Minute Book 84
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK, ALABAMA
JULY 30,2012
The City Council of the City of Mountain Brook met in a special public session in the temporary City
Hall at 5:00 p.m. on Monday, the 30th day of July, 2012. The President of the City Council called the meeting
to order and the roll was called with the following results:
Present:
Virginia C. Smith, Council President
Jack D. Carl
Amy G. Carter
William S. Pritchard, I11
Lawrence T. Oden, Mayor
Absent:
Jesse S. Vogtle, Jr., Council President Pro Tempore
Also present were City Attorney Whit Colvin, City Manager Sam Gaston, and City Clerk Steven
Boone.
The Council President stated that a quorum was present and that the meeting was open for the
transaction of business.
1.
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION (NO. 2012-117) AWARDING THE BID TO STONE
ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS AT THE
INTERSECTION OF BEECHWOOD ROAD AND OVERBROOK ROAD (EXHIBIT 1,
APPENDIX 1)
The President introduced the resolution in writing and invited questions and comments. There being
none, Council member Pritchard entered a motion that the City Council adopt the resolution awarding the bid
to Stone Electric Company, Inc. The motion was seconded by Council member Carl. Then, upon the
question being put and the roll called, the vote was recorded as follows:
Ayes:
Virginia C. Smith, Council President
Jack D. Carl
Amy G . Carter
William S. Pritchard, I11
Nays:
None
Council President Smith thereupon declared that said motion passed by a vote of 4 - 4 and as evidence
thereof, she signed the resolution (No. 2012-1 17).
2.
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION (NO. 2012-116) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN 1) THE CITY AND 2) EVSON, INC. AND
DANIEL REALTY COMPANY, LLC WITH RESPECT TO THE LANE PARKE PROJECT
(EXHIBIT 2, APPENDIX 2)
Council President Smith introduced the resolution in writing and called on Council member Pritchard
to describe the proposed development agreement.
July 30,2012
1028
Minute Book 84
Council member Pritchard:
Similar to past projects that have involved significant capital investment, the City has negotiated
diligently with the developers on the terms of a development agreement with respect to the Lane
Parke project.
Revenue projections have been studied and an independent consultant (Arthur and Suzanna
Allaway) engaged to evaluate the developers' marketing plan and the revenue potential of the
development.
The construction of this development is projected to cost up to $120 million (not counting the
land value) which includes a sizable investment ($16+ million) in public infrastructure (see
Exhibit B or the proposed development agreement).
The proposed agreement provides for the developer to receive from the City up to $14 million
within 20-year period which commences upon the opening of the project.
The $14 million involves two components:
1) $4 million representing reimbursement of the developers' construction and improvements
of certain public streets including Lane Park Road ($1 million), Culver Road ($500,000), as well
as the construction of a new road that has been referred to throughout this project as Jemison Lane
($2.5 million) which will connect Lane Park Road to Montevallo Road. Such specified roads will
be dedicated to the City as public streets. The $4 million is payable in installments as work
progresses on these roads.
2) $10 million revenue sharing arrangement payable from the [new] taxes generated from the
development. It is structured as a riskless financial commitment by the City much like previous
projects (Cahaba Village, Publix, and Piggly Wiggly on River Run Drive). The three primary
differences between this agreement and the prior development agreements include: 1) the ad
valorem taxes payable to the Mountain Brook Board of Education are excluded from the revenue
sharing formula, 2) the amount of the current taxes generated are not included in the revenue
sharing formula and have been indexed with a modest increase through 2039 as outlined in
Exhibit D of the agreement, and 3) the City retains all building permit fees and sales tax on
construction materials which are collectively estimated to be as much as $1.5 million.
The $10 million revenue sharing arrangement will be based on the amount of sales and ad
valorem taxes over the scheduled baseline amounts for each year. The developer shall receive
90% of such excesses above the baseline amount. If the sales taxes shared in any given year
exceed $1 million, the revenue sharing percentage shall be 75% of such excess. There is no
baseline for the lodging taxes so they will be shared 90:lO until the $10 million obligation is
satisfied.
Once the $10 million is satisfied, the City retains all taxes generated by the development.
It is projected that the $10 million obligation will be satisfied in 7 to 10 years once the new
income stream commences.
The last component of the development agreement is that the developer has the opportunity to use
any or all the stored dirt at the Birmingham Zoo deposited by the City in conjunction with the
now completed Watkins Branch Flood Hazard Mitigation Project. It is the City's hope that the
developer will use all of said dirt so the City does not have to deal with the removal of any
remaining dirt.
The $14 million commitment is a sizable amount. To put it in perspective, the $14 million
commitment is less than 112 of the monetary amount of the Cahaba Village commitment as
compared to the total project cost.
The City's CFO has reviewed the projected cash flow and conservatively estimates that the Board
of Education should receive from between $800,000 to $1 million annually in new ad valorem
taxes which will be realized as the various phases are completed and assessed by the Tax
Assessor. The City is projected to receive new lodging and sales taxes of at least $1 million
annually and maybe as much as $2 million annually once the $10 million obligation is satisfied.
Doug Neal, Vice President of Daniel Realty Company, LLC: Using a PowerPointg, presentation, Mr.
Neal briefly reviewed the scale, scope and phasing of the project (as previously presented in greater detail
during the course of the rezoning hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council).
Council president Smith asked Mr. Neal to discuss in general the recruitment of prospective tenants,
especially existing tenants.
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Mr. Neal:
Existing tenants are being given the opportunity to relocate to the new space.
Some of the existing tenants have expressed interest in relocating.
It is expected that many of the current tenants will remain in the development.
Council member Pritchard asked whether the developer had secured any letters of intent from
prospective tenants.
Mr. Neal:
Without disclosing any names (due to confidentiality), there are three or four letters of intent inhand.
Council president Smith:
The Village Design Review Committee has expressed some concern about some of the interior
spaces not being constructed with the same quality of materials as the more prominent spaces.
Pat Henry, Vice President of Daniel Realty Company, LLC:
The development team is working through budget issues and will be working with the Village
Design Review Committee to determine the appropriate materials in keeping with the [approved]
pattern book.
Council member Pritchard asked whether the terms negotiated in the development agreement are
absolutely critical to this project moving forward.
Council member Carter clarified the question by asking whether the financing would be impossible to
obtain or just very difficult to obtain without the City's participation by way of revenue sharing as provided in
the proposed development agreement.
Charlie Tickle, Vice President of Daniel Realty Company, LLC:
Responded that financing this project would be very difficult to obtain and may in fact be
impossible without the City's participation.
Council member Carter asked what progress has been made with respect to the recruitment of new
tenants.
Mr. Neal:
Negotiations are well underway in the recruitment of new restaurants and boutique retailers (many
of which will be new to this market).
Expects that such negotiations will be facilitated upon the securing of the [proposed] development
agreement.
With respect to new tenants, negotiations will intensify once the apartment phase winds down and
efforts shift to the phase 1 retail phase.
It is expected that the initial retail phase will be close to 100% leased before construction and the
second phase will be close to 50% leased before construction.
Before opening the floor to the audience, Mayor Oden wished to emphasize that the development
agreement obligation will be paid with "new" money to the City.
Council member Pritchard:
Put another way, the developer will be paid from money "earned" by the City from the
development . Furthermore, if the obligation is not satisfied within the prescribed 120-year] time
period, the developers do not get paid for the [unpaid] balance just as was the case with past
development agreements.
With respect to the prior development agreements [Publix, Piggly Wiggly, and Cahaba Village],
all obligations have been (or will be satisfied) in much less time than initially projected.
J:\Minutes & Agendas\Council\2012\20120730Minutes.doc
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
1030
Council member Carl:
Additionally, the $4 million being paid to the developer is less than the actual construction costs
of such improvements and the roads will be dedicated to the City upon their completion.
Alan Rushton, former Mayor of the City:
Has the City entered into any prior, informal agreements with the developer with respect to this
"gift"?
If not approved, the City will be in violation of any informal agreement with the developer?
This obligation represents a 12% investment in this project. Many "great" projects have failed.
Considers this investment to be too great of a gamble for the City to undertake.
Believes that such incentives should only be used to prevent a development from moving its
project to some other city. In this case, the developers are not going to build anywhere but here.
If the development cannot proceed without this $14 million investment, then it probably should
not be pursued in the first place.
Believes that in many instances where a developer has to have and incentive, it seems they find a
way to move forward if such incentives are denied.
Roads and sidewalks are generally the responsibility of the developer. These costs should not be
paid by the City. If built to Mountain Brook standards, the City can assume maintenance once
constructed.
Thinks the City will be setting a precedent if this agreement is authorized.
Mr. Pritchard responded:
That there are no prior agreements between the City and developer. The proposed development
agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties since the rezoning.
Of the $14 million incentive, $10 million is without risk as it will be paid from the tax earnings
derived from the development.
Walter Scott of 3632 Montevallo Road:
Is the $4 million at risk.
Is the parking deck going to be public?
Is not opposed to this agreement and wants to know whether other developments may qualify for
similar incentives.
Mr. Pritchard responded:
There is some risk, however, the net cost will be approximately $2.5 million taking into account
the permit fees and sales taxes to be received as a result of the construction and improvements of
the roads.
The parking deck will be for public parking but it will not be transferred to the City. None of the
$14 million is dedicated to the parking deck.
Council president Smith:
If the Scott's have a development proposal that will generate a lot more tax revenue for the City,
the City wants to hear about it and will consider incentives.
Council member Carl:
The City is interested in developments that result in new jobs, new parking, and new tax revenue
for the City.
Tracy Rasco of 3504 Old Leeds Crest:
Does not understand how the City will receive sales tax dollars on construction materials.
Does the developer have the balance of the money needed to complete this project including
possible construction cost overruns, or will they be back looking for more money later from the
City?
Steven Boone, Finance Director:
Sales taxes are payable for materials delivered in the City (i.e., they do not have to be purchased
in the City).
J:\Minutes & Agendas\Council\2012\20120730Minutes.doc
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
103 1
Additionally, all contractors will be required to purchase construction permits for all work on this
project.
Council member Pritchard:
There will be no more tax revenue (not covered in the proposed development agreement) shared
with the developer on this project.
Council member Carl:
The City anticipated that the developer would ask for some incentives on the first Lane Parke plan
approved by the City but is not sure what terms would have been negotiated.
Also of note, the City's $5million Cahaba Village revenue sharing obligation amounted to 25%
of the capital investment made by the developer.
John Williamson of 6 Montrose Circle:
What protection is available to the City if the project stalls?
What about the lost revenue during the construction period?
What about the potential eye sore if the project is only partially completed?
If anything we have seen in the last five years, there is nothing about real estate that is "riskless".
Council member Pritchard:
The agreement stipulates that 25% of the buildings must be constructed before any part of the $4
million is released.
Council member Carl:
Western and the other tenants will not be affected during phase 1 of the construction. The tenants
will move into new (phase 1 retail) space once completed. Afterward, the existing mall will be
razed and the phase 2 retail will commence.
Regarding the roads, payments will be made in installments after work is performed.
Suzanne Thomas of Simms Avenue:
Can some of the permit fees and sales tax be shifted to the schools so they can get immediate
benefit from this development?
Council member Carl:
The short answer is 'no' in that those revenues will be used by the City to offset its $4 million
portion of the $14 million development agreement obligation.
The school system never receives any portion of those types of revenues.
Council member Smith:
The schools will start collecting new ad valorem taxes once the various phases are completed and
assessed by the Jefferson County Tax Assessor.
School officials were asked in advance whether they wanted to participate in the revenue sharing
arrangement and they stated that they preferred to collect all of their ad valorem taxes as earned.
Council member Pritchard:
In one of the previous development agreements, a portion of the educational ad valorem taxes
were abated.
That is not the case in this development agreement. If it were, the City's incremental tax
collections would be significantly higher during the period that the development agreement
obligation is being satisfied.
Jim White of 556 Olde English Lane:
Has asked before in prior public meetings whether a market study has been performed.
Wants to know what analysis exists as to all of these tax projections and whether this project is
feasible.
J:\Minutes & Agendas\Council\2012\20120730Minutes.doc
July 30,2012
1032
Minute Book 84
He has reviewed the Allaway report and it is merely a research project that outlines what a
successful development might look like expressed in terms of sales per square foot.
There is only one outside source of information ("Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers")
referred to in the Allaway report regarding potential lease rates.
A true market study defines the market area, analyzes demographic data, analyzes the impact of
area competition, and the potential market share of the proposed development.
The Allaway study appears to lack personal interviews with prospective tenants.
The conclusions expressed in the Allaway study appears to be tentative and not a professional
opinion about what revenues this development is likely to achieve.
Teri Adams of 2505 Montevallo Road:
Traffic is already difficult in this area and is concerned about the impact of this development on
traffic flow.
With a lack of visibility and traffic congestion, wonders how a development of this size can be
successful.
Has there been a true traffic count and study of this area?
Council president Smith:
A traffic study was conducted by Skipper Consulting and submitted along with the PUD
application.
The City also engaged a traffic consultant to review the Skipper report and traffic issues with
respect to the development.
Wally Evans of 2500 Watkins Road:
Generally supports the idea of redeveloping this area.
Is not concerned with the City reimbursing the developer for constructing City assets.
Is confused about what assets the City is getting for the $10 million portion of the agreement.
Does not see the purpose of the government to be a venture capitalist.
Wants to know what can be done by the City for the long time businesses of the City.
Views this agreement as the City subsidizing the competition of the existing businesses.
Does not think the City should subsidize private investment.
Council member Pritchard:
The City is not getting ownership in any other assets besides the specified roads.
The City is getting access to the public improvements without taking ownership thereof.
Council president Smith:
Businesses, big and small, are encouraged to come to the City if they have development plans that
have the potential to grow the City's tax base.
Ann Sanders of 4616 Pine Mountain Road, owner of Mountain Brook Plaza, Hampton Inn and
Wendy's on Highway 280:
When they tore down Rossi's and came to the City with its redevelopment plan, which included
the back access road into the center, the City fought them all the way.
The City cost them thousands of dollars to develop their property.
They built their own road and continue to maintain it.
More retail is welcome in Mountain Brook but objects to the City opening its checkbook for this
project considering how it fought the redevelopment of Mountain Brook Plaza.
Sam Gaston, City Manager:
Reminded Ms. Sanders that the problems she encountered involved a different group of elected
officials and city attorney.
The attitude (and actions) of the City has changed since her redevelopment.
Mary Alice Carmichael of 2857 Canterbury Road
Stated that she is a landlord in the village.
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
1033
If the City is going to give this kind of incentive to this developer, is there not some kind of tax
break the City can give to the existing tenants.
Her tenants are suffering.
She has had to reduce rents to keep her tenants due to their struggles.
Elna Brendel of 23 17 Lane Park Road:
Is bothered that some of the public improvements are occurring outside of Mountain Brook in
Birmingham and wants to know how that can happen.
Mr. Henry:
All improvements will occur within the existing right-of-way (there will be no taking of any rightof-way).
The developer will obtain the requisite approvals from Birmingham before making any
improvements.
With respect to the Mountain Brook portion of the development, all buildings will be setback
from the right-of-way pursuant to existing building codes.
Elberta Reed:
Will any development occur within the Mountain Brook right-of-way?
Will there be sidewalks along Lane Park Road?
Who monitors flood control in the villages.
Is concerned about flooding.
Is not satisfied that the City has adequately addressed flooding.
Mr. Henry:
The Lane Park Road improvements are currently being designed. All improvements thereto will
be subject to review and approval by the City of Birmingham
With respect to the Mountain Brook portion of the development, all buildings will be setback
from the right-of-way pursuant to existing building codes and approved development plan.
There will be sidewalks along Lane Park Road.
Mr. Gaston:
The Public Works department keeps the stream beds clear for vegetation and sand bars.
Mr. Rushton:
Regarding the $10 million, if the project does well, questions that it will cost the City nothing.
Council member Pritchard:
The City will collect taxes from the businesses in the development. To the extent that such taxes
exceed the defined tax base, the City will share the excess in accordance with the percentages
outlined in the development agreement.
If the obligation is not satisfied within the prescribed time period (20 years), the developer
receives no more shared tax revenue.
Tracy Rasco of 3504 Old Leeds Crest:
If the City can afford to give this tax money away, can the residents get a guaranty that the City
will not increase property taxes.
Understands that a bedroornlresidential community like Mountain Brook cannot continue to serve
the community without growing its tax base.
Questions whether this type of arrangement is the best way to grow the tax base.
Council member Pritchard:
The City does not have any control or influence over property valuations.
Minute Book 84
1034
Regarding the millage (or tax) rate, if the City decided additional property taxes were needed, it
could call for a referendum and the voting public would decide whether or not to increase its ad
valorem taxes.
One of the reasons the City considers these types of development projects is so that the City can
increase its tax base and not seek additional taxes from the residents.
Were it not for the Publix, Piggly Wiggly, and Cahaba Village projects, the City could not have
balanced its budget without reducing its workforce [during and after the recent recession].
Fay Clark of 29 15 Canterbury Road:
Did the developer or any of its agents suggest that these types of incentives would be necessary
before the rezoning and development plan were approved.
Council member Pritchard:
The City engaged in talks with the Evans' four years ago when they asked the City to entertain
establishing a business improvement district for the purpose of issuing municipal debt to make
this project possible. That plan went nowhere because it was not considered in the best interest of
the City.
There have ongoing discussions over the past four years about this development.
The details of this agreement were not formalized until after the rezoning and development plan
were approved.
Elna Brendel:
How can the developer deed Lane Park Road to the City if it is located in Birmingham.
Council member Carl:
The developers cannot dedicate Lane Park Road to the City of Mountain Brook.
John Williamson:
Does it worry anyone on the Council that the developers' cannot obtain private funding.
Council member Carl:
It appears that the development will be constructed with up to $1 10 million of private funding.
Walter Scott of 3632 Montevallo Road:
Is proud of the City Council in attacking this issue head-on.
Is in favor of this agreement.
Prior generations have not been proactive in developing this community as evidenced by
numerous missed opportunities (e.g., Brookwood Village, The Summit, and Liberty Park).
If the Council thinks this is the best solution, then he is in favor.
Hopes the City Council will consider other similar development opportunities.
Plans to come see the Council about his development plans.
Lucy Bynum of 2841 Montevallo Road:
Questions whether there is a better way notices of important Council meetings can be sent to the
public.
Attended most meetings about this development and does not recall ever hearing about the
necessity for an incentive package to make this development happen.
Council member Pritchard:
The City always expected to be involved in a development agreement on a project of this size.
There was never any reason to discuss a development agreement until the details of the
development and rezoning were resolved.
Incentives for this project have come up routinely over the past four years.
Business and developers have come to expect incentives for major developments.
Council president Smith stated that she thinks that the issue of a development agreement was brought
up in a previous meeting.
J:\Minutes & Agendas\CouncilUO12~0120730
Minutes.doc
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
1035
Mayor Oden emphasized that the City is not giving the developer any money until the development
generates new tax money for the City. The only investment at risk is the $2.5 million (+I-)net cash paid for
the specified streets.
Fay Clark of 291 5 Canterbury Road:
Wants to hear a response from the Council about Mr. White's concerns about the Allaway study.
Council president Smith:
Believes that the members of the City Council are not as concerned about the Allaway study as
Mr. White.
Council member Pritchard:
The Allaways have previously performed studies for the City and their work has been found to be
conservative and beneficial to the City in its deliberations.
Once of their first projects for the City was 10 years ago and involved a community-wide survey
which was the precursor to the Publix and Piggly Wiggly developments.
Rob Walker, member of the Village Design Review Committee (VDR):
To elaborate on President Smith's earlier comments, the Village Design Review Committee is
working closely with the developers regarding the construction materials to be used throughout
the development.
The VDR has seen representations of two buildings and it is their understanding that equal
consideration will be given to each of the buildings within the development-not just the
prominent buildings.
Mr. Neal:
Drawings and representations of each of the buildings will be presented to the VDR for
consideration and discussion.
As the project evolves, the same process will be followed.
There being no further questions or comments, Council member Pritchard entered a motion that the
City Council adopt the resolution authorizing the execution of the development agreement. The motion was
seconded by Council member Carl. Then, upon the question being put and the roll called, the vote was
recorded as follows:
Ayes:
Virginia C. Smith, Council President
Jack D. Carl
Amy G. Carter
William S. Pritchard, 111
Nays:
None
Council President Smith thereupon declared that said motion passed by a vote of 4 - 4 and as evidence
thereof, she signed the resolution (No. 20 12-1 16).
3.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Council President Smith announced that the next meeting of the Mountain Brook City Council will be
held on Monday, August 13,2012 at 7 p.m. at the temporary City Hall located at 3928 Montclair Road, Suite
230, Mountain Brook, Alabama 35213. Please visit the City's web site (www.mtnbrook.org) for more
information.
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, it was moved and seconded that the
meeting be adjourned. Motion carried.
Steven Boone, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-117
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mountain Brook, Alabama, that the City
Council hereby awards the bid in the amount of $5 1,405 to Stone Electric Company for the purchase and
installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Overbrook Road and Beechwood Road having been
determined to have submitted the lowest and best bid and determined to be in compliance with the bid
specifications; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mountain Brook, Alabama that
either the Mayor or City Manager are hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the City, to execute
a contract andlor such other documents that may be determined necessary related thereto subject to review and
approval by the City Attorney.
[APPENDIX 11
CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK, ALABAMA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-116
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mountain Brook, Alabama ("the City Council"), has been
asked to consider and approve a development agreement ("Agreement") with Evson, Inc., an Alabama
corporation, and Daniel Realty Company, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company (hereinafter collectively
referred to as the "Company"), which Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A, made a part hereof, and
incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, City Council, on July 19,2012, authorized and directed the City Clerk to publish Legal
Notice of Action Proposed to be Taken by the City of Mountain Brook, Alabama with regard to a
Development Agreement, pursuant to and in conformity with Amendment 772 to the Constitution of Alabama
(1901) (Article 94.01 of the Recompiled Constitution of Alabama); and
WHEREAS, such Notice, attached hereto as Exhibit B, was published in the Birmingham News, the
newspaper having the largest circulation in the City of Mountain Brook, on July 22,2012, which publication
was at least seven days prior to the date of the meeting at which this Resolution is being considered; and
WHEREAS, such Notice further invited members of the public to attend the meeting and submit
comments regarding the actions the City Council is considering with respect to the transactions and
agreements described in the Notice; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its meeting on the present date, offered members of the public the
opportunity to comment on the matters set forth in the Notice and those comments have been considered by the
City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOUNTAIN BROOK, ALABAMA, as follows:
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
1037
1.
That the Development Agreement between the City of Mountain Brook and Evson, Inc. and
Daniel Realty Company, LLC, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, shall be and is hereby
approved.
2.
That the Mayor of the City of Mountain Brook shall be and hereby is authorized to execute
and enter into a Development Agreement with Evson, Inc. and Daniel Realty Company, LLC, in substantial
conformity with the Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. and deliver the
Agreement set forth in this Resolution to the other parties to the Agreement or to their representatives.
3.
That the Mayor shall further be authorized to make such corrections or revisions to the text or
form of the Agreement as necessary prior to such execution, provided that any such correction or revision shall
not alter the material terms of the Agreement.
4.
That, after due consideration, the City Council finds and determines that the expenditure of
public funds for the purposes and in the manner specified in the Agreement, and the execution of the
Agreement approved in this Resolution serve valid and sufficient public purposes, notwithstanding any
individual benefit accruing to Evson, Inc., Daniel Realty Company, LLC, or any other private entity or entities.
5.
That the public benefits to the City of Mountain Brook resulting from the Agreement and
transactions hereby approved include promotion of local, economic and commercial development and the
stimulation of the local economy; revitalization of a significant portion of Mountain Brook Village; increasing
employment opportunities in the City; increasing the City's sales tax base by attracting high quality tenants;
promoting the location, expansion, and retention of commercial enterprises in Mountain Brook Village;
preserving and improving the aesthetic quality of commercial development in Mountain Brook Village;
expansion of and enhancement to the public street network used by its residents; installation of road
improvements designed to improve traffic flow and increase safety; extension of sidewalks and pedestrian
ways throughout the property and improved connections thereof; construction of stormwater improvements;
development of usable green space; addition of public parking; and the generation of significant revenues for
the City and for its public schools; all of which inure to the economic health and public benefit of the City.
6.
That any exchange of consideration resulting from the Development Agreement herein
approved was fully negotiated between the parties to it and the City Council specifically finds and concludes
that such consideration is based upon and equal to the fair market value of the interests being acquired.
[APPENDIX 21
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
our work is dependent upon or must be undertaken in conjunction with the work of others, such work shall be so performed
and completed as to permit us to perform our work hereunder in a
normal uninterrupted single shift operation.
Bid: bverbmok Road at &c*lwood Road T n 5 c Signalizalianfor thS City ofMomuin
Bmok
O p e d Monday. July 16.2012 $2:00 p.m. at Mountain B d City Hall
Unless a time for the performance of our work is specified, we
shall undertake it in the course of our normal optrating schedule.
We shall not be liable for any failure to undertake or complete
the work for causes beyond our control, including but not limited
to fire, flood or other casualty; labor disputes or other
disagreements; and accidents or other mishaps, whether affecting
this work or other operations in which we are involved,
directly or indirectly.
Bid WU:
Stone & SON Elechic
Stone Elabic Compny
568.888
151,405
It is further understood that we shall not be responsible for
any damage to or deterioration of any of our work, whether
completed or in process, resulting from any cause beyond our
control, including but not limited to failure of subgrade or
failure of inadequacy of any labor or materials not furnished and
installed by us, whether or not such failure or inadequacy was or
could have been known at the time of our work was undertaken. You
agree that the proper jurisdiction and venue for any lawsuit
concerning this contract is Jefferson County , Alabama, and you
waive any right to jurisdiction and venue in any other place.
You further agree to indemnify us and protect us and save us
hannless from any and all loss, damages, costs, expenses and
attorney's fees suffered or incurred on account of your breach of
any obligations and covenants of this contract.
Stone Electric Co.,
Inc. shall comply with Alabama's
immigration law, Act 2011-535 (also known as HB56 or the BeasonH a m o n Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act). By signing
this Contract agreement, Stone Electric Co., Inc. affirm for the
duration of the agreement, that we will not violate federal
immigration law or knowingly employ, hire for employment, or
continue to employ an unauthorized alien within the state of
Alabama.
r(
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto executed this Agreunent
under seal, the date and year first above written.
CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK
WNER
STONE ELECTRIC CO. INC.
ONTRACTOR
Paula G. Wo
a
8
4
Pres dent
Federal Identification No
63-0362585
# S&C STONE ELECTRIC CO., INC.
w
4824 5TH AVENUE SO.
BIRMINGHAM.AL 35222
PHONE (205) 824313
FAX (205)5924315
w.s1wEl&iC.com
DATE: July 20, 2012
ADDFNDUM
TO: City of Mountain Brooknd
3928 Montclair Road, 2 Floor
Mountain Brook, AL 35213
ATTN:
Statement ofCompliance with Alabama Code Section 31-13-0.
By oignlng this contract,the wntracting parties affirm,
for the duration of
Sam S. Gaston. Purchasing Agent
the agreement, that they wiil not violate federal immigration law or knowlngiy
CONTRACT
employ, hire foremployment, or continue lo employ an unautllo~edalien within
Stone Electric Co., Inc., hereinafter called the Contractor,
offers to furnish all labor, materials and equipment required for
the ~erformanceof the followina described work in connection
with' traffic signalization for &orbrook Road at 8.ochxood Road
in Mountain c rook, Nabwhich property is owned by
Mountrin Brook.
the State ofAlabama. Furthermore,a contracting party found to be in vlolatlon of
this provision shall be deemed in breach of the agreement and shell be
rerponslbbforall damages resulting Ulerefm.
DBSCRSPTIOPI OF WORK AND PRICE:
-
Traffic Sigcalm for Ovrrbmok R o d at -chwood
of Mout8in Brook, AL.
Road in th. City
Tot81 A P O M t of Contract
$51,405.00
Printed Name of Contractor
Tile
AND CONDITIONS
Any deviations from the specifications or modification of the
terms of this contract and any extra or incidental work, or
reductions in work, shall be set forth in writing and signed by
both parties prior to the making of such change. Contractor will
be compensated for any increase in costs caused, on the basis of
the cost of the increase plus ten percent 110)) profit. If a time
is set for the performance of the work, and if, in our sole
judgment, such change will increase the time necessary for the
performance of our work, we will be granted a reasonable extension
of time.
We shall provide and pay for Worker's Compensation Insurance
covering our employees and Public Liability and Property DamInsurance protecting ourselves.
We will also assume
%ponsibility
for the collection and payment of Social Security
and State Unemployment Taxes applicable to our employees.
We shall be provided with suitable access to the work area.
*INDUSTRIU
*COWERCUL
EST. 1945
*T~UFFIC
If
Signature ofContractor
Date
Stone Elemic Co. Inc.
Name of Business Enttty
A 12-1 17
*FIBER OPTIC
J:\Minutes& Agendas\Council\2012\20120730
Minutes.doc
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
l H E CITY OR M O W A M BROOK AND
TIfU ADDENDUM (YhrfthuAddmdum")
tho pinslpll.prormcnt baatho Clty of 79
Moluuln Brook, A h h m ("he C i m and S m e Electric Ca, Inc. ("he Contnctol") dued 1uIy;d.
2012.
T b b Addudom b a pad of the p r l d p l y w m m t , but s u p m r d u and com[rd.smy
. to (Lc extent
~
sonllietln; or L w m b u n t t e r m or pmvlrloar la Ibc prlnclpal y m m e n t , p
purport d t h r to (a) confer g m t c r r i g h u or
k Contmslor 1h.n a n p r m l d d b d n o r Mdar OthanNc a p p l h b b Ll,or to@)
n m d l a om t
m d u q rut~+cI,or eUmlrute rlgbu or r a a d l w t&twnld be avdhble to tb. CIty underotbarwb.
appliubk Lw. The addendum abaII mmaln In bU lorn and cKrrt with m w t to .nv amendment
.r&.lon, o r . ~ ~ p b m e nof
t o r to Ibe p r b d p l y m m e n t , w h t h e c or not &ratly a;kmowl*ed
or Inmrponted t h e d n . No a p n 2 cmplqee, o r rcpmsentatln of tho Clty b aathorlocd to mlvc.
mod&, oralupend tbe openuon of the Addendom or any of lU tar- o r ~ r a Y o a without
r
L C
O
~
u p m i approid or the &nntain B ~ O cf*
pnw.
~
~
Iho coallictlng or Inconrirtrnt t e r m or p r o d -
I.
2.
Prornm prior to pafuming MYwh or continuingto @nn any m p l q mhand r h l t
m i n ramlied thmughout tho mtim c a m e of iu ~
~
~ stc.shto, iu
fldavit thc GVuify Profor Employment VaVlution ud McmomAm of Undamnding
and such otha dosunnntuion u the Boud m y requin to m f u m Conmslots cnmIlment in tho
EVmfy Pro-.
Contnstorqma n a to how&& b l h any of i u ~ ~ b c c n t n r t oor
n ,.ny
otba puty with whom it hu a conmet, to employ in the Sum ofAlsbuna my illcplor
undosummtcd d i m 10 @nu any wat in m m t i m with tho Project, md rh*l include in d l
lfConvrror m l v a l m n l
of at contnslr a provision submrmally s ~ t thiso
of
d i .................................
h analin thc S u m of Alnbunr it will
knowkdu ofthe uruuthodd
-- mhu
~
-..
.
.one
..~..
~
remove &at e m p l o p hum the p m j w jobits or -iau
ofthe City and dull somply with the
Immifllon Reform ud Control Act of 1916, u vnsdcd by (b.I m m i ~ o AQ
n of i990, and
the Buron-Hunmon Alabuna Tupayer and C i t i m Psto*ion Act Contutor J v l l nquk
each of iu wbsonmcton, or h e r p l i u with whom It hu a conma, t o r t in asimilv f v b h
IfCcnmcmr violatu any term ofrhi. pmvl&m.thia
A m a t will be a r b j a t o i m m d i
tanimtion by the City. To the Tulla d e n t p ~ l i f l C dby law, ContnMr shell &fad,
indemnifyand hold humks W City rium any and all 10% conqurmi.l dunrp*e x p n n
(including, but not limited to, 8Mnry+ forr).dsim%r u b , Iifi~litio,fin- p11116n, and any
othcrcoau d i n g out of or in any way related to ConmCmh hilure to fulfill lD obliutiont
contained in thlt p m y p h .
j.*
DATED ~ # & y ofluly. 2012.
D./kWom~. For p r p o u s of this Addendum, thc t a n s below have the followir@muninp:
Stoma Eicar(c Ca,. lffi
A.
"The C W refen to and i n c l u k the C'i of Mounuin Bmok, AIaand agmcia.
WIIIIiNent dcpurmcnl* M,
B.
"The (rhh) A p r v n r " ref- to ths prinslpl srmmu, agmmmt, pmpoul, qumlion.
a othrr dosumat th.rar forth the buk Dmuand m d l t i m undu which thc
Conburor h ny.@to pmvido A d h . a mimto thocity, indudinp the
therefor.
pymcnt or other m i d r n t i o n to ba pmvided by h e City in &ngo
C.
"n*ConiracW"refmtoths pcmhfim,or aher l e p l entity that entm into m
a g m c n t with the City lo provide pod&mllcrial4 or rcrvlcuto the City, dincluda
vendon and wppliar pmvidiip A muerillr. and r n l c o r to the Clty with a withold
u v d u IheCon-snndon
rmpplim. and rmbsonmsmn.
a fomul so-
and lu
By:
-
MUm,Iom; MdI.uOm;Mvm,ueDhput Irrduriom. lh City
lo u b i i t a dltoIn alumuo ditmtc moIuIion IADR) ifubih.lion or ADR is m u M bv thc
tu:
or
plnuit ofothu kpt m e d t u , G t m ~ y t o t h eo l ~ n t ( ~ j t righu
h e md m i t u a n ~ ~ a under
b~e
such wb~mtionNIU or
do not afford UY COnlllCm(m t c r rehd(e+. attorney'$ foa.
dumas. em.) than -Id
ba avulabk unhr dm+lmlmble hw 12) $hav a u a fa the
ublUjron or mcdlulon prrrccd8~u m I&~oun;~labun%
jthe
of such
pmcscdmy (mncludm'Uw fees of thc u b w a meduqor) am dmvldod evenly bethc
mi6 oii
AUoruey'r Feu;COW Cari;Ulrpllon B q u ~ a
The City hall no1 be Iubk for altorq's
fee, coua sorts litigationa p n r e * and like J l l r p u uKpt dto the extent rmch feu, w,
3.
and J l l r p u would be iueaed winat the City unda appliuble law in the abrms, of any
wnmaubl p i < mimpains or bulplng liability thcdw.
4.
lorrPuy"n1 C h m PUC Iniuur. The City d u l l rot be l i i l o for any lam p m t
c h u m interat, or f e u on any delinquentbill for&,
nuurhl, or m l s u at a m u h l d u
th.n hrothirds of one percent per month (eight &nt p c r m m ) . but bilb mdcd to t
liCity
shall not ba conaidered doliucnt my u r l i a h n t h i i (30) dayr after mditionof a ormpIscc
md assunle bill by the Conmo(.r
C a n t a t d bills shell not be s u b i d lo hIe mmentchupcr
pending raolvtiondthedhpuu.
..
J.
ImdrmlYlprHm; ~ d d ~ m m i m
~ei-4
:
wdw; w u a n r of a w e w e.
he
City shdl not and d o u n a Indemni*, hold h k s , or rrlcase the Conmuor or m y 0thpnoh firm or leg1 enthy f a , hm, or with
to any cIIlm. caw ofaction, O O L I , ~ ~ ,
fee, a m or Ihbiliw wiutromr d i n s out ofor &tinc to t h c s u b i a r m n a of the
k
t or the pafokunw or non+thcroot
G r rh.~ a & t h s C'iwiniw iu
r i d to luca or nun- anv rernrdv or clam for m
i
s
-,- -l Cimnckv a m i other &ah & or a b y for m y mud or d l q d d e f i i t i&ib-i;of
or
,mbty In privity thmwith or r p n g
l e p l duty on the pl of the Conmckvw any perm, fin
on C o n m a o h bchdf Any llmiutbn or mtnltum rr&udm;thc typ, m m , f m q am-\
or
w e n t of my right, m e d y , d i d , or r e c o w th.1 would othm.iu ba anibblc to the C ' i is
e x W y dirawwc4 excluded born the Dmu ofths w e n t , ud wid.
or
6
Choiceof Law; G d c e o f Venueor F o r m . The munlng kg.1 effcq daforcunmt of
Dnns ud pmvisiona of the 8 m m 1 a d tho molution of m y dispvta 8risiq tharvndcr or
rehtingthmb d u l l be p o w d by the l a w of* Suto of Aimbun8 Rsopl to the extent
o h i r required by sppliuble w n f l ' m ~ f - l . w p . Tho n n u e of m y suit, mion,or
lcpl p & i
bsught to m M or zwm relif by ruron d m y lrvmd k h ofduty
arising out of or reI&g tothe ~ o r r m n s ,DI nmpufomance Of the agreement h I I be
IcITenon County. Alabuna except to the d e n t otbsrwiw r e q u ' d by sppliubb pinciplu of
law.
7.
Condmaiom ofAddendma Nothlng in this Addendm h l l be mutined to m u or i m m
any duty or liability on tha City, to create a right a mmedy in fawr of the ContneIorapinat thc
y thU u mulablo to the C i i spinat the
City. orto mittor 8bmptC m y right or d
fm,
. or mtity u
n
d
u
c
i
Canrncuvorany other p ~ n
Of LW.
8.
~
I E 1mmit101Iom
~
C o r n p u c~ o~ m a co~.storagt- th.1 it will ~uuysanply
with the lmmipuion ReformdConlml Act of 1916, u m e & by the I m m l ~ t i mA a o f
1990. and the B u r o r r H m m n Alabama Tupmud C i t i m P m w i o n Ad, which meka it
unlnvful lor an e m p l o p in A h u w to knowingly him or contlnue to employ an d i m who ia or
h u becomeunauthorized with rrmklto rvsh e m ~ l m mort to fall to comnlv with the 1-9
requiremenu or fails to use E - ~ A f yto nrify th;diiibiIi to leplly wrtmin'theU& S u m
WIthou limitin. the
for d l of ih new h i m who PO e m ~ l a w dto wat in Ihe SUP of Aforcgotng Canmotor shnU n a kniw-ndy employ, hire for cmplc&n&co>he
&&
an uluwhnzd d m , ud h l l hew an oftior or other mvulorvl employee who Is pcnm.lly
funlllv wth thc G n t n W I hums plytlca to u y t . an afMwIt w th81 e m on the h
rmpplud by thc B o d md mlurn thc m e to the CIW Conurtor h l l .Loenmll nthe SVcnfy
A
rn.rcomnnr~a~~mbwslU~Lu)Io
July 30,2012
u
d
Minute Book 84
NOnQ OF -MA
IMMlGRATlON LAW COMPLLANQ REQUIREMENT5TO AU
CONTRACTORS OFlUE
OF MOUNTAIN 8RWK. A W M I
('ALABAMA IMMlGRnTlONWMPUlNQ CONTRACT)
Company ID Numbr: 4708SJ
THE E-VERIFYPROORAM FOR EMPLOYMENTVERlflCATlON
MEMORANDUMOF UNDERSTANDWO
&JmE.l
PURPOSEAND AUTHORITY
m a MemMaIIdum of Undentandhp (MOU) wla forUl the pOlnU d apnaent behvea Vw
Dspsr(mentd Hornsland SkuW (DM) and -eWI.rUl
rspaFdlnp
tho Emp(oyeh partldpaUon In the Embyman1 E l ~ l t VerMuUon
y
Pmgnm (E-Varlff). Thb
MOUa*
mnph f u t u n 8 of the E-VeMy poOnm and w m n b a apchk mponalbslt*.
d WS, the sochl SruW Admhbtmllon (SSA). .ndVw Enplo/sr. E-Ve9 h a pmgmm Vld
ebamnkaltf w n M an w l o m ' a a l ~ M U yto wan h the Unit& Shlea fier cQT$4aUm d
tho Emp(oymt EOpibEty M d b h Form (Form MI. For oawmd pommm( conlWAOn.EV~Iruwdto~~VwenploymatesglbP~d.P~lyNndemployuaand.I~ng
amployoa~nedtoFsdanlomDIdrortow~Vwen(tewon;lonsYlhe~w
fa the E-VeMy pmgnm b found In M* N. Subtn* h d the 1bga1 Immbro(l0n
Reformand lmmbnnt RoapomIblUyM of 19W (IIRIRA). Pub. L 104-208.110 SDL 3009. u
umnded (8 U.S:C. 5 13% nolei. Auihmily fa uu d the E-Ve9 p w g m by Fmianl
omlnsbn and nubsonbodon covend by the 1.mol Subpml22.111. 'EmpbymenI E W W
V
w
, d the Fedeml Acquhllion Ragubtbn (FAR) (hemlmter h n e d to thla MOU ar
m 'Fadan1 rnntracm wlh lhs FAR E-Mrtk daua0.l to wdtd the emDlmmMt ennMk d
Order 12010.a; mended:
mJG!a
NNCTlDNS TO BE PERFORMED
A. RESPONsrnIIITIW OF SSA
e
thal s O ~ mtha Unploya lo
1. SSA a p m to pmvlde the Empbyer wah ~ h M hiamallon
MOU .ndlhe mpbyment autholbdion 0fU.S. cithem
2 SSA qmeato pmvlde to the Emplnya
suhhncs wilh opemlhal poblam.t
may aha dwhg Va Emplopfa paddpaUnnh lhE-MMy pmpram. SSA . p m a lo pmulde
Vw Unploya wtth nama* Ulls8. addfsrrsa, and bhphw numben ol SSA npmaambm to
ba mntnded dvrlng the E - V W pmcsu
P
2;
~
u k d un m a . aid to amlt a o u u to w d ~
hkniutbn. n b appmpiht. by law, ti
IdWuala napmaibls (or h a w n f ~ ~ U odnSoda1 S.curdy Numbas and f a mIu;i(iond tha
E-Vag prognm or such other pmona a enwho may b.NVlahmd by SSA u p o n d
AFFIDAVIT OF A U B * M I IMMIGRAllON COMPUANQ BY A
BUSINESS E~~/EMPLOYWWNTRACTORTO
A WUTlCALSUBDMYON
OFlUE STATE OF AUBAMA
l ~ o * - . , . ~ ~ ~ l * r r , . r a r . l r n " - * a l u r . ~ u - . * ~ . . ~ W n h ~ . r
Company ID Number: 4701SJ
w the P h c y A d (5 U.S.C.
5 552.).
VH
SOdtl S&UfW M (42 U.S.C. 13W(a)), and SSA
mgula(lonr (20 CFR Par1401).
.I*UI.-#llqlOIWYIM
4.W-topmvldea~d8~lednM~nhdbd~~d(hmnj~nwlUl
DHSs 8s y d a if namaauy) to pvM8 mnnmullon M IsnIathm nonmnllrmadon d
U.S. dtbana' arploymant dpWlliy wlthh 3 Federal Gowrnmcntwok dyr d the I n W hqulry.
sated
to p M a a man8 of umnduy vaindon Gndudlng W
U
n
q SSA ncorda u
5. SSA
my b. nmauary) for emplo,en who cmt.rt SSA hnW mmwnth~llonath.1 it dn!gnd
to m
e Rnal conM nvvonfimutbn ot U.S. dhrau' envbYmmt ~W~JMV'
.nd
&ni
n d
&a
(or bdh dlhan. and rm-akena wlthln 10 ~adai.l
a&ncu of
d y r o t l h ~ d m k ~ m ~ u n ~ S S A d e ~ w ~ ~ V l D n l O d a y . ~ b .
n u u n q . In arch m.SSA rill pmvldm addMaul v M & n !mudma
*_J
B. RESPONSBIUIIESOF DHS
1. Nlu SSA wrMer lh. 8 a u - a ol
~ SSA rmada for employee8 throuph W c d k DHS qmw
to povtds lhe Emploler wou to vlsdnd dab frm DHS8 d.tatars to mabb Va Empbf8r
tomnhd.blhMsnt~edbythhMOU:
mtllyirrndqn~on~~~~narnd
IhmMI4 bwlnu mtl~/mplom/ontrrtorshall not t-ly
a p l q . Nnfannpl4mmCa mtinwt o * m d q n m.uhorU.d alm.
Ifunkanathat uld bnlnes m l N / a ~ h w I o ntr~mmledln
r
the E-Vnlh
IAmmA
..womm.
COPY OF m u 8 ORGANUITIOM
I-MUW MEUOUNDUM OF UNDEUTN~DING TO DOCUMENTTWT THC
~UIINIJSEHnN~MPUmR/CONIRICIOIIS
INROUDIh Mf L-MIIW PROGRAM1
~furthrm~~hmal~b.mntnrmnhm*nnp(qnwmm~~mroD*dIn
tha WmWwwpolrmandup~
.
r ~ u a c m ~ w ~ ~ ~ I m l o r m s ~ M n ~ a .l r q ~ .
..
Aulomatsd wrfnwtlon h.du on mp14.w by d d o n l c msuu. and
Pho(o verMoPtion dwdx (whn avalabb) on employ.a.
2. DHS q m a to pmvfde to me Emplopr appmprlrt. 8 U i l t l ~ w t t op.rdknd
h
p m b h th.1
to
MY .18
dump me Employefa putlcipm h
E-V~Q
popran. DHS
We. addmua. and tdephone n w n d DHS m m u n h to~ be
the E d w a r m.
om&
burlnp the E-vediy p-
me
3. DHS ngnea to make autllsbb b the Employar I( the E-VeMy Web rlta and on Vw E-VeMy
(or both
Web bmmsr. Inttru&nal ma1.NIII On E-Vaitf MC(g,pfa4dW.a Md Iquirsme~~IS
SSA and DHS, induding malrktiona on tho u u d E-Vrity. DHS W m a b W e bslnhg
matarialaon E-MMy.
4. DHS .greslto pnmde to the Employer an-,
wNch hdlates the Employsh paddpabn
In the E-VuUy program DHS elm agrwn to pmulde b the Emfloysr anlMbu!nlMllon M(rer
tuued bv Vw Oftla d SwcW Coma1 ki h m k ~ r e ~ s l a t Unhtr
e d Enmbvment
Fm&mn
. .
(OSC). diva Rbhte
U.S. DsolJha.
on.
5 . D M a w u to h u e the Enp(oyna u t r IdanlikaUon n u d m and p a s n d thpt p d l a
the Emplopr to verify InfomuUDnpmvfded by anploy~l
wlUl DHS'a dabbaw.
11. DHS agrees l o nfegwrd UIO Mam~Ilonrmb4M l o DHS by the EEmCloyer, .nd b M
I
to auch InnDrmPtlon to WMdmb raponslble (or the w
m d anployoa'
enpbymsm eUglbUny and (or svaluatbn d Vw E-Mmy pmgm, M to aueh other p s ~ n or
s
enUUIa u may be wthw!z.d by s p p k b b Im. InfomWn w!J bs uud Dnhl to w g the
aceumcf of Saf.1 SeMHy Numb818 and .nploymnt dblbilty. l o enlorn h a l m m i and
~ I d O l 6 ~ ~ ~ U 4 4 r l r W U n D . * M V I A
WmUdhr.paE-V*dfy
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84.
NalbnaQ Ad (!NA) m d Federal crlmh.l laws. and b sbn'nlrlr Fsderal m
mqulmmenb.
m
7. DHS aprar to pmvid. a mema ofauionubd vanllallon l h n b detiplud (in m n j t m l h
a m $34 V U M a M PmCddUmS) to p d d e wnllmmmn or msnl.uvs nonconNMUon d
anployma.'employmen( d~tgBOyuXNn
3 Fsdersl Gomnnwnl v m l dsy.
~
of- hW Inquiry
a. DHS m r w s b cmi& a maam ofsemdarv vehlclllon (Inch~dlnnupdatlnp DHS m r d s m
m.v be r&eawrj) for MVWS
who c m l s r i ~ tenWWa
~s
nonceinmutlonsand pholo m
nuich tsnsnl.uvs~nmmnimipmm UI* b dellpned 0 pid. nnal mnnmuaon a
m n f m n d b n of UN employ& wnploymsnt eCgWty withh 10 F a l a d Oov.rnmat
days ofthe date d m M b DM, unk.8 DHS dehrndn.1 that nvre l h m 10 day8 rmy be
M~.SIY. In akh a u s . DHS nil!povida addlllwl v r H a l b n Insbwllw.
uwa h. E - V W swim for any p l r w a w th.n u authorkd by thls Mu. tho Enplow
~ybewbfedto.ppmphhIqal.slimand(mnh.1IPIofb~ubSSAandDHS
hfiDrmatlon plnuurl to W. MOU.
9. ~I
EmplDysr
IOqm.9 to Wow 1PpopWs pmceduma (ree Amcle Ill. bdm) nwrdhg
tsnoh nnmmmutbnh hdudhp notnylw mvkwa In p M t e of me fbuling and povldhg
Uam w h n nolka d the Indlna. M b M rnlUan n*ml Indmclan. ta -lava
abhw
~~duponapho(ow~~~.tho~mployubrbq;lrsdlowb~rtsp.(.ss~mds
111.8. bslow) to mntsd DHS with WcnnaUon necsupy b nroM the c k l b n p .
10. R* Employu 8 g m s not to bka my 8 d m u ailon agaLul an empbp. bawd upon the
mploy..b prow m p b y m l m9pkUy .tnlus *hR SSA or D M b pmceuhp the
n r l u l b n mud u h s Uw Emdanr abldns h m ? d o a la &.d In I
C.F R 8 274s tmm
that the emdjvr b nol WML a&&&.
The Embw;&~tsndr
lhd lnWLltl bmt&'.G
th. SSA o i DMautonubd M d o n warn' nn' mif" WML w o r l r m -a
nMmnfmmUon, a ors In m n l h w n w ~ d l c l t h r gthe h n d for additlmal bme for &
mmment a ~
I a use),
W
or
Mb ofa photo MIMUMd
,0..not UUMSII. ard
ahouldndbeh(erpslsduHldanee.lhdIhe~bnotworkaumorb.d I n m y d m
a *I and hh oppommity b OMthe
csras btad rbova, the employee mu bs
mdha.andUhor.hadmsw.the.ndouaa~mtbe~adar~~m.dusn.
-.--
C. RESPONSJBIUTIESOF THE EMPLOYER
1. The E m p l g r a p m r to dl&
ltn notlwr rupp&d by DHS In a pmmlneni p k a mat b
d m visible to pmrpedtw employeas and .O emplopas who uo b be V O W lhmuph the
Ivr*m
2. Ra Employer q n e s to pDulds to UN SSA and DHS the namm. W a . addrewas. nnd
Lslephone numbus of the EmploysrmprswnWUvealo be CGnWdedV r d l n p E-VMb.
3. The Employer a g m to bemms hmslar with and mmpQ Wh the mod mwnt w r s h ot Ih
E-Vaily Uwr Manual.
4 Tho E m p l g r q m s hal any E W e r RmrpnsmhUw who *0( pr(onn m p b F e n l
wrihzdon qumrri.8 w#l cavbmnps
ltstho E-VUIIYTuW.l b d w that IndMdwt hhlirtesany q w * r .
A. The Employeragmea lhd all Employer m p n w n b ~ e wlll
a U b the mfmshar tldorllh
hll!&d by tho E-VMfy prcgmm ua mndlllonof mnlinued use of E-Vem.
8. FaUun b mmp*te a mhah.r tulahl wO pmvanl Uw Employer fmm d n u d w
d tho pmpnm.
5. The Empbyaragmes to mmpQWh c u m t Form C8 prOWdU~.Mlh (vlo a I W P ~
w
van mployw pmwts a '~bt
B bisnuty doaamnL h e Emplgn 8 g m s to
~ U I 1 8 ' d ~ b l h a
m h l n a photo. U d B dmvnnW idmURadin 8 C.F.R. 1274.2(b)(lKB))
. .. . un be
p w n l e d dumgiho F& l-9
pmcrss to ealabRsh Identity.) If an .mploym objectsb the photo mqukmeni fcf
diabus r u u n s . tho Employr
should m n h d €-Verify at WM84-4218.
in&
me
w
rhih~dhpdeny~np,k u d n p , or extnkhg work hwn.
or pmhniinp &kg, &Hng
m smplDysetoruorkIn poororwndiaom. nhobb 8aWnthe anploymb a F e d e d m h d
or OWurCnment, or othamf.s rutjwctingan emp(oyw to any usumpllon that he or she b
unauthorlzad to WML) unul and unbaa m n d q wMcaUon by SSA or DHS h u besn
wmpbted and a nnal nonmnfinmmn h u bM M.
U the employes do- not c h m to
~
m n M s t ~ n o n e o n ~ o r a p h M o M m M l e h o r H a ~ M c s l l o n b
mmp*td ard a mat wnmnlhmllon b lilued. (hon L a Employr u n find UH a p l ~ y s e
b not
vorlr adhaiud and taminale the mploya'. employmnl Enpbyrn or 0mploy.a with
qwaLbns .bana lind n w m n m U o n MY dl E - V W at t4388-484-4218 or OSC at Id00
2550155 or 1600237.2515 (TDD).
r(
ACI d ~ e w
and a
t I. m a ~ m p l o y aagrws to mmphl wm TIL~ VII d th ~ l v i~l l g h b
2748 c4 lhw IN% u appkablmr, by not d
m unl;wluny apaht any -al
h Nmg.
~,aRcrummntormhmlpr~b.cruudN.orhnrurionllo~ha.bthr~da
pmledd hdivldud u dallnad h
2748(aH3) of the INA, Luuw d hb a ha
?4
a
I t an employw pasnb a DHS F m C551 (Pemwent ROddEnt Card) or F m I-7W
Document)to mmpleto (hs Form I-8. UM Employera g m to
(Employmnt
m a b a photocopyo f d c c u and to mtaln the phd0mpy with tho mployw's
Form W. T h e p h o t o c o ~ ~ r t b s o f s v m d s n t q u s U y t o ~ ( o r v ~ l o n o f t h e p h a o
Company 10 Number: 470893
~~274BofUwINAor~VII~y~bdbtheIrmh.(iondbpmdprSonhE-
Company ID Numbr: 4708S3
and mlmInfomallon. Ihd ew40y.r rriO u w me phohww to vuny UN phoh, md 0
~MDHSrrlthPmk,ofphotorohms(sh.rLat.nmnbl(.dby~m.NO(.
thdmpq.ssnWnV*~htbpmUn~UttA.orLM~andLMCCdocumnbUon
b c o m b l e thmr Form CO. DHS mn In the Mum d a b d oVln documant. Uul
6. Tim Ewoyer undenW Usat par(ldp.llon h E-V&y do- n d exempt Vie Enployer horn
Uls rarpondMlly lo mnwlete, mlaln, a d maim ava!hbb far Inspellon F m CO that data b
UI mrmpkww, or (mm other mquhmonW d q p h b k mgulatbru a kn, InduQng (h.
oblkahn to c o w rrlm V* mlhalmhltbn mqufnmsn~cf d o n 2748 of the m~ wh
m d b Fmn 1-9 LImmhtrn s
&
br thmr blpwfna d m d m u i n m n b a a a h b bv
dcscmed h &i&h
5 ;bovd: (2) a rabuttabd. &umdlon Is edabilshsdthat Uld
h~ M vlohiod siccion 2 7 u 1 ( a ~ i f i ofm ~m&~n(lmbnd
+llolu~ly M (INA) m
loth. hiring of any hmvidwl HH obhinr conrimutlonot tha Idanbly and empbynud dlgWRy of
the indibidwt h good faith avnplbncr wh the loma and wndllbns of E-Verify: (3) th
Empbyu mud notib DHS H H & u a
to ampby any smpbyw aitaf mwivhg a lhsl
nnmn(tmullon. and b w b b d to a dvl mwy p n *
b8lwwn $550 and Sl.tO0 tor rich
calwe b noWy DHS of m n t h u d rnployment Wwuhg a W ~ M I C O I I ~ (4) thmr
Em&,
hs u b M to a rebulhbh armhat It ku Imavlmk s m h d .numutkahed
ti&
' d n h l i y Uabb under any lrrr lor my.*hbn
h gmd'ljl(h b;ud i n hfamdion pmvl;lod
through tho aminnation wlm. DHS n w m the right lo condud Form I-9 and E - v r ~ y
wtsm mmpli.nw bup.d&u dump the mum ot E-Vem, ns wdl u b condud any o i h r
~ hltbb E-Vulb veMWJm pmcsdwea f c f new employow withh 3
7. Th.Enplow a # m b
has t a n hind (but a(lw the ~ o r m
1-0 has baa
~mployerh h n a a days after . ~ h
m n w h l d . and to d e l e u maru (but a*l as m y ) It- of UN LV8dt9 P m m a a am
n&ury~acvxding lo ih. E - V W usif Mand.ah th.csu of Federala i l n d o n with he
FAR E-VMly &use, tha E-Verity Uwr Manwl for Federal Conlmctm. Thmr Empbyer b
pmNbilad horn InrUlling vuMaUon prowduru b.(onUw vrployr h u &n hL.d md the
Form 1-8 mmplebd It the autormted s p a m lo be querbd b IempavRl unevaibbk. th Idy
Una
hgood
.xiandad
aasn(ian.l Inpaod
adu la
th. E n a l a v d *
.aarla6
. . ..
... (alth,
- - - untO
.
.i. a&
&mp(ing,
to- I
i;duurd;burlng-UN
o( ~manwmdats
G~ih-~-av~E-mpl-ovsn-,mov
hUlah wi'WM bv notllhn the Form 1-0 in cbwnmlanms *ham tha mmbm8 has a m
for a Social S a u d r j ~ u r n b o i fmm
f ~ ~V*
~ SSA and h vmNnn to n a i v e k i SSN. &ad
that UN Emplgn brfornu M E-~alrbampbymM1 voficati& qwry ushg UH e & y a ' s
SSN u won utha SSN buwrms m h b b .
Vetiff. If the Employer has any qusrtiDnr mlalhg lo UIe anlWbu!mm pmvlrbn, ll should
conlad OSC d ldW-2556t55 or tdOM37-2515 WD).
12 The Emp1oy.r q m s to mord th wm vadbtbn number on ltnnnployw's Fonn C9 a
b plnt tho v n s n mnhlnlng tho u s e v a h U o n number and .Itach il to UN empbp#s Fmn
CB.
-
13 The Empbyer q m n that U MI use mmr Infomrbn ll roM.hom SSA or DHS wnuanl
to E-v*m, a d 61s MOU ci& to mnnm the a n v b n m t mrapib~i~
ot .mpb/..s u au~l0rb.d
b, lhh MOU. Th. EmalOvar m n a thll Y m'l u
f d thb hfmmlbn. and r m n s of
pam &er than employees of the &;npo
l ysr
r;ho vs ;Ithorlred to parform the ~mpkqw'i
r a p o M W s s under lhb MW, execpt (or wch m n t l o n as may be au(hwhed h admw
by SSA or DHS for l e g m e pvporr
-
14. RU Empbyer ukmwMges thd Uw InhnaUon wbkh t ncsim horn SSA b povsnwdby
th RlnnM (5 U.S.C. 4 SU.m(t) and (3)) and thmr Social
M (12 U8.C. l3W8)).
Ird lhd am' aanan rrha
&lv
thh h(omrtlan d a r h b amlsnas or
It
(a
a v
15. The m o y m a g m s to m o p n t e WWI D W and SSA h Vldr mmphm monlloring md
m h t b n of E-Vetlb, irrludina by wnnillinp DHS and SSA upon mamubb cdw, lo d e w
Fmrm C9 and other emplolmeni ncordr and b h b h H ad Ib .rrgloyen regardlw tho
Emplqefs u r of E-Verity, and b respond h a Umiy and srmmlmr m m r to DHS requaU
tor hfomIbn nbtlng lo tha(r pracptlon In E-Vdy.
D. REbPDNblBIUTIESOF FEDERALCONTRACTORSWlTH THE FAR E-VERIFY CLAUSE
1. The Empluwf undofalands tM IH b a s u W to the empbymnl w d b t l o n Ierm
In SubpulU.18 of the FAR. I( mwt vu& th 0nWymet-deilplblQ of my e h l h g amployu
urlpmd b the m n h d and al new hhs. a d u u r v d In the Supplaantd Gulda for F e d d
Cmlndm Onra an mrm
m
l w h" bsan v a r l k l M E-Vmrdh' bv UN E m d m r Ik
a F.d.dmntndonwithIhaFARE-V*m,JDwqm(obcm*hmiPnrwiUland
wmpQ Wh the moat mwnt wrdms of the E-Vulb~.U
I
Manual for F e d d ConIradon nd
IhE - V W Swpbmenid Quid. for F & d Contradon.
b F.d.nl mMdm with the FAR E-V&y d u n a
Feded mnblcton Wh the FAR L V m y &use.
p to mmpbta a M0d.l for
8.
not 10 USE E - V W PIWOdWW f a P M - M V ~ Y M ~
of fob
appllcma, h wpporl ofany unhful mploymnI pmdw, or for any o(hw USE mt a u k i &
by this MOU. Empbymrn mud u w E - V e 9 (or al new employra, unless an Enpbyrr h a
E .m
u
Fadad m n t n d a lhrt oudiilu ta UN u o a o b m d d b s d In Ad& 11.0 <.a --
E Fedenl mhdmwith the FAR E-Ved$ d a u a mi anmOed d UN Ume of mnbaQ
rmrd: An E m p M that b not enm4bd h E-V.dfy at UN linn ot a m n h d w r d mud arcd
u a F.d.RI eonIrador wHh tha FAR E - V W &USE h E-Vm'b wiUlh 30 dendm day^ of
p w i a d h ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ . k ~ ~ * ~ ~ m t k m n y ~ ~ n d w ~ m ~ ~ ~~ m
mu yd de . s
~ B. O d m o f . n m l l n w n t h h t o u u E - V n i l v t o ~ 4 ~ n o f
nnpbyn*d
en',moity of new h k d the EmEmplole; rrha vs-viwl&g h the unitad S(.Ln,
h k d W o n thmr a M l n due ofthb MOU R* Ernploysf undemlands that M tho E n p l g r
-
h g . l * t a ~ w m w ~ ~ c - ~ ~ r m ~ ~ ~ ~ m nnr..dk...palE.V.,lry
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Company ID Numbmr: 470883
Cwnpny ID Number: 470883
wi~lulu
or m t aubmi lo the conbad o m h e ~ m p l o y u
begha verwhg new hhs, such
v a l b t i m d m h h 8 mud b8 W a d *ilM 3 burinus d8yr elhr Uu dale of h h . Oncs
enrdled h E-VOMy u 8 F e d d wnwith the FAR E-Vdy daUW. (he Empbyer mut
WUdowrMoUondam~w(llnadlo(hecanMwMtnDO~dovrfmm(heUnw
d enmlhncnt h the qttem;ld a i t u k e dale ad n b d n p which .mpkyau hbe wmed h
E-Vew awahln 30 dyt o f m mp&y&a nulgnnmnt reoLwhlchsvsr d.te b W .
d.(nnim8th.lmmUIM10dqab~.The~rwreerto~(heE-verity
q8cun npuluty lor caw updates.
d. Enpbm thal a n atoody e n W h E-Verlfy P( h 8 Urns d8 mrlrsd mud M are
not mmUd In tho 8 y l t m a a Fad& mnbPctor uah h e FAR E-VrHy dauw: Enpbyrr
.n~WhE-\lenfyforWdqsormond(heUmofa~nMmtrdmvduwE-VrHyto
hib.(swidlubonotwrplWmtdlpbillybrmhirard(he~erwhom~Inhe
Llnitsd SbtlU.. wheVar or m t eulpned lo (he cmbmd, within 3 bwlneu d y a mbt Vu dab of
him. E m p e a snmlled h E-vmy.
I
a~ man a Fedenl mnmdor with the FAR E-vouy
dauw, mud updab E-VaMi to hdtcal8 h.1Umy 8m a Fedeol wnlrsdor with the FAR G
Vuify dww wihh 10 dyt 8lhr .ulgnmnt lo the wnlract If the w
r b OnmUed h EVrHyforWd~dqsorhud(he~ofconbnd&,th8EnpbyrmnfhhOO
dqrof.n~ntbopinlouuE-V~toWti.(.wrMaUondnarhimd(hemntndor
rrhO~wl*lnnh~UnledS~.rrh.thaa~urhdtotheeM~Such~
o f w h t r u G u d b 8 hiiWf.d&
3 b u t l n s u & y s ~ ~ r ( h e d 8 b d ~ . ~mp(alar
An
d l e d u a Fe&d wntradu wWI the FAR E-Vmir dun In E-V*
mutt W(ia(e
WrlkaUon of each e q l q m aubnsd lo the mmrsd h l n W akndar days a b r dale of
m n a c t mard or within 30 day8 after urlgmmnt lo tho contrsot w N c h m b later.
e. I
d Mghw .duuUon. Sb(e, b d and MLul gaommnl8 and w m b m
Fdeml cMtr8dom u4h (he FAR E-Vmty d a m M u s h d l u h s d hipher edvutlon (88
ddned at 20 U.S.C. 10011s)). Slate a I d oowmmntl. nowmmentl of F s d s m mmankd
awnq purruant to a p s r l h a n w b n d my choas lo o;*/
MW and d u n g employas.
aalpned lo the F d d a n b l d . Such Fadad m n m h vllh (he FAR E-Vodfy d a u n may.
homwr, #lad to w m ly n
w hIm8,andlor .I1 oxbtinp employ088 hkad d b r Novsmba 6.
1 0 ~ 1 . n m p w l w d M W . I I O , p r q n p h s l . 8 a n db ~d t h h M O U ~ U m h m r
for InIII8tb-q smploym8nt venhUon d em#oy.n urpd to a a n b y l wply lo wch
Mdulbna d Nphsr edumbn. SUle, kkA and W povmmenl* and wr&a
f. VerMcPlbn 04 a!omployw: Vpon mmRnmt. Em#oyemrho a n Fsdaal wnb.don
*ah (he FAR E-Vodfy d8uw may &a lo v d t f smploynwnt enplblny d 81 rxbtlllp snployea,
~ I n t h o U R L . d S I . 1 . r w h o . * w o h h d 8 n * N w e m b n 6 .tBW,MeddwrVqlngorJy
m employ.88 and
exbung o n p b y m d g n d to 8 m m d Faded m n b r l A ~ U
cmrdmnl. Empbyon rmtt #lad to do w onty h tho manner &dgn8W by DHS and Wli.18 EVmKy vainam of a# oxiathp e w w s v m f n 169 d q a +nor h e s k b m .
9. M n I-9 pmwdures for emting employ- d F a M amb'8dm with the FAR Ev d y dam:Federd wnbedOm with (he FAR E - v qdauw may ~hoo)sM mm#ee MW
Fonna 14 for a0 8 M h g employens othu miln mow thal are ~ompls(slyexempt from thb
~10~88
F .e d d w n t n d M wih U* FAR E-Varlfy dauw may aIw update pmvlwtly
mmpI8l.d Fomu CO to inilhh E-Varlfy vaiUmUon of exbtinp m p b y H I who a n not
m P t M8 bilp O8 thd Fmll
b & ~ t l OllClUdh9 (he SSN), WmpEa8 vllh
~
b
w
mrmbU in m CO mn8blant hAmd. ll.C.5. or uodatl (he D&S
CO
lopwid.~(he~htnlormr~a~~f~tdthe~am~bom~ivvsldandup(p
dale and thm fmn olhwrlw mmphr with *mc* ll.C.5, but m k b docunmnlsUon (wch u8
U.S. paupofl or Fmn 1551) hat @red wbuquent to mnvbtlon d Vu Fam 1-0. d s
Employer shal no( requln the pmduc(lon d addltlonal doarmr2.Uo11, a we tho phom
Um Emdover
l a e m h a md ds-
NoUtlm In thb w&n
In AIWh I1C 5 sublac( lo urv 8&OUorul or suasrud!m Inml8 wb~&-in mb Suppl-n~
Gum for-~.dersl-~ontnmn
8hal b8 conaru.d b m u h 8 uoond wrhlumn u d m E-VerW d mv
M
~ a orto
j , auttirke v e r ~ o t G nof any i x b empbyea
~
by any dmpbyer thit L m t a FO~ORI
m w o r wlh (he FAR &Verify dauw.
2. The Employs u-nds
he ilIt b e Faded canmior u4h the FAR E-Volfty d a m , lb
with thl8 MOU I8 8 psr(onnsrC0 W U l n r l l W l l undu (he WnlU of tho Fedsml
m
b
m
l a submnbrt old Ma E-ar
m-t. lo Ma mbaw d InfemuUM &tho la
ofl&8 .ulhorb.d lo m v b (he E&ek
wmdhr~h
0 F a d dw n b a c l h m u k e m n b
. -rRnCiElll
1. lf(he Empbya n a b a t n W e n o n w n m n b u d by SSh tha Empbpr mu81p h t
the noUwu d i m d d bytha E-Vdfy q 8 t m d povideR to the mnpWee w WU*
empnuy ddennim *haha h4 or .ha w# contest the lentallwe nononfirnullon. The
Employsr mud review the t e n W e nonmn&m&nn Wh (he employ- h prlvate.
2. m e Enploy* wll n(er mploywa to SSA (hld oftlcss only as dlmded by the ~ u t m n b d
q8bm bawd on 8 t n b h nomnmrtllon. and orJy a h th. Empby8r mcuds (he ore
vriksnon
a.
d..
d.m
Up(
.-...
.numbn.
.. - - r..
..k
.the
.- lnaut
. -.to
..d.
.
.
- v
,inn.
- ..
.
.
. mn.
. ..d
-. .d.lurmn"
.
.
...
-. t k ,
the bnwh nonm-n.
Tho Emplq8r ml tranwnii tho Soda1S.arlly
Nvmbn lo SSA kf WIifidon 80.h If thh
h d b b 8 8 W d lo do W. Tho h W b 4 O t will
w e
-
-
Em*
r m d nv*w (he bnUtln nonmnllnn8Uonhthe employee In prlvale.
3. The Employ.r agree8 to Mu1ndlvidu.b b DHS only wh.n the employ.. choorer to mntm
e Unbliw nonmnllmdan rnalnd fmm OHS a h t a d nrlrrrblon
ar &a mm
de&e
w m u the ampbvee c o n m u (he ten&
al!ar (he mpkyer racebin..
Mncmnmuon 8s -8;
~.&i;r;Bh
4. If 0 8 a m b y w w n k b o Ir,hllw nmanUm&n b u e d by DHS. the Emplqa M
pmvid8 the anvbyw with a roiunl IaIhr and Inmud the employee lo cedm OHS t h q h Y.
loB(m bane (as l o w d on the nhrrdI*lm) rrlUJn 6 Fderal O o v s m t w r k days.
5. fI (he anployeewnlert, e bnt.tiw mncomlmuUon bawd upon r pholo nnmstch (he
Empbyuwil pmvide me mploy.8 with 8 m h m l htlulo DHS. DHS will e l . c b o n h & ( l ~ u n l
d d(he m f d lo the Employsrwlhin 10 Faded 8vernmnlwork d q a of- &ml
unbuIdasrrmnuhPtrnom(h.n t O d a y r b n a w ~ v y . T I m E ~ e r . g m t o d * c L ~ E Valfy qslern npularhr (a caw updates.
(he m
6. Tho Empbw .pnnthallf an omploy.* mnOsm 8
t nonamnnmth
~
b.Md
~
upon l
Photo mmutch. h e ErnPbyr wil u n d 8 Wpy Of (he emyoVWW8
Fonn Id51 or Form I-7W b
DHS(orm*wbv.
~unnlng
and u p k d h g (he d m m n C a
~sendhaphotao~ofthedau~byan~umllumuntWfor~
wen-).
T.(
8
f)
z
4
7. If the Emdq8r detumhes hat (hen I8 8 photo m
W *hen mmpuing Vu photM 8 d a w n 1d w c f b d h M W e ll.C.5 wllh (he lrmpe pOWmsdIn E-Verity, lh8 Employer
mult (0nnrdth8 8mpby~a'SdOQImnutM lo DHS l n h g Of10Ofthe mauU doh a8
w i n p PWraph. 8nd 8la* DHS to mrdvs (hecPls.
.
SMandDHSvAlnot~eVu~(or~~Mw~psrtDmmdunderhbMDU.
The Employer Is rapomlbb (or pmvlding equipment nmded to make hquMes. To .crsar EVmW, M Employerwill md a psrronsl Emputcr Wlh internet wxsu.
PARTIES
and atW wntlnum In Mod tor ulong
as me SSA and DHS condud the ~-verlP,u m m u n b u modmad h with bv (he mmut
m 8 e n l of PP parties. or brmlna1.d bv ambrtv-yw(~30 d m LV& vnIUen no& 6 (he dm.
Am, m d d l q8Um O n h M s s m b b Vd E-~inni
poqomby'OHS or SSh hcludlng M not
h i b d to the E-Vdfy dmddng ag8htt DddlDnrl drtl w u m s d hrtiltdhg ns* verlbtlon
pmwdura, M be c w m d under mb MOU and wR not auw Vu md for 8 wpp*mnte(
Wth.l~s(h...*.npe%DHS.9mtoMnnnployaona#ch.nprrMdoloE
V e w thmuph Vu u w of mand8loV rdrmher lutdwb and updstn to Uu E-Vew Uwr
Manual. the E-V&
Umr Manual far Faded C o m n or the E-Vadk Sudsnanhl ~ t h h
tor F a d d ~ o n b l c Even
k
*IMch.npu to E%%y. DHS--rvk-&&hl
omploya to blu manddoy mirnhar M O W SAn Enplow tM b a F a d d mnbldor u4h
Um FAR E-Verlfy dun may l e M d 8 mb M W wlmn Vu Federal oMmd h.1m u h L
A. Thb MOU b M e d v e upon the ebnaNm ot a!,ae@
l
-
cGui
-
A. REFERRAL TO SSA
.
2. If the Emplqer nnda a photo m m n c h form
who pmvma a d m m n t tor Irhh
(hee~tadry.tanhV.~ephoto,(heemployumudprlntthe~mmnsl&
tnllh nonmnllrmrtlon noUw m d W d by (he ~uiomatedw.tsm and wvlde it lo (he
a p l w w halh e o n p b m may detuml~whomerh. or
c o n ~ . U k* d h . Tho
conbMawih (he FAR €-Verity dauw mud prwld8wM(.n n o w to DHS. Ifan Enployr mat
b 8 Fsdanl mmndor wXh the FAR E-Verity C h u r 1.Ut b M
e such noUm. Ih.1 Employ.r
vl mmah 8 o.rUdopm !n Ma E-V& am-. ull rwuln b a u d
b.
-.
, lks
- urn
- - d INS YOU
.
m a a m to &&b
mat am not F i e d & m c l o i u;LLh &FAR E - V CIS~
I rvm
REFERRAL OF INDMDUALSTO 88A AND OHS
---
1. Ifthe Empbyu mwbr a l e n t a h nonmnfimu(ion W e d by DHS. the Ernpbysrmnlphl
hn!ah m m n r n a h n o h as d h b d by the E-vew qctarn and parlds I to (he
W A81 (he eIllF4OWe M y d8bmhe Wh.U*r ha or dl8 h. WntcI8I Um Lsn!dm
Mnconnmuuon. n m m p b y w must m*w (he tnhh nmanhmh wid tha
h
*te.
Company U) Numbmr: 470803
Company ID N u m k 4 7 0 l O J
Mldo II.C.5, h e u n d w d 8 wollr .ulhoikaUm ha8 mt ushd. and the E&va
hsr
m*md the hiornu& d n a d h the Form CO ellher h o m m i or h communla&.hh
the
to m8um that U* employee's d8t.d b8b In rodbn 1 d the F m CO for wwk
ern8h u not ch8ng.d (hdudhp. M no( Pmllad to, 8 W1pmur*nt nridml dbn
h.vhgbaoom8ndUf8!dUS dtizen) ifheEmpby.rbMablelode-lemh.h.1(heForm
I-QmmdbshMld8llC5 KIh.enalw88'sM.torwatauthor(utlonu~h
I(ui-rm; be pwldad
6.REFERRAL TO DHS
-- - --
3. if (he w
o
y
e
e m m s m an SSA IeNaUve nonmnNMtlon, (he Employer ml pmvldo the
arpromwimo~m(.d~onsl~tlsrandhhn(meompby~tovlrnanssA
o b vUlin 8 F.dsral Oonmmnt w r k d m . SSA dl d d m n k a l y IrPn8dt tha n8Ulof the
Rhd t o w Ewbyuwithh 10 Fadad Oovommnt wcikdayr dthe mhnd unlouU
- - --
--
8. N ~ r h n d I n A
g&&
V, put A of hb MOU, DHS m
y termlnrte Ma MOU If dam
n k a w beaure of h a requtrunonh d lu a pQy, or upon a d d m h t b n by SSA a
DHS Uul Lam h u been 8 breach 04 q
m Inlegtit, or Murit,by the Emp(y.r, or a h J u n
on the part ol U* Employer lo amply ulV, artsblhhed pmcsdum8 or 1ep.l m q u h a t r
Employer undrrland8 t h d If n Is o Federalwnblaor with (he FAR E-Verlfychuae.t m h
dwMOUbyany~r(y(orn).-mplnepr~8Mclbpsr(omuncedbmn~
rMpon&amu.
rn
C. Som or .d SSA m d DHS mpormlb0itIu und8r thh MOU m
y be penbnmd Dy
wnbldM(8). and SSA d DHS M y
vaa*slbn m8pondbir&h8 b.Mn each 0 t h a
t h 9 may delennlne -$my.
By wpar8le agnannt with DHS. SSA ha8 Wmad lo Wrrn
lampolibiWle8 ud a w b d In thb MOU.
mdh.plE-VuIIy
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Cunpany ID Numb% 47195
D.NPChln@k~MOUblntandedorlhaddbsmnsbued t o a w u ~ y r l g h t o r b s n s n t
or pmcsdura~,snrorceabia st ~m
by any fi~d
pariy a
~w Unllad siatss. it;
amnde,oitksn, or omploy.~~,
oragsh.(
E w e r . R. a @ o mofken, or amp-.
me
E. Each patty ahall b.aowy mponrible tor dofanding any dafmor udbn against H &in@ out
dor m h d to E-VeW or mb MOU whah.r cMI or uirnlnal and for any lhbllihl wi~emlrom,
W i n g (but not Wlod lo) any d k p k bobmen Uw ~mploy&and any other penon or sn(ity
mudiw Ulo appOubilityof Sadon 4OJ(d) d IlRlRA to any ocUon taken or albgedr taken Q
me unprovsr.
F. Tho Employer undentuda lh.1 h e M d It. par(*lp.tlon in E-Verity b no1 conManlid
InbmhMdmybodhmredua~orrsqutedQhandDHSwSSApoPr
hdudlq but not l i M M. Cmgrau&lll ovsnbht E-Vdfy publiehy and m d a lnquih:
datumhaha of complmw wilh Fe&ml -al
rqulmmsnt., and m a p a m to hqutrba
Ad (FOIA).
under t h Fnedm of IniormpB~
0. Tha Iwsgdng coNllM.a Uls bP agmmant on lhb a u b w betweon DHS and the Emplgr.
/I.a e h
'AM yon wrlfying for mom t$n 1 site? 11yea, plShW
p&7exc
1
number of aitu wrllled lor
H. lim hdMdwla whose algmlursr appwr bsla* repm.snt lhat lhoy am au(horbed to wtsr
Inlo lhb MOU on b e W o f b Employaand DHS mspmvdy.
Information relating to the Program Admlnblrabr(s) for your Company on pollcy
questions or o p n t l o n a l problams:
To bo accaptad u a putlclpant In E-Varlfy, p u ahould only alpn th* tnpby.r's W
of thw alpnltum papa. If you hwa y quntlona, c o n t ~ cE-vwty
t
d w46uzo.
n
p r o Stone
~ ~ Elsslrfc Company, h
h
r
auh Woodall
PpP"
srtnsnt ofnomdnnd kudIy-VMcaUon Dlvblon
-
IUr'-hp-Mlp
O ~ U I l SlPInd
y
!1- - -
E
-.----LI
MUIoii
..-
Informalion Requlmd,
-1
iha &Verity Program
Intonation relating t o yo"rCmpan:
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
WHEREAS, AmcndnrntNo. 772 ofthe ConrtiMi3n ofAhbura(1901) (Section
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BElWEEN CITYOF MOUNTAIN BROOK
and EVSON, INC. and DANIEL REALTY COMPANY, LLC
lbk h b p m M m c n ('Agramcnt") b krcby d
c and c m m l hto onthe
94.01(a)(3) ofthe R s w q M CoasWbnofAhbama and hercider r e E d to as 'AmsnimcrdNo.
772"). audurhss the City to s N r ole a$yssmcnLsbrthe prnpow ofpmnutbgcwmnic devEbpm;d
-
wiLhhtheCty.and
WHEREAS, the C j . Ws and d c t c m k W t h e Projectand the ihhuum inpmwmcnb
day of
.1012(%l%&
DaIe"), k h m h C I N O F MOUNTAIN
BROOK, ALABAMA Bcreiu&r, Ihe "Cay"). a nnmiciial wrporafon organid and c*
udcr
w q k f o n is n the k s t inems ofthe City and the pubk and wil promote the scommic dcwbpmcm
the b\vx ofthe State ofAhbanm, wiuw mtics address h 56 C h h Sheet, Momah Bmok, AL
ofthe City,and
35213 and EVSON, INC. ("Enon") MM a n u wrporatD~rcgiRcd to do b u r k x n A h b m
WHEREAS, the C'k f i r
and d e a m i w ltntwnplctonofthe Pmjcet will k of
an Ahbann hid hbiky wnpany.
and DANlEL REALTY COMPANY, LLC (r)y;rl),
s @ i h d ewmnic k m B to the Ciy and u Boad of Educuion through the gewntion ofrc&ml
to do b u r k u in Ahbam C r c k t k r , mk&ly
rchmd to as "COMPANY") uiww
s
,
& tax% bdgig pxes, burixs b c e m e Fxs, p c d Fxs and ad d r e m
addhnal school a
m I i c addrcu b 3660 G
d
h Parkmy, Sldc 100 Bbmhlsham,AL 35243.
Pmpcrty a=%and
RECITALS
WHEREAS, blb\\hg careful mmidcraton and rcliow, the City ha dctermhrd ltnt
WHEREAS, the C'iyderircr to support and cmoumgs ewmmic dcwbpmcm wvithb the Ciy
w q l c t o n ofthe Pmjca inaceonlanu: wih sad pkm, rpci6cJfonr, and d c r o l i i and \ t h h
inorder to ds\cbp yd nnk& a m n g bc;llw m w , k r c a w cmpb)mcrd oppomniics, p m m k
t e r n oftlin A p c m n t ye in the ka iUcrcsI ofthe Ciy, as the Project will r e d h ymng nhsr
rcphcemcnt o f a h comnushl mncturcs, bmden the C Y r tax baw and irreaw rcvclucs n onler
Ihkp, an exparnun and enhyremcd ofthe C q ' r economic and tax base, M i r r u s c n empbyxnI
to p m d e mcssaty se.mixsto thc rcrlsmr ofthe C i .h u inpm*
the qmMy of& for l
the City which ua annst m v
oppomnkks, a d c w b p m d of outdated c o m r c Y pmpsrty $6
rcsidcnr; and
burksscs to the Ciy, and r c p l v m r n ofotddatcd ruidctdial unP wilh m hour* I&;and
WHEREAS, Evron O\\N c c d rcal pmpcrty i d c W on E a t "A" B c r c d l c r r c B d to
WHEREAS. the Ciy Itw d e t e d hat c m h g hto thk ApcmcIIwiO m u l in s i p h n t
as them
cporF'"
wmbtilgofapproximtcly 28 acres tlntb bcatcd &%I
thc corporate Iinb ofthe
k n e e to the pubk, and tlnt the p m c i krsofscrw
~
a KIM and ndfiEtnt pvblic pwpow; and
3
n
6
k4
WHEREAS, the City and the COMPANY d c s k to m c m o d k the tern, wniiinr. and
WHEREAS, the COMPANY h n d s to dcwbp the Pmpcrty for rcsidcl.lhl rclaaand
Orvrbpmnl Agrcrmnl bcluwn
Lily olMounlain lmok.Evron. lnr. and
a n k l finny cawany. LLC
w m n h l d c w b p m d n aceanlance w t h pkm, spcci6wfom, and u d c m k i i appmwd by thc
C'iyderapplicabk s i y o r d ' i and rcp.hhns, as m r c 66yrslfonhin 2.1 bcbw (d
d c w b p m d bchg hcrcktkr rcfemd to as 'Ulc PmjccIq; and
W H E R M , the Pmjcct, uknwmpkmd,
mrmal obl@bm ltntwmprirc thir Agwmcm
NOW, THEREFORE, 6 r p A and vahnbk mmidcnubnand the mnnlpmndrcs and
wwrnnr wt fonhkrch h rccsipt d ~ c n s y o f w h i c hb krcbyackmu~kdgul,the p
6
' crgsdcd to gsmntc
dQ-bC du in
exccx ofappmrbmfclyS65.0W.000 and the crcafon ofnswjobr wilim the Cty, and
ARTICLE 1
WHEREAS, to m q k the Projccc the COMPANY 6 schedubd to wnmuctand mLlO
s
i
i and d c d public bfmmuum hmvemcrll, i r b d o g cyansun and cdmcemcd of the
public m t mn\ol* n M O M Bmok V
W ,road +rowmnh dcsipcd w inprow mlik Bow
and clinimtc raEy h m d s , cxtcmnn of the pedcmian way lhro&out the Pmpcrty and to l no*
DEFINITIONS
the pat!+
shaE haw the mc*
set forthin 6.8 bebw.
1.1
" A p p m d Ass-
1.2
"Appmwd Arr&mcm" W haw the msanilg s t 61th n6.8 bcbw.
13
collrmctun o f n o m a r ~ r o w m c m
to conpkmcd the C i ' s stommter digaton pmjccC
dcwbpmcd of w b b p z n space, and
h
as b b m :
~c~
d mllcsred bythe Ciy
Pmpsr(yTax Rcwnuc"mcam the QWS a v u ~ and
b m M u n i c i PmpcrtyTwr asofOEtokr 1.201 1 and dcscnkd
on Edibi"D"
atraehcdkrctoanddcapartkreo~\\.hthlaxnw~asofO~obcrl,2Oll
b
henlory in Motmlah Bmok Vita@ to
Nppon the Pmjsa; and
u ~ r a d s dbytheCiyasIhemand conecttaxrsv~mrccsivcdbytheCiyas
WHEREAS. the COMPANY b sckduM to w q k t c Nsh i u k m c t u r c npmwmcnu in
w m & n w i h iu dswbpmm and mnpkfonof thc Pmjccc an in accordvrr uilh p h and
rpecitixhm appmud by the C ' i d c r appEcabk C'q o r d M n w and re@
rcLcIcd on their books and mds.
1.4
and pumnmto
% a s h Saks Tax Rswluc"mca~1the sakr tax menu: wkctcd by thc C ' i b m all
d u ~ r o n t h e P m p c r t y f o 12-mnhpcmdcndqonkmkr31,2011
r~
and dswnbed on E M U'D"athckd krcto and nude a p m kmC uhkh tax
theIenM0fthkAgrWnc~and
WHEREAS, Ihe COMPANY inends to ima or cause to k i n s d appmimkly Om
rcwnrasofDncmber31,1OII 6 ~ ~ b y t h c C i y m t h e m r a n d m n s a m
H u d d Twsnty M&n D o h (S120.0W.OW.W) inthe dewbpinmtand wnpkfonofthe Pmjcct,
r c w m rcccivcd by the Cky as rctktsd on their books and m n l r .
which wi! i r b the d m b p m and w n p k b n o f n a j o r inhmmm inpmwnrn!s, as m r c
1.5
'Fiy"sh0rekrtothe CiyofMomtan h k , Abbrrm.
~dcsc~n~Pmje~PhandontheIhtwtbrthonGmmt"B"u,mbAgrssmc4and
1.6
"Cuhcr Road Inpmwmn!s'rlnn haw the -XI
L k v c b p m l A ~ m m kt-n
d
Lily olMounUin BookEv.on.bc,nnd
h n k l RnUy Conpnny. UC
forth n 3.2@) k b w .
L k r r b p m n l A#mcmnl b.1-n
Lity olMovnllin Bmok Evson.tnc and
I h n k I R u U y Conp.ny.US
July 30,20 12
Minute Book 84
cuhenr, rilnvnkr, and othcr irpmvemm necessary m p m d e
1.8
1.34
Itcsilential Phue" rhaP have h
mset bnh hthc PIID A p p W n
W
d k dedicated d o r m h s m d or w n w c d m h C$
appon thc Pmjcetwhih w
136
Rsmhnpe"sWhaw thc &set
and\~~harcmrs~uhrly4bnhm~iT"andTI"atndrd~~wand
I37
"Rordwy lnpmvemnr" rha0 h v e UIC m
nudcapathersof
138
"Draw Period" m a m u f i & e n (IS) day, &r Mufh 3 I* J
m 30*, Ssptsmber
bnhn3.2(a)kbw.
m wl bnh h 3 k b w .
"Rosd I m p m m d P a p R Connrnsstmd Date"rha0 have thc manhg set bnh n
3.1 k b w .
"ibwhvay lmpmwmn CornmSWhave thc nrYiRgs t bnh n 3.1 bsbw
3 C and nd~ecemkr3Ig, asdeserbed n 3.2.
139
1.9
"FiiY~rha0haveUIC~n4.6@).
1.40
S a k s Tax lncndiK PaymnI"sW h e thc ma&&sct b k h4.qa).
1.10
'Grocsflornrcnl Phue" rha0 h v e thc mcvlilg 4 6 n h n thc PIID Appkahn
1.41
S a k s Tax P a w n C o m m c e m n Datc"sW have thc e
Pa)msm"shallhaveIhcman@sd
b1m4.1 kbw.
1.11
1.12
tb
x
1 h4.6(a).
ARTICLE 11
InnPhus"rtnlhavethc&xtbnhbthcPUDApp~n.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCIlON OF LANE PARKE
2.1
Design and Constmcfon Rclating to the PmjecL Subjcstm thc pmviiom
herciwkr set 6 4 thc COMPANY rhg a b wst, k rcspombk b r d c m k i a n d wnpL:@
d n k g , &ti&
s i d m d s , p d r , gtesmva)~and othcr hnpmwmm neccssay W
JrchaEoM crlgirerig and othcr dcs* \ \ v k ((irM6lg prcparatDn o f & W p h , specibtbns,
p m d c 'ihmchue W ruppon thc Pmjsu, uhkh am m r c pm'cuhrlyxt bnh on
and draw*
Edubi "8"aUackdh e m and mads a pad k m f
auoshled hnpmvemm), as wcl as w l l m u b n ofthc Pmjojssf is Lane Pakc l n h t ~ ~ t m c
p4
Inpmwmld5 and otf-ske irpmvemfi, mcelrhrsd by thc Pmjcct k M & b a not lnicdto
?4
Pa+ R o d lnymvemm" shall have thc &x t h n h h 3.2(a) bcbw.
1.15
W thc Pm&g
thc Lans Parks lnfta5mrouc lmpmwmrts. hndscape and
1.16
l.cndcSsklhaw UIC m m h g x l b n h m 6.9 k b w .
wnmuctDn of pubk mads, r m m a t s r ihstwmc, b t a b h n ofsidmaks, unb and m r ,
1.17
W& Tax lncentic Pa)mn"rhal haw thc ma+w b n h b 4.7 bcbwv.
hndscapbts parks, parkitg and othcr hnpmwmntr stow n or on& Pmject P h (as d c k d
bcbw).
.
In w d n the*
thc COMPANY M sesurc any and all rsquircd gowmmsnnl or
Dcrcbpnrnt Agmnrnt k t u u n
Cay ofMovauin BmokErson.lne..nd
a n * # k a h y anp.ny. UT
1.21
"MMrmy Saks Tax k w n e " m;uu an m m t c q u a l m thc sakr o x r c w m w l k t s d
lepmtc appmmh t h may k quirsd by thc Ciy, and nomthilg hers. rha0 k wnmusd as a w a k r
bythc C j . L m a l l & a s W o n t h c
ofsuch rsquicmm. Mors particuhrfy,thc Pmjm shall k d w w , w t w m c d , and dmbpcd n
P m p g n a n y m h b h ~ t h Pmjsa
c
and mdsnak+
q p W n b r a PUD flkl wih thc Ciyon Apd 20,2012 CPUD Applka1bn3 and a p p m d by Ciy
C i o f M o m & Bmak which 8 eunsmIy26.1 nib.
C o m a O d k n c c N h r 1871. Thc appmvsd PUD App6cationand r s W tr&liabnrc
~ K~
c w n em
" a m h t~
M I I
by the C i a n d generated by ~ 8 1&
1 L m any e
ofsaks ox r e w w wbstcd
o
n thc P m p c g in cxceo of
thc &she SatsTax Revenue
incaporated hercn by ~ctrcnceand are hercia&r w ~ l y d e s e n b e dand rstned m k r c h as tk
"Project Phm."
2.2
-
C o m t ~ c t i o nand Conveyance olStonn Water Drainage lnlnsmcturc. As a
1.22
"Net P m p g Ad Vabrem Tax RRenr*SWh v e h e man@ set b n h n 4.8 k b w .
pad ofand m c o j u r t o n wih thc wnmuctDn ofthc Pmjcd, thc COMPANY W at b wst, d c s i i
1.21
'Net Tax Rcwnue"rhalhave UIC ma+ 4 b n h b4.2 k b w .
w~and~anomafsrd+r)stemnlccordarrswththcProjsctPhm.
haw thc mulblgset b n h h 6.8 kbwv.
1.24
Psnniued -sin!
1.25
"Psmhred k w i "d d haw thc
4
congood h tlut c e m i
M u n i s i PmpgTo*cr" shall m a n thc general 6trd mnicpal ad Mbrsm lax Tor thc
"Na ~ u n i s p sSl a b T
&
PI
bvcbpmnt Agrrrmnl k t u u n
(fly olMountam BrmkErson.Inc. and
a n i l R u h y ~onp.ny.uc
,
x w d v r c udh UIC phm, s p e c ~ mdn*,
1.20
6
r c w y approval and p c d q u i c d Tor I k Pmjcn and ~ h I c dhnpmvemm, kldi any such
Saks Tax k w w , as & w o n W
i
I9
'
.
1.19
R
set bnh n 6.8 kbwv.
1.26
P&"
1.27
Pmja'shdhave the m v l i l g x l b n h nmC k c t a b .
rtnlhved~~mat'vgxtfbvhinme
PUD App6caton.
1.28
P m j a O p a i g m u m I k ope*
r)aemsklkdsrignd,wmhu;tcd,and~dlotlutilmaykie&iaothcpubBd~
lynanofthc C i . Upon compktionofthc sIormwaPsrdraiegsMtq UIC COMPANY agma In
m t r or wnwy to UIC Ciy by deed or o
portom o f h d-
b r b m k m ofany P&
o f k Pmjeq othcr
Thcd-
t
rymm ( i r l d h g h -ntor
h
c
r
+-of-way
a
p
w-sad
p
m
p
p
-and
hnpmm~uor~thuarcapanthsmfhtnrcpanofthcDsdWRmhlnhmsWc
andooldlixdonExhibiIT"andTI".
1.29
Pmjsct Phm"sWhave thc &4 61th in 2.1 k b w .
1.30
PmpgTaxlncsr6vc Pa,rmdsWhwthc
23
manbgrtbnhm4.8 k b w .
R o a h y Impmvements.
(a) P ~ m d I C I c m a n d p ~ ~ m w ~ n t h c P m j a l P I a n M d a s p M o f a n d n
1.31
PmpltyTaxlncsnIi~P a ) m d Dats"Mha= UIC manhgscIfinh n 4.8 k b w .
sonjme3n wirh thc wmmrtiDn ofthc Pmjsu, tk COMPANY wil wnrrmct PubB and Private
1.32
P v b b Road Pa)msn Pmtowr SWhavs thc nranilgset 6 n h n 3.2(a) k b w .
Roads, as dcmikd n thc Pmjca P h .
1.33
PUD A p p W n " drill haw thc m+
6
set b n h n 2.1 k b w .
Dcrcbpmnt A ~ m m nktt u t u n
b v ~ b p m l A 8 m m nkl h m n
Cdy ofMounuin Book Erson. 1°C. and
(fly ofMount.in h k B s o n . In=. and
Lhnklk.hy Conp.ny.UT
hnLIRully Conpany.U
WCSBHMUIa-\
J:\Minutes & Agendas\Council\2012\20120730Minutes.doc
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
(b)
It b d
c
d and a p e d all t k roads idcnifrd as Pubb Roads h thc duly a p p m d
Pmjen Phm and amy cyemm or ri@s-oPnay m o k d thcrewih ac to be w m m r k d as p h b
mwis n acwrdansc HilhCky ItYdUds and ba&ncd
or d
d
i to h C i upon fmlwmpkton
Cdvcr Road ImpmvemnIs. Th:C i y w l l p a y h COMPANY t k m o f f i
@)
Hudrcd lhourand Dolhrr (SSW,W0.00) for wmptton ofbadway lnpmmncm to Cuhcr Road
DedicatedPutdic 1nhshucNm. Affertk w m f n r m n o f t k Dsdkakd Pubk
lmhOWwc 6 wmpkkd
inacwidanss Hilhodienccs, hws, ntks, and re@nr
(Tuhcr Pnad lnpmwmm") as nnrs 6dly sct b n h n t k Pmjcn P h . Th:Ciy wiO pay thc
ofthc Ciy, as
COMPANY fir t k Cuhcr Road Inpmwmnr st 4Draw Pcmd a n u m m e q d w thc
w s U as,to thc c a m a p p b b t , o t k r applicablejllradim, tk COMPANY ;lgrses to &ror
w m y to h Ciy, by deed. WIsmnt or such o
t
nand to t k Dcdiiakd Pubb huiamam \\&a
nasornbk hrr &r rcqvst by tk C i . Fmm
k
r
a
p
p
m
al t k tins o f t k fmlpa)nrnt
b r t k wnpkton o f t k LMS Pad Road Lnpmwmm ( W b Road P a w Pmtxol").
pytr of& Pmjcaars pmporcd to be prirate mads, and arc so idcr66sd in t k
Pmjen Phm.
2.4
to re& 6.e percent (5%)
torsncasa~Castaimge"). lkRs~wllk@totkCOMPANY,abwwvthtk
b a k e o f t k Onc M&n D o h (SI,OOO,OOOOOOO)
h b 0-5
thereof lk COMPANY and thc City a c k m w k d ~h tk ~ m n d s l ) mads
.
and o t k r a u r r r
w n i i o n sc*
k e n p e r b o n d h acwtdvrc w i h tk Pmjcn Phm and t k p c r c e w o f t k work Psl ha, k e n
pmpnly compkkd. Fmm each p m p u pa)nrnt, h e C i wll be c&d
p
p
pcrce*
ofwork h ha, been pmprty wmpkkd, as cc&
n t k tmnncr abow, ntutpM by
FiK Hundred Thourand D o h 3 (S500.000.00) kss t k I h i m g C . lk COMPANY d m t a y t k
and &rthc dakoftkmnve)ancctotk Ciyofthc DedicJOd Pubk Infnmuc~us,tkCiagrecs
Cty whcn wmttwjon wmmncu. Once wllrmEton wmncnm, and fib*
to acccpt a r h dcdiwton and w m c ) m x and a arnm:resport&&@ and wnlml b r thc &mnse,
lnpmwmnt P o w Comncncemnt Dak,tk City d p a y the COMPANY b r t k Cuhcr Road
r e p a i d pmper h & + o f t k
Lkdicafed P h b Infrartnron, bld m y dckr such acceplam and
Inpmwmms h xcordvrc wih, and in tk sum I ~ M F ~as thcy pay tk COMPANY b r t k LUT
asanpton d a h r t k wmpkbn o f t k C h c e r y i C o m n h l Plnsc and tk &fail Phue. lk Ciy
P d Road Impmwmm
may request thc ww)ance o f t k Dsdicdkd P h k ln6asbudve in onc or nnre wnvs)ures
lnpmwmm.
A R n C L E 111
(c)
PAYMENT OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COSTS
3.1
i q m w m m to or wmtwton of&
thc Pubk Road P a ) M Pmtxolhr thc C k r Road
3.t
Jemison Lane lmpmvemnts. lk C i w i l p a y thc COMPANY t k mofTwv0
M l b l Fhc H d n d Thourand D o h (S2.500,0WW00)f o r k wRmu:ton and h9 wmphbnof
Roadway lmprovcmnt Coltr. lk Ciy;rllrrssto pay to t k COMPANY Four
h l & n D o h (54,OOO.OW.W) ( l b d \ n y Impmwma Cosk")
t k Road
tk Purclnsc Pricc b r
W
leuison lane, as more MIy scl bnh in t k Pmjca Phm Clcmiron Lan:lnpmwmsm") C i \ 4 pay &
lk COMPANY b r tk lcmiron Lan:Lnpmvemm at cach t h t v Pcmd an u m u l qd to tk
Park Road, Cuhtr Road and lcmiron Lur (%adway
percenege ofwork h ha, bccn pmpcrty wmpkkd, as cx&d
n thc m m r abow, mukipEd by
Dcvcbpnmt A # m n r n t kt-="
Cay orMount.in h o k Evnm. Ins. and
h n k l RrsUy Conpany. uc
LnpmwmcRI"). Thc Roadmy Inpmwmsnr arc d c r W m h P m j d Phm. Th:Roadway
Two M&n F i Hundred Thousnnd D o h (S2,SM),OW.00) k u tho Rc&agc.
Inpmvems Cornn i l k pad breach ofths Qst s p a n k madnay pmjcN nths m u m s
wdl mlifyths C i w h n wmttwjon w m n c m s . Once sonmucbn wmmccs, and fibwit3 lk
lk COMPANY
d c s w m 3.2(a), @)and (c). lk Roadwvay lnpmvcmm Com k h d c , amow o t k r ikna,
Rnad Impmvwrnt P a m Comncmmcnl Dak, the C i wll pay& COMPANY b r t k lcmiron
paynrnt fir d ibz &nubion w m , ceren Lane PYkc InfnmucDve Lnpmwmsm and Dcdicdkd
LanslmpmwmnUh~ssotd~~wih,andmthcramc~rasthcypaytkCOMPANY
6rtk
u M arc pad o f k Roadnay l n p m w m n r hiths pa>-
Pubk-1
work r s W to t k huahlbn of*s.
do mt i r l d 5
LMS Pad Road Lnpmwmsm *tk
P h k Road Paymcnt P m w l b r t k leuison LYT
lk Roadway lmpmwmm C O Nd be pad ht k rnune~
and on t k km and p m h u m bcbw \ \ h n at hitweny-6.e per cent (25%) o f t k rhcll b d i i
33
Inspeclion of Records. Upon r c q a b m h Ciy, t k Ciyrhallk pmded, to ths
wllrmEtonand rslatcd sic work fir eaCr ths GmceyKonuncrcdP k s or ths itmilP k s 8
c r d c n s q r e s s l y u r d c r ~wmml and d ' n o f t k COMPANY, reawmbb acau to appmpriatc
wmpkkd, as wbmtlsd by thc COMPANY, wriScd by h e COMPANY'S a r c h k t orcngirer of
and nccusaty rewrdsofthc COMPANY, n & s M , orotkr penom. 6mn, ore&s
rswtd, and WM
by t k City W a d Inpmwmnt Paymcnt Comnemmnt Dak").
rehkd m tk Pubb Road Pmjca
3.1
Roadmy lmpmv+mentr.
(a)
Lane Pa* R o r d l m p m m n t r . lk Ciywinpay thc COMPANY the s m o f O n c
3.4
MimonDDh(SI,OOO,OOO.OO)b r t k wmpkbnofRoadway Lnpmwmmto LMS Park Road
d
m
Roadmy lmpmvemnts. Thc C i a p e s Psl tk Pnadway Lnpmvemm
dcscnkd m 3.2(a), @), and (c) abow w m a i a p o h n o f t k LYT P d e I n b t m a m Impmwmm
and tk Dsdixkd Pubb Inhdmchuc, and P s l t k 6 i a n d m m b k
ofthc nbow re~rsnosd
Road\\ay lnpmwmcms is m czcss ofFour hl&n D o h (54,OM),W0.00). lk pwdslc price b r
COMPANY b r t k Lane PYk Road Lnpmwmsrm atcach Draw Pcmd ~ a n w ~ l r d c q dt m
k
p
e
w ofwok Pslha, bccnpmpcdy wmpkkd, as ce&
intk m
r bcbwv, -!id
tk wmphbnofcachdwipakd wmponcntoftk Roadway ImpmwmcRI
by
O r r Mildim D o h 3 (Sl.WO.OO0.W) Isu ths RcOiags (as defmd k b w ) . Thc COMPANY \vil
mtay t k Ciy whsn wmewtbn w m n m . Oncs wmrmclon w r m m a s , and
fob^ t k Road
Impmwnm P a p a t Commcctrcnt Dak. tk C i wll pay tk COMPANY Y cach Draw Pcmd
fobw+gdcIk~yby ths COMPANY 10 ths C ' i of a
tk gcncnl w m M o r pb+tk
cedfcalim 6 u m h COMPANY and
Lan:PYk Road lmpmwmms cen3jkg bod! Psl tk work ha,
Lkrcbpmnt A p m m n t k t u r s n
Cay ofhiovnuin hok.Evnon.lns. snd
m n k l ~ r a k -BY.
y
uc
k payabk n
accordance n* and suljcct to tk e m , w d i m , and M a l b m sct 6 n h h sulpamgmphr3.2(a)
thmu& (c) nbow. AO w n ~ ) a n c e os f t k Roadway h p r n m m w tk City d d k by appmprbk
deed, c a m * or such o t k r intMncm as may k reasonably quid by t k Cky.
35
Maintenance rod Repair. lk Citywilbe o b w to =pair d o r & t k
Public Roads (as d e k d i n t k PmjcaPhm)hcJled w v i h t k C i o f M o m a i , Bmok wkkhhaw
b c c n d c d i i d to and accepkd by t k Cty and which k L d e tk Roadway Impmwmm, as w s O as
R v c b p m n l A l m m n t bcm-n
City orMounl.in I f w k Evaon.Ins. snd
h n L I RnUy Conpsny. LLC
July 30,2012
&
4
Minute Book 84
the D s d i i Pub& h f m ~ ~ h l rtoe the
, e b m bcatcd in tho Cily. llc COMPANY assums thc
rcwmbiSryto =pair &or -the
hnd~wp.hgabpg the md\\a,,
\I*
thc Pmjcq
\\trther
(b)
llc S l s Tax I n s h e Pa)men wd k pad by thc Ciy on a mr&j bub. \\*the
W pa)mcnI m emu by the I5*ofhe m m h adcrthe W 6d. mmh hlbwilg the S*s Tax P a p a
public or private, to repair ad nni~fai~
P h badua),, u debrd b thc P m k d Pbm, or any other
Comremmsn DYC,with sash subscqwn p a p e n to occw on the IS* ofeach m m h t h e d r .
mad\\a)s w16ch uc m t d e d k I d ID ad a~cspIcdby UIC Ciy.
~ h saks
s
ARTICLE IV
ADDITIONAL INCENTIVES
4.1
P a p a wa k wlnhDd by s u b u m h g ~ ~o~ d ~ ya r s saks
k Tax
q w !hum(9by Dosty pnssm (90%) ud
the COMPANY rasivcs up to Onc MZbn ad n d 0 D o h (SI.WO.OW.00) o f S l s Tax kche
T e r n 8nd Conditionr. In%ldionm the p a y m a 6 r I k b a d w y lmpmwmm
p m d e d for n Arficlc Ill ofhis *
a
ax kc&
Rsvclu:b m thc Mod$'SSas Tax Rcvsmr ad
PaynrnU h any Facal Year and (9m&b+
hat ~lnn
by scmdy-fw pcr cea (75%) b m and &I
the r a s p 1 by thc COMPANY o f O n M h a d no1100 D o h (SI,WO,WO.W)ofSaksTax
ad as liudxr i d w m c n to the COMPANY fir
lm&
P a w m . W& 30 dayr adcr the md of& firR I2 I
U
lmmln o f p a p a of& Saks Tax
m o l d not to e m d Ur m l d o f T e n MEbn Doltrn (110,000,000.00) n conridenton B r a d u
Inss&
Pa)mcm, ad breach I2 m& UIC&r
an ndvcmrm brthc COMPANY'S a m m a lo uderta)le the Lans Pukc h5amum
wd &uBk the exact m u d ofNm M e p a l S l s Tax Rcmuw m
lmpmwnrrer ad the devsbpmcnofthe Pmpcny in aeeordarrsw i h thc PmjccI Phm ad ndUIC
FiwalYcarad,wihi~I5 daythemdcr, Citywillpay the C 0 M P A N Y u y r h o ~ i n t k p a ) m : m o f
mnpkton ofthe LMP d e ldiasmcm Impmwnrr+r. thc C i slnn pay thc COMPANY m
the S a t s Tax I m &
4.2
Calculation of the Incentive Plymenb. llc mul o f h kc& Pa)merr m be
e
the Pmjea
ifw F o r k ptnposcs ofhis A p c n e ~ &"Nct Tax Rcvsw" ~
c o h i o m by thc Ciy b m (9
thc Pmject, (i)bd&
saks h*cs
lspr gencmkd withi thc
fiumthe Pmpcny, Isu b bye&
T W rSs w w
the Fbcal Year to the Ciy.
Lodging Tax Revenue. Unkss oUICnvkc agiccd n wiiq by UIC parties, thc Cay
slnnrsmilto the COMPANY by thc 15Uofcachmmhadcr the s u b d l wmphtonofaP
b m or gcnemd by sales ncMks \*
Pmject. ad (9m i c i p d pmpcny faxcs jpmxed
m l l l m ofthosc rcrpccriK oxcs c m d y cobclsd by UIC C i ,
debrd h 4 . 6 a d 4 . 8 k b w a d r s M o n E x h b i ' r ) ' :
4.1
W by h e Ciy fir said
P q m m b r such FkalYur, or comra'ly, UIC COMPANY wilrsni~any
m p a y ~ ~ en m
u y L\Ewcend d*
paid to dc COMPANY by b C i M b e falcuhlcd bascd uponNn Tax R e w w gmratsd b m
p i w a l Year"), UIC Ciy and the COMPANY
inpmvmmtr &the
Inn P h h an m u d equal a nirty pcrrrm (90%) ofany m i c i i b d h
arswlu:pmdbmbd&~onUICPmpcnyand~)LnedbythcCiyd~the
prnsdixg mnth ("lad&Tax
l l c m o l n t o f t h e lncs&PspRIwiU
4.8
lnx&
W
Pa)mcnt").
CIIYPmptly T u Revenue. Unkn othcnvk w e d n \**by
thc &s,
thc
k4
C i Mpay to the COMPANY ananmud qual to UIC Net PmpsnyM Vabrcm Tax Rcwne Tor
4.3
Permit Fees. Thc C i d receive ad &a0 pcnnk6x~gcmmtedkdb m t h e
all Pmpcny b thc Pmjen (the P m p c w Tax I
d Paw*.
For pwposcs ofhis Agrssmrq
"Net Pmpcny M Vabrcm Tax RCIFRT"meam the m u d by \VhiCh the Mmkpd Pmpcny Tapes
Tax RSKRIC.
4.4
rcceivEdbytheCiwsdtheBucbPmpcnyTaxRcvsw.B c e d h U I C g x ) c a r
Conrtmction L l e s TU Fees. l h c City will recek ad rsmhalslcr taxgem&
m m m b l g o n O a o b e r 1,2013, thc COMPANY d s y n a d t h c Citywilsccneand swmw, if
b m the c o a t o n o f h Pmjca ad d nrh revsmc \Abe exsbicd b m thc calcuhtonofNct
wmsd by thc COMPANY, thc Props@ Tnx Inec&
Tax Rcvsm.
ossupaxy Brthe Rssids&l Phase bu the City b m t o b b k d to m m n c c p a p a ofthe Pmpeny
43
School Taxes. 'h lhc c d d l d ad vabrsm gxad aq m d i ad vdbrcm
ti*ss wikh M c x p r ~ n ) y d dtoi thc ~ o u n t a ~a m o k
Schooh or to p m a i pube
Pa)mnadcr rcce*ofaartiti;ue
of
Tax lnccdw P a w uR1 !he Snlw Tax P a w C o m n x m n Datc. WLhiten (10) dayr lflsr
the Cii e k s m k b m h e COMPANY ofthc Saks Tax P a ~ m nConmsmment
t
DYC,any
adalle~rowsd~\~kp~mthcCOMPANYadUICMmrthePmpsltyTaxInech
Taxcs ad Nct PmpcnyM Vabrcm Tax R c w w . Thc Mou~mhBrook City Board ofEducaton
P a ) m m w i l k paid m thc COMPANY onor k b r c Febnary I ofcachyar("PmpsnyTax
rhal ~ i v ad
c &o m - h n d d pcnxn(100%) ofthe S c b l Ta*~rgem&
Im&
4.6
by the Pmjed
P a ) n m Date") In the mncUnIthc Saks Tax Pa)&
Con~~~nxm
Datc
c ad m m t
S8ks T u Revenue.
h?Y h n u m v b u ~ A ~ m c ~ r s ~ m b ~ a d c & d o n U I C k m k r s n
b m ad adcrthe c o m r r s m c n ofany rstailsaks b m b m b s e opt*
~
in ethsr the
Omss~$omrehl Phase or UIC Rstail P l u s (Saks Tax Payncn C o m m a DYC"). an
4.9
No Finance Ch.rge or lntcrsst. Eweptas othcnvDc a t 6 I t h k r s i w i ~ ~ r c s t ,
mmegual to n k t y pcnxrt (90%) ofany N n M l n i c i Saks Tnx RCIFRTCOW
by UIC C i
~shugc,orfimnac~of~k~rhalncenrorknddedmtheprir'palm~duthe
d t h e COMPANY lscsivcsOnc M i b n d m / 1 0 0 D o h (I,WO,00OO0O)
OanyFbcalYur(u
COMPANY by thc C i uderthe o m ofhis Agrumcm
defined k b w ) ad an m u d qual to s e w n p f w pcr cen (75%) ofany Net M d p d Saks Tax
R c w m eohetcd by the Ciy b m ad aEcr thc poil h e COMPANY hsr rcceiKd Onc W
n
D o h (11,000,000.00) b any FkaI Ycar ('Sah Tax l r r c h P a y m a ' llc Saks Tax h u d w
I4
4.10
Suitable Fa Mattrid. ~finhcridussnsrtadtoassiatkC i y h t h e ~ n o f
br o b w m y s o s h d ndh e Agrument fir Seniccs Agrewrm (7mA g n c m " )
UIC
B i i Z o o , Ins., thc CitykrrbygrdnU the COMPANYthc r& bu m I k ob-n,
w
R v c b p m l A a l s c m l bclurrn
c i ~ yorMovntlin Bmor Eraon.lnc. and
bnklllr.ily Conpany. UC
WCLinHMUIUUDUn
J:\Minutes & Agendas\Council\2012\20120730Minutesdoc
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Illfor t k P m j e c u detsmbrd by h e COMPANY On or beforc Sepkmber I, 2016, the
COMPANY dm e thc C ' i , m \*
z h n t k COMPANY m b
~ h n rd r to r e m w any of
Governing Law. lhk AgrcementsM be p v s d by the hw o f t k Scue of
6.4
Ahbm. N o w m thk Agn%mn dd be dcemd or wmmed to rebvs or exempt t k
COMPANY or L assigns b m Tun ~npEanctwim any appkabk o d i u m or rc@n
adopted by
COMPANY,thc Ciyand thc COMPANYrempkthrtthc COMPANY knotapnnytothe Zoo
t h e C t y , ~ ~ t h e C i y ~ r D t t o ~ a n y o d i u m o r ~
Agreemrt lk COMPANY Aal hnher be rewnsibk for d acfirirics nhted to r e m d ad
w a n d obbtions ofeach paq lrder mb M r n m .
tnmponaton ofthc M a m b , uldi any
to pspsrr or property resukbg b m lhox
The COMPANY s M hnherqm. to execute an access qm.mm or other k e istnmznl
&s.
a r m y be rrqmtd by the Zoo as a m d i n ofsuch m m d aeti\iics.
Entim Agreemnr 'Ihb Agrsomd and the E h b i tlnf ars aPaskd hereto or
66
iwrporated k m n by rcbrcncc m
h tk entire *mmt
m
n
g t k @s
hereto psnaihg to
the subject lmtter hsreof s l p s d c any and d pmror wrtsmporarcola agmmm or udertal;ilgr
ARTICLE V
ofthc p a r k r e e to the sub*
lmtter krcof and may rot be modikd or smcnded exceptby a
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
5.1
Repmrent.tiom and Warnutics orthe City. lk C t y d e s tk f i b \ %
rcprcxnfations and wanamis as the barb fir b u d e r n k i i pus& m thk Agreema
(a)
lke~nandde~ryofmbA~mRonbpaRkukn&~bya
w
e or bc mmmrd to be a *M
orjoin wtmoc between the Ciy and the COMPANY
and their rcspcctiK a r s s l r o n and as+.
r e s o f i n dulyadopted by b C$ Couril and by aP o t k r neossszry actions, & W i t h o x in
amrdancc ndhAmmimed 772 ofthc CoratihdDn ofthe S!& ofAhbama
No Partnetship or Joint Venture. N o w m n W m thb Agmmnt dd
6.6
Counterparts. lhk Agn~mmtnnybe excucd incouuerpub, each whkhwkn so
6.7
c x e e l r c d M k d d t o b e a n o l i g i n l a n d a r h m u n a r p u b M t o ~ t h c r wbutoneand
~
C*l
t k r a m c ~ d
A p m m and to 6Wad cany ouf is o b w m krcwder.
5.2
6.8
Reprerent.tiom and Warnutics or the COMPANY. The COMPANY nmlru k
f o b z h rcprescr$aliom and warrYdEs ar thc barb fir b udemkilgr purr& to thk bema
(a)
b c h entky w n p r k i i thc COMPANY k o r g a d , exkhgand n p a d d o g
uderthc hwx ofthe S u e ofAhbam and regiuercd to conduct b u s h s m Ah-
ku the power
Assignment. ' I h b A p e r n n 5 and d o f t h e pm-m
hemS dd be bhiiiupon
d M ~ t o t k ~ l o f t h e ~ s h c r e t o a n d t h e i r r u p c & ~ n a n dlhk
~,
E
Agreurmtw be assbed by tk COMPANY, wihouthe wmsntofthe Ciy, if@ Lk i
2
mq~~thetemofthkAgrceme~~atthctins~ftheass~mand~~~tkb~+~
e m u c d eiher khvssntk c&s
whih w n p k thc COMPANY or any o f i i a&ues
Drrcbpmnl Almmnl b.,umn
Cey orMounum b o L Erson. lnc and
b n r l k s I ) Corrpany. U C
01
DsvrbpmnlAlmnenl klu-n
Cily orMounlninB w k E n o n . l n c .nd
hnkl Rally Coqmny. LU:
rubsidkks, or to an entity which k o z d n w b k or p
or
toanythhdpnnyn~on~~abngndhEmnMdlorDy6cIor~a&ues,aneg~ias~~a~or
;lgsnI, o&r,
6.1
mmgx o r p d *r
har k e n duly & k d .
("Perndtsd A s i i m " ) E q t for a P c m W Ass-
ARTICLE VI
COMPANY, or b Nceesson or ass&
GENERAL PROVISIONS
a p p m d dm t be llmsarombb *H,
Duntion Abxnt an early temnknim ofthk Agrcemen for w n s XI fo& k m k ,
any other &ptma
by tk
mm be a p p m d bythe C$Couriloftk C j : nhich
deta)d or m n d i l o d ("Appmvsd A s i i n t ? . In thc
svsd ofa P c m h J or Appmvsd A s i p m 1 5 the COMPANY will r e m h o b m uderthe t e r n
ofmb~mcn,lnlcsrcbrsdbythcC$.~C~~nmlrepaymmudsrthkAgrsomntto
the carter o f @ 20 )em b m thc Pmjed Openbg, (il 25 ) e m from tk EB:&
Date or (9pa)msnt
mrullofdm~~to~ksUIandNofthk~mmt~urMwmfin~
6.2
Pees and &psmes. &ch p q s M pay is onn cxpcmu n s o m c t o n n t h
thc COMPANY at the m k addres mrPJird n thk Apemen5 L,uJsu a e k s a wriflsn m t t c
s
m bythe COMPANY, o r t h c d r b y anyentiyappmvsd
a Pe&d
Asiintor
A p p m d A s s i i d (Nth ndiy b rcbmd to a, a "Pennkfed A u i " or "Appmwd A n i " )
negohIbn, e l e a t o k and c b s i g ofthk Agn%md or any agreement or k f n m m somnphted
LCyt ten (10) dayr nadvdncc o f a n y p a m d d c s i p h a new edty and/or d d r c s to which
hercn In w d n w i l h thc w n v c y ~ c cof Mk r c v d e r or @-of-nay
p a y m m hcmuder rho& be tmdc.
and other Dedicated
Pubk Inhsbuam, thc COMPANY, at iD rok eqxgsmc, sha4 ifrwsombiy requid, o b h a tit
imnamx poky or bider and prspars a s m y ofthe pmpsrty to be m m ) e d . EPspt ar nrpresly
6.9
CoUatenl Arsignmnb. C o m a oflhs CtyrhJ.Imtbc r r q a fir a n y w k t c d
assigntnemr ofthe COMPANY'S + m v d e r mb Agrscrnn to a knder ( W e t ' ) w b pm-
p m d c d k r e i any ncossaydced or other iummsnb rchred to such pubk mads and t@!s-oC\my
hmchg fir the Pmjsst to thc COMPANY or to a P e m k d w
shaU be p m p d by thc COMPANY.
Lnder dbe d
e or A p p m d A s i i . Such
d a P e d A s i i . lk COMPANY dp m d e wriflsn m k to tk Ciy
o f t k rruns. addrcs, ad mrracf iu%mWbnofany Lnder and copks ofthe C o k t c d h
mmpasm jurirdicton to be ilkgal or h 6 d for any mson zhakoewr, such pm*
SMbe sew&
C
paq rcosiw subsfad iih5lhn1 ofib bench kreuder.
i
m
d o e m b excc~Eedwim sad Lvder zhich p m d e s hami.1~fir thc Pmjcn In thc c w o f a
o
s~t d l not be~m b r s d b m b obligatiom uder thk m m n .
~ the COMPANY
d
6.10
B l o p p l Certilicatcs. Fmm bne to h,
upon qusst by any party, thc pnny asked
Dsrrbpmnl Agrrmnt k a = n
Cily ofMounUnn EmokEvson. Inc..nd
b n i c l R..lly Corrpmy. LLC
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Mpmvidc m the pany nukiithe r e q w an ackm\\lldgmcn or ccrti6catc \d~
rssprt m m
n
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, cach panykrcm hy a d thi Agecmnt m be duly erenaed
concsmhgthk A m m t o r t h e Whu ofpe&mnnx ofthe obi+yhrn o f h pyticr krcuder, as
m y bs reaponably rsqusaed.
6.11
as ofthe date wvriucn abow.
No ndId-Plr(y Beneliuarics. E w p t as a t d u d k r e i this A p m d b
a w o MOUNTAIN
~
BROOK.
paniss hcrcto, and m i k r lhb AgecmsnS nor any ofthe
h n d c d ody hDr the beme ofthe
an A l a h n u Municipal Corporation
ATTEST:
+Us,
i r s r s s t o r o b i g d h ~k r s d c r , h kded hrthe bcnefitofany otherpcnonorthbd pany.
6.12
Public Purpose. Plrrarunto Amsdmsnf No. 7 7 2 , h Ciy doer krcby f s e r t a h
debunk, dcchrs and 6nd h t udertdthg the gran ofpubkc Ws,
as descdxd here& 6 mthe best
h r s s t of !kCiy a d w d rem a pubb pltrposc and furlhsr e
b the public bsm61 and ~ \ e k c
by, anung other hhgs:pmmtbn of bcal ecomnir and m m r c h l d c w b p n r d and thc s t i m h b n
ofthe bcaleoommy, i K ~ c n p b ) m s d o p p o m~the
s C e , kirreyilgthe C Y r -base,
EVSON, INC., an Ahbama corpontion
ATTEST:
which w
d r e d ha d d i o d tax rewncs for the Ci; pmmthg the h t b q r c h t o c-vn
~
the acrthetk qmUy
BY
m the a m m i hwWlofthe C i . The Cky Ws milt thc abow-
Itr :
and rstcntDnofwmnsrchle~erpriKIhthe Cw, and, p r u c & g ad irpm*
o f w m r c h l dersbpmn, w
c h d itelm dlszrsns vdla ad &icd
pubb p w r e mtuilhrtanditg any k i d c d benc6t accruilg
to thc COMPANY or any other phatc c ~ o r c ~ .
6.13
f-4
Delruh. Upon the ossuncncc ofan c w d o f d c h k by a pany, which ii m t m d
DANIEL REALTYCOMPANY, LLC,
m Alabama limited liability company
by Daniel Realty Corporation, its Manager
wihb thirly (30) day1 &r \ntDn notice, the m n - d c e pany m y , h is dhemtoq take d
pvrrus any one or m r s ofthe hlb\\ilg remcdicr wiholdany no&
or denuni wfofrawr, other than
ATTEST:
4
ey:
rssk and o b e n yunivc r s L t or
Its:
Dsrcbpmnl Agmrrcnt k l w n
Cay olMoun1.m bok.Evion, Inc. and
h n i c l Rsahy Conpnny. U C
@)
1
Dcrcbpmml A#mmmt kt-n
Cow olMoun1.m bo!.
&ion.
lnc
and
b n r l h h y Conpany. LLC
tcnnkalerhb A p m e d p m r m C b r i g pmvidcd m s t t h e c w n t o f d c f i u h d ,
ad mtko ofthccwdofdtbvll h+~+ pmrto the C b i i or
(c)
crerck any and ailolher rsmsd'is a W b at hw or h cq*.
22
Dsrrbprrcnt Asm-nt k l u c m
Cay ofMountlin h o l ; Ermon. Inc. and
rnnirl~.hy c ~ w . ~ ~ . u c
Drrrbpmrnt A # e m n l bctnrcn
Czly orMounlau~
h o t Ermon.lnc and
b n r l h l yC0npny.U
DOCSI(HM\IUIlBNS\
J:Winutes & Agendas\CouncilU012\20120730Minutes.doc
W
&
any notice cxparrlypmvidcd for hrhb Apcmcnt
(a)
Ti
f)
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
STATEOFAWBAMA
JEFFERSON COUNTY
)
I. he m d e n b d h d y , a Notary Pvbb had for sail Cova). n sail Sote. klcby
scdfyh
.whose mms a,
0th C q o f
MOIUQII Bmk. a Muuspal CorpontiDn hhe State ofAhbum. b & lo tlr f o r g ~ wnmurr~
A pone1 of land baing aru8led in Iho Nonhcul quarla of h N o n h m
qvarmr and IIIE
SaulhDan quanu of& N h m t quMcr of S d m 8,
Tomllip 18 SOUL,Range 1Wcu, mnn paniwlmly d u n i h d ns rollom:
&gin at IIICSouthwat C o r n of tho Nonlwrt Quarter of lhc Noilhwl
Q
u
W of Seclim 8, Tomuhip I8 S m h , Raws 2 Wed; also bcii~gthe Poi111
oflcgilming; h s c run Notlhaly d m 8 h e Wcsl liuo of a i d Quprtu
Q U ~ Ua
o f 6 6 s . 1 ~f a ; a(;thm~dght 9 1 r 0 ~ 0 4 " nh n s c
1325.11 Lcl; lhcnw right IS+-58'-55-8 dixkuw of7422 fccl; thurodghi
37'-4Y-05" 8 dkmw of 736.41 f W k x x a right 52.46'-M" 0 d ' i m Of
62.37 fmc lhcl~ceright OW-14'-22" a distance of 179.92 feet; thence kA 90.58'-32" a dislance of 355.39 f a l ; lhcnec light 81*43'-2P'a d i m - 0124.53
fat: lhena left V-ZY-35"o distanceof 139.13 feet; then- right 89nZT4Y'
a distance of 14.61 b;
lhcncc I& llT-IO'-O(Y' a d i ~ n c of
c 175.92 IM;
lhcnec righl8P-32'-17" a distance d46.85 feel: thence l ~ g mlol n unvc lo
Ihc !dl llavlng a r d i u . of 1243.26 feel and a
d mglc of9'-20'-0YWong
Ihc a w e M qrc d i m m of202.U fccl: Ihcnm righl61'-49-52'' from Iha
langcnl ofanid curvca d i m = of 329.33 fc+l; Urncc langml lo a CIIW lo the
IcR luviup 8 wnl~alangle of L8m.0WW'aud a ndius of66.12 k l a u an
d i r h m 0120.79 fsch Ihcnm Ie1I2.-03'-OI"(o 010 IRII~CIII
ofa CUIYOIO Iba
loft iuving acenlml m~gloof34'-34'-36" d a mdiuiur of 60.77 feu, nn mo
d i h a of 36.67 fee(, Ihcacc continue h I k l ~ g mofraid
l
w cu
dialma 0145.64 f M lhenw righl90'40'40" a dirlnucm of 119.49 fn(;
d~cncadgh133.-29.36" n dialmw 01245.1 1 fm: lhmw dglu 0'-00'42" a
dlstwe of 377.82 feel lo the Point of Beeinning Snld I'areal mnlrh$27.59
nae~
more or lur.
-
Notary Pubh
My Conmkwn Eybcs:
STATE OF ALABAMA
)
JEFFERSON COUNTY
)
I. tlr udeniped h d y , a Nomy Pvbh had for sail C o w n sail Sote,krcby
celtayh
,\hosemmsar
o f E ~ s o Ins..
r ~ an
Ahbam wrpontD~&
b signsd to the bregokg imMncMand who a b a n to nr,dmwlcdged
kfore m on thir b y Llul, b c i i i & m d ofhe contents ofsail k l n t , k, a, NEhoEkerJnd
~vihfullllho~,cxd~ram:whmvilyforadarlk~~fsailwrpo~n.
Notary Pubh
My Conmkwn
Lkrrbpnm! Apmmrnl k t u e r n
Cily ofMounlun Rmok Evron. lnc and
IhnrlRuOy
STATEOFAWBAMA
)
JEFFERSON COUNTY
)
I, he u d e n b d h d y , a Notary Pubb h ad for sail Coudy h sail Sote,kreby
scrtayhal
,whoxmar
01Dvlicl
kab Corponbbw a wrporafon, lk Manylsr of Dvlicl Re& Company. LLC, an A W a m k k d
IhbW company, b s i p d to tlr foregohg imMncd ad \\ho b k m a n 10 m, a h \ v M g c d k b r e
A. .+I
Conp.ny.UT
h r k Ro.d lmpmrmm(r
r R a d Cormmaim
a. Rudslripimg
r. 5lanSnrr
nronmk&yWk~~mrdoftlrwmc~oftlr~nt,k.u~chofficcradwthful
h*.
cxculcd lk same whady hor ad a,tlr act o f d Dank1 Renlly CorpontiD~a h hir
w c $ ar Mamgerofsail lnnLd bababildy company.
d. W l i u l fhnD.nk Rcknlion
r
1.
skk."h.
an- & sml~ u t i
Lud.apqIl.rbap. hscna LiW
MiuLFacr
b Cqinraing. k i p & M i
L C ~ ~ . I K Y
Notary Pubk
My Commission Eybss:
C amboll l....
r Rod Corvnrcrion
h SmiluySmr
r Slmnlnnr
+ Walm 1L~obladon
r. Flmr*al h
l Rsnkmd
tifib
OYIIPI a d Yum Puking
*b.t Orbing.
Y i i . I h . ~ &
Psmiu & Q-
l ~
L ~ ~ D u i m b T r n ~
I. CrnlinU.
Mmln S
t M
a. Rod c
m n
h SdWY S N I ~
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
t k r r b p n r n l A ~ r . r m n lbclucrn
City ofMounl.in Bwk Evson. Ins.snd
nniclRnny Conpnny. uc
July 30,2012
Wimh.y TenWk.: For 01.cumlon PurporssOnty
Lane Parke Redevelopment
City of Mountain B m k
Fiscal Impact Summary PUD Timeline ConservativeAllaway
-
.
.
I..
,
,
,
-
!
APPENDIX 2
Minute Book 84
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Retail Analysis
Of the
Proposed Development
Prepared
For the
BY:
Arthur W. Allaway PhD
Suzanna H. Allawa) M.A
Summer 2012
Retail Analysis of the Proposed Lane Parke of
Mountain Brook Village Development
Retail Analysis of the Proposed Lane Parke of
Mountain Brook Village Development
Summary of Findings
The objective of this research project has been to provide the City of Mountain Brook
with appropdate data and analysis necessary to evaluate the future tax revenue
potential which would be generated by the newly revised redevelopment Lane Parke of
Mountain Brook Wllage.
An initial evaluation of this redevelopment was undertaken during 2009. After
consideration, the property owners revlsed the plan to accommodate certain changes;
smaller retail footprints, elimination of office space, some redesign elements, and
other items which would provide consensus for all involved. Even with these changes,
we can find no evidence that the revenue forecasts projected by the developers of the
project are overstated. The developers have maintained a high standard of retail
recruitment which will bring retailers to the Birmingham market. We think that the
sales estimates generated by the Lane Parke a t Mounrain Bmok W a g e development
team are appropriate.
in actuality, of course, the success of the development as the high-end retail shopping
and lifestyle destination envisioned In the Lane Parke of Mountain Brook Village plan
continues to rely on the ability of the developers to attract and sign (1) an exciting and
appealing set of restaurants and fast Casual dining opportunities, certain of which are
not currently operating in the Birmingham market, and
(21specific 'brand name" boutique retailers also not currently operating in the
Birmingham market. In addition, the success of the developers during Phase i will
Introduction
This study contains the results of a detailed retail analysis of the proposed Lane Parke
of Mountain Bmok Village development which is intended to replace the Mountain
Brook Village Shopping Center and Park Lane Apartments. As described by the
developers. Lane Parke of Mountain Brook Village will be a m1xedw.e project that will
encompass 27 acres of retail and residential development with green spaces, walking
trails, and water features throughout the property. When complete, Lane Parke will
encompass approximately 160,000 square feet of retail space, a residential component
that includes apartments, a boutique hotel, and over 1.200 parking spaces. The
project is located 3 mlles from downtown Birmingham and sits adjacent to the
Birmingham Zoo and the Birmingham Botanical Gardens in the center of the most
affluent area of Alabama.
certainly have an impact on their ability to attract interesting and appealing tenants
into the remaining speculative spaces in Phase U.
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
2
Just as in the previous anal)sis, researchers were provided by city officials with two
additional years of monthly retail sales tax collection data from existing merchants in
Mountain Brwk VillagelMBV). Total sales revenue figures for each merchant for each
month were generated by expanding the tax dollars by the sales tax percentage.
Although some stores experienced increasing revenues and some experienced
decreasing revenues, the percentages were not outside the range of normal. The
estimated sales figures for each were averaged over the five years to dampen any short
run fluctuations.
National and regional sources of published data were updated to generate accurate
sales per square foot estimates and total store revenue estimates for the same or
similar businesses b) t)ye as a baseline for evaluation of existing merchants in MBV
and additlonal proposed merchants in the Lane Parke project.
Objectives
m e overall objective of this research project is to provide the City of Mountain Brook
with appropriate data and anal)sis necessary to evaluate the future tax revenue
potential which would be generated b) the newly redeveloped Lane Parke of Mountain
Brook Mllage.
Research Process Overview
Researchers first met with representatives in December 201 1 to discuss the various
changes in the project. Estimated square footage figures of the redeveloped center as
a whole and for prospective tenants, new square footages for existing tenants, and
other relevant data were somewhat fluid at that time. Over the course of the next few
months, changes in current tenant relocations, increasing and decreasing square
footages, and an overall change in the tenant mix came into discussion. As plans
began to solidify, a strong tenant mix emerged.
Annual reports, the 2008 Dollars and Cents of U.S. Shopping Centers, business
statistics databases, and company websltes were used to generate revenue estimates
Data from retail specialists working In or with retailers ln similar businesses in other
geographic areas were collected to generate sales per square foot estimates and other
insights relevant to new retail growth trends.
For consistency, we continued to enhance the profiles, store and category
configurations, determine the top category retailers, and explore other insights
provided by the leading upscale shopping centers in the nation. Addltional locations
were added as comparables for the Lane Parke ofMountain Bmok Village project.
Updated demographic and economic profiles of the population of the one, three, and
five mile market areas of hiountain Brook Village were generated for comparison with
areas surrounding sinular high-end retall centers.
Analysis of Existing Mountain Brook Village Businesses
The first analysis involves the llkellhood that the current tenants of Mountain Brook
Village will generate at least the same amount in retail sales levels in after the
renovation of the shopping center and the r~onfigurationof their retail space. T%ere
might be a small decrease In retail sales during a 'settling in" period for store owners.
product mix alterations, and other growth related matters.
We selected four retail businesses which have been active in the Village over the past 5
years and will Likely move into the new space a s the basis for our current tenant
analysis. Square footages were obtained directl) from city records in order to compute
accurate sales per square foot for each retailer.
After the redewlopment of Lane Parke of Mountain Brook Village, the estimated
square footages of these businesses are projected to total approximately 46.460
square feet.
Overall, these businesses which have formed the backbone of the existing MBV will
have significantly different footprints after their redevelopment as Lane Parke of
Mountain Brook Village. There is still every Indication that their ability to do business
will be enhanced by their new surroundings.
However, for them to successfully suppon their square footages while at the same
time increase sales revenues there will have to be a net increase in overall center
traffic. This will continue to be largely the role of the new businesses recruited to
draw consumers to the center.
Analysis of Speculative Retail Space
TO analyze the impact of the remainder of Phase I and Phase U prospective merchants
on the overall revenuegenerating potential of the Lane Parke ofMountain Bmok Village
redevelopment for Mountaln Bmok, the researchers relied on a combination of
sources. m e s e include:
1. The list of prospective tenants provided to us by the developers of the project.
2. Top retailers and other shopping center tenants nationally in each of the
categories which fit the development's criteria ln terms of square footage
requirements and upscale market target marketing.
3. Retailers currentl) doing business in what we considered the top shopping
centers in the region and in the nation whose market characteristics compared
to those of the Lane Parke development.
4. Upscale and moderate shopping centerswithin a 100 mile radius of Mountain
Brook whose current tenants include potential tenants targeted for possible
recruitment for Lane Parke.
July 30,2012
N
n
E
Minute Book 84
Our list of comparables included but h,as not limited to such upscale and moderately
upscale shopping centers as:
Lenox Square. Atlanta. Georgia
Phipps Plaza. Atlanta. Georgia
Waterside Shops. Naples. Florida
International Plaza. Tampa. Florida
Short Hills Mall. Short Hills. New Jersey
Highland Park Village. Dallas. Texas
The Quarry. Alamo Heights, San Antonio. Texas
Bridge Street Town Centre, Huntsville. Alabama
Short Pump Town Center. Richmond Virginia
Shops at Charleston Place and the Riviera. Charleston, South Carolina
King Street, Alexandria. Virginia
Ballantyne Village. Charlotte. North Carolina
Hillsboro Pike. Nashville. Tennessee
First, researchers studled prospective tenants for the speculative spaces in both Phase
I and Phase I1 of the Lane Parke development plan via Internet sites, annual reports,
and current locations. Where national sales per square foot figures for the retailers
were published or available, we have Included them In the tables below. We have also
includcd published figures for the
of retailer along with average square
footage for locations in similar Community and Super Community Shopping Centers
nationally.
No personal interviews were conducted during this analysis to determine site
preference a s per the developer's request.
Certain centers were considered as comparables even if they had much larger overall
square footages because of the number of their top-drawer retail tenants (largel) in
women's fashions and accessories). Others were included because of the upscale
market In which they exist. Bridge Street Town Centre was included In the original
review because of its similarity in 'vision" to Lane Parke at Mountain Brook Village and
the fact that it currently has as tenants certain targeted retailers who have no other
locations in Alabama. The second review of the development has expanded to include
North Carolina. South Carolina. Tennessee, and Virginia because of the uniqueness of
the tenant mix in several of these locations.
Summary of Findings
Breakdown of space:
32%of space will be occupied by current tenants Ln the current Mountaln Brook
Vilhge.
The developer will accommodate the needs of existing Mountain Brook Village
merchants who have chosen to locate in the Lane Parke development. Others who have
chosen not to relocate in this development may choose available properties in the
Village to maintain the connection with their customer base For those businesses
located in and around MBV, the introduction of new businesses into the market will
stimulate more auto and foot traffic to all of the Villages in Mountain Brook and may
create addltional opportunities for retailers.
14% of potendal retailers are currently
Ln the Binnlngham market.
A few of the potential retailers are currently operating in the Birmingham area.
The oppormnit, to locate In the newly developed Lane Parke will provide additional or
larger locations for these retailers and dining establishments. It will strengthen and
expand their customer base and provide a method of introduction for those
consumers who may not visit their current locations.
54% of potendal retailers will b e new to tbe Binnlngham area.
Wlth the introduction of new members to the Birmingham retail market, this
market continues to strengthen and attract more and more customers to the area
thereby giving Birmingham the addltional distinction as a unique retailing center. New
stores generally mean new or additional tax dollars to the area, and the City of
Mountain Brook should benefit from the introduction of these retailers.
Revenue Projections for Phase I and U
In addltion to accommodating the needs of existing Mountain Brook Village merchants,
the remainder of the Lane Parke Phase I redevelopment provides for several new
introductions into the Birmingham retail market in the remaining 29.682 square feet of
available space. These locations could become home to several new fast casual dining
and fashion retailers in the market. As in the previous report, no single businesses
would be a 'make-or.break" tenant, but would be counted on to contribute to the
overall performance and strength of the retail center. The success of Phase I will
provide a foundation toward securing new retailers to the area in Phase ll. The
following tables exhibit different growth scenarios for Phase I and 11. The proposed
tenant store names have been 'categorized" in order to maintain confidentialit). The
first table shows a very broad and generalized retail mix with natlonal averages for
categories such as Full Service Dining. Boutique Retail. Junior Anchors, etc. with an
average sales per squareloot of $358.
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
Retail Sales Per Square Foot a n d By Broad Retail Category
Natlonal Averages
Rrlontrdlmants
:ullScrvire Food
C.,".I
1.1,
:.st C.su.1
:a*, C.su.1
.
. .
Retail Growth Scenarios
The follou-ing three tables show conservative, moderate, and strong growth sales
estlmates. These growth rates illustrate an estlmate of 1326. 1437. and 1537 sales per
square foot, respectively. The conservative or minimum estimate was determined by
taking the proposed tenant and using the reported minimum retail sales for one or
more stores, determining the square footage for that location, and computing the sales
per square foot. The remaining moderate and strong growth estlmates were computed
In the same way Including the remaining inventory of that particular brand of store
located In the same region, determining their square footage, and computing the retail
sales based on information obtained through annual reports, subscrlptlon databases.
and other sources of published data about a particular retailer.
Speculative Retail Spaces for Phase I
The remaining speculative spaces should be easily leased with several unique dining
and retail experiences not currently located In the Birmingham market. The
development team has created a palette of shopping and dining opportunities that will
attract existing and new customers to the dwelopment. These stores used for this
computation were typically in smaller markets than Birmingham, but used In order to
show the estimated minimum sales per square foot.
However as stated in the earlier report, sales per square foot numbers for thls space
are likely to be less important than the message sent to the public and potential Phase
I1 tenants by who leases the space. As long as auto and foot traffic are constant, thls
Phase should surpass this estlmate quickly and easlly.
Notc: Duc to the fluidify ofthis project, these tables a r e based upon a straight
average as opposed to a weighted m m g e . Changes may occur in square footages
o r tenanl mix befom construction takes places, therefore, a m a i g h l average
provides a baseline measurement a t this time.
E d m m d S a i r r per Square Foot
1
I
I
I
I
437
1
I
I
July 30,2012
X
W
Minute Book 84
14
Speculative Retafl Spaces for Phase I1
On the other hand, moderatc and strong growth estimates illustrate just how
successful the de\'elopment can and should be with the right tenant mix. With
estimated retail sales of $437 and f 537, the development is well on its way to
becoming a landmark retail center. While discussions are currentl) ongoing with the
development team, attitudes and decisions can change. Phase ii can become the
hottest ticket in the southeast ulth new retailers in thc area A cavcat to this
estimation is the lack of children's apparel, shoes, gifts, and men's fashions. While
there is one true men's clothier, an anchor, and a retailer that services both men and
u'omen, an additional men's clothier and children's apparel would certainly enhance
this mix. Two possibilities lor children's apparel might be Crewcuts and CWDkids.
Results
Revenue Projections for Phase U
Full Service Restauants
Although Phase I of the Lane Parke redevelopment is important lor the ehisting
merchants of Mountain Brook Village and to set the tone for the rest of the
development to follow, Phase 11will be the key to success lor the new center. Luckily,
by Phase iI the economy should be improving and many retail merchants and
restaurants currently in -survival mode- mll again be looking lor opportunities to
expand.
One of the two most critical Qpes of new tenants for the Lane Parke project will be its
lull-service restaurants (the other being l w r y boutique retail). The 'right" full-service
restaurants have the potential to create an excellent image for a center, create a burz
that extends far beyond the boundaries of the market area, and bring potential
consumers near the retail shops even when they have no immediate intention of
shopping. The signing of one or more top restaurants which do not currently mist in
the Birmingham market wiU be a signal that the project is on the wa) to becoming a
major success.
Our research approach for Phase I1 prospective tenants mirrored the research
approach used to evaluate the tenants in the speculative retail areas of Phase 1. We
studied Internet sites, annual reports, and current W e s of locations for a range of
potential restaurants and retailers who might be likely tenants for Phase 11. We then
conducted interviews with representatives of or brokers for as many those restaurants
and retailers as possible, asking about expansion plans in general, the current
economic climate and its impact on expansion, interest in the Birmingham market in
general, and/or 'an upscale new retail development near Mountain Brook."
Fast Casual. Dessen/Snack, and Breakfast/Bakery/Cafe restauants
With respect to Fast Casual Dining and Breakfast/Bakery/CaR restaurants, there are
literally dozens to choose from, and there is no one 'make-or-break" brand name
necessary for the Lane Parke project. \Ve feel comfortable that the developers and
leasing specialists will be able to acquire appropriate tenants within this category anli
that national averages can be used to forecast sales levels and retail sales tax revenue.
Junior Anchor
A variety of configurations are possible for filling the two major Junior Anchor spaces
in the Lane Parke project. Obviously, the goal of the developers is to attract a homerun caliber tenant for at least one of the spaces, but a great deal of selling wtll be
involved in the current economy. The positive factors are the high income market
demographics surrounding the Lane Parke site and its access from US 280 and
downtown Birmingham. National sales per square foot figures for Women's Specialty
Clothing stores range from an average o f f 223 to an upper 11x4 figure o f f 610. Book
retailers are among the least productive retailers in terms of sales per square loot.
Electronics stores average $302 per square foot nationally, but the top 10%of
electronics stores average $407 per square foot.
July 30,2012
Minute Book 84
18
Lwcury Boutique
Conclusion
The ability of the developers of Lane Parke to secure the 'right" women's specialty
stores is likely to be very important to the success of the proposed development. To a
large degree, the 'upscaleness" of a shopping center is defined to a large extent by the
'upscaleness" of its women's stores. The brands that define high end women's
clothing and accessory fashions are well known to the women who live in the Mountain
Brook area and are the target consumers for the Lane Parke development.
The most problematic category for the proposed center appears to be in the area of
very hlgh end women's apparel options. While the current set of potential retail
tenants represent a very impressive set of women's apparel for the Birmingham area.
securing all of these would be quite ambitious.
The objective of this research project has been to provide the City of Mountain Brook
with appropriate data and analysis necessary to evaluate the future tax revenue
potential whlch would be generated by the newly redeveloped Lane Parke ofOlounrain
Bmok Village.
Based on our preliminary findings. we can find no evidence that the revenue forecasts
projected by the developers of the project are overstated.
in actuality, the success of the development as the high-end retail shopping and
lifestyle destination envisioned in the Lane Parke of Mountain Bmok Village plans is
likely to be most contingent on the abillty of the developers to attract (1) an excellent
set of full service restaurants, certain of whlch are not currently operating in the
Birmingham market, and (2) specific 'brand name" luxury boutlque retailers also not
currently operating in the Birmingham market. in addition, the success of the
developers in attracting interesting and appealing tenants into the speculative spaces
remaining in Phase I may be very important in setting the stage for Phase Ii.
The abllity of project developers to sign appropriate restaurants and luxury boutlques
will to a large extent determine the drawing power of the shopping center, the ability
of the existing Mountain Brook Village retailers to expand their markets and their total
sales revenues, the press coverage that will create an atmosphere of anticlpation for
the 'new" center, and the ability of the other retail and senlce operations to survive
and prosper.
hl
Rrhaps the most comparable shopping center to that which is envisioned by the
developers of Lane Parke would be Highland Park Village, in Hlghland Park, an
exclusive suburb of Dallas. Texas. Researchers ran the demographic and economic
characteristics of the one, three, and five mile radii market areas surrounding Highland
Park Village and Mountain Brook Village for 2012 population and demographlc
estimates. Although slightly smaller in total numbers than Highland Park's market, the
Mountain Brook Village trade area has numbers that are more similar than nearly any
other area in the South.
July 30,2012