Role of Freight in the Greening of Transport: Update on carbon trends and initiatives Professor Alan McKinnon Kühne Logistics University, Hamburg Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh FTA Logistics Carbon Reduction Conference 29th May 2012 Steady Upward Trend in CO2 Concentration in the Atmosphere Updated May 2012 Source: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ Source: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ Rise in Average Global Temperature average global temperature in 2010 was the highest on record. Source: http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/ Evidence of Land Surface Warming: Berkeley Earth Project October 2011 Median line 1979-2000 Lowest on record Source: Guardian 12th Sept 2011 Outcomes of the Durban Climate Change Conference 2011 Kyoto protocol extended from 2012 to 2017: Official framework for the European Emissions Trading Scheme and Clean Development Mechanism continues for at least 5 more years Launch of a process to renegotiate Kyoto Protocol (so-called Durban Platform) – hope for agreement in 2015 and implementation by 2020 Agreed governance for a ‘Green Climate Fund’ of $100 bn to help developing countries reduce their GHG emissions and adapt to climate change ‘Climate diplomats’ - pleased with the outcomes – more than expected Scientists and environmental groups very disappointed 2015 Climate accord will have to be very bold and radical for us to stay within 2o C temperature rise by 2100 DHL 2050 Study: 5 Scenarios ‘Mass consumption for population of 9 billion’ ‘Destruction of ecosystem implicitly accepted’ On course for 6o C temperature rise by 2100 Rise in sea level requiring ‘massive expenditure on flood protection’ Megaefficiency in megacities Customised lifestyles Paralysing Global resilience – protectionism local adaptation http://www.dp-dhl.com/en/logistics_around_us/delivering_tomorrow_logistics_2050.html Economic Growth Increases Freight Transport Emissions per Capita US Canada Australia Source: Eom, Schipper and Thompson, 2012 Projected Growth of Inland Freight Movement (billion tonne-km) Source: EU Transvisions project (2009) EU +160% 43 years India +166% bn tonne-kms (McKinsey, 2010) 13 years Availability of Freight Data to Monitor Impact of Climate Change Policies road Tonnes-lifted Tonne-kms Unit loads Distance travelled Average payload weight Vehicle utilisation by weight Vehicle utilisation by volume % of empty running Fuel efficiency Carbon intensity of fuel in some EU countries rail waterway intermodal for most / all EU countries EU Research Project on improving collection, analysis and dissemination of freight data Now unlikely to be funded http://www.acea.be/images/uploads/files/20101116_SAG_Report.pdf % of lorry-kms run empty: national and international transport 2010 (UK data for 2009) Source: Eurostat report 63/2011 Misrepresentation of the UK Road Freight Sector in Eurostat Data? Average payload weight (2010) % Deviation from the Average Weight of an EU Truck Load UK has lowest average payload weight Despite 44 tonne weight limit A statistical anomaly? Only a partial measure of vehicle utilisation CO2 emissions from UK domestic road haulage UK-registered lorries 20.0 tonnes of CO2 19.5 19.0 18.5 18.0 17.5 17.0 Total emissions 16.5 16.0 15.5 15.0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 kg CO2 per tonne-km 0.145 0.14 Carbon intensity 0.135 0.13 0.125 0.12 0.115 0.11 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Data Sources: DfT: Road Freight Statistics; DEFRA: Guidelines to GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting Modal Split for Inland Freight Transport in the EU: 2009 and 2030 EC White Paper (2011) target for 30% of freight tonnes moving over distances greater than 300km to move by rail or inland waterway by 2030 Without target: Business-as-Usual projection of modal split 90% 80% % of tonne-kms 70% 60% 50% Road 40% Rail IWW 30% 20% 10% 0% 2009 actual without target with target Source: Tavasszy and van Meijeren (2011) – based on Trans-Tools analysis Reflections on the 300km target Public policy interventions required to achieve it ? Need for a 60% long-haul tariff increase to induce it? (Tavasszy and ven Meijeren) Differential rates of ‘greening’ and ‘decarbonisation’ by modes over next 20-40 years Energy efficiency improvements on trucking will make it harder for rail to compete Additional rail and IWW infrastructure capacity required to meet target Carbon implications of this infrastructural expansion SB5 administration / personnel / IT vehicle / infrastructure construction SB4 vehicle / infrastructure maintenance SB3 energy supply chain SB2 vehicle operations SB1 Source: NTM Feasibility and Desirability of Product-Level Carbon Auditing and Labelling ? Huge cost, time and effort in product level carbon auditing Impact on consumer behaviour very uncertain ‘Personal carbon trading could be essential in reducing our national carbon footprint’ House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (2008) Retreat from the Carbon Labelling of Products By 2010 – roughly 1% (by value) of food and drink products had a carbon label in the UK (Guardian 13 October 2010) Rate of carbon labelling for Tesco range: 125 products / annum 560 years to carbon footprint and label the entire range ‘too time-consuming and expensive’ failure of other companies in the sector to support this initiative Wal-Mart scaling down plans to assign a composite ‘sustainability index’ to their products ‘We cannot shop our way our of climate change’ Mark Lynas Efforts to standardise the measurement of freight-related CO2 emissions UK Freight Best Practice programme gets a Welsh make-over www.freightbestpractice.org.uk Expanding Literature on the Greening of Trucks Aerodynamic Profiling: a 360o perspective Teardrop Boat-tails Cheetah Dolphin Trailer under-tray EU proposal to relax truck length limit to enhance aerodynamic profiling port-centric logistics Levels of Environmental Intervention Supply Chain Structure Logistics System Design Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Vehicle Loading Driving Vehicle Maintenance Vehicle Design Vehicle + equipment manufacturers Logistic service providers Individual shippers Supply chain partners National Government European Commission horizontal collaboration Port-centric Logistics: what are the carbon benefits Source: PD Ports London Gateway 60 m fewer lorry-kms per annum 148,000 tonnes of CO2 saved annually Comparison of CO2 Emissions from Conventional and Port-Centric Logistics Supply Chains for Retail Imports 69 Manchester DC Carlisle 369 Preston 253 Stoke-on-Trent Wakefield ICD 134 Teesport port 200 Manchester DC Carlisle 366 Preston 250 Stoke-on-Trent DC port-centric logistics system container movement box van trailer movement transport + handling 260 Carlisle 151 Preston 210 Stoke-on-Trent 134 kg of CO2 263 242 242 total kg of CO2 port to shop McKinnon and Woolford (2011) The Effects of Port-Centric Logistics on the Carbon Intensity of the Maritime Supply Chain: A Preliminary Review’ Proceedings of Low Carbon Shipping Conference , Strathclyde University. Comparison of CO2 Emissions from Conventional and Port-Centric Logistics Supply Chains for Retail Imports 116 Manchester DC Carlisle 548 Preston 431 Stoke-on-Trent 441 Birmingham ICD 266 Felixstowe port 395 Manchester DC Carlisle 560 Preston 444 Stoke-on-Trent DC port-centric logistics system 454 Carlisle 458 Preston 386 Stoke-on-Trent 299 % CO2 savings from adopting PCL system Route shop location Carlisle Preston Stoke-on-Trent Felixstowe – Birmingham ICD – Manchester DC – shop 16 11 32 Felixstowe – Manchester DC – shop 18 13 34 Teesport –Wakefield ICD – Manchester DC – shop 59 17 8 Teesport (DC) – Manchester DC – shop 59 16 7 Estimated Distance and CO2 Savings from PCL CO2 reductions 31,000 tonnes 13,000 tonnes 7 -10, 000 tonnes 7,000 tonnes 2,000 tonnes Source: Lloyds List Empty Container Repositioning: Impact on CO2 emissions Source: J-P Rodrigue ‘Geography of Transport Systems’ Much unnecessary movement of empty containers Very limited pooling of empty containers by shipping lines within port hinterlands Shippers have little incentive to backload containers Little co-ordination of import and export container movements No statistics available to assess scale of the problem and potential CO2 savings Company Booker Group Plc Kraft Foods Nestle UK Ltd Pepsico Food & Beverages Europe Sainsbury’s Arla Foods ASDA Stores Ltd Bacardi Brown-Foreman Brands Brakes Coca-Cola Enterprises Ltd Colgate Palmolive (UK) Ltd Diageo Great Britain Limited Gerber Juice Company Ltd H J Heinz Kellogg Marketing & Sales Co Kimberley Clark L’Oreal UK and Ireland Marks & Spencer plc Mars Molson Coors Brewing Company Musgrave Palmer & Harvey McLane Ltd Procter & Gamble Tesco Unilever UK United Biscuits Waitrose Horizontal Collaboration ECR UK – Starfish project Pilot survey 2009-10 27 Large FMCG Companies Participated 2010-11 Annualised Data No of No. of Pallets or No. of Vehicles Annual Tpt Annual km No of Movements Pall Equiv or Full Veh CO2 Emissions (millions) Depots /Year Moved/Year Equiv's (tonnes) 47,104 9,772,164 126,681,239 1,184.982 271 6,765 1,120,200 No of Flows Annual Tonne Average length km (billions) of haul (km) 10.63 124.2 Represents £200 billion of UK turnover 8% of all UK road tonne-kms 6.3% of truck kilometres travelled A total of 271 warehouse locations 6 retailers account for 91 warehouses 18 manufacturers account for 137 3 wholesalers account for 43 24 (46%) warehouses fall within 9 zones with a 35 km radius Consolidation of Inter-regional Flows channelling flows through consolidation hubs in each region Location of hubs optimised with respect to intra-regional flows S C D Region 1 Region 2 S D D C D C D D C S Region 3 S C S S D D D C % saving for Part Load Movements Affected % saving over All Movements Total Cost Total Kilometres 11.7% 2.6% 20.8% 4.3% Total Hours Tonnes of CO2 6.1% 18.9% 1.7% 3.7% Potential for Consolidating Loads to Support Switch of Inter-regional Flows from Road to Rail Fourteen inter-modal terminals considered Minimum 160 kms of rail distance to be economically viable 26 pallets per wagon, 22 wagons per train Terminals near depots Region 3MG (Merseyside Multimodal Gateway) - Widnes North West 3MG (Merseyside Multimodal Gateway) - Widnes North West DIRFT/EMDC East Midlands DIRFT/EMDC East Midlands DIRFT/EMDC East Midlands Trafford Park North West Trafford Park North West Supply/Delivery area From To From To From To From To From To From To From To North East North East Greater London Greater London Scotland Scotland Wales Wales North East North East Wales Wales Scotland Scotland No of wagons per day 15 36 23 7 22 34 13 24 24 24 14 25 2 19 No of trains per day 0.68 1.64 1.05 0.32 1.00 1.54 0.58 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.64 1.14 0.09 0.86 Meeting to Feedback the Results to the 27 Companies assessing company willingness to collaborate 27 companies 27 companies not possible 40 % of cells assigned green coding possibility good prospect From Analysis to Facilitation, Orchestration and Implementation Work Package 3: 35 Identifying and Validating Successful Collaborative Business Models http://www.co3-project.eu/ Centre for Sustainable Road Freight Transport (CSRFT) • Collaboration between Heriot-Watt & Cambridge Universities • Funded by government research council + industrial consortium • Start date: October 2012 5 year programme Contact details Kühne Logistics University – The KLU Wissenschaftliche Hochschule für Logistik und Unternehmensführung Brooktorkai 20 20457 Hamburg E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.the-klu.org
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz