Soloviov Ye. V.,
Postgraduate student of NAPA, Kyiv
An extendedabstract of a paperon the subject of:
INTERNALLY FORCED MIGRATION AS AN OBJECT
OF STATE REGULATION
Problem setting. In modern conditions of growth of socio-economic, public
and political and military tension sine astern Ukraine, therewereregistered1684815
of internally displaced persons, who were forced to migrate from the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, as well as the Donetsk and Lugansk regions
because of the temporary occupation of the territory of Ukraine and conducting of
anti-terrorist operations. The immensity of forced internal migration, due to the
occupation of some territories of Ukraine urgently needs creation and adequate
scientifically grounded approach to the definition of internal forced migration as an
object of state regulation.
Recent research and publications analysis. The basis of the theoretical
understanding of internal forced migration were formed with scientific conclusions
about the nature of migration and its types, which are formed in the works of
N. P. Bortnik, V. G. Kravchenko, M. M. Yarmystoho and others. However, there
were used the achievements of state administration science about determination of
object’s features of state regulation. In particular, these are works of such scientists
as: D. M. Balanyuk, T.V. Zhvania, Y. V. Kovbasyuk, V. I. Nadraga.
Object of the paper is accentuation of the signs of forced internal migration
that mediate the necessity of state regulation and the peculiarities of its
implementation.
Paper main body. Unlike previous eras, modern migration is not subjected
to authoritarian forms of influence; it requires a control system that would receive
form of independent social institution that can solve fundamentally new problems
in new ways. The attempts of state regulation of migration do not give the expected
results. Migration policies of the countries are determined by the fragmentarily,
resource insecurity, lack of theoretical elaboration.
To avoid controversy, the term "migration" in the scientific analysis
necessarily quires characteristics of the adjective: seasonal, Pendulum, temporary,
permanent, economical, voluntary, forced and so on. Internal and forced character
of migration specifies the underlying social phenomenon as follows: internal
migration is defined as any form of movement of persons within the state, which is
due to certain reasons and aimed at achieving specific goals. In most cases, internal
migration is the result of economic development, urbanization, poverty reduction,
etc. [2, p. 143]. Internal migration depending on incentive factors can be classified
as: voluntary and involuntary; forced internal migration can be considered as a
necessary movement of the person within the state, which leads to a change of
person’s legal status under the law and on the basis of administrative enforcement
act and change of residence. Forced internal migration is mediated through
military, political events, persecution on the grounds of religion or ethnicity,
violence committed against them or their families.
Inside forced migration as an object of state administration can be defined as
a form of public relations to social mobility within the country, whose members
change their place of residence, regardless of their own will, that influence son
their legal status.
On the other hand, these relationships differ from stage of movement, which
mediates different mechanisms of their regulation. Based on a handling as
characteristics, which is necessary for the object of government, singling out the
type of government regulation of forced internal migration has specific
characteristics.
To qualify forced internal migration as the object of management and
development of the policies, it is necessary to:
1) identify characteristics that indicate features of migration flows:
sustainability,
intensity,
direction,
professional, social characteristics);
composition (for
example,
sex,
age,
2) identify the main factors that affect the ability to adaptation of internally
displaced persons, especially the placement of migrators on the territory of the
settlement.
Conclusions of the research. In summary, it can be argued that the
mechanisms and directions of state regulation of forced internal migration vary
depending on the stage of moving on: those that must be made before the moment
of becoming internally displaced persons; those that must be made after the entry
of such status. Because of the specific characteristics of the internal forced
migration, selection of the mechanisms of state regulation must also be based on
the theoretical justification of changes in the economy, politics, social and cultural
relations, which are mediated by the processes of forced migration.