Taxonomy and its implication for Data Management Royal Museum for Central Africa 5 June 2013 Marc de Mayer Taxonomy Science concerned with Nomenclature: give ‘scientific’ names to species Strictly regulated, different ‘codes’ for botany, zoology, bacteria Classification: create and name groups, ‘taxa’ ‘Systematics’ is often used as an equivalent (but actually the study of the kinds and diversity of organisms) Classification 1,700,000 names! We need a system to organise this information Hierarchical classification Classification is based on phylogeny (common descent) Hypothesis: life only originated once; all organisms descend from a single ancestor Basis of objectivity in classification Basic scientific name: Genus species Any species should be named using the binominal nomenclature: Homo sapiens Musca domestica Basic scientific name: Genus species Regulated by the codes: Codes are drafted and maintained by Commissions International Code for Zoological Nomenclature International Code for Botanical Nomenclature International Code for Bacterial Nomenclature Commissions are arbiter in case of disputes Problem: many unicellular organisms are neither plants nor animals, have two names Availability of scientific name: Published Spelled in Latin letters (Latin or latinized word) Written in italics Genus with capital letter Species without capital letter Many additional rules Note: in botany we speak of ‘validity’ of name! Publication Names have to be published to be available Rules for availability are part of the code Since 2012: web publication allowed! Date of publication determines seniority of the name Important in case of dispute Start of the nomenclature: Zoology: Linnaeus (1758). Systema naturae… 10th ed. Botany: Linnaeus (1753). Species plantarum. 1st ed. Authority Author of the publication that contains the description becomes ‘author’ of the taxon name Date of description is the date that the publication became publicly available Not necessarily the same as the date on the cover of the publication Journals have a tendency to be published late Reprint versus journal Online publication versus printed publication Differences in calendars (e.g. Russia in the beginning of the 20th century; French revolution) Authority Authority is very important in taxonomy, often added to the name For many journals mandatory for taxa of rank genus and below E.g. Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 Zoology: with year of publication E.g. Zostera noltii Hornemann Botany: without year Names are unique… … but not absolutely so Botanical name can be same as zoological There is no central register (yet), so this leaves a lot of scope for mistakes ‘Preoccupied name’ Has to be replaced with another name – ‘replacement name’ (have to check this: zoobank?) Specific epitheton Second part of species name Is often an adjective Takes gender from the genus name (which is always a noun) Can be other than adjective Noun in apposition Locality Named after a person genitive Uni-, bi- et multinomens Names of rank of genus and above consist of a single part E.g. ‘Hominidae’, ‘Homo’ Names of rank species and below consist of several parts E.g. ‘Homo sapiens’ Subspecies… indicated with extra parts E.g. ‘Homo sapiens erectus’ Several name parts, one name Classification can change Phylogeny = scientific study, Research results can alter understanding Interpretation of facts can be different between scientists Difficult to construct a complete and consistent classification Can result in name changes Species moves from one genus to another… Epitheton changes when genus has other gender for those adjectives based on Latin or latinized words Higher classification: common descent Animalia Arthropoda Crinoidea Holothuroidea Echinodermata Chordata … Asteroidea Ophiuroidea Echinoidea Hierarchy: sub-sets Biota Animalia Arthropoda Echinodermata Crustacea … … … Plantae … Fungi … … … Hierarchy: ranks Regnum: Animalia, Plantae… Phylum: Arthropoda, Echinodermata… Classis: Crustacea, Insecta… Ordo: Decapoda, Amphipoda, Isopoda… Familia: Xanthidae, Diogenidae… Genus: Xantho, Progeryon… Species: Xantho granulicarpus, Xantho hydrophilus… Extra ranks ‘Super-’, ‘Sub-’, ‘Infra-’ Subordo, infraordo, superfamilia… Not for genus and species (except subspecies) Tribus: between family and genus Infraspecific Subspecies only rank recognised in zoology Botany: varietas, forma Botany: ‘Divisio’ instead of ‘Phylum’ Standard endings Rank Divisio Subdivisio Classis Subclassis Ordo Subordo Superfamilia Familia Subfamilia Tribus Subtribus Botany Bacteriology Zoology (-phyta/-mycota) (-phytina/-mycotina) (-phyceae/-mycetes/-opsida) (-phycidae/-mycetidae/-idae) -ales -ales -ineae -ineae (-oidea) -aceae -aceae -idae -oideae -oideae -inae -eae -eae (-ini) -inae -inae Nomenclature Publication To be valid, name has to be published in a publication acceptable to the code Name has to be unique within the domain of the code Zoological name can be same as botanical Typification Name has to be supported by a type Name changes If a species is transferred from one genus to another, the species’ name changes Zoology: the original author’s name is placed between brackets Spongia aurea Montagu, 1818 Hymeniacidon aurea (Montagu, 1818) Botany: parentheses + author of the new ‘combination’ Halophila stipulacea (Forsskål) Ascherson Name changes Specific epitheton is often adjective, has to be declined according to rules of latin grammar Turbo littoreus Linnaeus, 1758 Littorina littorea (Linnaeus, 1758) But only if it concerns a Latin or latinized word! Specific epitheton can be noun, which has its own gender Tellina (Moerella) pygmaeus Lovén, 1846 Taxonomists, but especially other users of taxonomic names, are often mistaken! Tellina pygmaea: wrong!! Validity of name Not the same as available. Zoology: oldest available name is the valid name Note: in botany ‘valid’ is the same as ‘available’ in zoology. Here they speak of ‘accepted’ Validity of name Synomyms: two different names for the same species. Oldest takes priority. (objective and subjective synonyms) Homonyms: one name for two different species. Oldest takes priority. (primary and secondary homonyms) Typification Type serves as an anchor, to stabilise taxonomy Type of a species: specimen Zoology Type of a genus: species Type of a family: genus Botany: type is always a specimen Typification Different kind of types: Primary types and secondary types Types fixed in original publication versus later designation Synonyms Objective synonyms Preoccupied name… Objective synonyms have the same type Subjective synonyms An author has described a taxon, but a subsequent author has stated that the specimens of that species actually belong to a taxon that has been described before Interpretation of the literature Difference between misidentifications and synonyms not always clear List of names below a taxonomic name in a taxonomic revision often contain both! Different authors use different classifications Importance of having an intelligent database, that aids in interpreting names Has to have information on synonyms, spelling variations… Problems with names With names themselves Synonyms With identification =applying name to specimen Name will often depend on source of information used Need to document identification keys Problem integrating data from different sources Need for quality control Types of tax info systems ‘Nomenclators’: list of names Taxonomic List of names, plus taxonomic information (author, reference for description publication…) Who’s valid?? Species database Information on biology, identification… Distribution For a group of species or for a region Indexing literature Zoological record Started 1864, now available electronically Originally Linnaean Society, now commercial Unfortunately ridiculously expensive Some free resources http://www.organismnames.com http://www.biologybrowser.com/ Nomenclators Index Kewensis Included in the IPNI database, http://www.ipni.org/index.html Index animalium http://www.sil.si.edu/digitalcollections/indexanimalium/ Nomenclator Zoologicus http://www.ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ Zoobank http://zoobank.org/
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz