Finch, Rebecca
From:
To:
Subject:
Planning Department
Russell, Kurt
RE: Shultern Lane Cannon Park
From: Bob Ghosh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 21 July 2016 02:14 To: Russell, Kurt Cc: 'Gurshinder Sohal'; 'Steve Shergill' Subject: RE: Shultern Lane Cannon Park Importance: High Dear Kurt In response to your emails this week, I have the following responses: 1. Section 106 The details of the applicant’s lawyers are as follows: Peter Mander Mander Hadley Solicitors 1 The Quadrant Coventry Tel: 02476631212 2. Bat roost survey Please find attached Middlemarch Environmental’s nocturnal emergence and dawn re‐entry bat surveys and recommendations for additional clerk of works services. 3. Southeast Elevation I have checked the above elevation and it seemed to be correct. For the avoidance of confusion, I have made the elevations a little clearer. In particular, I have shown the floor datum levels and marked on the height of the core projection, which is consistently 1,650mm above the Level 4 roof datum (or 1,200mm above the Level 4 parapet). For ease of reference all of the elevations are now marked as Revision H. I trust that this clears up any confusion. 4. Cannon Park Community Association Thank you for sending therough the letter from CPCA. Although many of these issues are not Town Planning related (and there are some repetitions), I have provided a point‐by‐point response. Within the response, I have cross‐referred to an email from Warwick University Accommodation Office, dated 19th July 2016. I attach a redacted version of this email for your reference, where we have removed material considered to be commercially sensitive. 5. Plans and Design and Access Statement 1
I also attach revised floor plans. There are some minor internal alterations. For ease of reference all of the floor plans are now marked as Revision H. We have alsi added detailed unit layouts. I also reattach the Location Plan and Site Plan, so you have all of the current drawings attached within this email. Please find attached Revision B of the Design and Access Statement, where I have removed a decription of the roof garden. 6. Application Form Would it be possible to adjust the application form. There are a number of errors which need correcting, namely:  Applicant name: should be Signature Sites Limited – Jasbinder Shergill.  The gross internal area of the proposed development should be: 1,439 sq.m., not 2,119 sq.m. (thisfigure had been left in from the previous application).  Section 9, should read flat membrane roof and remove any reference to ‘paved external terrace’ Should you require anything else for your report to Committee, please do not hesitate to contact me. Also, please let me know as soon as you can, if any of the objectors register to speak at Committee, so we have time to prepare a response. Many thanks Regards
Bob Ghosh, RIBA MAPM CPMA
Director
[email protected]
K4 Architects, Project Managers, Landscape and Urban Design
Resolving Complexity, Creating Exceptional Places
122 Fazeley Street
Warwick Bar
Birmingham
B5 5RS
UK
Tel: 0121 643 4999
Website www.k4architects.com
Follow us on:
Twitter @k4architects
Twitter @bobghoshriba
LinkedIn K4architects
Facebook K4architects
The information contained in this email may be confidential and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient of this email, please accept our apologies and notify the sender immediately. Any unauthorised use of the information contained in this email is
strictly prohibited.
We have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this email and any attachment(s) or hyperlink(s) do not contain viruses, but cannot accept liability for
any loss or damage that you may suffer as a consequence of receipt.
2
Winner of the 2016 West Midlands RICS Awards for Innovation Through Design for The Old Fire Station,
Birmingham Highly Commended at the 2016 West Midlands RICS Awards for Building Conservation for The Old Fire
Station, Birmingham From: Russell, Kurt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 July 2016 10:44 To: Bob Ghosh <[email protected]>; Gurshinder Sohal <[email protected]> Subject: Shultern Lane Cannon Park Dear Mr Ghosh,
I write with regards to the above application.
The south east elevation facing the cemetery appears to show the fibre cement panels shorter
than they should be, as they are shown rising above the 4 storey element on all other plans.
Please can this be amended and sent through to us as a matter of urgency? The correct plan
needs to go out tomorrow with the draft agenda to councillors.
Kind regards.
Kurt Russell Planning Officer Coventry City Council Floor 3, Civic Centre 4 Much Park Street Coventry West Midlands CV1 2PY Tel: 024 7683 1286 www.coventry.gov.uk/planning [email protected] Our Building Control team is now back in-house and based here at Coventry. Phone: 024 7683 2057/2058 or email : [email protected]. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the
addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are requested to contact the sender All e-mails are
monitored by Coventry City Council's ICT Security, using Mimecast. The views contained in this e-mail are
those of the author and not necessarily those of Coventry City Council.
3