CHAPTER 5 Civil Rights, Equality, and Social Movements Learning Objectives 5.1 Define civil rights and the three types of equality: political, social, and economic 5.2 List the means groups employ to pursue equality within and outside the system. 5.3 Assess the history of racial discrimination against African Americans, including the role courts played in initially denying African Americans full equality. 5.4 Describe the Court-created framework of equality, the voting rights legislation, and the challenges they have presented in recent times. 5.5 Evaluate the more recent battles waged over affirmative action and racial profiling. 5.6 Summarize the history of women's rights, including the role of the courts in recognizing such rights, from women's suffrage up through the present. 5.7 Explain Title IX's effect on women's rights. 5.8 Trace the struggles for equality waged by other racial, religious, and ethnic groups, including Native Americans, Asian Americans, Muslims, and Hispanic Americans. 5.9 Discuss the struggles of older Americans, Americans with disabilities, and gays and lesbians. 2 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Types of Equality Civil Rights- protected rights of 3 individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by governments or individuals. The 14th Amendment (1868) introduced the notion of equality into the Constitution by specifying that a state could not deny “any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws.” Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Types of Equality Political Equality-voting, running for office, petition the government tor redress of grievances,free speech, free press, and the access to an education Social Equality-public and private to stores, theaters, restaurants, hotels, and public transportation Economic Equality-Equality of 4 opportunity or equality of results. Do not agree with your book regarding equality of results. ( Communism/Socialism) ( A little earlier than book) Different Standards The Equal Protection Clause and Constitutional Standards of Review If government has a law that treats individuals and groups differently in different areas, different standards of review are used to evaluate the constitutionality. 5 Suspect Classification Strict Judicial Scrutiny- Reserved for Fundamental freedoms (including religion, speech, assembly, press) and for areas including race, ethnicity, and citizenship Is the classification (discrimination) necessary to the accomplishment of a permissible state goal? Is it the least restrictive way to reach that goal?(narrowly focused). Tends to invalidate almost all state laws that segregate on racial, ethnicity, and citizenship. 6 7 Exceedingly persuasive / Intermediate standard – gender. Does the classification serve an important governmental objective and is it substantially related to those ends? VMI Institute/Draft Rationality standard to some state objective-age, wealth, mental retardation, and sexual orientation. Is there any rational foundation for the discrimination? (Obergefell decision changed the sexual orientation as far as same sex marriage. (On the due process clause and equal protection) The Struggle for Equality: Approaches and Tactics Booker T Washington/accommodation Working within the Political System. Contrary to book, Washington was not giving up the right to vote. Education and respect would gain the prestige W.E.B Du Bois (agitation) Litigation Legal Boycott Civil Disobedience 8 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction Missouri compromise-No slavery above 36 degree latitude William Lloyd Garrison 1831 Liberator-”fatal characteristic” of slavery was that it denied African Americans the basic legal rights to own property, enter into contracts, and testify in courts 9 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction Many abolitionists believed in economic rights but not political rights. Did not think emancipation automatically entitled freed slaves to the right to vote or serve on juries Missouri admitted to the union as a slave state and to maintain the balance of slave and free states, Maine was carved out of a portion of Massachusetts. 10 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction Harriet Beecher Stowe: Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852) Dred Scot v. Sanford (1857) Blacks were “so inferior and no rights to be respected” and were to be considered as property 11 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction 1861-states rights and territorial expansion and slavery. Emancipation Proclamation declared the freedom of all slaves in states fighting the Union and allowed blacks to enlist in the Union army By 1865, the war was essentially transformed into a battle over the end of the institutionalization of slavery 12 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction After Civil War (1865), African Americans could legally marry, worship, and travel to other parts . Still there were problems with states allowing for “full rights.” Black Codes –denying most legal rights to newly freed slaves; passed by southern states following the Civil War. 13 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction 1865-1877 Reconstruction-mixed blessing for the slaves Because of the Black Codes initiated by some states, the Federal Government saw the need to add amendments to the Constitution Civil War Amendments13th Amendment (1865)- Banished slavery from all states 14 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction 14 Amendment (1868)-Full US and State citizenship to people born/naturalized in the US and the equal protection of the law . Also, barred states from abridging “the privileges or immunities of citizenship” or depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. (Passed to negate the infamous Black Codes) 15 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction 15th Amendment(1870) forbade the denial or 16 abridgment of the right to vote by any government on account of race or previous servitude In addition to the Constitutional amendments the Republican Congress passed the Civil Rights laws of 1866: African Americans could sue, inherit, purchase property, lease, challenge in federal court The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction Congress passed the Civil Rights Laws of 1875- African Americans access to public accommodations and prohibited exclusion African American from jury service. 17 Racial Discrimination: From Slavery to Reconstruction Though Amendments and Congressional laws were passed, there were some negative Supreme Court Cases to follow: Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) Great body of Civil rights still lay under the protection of state government not the US Constitution 1877 Reconstruction ends 18 Civil Rights Cases of (1883) states cannot discriminate but protection of civil rights from individual private discrimination would not violate the Constitution. So restaurants and hotels could freely discriminate. ( Reversal of the 1875 Civil Rights law) 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson- Separate but equal was allowed as long as the equal protection clause was no violation 19 Jim Crow laws in the beginning of the 20th(1890”s1900's) Century-required segregation in public schools, railroads buses, restaurants, hotels, theaters, and other public facilities . Excluded blacks from militia and denied them certain education and welfare service NAACP (1909) Litigation- 20 Political, educational, social, and economic equality Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Struggle for Equality: Approaches and Tactics Various court cases from Table 5.1 P.117 culminating in • Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Cooper v . Aaron (1958) – Cooper v. Aaron (1958) 21 Racial Segregation and Barriers to Equality – Numerous cases brought forth by Thurgood Marshall with the NAACP legal fund. First started with Law Schools and Graduate schools and eventually went for elementary/high schools 22 23 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Brown v Board of Education(1954) Kansas law that required segregated public schools Brought by the NAACP De Jure Segregation-discrimination brought forth by law Overruled Plessy v. Ferguson Discrimination inherently unequal 24 Brown v Board of Education(1954) Did not say anything about the following” De Facto Segregation being constitutional- Discrimination not from laws but from housing patterns (housing) Implementation of Brown v Board of Education (timing) 25 A year later after the Brown decision (1955) the Supreme Court addressed the implementation by declaring to proceed with all deliberate speed Little Rock Arkansas/Gov. Faubus Cooper v. Aaron (1958) -cannot nullify Brown v Board by state legislatures or state executive officials by evasive schemes for segregation 26 Significant and widespread change 27 would not occur until after passage of civil rights legislation in the mid1960's, which gave the executive branch of the government increased power to enforce school desegregation in local districts Federal money into local schools gave extra bite to desegregation Civil Rights Act of 1964- – Banned racial discrimination in all public accommodations including those that were publicly owned; – Prohibited discrimination by employers, and instituted the EEOC to investigate complaints of discrimination – Denied public funds to schools that discriminated in employment 28 Civil Rights Act of 1964- – Congress drew its authority for passing the legislation from the Interstate Commerce Clause 29 The African American Struggle for Equality and Civil Rights 30 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District (1971), the Supreme Court ruled that all vestiges of state imposed segregation from De Jure discrimination, or discrimination by law, must be eliminated at once. The Court also ruled that lower federal courts had the authority to fashion a wide variety of remedies including busing, racial quotas, and the pairing of schools to end, dual segregate school system. White Flight to suburbs. Funds refused later for attempts to draw students back to city. Now go back to Birmingham 1963 -Turning Point in other areas Rosa Parks on transportation. Boycotts on bus system. Sit ins at lunch counters. Nonviolent methods from the SCLC and the student more radical and militant actions. 1963 Letter from Birmingham City Jail TV showing riots and dogs/4 AA school girls killed 31 Letters From Birmingham Jail: MLK had stated the following: One had a moral responsibility to disobey 32 unjust laws Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere Not to seek solace and security in Black Nationalist ideologies August 1963 March on Washington- “I Have A Dream” speech Attention at the Federal level 33 Voting Rights Literary Tests,Grandfather clause, white primary, poll taxes White Primary allowed African Americans to vote only in general elections not primary elections. In the South, the Democrat Primary was the main event because which ever candidate won, they would go on to win the general election. So deprived of picking out the candidate that would go against the other 34 party (grandfather's clause eliminated earlier, white primary eliminated by Smith v. Allright 1944 and poll taxes eliminated at the federal level with the 24th Amendment) Voting Rights Act of 1965 35 Invalidated literacy tests and property requirements. Required select states with histories of voting discrimination to get approval from Department of Justice if voting laws were changed Housing Restrictive Covenants in deed restrictions. Eventually removed. Neighborhoods may write but states cannot be a party to these deed restrictions (1917) The NAACP finally succeeded in undercutting restrictive covenants in Shelley v. Kraemer (1948). 36 Housing (con't) Civil Rights Act of 1964-banned discrimination in all public accommodations, including those privately owned and the withholding of federal funds from discriminatory state and local programs that discriminated in housing Civil Rights Act of 1968- Banned race discrimination in housing, including realtors, and made interference with a citizen's civil rights a federal crime 37 Affirmative Action (Employment) Means different things to different people Quotas, active recruitment, no discrimination with application City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. (1989) dealt with minority business set-aside. The Court applied strict judicial scrutiny to race-conscious efforts to remedy the effects of past discrimination. 38 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. For years, the Court had applied the standard of strict judicial scrutiny to government restriction on measures that disadvantaged individuals based on their race or citizenship status. The Supreme Court found the Richmond city council failed to demonstrate a specific history of discrimination in the city’s construction industry sufficient to justify a race-based program of relief. 39 It was constitutionally unacceptable because 40 it was not narrowly tailored to achieve any goal except “outright racial balancing.” Adarand v. Pena (1995) -White businessman couldn't be considered for bid. Supreme Court said any racial classification may be considered unconstitutional unless it meets the test of strict scrutiny and that it must be narrowly tailored No affirmative action employment plan has been upheld as constitutional since the early 1990's The Civil Rights Act of 1991 declared that hiring 41 practices that have a disproportionate impact on women and minorities must be “job –related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity. The city’s height requirement for police officers would be illegal unless the city could show that a height of at least 5 feet 5 inches was necessary to do the job. Furthermore the Civil Rights Act of 1991 allowed women, minorities, and the disabled to sue for monetary damages in cases of intentional job discrimination and harassment. Ricci case brings up the disproportionate impact Ricci v. DeStefano (2009) Case- Concerned firemen not getting promotions because no African Americans had passed this particular test. Test was not biased. Reverse discrimination would not be allowed even if there is a disproportionate impact on minorities because you still could not ignore equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. Needs to be narrowly drawn. 42 Education (Universities) Affirmative action-Regents of the University of California v. Bakke(1973)- University could take in race and ethnicity along with other elements to bring diversity of outlooks and ideas 43 Education (Universities) 1)Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) upheld university program/ diverse races contributes to a holistic review and contributing to diversity (which the Supreme Court considered a compelling reason) 2)Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Struck down because awarded 20 points. Was more like a quota 44 © Gregory Shamus/Reuters/Corbis Students at the University of Michigan rally in support of affirmative action. In 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the use of affirmative action by the University of Michigan’s Law School but struck down the affirmative action program utilized in that university’s undergraduate admissions. 45 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Fisher v. University-10% rule in Texas. Was never in question. It was the other program, the so called “holistic program” that was used to round out the remaining slots, using race and ethnicity as one factor among many Kennedy-(2016)universities substantial but not total leeway in designing their admission program. Universities in position to define intangible characteristic like student body diversity that are central to its identity and educational mission. 46 However, has to reconcile the pursuit of diversity with the constitutional promise of equal treatment and dignity. Need balancing programs. Relying on 10% rule, encouraged parents to keep in low performing African American schools Thought racial classifications were concrete and amorphous and so compelling reason established. 47 Alito was stunned given the previous oral argument in 2015. UT never gave a coherent explanation for its need to discriminate on the basis of race. Position relied on noxious racial assumptions than inner city African Americans were different from African Americans from other neighborhoods. Statistical data incomplete and did not show a narrow tailoring. 48 Racial Profiling-The law enforcement practice 49 of taking race into account when identifying possible suspects of crime SB 1070 (AZ) Couldn't arrest on mere suspicion but could ask if illegal after an arrest Businesses could require proof of citizenship Trayvon Martin/Zimmerman/Fredie Gray, Mike Brown/North Carolina (gun was present and not book). “No hands up” but perpetuated by media. Oklahoma case and Bland in Texas A policeman interviews several teenagers that he suspects of being undocumented on a street corner in Tucson, Arizona. 50 Copyright ©2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Women's Movement and Gender Equality Judicial Scrutiny of Gender Discrimination and the Equal Rights Amendment19th Amendment in 1920 Several cases sex role stereotypes of women as weak National Organization for Women (NOW)1970's 51 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Equal Rights that no state or congress could deny or abridge equal rights on account of sex ERA-Came 3 votes short of becoming a Constitutional Amendment Supreme Court Uses 14th Amendment Virginia Military Institute (VMI) 1996 – Using “exceedingly persuasive” not strict scrutiny 52 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Ledbetter could not seek redress of grievances under the provisions of the Equal Pay Act for discrimination that had occurred over a period of years because time had run out. (Equal pay Act of 1963- Legislation that requires employers to pay men and women equal pay for equal work.) The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which overruled the Court’s decision bearing her name. Note: addressed only time constraints and not equal pay. 53 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Office of Personnel management conceded factors other than discrimination could contribute to the differences in pay between men and women. Part-time, experience,caregiving responsibilities. factor in and explains some of the discrepancy Physician,lawyers/judges/businesses increased Firefighters, police officers, construction workers not as much 54 Sexual Harassment Quid pro quo harassment –involves a supervisor threatening an employee with retaliation unless the employee submits to sexual advances. “You either sleep with me or you are fired.” Hostile Environment- More difficult. Pervasive harassment in which person is not able to do job. Repeated requests for dates despite rejections. 55 Title IX Three-part test was formulated in the 1970’s and includes the following: Having numbers of male and female athletes proportionate to enrollment Expanding opportunities for the underrepresented gender (usually women) Meeting the interests and abilities of the women on campus 56 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Title IX (1972)- prohibits the exclusion of women from an educational program or activity receiving financial assistance Courts have interpreted those provisions to force colleges and universities to provide as many athletic teams for women as they do for men More programs for women but has also cut out many swimming, gymnastics for men 57 Other Struggles for Equality Native Americans Asian Americans-Korematsu v. U.S. - 1944 the US supreme court upheld the constitutionality of this action. Reverse discrimination in universities 58 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Other Struggles for Equality Hispanic Americans Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) LULAC Voting Rights Act and challenging redistricting plans. Education/Immigration/Driver’s License San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez- To appropriate state funds equally among the school district. 59 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Other Struggles for Equality Senator Marco Rubio, seen here campaigning for Mitt Romney in 2012, looks to build up Republican support among Hispanic voters in Florida and elsewhere. 60 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. AP Images/Rex Features Muslim Americans Hispanic Americans Other Struggles for Equality Older Americans Individuals with Disabilities Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 established a national commitment to such mainstreaming efforts and extended to those with disabilities protection from discrimination in employment and public accommodations comparable to that afforded women and racial minorities under the 1964 Civil Rights Act 61 Other Struggles for Equality Eliminate barrier to their full participation in American society Businesses to make environment accessible and schools to provide additional assistance and accommodations Includes not only neurological but other chronic illnesses and psychological Corrections for disabilities allow In 1999, the US Supreme Court issued decisions redefining and limiting the scope of the ADA 62 Steven Rubin/The Image Works Activists for the rights of individuals with disabilities at a rally advocating broader enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 63 Copyright ©2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Other Struggles for Equality Gays and Lesbians Don't ask, don't tell (1993) Romer v. Evans (1996)- prohibiting any special rights or privileges to homosexuals. Unconstitutional because making one group inferior and state could not state a rational argument. 64 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Other Struggles for Equality Gays and Lesbians Lawrence v. Tribe (2003)-Privacy in the bed room Defense of marriage Act- Passed during Clinton's presidency. Barring same sex marital benefits under federal law. Also allowed states to not have to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. Overturned in 2014 65 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Other Struggles for Equality Gays and Lesbians Obergefell v. Hodges (2015 ) same sex in 50 states Concerns about religious freedom/expression vs. discrimination Flower, pizza. Provide to gay customers but not for a wedding. 66 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Supreme Court Decision on Same-Sex Marriage Click picture to view video 67 Copyright ©2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz