Wartime Reconstruction: The West • • • • Union captures New Orleans April-May 1862 144,000 white population Largest city of the Deep South Critical transportation link between Mississippi (and the interior) and eastern seaboard (and Atlantic) Flag Officer David G. Farragut who commanded the Union fleet that broke through to New Orleans. Major General Benjamin Franklin Butler, Military Governor of New Orleans under Union Occupation. Panoramic View of New Orleans-Federal Fleet at Anchor in the River, ca. 1862. Banks’ labor plan • 700,000 Af-Ams under strict control • Compulsory yearly contracts • Strict limitations on mobility Regulations by S. W. Cozzens, [Feb? 1864], filed between P-76 and P-77 1864, Letters Received, ser. 1920, Civil Affairs, Department of the Gulf, U.S. Army Continental Commands, Record Group 393 Pt. 1, National Archives. Although this printed copy bears no evidence of its date of issue, Cozzens's regulations probably date from about February 15, 1864, when he transmitted a slightly different handwritten version to a subordinate “inspector of plantations.” (S. W. Cozzens to Mr. Charles L. Dunbar, 15 Feb. 1864, vol. 123, pp. 119–21, Outgoing Correspondence of the Plantation Bureau, 3rd Agency, Civil War Special Agencies of the Treasury Department, Record Group 366, National Archives.) • Unionists – Conservative planters and merchants – Free State Association – Antebellum free blacks • Constitutional convention (1864) – Ends slavery, but ignores calls for black suffrage • Given that a prosperous society depends on economic growth, how do you make people industrious? • Which forms of political and social organization are most conducive to general prosperity? Thomas Ford, A History of Illinois, from its Commencement as a State in 1818 to 1847 (Chicago: S.C. Griggs, 1854), 95. “A Glance at Our Moral and Social Condition,” The United States Democratic Review 42 (October 1858): 315-22. William Ellery Channing, A Selection from the Works of William E. Channing D. D. (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1855), 21. Free labor • “free labor” ideals – – – – – Healthy desire to fulfill wants and accumulate goods Tend to virtuous personal habits And hence political liberty Economic carrots rather than sticks Free markets above all (laissez faire) • Against this measure, how did slavery stack up? • When is it appropriate for the government to step in? Edward S. Philbrick to The Liberator (May 13, 1864) It seems to me, and I think the same view would be taken by any practical men who has had much intercourse with laboring classes, that Industry to the great and by far the most efficient engine to be used for the elevation of the negro. In his present condition, his industry has never been cultivated one bit more than his intellect. His wits have been almost exclusive employed, for generations back, in devising means to shirk labor, for his labor was never rewarded pro rate. Thus he has become a confirmed shirk, and the habit is not be shaken off in a hurry. Any system of labor by which be can put down on his own responsibility, and he required to provide for himself, at the same time paying bas exactly in proportion to the amount of labor actually performed, will be the surest way to develop habits of industry , and get rid of the degrading effects of compulsory labor and a position of no responsibility. Edward S. Philbrick to The Liberator (May 13, 1864) [cont.] In this view, I believe our Port Royal system is far better than any system by which the laborer is paid for his time by the day or month. The very moment he sells his time to me, the negro begins to device means of spending that time with at little exertion as possible; and, as mentioned above, the negro has had an education that renders him very expert in this thing. The very strongest incentive to exertion that can be devised is, undoubtedly, to have an interest in the land; provided a man has sufficient capital to live on while raising a crop for tale, and provided be has sufficient confidence in the future to work for a distant reward, and sufficient knowledge and appreciation of the usages of civilized society to live at peace with his neighbor, and respect his neighbor's rights. Edward S. Philbrick to The Liberator (May 13, 1864) [cont.] If the possession of the land is the strongest incentive to industry , it should also be regarded as the highest boon, next to citizenship, which a man can acquire in society. It should, therefore, not be indiscriminately given, away, but held as the reward for self-imposed exertion. The negro should not be allowed to buy land to the exclusion of whites, any more than the white to the exclusion of the negro. They should both have a fair chance in the race, on the same footing; and then the negro will soon show himself not only capable of earning his homestead, but becoming a citizen too; and I have confidence that this will be granted him in time…. The friends of the negro have, in my opinion, made a mistake in wishing to make special enactments In his favor. They thus not only tend to defeat their own ends, by raising to as active condition against him a degree of odium among men who might otherwise let him alone, but, by petting the negro himself, tend to demoralize him by removing from his shoulders a part of the burthen which I verily believe God intended him to bear—viz., the full responsibility of working for his living on as equal footing with other men. Should the freedmen be viewed as ready to take their place as citizens and participants in the competitive marketplace, or did their unique historical experience oblige the federal government to take special action on their behalf? Eric Foner, A Short History of Reconstruction, p. 31. The players • The freedpeople (those who had been enslaved) – Want to reconstruct meaningful lives in freedom • The planters (and their representatives in government) – Want coerced labor necessary to continue to generate profits • The state (the national government) – Wanted profitable but “free” exploitation of periphery to benefit the nation Freedman’s Bureau officers, who were often taken from the ranks of military officials, were charged with reconstructing the plantation regime by negotiating between planters and the freedpeople What freedpeople wanted: “peasant proprietorship” • To reconstitute families, and work in families (rather than in the gangs demanded by plantation labor) • To engage in market relations only on nonexploitative terms • To produce for subsistence and local exchange (rather than for the market) • To reconstitute themselves as a self-sufficient peasantry (as opposed to a wage-earning proletariat) - - Access to capital + + the state Desire for labor control planters freedpeople Being freed into a competitive capitalist economy with virtually no capital, the freedpeople were ripe for exploitation and coercion. Both the planters and the state had an interest in the persistence of economic success in the plantation complex. How would they fare from place to place? • Proletarian: freedpeople compelled by low availability of land, competitive market conditions , and law to continue to work on plantations on “free” (but exploited) wagelabor basis • Peasantry: freedpeople able to reconstitute themselves as a self-sufficient rural peasantry, largely independent of external market forces The sole ambition of the freedman at the present time appears to be to become the owner of a little piece of land, there to erect an humble home, and to dwell in peace and security at his own free will and pleasure : if he wishes to cultivate the ground to cotton on his own account, to be able to do so without any one to dictate to him hours or systems of labor; if he wishes instead to plant corn or sorghum or sweet potatoes, to be able to do that free from any outside control, — in one word, to be free to control his own time and efforts without any thing that can remind him of past sufferings in bondage. A. Warren Kelsey, Orangeburg, S. C, Sept. 8, 1865. The Davis Bend experiment
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz