The Always-On Assembly Line: How Fault Tolerant Servers Boost Output and Reduce Costs for Manufacturing In this white paper, we will provide a management-level overview of some important concerns regarding IT-supported manufacturing. Most importantly, we will explain how high availability computing has become an imperative for manufacturing, and how the latest FT servers provide an innovative method of keeping production lines and reporting running, without interruption, and at a lower cost than other options. Table of Contents 1 – Executive Summary 2 – Even a Minute of Downtime is Too Much 2 – Downtime, Reporting, and the Law Executive Summary Any downtime on the assembly line is tremendously costly. In the year 2000, industry experts estimate that aggregate downtime costs U.S. manufacturers over $1.5 million per hour in lost revenue alone. And even the briefest interruption not only takes a toll on production, it can also create disastrous ripple effects down the supply chain, resulting in fines and lost business when goods are not delivered on time. 3 – The Server 4 – The Central Server 5 - High Availability Computer automation of manufacturing plants is increasing productivity, reducing downtime on the line, and helping to eliminate these risks. Not only do programmable automation controllers (PACs) and robotics perform more tasks on the assembly line, but in addition, 6 - The Science of High Availability supply chains, quality control, human interfaces, and data collection are becoming 8 – Hot-Swappable Hardwar e increasingly computerized. While automation certainly makes manufacturing more efficient 8 - ActiveUpgrade™ for and productive, it also raises the ante for a robust IT infrastructure. Software Maintenance 8 - What Makes an FT Server the Best Value for Manufacturing? At the center of automated manufacturing is the server: the computer hardware that controls and coordinates an intricate system of automated components and interfaces. Most recently, manufacturing plants have relied on clusters of redundant servers to control plant and shop 9 - Total Cost of Ownership 9 - Conclusion floor systems. The redundancy of these clusters helps reduce computer downtime, thus reducing assembly line downtime. Page 1 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line Another approach to reducing downtime, with more reliable fault tolerant (FT) servers, has been overlooked because of the higher price of the hardware. However, the actual total cost of ownership of an FT server is significantly lower than clusters or other options. Moreover, the cost of FT servers is coming down, making FT by far the best value for automating a manufacturing infrastructure. Even a Minute of Downtime is Too Much Manufacturing plants struggle constantly with the challenge of reducing—ideally eliminating—downtime on the assembly line. Some manufacturing plants can lose hundreds of thousands of dollars—even millions—per hour in lost production when production shuts down unexpectedly. Other factors that exacerbate costs for downtime include the following: • In many industries, compliance with government regulations, particularly in the areas of safety and the environment, is a growing factor, requiring continuous data collection and reporting mechanisms. Any downtime in the reporting system means that critical data is lost, exposing the company to fines and even criminal liability. • The “big board” control panels of yesteryear are being replaced by computer-controlled human-machine interfaces (HMIs) and dashboards. Computer downtime may mean a loss of control over plant operations. • Today’s automated plants continually record data to track the location and status of all parts, supplies, and goods on the plant floor. When production stops, this data is critical for operations recovery. The more accurate the tracking data, the sooner and less expensive the restart or recovery is. But if the automated systems go down and this data is compromised or lost, manual recovery is slow and costly. • As manufacturing has moved from vertical integration to an extended enterprise made up of hundreds or even thousands of potential partners, the total costs of downtime are extending throughout the supply chain. Many integrated manufacturers are establishing costly penalties for suppliers who fail to meet minimum performance or delivery metrics. Downtime, Reporting, and the Law When the automated reporting mechanisms in a plant go down, even for a minute, manufacturers face serious consequences in complying with government regulations. Here are a few examples: • The TREAD Act of 2000, enacted after the infamous Ford/Firestone recall, requires automobile manufacturers to submit detailed records to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the serial numbers of components that are installed on each vehicle, to expedite any safety recalls on those components. Manufacturers face criminal liability if any gaps in reporting interfere with a recall for a safety-related defect that causes death or serious bodily injury. In 2006, auto manufacturers spent over $60 billion in warranty remediation; many of these costs can be reduced or avoided with complete and accurate monitoring. Page 2 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line • The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees extensive regulations that apply to emissions of water and air pollutants. Manufacturers who discharge pollutants must continually monitor their emissions, and gather and maintain time-specific data to document the volumes of pollutants they release into the environment. If data is lost, manufacturers face heavy fines, and even litigation. • For drug makers, medical device manufacturers, biotech companies, biologics developers, and other industries regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations, particularly 21 CFR Part 11, require manufacturers to implement and monitor quality controls, validation systems, and documentation of all aspects of their plant operations. Downtime can result in loss of data that is critical for FDA compliance. The Server: Nerve Center of Manufacturing Computer hardware is truly the nerve center, or backbone, of today’s automated manufacturing plants. Plants have become increasingly reliant upon state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment and controls to increase output, reduce costs, boost safety, and eliminate the risks of missing shipments. Components of the Automated Manufacturing Plant The productivity of an automated manufacturing plant depends on constant communication with the central computing system in order to function properly. Uninterrupted and reliable operation is of particular importance in the following subsystems. • Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) MES, which runs on the central computing system, is the software hub of the assembly line. Its role is to control and coordinate the interrelationship between the shop, the plant, and the enterprise. It ensures that all of the functions of the plant are operating smoothly, that data is being captured and reported, and that human operators receive the right information when they need it. Although various modules of MES may run on separate servers, if any one of these servers fails it can result in a serious—sometimes complete—stoppage of plant operations. • Automated Human Machine Interfaces (HMIs) The control and feedback loop between human operators and plant machinery is vital. State-of-the-art systems now replace the “big board” controls with computer dashboards of virtual controls and monitors. These automated HMIs are more efficient, reliable, and comprehensive—as long as the central server is online at all times. Any server downtime results in loss of control and interruption of all systems of the plant. • Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) Robotics, PLCs and other forms of shop floor programmable automatic controllers contain their own control logic for the specific tasks they perform. However, they must be constantly monitored by the shop or plant system for status and performance data. Page 3 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line • Assembly Line Monitoring For better efficiency, as well as reporting and compliance, plants are automating their systems for tracking what parts and supplies are where along the assembly line. Lapses in this information can cause long downtimes, manual reconciliation, and in the case of government compliance, costly penalties. The more reliable the central computing system, the less likely that assembly line monitoring mechanisms will require human intervention. • Inventory A critical step in the supply chain, inventory control is now automated using barcodes and wireless technology. But the inventory is only as good as the incoming data. Lost data means manual counting, reconciling, and adjusting of inventory records. • Compliance and Reporting An increasingly important—and often burdensome—part of the manufacturing process compliance and reporting requirements—are more likely to increase than decrease over time. The need for reliable methods of tracking, recording, and storing continuously generated data, without interruption, is imperative. Manufacturers who implement the most efficient compliance and reporting methods will save time and money, and remain more competitive. The Central Server: The Backbone of Effective Manufacturing Assembly Line Monitoring Automated HMI PLCs Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) Central Computing System Inventory Supply Chain Management Integration ERP Integration Compliance and Reporting The effectiveness of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) is dependent on the uninterrupted service of the central computing system. Page 4 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line • Supply Chain Management (SCM) Integration The manufacturing process is just one link in the supply chain. Through automated supply chain management (SCM), incoming parts and outgoing inventory are tracked and routed in the most efficient manner possible. MES software integrates to SCM to ensure that goods are ordered, shipped, and received on time. Interruption of the link between MES and SCM can have ripple effects up or down the supply chain, costing a manufacturer time and money. • Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Integration Because the assembly line is the life blood of a manufacturing company, executives, managers, legal and finance staff, and human resources staff are vitally interested in integrating the systems they use with those that control the line. Data on product output, supply distribution, compliance, staffing, and many other facets of the line have a direct impact on the front- and back-office operations of the enterprise. For these reasons, major ERP software systems are becoming increasingly integrated with MES. Therefore, loss of data or communications due to computer downtime can interrupt many other offices throughout a manufacturing company. High Availability: Why Does It Matter in Manufacturing? Automotive manufacturing is typical of industries with extended enterprises, complex supply chains, many partners and vendors, and complex compliance issues. When an auto plant stops due to a computer failure, as much as $40,000 per minute of profit is lost to the company, directly. Indirect costs can include penalties from $5,000 to $50,000 if shipments are missed, and audits and fines from the federal government if compliance data is lost. To avoid these unnecessary costs, manufacturing environments need high availability computer hardware for the backbone of the system. High availability describes a system designed and implemented to ensure a certain absolute degree of operational continuity. Availability is generally measured as a percentage of uptime. Since uptimes generally vary from 99% to 99.999%, availability is commonly expressed in terms of “nines.” An average availability of “five-nines,” or 99.999%, represents the optimal performance of today’s high availability computing technologies. “Five Nines” is State-of-the-Art for High Availability Nines Availability Downtime 1 90% 36.5 days/year 2 99% 3.65 days/year 3 99.9% 8.76 hours/year 4 99.99% 52 minutes/year 5 99.999% 5.25 minutes/year Page 5 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line For manufacturing, the difference between “four nines” and “five nines” is significant. For example, a system with only 99.99% uptime could be down for as much as one minute per week. And one minute of downtime can result in much more time in bringing operations back online. The Science of High Availability A more scientific approach to the varying types and levels of availability has been developed “Once manufacturing companies weigh the costs and the risks of the high availability hardware they are using now, the decision to switch to FT servers is an obvious one.” Lary Marshall, Business Development Manager, Rockwell International by the analyst firm IDC. The following table is adapted from IDC’s “Availability Spectrum,” which it uses to aid hardware buyers in selecting an appropriate level of availability. Clearly, AL4 is the superior level of availability for manufacturing and MES applications, since it offers an environment with no interruption of service, even through a hardware failure. However, companies are unfortunately enticed, due to budget constraints, to purchase AL3 or even AL2 systems. Impact of Component Failure on Priority User System Protection Features Availability level 4 (AL4) Transparent to user; no interruption of work; no transactions lost; no degradation in performance 100% component and functional redundancy Availability level 3 (AL3) Stays online; current transaction may need restarting; may experience performance degradation Automatic failover transfers user session and workload to backup components; multiple systems connections to disks Availability level 2 (AL2) User interrupted, but can quickly relog on; may need to rerun some transactions from journal file; may experience performance degradation User work transferred to backup components; multiple system access paths to disks Availability level 1 (AL1) Work stops; uncontrolled shutdown; data integrity ensured Disk mirroring or RAID, and a logbased journal file system for identification and recovery of incomplete in-flight transactions Source: IDC, 2006 Although the concept of high availability computing is not new in manufacturing, the levels of availability, and the relative costs of these levels, is new to many in manufacturing industries. In many plants, IT attempts to “cobble together” systems using off-the-shelf computing hardware to achieve high availability through various forms of clustering technology. Unfortunately, this approach requires considerably more effort to install and stabilize, advanced training of plant managers and IT staff, and reliance on third-party service organizations for maintenance. For these reasons, AL4 fault tolerant systems that deliver 99.999% uptime are gaining acceptance among manufacturing companies. These systems ensure continual, always-on operation of the MES and all of the components and systems that MES coordinates. While in the past it has sometimes been “good enough” to save money on the hardware investment and tolerate some computer downtime and lapse in productivity, today the reduced cost of ownership of FT servers may save them many times their investment by increasing productivity and avoiding line stoppages. Page 6 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line How Do Fault Tolerant Servers Deliver High Availability? A fault tolerant server is built from the ground up to perform at AL4 with “five nines” availability. It is a fully internally-redundant system that goes far beyond the traditional server cluster in terms of reliability and cost-effectiveness. The overarching benefit of an FT server, aside from its superior AL4 high availability, is that the features that ensure high performance are built into the hardware, so they do not have to be installed, configured, and maintained using software. Here are some major features of FT servers—particularly NEC’s Express5800/ft series of servers—that set this technology apart from other high availability technologies. Redundant Components All of the memory, processors, and other components of the FT server are redundant to each other, and physically configured to operate in lockstep. Therefore, one FT server is the equivalent of two conventional servers performing the exact same processes at the same time. In the event that one component fails, its counterpart continues functioning with no interruption in the operation of the system. Since failover is virtually instantaneous, there is no single point of failure, and downtime is nearly eliminated. Conventional vs. Fault Tolerant Servers Conventional Server System I/O-PCI Disk Memory Chipset CPU CPU CPU CPU NEC High Availability (Fault Tolerant) Server System Disk PCI Mirror Multipath Processing Subsystem A Memory Fault Detection & Isolation Fault Detection FT Cross Bar Extended PCI Fault Detection & Isolation I/O Subsystem B CPU CPU CPU CPU Lockstep Memory Fault Detection Chipset CPU CPU CPU CPU System B PCI Disk Chipset System A I/O Subsystem A Extended PCI Processing Subsystem B Fault tolerant servers are superior to conventional servers because there is no single point of failure, no switchover, and a single logical server. Theoretically, a cluster of servers (providing availability at level AL2 or AL3) operates on the same principles as an FT server. However, clustered servers must be configured to work together. Failover function and operation must be set up and diligently maintained by skilled technicians using specialized software. For some IT departments, the effective configuration and maintenance of a high availability cluster may require outside technical expertise. Page 7 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line Hot-Swappable Hardware When a hardware component in an FT server does need replacing, repairs can be made with no downtime, while the overall system is still “hot” and online. Even routine hardware maintenance does not require any planned downtime, and can be performed without Before hot-swappable components were available in FT servers, clusters had the advantage in this regard, since it is relatively easy to take one machine in a cluster offline for “The emergence of true fault tolerant solutions for standard Windows- and Linuxbased server environments from vendors including Stratus, NEC, and others, will provide customers with alternatives to the complexities of clustered-server solutions.” IDC: Stephen L. Josselyn maintenance. Now with hot-swappable FT components, companies do not have to compromise a level of high availability to maintain these servers. ActiveUpgrade™ for Software Maintenance Active Upgrade, a feature of NEC’s FT servers, allows for software updates with minimal interruption of service. One module can be administered offline while the second module continues to handle the operational load. When updates are completed, the two modules synchronize data and return to full redundant operation. A rollback feature is integrated into Active Upgrade in order to return the server to its previous state in the event there is a problem with the software update. What Makes an FT Server the Best Value for Manufacturing? The intense pressure to stay competitive in many manufacturing industries, plus the increasing pressures of government regulations, makes it critical for manufacturing companies to achieve the greatest productivity with the least expenditure of money and effort. The money and effort required to install and deploy an FT server is lower, by every metric, than that of other high availability technologies. The combination of a reduced initial hardware expense, coupled with lower operating costs, makes FT servers a superior value over any other high availability technology. There is simply no reason to compromise productivity or risk supply chain failures. • One NEC Express5800 FT server is less expensive than two conventional servers It is no longer viable to try saving money by purchasing two less expensive conventional servers and clustering them together. Like so many other computer hardware products, FT servers are becoming more affordable. • FT servers require less configuration and maintenance IT departments already struggle with high maintenance expenses—in fact, analysts who survey IT groups find that many spend 50%, even 70% of their budgets on maintaining the systems they have, as opposed to building and improving their operations. FT servers are less expensive to operate than clusters or RAID arrays, because the redundancies and configurations between the components are built into the hardware, instead of configured via software. Fewer specialized IT skills are required to implement FT servers, so it is no longer necessary to hire or contract workers with special skills in order to implement a high availability system. Page 8 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line • One FT server requires only one software license Unlike a cluster, which requires multiple licenses of the operating system, databases, server applications and other software (one for each server in the cluster), an FT server requires only one license of each. Software costs can be dramatically reduced, along with the effort required to install and maintain multiple instances of each software product. “Although clustering has been the predominant vehicle for improving server availability characteristics, the complexity that is often associated with these types of solutions in certain market segments has hampered more widespread acceptance…. IDC believes that the complexity that is often associated with some of these implementations must be further hidden from the end customer to preserve ease of use for IT shops that do not specialize in clustering technology and skill-sets (e.g. scripting to create cluster-aware applications).” • Less downtime means less maintenance Because downtime is dramatically reduced by virtue of the high availability hardware, maintenance time is also reduced. IT staff can concentrate on other critical tasks. Total Cost of Ownership of High Availability Hardware Alternatives Fault tolerant servers provide lower total cost of ownership over the long haul—especially in the event of an outage. IDC: Stephen L. Josselyn Page 9 of 10 The Always On Assembly Line Conclusion A fault tolerant server is clearly the must-have hardware for an effective and productive manufacturing plant. Manufacturing businesses can ill-afford to gamble with the upstream and downstream effects that plant stoppages can have on their supply chains, or with the costs of failure to comply with government regulations—and now they don’t have to. The decreasing upfront cost of FT servers, combined with lower total cost of ownership throughout the life of the computer, makes the purchase of an FT server easy to justify for any manufacturer that seeks to reduce risk, cut costs, and boost output. NEC Fault Tolerant Servers NEC offers a full line of Express5800 fault tolerant servers that offer up to 99.999% uptime. If you would like more information, call: 866-632-3226 or visit www.necam.com/ft. NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA Departmental Servers Division 2880 Scott Boulevard Santa Clara, CA 95050 © NEC Corporation of America. All rights reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. NEC is a registered trademark and Empowered by Innovation is a trademark of NEC Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. www.necam.com (866) 632-3226 Page 10 of 10
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz