Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Plant Physiology and Biochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/plaphy Research article Comprehensive survey of redox sensitive starch metabolising enzymes in Arabidopsis thaliana Mikkel A. Glaring a, b, c, Katsiaryna Skryhan a, Oliver Kötting c, Samuel C. Zeeman c, Andreas Blennow a, * a VKR Research Centre Pro-Active Plants, Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Copenhagen, 40 Thorvaldsensvej, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark Department of Agriculture and Ecology, University of Copenhagen, 40 Thorvaldsensvej, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark c Department of Biology, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland b a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Received 4 April 2012 Accepted 19 June 2012 Available online 28 June 2012 In chloroplasts, the ferredoxin/thioredoxin pathway regulates enzyme activity in response to light by reduction of regulatory disulfides in target enzymes, ensuring coordination between photosynthesis and diurnal metabolism. Although earlier studies have suggested that many starch metabolic enzymes are similarly regulated, redox regulation has only been verified for a few of these in vitro. Using zymograms and enzyme assays, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the redox sensitivity of known starch metabolising enzymes in extracts of Arabidopsis thaliana. Manipulation of redox potentials revealed that several enzymatic activities where activated by reduction at physiologically relevant potentials. Among these where the isoamylase complex AtISA1/AtISA2, the limit dextrinase AtLDA, starch synthases AtSS1 and AtSS3, and the starch branching enzyme AtBE2. The reversibility of the redox reaction was confirmed by enzyme assays for AtLDA, AtSS1 and AtSS3. Analysis of an AtBAM1 knock-out mutant identified an additional redox sensitive b-amylase activity, which was most likely AtBAM3. A similar requirement for reducing conditions was observed for recombinant chloroplastic a-amylase (AtAMY3) activity. This study adds further candidates to the list of reductively activated starch metabolising enzymes and supports the view that redox regulation plays a role in starch metabolism. Ó 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: Arabidopsis Starch Redox regulation Starch metabolism Starch synthase 1. Introduction Starch is a major product of photosynthetic carbon fixation and serves important functions as a storage carbohydrate. In the chloroplast of leaves, starch accumulates during the day and is degraded during the night to provide energy for continued growth in the dark. This repeated cycle of biosynthesis and degradation requires regulation of key metabolic pathways in order to balance the available photosynthate with the requirements for growth and storage [1e3]. Carbon assimilation is limited by the light available for photosynthesis and light itself acts as a regulatory signal that allows the plant to switch between light and dark metabolism. This occurs through the chloroplastic ferredoxin/thioredoxin system, Abbreviations: AGPase, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; AMY, a-amylase; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; BAM, b-amylase; BE, starch branching enzyme; DTT, dithiothreitol; DTTox (oxidised DTT), trans-4,5-dihydroxy-1,2-dithiane; Fdx, Ferredoxin; GWD, a-glucan, water dikinase; ISA, isoamylase; LDA, limit dextrinase; MDH, NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase; NTRC, NADP-thioredoxin reductase C; PHS, starch phosphorylase; SS, starch synthase; Trx, thioredoxin. * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ45 35333304. E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Blennow). 0981-9428/$ e see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.06.017 which converts a light-activated electron signal into a thiol signal. Electrons transported through the photosystems during photosynthesis reduce ferredoxin (Fdx), which, in turn, leads to the sequential reduction of ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase (FTR) and a family of thioredoxins (Trx). The Trxs then directly reduce their target enzymes by catalysing a disulfide to thiol conversion, thus linking the availability of light to the activity of numerous enzymes [4]. The elucidation of this process for widespread reversible posttranslational modification has led to the general view that redox sensitive biosynthetic enzymes in chloroplasts are mainly active during the day and inhibited at night. A complete Fdx/Trx system has also been identified in amyloplasts from wheat endosperm. In this tissue, Fdx is reduced not by light, but by metabolically generated NADPH via ferredoxin-NADP reductase [5]. The building blocks for starch biosynthesis, ADP-glucose, is produced from glucose 1-phosphate and ATP by the enzyme ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase). In the light, glucose 1phosphate is synthesised from Calvin cycle intermediates by phosphoglucose isomerase and phosphoglucomutase. The activity of AGPase in leaves is regulated by both the available light and sugars through the breaking and formation of a disulfide bridge between the two small subunits of the AGPase heterotetrameric M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 Redu c e d A O x i di z ed ISA1/2 BAM1 LDA 03 17 -3 33 26 -3 -3 38 -3 -3 42 48 -3 55 -3 66 -3 -3 B -3 80 DPE1 BAM5 mV SS3 BAM1 AMY3 26 -3 21 -3 17 -3 12 -3 03 -3 30 -3 33 -3 38 -3 42 -3 48 -3 -3 55 SS1 80 enzyme complex [6,7]. This is similar to the light-dependent redox activation of enzymes of the Calvin cycle and both processes are activated by reduced Trx, ensuring coordination between photosynthesis and starch biosynthesis in response to light [4]. Recently, reductive activation of AGPase by the bifunctional NADPthioredoxin reductase C (NTRC) was discovered as an alternative mechanism of redox regulation in Arabidopsis. NTRC uses NADPH to reduce AGPase and is linked to photoreduced Fdx by the ferredoxin-NADP reductase, thus complementing the classical Fdx/ Trx system [8]. Potential targets of redox regulation by Trxs have previously been identified by a variety of methods. Initially, many of these were identified based on in vitro changes in activity observed after reduction using non-physiological substitutes for Trx, such as dithiothreitol (DTT) [4,9]. Over the last decade, both proteomic and in vitro approaches have greatly expanded the number of targets and among these are several enzymes involved in starch metabolism [9,10]. Apart from AGPase, these include potato a-glucan, water dikinase (GWD) and Arabidopsis b-amylase 1 (AtBAM1) and phosphoglucan phosphatase SEX4, all of which are activated by Trxs in vitro [11e13]. Similarly, a poplar leaf endoamylase was shown to be reversibly inactivated by oxidation and activated by DTT and E. coli Trx [14], although it is not clear whether this enzyme is localised in the chloroplasts. The activity and isoform pattern of limit dextrinase, also called pullulanase, from wheat and spinach is influenced by the redox conditions in vitro [15,16], however, activation by Trx has not been demonstrated. Another two enzymes, a1,4-glucan phosphorylase (starch phosphorylase) and starch branching enzyme IIa, were identified as potential Trx targets in a proteomic analysis of isolated wheat amyloplasts [5]. The identification of Trx targets among enzymes thought to be active during starch degradation in the dark has led to speculation about the significance of these findings. The presence of a redox regulated, stress-induced starch degradation pathway has been proposed as an explanation for the Trx induced activation of AtBAM1 [12] and there is some evidence to support this [17]. The experimental evidence hinting at a potentially extensive redox regulation of starch metabolism prompted us to perform a comprehensive survey of the effect of manipulating redox potentials in vitro on the activity of chloroplastic starch metabolising enzymes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Using native substratecontaining gels (zymograms) and enzyme assays we were able to identify several enzymatic activities among both the biosynthetic and degradative enzymes of starch metabolism as potential targets of redox regulation in planta. -3 90 mV Fig. 1. Redox mediated changes in starch metabolising enzyme activities. An extract of Arabidopsis wild type was treated with different ratios of reduced to oxidised DTT (DTT/DTTox) in a total concentration of 40 mM. The redox potentials of the mixtures were calculated using the Nernst equation and a midpoint redox potential of DTT at pH 7.9 of 380 mV. Enzyme activities were detected in zymograms containing amylopectin (A) or glycogen (B). Starch synthase activities were visualised after incubation in buffer containing ADP-glucose (B). The identified enzyme activities are indicated by arrows. Representative zymogram shown. Fig. S1). The identifiable redox insensitive enzymes included the cytosolic AtBAM5 and disproportionating enzyme 1 (AtDPE1). The identities of the observed in-gel activities were assigned by comparison to previously published results [18e21] and, where required, verified by analysis of Arabidopsis knock-out mutants in each enzyme (data not shown; Fig. S1). The activity of the remaining chloroplastic isoforms of BAM, SS, and BE, as well as the isoamylase AtISA3 could not be visualised by zymogram analysis. The ability of the observed enzyme activities to respond to physiological redox potentials was investigated by redox titration of plant extracts using different ratios of reduced to oxidised DTT. 2. Results 2.1. Zymogram analyses of redox sensitive starch metabolising enzymes Potential redox sensitive starch metabolising enzymes were identified by modulating the redox potential in leaf extracts of A. thaliana (At) using the reducing redox reagent dithiothreitol (DTT) and the corresponding oxidised form (trans-4,5-dihydroxy1,2-dithiane; DTTox) followed by zymogram analysis. Among the starch hydrolysing enzymes active on amylopectin, b-amylase 1 (AtBAM1), limit dextrinase (AtLDA), and the isoamylase complex AtISA1/AtISA2, were only active under reducing conditions (Fig. 1A). Analysis of soluble starch synthases (SS) and starch branching enzymes (BE) in glycogen-containing and substrate-free zymograms, respectively, showed reductive activation of AtSS1, AtSS3 and AtBE2 (Figs. 1B and 2). The glycogen-containing zymograms also revealed activation of two degrading activities corresponding to AtBAM1 and the chloroplastic a-amylase AtAMY3 (Fig. 1B; BE2 1st 2nd - DTT DTT DTT DTTox DTTox DTTox DTTox DTT Fig. 2. Redox mediated changes in starch branching enzyme activity. Extracts of Arabidopsis were reduced or oxidised with 20 mM DTT or DTTox, respectively, for 1 h at 25 C (1st). After gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 columns, extracts were subjected to the same or the reverse treatment (2nd). Extracts were separated by native PAGE and SBE activity was visualised using the phosphorylase a stimulation method followed by iodine staining. Representative zymogram shown. M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 2.2. Quantitative analyses of redox sensitivity In order to quantitatively analyse the effect of modulating the redox conditions in vitro, enzyme assays were carried out using extracts of Arabidopsis wild type and various knock-out mutants after treatment with reductant or oxidant to obtain a fully reduced or oxidised extract, respectively. Where possible, the reversibility of the observed activity-changes was also investigated. For some enzymes, the direct thiol exchange rate with DTT and DTTox in vitro is very slow and redox equilibrium is not attained in the lifetime of the enzyme [25,26]. Thioredoxins can catalyse this exchange and although plant extracts contain potentially active endogenous Trxs, recombinant Arabidopsis Trxs were included in the extracts used in the following analyses to increase the efficiency of the DTT and DTTox treatments. Two thioredoxins with a ubiquitous expression pattern in green tissues (www.genevestigator.com) were chosen as representatives of families f and m of the chloroplastic thioredoxins; TRXf1, which is an activator of most thioredoxin targets [4], and TRXm4, which is an efficient activator of chloroplastic NADP-malate dehydrogenase [27]. Since the thiol-disulfide state of enzymes cannot be reliably preserved during extraction, it was not possible to directly investigate the changes in activity that might occur as a response to altered redox conditions in planta, such as during a diurnal cycle. 2.3. b-Amylases A b-amylase (BAM) was first picked out as a target of Trx in spinach chloroplasts [28]. Subsequently, AtBAM1 was shown to be redox regulated in vitro and directly activated by DTT and chloroplast Trxs, with TRXf1 being the most efficient redox mediator [12,17]. In an attempt to identify additional redox regulated bamylases we analysed the effect of modulating the redox conditions in extracts of an AtBAM1 mutant. A small, but significant (p < 0.01, paired t-test), increase in total b-amylase activity was observed after treatment with DTT suggesting that at least one other bamylase is activated by reduction (Fig. 3). This is comparable to results obtained earlier [17]. Experiments with an AtBAM3 mutant showed a similar activation by DTT, presumably of endogenous AtBAM1. Interestingly, analysis of an AtBAM1/3 double mutant did not reveal any significant changes in activity in response to DTT or DTTox, indicating that AtBAM3 could be responsible for the observed response (Fig. 3). There is no conservation of the two redox-active cysteine residues between AtBAM1 and any other BAM in Arabidopsis (C32 and C470 in the mature peptide) [12]. Three of the seven cysteines in AtBAM3 are located in two flexible loops involved in substrate binding in soybean b-amylase and are adjacent to, or part of, the active site (C169, C177 and C257) [29]. Homology modelling the AtBAM3 structure on soybean b-amylase showed that the three cysteines are close in the tertiary structure and could potentially form disulfide bridges that would block access to the active site (Fig. S2). 120 115 % of water control Redox potentials covering the range of midpoint potentials for known redox regulated chloroplastic enzymes were investigated (380 to 300 mV at pH 7.9). A clear change in activity was observed at potentials around 340 to 320 mV (Fig. 1A and B). This is within the range reported for other redox regulated chloroplast enzymes such as Arabidopsis phosphoribulokinase (PRK, 330 mV) [22], spinach NADP glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, 353 mV) [23], and tomato fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), PRK, and ATP synthase (348 mV, -315 mV and 335 mV, respectively) [24], as well as the starch metabolising enzymes BAM1 (350 mV) [12] and GWD (310 mV) [11]. 91 110 105 100 95 90 85 DTT DTTox Fig. 3. Total b-amylase activity in reduced and oxidised extracts of Arabidopsis. Extracts of wild type Col-0 and BAM knock-out mutants were treated with 20 mM DTT/DTTox and 2 mM each of recombinant TRXf1 and TRXm4 for 1 h at 25 C. Total bamylase activity was assayed on p-nitrophenol maltopentaoside (PNPG5). Measurements are the means SE of four independent samples. The activity of a water-treated control was set to 100% for each sample. 2.4. a-Amylases An endoamylase was previously isolated from poplar leaves and shown to be activated by reductants and E. coli Trx [14]. However, given the reported size (44 kD) this is unlikely to be an orthologue of the large chloroplastic a-amylases [30]. We initially observed a reductive activation of a degrading activity in glycogencontaining zymograms (Fig. 1B). This activity was absent in knock-out mutants of the chloroplastic a-amylase AtAMY3 suggesting that this enzyme could be redox regulated (Fig. S1). This prompted us to study the effect of DTT on recombinant, purified AtAMY3, which demonstrated a clear dependency on DTT for activity on amylopectin. The oxidised inactive form had only 1.6% (0.7%) activity compared to the active form obtained after treatment with DTT (100 1.3%). 2.5. Starch phosphorylases An a-1,4-glucan phosphorylase (PHS) was previously identified as a putative Trx target in wheat amyloplasts [5]. Using enzyme assays of plant extracts, we tested the effect of DTT and DTTox on total PHS activity on amylopectin and maltoheptaose. Neither treatment led to a significant change in activity (p > 0.05, paired ttest) when compared to a water-treated control (Table 1). Oxidation by 100 mM CuCl2 did lead to a substantial loss of activity, however, this could not be efficiently recovered by subsequent desalting and treatment with DTT (Table 2), indicating an irreversible inactivation of PHS activity. 2.6. Isoamylases The Arabidopsis genome encodes three isoamylases. AtISA1 and AtISA2 form a multimeric enzyme complex involved in starch biosynthesis and AtISA3 is involved in starch degradation [31]. Visualisation of AtISA1/AtISA2 in zymograms showed that DTT is required for full activity of this enzyme complex (Fig. 1A). It cannot be ruled out that this is a consequence of a redox mediated effect on the enzyme complex, leading to an altered position in the gel, and not a change in total activity. However, as it is not possible to specifically assay AtISA1/AtISA2 activity in plant extracts, this could 92 M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 Table 1 Redox sensitivity of starch metabolising enzymes. Extracts of Arabidopsis were treated with reductant (Red; 20 mM DTT) or oxidant (Ox; 20 mM DTTox for PHS, ISA3 and MDH; 250 mM CuCl2 for DPE1) supplemented with 2 mM each of recombinant TRXf1 and TRXm4 for 1 h at 25 C and immediately assayed. PHS activity was assayed on both amylopectin and maltoheptaose. ISA3 activity was measured in extracts of a LDA mutant on b-limit dextrin in the presence of saturating amounts of barley b-amylase and the results are given as production of maltose and maltotriose. Chloroplastic NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase (MDH) was used as a redox control. Measurements are the means SE from three independent samples. The activity is given as percentage of a water-treated control. Enzyme Red (%) PHS on amylopectin PHS on maltoheptaose ISA3, maltose ISA3, maltotriose MDH DPE1 108 115 111 114 2130 100 Ox (%) 6.0 6.2 3.3 4.1 59 5.7 101 100 91.6 96.7 96.9 98.9 2.8 0.8 2.0 2.2 0.5 5.9 not be verified by other methods. The redox sensitivity of AtISA3 was determined by a specific assay on b-limit dextrin in extracts of an AtLDA mutant following treatment with DTT or DTTox. Measurements of maltose and maltotriose release from b-limit dextrin showed a significant difference between the reduced and oxidised samples for both products (p < 0.05, paired t-test; Table 1), although this only represented a total difference in activity of less than 20%. 2.7. Disproportionating enzyme The chloroplastic disproportionating enzyme AtDPE1 was visible as a faint red band in amylopectin-containing gels and did not appear to respond to changes in the redox potential (Fig. 1A). This was confirmed by enzyme assays in extracts of Arabidopsis using the DPE1 specific substrate maltotriose. No change in AtDPE1 activity was observed after treatment with DTT or high concentrations of CuCl2 (250 mM; Table 1). 2.8. Limit dextrinase Limit dextrinase, also called pullulanase, has previously been identified as redox sensitive in vitro in spinach and wheat [15,16] and Table 2 Inactivation and reactivation of starch metabolising enzymes. Extracts of Arabidopsis wild type Col-0 were treated with reductant (1st; 20 mM DTT) or oxidant (2nd; 100 mM CuCl2 or 20 mM DTTox) for 1 h at 25 C, desalted on Sephadex G-25 gel filtration columns, and subsequently treated with 20 mM DTT or 20 mM DTTox/ water for 1 h at 25 C before assaying for enzyme activity. MDH was used as a redox control. Measurements are the means SE from three (LDA, PHS, MDH) or five (SS, total soluble starch synthase activity) independent samples. Activity is given as a percentage of the fully reduced samples. 1st 2nd Enzyme Activity (%) DTT DTT DTT Water CuCl2 DTT CuCl2 Water DTT DTT DTTox DTTox Water DTTox Water DTT LDA PHS MDH LDA PHS MDH LDA PHS MDH LDA PHS MDH SS SS SS SS 100 100 100 89.9 98.1 5.07 106 84.0 46.3 6.73 79.5 3.79 100 51.2 14.9 71.4 7.7 5.2 3.9 8.7 4.6 0.1 6.5 4.7 7.3 2.6 3.8 0.2 9.6 4.1 1.5 5.2 AtLDA showed a clear dependency on DTT for full activity when examined in amylopectin-containing gels (Fig. 1A). This observation was confirmed in gels containing red-pullulan, which is a substrate exclusively degraded by LDA (Fig. S3). Using CuCl2 as an oxidising agent it was possible to decrease the activity of the fully reduced AtLDA to less than 10% of maximum activity. This loss of activity could be completely recovered by subsequent treatment with DTT, demonstrating the reversibility of the oxidationereduction reaction (Table 2). The three cysteines tentatively proposed to be involved in redox sensitivity and isoform microheterogeneity of spinach pullulanase (C390, C452 and C677) [15] are conserved in AtLDA (C456, C518 and C743). Modelling the structure of AtLDA on barley LDA indicated that, although these three cysteines are located on the same side of the central a/b-barrel, as suggested earlier [15], there is considerable distance between them, making direct disulfide bridge formation dependent on a significant conformational change (Fig. S4). Only one cysteine is conserved between Arabidopsis, spinach and wheat LDA (Arabidopsis C743), hinting at a different mechanism of redox sensitivity in these enzymes. 2.9. Soluble starch synthases Arabidopsis contains four soluble starch synthases (SS) which serve distinct functions in amylopectin biosynthesis [21]. Two major SS activities can be visualised in glycogen-containing zymograms (SS1 and SS3) [21] and an analysis of Arabidopsis extracts showed that both of these SSs were activated by reduction (Fig. 1B). Following separation under oxidising conditions, both enzymes could be activated in the gel by incubation with DTT, indicating that the lack of visible activity of the oxidised enzymes was not caused by an altered position in the gel (Fig. S5). The observed redox sensitivity was corroborated by enzyme assay of both wild type and AtSS1 and AtSS3 mutant extracts after treatment with DTT or DTTox, clearly showing that DTT is required for full SS activity (Table 3). Gel filtration of oxidised and reduced extracts followed by incubation with DTT or DTTox, respectively, demonstrated that the redox mediated changes in activity were mostly reversible, suggesting that AtSS1 and AtSS3 could be targets of redox regulation in Arabidopsis (Table 2). 2.10. Starch branching enzymes The Arabidopsis genome encodes three starch branching enzymes (BE) of which one (AtBE2) is responsible for the majority of the measurable activity in plant extracts [20]. The closest homologue of AtBE2 in wheat is SBEIIa (77% identity), which has been identified as a potential Trx target in wheat amyloplasts [5]. Zymograms of BE activities in Arabidopsis extracts revealed one major activity corresponding to AtBE2, that was only active under reducing conditions. Similar to the observation made for SS, this redox mediated change was reversible (Fig. 2). Table 3 Redox sensitivity of soluble starch synthases. Extracts of wild type (wt) and SS1 and SS3 mutants were treated with 20 mM DTT or DTTox, or water (control) supplemented with 2 mM each of TRXf1 and TRXm4 for 1 h at 25 C and immediately assayed for soluble starch synthase activity. Activity is given as a percentage of the DTT-treated wild type sample. Measurements are the means SE from five samples. Plant DTT (%) DTTox (%) Water (%) wt SS1 mutant SS3 mutant 100 7.8 49.0 2.5 49.5 3.8 10.1 1.3 1.63 1.4 13.7 2.7 13.0 2.8 0.94 2.1 24.6 4.6 M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 3. Discussion It has been known for some time that the rate of starch biosynthesis is controlled at least partially at the level of ADPglucose production by redox regulation of the AGPase enzyme. Production of ADP-glucose by AGPase is generally viewed as the first committed step in starch biosynthesis and the enzyme makes a considerable contribution to the control of flux through this pathway [32,33]. Despite increasing amounts of data from numerous in vitro studies pointing to a broader role of redox regulation in starch metabolism, the subject has never been comprehensively investigated. In this study we have surveyed the majority of chloroplastic enzymes known to be involved in starch metabolism in A. thaliana and have identified several redox sensitive enzyme activities. 3.1. Redox regulatory mechanisms A thiol-disulfide exchange can lead to subtle changes in the properties of an enzyme such as pH optimum and range, substrate affinity, and sensitivity to allosteric regulators. For example, reduction of spinach LDA broadens the pH range of activity by one unit in the alkaline range, making the reduced enzyme active at chloroplastic pH values (above pH 7.0) [15]. Reduction of AGPase changes the kinetic parameters of the enzyme, leading to increased sensitivity to the allosteric activator glycerate 3-phosphate and a decreased sensitivity to inhibition by Pi, thus complementing other regulatory mechanisms [7,34]. A thiol-disulfide exchange can potentially influence the formation of protein complexes. The Trx-regulated Calvin cycle enzymes GAPDH and PRK form a supramolecular complex with the protein CP12 under oxidising conditions [35] and starch biosynthetic enzymes can associate to form large enzyme complexes in amyloplasts [36]. Consequently, it is possible that the redox effects observed in the zymograms are caused by changes in protein complex formation leading to an altered position in the zymogram. At least for AtSS1 and AtSS3 this was not the case, as both enzymes could be reactivated at the same position in the gel after separation under oxidising conditions. In addition, it cannot be ruled out that a perceived redox sensitivity is a consequence of a thiol-disulfide exchange in another protein, which leads to an indirect effect on the activity of the analysed enzyme. For example, post-translational modification by phosphorylation has been suggested as a regulatory mechanism for many starch metabolising enzymes [10] and the controlling factors themselves (e.g. kinases and phosphatases) could be subject to redox regulation. Glutathionylation of proteins, and the reverse process catalysed by the glutaredoxins (Grx), has been proposed as an alternative mechanism of redox regulation. There is considerable overlap between the Grx- and Trx-interacting targets in vitro, including AGPase and several Calvin cycle enzymes, and the Grx and Trx pathways could serve complementary functions in redox regulation in vivo [37,38]. There is no evidence in the literature for a direct role of glutathionylation in leaf starch metabolism, however, based on the current study, such an effect cannot be ruled out and an inhibition of activity caused by glutathionylation in oxidized extracts could potentially be reversed by DTT treatment. Multiple factors might contribute to the regulation of an enzyme’s activity. Furthermore, the regulatory mechanisms might influence one another. Hence, manipulation of the redox conditions may not necessarily lead to a large change in enzyme activity if, under a given set of conditions, its activity and/or redox sensitivity is simultaneously affected by other factors. Since some factors, such as the presence of allosteric regulators or proteinaceous inhibitors/ activators, cannot be accurately controlled in plant extracts, any 93 verification and detailed analyses of redox sensitivity would require the recombinant enzyme for in vitro studies. 3.2. Identification of redox sensitive starch metabolising enzymes Starch biosynthesis in Arabidopsis requires the combined action of SSs and BEs, as well as a debranching activity provided by ISA [39]. Using zymograms, we observed an effect of modulating the redox conditions on all three classes of enzymes suggesting that starch biosynthesis is under redox control. Due to lack of a specific assay for AtISA1/AtISA2 activity in plant extracts [40], the redox sensitivity of this enzyme could not be verified outside the gelbased system. Similarly, we were unable to determine the activity of AtBE2 in plant extracts using the phosphorylase a stimulation method, possibly due to interference from endogenous degrading enzymes. For the SSs, the observation was confirmed by enzyme assays of wild type and SS mutants indicating that AtSS1 and AtSS3 are potential targets of redox regulation. The notion that SS activity is under redox control adds a significant layer of complexity to the control of starch biosynthesis, as it suggests that both the supply of ADP-glucose and its utilisation is co-ordinately regulated and coupled to light capture by the photosynthetic electron transport chain. The precise molecular mechanisms determining starch structure are not fully understood, but is a product of the combined activities of SS, BE and ISA isoforms [21,41,42]. Our findings raise the possibility that the structure of starch might be influenced by the redox status of the chloroplast by changes in the relative contributions of the different redox regulated isoforms. It has also been proposed from work in maize and wheat endosperm that both protein phosphorylation and protein complex formation involving SS and BE isoforms may play roles in controlling starch biosynthesis [36,42,43]. Redox regulation could act in parallel with such mechanisms to ensure correct synthesis of the starch granule, although there is as yet no evidence for such protein complex formation in leaves. Redox regulation of starch biosynthetic enzymes could also serve to ensure that the pathway of starch synthesis is not active during the dark period, preventing energy wastage in a futile cycle. The major starch degradation pathway in Arabidopsis involves the interdependent actions of the chloroplastic b-amylases AtBAM1 and AtBAM3 and the debranching enzyme AtISA3 [10,29,39]. A small but significant difference in AtISA3 activity was observed between reduced and oxidised extracts. If this is indicative of true redox sensitivity, it is possible that oxidation by DTTox is inefficient, so that the enzyme remains in a stable reduced form in the oxidized extracts. The previously reported redox sensitivity of AtBAM1 [12] was confirmed in zymograms of Arabidopsis leaf extracts. A second visible b-amylase activity corresponded to the cytosolic AtBAM5 and this enzyme was unaffected by DTT treatment and high concentrations of the oxidiser CuCl2 (data not shown). Enzyme assays of an AtBAM1 knock-out mutant suggested the presence of an additional redox sensitive b-amylase activity. AtBAM3 was previously identified as a major contributor to starch degradation [29] and total b-amylase activity in the double mutant AtBAM1/ AtBAM3 was insensitive to redox changes, suggesting that AtBAM3 itself, or a component influencing AtBAM3 activity, is redox sensitive. Due to the relatively small changes in total b-amylase activity measured in the AtBAM1 mutant and the extra steps required to sequentially oxidise and reduce the plant extract, it was not possible to reliable determine the reversibility of this redox reaction. Although a homology model of AtBAM3 identified three cysteine residues in close proximity to both each other and the active site, further experiments will be required to clarify the potential redox sensitivity of AtBAM3. 94 M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 AtAMY3 and AtLDA are part of a minor, alternative pathway that can support starch degradation in Arabidopsis, although the physiological significance of this pathway is unclear [39,40]. Both enzymes were sensitive to redox conditions and clearly activated by reduction in zymograms and enzyme assays. Furthermore, inactivation of AtLDA by oxidation was almost completely reversible by subsequent reduction. Interestingly, reduction of spinach LDA broadens the pH range of the enzyme, making it active at nighttime chloroplastic pH values (above pH 7.0) [15]. Spinach and wheat LDAs are unusual in that they exist as multiple interconvertible isomeric forms [15,16]. Different redox states of three cysteine residues, as either thiols or disulfides, were proposed as an explanation for the coexistence of multiple forms [15]. Given that spinach LDA does not appear to respond to Trx in vitro [15] and that only one cysteine is conserved between the redox sensitive LDAs from spinach, wheat and Arabidopsis, the redox sensitivity of this enzyme may represent an unusual adaptation to diurnal metabolism. 3.3. The role of redox regulation in starch metabolism Starch degradation in leaves includes an initial cycle of reversible glucan phosphorylation involving GWD and SEX4 [39,44]. Both of these enzymes are redox regulated and activated by Trx in vitro [11,13], suggesting that the initial attack on the starch granule is under redox control. The results presented here point towards a similar regulatory mechanism of the enzymes acting downstream of GWD/SEX4 and opens up the possibility that both of the established pathways of starch degradation in Arabidopsis are redox regulated and, surprisingly, activated by reduction. While reductive activation of enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis is intuitively relevant for starch deposition during active photosynthesis, the significance of reductive activation of starch degrading enzymes is less obvious. At least two explanations can be imagined. First, that redox regulation represents an adaptation to special conditions, such as abiotic or biotic stresses, which may require a change in the normal diurnal metabolism of starch to fulfil the altered needs of the plant and secondly, that some degrading enzymes carry out specialized functions in specific tissues (e.g. in amyloplasts of heterotrophic tissues) or at certain developmental stages. There is some evidence to support the idea of such specialised roles. Potato GWD has the most positive midpoint redox potential among known redox regulated enzymes (310 mV at pH 7.9) [11] suggesting that GWD exists primarily in the reduced, active form during a normal diurnal cycle as proposed by Edner et al. [45]. Any condition that alters the redox balance and results in a more oxidising environment could thus affect the activity of GWD and hence starch degradation. AtBAM1 is not required for normal starch degradation in leaves, but contributes to starch breakdown in the absence of the major b-amylase AtBAM3 [29]. A recent study suggested that AtBAM1 is required for starch degradation in guard cells during the day [17]. Furthermore, AtBAM1 expression and activity is induced by osmotic stress in mesophyll cells and evidence was provided for a role of AtBAM1 in a stress-induced pathway leading to starch degradation in the light [17]. Starch degradation in the light involving b-amylase activity has also been demonstrated under photorespiratory conditions in Arabidopsis [46] and b-amylase expression and activity is up-regulated and involved in production of maltose as a compatible solute in response to abiotic stress [47]. While reductive activation clearly requires reducing power, this does not necessarily come directly from photosynthesis. Reductive activation is possible when photoreduced Fdx is not available. In wheat amyloplasts, Fdx can be reduced by NADPH via ferredoxinNADP reductase and this metabolically reduced Fdx can provide reducing equivalents for downstream Trxs [5]. The NADPH itself is produced by the respiration of carbohydrates via the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway. This mechanism was suggested to couple photosynthesis in leaves to biosynthetic pathways in the amyloplasts of storage tissues via the availability of translocated sugars. However, reductive activation of enzymes can also occur in chloroplasts in the absence of light provided that NADPH is present. External feeding of sugars to Arabidopsis leaves in the dark increases the pool of reduced AGPase and the rate of starch biosynthesis, linking sugar availability and redox regulation [6,8]. This activation of AGPase is dependent on the plastidial NTRC, which uses NADPH as a source of reducing power [8,17]. Despite these observations, it is still unclear what mechanism would trigger the reductive activation of starch degrading enzymes, as starch breakdown is a process which supplies sugars in the dark, rather than being triggered by the presence of sugars. Simultaneous activation of both biosynthetic and degradative enzymes seems unlikely, so some as yet unidentified specificity in the activation pathways is to be expected. This could either be in the interaction between the reducing activator (e.g. Trx/NTRC) and the target enzyme or in the interaction with potential redox-regulated protein factors controlling activity by other post-translational mechanisms (see above). At the plant level, this could imply separation in terms of the signals (e.g. light or sugars) that lead to activation or the conditions under which such a regulation is required. The above examples and the results obtained in this study support the idea that redox regulation of enzyme activity plays a role in starch metabolism. This does not necessarily only include regulation of the normal diurnal cycle in leaves, but could be a mechanism for regulating starch metabolic pathways operating outside the normal diurnal cycle in heterotrophic or specialised tissues or in response to environmental signals. Further work will be needed to clarify the role and significance of redox regulation for both individual enzymes and the pathways in which they operate in planta. 4. Materials and methods 4.1. Plant material A. thaliana wild type Col-0 and mutants were grown from seed in potting compost in growth chambers at 20 C and 70% relative humidity with a 12/12 h photoperiod at a photon flux density of 120e150 mmol m2 s1. Leaves were harvested directly into liquid nitrogen 2 h before the end of the light period and kept at 80 C until analysis. 4.2. Zymograms Soluble proteins were extracted in buffer using a ground-glass homogeniser (200e400 mg fresh-weight (FW) per ml). Insoluble material was pelleted at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4 C and the supernatant was used immediately in zymogram experiments. Gels were prepared as previously described [48] using 0.2% (w/v) potato amylopectin (SigmaeAldrich 10118, Copenhagen, Denmark), 0.8e1.0% (w/v) glycogen (SigmaeAldrich G1508), or 1.0% (w/v) red pullulan (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland) as substrate in the separating gel. After electrophoresis at 4 C, gels were washed twice in incubation buffer for 15 min and subsequently incubated in the same buffer for 3e5 h at 37 C or up to 16 h at 25 C. Activities were revealed after staining with an iodine solution (0.34% I2, 0.68% KI (w/v)). Starch hydrolysing activities were extracted in 100 mM MOPS pH 7.2, 10% (v/v) glycerol and separated on 1% (w/v) amylopectin gels. Gels were washed and incubated in 100 mM Tris pH 7.0, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2. M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 Starch synthases were extracted in 100 mM Bicine pH 8.3, 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol and separated on gels containing 0.8% (w/ v) glycogen. Gels were washed in 100 mM Bicine pH 8.3, 0.5 M sodium citrate, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol and incubated in the same buffer supplemented with 2 mM ADP-glucose. Starch branching enzymes were extracted in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol and separated on a native gel with no substrate. Gels were incubated in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM glucose-1-phosphate, 2.5 mM AMP, 1 U/ml phosphorylase a from rabbit muscle (SigmaeAldrich P1261). 4.3. Enzyme assays Soluble proteins were extracted as described for the zymograms. Based on previous Trx activation experiments with potato GWD and AtBAM1 [11,12] extracts were supplemented with 2 mM each of recombinant Arabidopsis thioredoxins TRXf1 and TRXm4. Assay conditions were essentially as previously described [48] unless otherwise mentioned. Recombinant AtAMY3: Recombinant, purified AtAMY3 was obtained from a previous study [30]. Activity of a-amylase was assayed on amylopectin (5 mg/ml) in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 0.05 mg/ml BSA at 37 C. The assay was stopped by adding an equal volume of 0.5 M NaOH, and liberated reducing ends were determined using the MBTH method as described [49]. b-amylase: Plant material (200 mg FW/ml) was extracted in 50 mM MES pH 6.2, 10% (v/v) glycerol, and b-amylase activity was measured using a p-nitrophenol maltopentaoside substrate (PNPG5) according to manufacturer instructions (Betamyl Reagent, Megazyme). Activity was measured for 1 h at 30 C in a 300 ml total volume containing 50 mM MES pH 6.2, 1 mM EDTA and 25 ml Betamyl substrate. Limit dextrinase: Plant material (400 mg FW/ml) was extracted in 100 mM MOPS pH 7.2, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mg/ml polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP). The 200 ml assay mixture contained 50 mM MOPS pH 7.2 and 10 mg/ml pullulan (Megazyme). After a 4 h incubation at 30 C, the assay was stopped by adding 200 ml 0.5 M NaOH and reducing ends were determined using the MBTH method as described [49]. Disproportionating enzyme: Plant material (200 mg FW/ml) was extracted in 100 mM MOPS pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol. The 250 ml assay mixture contained 50 mM MOPS pH 6.8 and 60 mM maltotriose. Assays were stopped by boiling after 1 h at 25 C and liberated glucose was determined. Starch phosphorylase: Plant material (200 mg FW/ml) was extracted in 100 mM MOPS pH 7.0, 10% (v/v) glycerol. The 250 ml assay mixture contained 20 mM MOPS pH 7.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, 3.4 mM NAD, 2.5 mM glucose-1,6bisphosphate, 1 U/ml phosphoglucomutase, 1 U/ml glucose-6phosphate dehydrogenase (Roche Applied Science, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and the assay was started by adding 2.5 mg/ml amylopectin or 1 mM maltoheptaose as substrate. Activity, expressed as the production of NADH, was measured by monitoring the absorbance at 340 nm in a microplate reader. Isoamylase: Plant material (400 mg FW/ml) was extracted in 50 mM MOPS pH 7.2, 10% (v/v) glycerol and desalted on Sephadex G-25 gel filtration columns (NAP-5, GE Healthcare, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) equilibrated with extraction buffer. Debranching activity by AtISA3 was determined on b-limit dextrin essentially as described [40] except that commercial b-limit dextrin (Megazyme) was used as a starting point for the second round of b-amylase treatment. The 100 ml assay mixture contained 50 mM MOPS pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA and 2 mg/ml b-limit dextrin. Assays were stopped by boiling after 1 h at 30 C. Maltose and maltotriose release was quantified by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography. 95 Soluble starch synthase: Plant material (200 mg FW/ml) was extracted in 100 mM Bicine pH 8.3, 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol. Assays were performed in a final volume of 100 ml containing SS buffer (100 mM Bicine pH 8.3, 25 mM potassium acetate, 5 mM EDTA), 18 mg/ml amylopectin, 740 Bq (20 nCi) [14C]ADP-glucose, 1 mM ADP-glucose, and incubated for 30 min at 30 C. The reactions were stopped by heating at 90 C for 3 min. Excess [14C]ADPglucose was removed by anion-exchange on Dowex 1 8 200e400 Mesh (SigmaeAldrich) columns. Radioactivity incorporated into amylopectin was determined by scintillation counting after addition of 3 ml scintillation fluid. NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase: Assays were carried out in microtiter plates at 25 C in a 250 ml volume containing 100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.2 mM NADPH, 1 mM oxaloacetic acid. The rate of NADPH consumption was followed spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. 4.4. Redox manipulations Redox titration of Arabidopsis extracts was carried out under aerobic conditions at 25 C by incubation with different ratios of reduced to oxidised DTT in a total concentration of 40 mM for 1 h. The redox potentials were calculated using the Nernst equation and a midpoint redox potential of DTT at pH 7.9 of 380 mV. For demonstrations of redox reversibility, extracts were treated with reductant (20 mM DTT) or oxidant (20 mM DTTox or 100 mM CuCl2) for 1 h at 25 C, desalted on Sephadex G-25 gel filtration columns (NAP-5, GE Healthcare), and then subjected to the reverse treatment for 1 h. The oxidant CuCl2 was used when DTTox had no apparent effect on enzyme activity and it has previously been successfully used as an inactivator of potato GWD [11]. Watertreated controls were used as a baseline for activity in the untreated extracts and were treated exactly as the other samples except water replaced the added reductant or oxidant. Recombinant AtAMY3 was stored as the inactive form in the absence of reductant and activated by treatment with 20 mM DTT for 20 min at 25 C. 4.5. Production of recombinant thioredoxins The open reading frames of A. thaliana thioredoxins f1 (AT3G02730) and m4 (AT3G15360), excluding the predicted chloroplast transit peptide (amino acids 1e59 and 1e76 for f1 and m4, respectively), were synthesised as codon-optimised constructs for expression in E. coli. The ORFs were cloned directly into the expression vector pET15b and expressed as N-terminally 6xHistagged proteins in E. coli BL21-CodonPlus (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies, Basel, Switzerland). Expression was induced by 1 mM IPTG and cells were harvested after 4 h of induction at 30 C. Cells were disrupted by sonication in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.05% (v/v) b-mercaptoethanol). His-tagged proteins were purified on a 1 ml nickel-chelating resin column using the ProBond Purification System (Invitrogen, Zug, Switzerland). The bound thioredoxins were eluted with a stepwise gradient of imidazole in elution buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 100e500 mM imidazole) and stored at 80 C in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10% (v/v) glycerol. 4.6. Computational analyses The AGI gene codes and any alternative names for the proteins examined in this study were as follows: AMY3 (AT1G69830); BAM1 (BMY7, AT3G23920); BAM3 (BMY8/ctBMY, AT4G17090); BAM5 (BMY1/RAM1, AT4G15210); BE2 (SBE2.2, AT5G03650); DPE1 (AT5G 64860); ISA1 (AT2G39930); ISA2 (DBE1, AT1G03310); ISA3 (AT4G 96 M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 09020); LDA (PUL, AT5G04360); PHS1 (PHO1, AT3G29320); PHS2 (PHO2, AT3G46970); SS1 (AT5G24300); SS3 (AT1G11720). Amino acid alignments were produced using the ClustalW2 tool at EBI (www.ebi. ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2) with default settings and visualised using Jalview (www.jalview.org). All amino acid numberings include the putative chloroplast transit peptides. Structure modelling was performed using the automated mode in Swiss-Model (www.swissmodel. expasy.org) [50]. The final models were based on the following templates (PDB ID, www.pdb.org); BAM3, 1BYB; LDA, 2Y4S. Role of the funding sources The funding sources have had no role in any stages of this study. Acknowledgements We thank Professor Alison M. Smith (John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK) for her donation of starch synthase mutants. The financial support from The Danish Research Council for Technology and Production Sciences (grant no. 274-06-0312), The Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation (to the VKR Research Centre Pro-Active Plants), and ETH Zürich is gratefully acknowledged. Appendix A. Supplementary material Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.06.017. References [1] A.M. Smith, M. Stitt, Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth, Plant Cell and Environment 30 (2007) 1126e1149. [2] M. Stitt, J. Lunn, B. Usadel, Arabidopsis and primary photosynthetic metabolism - more than the icing on the cake, Plant Journal 61 (2010) 1067e1091. [3] A. Graf, A.M. Smith, Starch and the clock: the dark side of plant productivity, Trends in Plant Science 16 (2011) 169e175. [4] P. Schurmann, B.B. Buchanan, The ferredoxin/thioredoxin system of oxygenic photosynthesis, Antioxidants Redox Signaling 10 (2008) 1235e1274. [5] Y. Balmer, W.H. Vensel, N. Cai, W. Manieri, P. Schurmann, W.J. Hurkman, B.B. Buchanan, A complete ferredoxin/thioredoxin system regulates fundamental processes in amyloplasts, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (2006) 2988e2993. [6] J.H.M. Hendriks, A. Kolbe, Y. Gibon, M. Stitt, P. Geigenberger, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is activated by posttranslational redox-modification in response to light and to sugars in leaves of Arabidopsis and other plant species, Plant Physiology 133 (2003) 838e849. [7] P. Geigenberger, Regulation of starch biosynthesis in response to a fluctuating environment, Plant Physiology 155 (2011) 1566e1577. [8] J. Michalska, H. Zauber, B.B. Buchanan, F.J. Cejudo, P. Geigenberger, NTRC links built-in thioredoxin to light and sucrose in regulating starch synthesis in chloroplasts and amyloplasts, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (2009) 9908e9913. [9] F. Montrichard, F. Alkhalfioui, H. Yano, W.H. Vensel, W.J. Hurkman, B.B. Buchanan, Thioredoxin targets in plants: the first 30 years, Journal of Proteomics 72 (2009) 452e474. [10] O. Kotting, J. Kossmann, S.C. Zeeman, J.R. Lloyd, Regulation of starch metabolism: the age of enlightenment? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13 (2010) 321e329. [11] R. Mikkelsen, K.E. Mutenda, A. Mant, P. Schurmann, A. Blennow, AlphaGlucan, water dikinase (GWD): a plastidic enzyme with redox-regulated and coordinated catalytic activity and binding affinity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (2005) 1785e1790. [12] F. Sparla, A. Costa, F. Lo Schiavo, P. Pupillo, P. Trost, Redox regulation of a novel plastid-targeted beta-amylase of Arabidopsis, Plant Physiology 141 (2006) 840e850. [13] D.M. Silver, L.P. Silva, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, M.A. Glaring, D.C. Schriemer, G.B. Moorhead, Insight into the redox regulation of the phosphoglucan phosphatase SEX4 involved in starch degradation, FEBS Journal (2012), in press, PMID: 22372537. [14] W. Witt, J.J. Sauter, Purification and characterization of alpha-amylase from poplar leaves, Phytochemistry 41 (1996) 365e372. [15] I. Schindler, A. Renz, F.X. Schmid, E. Beck, Activation of spinach pullulanase by reduction results in a decrease in the number of isomeric forms, Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology 1548 (2001) 175e186. [16] A. Repellin, M. Baga, R.N. Chibbar, In vitro pullulanase activity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) limit-dextrinase type starch debranching enzyme is modulated by redox conditions, Journal of Cereal Science 47 (2008) 302e309. [17] C. Valerio, A. Costa, L. Marri, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, P. Pupillo, P. Trost, F. Sparla, Thioredoxin-regulated beta-amylase (BAM1) triggers diurnal starch degradation in guard cells, and in mesophyll cells under osmotic stress, Journal of Experimental Botany 62 (2011) 545e555. [18] J.H. Critchley, S.C. Zeeman, T. Takaha, A.M. Smith, S.M. Smith, A critical role for disproportionating enzyme in starch breakdown is revealed by a knock-out mutation in Arabidopsis, Plant Journal 26 (2001) 89e100. [19] T. Delatte, M. Trevisan, M.L. Parker, S.C. Zeeman, Arabidopsis mutants Atisa1 and Atisa2 have identical phenotypes and lack the same multimeric isoamylase, which influences the branch point distribution of amylopectin during starch synthesis, Plant Journal 41 (2005) 815e830. [20] S. Dumez, F. Wattebled, D. Dauvillee, D. Delvalle, V. Planchot, S.G. Ball, C. D’Hulst, Mutants of Arabidopsis lacking starch branching enzyme II substitute plastidial starch synthesis by cytoplasmic maltose accumulation, Plant Cell 18 (2006) 2694e2709. [21] X. Zhang, N. Szydlowski, D. Delvalle, C. D’Hulst, M.G. James, A.M. Myers, Overlapping functions of the starch synthases SSII and SSIII in amylopectin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, Bmc Plant Biology 8 (2008). [22] L. Marri, P. Trost, P. Pupillo, F. Sparla, Reconstitution and properties of the recombinant glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase/CP12/phosphoribulokinase supramolecular complex of Arabidopsis, Plant Physiology 139 (2005) 1433e1443. [23] F. Sparla, M. Zaffagnini, N. Wedel, R. Scheibe, P. Pupillo, P. Trost, Regulation of photosynthetic GAPDH dissected by mutants, Plant Physiology 138 (2005) 2210e2219. [24] R.S. Hutchison, Q. Groom, D.R. Ort, Differential effects of chilling-induced photooxidation on the redox regulation of photosynthetic enzymes, Biochemistry 39 (2000) 6679e6688. [25] R.S. Hutchison, D.R. Ort, Measurement of equilibrium midpoint potentials of thiol/disulfide regulatory groups on thioredoxin-activated chloroplast enzymes, in: Biothiols, Pt B, Academic Press Inc, San Diego, 1995, pp. 220e228. [26] F. Sparla, P. Pupillo, P. Trost, The C-terminal extension of glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase subunit B acts as an autoinhibitory domain regulated by thioredoxins and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (2002) 44946e44952. [27] V. Collin, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, C. Marchand, M. Hirasawa, J.M. Lancelin, D.B. Knaff, M. Miginiac-Maslow, The Arabidopsis plastidial thioredoxins e new functions and new insights into specificity, Journal of Biological Chemistry 278 (2003) 23747e23752. [28] Y. Balmer, A. Koller, G. del Val, W. Manieri, P. Schurmann, B.B. Buchanan, Proteomics gives insight into the regulatory function of chloroplast thioredoxins, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (2003) 370e375. [29] D.C. Fulton, M. Stettler, T. Mettler, C.K. Vaughan, J. Li, P. Francisco, D. Gil, H. Reinhold, S. Eicke, G. Messerli, G. Dorken, K. Halliday, A.M. Smith, S.M. Smith, S.C. Zeeman, Beta-AMYLASE4, a noncatalytic protein required for starch breakdown, acts upstream of three active beta-amylases in Arabidopsis chloroplasts, Plant Cell 20 (2008) 1040e1058. [30] M.A. Glaring, M.J. Baumann, M. Abou Hachem, H. Nakai, N. Nakai, D. Santelia, B.W. Sigurskjold, S.C. Zeeman, A. Blennow, B. Svensson, Starch-binding domains in the CBM45 family - low-affinity domains from glucan, water dikinase and alpha-amylase involved in plastidial starch metabolism, FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1175e1185. [31] S. Streb, T. Delatte, M. Umhang, S. Eicke, M. Schorderet, D. Reinhardt, S.C. Zeeman, Starch granule biosynthesis in Arabidopsis is abolished by removal of all debranching enzymes but restored by the subsequent removal of an endoamylase, Plant Cell 20 (2008) 3448e3466. [32] H.E. Neuhaus, M. Stitt, Control analysis of photosynthate partitioning - impact of reduced activity of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase or plastid phosphoglucomutase on the fluxes to starch and sucrose inArabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh, Planta 182 (1990) 445e454. [33] N. Haedrich, Y. Gibon, C. Schudoma, T. Altmann, J.E. Lunn, M. Stitt, Use of TILLING and robotised enzyme assays to generate an allelic series of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with altered ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity, Journal of Plant Physiology 168 (2011) 1395e1405. [34] A. Tiessen, J.H.M. Hendriks, M. Stitt, A. Branscheid, Y. Gibon, E.M. Farre, P. Geigenberger, Starch synthesis in potato tubers is regulated by posttranslational redox modification of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase: a novel regulatory mechanism linking starch synthesis to the sucrose supply, Plant Cell 14 (2002) 2191e2213. [35] L. Marri, M. Zaffagnini, V. Collin, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, S.D. Lemaire, P. Pupillo, F. Sparla, M. Miginiac-Maslow, P. Trost, Prompt and easy activation by specific thioredoxins of Calvin cycle enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana associated in the GAPDH/CP12/PRK supramolecular complex, Molecular Plant 2 (2009) 259e269. [36] T.A. Hennen-Bierwagen, Q. Lin, F. Grimaud, V. Planchot, P.L. Keeling, M.G. James, A.M. Myers, Proteins from multiple metabolic pathways associate with starch biosynthetic enzymes in high molecular weight complexes: a model for regulation of carbon allocation in maize amyloplasts, Plant Physiology 149 (2009) 1541e1559. [37] K. Chibani, J. Couturier, B. Selles, J.-P. Jacquot, N. Rouhier, The chloroplastic thiol reducing systems: dual functions in the regulation of M.A. Glaring et al. / Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58 (2012) 89e97 [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] carbohydrate metabolism and regeneration of antioxidant enzymes, emphasis on the poplar redoxin equipment, Photosynthesis Research 104 (2010) 75e99. L. Michelet, M. Zaffagnini, V. Massot, E. Keryer, H. Vanacker, M. MiginiacMaslow, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, S.D. Lemaire, Thioredoxins, glutaredoxins, and glutathionylation: new crosstalks to explore, Photosynthesis Research 89 (2006) 225e245. S.C. Zeeman, J. Kossmann, A.M. Smith, Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants, Annual Review of Plant Biology 61 (2010) 209e234. T. Delatte, M. Umhang, M. Trevisan, S. Eicke, D. Thorneycroft, S.M. Smith, S.C. Zeeman, Evidence for distinct mechanisms of starch granule breakdown in plants, Journal of Biological Chemistry 281 (2006) 12050e12059. S.C. Zeeman, S.M. Smith, A.M. Smith, The diurnal metabolism of leaf starch, Biochemical Journal 401 (2007) 13e28. I.J. Tetlow, Starch biosynthesis in developing seeds, Seed Science Research 21 (2011) 5e32. I.J. Tetlow, K.G. Beisel, S. Cameron, A. Makhmoudova, F. Liu, N.S. Bresolin, R. Wait, M.K. Morell, M.J. Emes, Analysis of protein complexes in wheat amyloplasts reveals functional interactions among starch biosynthetic enzymes, Plant Physiology 146 (2008) 1878e1891. 97 [44] O. Kotting, D. Santelia, C. Edner, S. Eicke, T. Marthaler, M.S. Gentry, S. Comparot-Moss, J. Chen, A.M. Smith, M. Steup, G. Ritte, S.C. Zeeman, STARCH-EXCESS4 is a laforin-like phosphoglucan phosphatase required for starch degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant Cell 21 (2009) 334e346. [45] C. Edner, J. Li, T. Albrecht, S. Mahlow, M. Hejazi, H. Hussain, F. Kaplan, C. Guy, S.M. Smith, M. Steup, G. Ritte, Glucan, water dikinase activity stimulates breakdown of starch granules by plastidial beta-amylases, Plant Physiology 145 (2007) 17e28. [46] S.E. Weise, S.M. Schrader, K.R. Kleinbeck, T.D. Sharkey, Carbon balance and circadian regulation of hydrolytic and phosphorolytic breakdown of transitory starch, Plant Physiology 141 (2006) 879e886. [47] F. Kaplan, D.Y. Sung, C.L. Guy, Roles of beta-amylase and starch breakdown during temperatures stress, Physiologia Plantarum 126 (2006) 120e128. [48] S.C. Zeeman, F. Northrop, A.M. Smith, T. ap Rees, A starch-accumulating mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana deficient in a chloroplastic starch-hydrolysing enzyme, Plant Journal 15 (1998) 357e365. [49] G.E. Anthon, D.M. Barrett, Determination of reducing sugars with 3-methyl-2benzothiazolinonehydrazone, Analytical Biochemistry 305 (2002) 287e289. [50] K. Arnold, L. Bordoli, J. Kopp, T. Schwede, The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling, Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 195e201.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz