12/20/2013 Julie Grossman, Sarah Seehaver, Thanwalee Sooksa-Nguan and Mary Parr Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, U.S.A. Effects of Vicia villosa cover crop inoculation on rhizobia ecology in organic farming systems 1 12/20/2013 Sarah Seehaver Mary Parr Thanwalee ‘JiJY’ Sooksa-nguan Hairy vetch (Vicia villosa); winter annual legume cover crop Study 1: Rhizobia population diversity and inoculant effectiveness Study 2: Growth chamber evaluation of genetically-distinct rhizobia accessions 2 12/20/2013 Cover crop use in organics §205.205 Crop Rotation Standard, which states that a "producer must implement a crop rotation including but not limited to sod, cover crops, green manure crops, and catch crops. NOP, 2007 3 12/20/2013 Legume based organic systems N2 Crop residue BNF Mineral Nitrogen Decomposition 4 12/20/2013 Parr et al., Agronomy Journal 2011 Legume Biomass N (kg ha-1) 250.0 200.0 Vicia villosa (Hairy vetch) Trifolium incarnatum (Crimson Clover) 150.0 Pisum sativum (Austrian Winter Pea) 100.0 50.0 0.0 All cover crops terminated in mid-May except those denoted by * terminated in mid April 5 12/20/2013 Who inoculates? Organic systems are dependent on successful nodulation and BNF, and many organic systems are inoculated Recent survey of 180 growers in the states of North and South Carolina, U.S.A. (O’Connell, 2013) 46% use inoculants regularly 32% do not use inoculants 16% use inoculants only when introducing new legume 6 12/20/2013 N15 Natural Abundance measurements of V. villosa show this species to outperform other cover crop legumes in BNF across 3 site locations (Parr, 2011) Study objectives: Characterize rhizobia isolated from field inoculated V. villosa root nodules and from uninoculated soils to determine population diversity Evaluate a subset of genetically-distinct rhizobia accessions for symbiotic effectiveness and performance Parr, M.; Grossman,J.M.; Reberg-Horton, S.C.; Brinton, C. and Crozier, C. 2011. Nitrogen fixation of legume cover crops in no-till organic corn production, Agronomy Journal 103(6), 1578-1590. 7 12/20/2013 Five Vicia villosa ecotypes: Study 1: Experimental Design • Auburn Early Cover (AUE) • Auburn Merit (AUM) • Winter hardy Early Cover (EAR) • USDA Purple Prosperity (PRO) • USDA Purple Bounty (BOU) At each of 3 sites: Nodules collected from each inoculated treatment AUM AU E EAR PRO BOU Soil collected from noninoculated perimeter for trapping of rhizobia Study 1 8 12/20/2013 Methods: inoculated plant nodules • Early spring three root systems excavated and one nodule removed from each • Total 142 nodules from field-inoculated plants Study 1 9 12/20/2013 Methods: resident rhizobia isolation V. villosa planted in sterile 1:1 sand/vermiculite mixture to trap rhizobia 50d of growth RCBD design Inoculated with 1mL of 5-1 soil dilutions (Bala, 2000) Dilutions of non-inoculated soil collected from field perimeters Five nodules randomly selected from each plant = 240 nodules representing resident strains Study 1 10 12/20/2013 Methods: Rhizobia Isolation Nodule Study 1 Rhizobia Colony 11 12/20/2013 Methods: Rep-PCR Strain Identification Each lane = one Rhizobia strain 1: Strains screened for nifH (nitrogen fixing) gene Primers used: 5'- TAC GGN AAR GGS GGN ATC GGC AA -3' and reverse primer sequence: 5'- AGC ATG TCY TCS AGY TCN TCC A -3’ 2: Genomic fingerprinting analysis using rep-BOX PCR primer 3: GelCompar Sofware Sorts strains by similarities in fingerprint patterns 4. Partial gene sequencing (620-bp) of nodC: nodCfor540 – nodCrev1160primers (Sarita et al, 2005) Study 1 Similar genetically related Different genetically distinct 12 12/20/2013 Cosine coefficient (Opt:1.00%) (Tol 5.0%-5.0%) (H>0.0% S>0.0%) [0.0%-100.0%] 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 BOX A1R 35 30 BOX A1R . Inoc 17 Inoculant . Inoc 18 Inoculant . Inoc 24 Inoculant . Inoc 11 Inoculant . Inoc 13 Inoculant . Inoc 10 Inoculant . Inoc 14 Inoculant . Inoc 9 Inoculant . Inoc 12 Inoculant . Inoc 4 Inoculant . Inoc 5 Inoculant . Inoc 8 Inoculant . Inoc 6 Inoculant . Inoc 7 Study 1 Isolated from commercial inoculant Inoculant . 149 Piedmont AU Merit . 163 CEFS/C2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 102 Tidewater/O2 . 108 CEFS/C2 EAR Native . 211 CEFS/C2 Early Cover Native . 158 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit . 159 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit . 140 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 113 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 142 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 120 Piedmont EAR Native . 203 Piedmont EAR Native . 134 Piedmont Early Cover Native . 266 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 171 Piedmont Early Cover Native . 265 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 263 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 256 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 257 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 135 Piedmont Early Cover Native . 195 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 196 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 231 Piedmont EAR Native . 199 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 150 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 151 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 254 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 186 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit . 187 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit . 160 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit . 229 Piedmont EAR Native . 335 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit Native . 239 CEFS/C2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 338 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 340 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 341 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 339 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 337 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 278 Tidewater/O2 Purple Prosperi.Native . 197 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 206 Tidewater/O2 EAR Native . 144 Tidewater/O2 EAR Native . 117 Piedmont EAR Native . 204 Piedmont EAR Native . 245 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit Native . 280 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 121 Piedmont EAR Native . 200 Piedmont EAR Native . 249 Tidewater/O2 EAR Native . 227 Piedmont EAR Native . 264 Tidewater/O2 Early Cover Native . 244 Tidewater/O2 AU Merit Native . 99 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 105 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 079 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 087 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 094 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 090 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 091 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 092 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 097 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 095 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 088 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 72 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 73 Tidewater/O2 Field/Inoculated . 190 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 191 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 192 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 357 Piedmont . 347 Piedmont . 342 Piedmont EAR Native . 344 Piedmont EAR Native . 133 Piedmont Early Cover Native . 222 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 328 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 138 Piedmont Purple Prosperi.Native . 282 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 292 Piedmont AU Merit Native . 174 Piedmont Early Cover Native . 350 Piedmont . 201 Piedmont EAR Native . 202 Piedmont EAR Native . 273 CEFS/C2 AU Merit Native . Inoc 2 Native Field/Inoculated Native strains Isolated from field inoculated plants Field/Inoculated Field/Inoculated Mixed native and inoculated strains Phylogenetic tree of rhizobia strains Commercial inoculants showed differences in fingerprint banding patterns from strains isolated from nodules Rhizobia from inoculated soils generally clustered with rhizobia from un-inoculated soils From phylogenetic tree 25 genetically distinct rhizobia were selected for further analysis Field/Inoculated Inoculant 13 12/20/2013 Sequencing of NodC revealed lack of match with inoculant strains Rhizobia from Inoculated field-grown plants Commercial inoculant 14 12/20/2013 Study 2: Strain evaluation Experimental Design Hairy vetch seeds surface sterilized and planted in sterile leonard jars in a growth chamber. Bottom watered using N-free Hoagland nutrient solution (Broughton and Dilworth, 1971) The 25 selected strains grown in TY broth and cell culture used as inoculant. Design: RCBD with four replicate units and 10 replicates of uninoculated plants 50d growth then assessed for nodulation and growth parameters Study 2 15 12/20/2013 Nodule mass per unit plant biomass (mg) Nodule number per unit plant biomass Plant nitrogen (%) HV 342 HV 342 HV 341 HV 341 HV 341 HV 338 HV 338 HV 338 HV 337 HV 337 HV 337 HV 332 HV 332 HV 304 HV 304 HV 278 HV 278 HV 263 HV 263 HV 257 HV 257 HV 256 HV 256 HV 229 HV 229 HV 227 HV 227 HV 227 HV 202 HV 202 HV 202 HV 201 HV 201 HV 201 HV 133 HV 133 HV 133 HV 120 HV 120 HV 120 HV 357 HV 357 HV 347 HV 347 HV 099 HV 099 HV 079 HV 079 HV 072 HV 072 C 13 C 13 C 10 C 10 C 10 C 05 C 05 C 05 C 03 C 03 C 03 Native rhizobia strains HV 342 HV 332 HV 304 HV 278 HV 263 HV 257 HV 256 HV 229 Field inoculated HV 357 HV 347 HV 099 HV 079 HV 072 C 13 0 20 40 60 80 0 100 200 300 400 500 Surrogate for nitrogen fixation 0 2 4 6 Study 2 16 12/20/2013 Plants inoculated with strains from commercial sources (inoculant or inoculatedplants) had higher N concentrations Effect of rhizobia source on V. villosa nitrogen concentration (%N) * * % N of plants inoculated with rhizobia from each source Study 2 Commercial inoculant Inoculated plants Native soil 17 12/20/2013 Conclusions • Inoculated hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) contain nodule rhizobia that are genetically dissimilar to those in the original source inoculant • Sequencing of the nodC region of a selection of 25 strains show all strains to be Rhizobium leguminosarum • Assessment of strain performance show resident strains to be both poor and strong performers in terms of plant growth. • Visit poster number 1900 (Seehaver) for the sister study evaluating inoculant effectiveness and genetic diversity 18 12/20/2013 A lab isn’t a team without its students….. Thanks! Projects supported by the Fulbright and NIFA Integrated Organics Programs 19
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz