Ministry of External Affairs
(CPV Division)
****
GUIDELINES FOR INDIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
FOR EXTRADITION OF FUGITIVES FROM ABROAD
(New Delhi, August 2015)
(Note: This information brochure is intended to provide broad guidance regarding
extradition procedures in India and should not be taken as authoritative legal advice)
What is Extradition?
Extradition is the delivery of a person by the authorities of the State where he or she is found
to the judicial authorities of another State where he or she is wanted for purposes of
prosecution or for the imposition or enforcement of a sentence.
A Request for Extradition can be initiated against a fugitive criminal who is formally accused
of, charged with, or convicted of an extradition offence.
‘Fugitive Criminal’ means a person who is accused or convicted of an extradition offence
within the jurisdiction of a foreign State and includes a person who, while in India, conspires,
attempts to commit or incites or participates as an accomplice in the commission of an
extradition offence in a foreign State.
Legislative Basis for Extradition in India
The Extradition Act 1962 provides India’s legislative basis for extradition. The Act
consolidated the law relating to the extradition of fugitive criminals from India to foreign
states. It was substantially modified by Act 66 of 1993.
The Government of India has entered into bilateral Extradition Treaties with many countries
to bring speed and efficiency to the process of extradition. Besides, India has entered into
extradition agreements and arrangements with some more countries. A database of such
treaties is available at http://www.mea.gov.in/treaty.htm. India has also entered into some
multilateral agreements that may provide legal authority for extradition. For extradition to and
from Commonwealth countries, the London Scheme of Extradition could provide the legal
basis, in the absence of specific bilateral treaties.
India is a party to the 1997 International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist
Bombings. This also provides a legal basis for Extradition in Terror Crimes.
In May 2011, the Indian Government ratified two UN Conventions - the United Nations
Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and the United Nations Convention against
Transnational Organised Crime (UNCTOC) and its three protocols. Article 16 of UNCTOC
can be used as a basis for extradition of fugitive criminals accused/convicted of offences that
are classified as Organized Crimes. While ratifying the Convention, Government of India
declared that “In pursuance of Article 16, paragraph 5(a) of the Convention, the Government
of India shall apply the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other
States Parties to the Convention.” Indian Law Enforcement Agencies can seek to make use of
the provisions of the convention accordingly. (The full text of UNCTOC is available at:
http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNTOC/Publications/TOC%20Convention/TOCeb
ook-e.pdf)
Countries with which India has Extradition Treaties/Arrangements
India can make an extradition request to any country. While India’s treaty partners have treaty
obligations to consider India’s requests, in the absence of a treaty, it is a matter for the foreign
country to consider, in accordance with its domestic laws and procedures, whether the
country can agree to India’s extradition request on the basis of an assurance of reciprocity.
Similarly, any country can make an extradition request to India.
The legal basis for Extradition with States with whom India does not have an Extradition
Treaty (“non-Treaty States”) is provided by Section 3(4) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962.
India has Extradition Treaties currently in force with the following Countries:
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Country
Belgium
Nepal
(Old Treaty)
Canada
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Bhutan
Hong Kong
USA
Russia
UAE
Uzbekistan
Spain
Turkey
Germany
Korea (ROK)
Mongolia
Tunisia
Bahrain
France
Oman
Year of Treaty
1958
1963
1987
1989
1993
1996
1997
1997
1999
2000
2000
2002
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
Text of Treaty
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Poland
South Africa
Bulgaria
Ukraine
Kuwait
Belarus
Mauritius
Portugal
Mexico
Tajikistan
Australia
Malaysia
Egypt
Saudi Arabia
Bangladesh
Vietnam
Chile
2005
2005
2006
2006
2007
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2011
2011
2012
2012
2013
2013
2015
India has Extradition Arrangements with the following Countries:
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Country
Sweden
Tanzania
Singapore
Papua New
Guinea
5. Sri Lanka
6. Fiji
7. Thailand
8. Italy
9. Croatia
10. Peru
Date
1963
1966
1972
1978
1978
1979
1982
2003
2011
2011
Designated Central Authority in India for Extradition Matters
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Government of India, is the Central Authority for
all incoming and outgoing requests for Extradition. CPV Division handles extradition matters
in the Ministry of External Affairs.
Who can make an Extradition Request to a Foreign Country
Requests for extradition on behalf of Republic of India can only be made by the Ministry of
External Affairs, Government of India, which formally submits the request for Extradition to
the requested State through diplomatic channels. Such requests are sent under the signature of
the Minister of External Affairs.
Extradition requests are sent to the Ministry of External Affairs for consideration by:
a) The State Government under whose territorial jurisdiction the alleged offence took place;
b) The Court of Law by whom the fugitive criminal located abroad is wanted;
c) Ministry of Home Affairs in respect of cases put together by investigating agencies (e.g.
CBI, NIA etc.)
Provisional Arrest Requests
In urgent cases, when it is believed that a fugitive criminal located in a particular jurisdiction
may flee that jurisdiction, India may request provisional arrest of the fugitive, pending
presentation of the formal extradition request.
A request for provisional arrest may be transmitted through diplomatic channels, through the
CPV Division of the Ministry of External Affairs. The facilities of the International Criminal
Police Organization (INTERPOL) may also be used to transmit such a request, through the
National Central Bureau of India, CBI, New Delhi.
Each extradition treaty specifies the documents required for a provisional arrest request and
also specifies the means by which a provisional arrest request must be made. The Police/Law
Enforcement Agency concerned in India, prepares the request for a provisional arrest and
sends it to the MEA, for onward transmission to the foreign country concerned.
India can make a provisional arrest request to any country. While India’s treaty partners have
treaty obligations to consider India’s requests, in the absence of a treaty, it is a matter for the
foreign country, in accordance with its domestic laws, to determine whether to arrest the
person according to India’s provisional arrest request.
Broadly, the following documents are required to be included in a provisional arrest request
to be sent to a foreign country:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
a statement justifying why the request is urgent;
a physical description of the person, including his/her nationality, his/her photograph
and his/her fingerprints, if available, a list of the offences for which the person’s
arrest is sought;
the location of the person sought, if known;
a brief statement of the facts of the case, including, if possible, the time and location of
the offence;
a brief description of the offences committed by the fugitive and availability of prima
facie evidence against him;
A prima facie case "means at first blush or at first sight, a complete case against the
accused... in order to prove a prima facie case, there must be evidence, direct or
circumstantial, on each element." Establishing a prima facie case would essentially require:
a)
b)
c)
a copy of the legal provision(s) setting out the offence(s) and the penalty for the
offence(s);
a statement of the existence of a warrant of arrest or a finding of guilt or judgment of
conviction against the person sought; a copy of the warrant issued by the Court of law
in India for the person’s arrest may have to be enclosed; and
a statement that if the person is provisionally arrested, India will seek the person’s
extradition within the period required by that country’s law.
Extradition Offences
Extradition offence means
(i)
in relation to a foreign State, being a treaty State, an offence provided for in the
extradition treaty with that State;
(ii)
in relation to a foreign State other than a treaty State, an offence punishable with
imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year under the laws of India or of a
foreign State, and includes a composite offence. (Section 2(c) of Extradition Act, 1962)
Procedure for Extradition of a Fugitive Criminal
(from a Foreign Country to India)
Documents to be attached with a Formal Extradition Request
A sworn self-contained affidavit or solemn declaration by a Senior Officer in-charge of the
case (not below the rank of Superintendent of Police of the concerned investigating
agency), sworn before a Judicial Magistrate of the Court by which the accused is wanted for
prosecution, should be the main document in support of the extradition request. This should
be in the form of a detailed narrative that provides an overview of the case and the
allegations, with due cross referencing of the evidence and the identity documents, to
establish prima facie culpability of the fugitive in the eyes of a foreign judge. Care should be
taken to avoid the use of abbreviations, acronyms or terms that would be obvious to an Indian
reader, but not to a foreign reader.
Note: In cases where the court concerned is requesting extradition, the request should be
prepared in first person, i.e. by the Hon’ble Magistrate/Judge himself/herself. Requests
written in third person, received from court officials, cannot be processed by the Ministry
of External Affairs since such requests are not accepted by the requested countries.
1.
A template of such an affidavit is given in Part-V of this guideline. (Necessary
changes, depending on the context, may be carried out in the template if the court concerned
makes the request.)
2.
Right at the outset, the affidavit should indicate the basis/capacity in which the
affidavit is executed.
3.
The affidavit should contain:
a)
Brief facts, background, circumstances and history of the case, referring at the
appropriate places the statements of witnesses and other documentary evidence.
b)
Nationality, identity and address of the accused along with description of
accused establishing his identity as the same person who has committed the crime and
who is wanted for trial.
c)
The provision of the law invoked so that a clear prima facie case is made out
against the accused. Emphasis should be on the elements of criminality rather than on
the circumstances of the crime.
d)
The relation of the offence in respect of the law of the requested country to
establish dual criminality.
e)
The offences for which the accused is charged in India.
f)
That the law in question was in force at the time of commission of offences
and it is still in force, including the penalty provisions.
g)
An undertaking to the effect that death penalty will not be sought or imposed
or if imposed, will not be carried out (only if the offence carries a death sentence and
the Extradition Treaty with requested country does not allow death penalty)
h)
An assurance that, if the accused is extradited to India, he would be tried in
India only for those offences for which extradition is sought.
i)
A specific confirmation that the offences are not barred by the period of
limitation.
j)
References to documents and information that would establish the offences for
which extradition is sought, together with a detailed written narrative setting out the
acts or omissions which are alleged against the accused in respect of each offence for
which his extradition is sought.
The following documents are required to be enclosed as part of the dossier:
1.
A Certificate of Evidence should be enclosed.
2.
A letter/order from the court concerned, justifying the accused person’s committal for
trial on the basis of evidence made available in the charge sheet, with a direction seeking the
presence of the accused in court to stand trial in the court concerned;
3.
Copy of First Information Report (FIR), duly countersigned by the competent
judicial authority;
4.
Copy of the charge sheet, duly countersigned by the competent judicial authority;
5.
Warrant of arrest, in original. The warrant of arrest should be open dated,
indicating clearly only those offences for which the accused is charged and the court has
taken cognizance of, with relevant section(s) thereof;
6.
Documents in support of nationality, identity, address of the accused. The
evidence/documents enclosed for this purpose must establish that the individual is the person
who has committed the crime and is the same person who is wanted for trial;
7.
In case the photograph and/or finger print of the accused are attached as a document,
it should be identified through a separate affidavit. If more than one such evidence is
attached, each one is required to be identified separately, in the same or an additional
affidavit;
8.
If any CD/electronic records like telephonic conversations, media files etc. are
enclosed as documentary evidence, authorised transcripts of the contents from a competent
authority must be enclosed;
9.
If local/indigenous weapon(s) used in the crime viz. Kripan, gupti, rampuri, etc. are
mentioned, they should be amply described and explained through a separate affidavit for
proper understanding of the requested country and to avoid confusion of the concerned
authority of the requested country;
10.
Copy of the relevant provisions under which the accused is charged, along with
the extracts of the relevant laws indicating the maximum sentence prescribed for the offence
for which the accused is charged or convicted;
11.
Copy of the relevant provisions in support of the confirmation that the offences are
not barred by the period of limitation;
12.
Each page of the dossier should be countersigned by the competent judicial authority
along with stamp. (The stamp should be clear as well as legible, without any smudging.)
The dossier:
1.
All the information and documents mentioned above constitute the dossier;
2.
If the extradition request is made to a country where English is not the official first
language, the whole dossier should be accompanied by a certified translation in that
country’s official first language, the correctness of which is to be certified by the translating
authority;
3.
Translated copy, if any, should constitute part of the dossier and should not be
enclosed separately; and
4.
An index at the beginning of the dossier should mention the documents with
corresponding page number.
Special Remarks relating to Extradition Requests for Crimes covered by
Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and other Dowry-related Offences
Some of the countries with which India has extradition treaties in force, have declined
extradition requests for fugitive criminals charged with offences under Section 498-A on the
plea that conduct categorized as offence under Section 498-A (which involves meting out
harassment to a woman, where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person
related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on
account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand), on the plea that
such offence has no equivalent in their jurisprudence, thereby failing the dual criminality
requirement, an essential ingredient in bilateral extradition treaties.
If, however, the specific underlying activities of the offence in question constitute activities
that are criminal offences under the law of the foreign country concerned, it is possible that
the qualifications of dual criminality would be met. Therefore, among potential offences that
could be considered extraditable are assault, murder, and fraud showing criminal intent.
Charges relating to such offences should be specifically brought against the accused by the
concerned law enforcement agencies and charged under the appropriate provisions of the
Indian Penal Code. The request should not seek extradition based primarily on violation of
Section 498-A. The request would also have to fully describe evidence showing the
commission of specific activities perpetrated by the offender that led to charges under the
Indian Penal Code.
Formatting Requirements for an Extradition Request
1.
The request should be in a form befitting presentation to a foreign Government on
behalf of the Government of India.
2.
A4 size white paper should only be used for the covering letter.
3.
All pages should be printed on one side of the paper only (not back-to-back).
4.
The documents should be clearly typed/written and legible.
5.
All the signatures have to be affixed with a stamp and the stamp should be clear as
well as legible, without any smudging.
6.
Care may be taken to avoid over-writing and corrections. If they cannot be avoided,
the deponent should initial against each of such over-writings and corrections and affix
his/her stamp.
7.
Original documents in Indian languages should be accompanied by a certified
English translation, the correctness of which is to be certified by a senior officer.
8.
All the pages of the dossier should be numbered;
9.
An index at the beginning of the dossier should properly reference each document in
the dossier, with corresponding page numbers;
10.
Each page of the dossier should be countersigned by the deponentalong with stamp.
The stamp should be clear as well as legible without any smudging;
11.
The contents of the dossier should properly bound, preferably with a separate
synthetic cover so that the contents remain protected even during transportation & storage;
12.
The Original completed dossier, along with three identical photocopies of the
original dossier should be enclosed with the covering letter. The copies are to be prepared
after signatures and affixing the stamps. No original signature or stamp should be affixed
on the photocopy.
13.
The covering letter of the extradition request should:
a)
Be from a Senior Officer (not below the rank of Joint Secretary to the Government
of India or Secretary to the State Govt. or equivalent);
b)
Contain a note indicating correctness of the request and contents of the dossier;
c)Be accompanied by the completed checklist, as provided in Annexure - ( );
d)
Specifically confirm that the dossier has been prepared in accordance with the
guidelines and as per the enclosed checklist.
e)Be addressed to Joint Secretary (CPV Division), Ministry of External Affairs, New
Delhi, accompanied by one original and 3 (three) identical photocopies of the
dossier.
f) A soft copy, in advance, may be forwarded to JS (CPV), JS (IS-II) MHA, and NCBINDIA (CBI/IPCU)
Repatriation of the Fugitive approved for Extradition
Once the foreign country concerned approves the extradition of the fugitive, an escorting
team is to be nominated by the law enforcement agency concerned. The following aspects
may be kept in mind for ensuring that the process is smoothly managed:
i.
An adequately strong escort team competent to handle any kind of eventuality during
the transportation of the fugitive;
ii.
Necessary clearances/Sanction of the Ministries concerned and the State Government
of the requesting law enforcement agency for the travel of the Escort Team and the
fugitive has to be obtained (State Government, MEA Political Clearance);
iii.
Passport and Visa of the Officers/Officials of the Escort Team may be obtained
sufficiently in advance after obtaining the Political clearance;
iv.
Attention should be paid to the details in Circular No.42/2005 issued by the Bureau of
Civil Aviation Security, Ministry of Civil Aviation, regarding carriage of prisoners;
v.
As per the treaty provisions and general practice, the requesting country i.e. Law
Enforcement Agency concerned, has to bear the cost of the transportation of the
fugitive. Hence air tickets of the fugitive are required to be purchased accordingly.
vi.
The Embassy/High Commission of India in the foreign country concerned, is to be
requested for arranging emergency travel documents of the fugitive in case the travel
documents possessed by the fugitive is presumed not to be genuine.
vii.
Where transit and change of flight is involved, all the Airlines concerned need to be
fully intimated well in advance about the sensitivity attached with the travelling of
Escort Team to bring back the fugitive, to prevent any kind of unwarranted situation.
viii.
Travel itinerary of the Escort Team with the names, designations, passport details,
visa and air tickets to be provided to NCB-India to send the same to the Indian
Mission concerned and the NCB of the foreign country concerned.
LIST OF FUGITIVES EXTRADITED TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES
SL. NO.
NAME
NATIONALITY
1
Yogesh Rati Lal Shah
Indian
EXTRADITED
TO
USA
OFFENCES
Cheating
YEAR OF
EXTRADITION
2002 (April)
2
Ravinder Kumar
Indian
Canada
Murder
2002 (October)
3
Salwant Singh
Singapore
Singapore
Cheating
2002 (December)
4
Raghuveer Singh Gill
Indian
Canada
Murder
2003 (February)
5
Cyrus Homi Cooper
Indian
Canada
Drug Offences
2003 (April)
6
Denis Lepage
Canadian
Canada
Drug Offences
2004 (January)
7
Peter Michael Prokop
German
German
Fraud, theft
2004 (September)
8
Indian
Canada
Drug Offences
2005 (April)
9
Mohammad Hanif Haji
Jusab
Shri Summit Ganguly
Indian
USA
Cheating
2005 (April)
10
William George Benedict
US
USA
Drug Offences
2005 (August)
11
Aidan (Madanny) Elisha
Israeli
Netherlands
Drug Offences
2006 (June)
12
Dheramendra Debi
Dutch
Netherlands
Murder
2007 (May)
13
Canadian
Canada
USA
USA
Sexual Abuse
of Children
Sexual Crimes
2007 (June)
14
Ernest Fenwick
Macintosh
Alan Horowitz
15
Maninder Pal Singh Kohli
Indian
UK
Murder Case
2007 (July)
16
Stefan Wathne
Iceland
USA
Fraud
2008 (January)
17
Serbjit “Rick” Singh
Indian
USA
Drug Offences
2008 (January)
18
Indian
USA
Murder
2008 (July)
19
Kamlesh Babulal
Aggarwal
Ram K. Mahbubani
American
USA
Fraud
2008 (October)
20
Kala Abdul Kafoor
Bosnia
South Africa
Drug Offences
2008 (December)
21
Bhavesh Kamdar
USA
USA
Fraud
2008 (December)
22
Somaia Ketan Surendra
Kenyan
UK
Cheating
2009 (July)
23
Rajinder Singh Sethi
Indian
USA
Drug Offences
2009 (August)
24
Neil P. Campbell
Australia
USA
Financial fraud
2011 (February)
25
Dusan Kovacevic
Croatian
Croatia
Drug Offences
2011 (May)
26
Dan Boakye Agyeman
Ghanaian
USA
Bank Fraud
2011 (August)
27
Avtar Singh Grewal
Indian
USA
Murder
2011 (September)
28
Adam Piotr Mancic
Polish
Germany
Murder
2011 (December)
29
Sucha Singh
Indian
USA
Murder
2011 (December)
2007 (June)
30
Satvinder Pal Singh
Indian
Australia
Rape
2011 (December)
31
Indian
Australia
Murder
2012 (March)
32
Abdul Khalid Bin Abdul
Rahman
Niranjan Patel
Indian
USA
2012 (July)
33
Jaswinder Singh Mutta
Indian
Australia
Immigration
fraud
Rape
34.
Lakshminivasa Rao Nersu
Indian
USA
Murder
2013 (May)
35.
Bangladeshi
USA
UK
USA
37.
Amit Mohan Singh
USA
USA
38.
Kulwinder Singh Uppal
Indian
UK
39
Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul
Indian
USA
Murder/
intimidation
Fraud, false
statement to
bank.
Rape, Sexual
abuse,
endangering
the welfare of
child.
Kidnapping &
false
Imprisonment
Rape
2013 (July)
36.
Mahfuz haq @ Asiful
Huq
Christopher Godfrey
40
Sabooni Shahin
USA
Money
Laundering
2015 (February)
41
Amit Livingston
Dual Nationality
- Iranian and
Canadian
USA
USA
Murder
2015 (July)
42
Simardeep Singh
Indian National
Australia
Murder
2015 (August)
2012 (July)
2013 (July)
2013 (September)
2013 (November)
2014 (November)
As of August 2015
****
LIST OF FUGITIVES EXTRADITED BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS TO INDIA
SL.NO.
NAME
NATIONALITY
EXTRADITED
FROM
OFFENCES
YEAR OF
EXTRADITION
1.
Aftab Ahmed Ansari
Indian
UAE
Terrorism
2002 (February)
2.
Rajender Anadkat
Indian
UAE
Terrorism
2002 (February)
3.
Muthappa Rai
Indian
UAE
2002 (May)
4.
Ravinder Kumar Rastogi
Indian
UAE
5.
Iqbal Sheikh Kaskar
Indian
UAE
6.
Izaz Pathan
Indian
UAE
7.
Indian
UAE
8.
9.
Mustafa Ahmed Umar
Dosa
Anil Ramachandran Parab
K. Vijay Karunakar
Indian
Indian
UAE
Nigeria
10.
Chetan M. Joglekar
Indian
USA
11.
Ashok Tahilram
Sadarangani
Akhtar Husaini
Indian
Hong Kong
Organized
Crime
Economic
Offences
Mumbai Bomb
Blasts
Mumbai Bomb
Blasts
Mumbai Bomb
Blasts
Murder
Criminal
Conspiracy and
Cheating
Criminal
Conspiracy and
Cheating
Financial Fraud
Indian
UAE
Terrorism
2004 (June)
Indian
UAE
Indian
Canada
Sara Sahara
Complex Case
Murder
2004 (July)
14.
Tariq Abdul Karim @
Tariq Parveen
Baldev Singh
15.
16.
Sharmila Shanbag
Allan John Waters
Indian
British
Germany
USA
2004 (September)
2004 (September)
17.
Indian
UAE
Indian
USA
Indian
UAE
British
British
Bulgaria
Tanzania/Britain
22.
Wulf Ingno Werner
Australian
Australian
23.
Anil Vaju Bhai Dhanak
Indian
UAE
24.
25.
Monica Bedi
Abu Salem
Indian
Indian
Portugal
Portugal
26.
Harpal Singh Cheema
Indian
Canada
27.
Kulbir Singh Kulbeera @
Indian
USA
Economic
Offences
Cheating
Sexual Abuse of
Children
Sexual Abuse of
Children
Criminal
Conspiracy and
Kidnapping
Passport Fraud
Eight Criminal
Cases
TADA/Arms
Act.
Terrorism
2005 (March)
20.
21.
Umarmiya Bukhari @
Mamumiya
Charan Jeet Singh
“Cheema”
M. Varatharajaloo @
M.V. Raja @ Louis Jaloo
Ashok Kumar Sharma
Grant Duncan Alexander
Financial Fraud
Sexual Abuse
of Children
Murder and
Extortion
Terrorism
12.
13.
18.
19.
2003 (January)
2003 (February)
2003 (February)
2003 (March)
2003 (April)
2003 (July)
2003 (November)
2004 (June)
2004 (August)
2004 (December)
2005 (February)
2005 (May)
2005 (June)
2005 (August)
2005 (September)
2005 (November)
2005 (November)
2006 (May)
2006 (June)
28.
Barapind
Bachan Singh Sogi
Indian
Canada
2006 (June)
Germany
Criminal Breach
of Trust
Criminal
Conspiracy etc.
Cheating &
Forgery
Cheating &
Criminal Breach
of Trust
Kidnapping/
Murder
Bank Fraud
Indian
Thailand
30.
Kosaraju Venkateswara
Rao
Govind Srivastava
Indian
Belgium
31.
Nitin Umeshbhai Yagnik
Indian
Mauritius
32.
Malkiat Singh @ Mitta
Canadian
Canada
33.
A.N. Ghosh
Indian
34.
35.
36.
Rajesh K. Mehta
Baljeet Singh
Joginder Singh
Indian
Indian
Indian
Belgium
South Africa
South Africa
Fraud
Murder
Murder
2007 (October)
2008 (June)
2008 (June)
37.
Surender Kumar
Indian
South Africa
Murder
2008 (June)
38.
Narendra Rastogi
Indian
USA
Economic
Offences
2008 (July)
39.
Gurpreet Singh Bhullar
Indian
Thailand
Murder
2009 (May)
40.
Gunaranjan Suri
Indian
USA
Criminal
Conspiracy and
Cheating
2009 (July)
41.
Narender Kumar Gudgud
Indian
USA
Financial fraud
2009 (August)
42.
Prem Suri
Indian
USA
Criminal
Conspiracy and
Cheating
2009 (July)
43.
Malay Sumanchandra
Parikh
Indian
USA
Fraud
2009 (September)
44.
Vijayan Gabriel
Indian
Oman
Murder
2010 (May)
45.
Yaniv Benaim @ Atala
Israeli
Peru
Drug Offences,
Theft and
Financial Fraud
2011(August)
46.
Subash Chandra Kapoor
USA
Germany
Criminal
Conspiracy
2012 (July)
47.
Fasih Mohammad
Indian
Saudi Arabia
Criminal
Conspiracy
2012 (October)
48.
Nikil Prakash Shetty @
Nishit Prakash Arasa
Indian
UAE
Criminal
Conspiracy
2013 (June)
49.
Ashok Dharmappa
Devadika
Indian
UAE
Criminal
Conspiracy
2013 (August)
50.
Abdul Sathar @ Manzoor
Indian
UAE
Terrorism
2013 (August)
29.
2006 (June)
2006 (October)
2007 (March)
2007 (May)
2007 (August )
51.
Shammi Kumar
Indian
UAE
Murder
2014 (January)
52
Usmane Ghani Khan
Indian
Saudi Arabia
2014 (April)
53
Balwinder Singh
Indian
USA
Waging or
attempting to
wage war
against Indian
State
Attempt to
Murder
54
Jagtar Singh Tara
Indian
Thailand
Murder
2015 (January)
55
Bannaje Raja @ Rajendra
Bannanje
Indian
Morocco
Murder
2015 (August)
2015 (March)
As of August 2015
****