CITY OF VICTORIA
PARK MASTER PLAN
A Comprehensive Park, Trail and Open Space Plan
2005-2020
December 2005
Prepared by the City of Victoria and
MK Land Corporation
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Acknowledgements
This group comprised the Master Plan’s project team that consisted of the following
individuals:
City of Victoria
Kristine Mock – Supervisor of Parks and Recreation
Stephen T. Sarvi – City Administrator
David Urbia – Interim City Administrator
Park Committee
Dan Barsness
Mary Erickson
Ann Hoelscher
Jeff Hohertz
Jerald P. Moja
Terrence E. Bishop - Council Liaison
MK Land Corporation
Mark Kaltsas – Project Coordinator
City of Victoria staff and the consultant worked together to provide the background
information. The Park Committee provided feedback and input regarding the “big
picture” ideas that they wanted to see incorporated into the plan. Together the project
team addressed the many issues facing the city and developed a plan that addressed those
issues.
2
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Table of Contents
I.
Executive Summary
A. Park System Vision
B. Big Ideas
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
II.
Master Plan Purpose
Page 9
III.
Understanding Victoria
A. Background
B. Related Planning Efforts Summary
C. Demographic Trends Summary
D. Acquisition of Park Land
E. 2004 Park and Recreation Community Survey Summary
Page 10
Page 10
Page 10
Page 11
Page 14
Page 14
IV.
Park System Organization
A. Organizational Format
B. Level of Service Summary
C. Current Park Inventory - General Observations and Reactions
Page 17
Page 17
Page 17
Page 20
V.
Existing Park System
A. Analysis of Conditions
B. Existing Facilities
C. Existing Trails
Page 22
Page 22
Page 29
Page 30
VI.
Future Park System
A. Future Park Development
B. Future Facility Development
C. Future Trail Development
Page 33
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
VII.
Regional Opportunities
Page 37
VIII. General Guidelines and Standards
A. Programming Balance
B. Architectural Standards
C. Park Design Maintenance Standards
D. Field Design, Maintenance, and Replacement Standards
E. Equipment Design, Maintenance, and Replacement Standards
F. Trail Design, Maintenance, and Replacement Standards
G. Landscape Design, Maintenance, and Replacement Standards
Page 39
Page 39
Page 39
Page 42
Page 42
Page 44
Page 46
Page 47
IX.
Page 49
Page 49
Page 50
Implementation and Prioritization
A. Priority/Phasing of Park Development
B. Priority of Big Ideas
3
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Table of Contents (Continued)
C. General Timeline of Trigger Points for Big Ideas
Page 51
X.
Appendices
A. Background
B. Related Studies
C. 2004 Community Survey Raw Data
Page 55
Page 55
Page 56
Page 60
XI.
Figures
1. Population
2. Park Inventory
3. Facilities Inventory
4. Field/Court Design Standards
5. Baseball Field
6. Basketball Court
7. Football/Lacrosse Field
8. Tennis Court
9. Typical Green Ribbon Plan
10. Typical Green Ribbon Section
11. Typical Neighborhood Park
12. Typical Playground Plan
Page 65
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 79
Page 70
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
XII.
Maps
1. Big Ideas
2. Regional Opportunities
3. Trails Map
4. Parks Map
5. Composite Park/Trail Map
4
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
I.
December 22, 2005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Victoria has a rich history of planning. Aspects of community planning date back to the
1850s when Michael Diethelm and his brother Carl decided where to construct their
homes and eventually the community church. Modern planning commenced in 1966
when the city drafted a zoning ordinance and continued in the early 1970s when the first
Comprehensive Land Use Plan was prepared. Many past and current planning efforts
focus on parks and open space as an integral component in Victoria’s development and
growth.
Victoria has long referred to itself as the City of Lakes and Parks. The city initially
developed a large community park in what was originally the center of the city. Victoria
has long been associated with Carver Park Preserve. Parks, open space and trails
contribute significantly to the city’s image of a small town intent on preserving the rural
heritage of the community. The 1998 and 2004 Comprehensive Plans, along with the
2002 South Sub Area Study, have helped to set the stage for a park master plan document
which will focus on physical and programmatic needs and standards rather than statistical
and monetary analysis and administrative planning.
Many of the concepts developed in this plan have been discussed throughout the last
fifteen years or longer. Victoria has long recognized that its need for parks and open
space must be integrated into partnerships with neighboring municipalities, regional park
districts, the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and local school districts.
Within the past ten years development and growth have threatened to change the face of
Victoria’s rural character. In spite of this steady increase of new development, Victoria
has been able to use this growth and development as a valuable asset that has aided in the
development of parks, open spaces and trails. Within the past several years the city has
begun to expand into adjacent Laketown Township. With this ongoing expansion, the
city has determined it necessary to step back and develop a comprehensive park, trails
and open space master plan that will guide the development of the city for the next fifteen
years. Given this opportunity, the City of Victoria has commissioned this Park Master
Plan.
A.
Park System Vision
We envision the City of Victoria, the City of Lakes and Parks, as a place where parks,
recreation and environmental conservation efforts enhance the quality of life. This
Master Plan should offer an opportunity to improve, develop and create a system of
places safely and innovatively linked through a network of planned open spaces and
sensitively managed green space corridors. This system should provide for both
recreational opportunities and the protection and enhancement of environmental
resources. It is the goal of this Master Plan to project a Vision of the city park system
through the year 2020.
5
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
“System” becomes a key to this plan. This plan sets forth the development of the park
system which when completed will form a relationship between the living and crafted
environments. This system will not be a random collection of parks and facilities but
rather a fluid series of spaces and amenities. The users of this system will be able to flow
between active and passive recreational opportunities by way of a Green Ribbon system
(See Figures 9 and 10). Development of this system will be in concert with the
continuing development of residential, commercial and industrial areas.
B.
Big Ideas
Beyond planning future park development and maintenance of the current park system,
this plan also includes “Big Ideas.” Based on geographical opportunities and citizen
priorities, each of the Big Ideas is presented as a planning challenge for the community.
The Big Ideas described below in priority order are those pieces that when thoroughly
integrated will form a holistic plan and a distinguished park system.
ƒ
Trail Connectivity
ƒ
The connectivity of the trail and park system is crucial to the vision of an
interconnected community. As the park system develops, it should have as a
central feature “connectedness”. This “connectedness” should be achieved
through a series of parks and trails woven together with the concept of a
Green Ribbon. The ultimate goal should be seamless access within the park
and trail system.
ƒ Large Urban Park
ƒ
ƒ
Waterfront Park
ƒ
ƒ
It is the belief of the Park and Recreation Committee that Victoria will need a
large urban park to serve the southern portions of the community as it expands
southward. A large urban park would range from 75 to 100 acres in size. It
would consist of open spaces, environmentally significant spaces and areas
designed specifically to meet the resident’s recreational needs.
The Park and Recreation Committee believe that Victoria, “The City of Lakes
and Parks”, should have a park that contains a waterfront park with swimming
and other water activities available for public use. Finding a suitable location
of this park may be a challenge, but should be a high priority of the city.
Green Ribbon System
ƒ
The Park and Recreation Committee believe that a greenway consisting of
landscaped areas and adjoining trails should be integral to the park and trail
system. A Green Ribbon is proposed to be a unique greenway which would provide
6
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
a seamless connection between parks, open spaces and residential neighborhoods and
would consist of a trail in concert with open spaces and natural corridors. This
feature should utilize existing natural amenities such as woodlands, wetlands, lakes,
ponds and streams. The width of the corridor will vary based on actual field
conditions and development layout. The minimum width of the corridor should be
no less than 30 feet and will often be greater. A Green Ribbon should include a
minimum corridor width of 30 feet, a bituminous trail or regional trail and any of the
following amenities:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
open play areas
woodland areas
wetland areas
lakes and ponds
connection to public roads
connection to other local or regional trails
waterfront access
schools
ƒ Urban Town Square
ƒ
ƒ
Lake Tamarack Park Preserve
ƒ
ƒ
The town square should be located within the Central Business District and
will become the central gathering place for the community. This identifiable
landmark should serve as the hub for business, civic events, cultural festivals,
exhibits and other entertainment within the city. It will provide a place for
relaxation, a retreat for downtown workers and shoppers and will function as a
unifying visual element.
Lake Tamarack is a highly pristine environmental lake that should be
preserved. Majestic stands of oak, maple, basswood and pine as well as an
upland meadow and wetlands provide habitat for a diverse population of
birds, mammals, amphibians, and native plants. The deepest lake in Carver
County supports a healthy lake ecosystem and fishery. Low impact
recreational opportunities are compatible with the long term goals of the
preserve. Protect the water quality of the lake. Vigorously prevent water
pollution. Encourage a healthy fishery, waterfowl habitat, and native flora
and fauna. Value the scenic beauty of the preserve, trail corridors, and
buffers.
Victoria’s Gateways
ƒ
Victoria’s Gateways will provide to all traveling on key roads into the city, a
welcoming sense of entry, a warm thank you and an invitation to return to our
community. The gateways will ensure that the distinction is made when
entering and leaving Victoria. The gateways will be strategically located,
highly visible, impeccably landscaped and should include signage which
7
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
distinguishes Victoria from the surrounding communities. The Gateways will
also provide key linkages between Victoria’s Green Ribbon and regional park
systems.
ƒ
Sports Complex
ƒ
As the city grows, the need for a centralized sports outdoor complex meeting
the sporting needs of the community will also grow. This facility will be in
addition to the already developed and future community parks in Victoria.
This complex should include lighting and fields for various outdoor sporting
activities such as soccer, baseball, softball and tennis. The complex shall be
located in an area that will include a buffer from the lighting, traffic, noise and
activity into the later evening hours.
8
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
II.
December 22, 2005
MASTER PLAN PURPOSE
The Park Master Plan is intended to provide a guide to maintaining and enhancing
existing parks and facilities while laying down the blue print for the development of
future parks within the city. The plan acknowledges that there are unique circumstances
within the city which create limitations or provide opportunities. The plan provides a
clear direction for the development of the Victoria park system for the next fifteen years.
As designs are developed from the master plan for the various parks and facilities, it is
essential to consider the following:
ƒ
Establish a visual project identity in harmony with the physical context that
reflects and respects the City of Victoria’s rural characteristics, historical past,
and future with design solutions that are innovative, efficient, durable, beautiful
and economically viable.
ƒ
Maintain a level of service that is consistent with that which is provided today by
the existing parks and facilities.
ƒ
Determine the needs and uses of each park and facility in accordance with
community’s standards.
ƒ
Provide a framework to guide planning, development and park administration
decisions
ƒ
Set the vision for the Victoria park system as well as the cornerstone “Big Idea”
features.
9
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
III. UNDERSTANDING VICTORIA
A.
Background
Victoria is a community that has a rich heritage as a place that encompassed unparalleled
natural resources and open spaces. This can be seen by looking out at any point within
the community at the numerous wetlands, big woods and nine lakes spread throughout
the city. In doing this, one quickly recognizes the symbiotic relationship between the
residents and their natural resources and open spaces and realizes that the enhancement,
preservation and addition to all of these amenities results in a higher quality of life for all.
Through past planning efforts Victoria has been able to maintain and preserve many of
the components that make the community what it is today (See Appendix A). In this
light it is clear that in order to understand the park and open space needs of the Victoria,
one must understand the history of the city’s planning efforts and the natural evolution of
the place.
Victoria was once covered by continental glaciers the last of which is referred to as the
Wisconsin. The numerous depressions left behind make up the extensive lakes and creek
system that is found today. Historically there were large areas covered by hardwood
forests that contain oak, elm, maple, basswood and ash trees. The topography consists of
nearly level plains, moraines and depressions. Most of Victoria and the eventual
annexation area drains towards Lake Minnetonka. Victoria is a part of the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District. Victoria and the surrounding area was settled in the 1800’s
and incorporated in the 1915.
Victoria is primarily a low density community with little commercial or industrial
development. As Victoria continues to grow there will be a need for services and
additional commercial development within the community. New higher density
development will begin to be developed as the number of people that move to this area
continues to increase.
B.
Related Planning Efforts
The City of Victoria has a current Comprehensive Plan which was adopted in 1998 and
amended in 2004. This document is the third generation of comprehensive plan
documents established by the City and is the primary resource used for planning and
guiding the development and redevelopment of the City of Victoria. The 2004
Comprehensive Plan Amendment set the development timelines and staging through the
year 2020. In addition to establishing land use designations and the staging of new
development, the Comprehensive plan sets forth the primary goals of the city as it
continues to develop. These goals have been in some part incorporated into this Park
Master Plan.
10
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
The goals established by the Comprehensive Plan are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Identity – Preserve small town rural qualities while allowing
development.
Environment – Protect lakes, wetlands, woods, parks and wildlife,
and use these amenities to attract development.
Downtown – Redevelop for prime retail, service, office, medical
and entertainment.
Industrial Park – Facilitate redevelopment by establishing an
Industrial Park and attract favorable (tax) development.
Transportation – Promote functional and aesthetic improvements
including landscaping, pedestrian and bike facilities.
Recreation – Take advantage of the parks and natural qualities and
provide recreation serving the varying needs of the Community.
Services – Establish/maintain a balance between extending services
and ability to pay.
Fiscal – Maintain or improve fiscal condition; have a stable tax
level relying on new growth to fund public costs.
Community Cohesion – Achieve cohesiveness by linking the
Community and improving communications.
Quality Development – Require development to be of high quality
(design and material) and achieved on a planned basis.
Annexation – Shall be orderly, fiscally sound and property annexed
to be fairly treated relative to taxes and services.
The city has recently completed several other planning studies which have set forth the
basis for the Park Master Plan. The South Sub-Area Study completed in 2002 and the
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) completed in 2003 focused on various
components included within this document.
C.
Demographic Trends
The City of Victoria has several demographic trends that are or will affect the park
system. In order to assess and anticipate the City’s current and future recreational needs,
one must understand its current and future population. The composition and population,
the number and type of housing, the extent of housing turnover and the number of school
aged children per house are all factors that need to be understood.
Population and Household Growth
Victoria’s population has more than quadrupled since 1990, increasing from nearly 1,200
to an estimated 5,800 in 2005. The city’s population has nearly exceeded that which was
projected (6,372) by the Metropolitan Council in 1998 (previous 2020 blue print
projection). The city projects that the population will more than triple in the next fifteen
11
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
(15) years so that by 2020 the City of Victoria will have a population of approximately
20,000 (See Figure 1).
Population / Household Growth
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Total Households
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2,169 2,375 2,581 2,787 2,993 3,200 3,565 4,015 4,465 4,915 5,365 5,815 6,215 6,615 7,015 7,415
Cummulative Population 6,073 6,650 7,226 7,803 8,380 8,960 9,982 11,242 12,502 13,762 15,022 16,282 17,402 18,522 19,642 20,762
Housing
The city’s housing stock consists primarily of single family residential units. As of
January 1, 2005 the city has approximately 2,200 housing units. Approximately 15% of
the current housing is multi-family. It is anticipated that housing will continue in a
similar fashion and with a similar ratio of single-family to multi-family. The projected
number of households in 2020 is 7500 units.
Housing needs for the over 55 population (often referred to as empty nesters) is changing.
There has been an increase in the development of condominium and multi-family
construction to accommodate the need to down-size. The higher cost of raw land has also
lead to the development of higher density multi-family developments. These
developments are attracting first and second time home buyers.
Household Composition
In general, the population of the region is aging. This is not unique to this region as the
country as a whole is seeing the largest percentage of the population over 55. At a local
level, there continues to be a steady flow of younger families to this area due to the new
development and growth occurring within Victoria. With the construction of the new
Highway 212 and the availability of developable land this trend is projected to continue
12
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
for the foreseeable future. One often overlooked national trend which has recently been
seen in Minnesota is the increase in immigration from outside the U.S. The twin cities
region has documented a steady increase in the number of immigrants to this area over
the last decade. These families have different demographic characteristics including
younger mean age and more children per household.
School-Age Children
The number of children per household has seen a decrease in this area despite the growth
due to new home starts. In the past, a multiplier of 0.7 children per single-family
household was used to determine the size. A recent study conducted by the Chaska Area
School District found that number to be more in the range of 0.55 children per singlefamily household. Similarly, the number of children per multi-family household has seen
a change from 0.2 to 0.11. According to the state demographer, Carver County is not
expected to see an increase in the number of school age children due to new births. The
largest factor that could contribute to the growth of children in this area will continue to
be immigration.
Victoria will likely continue to develop in a manner similar to its past with approximately
85% of the new construction to be single-family residential and 15% to be multi-family
residential. This will lead to a steady percentage of school age children per household
despite the high rate of growth.
Housing Turnover
There is no formula for projecting housing turnover in a particular area. Victoria has a
relatively new housing stock. The average home cost in Victoria is near the highest
average in the state. Typically, homes with higher values turnover more often than those
with lower home values. In Victoria, home values have increased significantly over the
past decade and may contribute to the number of turnovers that occur in the community.
It is anticipated that housing turnover will increase as the over 55 group continues to
replace their large single-family home with new multi-family homes in an effort to down
size. This may result in an increase of younger families with school age children.
Summary
The following trends and projections are based on the demographic data discussed above:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
The city’s population will significantly grow over the next 15
years.
The number of households will increase with the population
growth, while the average number of persons per household will
stay constant or slightly decline.
The number of school aged children in the community will grow;
however, the number per household will remain constant.
13
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
ƒ
D.
December 22, 2005
Increased immigration may balance the general aging of the
population.
Acquisition of Park Land
The city primarily uses two mechanisms to acquire park land:
1. Park Land Dedication Ordinance for New Developments
2. General Tax Dollars
Dedication of park land is required by the City of Victoria Subdivision Ordinance,
Section 22-32, for any new development or subdivision occurring within the city. Based
on the need established by the city for new park land, a three-part formula was
developed. The formula sets forth the amount of land required within each new
development. Generally, the three parts of the formula relate to the various types of park
land needed by the city to accommodate new growth and development.
Land dedication is required for community parks, neighborhood parks and for
recreational facilities needed to equip each park. The city has the option of requiring land
within the subdivision to be dedicated or can require the development to pay a fee in lieu
of park land. In some instances the city may determine that there is not suitable land for
a park or a park may be planned near to the proposed development. In this case, a fee
would be collected by the city to purchase park land in accordance with the locations and
standards prescribed in this plan. The city regularly updates the per acre value for land in
the area. The formula used by the city to determine the amount of land required to be
dedicated is continually updated based on the needs of the city. The city establishes the
nexus between the parks and facilities needs of the community and the amount of land
required. This number is used to calculate fees paid to the city in lieu of land. In
addition, the city must update the per acre value required to acquire new park land.
The development of the proposed parks in this plan will primarily be funded using the
park dedication requirements. Community, Neighborhood and Mini Parks should be
fully funded using park dedication requirements. The Big Ideas presented in this plan,
such as a Large Urban Park, will likely require additional funding sources. The city also
uses general tax dollars to purchase or acquire land in the existing portions of the city if
necessary.
E.
2004 Community Park and Recreation Survey Summary
This section provides a summary of the 2004 Park and Recreation Survey and offers Park
and Recreation Committee assessments that link survey responses to critical features of
the Park Master Plan.
14
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
The survey instrument was designed by the Parks and Recreation committee and
authorized by the City Council in March of 2004. The goals of the survey were to:
1. Understand the citizens’ priorities and satisfaction related to city parks and
recreation facilities and activities.
2. Create a “voice of the community” for the purpose of the Park Master Plan
process.
The survey was sent to 1900 homes, with 426 (22%) responses. Not all questions were
answered by all participants. The following summary presents only the major themes
identified by the responses. For a complete review of the survey please see the
Appendix.
Relevant Highlights for the 2005 Park Master Plan (See Appendix B)
1. Current Satisfaction - Level of Service
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
When asked how well the city was performing, the majority of responses
fell in “good” or across “good” and “fair” performance.
Topics included – places for activities and sports, safety, and natural areas
As a percentage the “don’t know” choice accounted for a higher than
expected proportion
Active recreation availability scored well
Master Plan Assessment: the current level of service is perceived to be good - not
exceptional, not weak.
2. Parks
ƒ
Neighborhood Parks*
ƒ
Want park/playground in the local neighborhood
ƒ
Want age-appropriate play equipment, especially for older children
(pre-teen)
ƒ
Concerns about crossing roads
ƒ
Perceived inequities
*In the survey context, “Neighborhood Park” was not defined as currently presented in the Master Plan
Master Plan Assessment: While existing parks score well, comments regarding
placement, access, and facilities indicate an opportunity for improvement in service
area and facility standards
3. Trails
ƒ
The most important facility to households is walking and biking trails
ƒ
Like the existing trail system, better connections are desired
ƒ
Lack of trails in some neighborhoods
15
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
ƒ
December 22, 2005
Comments included specific requests for various locations
Master Plan Assessment: The Master Plan must make trails a priority – high level of
participation, high priority for investment, requests for improvements.
4. Alternative Sources of Recreation
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Parks do not contain the facilities people need
Members of households use facilities in other communities
Fees are too expensive
Master Plan Assessment: The Master Plan recommendations must consider
competitive alternatives available in adjacent cities.
5. Funding Priorities
Citizens were asked to rank the priority of spending across the following options if
additional funds were available.
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Improvements/maintenance of existing trails
Acquisition/development of walking and biking trails
Development of special facilities (dog parks, water playgrounds,
campgrounds, skate parks, etc)
Construction of environmental facilities
Acquisition of open space areas and areas for preservation
Additional neighborhood parks
Development of and indoor nature/environmental center
Swimming pool (outdoor)
Swimming pool (indoor)
Master Plan Assessment: trails are an important based on use and funding priority. The
pool generated many comments, but is a lower funding priority
16
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
IV. PARK SYSTEM ORGANIZATION
A.
Organizational Format
Parks have been classified or reclassified into six new categories using park types
previously established by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) and
additional definitions established through this plan. The six types are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Large Urban Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Mini Park
Sports Complex
Open Space
The Park and Recreation Committee, city staff and consultant (referred to as the
“planning team” or “team”) assessed the existing parks to determine their type based on
the criteria established by the NRPA and by the planning team. The existing park system
was somewhat difficult to categorize due to the size of certain parks. Within the existing
system some parks may function as a certain type of park even though their overall size is
less than that typically recommended by the national standard. It was recognized by the
planning team that existing parks had limited expansion possibility and therefore, when
categorizing, emphasis was placed on their function as well as size. Definitions for new
park facilities are generally based on the national standard for both size and function.
Park definitions or names used prior to this plan document should not be considered to
match the new definitions.
B.
Level of Service Summary
The planning team assessed the service area coverage using industry standards such as
those developed by the National Recreation and Parks Association. It was determined
through this process that Victoria needed to add two additional classifications to the park
system in order to accommodate parks that will be needed in the future. Both Large
Urban Park and Sports Complex were not previously identified as possible existing or
future parks. It was also identified that an expanded definition of certain park types
needed to be established that was pertinent to the growth and development specific to
Victoria.
In order to establish the level of service standards for each of the facilities and park types
identified, the team first compiled an inventory of the existing parks and their facilities
(See Figure 2 and 3). With this inventory, the team established a per population ratio of
park types and facilities. The team then used this information to evaluate the existing
level of service provided and the adequacy of each.
17
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
In general, Victoria meets or exceeds the level of service requirements established by the
NRPA with only a few exceptions. In many areas, the city exceeds the criteria developed
by the NPRA. In most cases where the city exceeded levels of service provided, the
excess can be justified based on the current demand for those parks and facilities. The
existing Victoria standards were evaluated in conjunction with the national standards to
establish the new standards that Victoria will use moving forward.
Victoria’s parks were classified as follows based on “Park, Recreation, Open Space and
Greenway Guidelines” developed in 1996 by the National Recreation and Park
Association (NRPA) (See Figure 2):
Large Urban Park – Serves a broader purpose than community parks and is used when
community and neighborhood parks are not adequate to serve the needs of the
community. Focus is on meeting community-based recreational needs, as well as
preserving unique landscapes and open spaces. A minimum of 75 acres with 100 acres or
more being optimal.
Key Attributes
ƒ Service Area: Citywide
ƒ Size: 75-100 acres
ƒ Standard: 100 acres per 15,000, 70% passive recreation and 30 %
active recreation area.
Community Park – Serves a broader purpose than a neighborhood park, although
community parks may contain certain park components benefiting adjacent
neighborhoods. Focus is on meeting community-based recreational needs, as well as
preserving unique landscapes and open spaces.
Key Attributes
ƒ Service Area: Citywide – geographically distributed. 1 to 3 mile
service area depending on geographic boundaries or limitation in
access such as State Highways (Highways 7 and 5)
ƒ Size: 30 – 50 acres
ƒ Standard: 13 acres/1,000 population, with 60% passive recreation
and 40 % active recreation area.
ƒ Must have three (3) points of public access. Two (2) must allow
vehicular access directly from a public right of way.
Neighborhood Park – The basic unit of the park system and serves as the recreational
and social focus of the neighborhood. Intended to serve residents primarily within safe
walking distance. Neighborhood parks cannot serve areas that access the park via a road
crossing over the following roads: CSAH 11, 13, 18, 43 and State Highways 5 and 7
unless a grade separated crossing is provided. Must include a regulation size
soccer/football/lacrosse field or a baseball/softball field and any combination of three (3)
of the following activities:
18
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
December 22, 2005
children’s play equipment
basketball and/or tennis courts
outdoor hockey rink with boards or recreational rink with site for
warming house
off-street parking
trails into and around the park from adjoining residential
neighborhoods
picnic shelter/bathrooms
waterfront access.
neighborhood parks may be developed in conjunction with
elementary schools.
Key Attributes
ƒ Service Area: ½ - 1 mile service distance and uninterrupted by
non-residential roads
ƒ Size: 5-15 acres
ƒ Standard: 8 acres/1,000 population
ƒ Must have two (2) points of public access. One (1) must allow
vehicular access directly from a public right of way.
Mini-Park – Used to address limited, isolated or unique recreational needs. Mini parks
will be developed only in areas where a neighborhood park cannot be developed now or
in the future due to land acquisition restrictions. Typically provides a limited function
with features that may include basketball, tennis court, or children’s play equipment.
Mini-parks do not meet the definition of a neighborhood park, but typically provides a
limited function with features that may include basketball, tennis court, or children’s play
equipment.
Key Attributes
ƒ Service Area: ¼ mile
ƒ Size:
5,000 sq. ft to 2 acres
ƒ Standard:
0.5 acres/1,000 population
ƒ Must have one (1) points of public access directly from a public
right of way. Multiple points of access are encouraged.
*Above and beyond the contribution to their designated neighborhood or community park, a
developer may also develop a mini-park. Such discretional parks shall adhere to the guidelines
presented in City Ordinances and the Park Master Plan.
Sports Complex – A sports complex is a multi-purpose active recreation facility
designed to meet the specific needs of organized and recreational athletics. The location
of a sports complex must accommodate the practical requirements of such a facility
including suitable access roads, parking, restrooms, and field lighting. Commercial
developments offer a suitable location. Sports Complexes shall include the services
19
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
previously listed, plus concessions stands, athletic equipment storage, management
office, maintenance equipment storage, and at least three (3) of the following elements:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
2-4 Lit Softball Fields
2-4 Lit Baseball Fields
2-6 Lit Soccer Fields
2-4 Lit Hockey Rinks
1 Recreational Rink
1 High-level Community Baseball Field (with grandstand and
suitable parking)
Pavilion w/restrooms, concessions
Sports complexes may be built and/or operated with private or public partners.
Key Attributes
Service Area: Citywide
50 to 75 acres
Standard: One per 15,000 population
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Open Space – Lands set aside for preservation of significant natural resources, remnant
landscapes and open space. Open space shall be comprised of significant natural
resources such as a hardwood stand of trees, wetlands, key drainage ways, steep slopes
with significant vegetation and lakes and ponds.
Key Attributes
ƒ Service Area: City –wide
ƒ Size: Any
ƒ Standard: 50 acres/1,000 population
Trail Systems – Systems developed to accommodate walking, hiking, jogging, and
bicycling. New trails must connect to existing trails and connect open space and
recreation or civic facilities to exiting or new residential, commercial and retail areas in
the city and beyond. Trails may be developed as multi-purpose trails which can
accommodate multiple activities.
Key Attributes
ƒ Standard: Walking/hiking/jogging: 1.1 miles/1,000 population
Bicycling: .7 miles/1,000 population
C.
Current Park Inventory - General Observations and Reactions
Observations made during the development of this plan indicate both current problems
and potential opportunities for parks and recreational facilities. In general:
20
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
The following summarizes the team’s conclusions:
ƒ
Victoria has a significant park system advantage due to the location of the Carver
Park Preserve which is owned and maintained by Three Rivers Park District.
ƒ
Victoria is generally well served by the community parks (Lion’s, Deithelm, and
Laketown Parks). As the community continues to grow the location of new
community park facilities will be necessary. Generally, the number of parks and
types of facilities will be consistent with those already developed so that the level
of service that is seen today will not adversely change with the additional growth
set to occur in the community. The city will increase the level of service provided
by incorporating several new types of facilities (i.e. Sports Complex and Large
Urban Park).
ƒ
Victoria lacks an adequate number of neighborhood parks that are located in the
community. Because of this, many Victoria residents have to drive and or cross
major roadways to enjoy many of the recreational opportunities provided for in
the community. Neighborhood parks should make up the majority of the park
facilities in the community and provide the primary recreation opportunity for
residents.
ƒ
When compared with national standards and Victoria standards, many of the
existing neighborhood parks lack in facilities and do not have adequate active
recreation opportunities. Some of this can be remedied by the development of
park land currently owned by the city; however, in some areas there is no longer
an opportunity to obtain additional land. Opportunities could include a regulation
athletic field that would allow for the programming of recreational opportunities
and the neighborhood levels. Currently, residents have to travel to Community
Parks to use these facilities.
ƒ
Victoria has 14 mini-parks that serve the community. These parks provide
limited recreation opportunities and should not be constructed in areas where a
neighborhood park should be the primary park. The city has several areas that
will continue to be serviced by mini-parks due to restrictions in the acquisition of
land.
ƒ
Victoria has a need for an additional large urban park that will service future and
present residents of the city. This park will likely be within the future annexation
area and located between CSAH 10 and Marsh Lake Road and between CSAH 43
and CSAH 11. This park will serve as the “star park” in the system and will be
one of high amenity and recreational opportunity.
21
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
V.
EXISTING PARK SYSTEM
A.
Analysis of Conditions
December 22, 2005
Victoria has approximately 250 acres of existing parkland spread throughout 27 parks
within the current city limits. Victoria has three (3) Community Parks, six (6)
Neighborhood Parks, nine (9) Mini-Parks and approximately five (5) specifically
designated open space areas within the community. Carver Park Preserve, while
significant, is not owned or operated by the city and therefore not included in the acreage
or park totals (approximately 500 acres currently within Victoria).
Conditions of the existing facilities were analyzed by the planning team during the
development of this plan. Each park was evaluated to determine its current condition and
to realize opportunities for development of additional facilities or redevelopment of
existing facilities. Development recommendations are based on physical opportunities
and constraints, the new level of service standards, the desire to balance facilities across
the park system, and input to date from neighborhood groups. Following the evaluation
of each park many ideas and or opportunities were discussed by the planning team. The
analysis of the existing facilities helped the team establish the level of service and park
standards incorporated into this plan.
Recommendations made for each of the existing parks are only conceptual and do not
represent a formal recommendation by the planning team. The recommendations will
need to be further evaluated by the Park and Recreation Committee and City Council to
determine what improvements can and should be made. The following inventory and
recommendations are organized by park type.
Community Parks
Diethelm Park
Location: Diethelm Park is located at the corner of Kochia Lane and 86th St. W.
Existing: This park contains the field house and the Acorn House, and unlit
fields, consisting of one baseball field, two softball fields, and three soccer fields.
It has a miniature basketball court and a skate park in the same area. There are
toddler and youth play structures with several (6) benches in the same area. There
are trails and sidewalks leading to the play structures and connecting much of the
property. There is a permanent bathroom in the field house which is available
when the field house is open. Portable latrines are primarily used. While there is
quite a lot of parking, it appears that it could be insufficient for some events or
multiple events. All items appear to be in good condition. The fields look to be
particularly well kept.
22
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Recommendations: The park presents opportunities to add drinking fountains
and toilet facilities that are more proximate to the fields. A sheltered picnic area
would also be a nice feature. There is no meaningful shelter available in case of
inclement weather or strong sunshine with the possible exception of the field
house and baseball dugouts. The park is also suitable for an outdoor skating and
hockey rink, including outdoor rental ice for added revenue. The kids would like
new and better ramps in the skate park. The existing ball fields are planned to be
lighted in the future.
Lions Park:
Location: Lions Park is located a few block south of downtown Victoria on the
corner of County Roads 11 and 18.
Existing: This community park is widely considered to be the centerpiece of the
Victoria parks system, and the community itself. Developed in cooperation
between the Victoria Lions and the City, the park provides mostly active
recreation opportunities with several fields, an outside hockey rink, two (2) tennis
courts, a play structure and two shelters. The park is served by trails, but has no
trails on the property. The park has two gravel parking lots. Several facilities
show significant signs of aging.
Recommendations: This park is suitable for a rehabilitation plan as well as a
plan to add features such as paved parking, paved trails leading through the park,
irrigation, trash receptacles, and other amenities to support its heavy use. A
rehabilitation plan should address repair due to vandalism, normal use, neglect,
and age. The existing tennis courts will need to be resurfaced in order to remain
useable. These courts have been included in the existing count and allow the city
to meet the established standards. There is limited undeveloped space, but the
park could accommodate horseshoes, Frisbee golf or other low foot-print facilities
within the community park service list. A volleyball court could be placed in the
location of the previous playground equipment on 82nd Street.
Laketown Park/Victoria Elementary:
Location: Laketown Park is part of the new elementary school development off
of Laketown Road and County Road 11.
Existing: The school and park are new (2005) and has 1 unlit baseball field, 1
unlit softball field, 2 soccer/football fields, basketball courts (2 half court and 1
full court), youth play structure, trail, ample parking, drinking fountain, and trash
receptacles.
Recommendations: Place sign off of County Road 11 to identify location of the
park/school, paint the basketball courts, add benches or picnic tables, and connect
the trail to the other neighborhoods around as the park develops.
23
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Neighborhood Parks
Noterman Park: (Allegheny Grove 4th Addition)
Location: Kochia Lane is on the eastern border, Linden Lane is on the south with
Savanna Way/Trail on the north
Existing: Noterman is an undeveloped park consisting primarily of mature woods
and grassy openings. The park does not have a trail that is in good condition.
Recommendations: The trail could be incorporated into the rest of the trail
system. Picnic tables could be added to the open areas. The trail could have
several workout stations (chin-up bars, sit-up area, etc.) installed along its length
and include interpretive signage.
Goodman Park:
Location: Off of Park Drive, between Parkview Lane and 74th St. W, near
Carver Park Reserve.
Existing: Unimproved land with a low area near road and a north flowing creek
on the east side. Approximately 50/50 woods and meadow.
Recommendations: An open soccer style field could be built near the road in the
low area filled in with soil, a nature trail can be installed with an overlook are by
the creek, a rest area or way station could be added at the borders of the LRT trail
system, or a youth play structure, and possible parking. Neighbors of Goodman
park have expressed a variety of views surrounding development of this park.
South Virginia Shores:
Location: Located off of Smithtown Road and Virginia Shores Circle, this is the
only park north of Highway 7.
Existing: This park encompasses a fairly large tract of land, most of which is
currently in a natural wooded state. The facilities at this park consist of one tennis
court and a ½ basketball court. There is also a small play structure at this
location. There are no trails leading directly to the park or along Smithtown
Road. There is limited unpaved parking at this location.
Recommendations: A trail should be developed to connect this park to the
surrounding neighborhoods and to the LRT to increase access, as well as, paving
the parking area. All of the current facilities at this park require upgrading or
replacement including the existing tennis and basketball courts. The tennis court
should remain, and the remainder of the site should be developed in a manner
24
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
consistent with the needs of the community and in accordance with the Park
Master Plan.
Watermark Park:
Location: Located in the Watermark development off Church Lake Blvd. The
park is behind residential housing and borders the west side of Kelzer Pond.
Existing: The neighborhood park is long and narrow with a trail running through
its length. It contains a toddler play structure and has several street side parking
spots. The open area has a trail system.
Recommendations: This park is relatively new and the equipment is in good
condition. Because of its long narrow layout, it is amenable to new installations.
The open areas could have a more developed trail system. A nature or wetlands
interpretation station could be added, including a fishing dock.
Mini-Parks
Church Lake Park:
Location: Church Lake Park is considered open space and is located on the
Western edge of Victoria Circle, along the Eastern edge of Church Lake.
Existing: The narrow park is completely unimproved with the exception of a City
pump house and a park sign. The park runs parallel to a neighborhood road and
has poorly defined road for the pump house that can serve as a parking area. The
lake side is bordered by a stand of cat tails and a small pond. The park has been
used as a dumping location for yard clippings. Despite its beautiful physical
surroundings, the park appears to be largely neglected.
Recommendations: The physical appearance of the park would be improved by
enhancing the landscaping and by shielding or placing an updated façade on the
pump house.
Deer Run Park I
Location: This property is located in the Deer Run Development at the
intersection of Ridge Pond Court and Ridge Pond Drive.
Existing: The park is rather well equipped for its size. However, it is in need of
maintenance. It contains a tennis court, a ½ basketball court that is also equipped
for volleyball. It has a sizeable play structure, one picnic table, and one bench.
There are perhaps six off street parking spaces as well as on street parking.
25
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Recommendations: There is limited development potential at this site due to its
size. The courts are in great need of resurfacing. They are cracked and worn.
One could convert the basketball court to a skate park very easily. A picnic area
could also easily be added.
Deer Run Park II
Location: This Property is located in the Deer Run Development near the
intersection of Edgewater Place and Wedgemere Point.
Existing: The Property has very a limited amount of space. It contains a small
play structure, a bench, and a picnic table. All are in reasonable condition. Street
parking is available.
Recommendations: There is very little new that can be achieved with this
property. It is limited in size with a large portion being hilly or low lying, but
would be a possible option for a sliding hill.
Holy Family Tennis Courts:
Location: Located on the grounds of Holy Family High School at the intersection
off of Kochia Lane.
Existing: The park contains eight (8) unlit tennis courts that are relatively new
and in good condition. A large parking lot is adjacent to the tennis courts. There
are several chairs between the courts and a portable bathroom on site.
Recommendations: This park should be maintained in its current state, in
partnership with Holy Family Catholic High School. There is potential for a
permanent bathroom and drinking fountain.
Katy Hills Park:
Location: Katy Hills is located on 81st Street to the East of Victoria Drive,
County Road 11.
Existing: Built on roughly one acre of land, Katy Hills Park is surrounded on
three sides by residential streets and houses on one side. The park is well
landscaped and has a small trail that transverses the property. The central feature
is a two component play structure that appears to date to the 1980s. The park is in
generally good condition.
Recommendations: Katy Hills presents few opportunities for improvement other
than benches, tables, and eventual play equipment upgrades.
26
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Kelzer Pond Park:
Location: Off of Kelzer Pond Drive near Thrushwood Circle. Located behind
the homes on the east side of Kelzer Pond.
Existing: The park sits on a hill on the northwest side of Kelzer Pond with
approximately 200 feet of pond shoreline. A trail runs through the park and it has
a youth play structure. A trash container is on site. The south side of the hill has
a wonderful view of the pond and is currently overgrown with grass.
Recommendations: The south side of the hill could be leveled out and a picnic
area could be installed with tables and possibly a small covered pavilion. The
pond shoreline could be the site of a fishing dock as several spots work well.
Kirkelachen Park:
Location: Kirkelachen Park is located at the primary entry to the Kirkelachen
neighborhood on 81st Avenue, bound to the north by the LRT trail.
Existing: This mini park contains a tennis court and a small area with recently
planted trees. The Northern edge of the park is bound by a run-off pond. The
park also serves as the western trail head of the LRT trail; however there are no
signs or facilities to accommodate that function. There are approximately three
parking spots parallel to the street.
Recommendations: The Kirkelachen residents have express interest in
improving their park. A Learning Service project was conducted in early 2005
for the park, which, in combination with resident input, should serve as the basis
for park improvement ideas. This park is suitable for a rehabilitation plan as well
as a plan to add features such as benches, picnic tables, a gazebo, a scenic
overlook, and other amenities to support uses of the trail. The existing tennis
court is not functional. Facilities to support trail users should be balanced with
development of the trail head in downtown Victoria and the interests of the
neighborhood residents. There are opportunities for passive recreation in
conjunction with Salter’s Park.
Overlook at Tamarack Lake:
Location: Located on the West shore of Tamarack Lake, directly south of the
LRT line.
Existing: The park is currently undeveloped wooded space with a bench and
views of Lake Tamarack. The park is accessed by a paved trail from the
Overlook at Tamarack Lake Subdivisions and the LRT. There is no equipment or
maintained facilities in this park
27
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Recommendations: There is a potential for this lake to accommodate a
swimming beach, however, this may not be conducive to the overall vision for the
park preserve. This park may serve the city better as a passive recreation area to
be included in the overall development of the Lake Tamarack Park Preserve.
Salter’s Park:
Location: Located just south of Highway 5 in downtown Victoria.
Existing: There are currently no facilities located at this park. The majority of
the land is wooded although there is a large open space at the top of the park.
There are good views to Carver Park Preserve due to the change in elevation.
Recommendations: There is a potential to develop a trail-head to the regional
trail due to the close proximity that this park has to downtown and acts as the
“trail gateway” to the west.
Swiss Mountain:
Location: Located in the Swiss Mountain Subdivision at the intersection of
Interlaken and Saint Moritz.
Existing: The park is surrounded by existing single-family homes and contains a
play structure, separate swing set and one picnic table. A paved trail connects this
park to the LRT.
Recommendations: This park should be maintained in its current condition as a
Mini-Park.
Swiss Mountain Open Spaces
Location: These properties are somewhat disjointed. They surround the northern
portion of Tamarack Lake and are adjacent to the Swiss Mountain Development.
The LRT trail runs through most of the properties.
Existing: The properties are now lying in a natural state with no meaningful
access by car. However, the LRT trail runs through the area and makes it
accessible by bicycle or on foot.
Recommendations: These properties could easily be developed into a nature
preserve with walking trails, including a trail around the lake that ties into the
Lake Tamarack Preserve. (along the lines of Woodlake preserve in Richfield).
The lake water quality appears to be quite good and would be fine for swimming.
However, creating a beach would be problematic due to the marshy character of
the property. Perhaps a development in conjunction with The Arboretum would
be possible.
28
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Wintergreen Park
Location: Wintergreen Park is located in the Wintergreen Development at the
corner of Rhoy Street and Wintergreen Lane.
Existing: The park consists of a sizeable play structure on one end of the park
and open mowed grass on the remainder. There are trails to the play structure and
continuing on through the park. Street parking is available. There are two
benches and one picnic table near the play structure. All are in good repair. The
trash receptacles are in poor condition.
Recommendations: The property could easily contain another amenity on the
grass portion. However, little more than a tennis court would fit. There appear to
be a large number of kids living in the area. A skate park would fit easily and
would probably be well used. Size would limit other options for development.
Woodlands Park
Location: Woodlands park is in the Woodlands Addition between Oak Drive and
Tilia Lane.
Existing: The park currently contains a toddler play structure with four adjacent
benches and a cobblestone path to the play area. It has a gravel trail running the
length of the park. The trail is surrounded by land in its natural state. It connects
as a continuation of the Victoria trail system. There is only street parking
available. The structures are in good repair.
Recommendations: Size is a limiting factor. Trail should be upgraded to a
bituminous trail. Any further addition of amenities would be at the expense of the
natural setting. The neighbors should be consulted first.
Zumbra Ridge:
Location: Located off of Zumbra Drive, South of Highway 7.
Existing: This private park consists of a relatively large mowed area containing a
softball backstop and field in addition to two play structures. There is also one
picnic table and one bench at this site.
Recommendations: This park should be maintained and upgraded in a manner
consistent with the needs of the neighborhood and in accordance with the Park
Master Plan.
29
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
B.
December 22, 2005
Existing Facilities
Victoria has inventoried its existing facilities and fields and evaluated the adequacy
against the national standards derived by the NPRA. The NPRA has established a
benchmark with standards for the city to compare itself against. The standards set forth
the ratio of facilities (such as the number of soccer fields per 1,000 residents) to
population that, if followed, provide appropriate levels for the residents. Victoria
generally exceeds the standards in all areas with several exceptions.
Many communities adopt the national standards as their own for simplicity. The national
standards, the community survey, and the existing facilities inventory were all tools used
to establish Victoria’s own standard. (See Figure 3) The standards established by this
document took into account many different variables and criteria. It is believed that the
standards developed through this plan will better and more fully accommodate the needs
of this community for the future generations of parks and recreation users.
Victoria falls short of meeting the national standards in two areas; hockey and
recreational skating rinks and lighted fields. These deficiencies were considered when
establishing the new standards. The popularity of hockey and skating in this area further
highlight the need for additional facilities. Lighted fields in the city are just short of
meeting the national standards. The city has recently reviewed this issue and found that
the demand for lighted fields did not justify the cost given various constraints. It is
anticipated that this issue will reviewed again in the near future by the city. These
facilities will become priorities for future development within both the existing and future
system.
C.
Existing Trails
The Community Survey completed in 2004 identified one primary theme that stood out
from all others; the importance of trails and trail connectivity. Residents of Victoria
stated that the trails were the most used and most needed recreational facility provided by
the city. Trails provide a major opportunity for recreation within the community as well
as providing an important transportation link between houses and facilities.
The trail system in Victoria is relatively new with the exception of the Regional LRT line
that runs through Victoria from the northeast. Victoria began requiring new trails in
conjunction with new development during the early 1990s following the adoption of the
park dedication requirements in the Subdivision Ordinance. The initial trails often
consisted of gravel and or narrow sidewalks. Victoria now requires that new
development provide new trails in accordance with the adopted trail plan (See Plan). All
trails are required to meet the cities adopted construction specifications. In general, all
trails are required to be bituminous with a width of eight and one-half feet. Many of the
new developments are now linked by bituminous trails.
30
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Trails are typically broken into two categories; on-street trails and off-street trails. Onstreet trails provide a safe (visible), open and direct opportunity for both connectivity and
recreation. These are the primary trails in the trail system and typically the most widely
used. Off-street trails typically take advantage of a natural amenity and provide users
with a more sensory experience. While these trails may connect different facilities and
places, they are typically focused on the actual trip and not necessarily the destination.
Victoria has both types of trails within the park system. Both types of trails will remain
important during future development of this system.
Trails should generally accommodate or provide for the following:
ƒ
Provide safe pedestrian access to all parks.
ƒ
Connect all parks, natural amenities, civic buildings, schools.
ƒ
Connect Victoria to regional parks and facilities and adjoining community
external trails where possible.
In reviewing the existing trail system for completeness, it was determined that there are
several gaps in the system that need to be filled. The Existing Trail Map indicates the
existing trail system and the proposed infill pieces that will need to be constructed in
order to complete the system. The majority of the infill pieces are located adjacent to
property that has yet to develop. Upon the development of the property, the trails will
need to be constructed. The city does not control the timeframe for the development of
private property and therefore it is possible that the city may want to develop certain
portions of trail prior to the development of the property occurring. The planning team
has reviewed the portions of infill trail that need to be constructed and have prioritized
construction as delineated below.
ƒ
A trail link from Smithtown Road to the LRT trail at the grade separated crossing
beneath State Highway 7 should be constructed to provide a safe link to the
residents located north of the highway. This connection was reviewed in the field
and it appears to be feasible by obtaining a use permit for the right of way along
State Highway 7 and be utilizing the city owned park land. Approximate length
of trail to complete connection: 3,000 linear feet.
ƒ
A trail link between the existing trail at the intersection of CSAH 11 and CSAH
18 should be constructed to the west along CSAH 43 and connect into the trail at
the Watermark Development. There is currently a gap in the trail system that will
connect all development along CSAH 43 to the city trail system. This link will be
difficult to build due to the steep slopes and limited right of way. Acquisition of
an easement on private property may be necessary to complete this trail.
Approximate length of trail to complete connection: 1,800 linear feet.
ƒ
A trail link between the Woodland’s Development/Greenway on the Park and the
trails along Kochia Lane and 86th Street should be constructed through Diethelm
31
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Park. There is currently no way to access the interior of Diethelm Park from any
of the surrounding developments. Approximate length of trail to complete
connection: 2,000 linear feet.
ƒ
A trail link between Lion’s Park and the existing residential development to the
east of the park should be constructed through the park. This would provide
access into the interior of the park via a paved trail. Approximate length of trail
to complete connection: 750 linear feet.
ƒ
A trail link between Holy Family High School and State Highway 5 along the
projected path of Kochia Lane. There is an existing trail along the northwest side
of Kochia lane that ends along with the road. It is anticipated that this trail will
be extended to the north in conjunction with the construction of the new road.
Approximate length of trail to complete connection: 2,700 linear feet.
ƒ
A trail link between the Laketown development on CSAH 11 and the existing trail
at the intersection of 86th Street and CSAH 11. There is a portion of trail that is
currently missing along CSAH 11 that will connect the Laketown Development
(Victoria Elementary School) and the existing trail along CSAH 11. Approximate
length of trail to complete connection: 2,700 linear feet.
There are other trail connections shown on the trail map that will need to be constructed
and have not been prioritized as a part of this plan. The remaining pieces of trail infill are
as follows:
ƒ
Connection of the trails along the east side of Rolling Acres Road.
ƒ
Establish a trail along Smithtown Road.
ƒ
New trail from downtown Victoria to the entrance of Auburn Lake Campground
in Carver Park Preserve. This trail will likely be located along the east side of
CSAH 11.
ƒ
Establish a trail along the north side of State Highway 7 from Smithtown Road
west to Minnetrista. This trail could ultimately connect to the Lake Minnetonka
Regional Park.
ƒ
Establish a trail along the north side of State Highway 5 connecting the existing
trail at Park Drive east to the trail at Minnewashta Parkway.
ƒ
Establish a trail along the west side of Bavaria Road from the Applewood
subdivision, across State Highway 5, and then along the east side of Rolling
Acres Road to the existing trail in the Overlook at Tamarack Lake subdivision.
32
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
VI. FUTURE PARK SYSTEM
A.
Future Park Development
Analysis of the existing park system, trails and facilities has enabled the city to better
understand the needs of the community and its residents. A firm understanding and
assessment of the community needs led to the establishment of the level of service
standards for new park types and facilities as defined in a previous section. Using these
standards, the city has projected the needs of the community based on future growth and
in turn provides a plan to accommodate those needs through the year 2020. Victoria will
develop two (2) new community parks, twenty (20) new neighborhood parks, one (1)
sports complex and one (1) large urban park over the next 15 years.
In reviewing the existing park system, assessing the feedback provided by the residents in
the community survey, and comparing Victoria against the national standards, it became
evident that the focus of the future park system should be neighborhood parks.
Neighborhood parks should provide the primary opportunity for recreation in the system.
These parks should provide for this within a safe walking distance from every residence.
Victoria has generally set aside an adequate amount of land for neighborhood parks but
has not developed the parks to fully meet the needs of the community
Victoria’s future park system will be developed in accordance with the standards and
guidelines established in this document. The plan indicates the proposed types and
number of parks and facilities. This information is shown on the Future Park map.
Land Acquisition
Victoria will acquire new park land primarily through the dedication of land as required
by the city Subdivision Ordinance. This plan identifies the approximate location of
future parks by taking the level of service area for each park type and projecting it onto
the future growth area of the city. The parks are spaced according to the standards
established by the city. It was the intent of this plan to locate parks on property
boundaries. In most instances this will allow the city to require the dedication from
several property owners which when combined will provide the acreage needed to meet
the acreage standards. Actual locations of future parks will be determined by studying
field conditions at the time the land is developed.
Preservation of Existing Natural Resources / Open Space
The natural environment of Victoria was last inventoried and analyzed by the city in 1997
as a part of the Comprehensive Plan. It was found that the quality of the natural
environment was outstanding. The city’s waterways, lakes, woodlands, wetlands, hills
and parks all contribute to a highly favorable environment. The community through its
strategic comprehensive plan has made the preservation of these resources part of the
community-wide goals. Development of the city due to growth will cause some loss or
33
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
alteration of the natural environment. It is for this reason that the city will need to focus
on the protection and preservation of the most unique and desirable features.
Victoria has established policies and procedures in both the Subdivision and Zoning
Ordinance that will help to protect the existing lakes, woodlands, wetlands and hills. The
Zoning Ordinance includes Tree Preservation Requirements which provide for the
preservation of existing woodland stands. The Shoreland Zoning District has established
setback criteria from lakes and streams to ensure the preservation of these amenities. The
city encourages the private development of lake shore property for public open space
similar in concept to that developed by the City of Minneapolis around the chain of lakes.
The city requires that wetlands and their respective buffers are left as public open space.
Steep slopes are also protected through the Zoning Ordinance.
The city has worked to innovatively incorporate significant natural resources into the
design of new developments and parks. In doing this, Victoria has acquired a diverse
portfolio of open and natural spaces which makes up a significant part of the park system.
Moving forward, the park system will be used as a tool to protect and preserve significant
natural resources in the community.
Victoria will look to preserve additional open space using existing requirements set forth
in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and by developing new strategies. The city
will look at opportunities to obtain grants and public funding for the preservation of open
space and important environmental amenities. Private/public partnerships will also be
encouraged as opportunities arise for the additional preservation of open space.
B.
Future Facility Development
New facilities will be developed within each park type according to the menu prescribed
in the level of service standards. As previously stated the majority of future parks will be
dedicated to the city and developed at the time the land is subdivided. Development of
the future facilities should be done simultaneously to the development of the parks. This
will ensure adherence to the master plan and the standards established.
The city will need to manage the development of the new parks and facilities so that the
number and type of facilities continues to follow the standards established. In order to do
this, a current inventory will need to be maintained by the city. When a new park is
developed the city will provide input and direction into the types and kinds of facilities
required for each park.
When Victoria reaches the projected 2020 population, it would need to develop the
following types and number of facilities in order to meet the goals established by this
plan.
ƒ
7 - Baseball Fields (light 50%)
34
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
ƒ
17 - Basketball Goals
ƒ
4 - Hockey Rinks (light 25%)
ƒ
9 - Multi – Use (Soccer/Football) (light 25%)
ƒ
10 – Playgrounds
ƒ
4 - Recreational Skating Areas (light 25%)
ƒ
2 - Skate Parks
ƒ
14 - Softball Fields (light 50%)
ƒ
13 - Tennis Courts (light 50%)
ƒ
1 – Vita Course (programmed exercise course)
ƒ
5 – Volleyball Courts
December 22, 2005
* Facilities in bold currently do not meet the standards established by this Master Plan.
C.
Future Trail Development
Trails will continue to provide a major opportunity for recreation within the community
as well as providing an important transportation link between houses and facilities. Trails
in combination with the Green Ribbon system will work to seamlessly link parks and
natural amenities with residences, businesses and civic places throughout the community.
This trail system will provide for both passive and active recreation opportunities and
will make important connections to regional trails were possible.
Future Trails will be developed in accordance with the trail plan developed in this plan.
New trails will primarily be developed in conjunction with the subdivision and
development of land. Alignment of trails is conceptual to reflect connection goals not
exact locations. Exact locations will be determined by studying field conditions at the
time of development.
There are several trail corridors that when fully developed will form the backbone of the
future trail system.
ƒ
The extension of the LRT line from downtown Victoria to the western
edge of the future city will create a major corridor through Victoria linking
many important features and amenities.
35
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
ƒ
The development of the regional trail corridor connecting the LRT south
to the existing trail in Chaska in accordance with the plans established by
Carver County. This trail will ultimately link the Minnesota River Trail to
the LRT providing a major regional connection extending far beyond
Carver County.
ƒ
The development of a trail connecting Victoria’s existing downtown to the
proposed urban node planned near the intersection of CSAH 11 and
CSAH 10.
36
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
VII. REGIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
The master plan team has examined the regional systems that are within or adjacent to the
City of Victoria. Through this process there were several opportunities that were
identified. These include city-wide trail links, greenways to and connecting major lakes
and parks within the area, a partnership with Three Rivers Park District, a Partnership
with the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and the development of a regional trail
corridor that would connect Victoria to a the regional system being developed by Carver
County. The illustrations on the following pages illustrate the sum of potential regional
opportunities.
Neighboring Communities
Chanhassen
Victoria has an existing trail connection which currently links the cities at the intersection
of Minnewashta Pkwy. And State Highway 5. This link is important because it will
ultimately tie into the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum at this point. The City of
Chanhassen is planning to extend a trail along the north side of CSAH 5 to Minnewashta
Parkway. This will complete a link that will take you from downtown Chanhassen to the
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum.
Chaska
Victoria has worked with Chaska in the past to develop connections between the existing
trail systems in each city. In 2004 an important connection was made along Bavaria
Road at 86th Street. Both cities are working with Carver County to develop a Regional
Trail link near the intersection of CSAH 11 and Shady Oak Drive near Lake Bavaria. A
trail connection is also being reviewed at the intersection of Marsh Lake Road and CSAH
11.
Waconia
Victoria and Waconia each will annex portions of Laketown Township in the future.
Within this annexation area there is an abandoned railway bed which if protected and
developed will create an extension of the LRT trail which currently ends in downtown
Victoria. Victoria and Waconia have agreed to work at making this connection so that
there is a link between the two cities. This link is also important because it will link
Carver Park Preserve and the Lake Waconia Regional Park via a trail connection.
Minnetrista
In 2005 Minnetrista completed a conceptual Park and Trail Master Plan. In reviewing
this plan with the city, there are two possible trail connections that need to be further
researched to determine their feasibility. Minnetrista is planning a trail corridor along the
north side of State Highway 7 that would extend to the western boundary of Victoria. If
37
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
it is possible to connect to this trail it would provide for a link to the Lake Minnetonka
Regional Park located at the intersection of Kings Road and State Highway 7.
Minnetrista is also proposing a second connection to Victoria near the intersection of
CSAH 11 and State Highway 7 in Carver Park Preserve. This connection could
potentially link Victoria to the proposed Dakota Regional Trail in Hennepin County.
Metropolitan Council/Three Rivers Park District
Victoria has been working with Three Rivers Park District to better integrate the city with
Carver Park Preserve. Two opportunities were identified that would create a better
connection between Carver Park Preserve and Victoria. A trail connection from
downtown into the western side of the park has been reviewed with the Park District.
This connection would provide a more direct link into the park and to such facilities as
the Lowry Nature Center and the Auburn Lake Campground. This connection would
originate in downtown and run through the park along the eastern side of CSAH 11. The
second opportunity is to develop a gathering area/trail head in downtown near the
intersection of the LRT and Stieger Lake Lane. This space could become a focal point in
downtown and would create a vital connection between the park preserve and downtown
businesses.
Carver County
As previously mentioned Victoria and Chaska have been working with Carver County to
develop a Regional Trail corridor between the two cities. This corridor has been
incorporated into the proposed future trail system for both cities.
DNR
The DNR has two public boat launch facilities within Victoria. One, located on the
western shore of Lake Virginia was recently reconstructed by the DNR. The city worked
with the DNR on the reconstruction. The second is located on the northern shore of Lake
Wasserman. This boat launch will ultimately need to be reconstructed in the future.
Victoria will work with the DNR to ensure that this will occur.
38
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
VIII. GENERAL GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
A.
Programming Balance
This plan provides level of service standards for facilities and park types to guide new
park development within the city. It will be necessary for the city to manage the
development of new parks and the redevelopment of existing parks in the city. The
development of new parks and facilities will require the careful consideration and review
of the city so that park assets are balanced across all parks. Balancing the programming
and development of new park facilities will prevent several parks in one area from
unconsciously making the same “menu” decisions. The Park and Recreation Committee
will need to work closely with the Planning Commission to ensure a logical outcome is
achieved.
B.
Architectural Standards
The city will use architectural design standards in the parks to influence and encourage
the development of parks consistent with the Park Master Plan. As applied to the park
system, a design standard specifies the physical and spatial attributes of park buildings,
structures and similar features. The standards defined through this plan are intended to
be general in nature and focus on themes and overarching principles. Design and
architectural consideration will need to be given to each individual structure as the park
system develops.
Design standards are defined descriptively and illustratively. For efficiency, the
illustrations are clustered together. Not everything in each illustration is applicable to
any one standard or any combination of the standards. Some illustrations will cover more
than one standard.
Buildings
Buildings should be compatible and complimentary to the buildings already constructed
in an existing park and should incorporate materials, form, color and character of the
buildings shown in the images to follow. Exterior materials shall consist of natural brick,
stone glass and metal. Roofs shall be pitched and be constructed of standing seam metal.
Colors shall be earth tones and blend into the natural surroundings. Roof colors shall be
black, brown or dark green.
39
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
Materials and Colors
Roof and Style
December 22, 2005
Roof and Style
Materials and Style
Lighting
Lights provided in parks shall be consistent with the lights depicted in the following
pictures. The city standard will be black in color and shall include a non-glare type
fixture. Poles shall be painted black and include banner arms where recommended by the
city. Lighting shall be provided for all parking areas where facilities can be used past
daylight hours. The city may require interior safety lighting within Neighborhood and
Community Parks. This will need to be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Park and
Recreation Committee.
40
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Park Benches
Park benches shall be consistent with the benches shown in the following images. The
benches are constructed of Teak wood. Benches should be secured to a hard surface
using a molly type fastener on all legs. Benches should be located throughout all parks.
Benches should be installed near play ground areas, sports courts (tennis, volleyball and
basketball), as part of a scenic overlook or natural amenity and along trails within the
park system.
Wood Bench
Metal Bench
Signage
All new parks shall include a sign indicating the name of the park. Signs shall be
constructed to match the existing park signs designed and installed by the city in existing
parks. Signs shall be located along the public streets where possible and at all major
entrances into a park from a public street. Signs should be lighted for all parks that have
facilities that stay open beyond regular daylight hours. Lighting shall be screened so that
there is no glare spilled onto adjacent roadways or residential areas. An example of an
existing park sign is shown below.
41
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
C.
December 22, 2005
Park Design and Maintenance Standards
Design
Parks design will vary considerably from site to site due to existing features, road layout
and the overall design of new developments. Parks shall be laid out in an orderly and
well thought out manner so that all features have accessibility from a public street and or
public trail/sidewalk. All parks should be designed so that they become a prominent
feature within a development and are positioned to have at least one side on a public
street. Community Parks should have three (3) points of public access/frontage with at
least two (2) allowing vehicular access. Neighborhood Parks should have two (2) points
of public access with at least one (1) allowing vehicular access. Mini Parks should have
one (1) point of public access. The aforementioned minimums may not be necessary or
possible if the parks are located directly adjacent to a major amenity such as a lake, pond,
wetland or similar natural feature.
Off-street parking shall be incorporated into Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks,
Large Urban Parks and Sports Complexes. The number of parking spaces shall be
determined by the type of equipment and facilities incorporated into the park (see parking
standards).
Trails shall connect all features within a park to each other including parking and to the
surrounding trails and or sidewalks that lead into the park. Trails shall conform to the
design standards established within this plan.
Where practical and justified by level of use, all active use parks should include the
following elements:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Security lighting in parking areas and, where needed, on trails
Drinking fountains
Portable toilets
Benches, bicycle racks, picnic tables
Visible and safe pedestrian access via public streets, trails and sidewalks
Internal trails between activity areas
Landscaping, including shade, evergreen and ornamental trees
Maintenance and Replacement
See Field Design and Maintenance and Replacement Standards.
D.
Field / Court Design, Maintenance and Replacement Standards
Design
The standards for recreational and athletic facilities are expressed in many ways. These
standards are compiled from numerous sources and range from rigid dimensions to
42
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
suggestions derived from experience. Adherence to standards assures the user of
continuity in their experience, regardless of the location. Conversely, the design needs to
be sensitive to necessary adjustments in the standards as demanded by site specific
conditions and budget.
Development of fields and courts should consider spectator seating, orientation and
distance from parking and safety fencing. Consideration of these items will be based on
the site specific design and will need to be reviewed independently for each faculty
developed or redeveloped.
Fields design should meet the standards established in Figures 4-8.
Maintenance and Replacement
Fields shall be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion and in accordance with the
following guidelines:
ƒ
Description:
A facility that is mostly active. These facilities consist primarily
of athletic playing fields.
ƒ
Monitored:
Regularly for litter and debris, when in season.
ƒ
Cutting
Height:
2 ½” to 3 ½” will be maintained.
ƒ
Fertilization/
Herbicide:
Spring and fall, the City will fertilize in the spring and will not
spray herbicide during the school year and will always notify the
school in writing (2) two weeks prior to any application.
ƒ
Irrigation:
With automatic system as needed. All systems will be maintained
by the City including the system in the school parking lot and
around the school building.
ƒ
Ag lime:
Maintained within 1” of grass.
ƒ
Infields:
Playing fields are dragged and groomed as needed.
ƒ
Fencing:
Backstops and fencing will be maintained in a safe and useable
manner.
ƒ
Resting of
Fields:
Periodically fields will be taken out of service in order to
undertake necessary turf reestablishment.
43
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Tennis / Basketball courts should be maintained in a safe and “useable condition”.
General maintenance such as crack sealing and net replacement should be performed
regularly throughout the life of the court. The city should visually inspect the court every
year and document the findings. Courts with large cracks or uneven surfaces that could
cause an unsafe playing condition should be improved at by performing the required
maintenance or replacement.
E.
Equipment Design, Maintenance and Replacement Standards
Design
Optimal playground designs will provide a play environment that offers opportunities for
development of motor skills, make believe, building, competitions and solitary activities.
Activities that are linked together so that many children can use them simultaneously are
generally preferred to isolated apparatus. Play structures and activities are typically
divided into two primary age categories. Equipment should offer separate opportunities
for 2-5 year olds and 6-12 year olds. Playgrounds should meet ADA accessibility
requirements.
Playgrounds should be designed in a manner which allows supervisors/parents to watch
multiple children playing on multiple structures. Swings should be separated from the
other spaces via a walk or other natural or constructed barrier delineating the space.
Benches and or other seating areas should be liberally provided throughout the
playground area. Trash receptacles should be located at every playground. Shade trees
shall be installed to provide shade for sitting and should screen hot southern sunlight
from equipment. The city’s standard surfacing is 12” of an ADA approved hardwood
mulch (various vendors).
Safety measures shall be the most important consideration when designing playgrounds.
All equipment manufactures provide safety (clear) zone dimensions for each piece of
equipment. These standards should be considered minimums when designing the
playground. After determining the use zone of each piece of equipment, at least eight (8)
feet between clear zones and hard surfaces should be allowed.
Equipment should vary from playground to playground so that different play
opportunities are offered throughout the city. Swings should be provided at every
playground developed in the system and include toddler as well as ADA approved
swings. The city has historically used equipment consistent with that already existing in
the city playgrounds. This consistency aids the city when it comes to inspecting
equipment, general maintenance and replacement of parts. The following images are
examples of equipment used in existing playgrounds:
44
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Typical Playground
Toddler Play Area (2-5 yrs.)
45
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Typical Swing Area
Maintenance and Replacement
The Park Department will chart the maintenance by annually completing a safety
inspection of each playground. The safety inspection will identify general maintenance
and replacement needs for each piece of equipment. The following standards are general
and provide a reference guideline.
F.
ƒ
Every year – Visually inspect equipment and fill out safety audit form
ƒ
Twenty (20) years – Replacement is typically required at this point;
however it will vary from site to site.
Trail Design, Maintenance and Replacement Standards
Design
All new trails constructed in the city will be paved bituminous with a minimum width of
8 ½ feet. Regional trails shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width with surfacing to be
determined by the city at the time of development. When laying out a new trail in the
system the first step will be to identify the origin and destination points. The trail route
shall then be designed based on the type of trail needed, existing topography, subdivision
design, natural amenities and location of existing and proposed roadways.
The city will develop both on street and off street trails within its system. On street trails
shall provide for a direct route between the origin and destination points. Off street trails
should be designed to carefully integrate aesthetic and natural features into the route.
Special consideration should be given to key views, high quality woodland areas, lake
and water frontage and wetland complexes.
46
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Trails shall be designed to meet the established engineering specifications adopted in the
City of Victoria Standard Details and Specifications. These standards are updated on
a frequent basis and should be referenced to ensure that the current specification is being
followed. The specifications outline the trail construction section, trail location and
setbacks from streets and wetlands, required drainage measures and trail slope parameters
for both horizontal and vertical curves. The city will work with new developments to
ensure that the trails proposed meet the established design criteria and are routed so that
all necessary connections are made and future connections can be made with ease.
Maintenance and Replacement
Trails will need to be regularly maintained by the city to ensure enjoyment and use for
future generations of residents. Trails that are constructed based on the city standards
should have an approximate live span of twenty (20) years. The actual number of years
that a trail will last varies from trail to trail. The city should establish a trail maintenance
and replacement plan so that adequate funding is allocated for the required maintenance
and replacement of existing trails.
In general, when trails are in maintained and kept in a safe and “useable” condition, they
offer a variety of recreational opportunities to the residences. Trails that are not
maintained and fall into an unsafe condition (i.e. cracks, uneven surfaces, the appearance
of loose gravel or sub base), should be brought up to a “useable” standard. The following
standards are general and provide a reference guideline.
G.
ƒ
Every year – Inspect Trails
ƒ
Seven (7) years – Seal Coat and/or Crack Seal
ƒ
Twenty (20) years – Reconstruction
Landscape Design, Maintenance and Replacement Standards
Design
Detailed landscape design will vary from park to park and should be determined on a
park by park basis. There are, however, some elements that can be carried throughout all
of the parks in the park system. These elements should be incorporated into the park
plans where appropriate.
Shade trees should be the primary form of landscaping within all parks in the city’s
system. Shade trees shall be of a variety that is consistent with those identified in the
city’s zoning ordinance. Flowering ornamental trees and evergreen trees should be
integrated into the landscape to add seasonal interest. Evergreen trees and shrubs can be
used for screening and buffering between non compatible uses.
47
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Maintenance and Replacement
Trees, shrubs and ornamental landscape areas within the parks will need to be routinely
maintained by the city. This will include regular annual pruning and fertilizing.
Maintenance and replacement will be done as needed. Natural woodland areas will
require regular maintenance in an effort to reduce and prevent non-native invasive
species from taking hold. The city should visually inspect all woodland areas within the
park system to determine the quality and possible degradation of a particular area.
Following inspection a maintenance plan should be put together that will address each
area in need on an on-going basis.
Below is a list of landscape improvements and maintenance objectives which should be
considered by the city in all new and existing parks.
ƒ
Managing pond and wetland edges with native buffer vegetation.
ƒ
Managing exotic and invasive plant species.
ƒ
Providing weed control (this may include periodic mowing and or burning).
ƒ
Replacement of existing turf areas with native plantings to establish meadows,
prairies, and wetlands.
ƒ
Maintaining and improving views to ponds and vistas.
48
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
IX. Implementation and Prioritization
A.
Priority / Phasing of Park Development
The Master Plan provides a general framework of ideas, standards, concepts and
recommendations to guide the future development of Victoria’s park system. The next
step will be to translate the Park Master Plan into:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Cost Estimates
Priorities
Capital Improvement Program
Implementation Strategy
The Master Plan begins to assign a conceptual order of importance and identifies the first
priorities for improving the system. It provides a framework for short-term decision
making and long-term planning and should be revisited during planning and capital
budgeting discussions.
Elements of the Master Plan will need to be implemented on a coordinated basis.
Development or redevelopment of all parks will require careful consideration by the city.
It will become paramount for the city to balance the programming and development of all
new and existing facilities so that the desired level of service standards are consistently
achieved throughout the life of this plan. A fixed mechanism to ensure this balance is not
provided by this plan. The Park and Recreation Committee will need to review all plans
for new development and redevelopment to ensure proper programming and level of
service standards are realized.
The Master Plan is based on projected growth of the city which is estimated by several
sources. The city does not control the rate or timing of the development of private
property. Development of new parks and facilities is based on unknown variables which
makes implementation and prioritization of this plan more complex. Standards, ideas and
recommendations in this plan provide tools for the city to use while establishing priorities
and implementation strategies.
Within the next three (3) years the city should focus on updating and developing existing
parks within the system to bring them up to standard and cure any deficiencies identified
through this Plan. Update and development of the existing system cannot come at the
expense of developing the new system concurrent with new development. The city will
need to balance the development of the total system so that the Park Master Plan can be
completed.
Prioritization of new park development or redevelopment of existing parks should be
based on the following criteria which are listed in order of importance:
ƒ Construction of infill trails based on the priorities established in this plan.
49
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
ƒ Construction of new trails which will connect to existing trails to create loops or
links in the trail system.
ƒ Improvements to existing parks and facilities that will bring the city into closer to
compliance with the adopted level of service standards.
ƒ Development of existing Neighborhood Parks with facilities to meet the adopted
level of service standards.
ƒ Development of new Neighborhood Parks simultaneously with new residential
development. This will include development of new facilities within the parks to
meet the adopted level of service standards.
ƒ Development/acquisition of land for Community Parks.
Project opportunities come from many sources, including many that are unforeseeable.
While the Master Plan identifies a prioritization of projects from park updates to Big
Ideas, developers, residents, government agencies and other groups may present
opportunities. Projects and development opportunities for the park system that are not
included in the Master Plan can generally be prioritized using the following criteria:
B.
ƒ
Is the improvement/concept aligned with the priorities of the community?
ƒ
Is the improvement/concept already on the project list?
ƒ
Does the improvement/concept have documented support of the community,
business leaders and city government?
ƒ
Does the improvement/concept serve a broad cross-section of the community?
ƒ
Is the improvement/concept consistent with the nature and goals or the Park
Master Plan?
ƒ
Are there adequate funds available to develop and implement the idea?
ƒ
Will there be adequate funds to maintain the facility once developed?
Priority of Big Ideas
As previously stated in the Plan, the Big Ideas are those pieces that when thoroughly
integrated will form a holistic plan. Big Ideas as expressed by their name are “big” and
will require further study by the City. This may be done on an idea by idea basis tackling
one at a time. The Park and Recreation Committee will be charged with the spearheading
the task of forming implementation strategies for each idea. Implementation of the Big
Ideas will require both public and private commitment. In many cases, a cooperative
50
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
effort will be necessary. Thus, implementation is not automatic and will require the
conscious effort and proper timing consistent with physical conditions, economic
opportunities and financial capability of the City and private sector.
Synthesizing the information gathered through the planning process, the input of the City
Council, Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Committee and input provided by
residents and stake holders, has lead to the prioritization of the Big Ideas. Big Ideas are
listed in order of priority by the city.
Big Ideas
1. Trail Connectivity
2. Large Urban Park
3. Waterfront Park
4. Green Ribbon System
5. Urban Town Square
6. Lake Tamarack Park Preserve
7. Victoria’s Gateways
8. Sports Complex
C.
General Timeline of Trigger Points for Big Ideas
Actual timeframes for the initiation and development of the big ideas is difficult to
formulate due to the many variables that affect development. In order to organize the
ideas into a more tangible information, the city has established trigger points that when
reached signify the necessity to begin the development of these ideas. The population
indicated in the following summaries refers to the actual population when the idea is
completed.
Trail Connectivity
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
0-15 years
Trigger Point: Without delay
Population:
N/A
Funding:
New development, general funds and grants
Comments:
Trails can be constructed at the time that conditions
allow. Infilling the existing trail system should be completed as soon as
possible so that the growth of the overall system can move forward
51
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
without major gaps. There will always be pieces within the trail system
that cannot be developed in sync due to the unknown timeframe and lack
of timing control of new development and subdivisions.
Large Urban Park
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
2-7 years
Trigger Point: 50% of population when completed (7,500)
Population:
15,000
Funding:
Funding source will need to be identified
Comments:
Large Urban Parks will require the acquisition of a
large tract of land and therefore the process to develop these parks should
be commenced well ahead of the intended completion time. For this
reason it is recommended that the city begin the process of devising an
implementation strategy within the next two (2) years
Waterfront Park
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
0-5 years
Trigger Point: Without delay
Population:
10,000
Funding:
Park dedication requirements
Comments:
Opportunities for Waterfront Parks will vary based on
the development or subdivision of land adjacent to water bodies. This
plan identifies two (2) opportunities for the development of Waterfront
Parks. Additional opportunities may present themselves as development
continues. The city should look to develop a Waterfront Park concurrent
with the development of property around the body of water.
Green Ribbon System
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
0-15 years
Trigger Point: Without delay
Population:
N/A
Funding:
New development, park dedication requirements
Comments:
The Green Ribbon System is that component of the
Park Master Plan which ties all other components together. Pieces of this
system have already been developed. The Green Ribbon System will
require the preservation and acquisition of the corridor as new property is
subdivided for development. Through the city’s planning process this
system can be acquired and developed in accordance with this plan.
52
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Urban Town Square
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
Trigger Point:
0-5 years
Phase II of the Downtown Redevelopment,
Development of the Urban Node located at CSAH 11
and CSAH 10
Population:
N/A
Funding:
Park dedication requirements
Comments:
There are two proposed Urban Parks identified within
this plan. The first is located in the existing urban node in downtown
Victoria. This area is currently being studied for redevelopment. It is
imperative that an Urban Town Square be incorporated into the Phase II
development plan so as not to miss this opportunity. The second is
proposed to be located at the intersection of CSAH 11 and CSAH 10 in the
future annexation area of Laketown Township. The acquisition and
development of this square will need to occur simultaneously with the
development.
Lake Tamarack Park Preserve
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
0-10 years
Trigger Point: Development/Subdivision of Land Surrounding Lake
Population:
N/A
Funding:
New development, park dedication requirements
Comments:
Development of this Park Preserve will require the
cooperation of private and public land owners. The city will need to
acquire and preserve the land necessary for creating this preserve at the
time of development. The city has acquired some land through park
dedication for this preserve.
Victoria’s Gateways
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
0-15 years
Trigger Point: Funding
Population:
N/A
Funding:
Funding source not identified
Comments:
Development of Victoria’s Gateways will need to be
done when funding for this improvement becomes available. There are
gateways identified within the existing city limits that should become the
priority. The city will need to study the location, land acquisition and
development costs in order to better understand the scope of this idea.
Development of future Gateways should be done simultaneously with the
development of the land.
53
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Sports Complex
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Timeframe:
0-15 years
Trigger Point: 15,000
Population:
20,000
Funding:
Park dedication, additional sources (i.e. user fees)
Comments:
The city surveyed established communities in the
metropolitan area to understand the timeframe for the development of this
type of facility. This type of facility was generally constructed in
established communities when the cost could be absorbed by the city. It is
recommended that the city prepare a strategy to acquire land early on in
the process and prior to the need to construct the facility. This will reduce
the cost to construct the facility in the future.
54
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
X.
APPENDIX
A.
Background
December 22, 2005
a. The City of Victoria and Laketown Township adopted an Orderly
Annexation agreement in December, 1976.
b. The first Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the Victoria City Council
on June 2, 1983. This plan was primarily a land use plan.
c. The second Comprehensive Plan was adopted on April 5, 1993 and was
titled the 1992-2010 Comprehensive Plan.
i. The 1992 Plan established 11 goals that have essentially stayed the
same throughout the last 12 years.
ii. The 11 goals are as follows:
1. Identity – Preserve small town rural qualities while
allowing development.
2. Environment – Protect lakes, wetlands, woods, parks and
wildlife, and use these amenities to attract development.
3. Downtown – Redevelop for prime retail, service, office,
medical and entertainment.
4. Industrial Park – Facilitate redevelopment by establishing
an Industrial Park and attract favorable (tax) development.
5. Transportation – Promote functional and aesthetic
improvements including landscaping, pedestrian and bike
facilities.
6. Recreation – Take advantage of the parks and natural
qualities and provide recreation serving the varying needs
of the Community.
7. Services – Establish/maintain a balance between extending
services and ability to pay.
8. Fiscal – Maintain or improve fiscal condition; have a stable
tax level relying on new growth to fund public costs.
9. Community Cohesion – Achieve cohesiveness by linking
the Community and improving communications.
10. Quality Development – Require development to be of high
quality (design and material) and achieved on a planned
basis.
11. Annexation – Shall be orderly, fiscally sound and property
annexed to be fairly treated relative to taxes and services.
d. The third Comprehensive Plan was adopted on November 12, 1998. This
plan was titled the 1998-2020 Comprehensive Plan.
55
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
i. The 1998 Plan was truly an update to the previously adopted 1992
Plan. The 12 goals identified through the 1992 Plan remained
unchanged. The 1998 Plan was developed following a series of
long range planning meetings held by the Planning Commission
and City Council in 1996 and 1997.
ii. The proposed land uses in the 1998 Plan remained mostly
unchanged from the 1992 Plan.
e. Development Moratorium
i. The city of Victoria placed two development moratoriums in place
during the last 10 years. The first was enacted in 1997 and the
second in 2000. The total length of the moratoriums was
approximately two years. The moratoriums allowed the city to
complete vital land use plans, utility plans and update the City
Ordinances.
B.
Related Studies
The City of Victoria has undertaken many planning studies during the last 15
years that have become the foundation for the Comprehensive Plan.
The studies that have been completed by the city are as follows:
a. East Side Focus Study
1. Adopted December 19, 1996 by the Victoria City
Council.
2. Prepared by SRF Consulting and involved property
owner interviews, outside agency input and a public
information meeting.
b. Downtown Redevelopment Plan
1. Adopted November, 1996 by the Victoria City
Council.
2. Involved many Downtown Committee Meetings,
presentations by Ernst Associates, Thibault
Associates, interviews of the downtown property
owners and several public information meetings.
56
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
c. Conservation Subdivision Design
1. Adopted in January, 1997 by the Victoria City
Council.
2. Prepared by Thibault Associates in conjunction with
the Planning Commission and City Council.
Several property owners were involved with the
study.
d. West Side Focus Study
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council on
November 17, 1998.
2. Prepared by Thibault Associates and involved field
visits, discussions and meetings with property
owners, analysis and preparation of concept plans
and presentation of the concept plan to the Council
and Planning Commission.
e. Comprehensive Sewer System Plan
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council on July
1, 2002.
2. Prepared by TKDA and involved the input of the
Victoria City Council, Planning Commission and
outside agencies such as the Metropolitan Council.
f. Comprehensive Water System Plan
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council on
August 30, 2002.
2. Prepared by TKDA and involved the input of the
Victoria City Council, Planning Commission and
outside agencies such as the Metropolitan Council.
g. South Sub Area Plan
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council in
December, 2002.
2. Prepared by SRF Consulting and involved
interviews of the 48 property owners, meetings with
Laketown Township Officials, input of the Victoria
City Council, Planning Commission and outside
agencies, several public information meetings and a
public hearing in front of the Planning Commission.
57
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
h. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council on
March 4, 2004.
2. Prepared by DSU, Inc., Westwood Professionals,
Applied Ecological, The 106 Group and Braslou
Associates, and involved the input of the Victoria
City Council, Planning Commission through several
meetings, many outside agencies and two public
information meetings with the Planning
Commission and City Council.
i. Master Plan 2003
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council on
December 18, 2003.
2. Prepared by DSU, Inc. and involved the input of the
Victoria City Council, Planning Commission,
property owners and or parties with land interests in
the study area, outside agencies such as School
District 112, and several public information
meetings.
j. Water Resource Management Plan
1. Reviewed and approved by the City Council in
May, 2004.
2. Prepared by TKDA and involved the input of the
Victoria City Council and outside agencies such as
the Minnesota PCA and the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District.
k. Carver County/Victoria/Laketown Township/Waconia Transportation
Study
1. Reviewed by the Planning Commission and City
Council on October 19, 2004.
2. Prepared by SRF Consulting and involved the input
of the Victoria Planning Commission, City Staff,
Carver County Staff, Waconia Staff and the
Laketown Township Board Members.
l. 2004 Comprehensive Plan Addendum
58
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
1. The 2004 Comprehensive Plan is again an
Addendum to the previously adopted 1998
Comprehensive Plan. The primary purpose of the
addendum is to create a more accurate projection of
the future population of Victoria. The need for this
update has been created primarily by the pace of
growth within this region. The city and the
Metropolitan Council have realized that the
population projected through the 1998
Comprehensive Plan was going to fall short. It was
identified that a new projection was necessary. The
new projection caused the overall population in the
city to nearly triple by the year 2020.
2. The previously mentioned Goals defined in the
1992 and 1998 Comprehensive Plan are still valid
and were incorporated into the current plan
amendment where applicable.
59
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
C.
December 22, 2005
Community Survey
Survey Instrument
Parks and Recreation
Park User Survey
Conducted by
City of Victoria, Minnesota
Parks and Recreation Department
8475 Kochia Lane
Victoria, MN 55386
(952) 443-3140
March 2004
60
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
2003 PARKS & RECREATION USER SURVEY
1. In which of the following leisure activities do you or others in your household participate
regularly? Check all that apply.
Art/Crafts
141
Festivals
10 Hobbies
84
Baseball
95
Fishing
144 Ice Skating/Hockey 110
Basketball
120
Fitness/Aerobics 178 In-Line Skating
71
Biking
228
Football
40 Picnics
116
BMX Racing
3
Golf
203 Play Parks
133
Camping
85
Gymnastics
33 Racquetball
33
Dance
59
Hiking
121
Skateboarding
35
Do not participate in any activities 2
Softball
58
Swimming
182
Tennis
75
Walking/Jogging
309
Weight Training
158
Visit Nature Reserves156
2. For each of the following functions performed by the City of Victoria, please indicate if you feel the
City is doing an excellent, good, fair, or poor job.
a. Providing places for quiet enjoyment of the outdoors
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 44 ‫ ٱ‬Good
147
‫ ٱ‬Fair
79
‫ ٱ‬Poor
27
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 46
‫ ٱ‬Poor
3
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 19
b. Providing places for enjoyment of active sports
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 56 ‫ ٱ‬Good
183
‫ ٱ‬Fair
79
c. Providing places for indoor recreation and fitness activities
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 57 ‫ ٱ‬Good
185
‫ ٱ‬Fair
67
‫ ٱ‬Poor
6
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 23
‫ ٱ‬Poor
4
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 33
d. Operating parks and facilities that are safe
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 45 ‫ ٱ‬Good
189
‫ ٱ‬Fair 44
e. Operating parks and facilities that are clean/well-maintained
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 42 ‫ ٱ‬Good
193
‫ ٱ‬Fair
59
‫ ٱ‬Poor
9
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 27
95
‫ ٱ‬Poor
18
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 81
‫ ٱ‬Poor
36
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 96
‫ ٱ‬Poor
28
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 57
4
‫ ٱ‬Don’t Know 47
f. Managing tax dollars efficiently
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 23 ‫ ٱ‬Good
102
‫ ٱ‬Fair
g. Allocating resources fairly to different areas of the City
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 15 ‫ ٱ‬Good
119
‫ ٱ‬Fair
85
h. Providing natural area for wildlife (habitat)
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 35 ‫ ٱ‬Good
157
‫ ٱ‬Fair
74
i. Maintaining the urban forest (along trail system)
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 31 ‫ ٱ‬Good
162
‫ ٱ‬Fair
72
‫ ٱ‬Poor
j. Managing natural resources wisely (e.g. water conservation)
‫ ٱ‬Excellent 12 ‫ ٱ‬Good
83
‫ ٱ‬Fair
101
‫ ٱ‬Poor
5
‫ ٱ‬Don’t know 77
61
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
3. Using a five-point scale where “1” means “Very Satisfied” and “5” mean “Very Dissatisfied”,
please indicate your overall satisfaction with the availability of the following types of recreational
PROGRAMS in the City of Victoria by circling the corresponding number
Satisfaction Level
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
V.
W.
X.
Adaptive/special Olympics
Adult Aquatic Fitness Programs
Adult Exercise/Fitness Classes
Adult Open Hockey
Adult Swim Lessons
Adult Sport Leagues
After School Programs
City Wide Special Events
Family Open Hockey
Golf Programs
Open Gym
Open Ice Skating
Other senior Programs (trips,
Arts/crafts, music classes, etc.)
Preschool Programs
Recreation Classes
Senior Exercise Programs
Senior Sports Leagues
Soccer Programs
Summer Recreation Programs
Summer Sports Camps
Teen Programs
Youth At Risk Programs
Youth Sports Programs
Youth Swim Programs
18
16
1 25
1 23
17
1 10
18
1 16
1 16
19
1 29
1 22
15
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
10
62
47
25
6
25
65
48
33
61
45
18
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
26
86
50
32
55
49
85
53
51
59
55
47
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
7
32
31
16
23
21
24
28
14
19
20
20
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
11
74
14
14
53
15
16
10
11
19
8
10
20
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
242
217
108
137
173
163
159
124
148
134
113
132
188
19
1 10
15
13
19
19
16
16
14
17
15
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
32
33
14
12
26
30
25
10
4
31
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
30
53
21
20
36
36
39
26
21
29
14
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
17
14
9
5
25
18
19
19
13
20
38
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
1
8
15
14
13
11
18
16
36
42
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
168
164
195
207
172
136
176
187
188
160
217
4. Which FOUR of the four programs listed above are most important to the members of your
household?
(Please write in the letters below for your 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th choices using the letters from the list
in question #3 above.)
___C_
1st
__C-K_
2nd
__S__
3rd
___0__
4th
5. Please CHECK ALL the reasons that keep you or other members of your household from using
Victoria Parks and Recreation facilities more often.
(1) Parks do not contain the
facilities we need. 112
(6) Fees are too expensive. 82
(11) The City does not
have quality recreational
programs. 32
(2) Facilities do not have the
equipment. 68
(7) Facilities are not wellmaintained. 14
(12) We are too busy or not
interested. 68
(3) Security is insufficient. 2
(8) Members of my household use (13) Rules are to restrictive.
facilities in other communities. 100
10
(4) Hours of operation are not
convenient. 31
(9) Poor customer service by staff. 4(14) Not enough trees/shade.
18
62
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
(5) The location of the City
(10) I do not know where the City. (15) None of the above. 49
facilities is not close to my home. facilities are located. 58
34
6. Using a five-point scale where “1” means “Very Satisfied” and “5” means “Very Dissatisfied”,
please indicate your overall satisfaction with the availability of the following types of recreational
FACILITIES in the City of Victoria by circling the corresponding number. Also, please indicate
if you or other members of your household have participated in City programs during the past
two years by circling “yes” or “no”.
Satisfaction Level
A.
B.
C.
E.
F
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
N.
O.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
V.
Basketball/Softball Fields
1 40
Soccer Fields
1 39
Skate Parks
1 23
Municipal golf Courses
1 23
Indoor Skating Rink
1 83
Skate Park
1 26
Indoor Gym and Fitness Space
1 46
Play Equipment
1 16
Playgrounds for Children
1 15
Picnic Facilities/Shelters
1 21
Walking and Biking Trails
1 37
Neighborhood Parks
1 27
Large Multi-use Parks for Both
Active and Passive Recreation
1 19
P. Urban Fishing Lakes (Tamarack)
No 177
Community Gardens
1 11
Community Recreational Centers 1 24
Senior Recreational Centers
1 4
Basketball
1 15
Fitness Center
1 28
Drop In Daycare
1 8
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
59
26
22
62
40
26
47
34
38
46
48
45
Yes 152
Yes 73
Yes 80
Yes 121
Yes 103
Yes 91
Yes 177
Yes 141
Yes 167
Yes 136
Yes 240
Yes 197
No 191
No 219
No 196
No 151
No 157
No 150
No 67
No 121
No 129
No 110
No 69
No 93
2 32 3 30 4 20 5 5 Don’t Know 58
Yes 128
1 11 2 23 3 23 4 6 5 3 Don’t Know 87
No 130
Yes 86
2
2
2
2
2
2
No 185
No 177
No 197
No 150
No 133
No 181
3
33
7
23
39
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
20
19
23
22
16
20
32
30
23
27
31
12
22
11
25
22
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
18
20
27
18
15
14
13
23
28
18
14
24
14
13
3
10
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
19
17
4
4
3
15
15
14
7
8
Have you participated in
this type of program
within the last 2 years?
4
5
1
2
4
5
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
Don’t Know
80
77
59
68
61
70
53
50
48
45
30
41
95
69
98
73
59
104
Yes 61
Yes 142
Yes 45
Yes 108
Yes 137
Yes 38
7. Which FOUR of the facilities listed above are most important to members of your household?
(Please write
in the letters below for your 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th choices using the letters from the list in question #6
above)
__L__
1st
__L_
2nd
__L__
3rd
__L__
4th
8. If additional funds were available for the Victoria Parks and Recreation Department’s facilities,
how would you allocate the funds among the categories of funding listed below? Please rank the
following categories 1-7, 1 = 1st choice, 2 = 2nd choice, 3 = 3rd choice, 4 = 4th choice, 5 = 5th choice, 6 =
6th choice, 7 = 7th choice, 8 = 8th choice and 9 = 9th choice.
_274__ Improvements/maintenance of existing parks.
_250__ Construction of environmental facilities (wildlife areas, nature trails).
_263__ Acquisition/development of walking and biking trails.
_253__ Development of special facilities (dog parks, water playgrounds, campgrounds, skate
parks, etc).
_244__ Acquisition of open space areas and areas for preservation.
63
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
_196__ Development of an indoor nature/environmental center.
_201__ Additional Neighborhood parks.
_183__ Swimming pool (indoor).
_191__ Swimming pool (outdoor).
_35___ Other, please list.__________________________
9.
Should the Victoria Field House expand the current food menu? Yes_82___ No_214___? 1
64
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
X.
December 22, 2005
FIGURES
Figure 1
65
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 2
66
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 3
67
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 4
68
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 5
Baseball
69
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 6
Basketball
Figure 7
Football
70
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 8
Tennis
71
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 9
72
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 10
73
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 11
74
Victoria – Park, Trails and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
December 22, 2005
Figure 12
75