSIT!
5. AT UYKJAVlK,
PROVISIONS WOULD BA
ORDER TO MAKE A COllP
SUllLlMlTS WERE DISCUSS
THE CONSlDEIYITIOH or
START NECOT!ATIHO 0
SUllLlMITS ON'
VE AGaEEllEHT
PREVIOUS U.S.
REDUNDANT
. ..._-
·-
~
3
•• BALLISTIC MISSILE W
ICBM WAIUIEAl>Si
WARHEADS ON AL
- . BASED LICHT AHO-
-
.
ICBMS
WITH S
ON SILO:
WAl\llEADS;
•• WHILE Tl!! PREFEIUW>
RElllllH 4500, 3000, Alm
NECOTIATINO GROUP IS A
"'
4800 BALLISTIC MISSILE
S, 3300 IC
S, AHD
1650 WARHEADS OH ICBMS EXCEPT SILO•BASED LIOHT OR M!J>IUM
ICBMS WITll SIK OR FEWER WAlUl£AOS.
(llOTEt
THIS PROPOSAL
RESULTS IN NO RPT NO SUBLIMIT OH ALC14S.)
•• n1E AFOREMENTIONED SUBLIMITS All!: TllE U.S. PROPOSAL
FOR IHPLEMEHTINC TllE SOVIET OFFER IN RE'ilC.JAVIK THAT
HEAVY ICBMS BB SICHIFICAHT REDUCED. THE U.S SIDE
ANTICIPATES THAT SUCH AH
OM:!! WILL REl>U
" VY
ICBMS SIClllFICAHTLY (£.
ROUCHLY HALF
APPROPRIATE MANNER.
· · ALL OTHER E~~
PROPOSAL IU!lfAUI
l\ND THE SO·PERCElll'
WlllCHT) .
6.
T8E OCTOBER 15 SOV
SOVIET PROPOSAL FOR SO
AND WEAPONS AS WELL AS
Tl!B
'AL SHDVS
GIC
!IV.VY
ICH llAS
PRf!SENrED IH RrtlCJAYIIC AND REJECTED BY THE U.S •• SHOULD
TlllS FORMULATION BE TABLED IN CEllEVA, THE HECOTIATING
CROUP SHOULD REJECT THE PROPOSAL AS FOLLOWS'
SYsn:M (I.E., ICBMS, S
·· IH RE'tl<JAYIK THE SIDES AGREED IN PRINOIPLB TO 50·
PERCENT RF.DUCTIONS IN STRATEOIC OFFENSIW AllllS,
SPECIFICALLY TO 1600 SNDYS AND 6000 lfARllEADS
APPROPRIATELY APPLIED.
AIM OlHER B:LEl-i?l or lU£
INITIAL SOVIET fOIUIULATI
ROPOSED IN UYICJ' IC WERE
DITERlllNED BY TBS U.S.
TIMI TO RE
AH
INEQUITABLll ourccem
FORE MgRg
• THE
U.S. PROPOSM. fOR SO
REDUCTIONS
ON 'l'llOSE
ELEKEll?S MUTUALLY
REYX.JAYIK
DEi; FOR
AN AOREED &QUIT
7.
EtfECtlYll VERIP
AS AOREZD AT OEHEVA
SllOULD Bl! N!X»?IADD
LIMITATIONS. THE 'nlO
PROORESS llADE IN lllP W
PRINCIPLES (SEI! INr IN
••
NECOTIATIOHS OH
S. EXCEPT AS HODIE'I ED
REMAIN UNCHANC!!D .
9.
PARAGRAPH 9A
'· ·PROPOSAL MADE iH RE
PARAGRAPH 98 CONTAINS
U.S.-SOVIET EXPERTS C~
OCT08£R. 80TH ME PRO
THE NEGOTIATING CROUP.
E
TEXT 0
ER 11 .
THE
lllO OF 12
TIOH OE'
-- A. INITIAL SOVIET P
, AH OCTOBER
• ON
STRATEGIC ARMS . AN ACREEl!!Nr TO REDUCE SY FIFrY PEJ\CENT
THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS OF THE USSR AND THE USA
TAKINC INTO CONSIDERATION THE HISTORICALLY FORMED
DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES OF THE PARTIES'
STRATEGIC FORCES. WITHIN TRIS FJIAllEWORI(, llEDUCTIOHS .
SHALL APPLY TO ALL TYPES 0 OFf'EllSIVE STRATEC
IHCWDINC l!&AVY lllSSILES.
SOLUTION SHALL
FOUND WITH REGARD TO Lt
C THE DEPLO
RANCE SEA- LAUNCHED CR
SS I LES .
ON ALL MATTERS RE
OFFENSIVE AIU'IS
FOA THEIR l!llTllAL I
A POLITICAL WILL TO
- - B. EXPERTS CROUP AC
12 . ON STRATtalC AJUIS
TO REDUCE SY l'l l'TY P&R
BER
PREPARED
TO
AN EQUAL NUMBER or ICllMS, SLl!MS AND HEAVY BOMBERS
( APPROXIMATELY 1600) AND WARHEADS (HOT MORE nw; 6000) ,
TAKING INTO ACCOUNT HISTORICALLY FOllllED DISTINCTIVE
FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES or THE PARTIES' STRATEGIC
FORCES. WITHIN THIS !'lU\MEWOBI(, REDUCTIONS Sl!ALL APPLY
TO ALL TYPES or STRATEGIC OPFENSIVE AJUIS, IHCWDlllO A
SIGNIFICANT IMlllER or HEAVY MISSILES. A MUTUALLY
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION SHALL
0 BE FOUND TO LI TING
DEPLOYHEHl' or LON:l-RANCE
LBAR-AIUIED SEACRUISE lllSSIUS.
Otl ALL llAT'IO.S RELA
OFFENSIVE ARMS THE
FOR THEIR l!llTllAL
A POLITICAL WILL
** END OS CABLE **
SYSTEM II
90744
ATTACHMENT J
SE Alfi>
SPAC
RUCTIONS
OP IHMED
OE Rl/EHC 10272 29503
0 220311Z <>er 86
Fii
SECSTATE l/A,5111)(11
TO USOEL NST C£NEVA I
STATE 330
S E C R E T
0000
EXOIS, USOST
E.o. 1235610ECL,OAOR
TAGS: PARM, MCAP. TSPA, NST, OST
SUBJECT: (S) ADDITIONAi. CUIOANCE FOR DEFENSE ANO SPACE
NECOTIATING CROUP
REF1
1.
(A) STATE 291909; (8) STATE 29566
SECRET • !NrlRB TEXT.
2. FOLLOlllNG IS Al>DITIO
SPACE NECOTIM:ING GltOUP
PROPOSALS llAOE TO nm
ING
,.
B!:TWEEN 'I1!E PRES !DENT AND
OCTOBER 11• 12. THIS CU
DOES NOT REPLACE CUID
REFTELS (A) AND (B)
SPECIFICALI..Y HOTEi)
2
., .
RAL SECRETARY
IS IN ADDITI
, D&S NECOTI
IOUS ROUNDS
CHEV
• AND
ON
CROUP OF
AS
..
THE EXISTING US PR
OUIDANCE AND IN TltE P
GENERAL SECRETARY 00
3.
4.
PARAGRAPH ( 4A) CO
INITIAL S
ROPOSAL
KADE IN REYKJ'AVIK ON TllE FIRST DAY OF Tiii! DISCUSSIONS .
PARAGRAPH (48) PROVIDES TBE TEXT OP Tiii! FIRST US
AI..TERNATIVE PROPOSAL MADE BY Tll£ PRESIDENr TO GENERAi..
SECRETARY GORBACHEV IN REYKJAVIK ON TllE AFTERNOON OF THE
SECOND DAY OF DISCUSSIONS. PAllACRAPB (4C) PROVIDES THE
TEXT or THE SOVIET COUNTERPROPOSAL MADE THAT SAME
AFTERNOON. PARAORAPH (4D) PROVIDES THE TEXT Of THE
SECOND AND I.AST US ALTEIUIAT !IE PROPOSAL llAOE I llRlTINO
BY TllE PRESIDENr. THESE
PROVIDED FOR THE
INFORMATION OF THE NECOT
CROuP.
/\.
SOVIET PROPOS/\L,
STl\ENCTllEN INO THE
LIMITATION OF ANT
ICH IS
REACHED
OF UllLIHITED DURAT
THAT THE USSR AND
ISE
THEIR RIC!IT TO lfl'l'llDRAW
ERIOD OF
TEN YEARS, AND TO STRI
PROVISIONS TllF.OUCHOUT
ALL MISSll..E·DEFENSE SP
EXCEPT FOR RESEARCH
LABOllATORlt:S. THIS WO
ENTAIL A
TESTING OF SUCll FIXED LAND-BASED SYSTEl!S AND 'l'BEIR
COMPOllENTS AS ARE ALl.OW&D UNDER TBE ABM TRt:ATY.
SUBSEQUENTLY, WITHIN SEVERAL YEARS, TBI!! PMTIES SHALL
NEGOTIATE FURl'llEll MUTUALLY ACCEPTABI..E SOLUTIONS IN THIS
AR.£A. THE PARTIES DE!M IT APPROPRIATE TO UNDERTAJ:B
ADDITIONAL EFFORTS WITH A VIEW TO ACHIEVE MUTUALLY
ACCUTABIZ ~S BAHll
ANTl·SATl:LLITE S STEHS.
·s .
FIRST US PROPOSAL,
AcREt: TO CC>llFI NZ Tl!EllS
TESTING, WHICH IS P
PERIOD OF FIVE YEAR
SO PERCENT REDUCT
ll£ ACHIEVED. THI
TllE PACE OF RmUCTI
OFFENSIVE 81\LLISTIC Ml
ELIMINATION or ALL 0
END or TBB SECOND FIVE
REDUCTIONS CONTINUI AT
RESTRICTIONS 1111..L CONr
BER 12. 80'?8
RESEABCB,
TBB A1lll
1991, D
EOIC
• BO'rH
SPECT ro
llltll -TBB
BALLISTIC Ml
ERIOD. AS
PROPRIATE P
APPLY. AT