NEGRO 'F REEDOM D A Y ' IN C H IC A G O Stage Biggest School Boycott Yet THE M ILITA N T Published in the Interests of the W orking People V o l. 27 - No. 39 M onday, N ovem ber 4, 1963 P rice 10c Defend Algerian Revolution Against Moroccan Attack! A n appeal fo r f u ll aid and so lid a rity w ith th e A lg e ria n R evolutio n against th e a ttack launched by th e Moroccan m onarchy has been issued by th e F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l, the w o rld organization of re v o lu tio n a ry socialists founded by L eon T ro ts k y . (A s w e go to press, th e U P I reports fro m M a li th a t A lg e ria and Morocco have agreed to a cea s e -fire .) T h e m a jo r sectors of th e w o rld T ro ts k y is t m ovem ent, reu n ited a t a congress in It a ly last sum m er a fte r a long sp lit, are represented b y th e U n it ed S ecretariat o f th e F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l w h ich issued th e appeal. T h e f u ll te x t o f th e a p peal follow s. * * * T h e a ttack on A lg e ria is a desperate a tte m p t by th e decayed, fe u d a l-c a p ita lis t re gim e o f th e Moroccan m on archy, backed by French, A m e ric an and Spanish im p erialism , to cut short th e g ro w ing in flu ence of th e A l g erian R evolution among the p o v e rty -s tric k e n masses of Morocco. T h e M oroccan people have tu rn e d to w a rd A lg e ria w ith h opeful eyes. T h e y approve th e deep-going a g ra ria n re fo rm , the sweeping n a tio n a l A lg e ria n President B en B e lla izations, th e establishm ent of a socialist sector o f th e economy and th e steps to w a rd m a k in g A lg e ria th e C uba o f A fric a . T h e y h ave been impressed b y th e organization on a n a tio n -w id e scale o f d em o cratically elected W o rk ers ’ Councils and S e lf-M a n a g e m e n t Com m ittees. T h e y w a n t Morocco to start dow n th e road to w a rd so cialism th e w a y A lg e ria has. T h a t is w h y K in g Hassan’s court clique decided to s trik e at A lg e ria ’s re v o lu tio n a ry g overnm ent and i f possible b rin g it dow n. T h a t is w h y K in g Hassan tim ed his a ttack to coin cide w ith a co u n te r-re v o lu tio n a ry arm ed reb ellio n inside A lg e ria in th e K a b y lie m ountains. B u t th e m ilita ry assault launched b y th e M oroccan m on arch can have unexpected p o litic a l consequences fo r his o w n unstable regim e. A lre a d y th e most im p o rta n t opposition forces inside Morocco have responded to th e re v o lu tio n a ry appeal of the A lg e ria n g overnm ent to o v e rth ro w Hassan I I . T h e y have p u b lic ly called fo r th e defeat of th e reactio nary g overnm ent th ey are cursed w ith . T h e y are cheering fo r th e v ic to ry of A lg e ria ’s re v o lu tio n a ry N a tio n a l People’s A rm y . I f th e A lg e ria n R evolution spreads across th e b order into Morocco it w o u ld constitute a colossal b lo w to th e w hole n eo-colonialist structure supported in W est A fric a by de G au lle, U .S . im p eria lis m and Franco’s fascist regim e. F o r im p eria lism , this is a re a l and frig h te n in g possibility. T h e sectors of U .S . im p e ria lis m w ho see this most c learly are already callin g fo r in te rv e n tio n b y the U n ite d Nations. These acts of aggression against th e A lg e ria n R evolution m ust not succeed! T h e in te rn a tio n a l labor m ovem ent m ust b rin g speedy help to th e A lg e ria n R evolution and block th e aggression u n d ertaken by im p e ria lis m through its stooges. H ands o ff A lg eria! D e fen d th e A lg e ria n R evolution! D o w n w ith Moroccan reaction! F u ll aid and so lid a rity to the A lg e ria n people and th e ir g overnm ent in m o b ilizin g in defense of th e ir R evolutio n against th e attack launched b y th e M oroccan m onarchy! U n ite d S ecretariat o f th e F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l C H IC A G O — Tuesday, Oct. 22, was “ Freedom D a y” in Chicago. I t was the day o f the biggest c iv ilrig h ts boycott in the n a tio n ’s his to ry. A lm o s t 200,000 elem entary and high school students stayed aw ay fro m classes. The students, m ostly Negroes fro m the ghettoes o f the South Side and West Side, w ere protesting the re -h irin g o f School S uperintendent B e n ja m in W illis . He had resigned under fir e fro m his $48,000-a-year jo b as czar of the Chicago school system a fte r s tu b b o rn ly resisting school dese gregation demands. B u t the school board (appointed b y Dem ocratic M a yo r D aley) refused to accept his resignation. F u rth e r boycott actions are being proposed to w in W illis ’ ouster. School teachers and W illis h im self adm itted th a t the boycott constituted a n e a rly unanim ous show of strength, w ith 51.4 per cent o f the elem entary students absent (about 51 p e r cent o f the c ity ’s elem entary students are N egro) and 38.4 per cent o f the h igh school students absent (about 33 per cent o f the h igh school students are N egro). The “ Freedom D ay” boycott was sponsored b y the C oordinating C ouncil o f C o m m u n ity O rganiza tions, representing 16 m a jo r c iv il rig h ts groups. Some o f the students attended “ Freedom Schools” set up in 144 churches, un io n halls and com m u n ity centers. The classes em phasized Negro history, dealing w ith figures fro m A m erican his to ry such as Crispus A ttucks, H a rrie t Tubm an and George W ashington C arver. V o lu n te e r teachers fo r these classes included about 300 teenagers o f the “ S tu dent Advocates o f Negro H is to ry .” W h ile c ity and state o ffic ia ls w ere com p la in in g about the loss o f state aid (W illis estimated the loss a t $470,000), leaders o f the boycott were ju b ila n t about the co m m u n ity response. Law rence L a n d ry , organizer o f the boycott, and co-head o f the Chicago A rea F riends o f the S tudent N on v io le n t C oordinating Com m ittee, said the response to the boycott c a ll was beyond his most o p ti m is tic expectations. “ I don’t lik e to take ch ild re n o u t o f school, b u t we are le ft w ith no a lte rn a tive b u t to take to the streets . . . W h ite m illio n a ire s can b u y an ad James F orm an to support W illis . We are poor and have to go to the streets to be heard,” he to ld newsmen. James Form an, n a tio n a l execu tiv e secretary o f SNCC, w ho fle w in fro m A tla n ta fo r the boycott and dem onstration said: “ The Negroes in Chicago w ill never be the same again. They have become aware o f th e ir pow er.” F orm an predicted “ p o litic a l suicide” fo r M a yo r D aley i f he doesn’t see to i t th a t W illis is fire d . F orm an urged the boycotters to hold another “ Freedom D a y” w ith in 30 days i f D aley o r the school board does n o t act on th e ir demands fo r an end to “ W illis ism .” The “ Freedom D ay” boycott and dem onstration was m obilized b y extensive d is trib u tio n o f leaflets c a llin g fo r “ Thousands o f Free dom M archers” to “ Show Chicago yo u’re sick o f Ben W illis -is m and 2nd rate education — rig h t n o w !” Sound tru cks and Negro rad io stations encouraged students to “ cu t classes.” Students pasted “ Freedom D ay” stickers on w alls, w indow s and lockers in th e ir schools and neighborhoods. Sun day and M onday evenings saw teenagers parading th rough th e ir neighborhoods singing freedom songs and u rg in g fe llo w students to jo in them . The second h a lf o f the protest against W illis and the segregation and in fe rio r education w h ic h he (Continued on Page 2) A Bi-Partisan Gang-Up Yank Teeth of Rights Bill A b i-p a rtisa n gang-up b y lead ers o f the D em ocratic and Repub lican parties in congress has succeeeded in c u ttin g the teeth o f the House J u d ic ia ry subcom m it tee version o f the c iv il rig h ts b ill. B ow ing to the wishes o f P resi dent John F. Kennedy, the fu ll com m ittee Oct. 29 rejected the stronger subcom m ittee d ra ft and voted 23 to 11 in fa v o r of a d ra ft even w eaker than the one o ri g in a lly proposed b y the adm inis tra tio n in regard to vo te r regis tra tio n . The b i-p a rtis a n s trip p in g of the most m ea nin gful sections o f the b ill — p a rtic u la rly the a n ti-p o lic e -b ru ta lity p rovision (T itle I I I ) — was organized under th e per sonal d ire ctio n o f the P resident and his b ro th e r the A tto rn e y Gen eral. The excuse the K ennedy’s gave — th a t on ly the w eak b ill could pass the House — was exploded b y N A A C P executive secretary Roy W ilk in s in a statem ent Oct. 25. He pointed out th a t in 1956 the House, b y a vote o f 279 to 126, passed a c iv il rig h ts b ill contain in g T itle I I I . The R epublican vote fo r the b ill, he pointed out, was 168 and the D em ocratic, o n ly 111. “ Y e t today,” W ilk in s said, “ w e are to ld th a t in order to get Re p u blican support fo r a c iv il rig h ts b ill, th is section m ust be e lim in a t ed. T his position is even m ore as ton ish ing when w e rem em ber th a t P resident K ennedy to ld a news conference last M ay th a t the fed era l governm ent was ‘w ith o u t sta tu to ry a u th o rity ’ to act in B irm in g h a m . N ow th a t s ta tu to ry a u th o rity has been offered, and the A tto rn e y General has fo rm a lly rejected it.” W ill Discuss W ays to Advance Rights Fight Grass-Roots Negro Parley Slated in Detroit D E T R O IT — A genuine grass roots conference of Negro fre e d o m -fig h ters w ill be held here the weekend o f N ov 9 and 10 under the auspices o f the G roup on Advanced Leadership (G O A L ). I t was decided to hold the confer ence a fte r heads o f the D e tro it C ouncil fo r H um an R ights a rb i tr a r ily excluded certain subjects and speakers fro m the agenda o f the N o rth e rn Negro Leadership Conference i t had called fo r the same weekend. Rev. A lb e rt Cleage, leading m ilita n t Negro spokesman, resigned fro m the DCHR, protest ing its bureaucratic action and charging i t w ould s trip the parley o f any effe ctive meaning. He w ill p a rticip a te in the grass-roots con ference called by G O A L and w ill be the p rin c ip a l speaker a t a w in d -u p ra lly on Sunday Nov. 10. The G O A L conference w ill hold workshops th ro u g h o u t the day on S aturday. On S aturday m o rn in g there w ill be one on economic ac tio n w h ich w ill deal w ith the ques tions o f selective buying, a C h ris t mas shopping boycott, and nec essary changes in the economy to cope w ith the p roblem o f unem ploym ent. T h is session w ill also discuss the re ce ntly form ed A ll-T ra d e s In te rn a tio n a l U nion, a Negro group w h ic h has begun to deal w ith the problem o f p ro v id in g union spon sorship fo r Negroes seeking to p a rticip a te in state apprenticeship programs. A S aturday afternoon session on p o litic a l action w ill include the question o f fo rm a tio n o f a na tio n al N egro-led Freedom N ow P arty. L a te r S aturday afternoon there w ill be a w orkshop on education w h ich w ill discuss the fe a s ib ility o f a n a tion al school boycott and evaluate the Chicago boycott and the Englewood experience. G O A L Address A session on S aturday evening w ill deal w ith the problem o f self-defense against ra cist v io lence. P a rticipants com ing fo r the con ference and unable to provide th e ir ow n housing can contact G O A L, R ichard H e n ry president, at 11605 Linw ood , phone 866-4505. The moves o f the D C H R lead ership to d ra s tic a lly lim it its slat ed conference was made p u b lic b y Rev. Cleage in the Oct. 28 issue o f Illu s tra te d News, o f w h ic h he is c o n trib u tin g e dito r. The fo llo w in g are excerpts fro m the a rticle in w h ich Rev. Cleage te lls why (Continued on Page 2) Drop 'Sedition' Charge Against Rights Group N E W O R LE A N S , L a. — “ S e d itio n ” charges have been dismissed against James A . D om bro w ski, execu tive dire cto r o f the S outhern C on ference E duca tio na l F und, B e n ja m in E. S m ith , SCEF trea sure r, and B ru ce C. W a ltzer. The th re e w e re arrested Oct. 4 b y Lou isia na and New O rleans police at the behest o f th e L ouisiana C om m ittee on U n -A m e ric a n A c tiv itie s and th e ir homes and offices searched. Judge B e rn a rd J. Cocke ru le d Oct. 25 th a t th e state had fa ile d to produce a single fa c t to ju s tify its ac tions against th e SCEF. Page Tw o T H E M IL IT A N T ... Detroit Civil Rights Parley (C ontinued fro m Page 1) he resigned fro m DCHR. F o r the com plete a rticle w rite to Illu s tra t ed News, 5385 L o ve tt, D e tro it 10. *** The Reverend A lb e rt B. Cleage, J r., announced his resignation fro m the executive board and the Conference p la n nin g com m ittee of th e D e tro it C ouncil fo r H um an R ights fo llo w in g a special board m eeting on last Tuesday evening in the N ew B ethel B a p tis t Church. M r. Cleage, w ho headed up the p la n nin g com m ittee fo r the N o rth ern Negro Leadership Conference, stated th a t he could n o t accept the lim ita tio n w h ic h the Rev. C. L. F ra n k lin , chairm an o f the DCHR, a r b itr a r ily sought to impose upon th e Conference and the pla n nin g com m ittee. The o rig in a l Conference plans, approved b y the board, authorized an “ open Conference” to w hich delegates fro m a ll Negro organiza tio n s in a ll N o rth e rn urban cen ters w ou ld be welcome. I t was agreed th a t any re a lis tic attem pt to develop a p ra ctica l basis fo r N egro u n ity and cooperation in the N o rth could o nly be achieved upon the basis o f free and open discussion and decision b y in d i v id u a ls representing a ll shades o f N egro opinion. F o u r basic areas o f concern w ere selected fo r discussion be cause th e y offered possibilities fo r th e developm ent o f a u n ifie d p ro g ram o f concerted action. L o o king to w a rd unite d p o litic a l action fo r ’64, the discussion was to have centered around an e valuation of th e Freedom N ow P a rty. In the area o f economic action the dis cussion was to have centered around a selective patronage against General M otors and the C hristm as boycott. In addition, w orkshops dealing w ith de facto segregation in N o rth e rn schools and methods o f com bating housing discrim in a tio n w e re to have been included. Voiced Fears A t the D C H R board m eeting the Reverend M r. F ra n k lin voiced his fears th a t the Leadership Con ference m ig h t be in filtra te d by “ b la ck nationalists and other ra d ic a l groups” fro m the East w ho w o u ld h old positions on social, p o litic a l and economic issues w ith w h ic h he could n o t agree. “ This m ust be prevented at a ll costs,” he insisted. W hen in q u iry was made as to the mechanics by w h ic h he hoped to con tro l the ac tio n s o f delegates to the Con ference, he had no answer b u t re p lie d th a t i t m ust be done to p re ve n t any Conference endorse m e n t of the Freedom N ow P a rty because as D C H R ch a irm a n he “ could n o t a ffo rd to be labeled a b la ck n a tio n a list lik e M arcus G a r vey.” Rev. Cleage pointed o u t th a t he belonged to the Freedom Now P a rty and had in v ite d A tto rn e y Conrad L y n n and W illia m W o rth y , n a tio n a l leaders o f the Freedom N o w P a rty , to the Conference w ith the consent of the board. M r. C H IC A G O T H E N H U F R O N T IE R — U .S. Im p e ria lis m in S o u th V ie tn a m . S peaker, J o y c e D a n ie ls. Fri., N o v . 8, 8 p .m . Debs H a ll, R oom 210, 302 S o u th C a n a l St. A u s p . F rid a y N ig h t S o c ia lis t Forum . • N EW YORK CAUSES A N D C O N SEQ U ENC ES O F T H E SI N O -S O V IE T RIFT. S p e ake r, Tom K e rry , e d ito r, In te rn a tio n a l S o c ia lis t Re v ie w . F ri., N o v . 8, 8 :3 0 p .m . 116 U n iv e r s ity P lace. C o n tr ib . $1 (s tu d e n ts , 5 0 c .). A u s p . M ilit a n t L a b o r Fo ru m . S A N D IE G O C L IF T O N DE BERRY, S o c ia lis t W o r k e rs c a n d id a te to r N e w Y o rk C it y C o u n c il, speaks o n The N e g r o R e v o lu tio n . Tues., N o v . 19, 8 p.m ., Elks H a ll, c o rn e r H e n s le y & C o m m e rc ia l (w e s t o f 2 8th S t.) A u s p . San D ie g o L a b o r Fo ru m . tio n threatens the p o litic a l status quo w h ich offers the Negro no hope fo r the fu tu re . The w h ite man m ust fig h t this k in d o f e f fe ctive action. S later K in g ’s can didacy in A lb a n y, Ga., frightened the e n tire South. G lo ria R ic h a rd son’s refusal to support a re fe re n dum on c o n s titu tio n a lly guaran teed c iv il rig h ts fo r the Negro also frig h te n e d the w h ite com m unity, as does the D e tro it Negro’s op position to m illa g e u n til Negro c h ild re n are given equal educa tio n o p p ortunities in the D e tro it schools. The em pty protest o f the freedom m arch m ust now be re placed by such e ffe ctive economic boycotts as the proposed n ational C hristm as boycott. Rev. A lb ert B. Cleage, Jr. F ra n k lin insisted th a t the Con ference could not consider the Freedom N ow P a rty n o r could i t c ritic iz e the philosophy of non violence. M r. Cleage pointed out th a t Negroes everyw here are ques tio n in g the p ra c tic a lity o f a p h ilo sophy o f non-violence w h ic h p re cludes the p o s s ib ility o f se lf-d e fense. The Rev. M r. F ra n k lin stat ed th a t he had been disgusted by an a rtic le in the L ib e ra to r maga zine c ritic iz in g D r. K in g ’s p h ilo sophy and strategy. M r. Cleage advised th a t the e d ito r o f the L ib e rator has accepted an in v ita tio n to serve on the Conference ad v is o ry comm ittee. Protested Change D C H R board members protested the sudden change in Conference p o licy, and the m eeting adjourned in general confusion. In e xp la in in g his resignation M r. Cleage stated th a t in his o p in ion the D CH R has already o u t liv e d its v e ry lim ite d usefulness. I t lacked the vision necessary to m a in ta in the fle e tin g spectacular June 23 Freedom M arch, and es se n tia lly the Freedom M a rch i t self was a h o llo w th in g w ith o u t substance. The same fe a r o f offending w h ite people w h ic h crow ded its f ir s t p la tfo rm w ith w h ite “ lib erals,” la b o r leaders and p o lit icians, now forces i t to repudiate the b la ck re v o lu tio n and the as p ira tio n s o f b lack m en and women w ho fig h t to be free. The D CH R cannot stop inde pendent Negro p o litic a l action by fo rb id d in g discussion o f the Free dom N ow P a rty n o r can the D CH R destroy the black m an’s new image o f h im s e lf by c a llin g i t “ b lack na tio n a lism .” The D C H R can o n ly destroy its e lf in a fu tile e ffo rt to c u rry the fa v o r of the w h ite press and the w h ite com m unity. L ik e P ra irie F ire The Negro re v o lt sweeps across the nation lik e a p ra irie fire , M r. Cleage stated. E ve ryw h e re the Negro masses are dem anding FREEDO M NOW , and th e y are w illin g to m arch, to protest, to sacrifice and to go to ja il i f need be in support of th e ir demands. H ow ever, m uch o f its energy is being dissipated in em pty gestures designed o n ly to dram atize the fa c t o f protest . . . The DCHR faces the basic deci sion w h ic h m ust be faced b y ev e ry Negro c iv il-rig h ts organiza tio n . The em pty protest o f the freedom m arch and the mass ra lly m ust be replaced b y independent black p o litic a l action, and by regional and n a tio n a l economic action by u n ite d Negro com m uni ties. E ffe c tiv e u n ite d action m ust also be taken in the areas of school and housing d iscrim in a tio n . The instrum ents fo r e ffe ctive ac tio n are ready at hand b u t Negro “ leaders” are being frig h te n e d by a concerted cam paign in the w h ite c o m m u n ity to m ake the Freedom N ow P a rty appear dangerous and subversive. Independent Negro p o litic a l ac Lum ped Together A ll o f these e ffective in s tru ments fo r Negro lib e ra tio n are lum ped together and called “ black n a tio n a lism ” and Negro “ leaders” are cautioned to avoid them at any cost. B u t the Negro masses have learned th a t th e y have the pow er to force concessions in those areas o f A m erican life fro m w h ich they are excluded o r in w h ic h they are denied e q u a lity o f o p p o rtu n ity thro u g h the use of p o litic a l and economic sanctions. Negro organ izations m ust recognize th is pow er and be w illin g to use i t fo r the accom plishm ent of Negro objec tives. “ In renouncing the independent b la ck p o litic a l action represented by the Freedom N ow P a rty and the new Negro image w h ich is called ‘black na tio n a lism ,’ the D CH R has renounced any reason fo r its existence,” M r. Cleage con cluded. D E T R O IT — Rev. A lb e rt B. Cleage has accepted the state chairm anship o f the M ichigan Com m ittee fo r a Freedom N ow P a rty. The com m ittee also an nounced th a t the State B oard o f Elections has approved its p e titio n fo rm and com m ittee supporters are now opening a d riv e to secure the signatures o f 30,000 voters in the state (double the required m in im u m ) in order to place a Ne gro tic k e t on the state b a llo t fo r the 1964 elections. Ban U.S. Travel by 2 Indicted for Cuba Trip N EW Y O R K — T w o o f the stu dents in d icte d fo r tra v e l to Cuba have been fo rb id d e n b y a fe d e ra l judge to tra v e l w ith in th e ir own co u n try to speak on th e ir case. The judge had p re vio u sly ru le d th a t the tw o students, P h illip Luce and L e v i Laub, could not leave N ew Y o rk C ity w h ile they are u n der bond on the in d ic t ments. Leonard B. B oudin, counsel fo r the students, file d b rie fs Oct. 28 asking the judge to reconsider the re strictio n , b u t fe d e ra l dis tr ic t a tto rn e y F ra n k H oey said the governm ent doesn’t w a n t the stu dents m a kin g speaking tours chal lenging the c o n s titu tio n a lity o f the tra v e l ban. The governm ent re fused to file b rie fs on the ques tio n u n til a fte r Nov. 7, so the ru lin g stands fo r the tim e being. T h is prevents appearances b y the students, said Luce, on a to u r o f East Coast colleges u n der spon sorship o f the N a tio n a l S tudent Association. I t also prevents them appearing at a m eeting sched uled at the U n iv e rs ity o f Chicago Nov. 8. “ O ur voices w ill be heard in Chicago, how ever,” said Luce. “ W e’l l use a tape recorder and w e’l l ta lk precisely on how the tra v e l ban is an u n co n stitu tio n a l outrage.” In another developm ent, charges o f felonious assault against Fred Jerome, e d ito r o f Progressive Labor, w ere dismissed Oct. 25. The com plainant fa ile d to appear in court. Jerome was accused of in ju rin g a Cuban c o u n te rre vo lu tio n a ry w ho had attem pted to dis ru p t a m eeting at T ow n H a ll here Sept. 15 at w h ic h the in d icte d stu dents spoke. M onday, N ovem ber 4, 1963 'N o More Cheeks to Turn' Says Group in Ann Arbor B y R. C a u lfie ld A N N ARBOR, M ich. — Am ong the m any m ilita n t Negro na tio n a lis t organizations springing up around the co u n try is the A nn A rb o r D irect A ctio n Com m ittee. D AC is made up p rim a rily of young Negro students and w o rk ers. F o r i t the key weapon in the Negro struggle fo r equ a lity, ju s tice and jobs is protest actions. W hen com plaints o f jo b d iscrim in a tio n are b ro u g h t to the com m ittee, i t investigates then nego tiates. I f its demands are not met, i t is ready to engage in protest dem onstrations. D AC has held jo in t picket lines w ith D e tro it’s m ilita n t c iv il-rig h ts organizations, U huru. D A C evolved as the action arm o f the A nn A rb o r F riends o f the S tudent N onviolent C o-ordinating ... CHICAGO (Continued from Page 1) symbolizes was a dem onstration b y some ten to 20 thousand m archers at C ity H a ll and the B oard o f Education b u ild in g late Tuesday afternoon. The marchers, m ostly grade and hig h school stu dents and adults, circled C ity H a ll c a rry in g p icke t signs and then b ro u g h t rush h o u r tr a ffic to a sta n d still w h ile ja m m in g the side w a lk and street at the fro n t o f the B oard o f Education b u ild in g w here th ey w ere addressed b y c iv il rig h ts leaders o f local and national prom inence, in c lu d in g James F o r man, D ic k G regory, Law rence L a n d ry , Rose Simpson and rep resentatives o f N A A C P . The ca ll fo r rem oval o f W illis was the p o in t most emphasized b y the chants and signs o f the s p irite d demonstrators. H ow ever th ey also made clear th e ir opposi tio n to the School Board, M ayor Daley, and Chicago’s J im Crow school system w ith such slogans as “ Freedom fro m W illis and his B o o t-L ic k in g School B oard,” “ W il lis D ow n Now, D aley D ow n L a t er,” “ Do A w a y w ith G hetto Schools.” The S tudent Advocates o f N e gro H is to ry ca rrie d signs reading “ W illis — W allace — W h a t’s the D ifference?,” “ H is to ry is n o t A llW hite. Teach us about the B lack M a n !” “ Teach us about F rede r ic k Douglas, H a rrie t Tubm an, Ida W ells.” O ther signs called fo r a break w ith the D em ocratic and Repub lic a n representatives o f the w h ite pow er stru ctu re b y b u ild in g an a ll-b la c k Freedom N ow P arty. Several thousand copies o f the C a ll fo r a Freedom N ow P a rty w ere d istrib u te d b y representa tives o f the C om m ittee fo r a Freedom N ow P a rty. T hey stated th a t response was enthusiastic. C om m ittee around a local case of police b ru ta lity . A n A nn A rb o r cop shot a young Negro in the back because he thou ght the yo u th had stolen his b ro th e r’s car. L u c k ily the yo u th lived. No dis c ip lin a ry action was taken against the cop u n til D A C dem onstrated three weeks la te r against police b ru ta lity . On th a t day the cop suddenly resigned. D A C ’s n e x t success was w ith the c ity ’s three A & P stores. A fte r investigation and considerable negotiation, D A C threatened to demonstrate against the chain. The stores im m e d ia te ly changed th e ir racist p o licy and began h irin g Negroes fo r responsible positions. In D A C ’s n e w ly adopted pro gram there are three im p o rta n t points. 1) Its members consider themselves a Negro vanguard try in g to organize A n n A rb o r blacks against w h ite oppression. 2) T hey believe in organized se lfdefense. T hey say, “ We have no more cheeks to tu rn ; i f we are a t tacked w e w ill defend ourselves.” 3) T hey are fo r independent po litic a l action and the Freedom N ow P a rty. T hey feel th a t p o liti cal action is the o n ly w ay th a t the Negro people w ill re a lly be able to gain e q uality, justice and jobs. C h arlie Thomas, chairm an o f D AC , feels th a t '400 years o f w a it in g and hoping are already too m any. “ We have no need fo r steer in g comm ittees and discussion clubs. We need action. Democrats, R epublicans and w h ite lib e ra ls have a ll sold us dow n the dra in. W e m ust begin to organize to lead ou r struggle. B la ck people m ust decide th e ir ow n fu tu re .” Cleveland Teacher Gives Series on Negro History C L E V E L A N D — A series o f six Sunday n ig h t lectures on “ The H is to ry o f the Negro in the U n ited States” are being given here by B ernard M andel, author o f Labor: Free and Slave and a biog rap hy o f Samuel Gompers. D r. M andel, a teacher and presi dent o f the Cleveland Negro H is to ry Association, w ill in dicate in these ta lks the e xte n t to w h ich the role o f the Negro in A m erica n h is to ry has been distorted and denigrated, when n o t com pletely ignored, in h isto ry books. The demand fo r integrated schools, his lectures p o in t up, means n o t o n ly physical in te g ra tio n b u t recognition th a t the h is to ry lessons ta u g h t ou r ch ild re n are incom plete and biased and m ust be changed to in clude the contrib u tio n s o f the Negro people. The lectures are being given a t Debs H a ll, 5927 E u clid Ave., at 7:30 p.m. each Sunday, co n tin u in g thro u g h December 1st. THE Wanted: New Name for Labor Bureaucrats MILITANT B y G eorge B re itm a n E d ito r: JO S E P H H A N S E N M anagin g E d ito r: G E O R G E L A V A N Business M anager: K A R O L Y N K E R R Y Published w e e k ly , except d u rin g J u ly and A ugu st w h en published b i-w e e k ly , by T h e M ilita n t P u b lishing Ass’n., 116 U n iv e rs ity P I., N e w Y o rk 3, N .Y . Phone C H 3-2140. Second-class postage paid at N e w Y o rk , N .Y . Subscription: $3 a year; C anadian, $3.50; foreign , $4.50. Signed articles by contributors do not necessarily represent T h e M ilit a n t’s view s. These are expressed in editorials. V o l. 27 - N o. 39 < *@ *> 3 4 5 M o n d a y . N o v e m b e r 4, 1963 Lift the Blockade T w o days a fte r Cuban P re m ie r F ide l Castro placed the U.S. g overnm ent “ on t r ia l before w o rld o p in io n ” to end its c rim in a l economic blockade o f the d isa ste r-stricke n isla n d w h ic h had s u f fered fiv e days o f u n p a ra lle le d d estructio n b y H u rric a n e F lora, the State D e p a rtm e n t announced w ith cold b r u ta lity th a t the blockade w o u ld go on. I t ’s reason? C uba’s alleged “ e ffo rts to o v e rth ro w governm ents in th is hem isphere b y violence, te rro r and subversion.” B u t th e w o rld know s th a t i t has been the men in W ashington, n o t Havana, w ho are g u ilty o f this. T hey sponsored th e B a y of Pigs inva sion and threatened a fu ll-s c a le inva sion o f Cuba last year. T he K e n n e d y a d m in is tra tio n uses its economic, m ilita r y and d ip lo m a tic m ig h t to t r y to b rin g d ow n th e C uban governm ent. In a d d itio n to b a rrin g U.S. trade, W ashington continues its p o lic y o f economic b la c k m a il against a ny W estern c o u n try th a t engages in sh ip p in g to Cuba. T his slows dow n th e sh ip m e n t o f aid fro m those countries th a t do w a n t to h e lp th e Cuban people in th e ir h o u r o f g re at need. T h e present s itu a tio n rip s th e masks o ff the h ypocrites in W ashington — fro m K e nn e dy on dow n — w ho p io u s ly declare th e y are o n ly opposed to the Castro g overnm ent and don’t w a n t to do a n y th in g to h a rm the Cuban people. T he C uban people have suffered one o f the w o rs t n a tu ra l catastrophes o f recent tim es. The floods w ip e d o u t e n tire towns, dem olished a large p a rt o f the is la n d ’s crops, destroyed roads and sewage systems. Y e t the Cuban people do n o t ask fo r c h a rity to overcome th is disaster. T h e y w elcom e w ith g ra titu d e a ll h elp fre e ly given. B u t a ll th e y ask o f th e g overnm ent of th e U.S. is th a t i t p e rm it freedom o f th e seas to those w ho do w a n t to ship needed m ate ria ls to th e ir co un try. On the basis o f e lem entary hum an compassion alone, the A m e ric a n people should speak o u t and dem and an end to W ash in g to n ’s b a rb a ric e ffo rts to e x p lo it the h u rric a n e devastation fo r its re a c tio n a ry ends. In th e tra d itio n o f fa ir p la y and sim p le de cency, A m ericans o f a ll p o litic a l vie w p o in ts should jo in in de m anding o f the K ennedy a d m in is tra tio n : Don’t stand in the w a y o f a id to Cuba. L IF T T H E E M B A R G O ! Drive Nets 800 New Militant Subs In 2 Weeks; Chicago Sets the Pace B y K a ro ly n K e rry The response to our appeal in the Oct. 21 issue o f The M ilita n t to complete ou r campagin quota o f 5,000 new subscribers b y Nov. 15 — one m onth in advance of the o rig in a l deadline of Dec. 15 — has been most g ra tify in g . In the tw o week period fro m Oct. 21 throug h Oct. 30 we re ceived a p p ro xim a te ly 800 in tro d u ctory subscriptions. In a ddi tion, a num ber o f area groups have v o lu n ta rily raised th e ir o rig in a l quotas, lif tin g o u r to ta l accepted quota to over 6,000. The Chicago group, pace-set ters fro m the beginning, has doubled its quota — fro m 750 to 1,500. Sub d ire c to r Bev w rite s: “ We discussed the sub quota last week and decided to double it. The w a y things are looking now, we w ill have no tro u b le at a ll m eeting the new quota. C h i cago w o uld lik e to challenge a ll o ther cities to double th e ir quotas too. C e rta in ly we are no excep tio n and I ’m sure the y are now fin d in g out, as we did, how easy i t is to get in tro d u c to ry subs to The M ilita n t.” In lin e w ith the Chicago action o ther areas have already upped th e ir quotas. N ew ark, w h ic h be gan w ith a quota o f 150, has a l ready exceeded th a t num ber and has raised its quota to 250. San Diego, w ith an o rig in a l quota of 50, w e n t over the top and doubled i t w ith a new target o f 100. D enver jum ped fro m 25 to 150 a fte r exceeding its in itia l quota. D e tro it lifte d its quota fro m 500 to 650. A ll of the above-m entioned areas are con fide nt they can meet th e ir new and hig h er quotas by Nov. 15, the 35th A n n iv e rs a ry date o f The M ilita n t. I t is th is Page T hree T H E M IL IT A N T M onday, N ovem ber 4, 1963 s p irit th a t im pels us to pre d ict th a t we can a ll lo o k fo rw a rd to com m em orating 35 years o f p u b lica tio n by being able to announce th a t we have added 5,000 new readers to our roster on target date: Nov. 15. Most encouraging are the subs and comments fro m areas w here there are no organized groups and w hich are listed in the scoreboard under the designation: “ G eneral.” T yp ica l of the observations made are th a t The M ilita n t is unique in its coverage o f the c iv il rig h ts struggle and as a paper of record p u b lish in g im p o rta n t texts of speeches and pronouncements by leaders o f the Cuban re vo lu tio n . We w o u ld lik e to hear fro m a ll areas w h a t th e ir response w ill be to the Chicago challenge. Espe c ia lly fro m those areas w h ich are s till lagging v e ry b a d ly be h ind. City Quota Total Chicago 1500 1177 N ew Y o rk 1000 780 D e tro it 650 461 T w in Cities 207 300 N ew ark 250 180 Boston 155 250 O a k la n d /B e rk e ly 375 110 Cleveland 100 99 San Diego 100 83 M ilw a u ke e 150 73 Madison 71 100 Seattle 68 100 P h iladelphia 150 67 San Francisco 250 38 A n n A rb o r 50 31 D enver 150 31 B a ltim o re 22 50 Los Angeles 21 500 Connecticut 75 9 St. Louis 4 15 General 111 T o ta l (O ct. 30) 6115 3798 D E T R O IT — W ould some thought and a ttention re su lt in the coining of a term to describe the misleaders o f the labor m ove m ent th a t w ould be as apt and p opular as “ U ncle T om ” is fo r misleaders of the Negro struggle? I f so, le t us give i t the necessary thought and attention. Because the p o p u la rity o f the term “ U ncle T om ” is n o t o n ly a re su lt o f the long struggle fo r e q u a lity — it is also a weapon in the mass com m unication o f ideas to prom ote th a t struggle. I t is a weapon of ex posure and rid ic u le , ju s t as badly needed in the unions today as in the Negro movement. O f course there are disagree ments about the use o r misuse o f “ U ncle Tom .” P. L . P ra ttis , in the Sept. 21 P ittsb u rg h C ourier, com plains th a t the character in H a rrie t Beecher Stowe’s novel re a lly was a fin e fe llo w , and th a t i t is u n fa ir to ap p ly his name to compromisers, opportunists and tra ito rs . Cleage’s Definition Rev. A lb e rt B. Cleage, in the course o f a p enetrating a rtic le on the dilem m a o f b la ck leadership in the Sept. 16 Illu s tra te d News, argues that, s tric tly speaking, an U ncle Tom is one w h o deliberate ly and fo r his own personal gain betrays the N egro’s best interests, and th a t com prom isers and grad ualists don’t deserve the name u n less th a t elem ent o f personal gain is involved. (H e concludes, h ow ever, th a t g ra d u a list leaders w ho can’t understand the new moods of the Negro masses deserve to be called U ncle Tom, i f o n ly as a punishm ent fo r being slo w w itte d .) The use of the te rm has now been debated in a co urtroom too. O n Oct. 16 a ju r y in A k ro n ru le d th a t i t is a libelous te rm w hen applied to a Negro and awarded B e rth a B. M oore $32,000 in dam ages against a Negro w eekly, the C leveland C a ll and Post. George “............ ” Meany associating o r dealing w ith her.” They decided th a t i t did. I f the A k ro n ju r y decision is upheld in the courts generally, i t m ay m ake people a little more cautious about using the te rm in w ritin g . B u t i t w ill n o t m ake i t any less pop u la r among the Negro masses. They are not m uch in terested in fin e points about its h isto ry, etc. T hey know w h a t it means and how to use i t appro p ria te ly . The U ncle Toms know w h a t i t means too and ho w effec tiv e i t can be; and so do a ll the aspirants to leadership and in fluence in the Negro com m unity. B u t le t me get back to the p o in t I started out w ith : Can’t we fin d a s im ila rly appropriate name fo r the present leaders o f the la bor movement? As a type, they ce rta in ly are c le a rly distinguishable. George M eany and W a lte r R euther have d iffe re n t styles and d iffe re n t backgrounds. B u t on the basic things th e y are alike. T hey are as subservient to the c a p ita list class as any U ncle Tom ever was to his master. T hey dampen, discourage and stamp out ra n k and file m ilita n c y w h ere ver th e y can. T hey believe in, ad vocate and practice m oderation, compromise w ith the employers M rs. Moore, a local Dem ocratic P a rty vice chairm an and state auto license re g istra r, charged the C a ll and Post w ith fa lse ly re p o rt ing th a t ex-G ov. D iS alle, also a Dem ocrat, had called her an U ncle Tom at a m eeting in 1962. D iS alle supported her version b y deposing th a t he had not called her a Tom. In the fiv e -d a y tr ia l, Mrs. Moore said an U ncle Tom is one w ho “ sells o u t” his convictions and others of his race fo r money, prestige o r p o litic a l preference. The C a ll and Post publisher, W il lia m O. W alker, argued th a t the te rm means “ one w ith w hom you disagree” b u t im plies no d is lo y a l ty to the Negro race. The judge asked the ju r y ( a llw h ite !) to decide w h e th e r the term was derogatory and im puted to M rs. Moore “ conduct th a t tends to h a rm h e r re p u ta tio n and lo w e r h e r in the estim ation of the com m u n ity and deters persons fro m There have been o ther attem pts. “ P iecard” is one. “ Porkchopper” is another. F o r some reason th e y never caught on w id e ly. T hey are s till used in certain unions and cities, b u t n o t gene ra lly. I am not cla im in g th a t fin d in g the rig h t name fo r the union lead ers w ill m ake the la b o r m ove m ent as m ilita n t as the Negro m ovem ent has become; obviously, m ore than a new name is needed. B u t every lit tle b it helps. A n d i f someone can h it on a name fo r the Meanys and Reuthers as f i t tin g as U ncle Tom, w h ic h w ill help to expose them and lo w e r them “ in the estim ation o f the co m m u n ity” and “ deter persons fro m associating or dealing” w ith them, he w ill be doing a service to the labor, c iv il rig h ts and ra d ical movements. Cleveland Ups the A n te B y M a rv e l Scholl Fund D ire cto r Good news fro m Cleveland this week — an increase in th e ir quota fro m $500 to $650! A n d they pledged th is increase even though i t dropped them three per centage points and p u t them n ext to the bottom o f the lis t. B u t w ith such s p irit we are certain they w ill soon be v y in g w ith Chicago fo r top b illin g . The rest o f the news this week was not so good, as noted in the scoreboard below. Since last week we increased o n ly three percent. Since the Fund tim e-span is m ore than h a lf over i t behooves our frie n ds to h u rry a b it. I w ould lik e to m ake a special appeal this w eek to those read ers of The M ilita n t w ho have been subscribers fo r a long, long tim e. Fund Scoreboard Totals to Oct. 28 Other Attempts Socialist Education Fund False Report? City Chicago General M ilw a u ke e M inneapolis-S t. Paul St. Louis C onnecticut N ew Y o rk D e tro it Boston O a kland-B erkeley San Francisco Los Angeles Seattle San Diego D enver P h iladelphia N e w a rk C leveland A lle n to w n and gradualism in th e ir m ost b la ta n t form s. They tr y to p re ven t strikes. T hey re s tric t unio n dem ocracy. They are u n w illin g o r afra id to fig h t racia l d iscrim in a tion. They tu rn la b o r in to a ta il on the D em ocratic donkey. They defend and support e very tw is t and tu rn in U.S. im p e ria lis t fo r eign policy. A n d fo r th e ir be trayals of the w orkers’ interests, they are rew arded w ith enough “ money, prestige or p o litic a l pre ference” so th a t they constitute a caste separate and apart fro m the w o rk in g people in conduct and consciousness. W hat should th is type o f union leader be called? I t was D aniel De Leon, I be lieve, w ho introduced the expres sion “ la b o r lieutenants o f the cap ita lis t class.” S c ie n tifica lly, th is is correct and even good. B u t i t ’s n o t the k in d o f te rm th a t ro lls o ff yo u r tongue easily. I t ’s too long. I t ’s n o t c o lo rfu l enough. The same criticism s app ly to the te rm “ la bor bureaucracy” w h ich seems to be favored b y w rite rs fo r The M ilita n t. Quota 1,300 100 250 850 100 Paid Percent 700 54 132 425 50 54 54 53 50 50 44 38 36 34 30 200 88 4,300 700 600 600 850 4,300 500 300 300 1,634 251 205 179 130 870 85 42 13 38 200 22 650 150 00 17 14 13 13 11 9 00 $16,150 $4,978 31 100 60 Most o f you respond generously to ou r fu n d appeals. Y ou re cognize th a t this is one w a y you can continue to do y o u r share in helping to educate the new young generation w hich is ju s t now aw akening to the need fo r a basic social change in this country, i f any of the real problem s are to be solved — c iv il lib e rtie s and equal rig h ts fo r the em battled Ne gro people; c iv il rig h ts and lib erties fo r a ll the rest of us — the rig h t to tra ve l, fo r instance; a solution to the g ro w in g p roblem of unem ploym ent as w orkers are displaced by push-buttons; M e d i care fo r the aged; be tte r schools fo r o u r ch ild re n ; adequate hous ing at reasonable rents so th a t w orkers w ill n o t have to liv e in ra t- and roach-infested slums. Young people n e w ly awakened to the socialist answer to these problem s are w o n d erfu l. T h e ir verve and energy is inexhaustible. B u t unless they develop a solid u n derstanding o f w h a t th e y are do in g and w hy, and how , m uch o f th is energy and enthusiasm can be dissipated. Y o u r dollars can m ake the difference in th is nec essary educational process. Send yo u r co n trib u tio n s to 116 U n iv e rs ity Place, N ew Y o rk , N .Y . 10003. A n d send them now. 20 20 How Cuba Uprooted Race Discrimination B y H a r r y R in g 16 pages 15 cents P ioneer Publishers 116 University Place N ew Y ork 3, N . Y . Page Four T H E M IL IT A N T — M A n Answer to the Chinese Comm e o ia s fn tL ru S D d l' B y E . G e rm ain T he a rtic le “ On the Question o f S ta lin ,” published September 13 b y the jo in t e d ito ria l boards o f the P eking People’s D a ily and Red F lag as the second in a series o f answers to the “ Open L e tte r of the C e ntral C om m ittee o f the CPSU,” [C om m unist p a rty o f the S oviet U n io n ] is undoubtedly the w o rst c o n trib u tio n o f the Chinese C om m unist P a rty [C C P ] in the present discussion in the w o rld C om m unist m ovem ent, the one w h ic h does most damage to the fa vo ra ble reception given up to now to the CCP and the one w h ic h m ost seriously hinders the p ro gress o f C om m unist cadres and m ilita n ts tow ards re v o lu tio n a ry M a rx is m insofa r as i t is being ad vanced b y this discussion. F u ll o f factual e rrors and dis tortions, i t is also loaded w ith contradictions e ith e r w ith in the a rtic le its e lf or w ith other im p o r ta n t documents o f the CCP or re cent declarations made by Mao T se-tung. B u t the m ost s trik in g aspect of the a rticle is its com plete divorce fro m re a lity . Nobody w ith the slightest know ledge of the opinions o r aspirations of the masses inside the S oviet U nion or the East E u ropean w o rke rs states can take seriously a statem ent lik e th is: “ T h is great m a jo rity o f the Soviet people disapprove o f such abuse o f S talin. T hey increasingly [ ! ] cherish the m em ory o f S ta lin .” A n y attem pt by the leaders of the CCP to b u ild th e ir tendency w ith in the w o rld C om m unist m ovem ent on such a lin e can o n ly lead to ra p id and increasing isola tio n , g re a tly fa c ilita tin g the e ffo rts o f the K hrush che vite tendency to re-establish m o n o lith ism and some k in d o f ce ntral bureaucratic con tr o l over the greater p a rt o f the w o rld C om m unist m ovem ent. We are convinced th a t the lead ers and members o f the le ft-w in g oppositional tendencies inside the CPs o f the colonial and im p e ria l is t countries w ill also ra p id ly dis cover th is through th e ir ow n ex perience. We are convinced th a t th e y w ill w a rn th e ir Chinese com rades w ith increasing insistence th a t a fig h t against rig h t-w in g re v isio n ism th a t at the same tim e attem pts to re vive the c u lt o f S ta lin is doomed fro m the begin n in g . We are convinced th a t th e y w il l raise the slogan, “ In the fig h t against K hrushchev’s revisionism , le t’s n o t go back to S ta lin b u t m ove fo rw a rd to fu ll-fle d g e d L e n inism .” A n d we are convinced th a t w ith the help of experience and fra te rn a l discussion, th is slogan w ill fin d increasing echoes w ith in the Chinese CP its e lf, in c lu d in g its leadership. F o r th a t reason, we th in k i t w o rth w h ile to s u b m it the a rticle “ On the Ques tio n o f S ta lin ” to m uch m ore searching c ritic is m than i t in s trin s ic a lly deserves in hope th a t i t w ill help speed the process o f c la rific a tio n among le ft-w in g Communists, in China as w e ll as everyw here else. Some o f the argum ents advanced in the a rticle “ On the Question o f Moscow vs. Peking The Meaning O f the G r e a t Debate By W illiam F. W arde T he f ir s t c o m p re h e n s iv e a p p ra is a l o f th e S in o -S o v ie t d is p u te fro m a M a rx is t s ta n d p o in t 50 cents PIONEER PUBLISHERS 1 16 University Place New York 3, N . Y. S ta lin ” are so self-defeating th a t th e y seem alm ost naive. The au thors w rite : “ K hrushchev has m aligned Sta lin as a ‘despot o f the type o f Iva n the T e rrib le .’ Does not th is mean th a t the experience o f the great CPSU and the great Soviet people p rovided over 30 years fo r peo ples the w o rld over was n o t the experience o f the d icta to rsh ip o f the p ro le ta ria t, b u t th a t o f life under the ru le o f a feudal ‘des p o t’ ? . . . K hrushchev has m aligned S ta lin as a ‘fo o l.’ Does not th is mean th a t the CPSU, w h ich waged heroic re v o lu tio n a ry stru g gles over the past decades, had a ‘fo o l’ as its leader?” T hey seem to fo rg e t a detail. T he Soviet people and the CPSU have been led fo r n e a rly ten years now b y a group headed by K h ru sh ch e v w hom th is v e ry same a rtic le denounces as a slanderer, a m aligner, a fa ls ifie r o f histo ry, a fool, a coward, a s p litte r o f the w o rld C om m unist m ovem ent, an o bjective agent o f revisionism th a t serves as a bourgeois agency w ith in the w o rkin g -cla ss m ove m ent. O th e r CCP documents have compared K hrushchev and his group to the so cia l-p a trio ts of 1914 w hom L e n in term ed “ b o u r geois agents w ith in the w o rk in g class m ovem ent.” Y e t these repel le n t figures have been a t the head o f the CPSU fo r some ten years and have been p a rt o f the top leadership o f the S oviet U nion fo r 30 years! W h y should this be as sumed to be a se lf-a p p a re n t ab s u rd ity in the case o f S ta lin and yet be taken as p e rfe c tly logical in the case o f K hrushchev? The authors o f the a rtic le “ On the Question o f S ta lin ” say th a t K hrushchev m aligned S ta lin in his secret speech at the T w e n tie th Stalin Congress of the CPSU w hen he adm itted th a t S ta lin had m urdered the m ain cadres o f L e n in ’s B o l shevik p a rty . T h e y dare to say th a t th is admission is a “ d is to r tio n o f h isto ric tru th .” B u t facts are facts! L e t the leaders o f the Chinese CP answer these ques tions: Yes o r no, d id S ta lin execute the m a jo rity o f the members of the L e n in is t C entral C om m ittee th a t led the October R evolution, founded the S oviet state and the T h ird In te rn a tio n a l, and w on the C iv il War? Yes o r no, w ere these great C om m unist leaders m urdered u n der the v ile slander and absurd accusation th a t th e y w ere “ spies and agents o f fascism and im p e ria lism ” n o t o n ly fro m the m o m ent they opposed S ta lin b u t even before the fir s t w o rld war? Yes o r no, did S ta lin m u rd e r not o n ly thousands o f Communists in the p o litic a l opposition b u t also the m a jo rity o f delegates to the F ifte e n th and S ixteenth p a rty congresses o f the CPSU; i.e., the m a jo rity o f C om m unist cadres w ho had supported h im against the T ro ts k y is t Opposition b u t who w ere s till too m uch tied to the o ld B olshevik tra d itio n to accept the monstrous Moscow tria ls and the system atic use o f lies, slander and physical violence to “ solve” in n e r-p a rty discussions? We venture to p re d ic t th a t the authors o f the a rtic le “ On the Question o f S ta lin ” w ill not a t te m p t to answ er these questions. No honest answer is possible b u t “ yes.” Y e t i f the answer is “ yes,” then i t fo llo w s th a t K hrushchev d id not “ m a lig n ” and “ slander” S ta lin in his secret speech at the T w e n tie th Congress o f the CPSU. W hat he did was to a d m it p a rt of the h is to ric a l tr u th and reveal some fresh details. A gainst this tru th , sophisms evaporate lik e snow in the-sun. T he authors o f the a rtic le even dare to approve an old speech made b y K hrushchev in Ja n u a ry 1937 in w h ic h the present firs t secretary o f the C entral C o m m it tee of the CPSU said of those w ho opposed S ta lin , “ In liftin g th e ir hand against Comrade S ta lin , they lifte d i t against a ll o f us, against the w o rk in g class and the w o rk in g people!” Have the authors o f the a rticle forgotten th a t the firs t one to “ l i f t his hand” against S ta lin was no one b u t L e n in him self? Have they forgotten L e n in ’s testament, in w h ic h the founder of Bolshevism advised the C entral C om m ittee to rem ove S ta lin fro m his post of general secretary? B y m a kin g this ju d g m e n t o f S talin, c a llin g fo r his rem oval, d id L e n in “ l i f t his hand against the w o rk in g class?” “ co unter-revolutionists, spies and fascist agents.” In th a t case, by the logic used b y the leaders of the Chinese CP, he was a fool i f not worse. The banner m ust then be raised fo r the “ re h a b ilita tio n ” o f Len in against the authors of the a rticle as apologists fo r the crim es o f S talin! I f they say “ no,” i f they decide th a t these slaughtered comrades w ere innocent vic tim s o f S ta lin ’s purges, “ innocent people w ro n g ly convicted,” then how can they re duce th is mass slander and mass m u rde r, often accompanied b y mass to rtu re , o f thousands o f old An “Error” The leaders o f the CCP fa ll into another g la rin g contradiction when on the one hand they tr y to defend S ta lin against K h ru shchev’s “ m a lig n in g ” h im as a m u rd e re r and a despot w h ile on the o ther hand th e y themselves state: “ On certain [ ! ] occasions and on certain questions, he [S ta lin ] confused tw o types of contradic tions w h ich are d iffe re n t in na ture, contradictions between o u r selves and the enemy, and con tra d ictio n s among the people, and also confused the d iffe re n t m e th ods needed in h a n d lin g them . In the w o rk led b y S ta lin o f sup pressing the c o u n te r-re vo lu tio n , m any co u n te r-re vo lu tio n a rie s de serving punishm ent w ere d u ly punished. B u t a t the same tim e there were innocent people who w ere w ro n g ly convicted, and in 1937 and 1938 there occurred the e rro r [ ! ] o f enlarging the scope o f the suppression o f counter re vo lu tio n a rie s.” W h a t was the scale o f this “ e r r o r ” ? Z inoviev, fir s t head o f the C om m unist In te rn a tio n a l, was shot as a co u n te r-re vo lu tio n ist. So was B u k h a rin w ho succeeded Z in o vie v as the leading fig u re of the C om intern. So was Kam enev, mem ber o f the L e n in is t P o litic a l Bureau. T ro tsky, fo u n d e r o f the Red A rm y , was m urdered by an agent o f S ta lin . R ykov, another mem ber o f the L e n in is t P o litic a l Bureau and fo rm e r ch ie f o f the S oviet governm ent, was executed as a c o u n te r-re v o lu tio n is t. P iatakov, Radek, S okolnikov, R akovski, Sm ilga, Serebriakov, I. N. S m irnov, M u ra lo v and m any others w ere s im ila rly liquidated. Do the leaders o f the Chinese CP believe th a t a ll these Commu nists, these com rades-in-arm s of L e n in, the m a jo rity o f the m em bers of the C entral Com m ittee in w h ich L e n in sat fro m 1917 to 1923, w ere re a lly c o u n te r-re v o lu tio n aries? Do the leaders o f the Chinese CP believe th a t the top s ta ff o f the Red A rm y , executed a fte r a secret m ock “ tr ia l” in 1937, were re a lly c o u n te r-re v o lu tionaries? Do the leaders o f the Chinese CP believe th a t the m a jo r it y of the delegates o f the F if teenth and S ixteenth congresses of the CPSU were re a lly counter revolutionaries? T h e ir dilem m a is insoluble. I f they say “ yes” then the o n ly pos sible conclusion is that the Soviet U nion was founded by counter re vo lu tio n a rie s and Le n in him self guided the C om m unist p a rty and the S oviet U nion u n til he died w ith the help o f a m a jo rity o f B olsheviks and the m a jo rity of L e n in ’s closest collaborators to a m ere “ e rro r” and react in d ig n a n tly w hen someone speaks the tru th and calls S ta lin w h a t he was, a despot and a m urderer? The authors o f the a rtic le “ On the Question o f S ta lin ” declare: “ K h ru shche v has m aligned S ta lin as ‘the greatest d ic ta to r in Rus sian h is to ry .’ Does th is n o t mean th a t the S oviet people liv e d fo r 30 long years under the ‘ty ra n n y ’ o f the ‘greatest d icta to r in Rus sian h is to ry ,’ and not under the socialist system?” B y stating the question in th is fo rm , the authors o n ly prove th a t they have n o t yet learned how to distin guish be tween the socio-economic founda tions o f society and its p o litic a l superstructure. In the h is to ry o f ca pita lism m any d iffe re n t form s o f state and governm ent have appeared, fro m the extrem es o f autocracy and fascist dicta to rsh ip to w h a t Len in called “ the most advanced form s o f bourgeois dem ocratic republics” (in c lu d in g those in w h ich citizens keep arms in th e ir homes as in S w itzerland or N ineteenth-C en tu r y A m e ric a ). In the Soviet U n ion, capitalism was o ve rth ro w n by the October R evolutio n and has not been restored since. P roperty relations rem ain those o f sociali zation, o f a tra n sitio n tow ards socialism. The bourgeoisie has com pletely disappeared as a class. B u t ju s t as p o litic a l counter re vo lu tio ns proved possible a fte r the decisive v ic to ry o f the b o u r geois re vo lu tio n and the d e fin itiv e establishm ent o f ca p ita list p ro p e rty relations (fo r example, the R estoration o f 1815 in France) so, experience has shown, a p o litic a l c o u n te r-re vo lu tio n can destroy the p o litic a l pow er o f the w o rkin g class a fte r the destruction of ca p ita lism w ith o u t q u a lita tiv e ly m o d ify in g the socialized p ro p e rty relations. Such a p o litic a l c o u n te r-re vo lu tio n occurred in the Soviet U nion under S talin. The social la ye r th a t dispossessed the Soviet p ro le ta ria t in the exercise o f p o litic a l pow er was the bureaucracy. T hat there exists a deep antagonism between th is bureaucracy and the pro le ta ria t is not a “ T ro ts k y ite ” in ve n tion. In his last years Len in had deep m isgivings about the increas ing pow er o f the bureaucracy and he was constantly w a rn in g about it and preparing fo r the coming struggle w ith it. In the fin a l co d icil to his testament', w hich was published fo r the firs t tim e in the S oviet U nion o n ly tw o years ago, Le n in proposed th a t several hundred w o rke rs should be L en in bro u g h t in to the C entral C om m it tee w h ile rem a in in g on the job. The m a jo rity of the C entral C om m ittee decided not to act on this advice. They com pletely m is understood o r underestim ated the danger o f the bureaucracy as a social fo rm ation. U n w ittin g ly they thereby fa c ilita te d S ta lin ’s de struction o f Soviet and p a rty dem ocracy and the establishm ent of his bureaucratic d ictatorship: W hen they fin a lly grasped the danger, i t was too late. F o r th is m istake the y paid w ith th e ir lives. L eft Opposition I t w ill rem ain the eternal m e rit of T ro tsky and the L e ft Opposi tio n to have co rre ctly understood the g ra v ity o f the danger fro m the tim e o f L e n in ’s death. They c o rre ctly defended a policy o f in d u stria liza tio n and the m ainte nance o f Soviet democracy. Suc cess in th is could have lim ite d the bureaucratic deform ation of state and p a rty. A lth o u g h they suffered defeat, th e ir struggle saved the honor o f Bolshevism and the program o f com m unism , m a kin g i t possible to tra n s m it these precious assets to a new generation. The cause o f the L e ft O pposition became the cause of the F o urth In te rn a tio n a l. I t is the cause of re v o lu tio n a ry M a rx is m today, the cause o f Leninism . K hrushchev and the ru lin g strata of the S oviet bureaucracy, i t is true, are try in g to tra n sfo rm S ta lin in to a scapegoat fo r the collective crim es com m itted by the bureaucracy and the leadership of the CPSU in the 1930s and late r. W hen the authors of the a rticle . “ On the Question o f S ta lin ” recall K hru sh ch e v’s declarations in 193738, when they re fe r o b liq u e ly to K h ru sh ch e v’s own ro le as a butcher o f U k ra in ia n C om m unists and in tellectuals d u rin g the Y ezovtchina, th ey do w e ll, be i t fo r obscure reasons o f th e ir own. T hey w rite , fo r instance: “ W hy does K hrushchev, w ho was in the leadership o f the p a rty and the state in S ta lin ’s period, and w ho active ly supported and fir m ly [ ! ] executed the p o licy o f sup pressing co unte r-revolutionists, repudiate e v e ryth in g done d u rin g th is period and s h ift the blame fo r a ll the errors on to S ta lin alone, w h ile altogether w h ite w ashing him self?” T his scores a good debating p o in t and at the same tim e serves the m ore serious purpose o f w a rn in g K hrushchev th a t i f the fig h t becomes rougher, th e Chinese, or people a llie d to them , m ig h t a t a certain p o in t begin disclosing specific crim es com m itted d u rin g the period o f the purges b y K h r u shchev and other associates o f his now on the P raesidium of the C entral Com m ittee o f the CPSU. I f th is approach is pursued, tw o possibilities are open. One is to w hitew ash S ta lin w h ich also w h ite washes K hrushchev and the w hole Soviet bureaucracy. The other is to in d ic t K hrushchev and the rest o f his colleagues fo r th e ir jo in t re sp o n sib ility in S ta lin ’s crimes. The Chinese leaders seem — fo r the tim e being — to have adopted the firs t course. T his leads away fro m the tru th , aw ay fro m L e n in ism, aw ay fro m the S oviet masses. As fo r us, we p re fe r the other course. U n-M arxist Theory The authors o f the a rticle under exam ination satisfy themselves w ith denouncing the com pletely u n -M a rx is t th eory of the “ p er sona lity c u lt,” w ith o u t atte m ptin g to o ffe r a M a rxist, dialectical m a te ria lis t explanation o f the con tra d ictio n s o f S oviet society. In deed, they even m a in ta in th a t these contradictions are essentially nonexistent and that a ll th a t is invo lve d is the “ in te rre la tio n sh ip of leaders, p a rty, class and masses.” T his is a ll the stranger in View o f the fa ct th a t Mao Tse-tung him self, as late as 1957, i.e., a fte r the H ungarian R evolution, in his Page Five day,, N ovem ber 4, 1963 speech e n title d “ On the C ontra dictions w ith in the People,” came close to a “ T ro ts k y is t” — th a t is, a M a rx is t — analysis of these contradictions. M ao’s vie w was q u ite d iffe re n t fro m K h rush ch e v’s ra m bling s on the “ personality c u lt,” w h ic h cannot be taken seriously b y any M a rx is t. (A c u lt th a t dom inated society com pletely, ye t had no roots w hatsoever in its in fra s tru c tu re ! ) M ao’s vie w was d iffe re n t, too, fro m th a t of the authors o f “ On the Question o f S ta lin ” w ith th e ir v u lg a r p la ti tudes about the “ leaders” and the “ masses.” In his w e ll-k n o w n speech Mao reduced the basic co ntra d ictio n “ w ith in the people,” in the period o f the d icta to rsh ip o f the pro le ta ria t, to the con tra diction between w o rke rs engaged in productio n and “ ad m inistra tors.” (W e p re fe r the te rm used b y M a rx and Lenin, “ bureaucrats.” ) F rom th is analysis i t is b u t a step to understanding the crim es o f the S ta lin is t era as re su ltin g fro m a tem porary defeat o f the w orke rs by the bureaucracy u n der specific conditions of isola tio n of the re vo lu tio n , backw a rd ness o f the cou ntry and la ck of understanding by the “ subjective fa c to r” (th e p a rty ) a fte r the death o f L e nin. Instead o f ta kin g th is step fo r w a rd in the d ire ctio n o f Leninism , the Chinese leaders seem today to be ta kin g a step backw ard to an absurd denial o f social con tra d ic tions “ w ith in the people” d u rin g the d ictatorship of the p ro le ta ria t, to an absurd denial o f the crimes o f S talin. The stream o f h isto ry is m oving in a d ire ctio n opposite to these new errors! Hungarian Revolution I t is in the lig h t o f this same con trad iction between the w o rke rs and peasants on one hand and the bureaucracy on the o ther th a t the w o rking-class uprisings in East B e rlin and East G erm any J u ly 1617, 1953, and the dem onstrations in Poland and re vo lu tio n in H u n g a ry in October 1956 m ust be view ed. The contradictio n between the social forces in these countries was rendered a ll the m ore v io le n t b y economic e xp lo ita tio n and na tio n a l oppression practiced in these countries under S talin. In th e ir fir s t a rticle o f re p ly to the “ Open L e tte r” o f the C entral C om m ittee o f the CPSU, the edi tors o f the People’s D a ily and Red Flag im p lic itly recognize th is fact, fo r the y state: “ B y m oving up troops in an attem pt to subdue the P olish comrades by arm ed force, i t [th e leadership o f the CPSU] com m itted the e rro r o f greatpow er chauvinism .” The authors also reveal (a fa c t w id e ly know n in C om m unist c ir cles) th a t the leaders o f the Chinese C om m unist p a rty s tro n g ly opposed K re m lin in te rve n tio n in P oland and thereby pro b a b ly saved the Polish w o rk in g class and G om ulka fro m a re p e titio n o f the H un g arian tragedy. A ll the m ore astonishing is th e ir prid e in h a v in g pressed fo r co u n te r-re vo lu tio n a ry in te rve n tio n against the H u n garian w orke rs: “ We insisted on the ta k in g o f a ll necessary meas ures to smash the c o u n te r-re v o lu tio n a ry re b ellion in H ungary and fir m ly opposed the abandonment o f socialist H u n g a ry.” The m ain social force in re b e l lio n in H u ngary was the w o rk in g class. A couple o f facts prove this to the h ilt. A fte r Soviet troops smashed the N agy governm ent, the w o rkers organized one of the longest and most solid general strikes in the h isto ry o f the in te r n a tio n a l w o rke rs’ movem ent. The fre e ly elected leadership advanced the fo llo w in g p u re ly socialist de mands: “ We state expressly th a t t he re vo lu tio n a ry w o rk in g class considers the factories and the land as property of the people . . . We ask fo r free elections, b u t o n ly those parties should be allow ed to p a rticipate in them who recognize and have alw ays recognized the socialist order.” The authors of “ On the Ques tio n of S ta lin ” did not, o f course, compose a pure and sim ple apol ogy fo r S talin, as some people have in c o rre c tly assumed. They note m any “ e rro rs” com m itted by S ta lin in m any fields. A m ong other things they censure S ta lin fo r “ also g iv in g some bad counsel in the in te rn a tio n a l C om m unist movem ent. These mistakes caused some [ ! ] losses to the Soviet U nion and the in te rn a tio n a l C om m unist m ovem ent.” W hen the authors tu rn to th e ir own co u n try and th e ir ow n Rev olu tio n, this heavy v e il o f discre- M a rx tio n and understatem ent is re placed b y a th in n e r c u rta in . We learn th a t “ in the late 20s, the 30s and the e a rly 40s, the Chinese M a rx is t-L e n in is ts represented by Comrades Mao Tse-tung and L iu Chao-shi resisted the influence of S ta lin ’s mistakes . . .” In other words, in Chinese a f fa irs, S ta lin was w ro n g fo r 20 years! A s lig h t erro r, o f course, especially i f you happen to know , as the a rtic le adm its fo r the firs t tim e — at least by im p lic a tio n — th a t the rig h t-w in g errors th a t led to the tra g ic defeat of the Chinese R evolution o f 1925-27 w ere d i re c tly inspired by S ta lin ’s “ bad counsel.” Instead o f repeating the tire d phrases about “ T rotskyites, Z in o vievites, B u k h a rin ite s and other bourgeois agents,” the leaders o f the Chinese C om m unist p a rty w o u ld do b etter to m ake an objec tiv e study o f the real positions held by L . D. T ro ts k y and the m ovem ent founded b y h im , both in the past and at present. Thus they w o u ld discover th a t T ro ts k y cor re c tly opposed both the “ rig h tis t” and “ le ftis t” e rrors o f S ta lin and the C om intern leadership up to 1932, even before Mao Tse-tung fe lt th a t som ething was w rong. S urely the leaders o f the Chinese C om m unist p a rty m ust know th a t the T ro tskyists everyw here in the w o rld have been the staunchest defenders o f the great Chinese R evolution and the great People’s R epublic o f C hina against the a t tacks o f N e h ru ’s ca p ita list regim e and its apologists. S urely they m ust know th a t these same T ro t skyists everyw here in the w o rld defend the Chinese C om m unist p a rty against the slanders o f the K hrushchevites w ho have sud denly discovered th a t i t is Mao Tse-tung and his comrades and n o t the A m erican im p e ria lists who are “ w arm ongers” and people desirous o f “ p ro vo kin g nuclear w o rld w a r.” A t a mom ent when the Chinese CP is under a con stant barrage o f slander o f the purest S ta lin is t type; at a mom ent when K hrushchev and his hench men are labeling the C hinese com rades “ s p litte rs ” and “ w reckers” because they dare introduce th e ir C om m unist lite ra tu re in to the So v ie t U nion, even p rin te d — w h a t blasphem y! — in the Russian la n guage, i t is scarcely a good exam ple of p ro le ta ria n m orals fo r the Chinese comrades to em ploy the same k in d of slanders against the Trotskyists. Please don’t do to others w h a t you don’t w a n t done to you, comrades! W hen Izvestia devotes a h a lf page to p ro vin g th a t the F o u rth In te rn a tio n a l favors the side o f the Chinese CP on some im p o rta n t points in the dispute w ith Moscow and hence a “ bloc” exists between P eking and the T rotskyists, shouldn’t i t prove em barrassing to the leaders o f the Chinese CP to claim th a t these supporters are “ bourgeois agents?” B u t S ta lin ’s “ bad counsel” was n ot lim ite d to Chinese a ffa irs. L e t us recall a fe w examples. Isn ’t it w e ll know n th a t S ta lin opposed the Y ugoslav C om m unist p a rty ’s fig h tin g fo r pow er fro m 1943 on, as in 1946 he opposed Mao Tsetu n g ’s tu rn in g to w a rd the struggle fo r power? Isn ’t it w e ll know n th a t he advocated the same ca p itu la tio n is t lin e fo r Vietnam ? H ow do the Chinese leaders judge the fa c t th a t every re v o lu tio n th a t achieved a d icta to rsh ip o f the p ro le ta ria t by its own independent force in S ta lin ’s tim e had to do so against his opposition? Some o f S ta lin ’s “ e rro rs ” hap p ily did not prevent fin a l v ic to ry . B u t w h a t about the more disas trous “ erro rs” th a t continue to bear consequences to this v e ry day? Do the Chinese leaders believe today th a t S ta lin was rig h t in the c rim in a l lin e he advocated in G erm any fro m 1929 to 1933, according to w h ich not fascism b u t the socialdemocracy was the m ain enemy and the m ain target to be attacked b y the German C om m unist party? Do they approve o f the classcollaborationist, rig h t-w in g , op p o rtu n is t lin e applied by S ta lin in Spain in 1936-39 w h ich strangled the Spanish social re v o lu tio n and thereby g re a tly fa c ilita te d Franco’s m ilita r y victo ry? A n d w h a t about p a rtic ip a tin g in and upholding c a p ita lis t governm ents, a id in g in reconstructing the bourgeois arm y and the bourgeois state apparatus in France and Ita ly a fte r the sec ond w o rld w a r, a course carried out b y the C om m unist parties u n der d ire ct in stru ctio n s fro m S ta lin w h ic h ended up by destroying h ig h ly favorable conditions fo r the v ic to ry o f the w o rk in g class in W estern Europe? The balance sheet o f these “ e r ro rs ” is indeed staggering. Re peated over such a long period, in so m any countries, can they s till be called ju s t “ e rro rs” ? F o r a M a rx is t, w o u ld n ’t i t be m ore cor re ct to ca ll i t a fu n d a m e n ta lly w ro n g policy? A n d in th a t case, isn’t i t necessary to probe fo r the social roots of S ta lin is t op p o rtu n ism, ju s t as L e n in probed fo r the social roots of re fo rm is t op p o rtu n ism? Feeble Control I t is true, as the authors o f the a rtic le cla im in passing, th a t the leaders of the Chinese CP suc ceeded in correcting o r pre ve n tin g some o f these “ erro rs” and essen tia lly ke p t th e ir ow n counsel. They were able to do so and fin a lly lead the Chinese R evolution to v ic to ry because o f the feebleness o f C om intern control due to th e ir re la tiv e geographical isolation. B u t they kn o w th a t S ta lin intervened d ire c tly in the leadership o f the Chinese CP several tim es to tr y to p u t people in charge w hom he considered s u ffic ie n tly subservient to him self. I t is scarcely cause fo r w onder then th a t in most C om m unist p a r ties, ruthless in te rv e n tio n b y the S ta lin is t in te rn a tio n a l apparatus succeeded in e lim in a tin g fro m leadership genuine re v o lu tio n a ry figures, rooted in the la b o r move ments of th e ir own countries. The K re m lin replaced these re v o lu tionists by servile, spineless execu tors of S ta lin ’s orders, no m a tte r how c o n tra d icto ry o r how they subordinated the interests o f the in te rn a tio n a l re v o lu tio n a ry m ove m ent to the d ip lo m a tic maneuvers and passing needs of Soviet fo r eign policy. Ever since the T ito crisis of 1948, and more especially since S ta lin ’s death in 1953, the w o rld crisis o f S talinism has continued to deepen. In o rder to save w h a t they rig h tly consider to be the es sence o f th e ir ru le — economic p rivilege s and a m onopoly of po litics — the S oviet bureaucrats have been forced to make one con cession a fte r another to the Soviet masses as they press fo r restora tio n o f Soviet democracy. The abandonm ent o f the S ta lin c u lt in 1956 at the T w e n tie th Congress of the CPSU was the most im p o r ta n t o f these concessions, the one th a t created the most contradic tions w ith in the in te rn a tio n a l S ta lin is t apparatus itself. Today no objective basis w h a t ever exists, eith e r in the Soviet U nion or in the East European w o rke rs’ states, fo r a re tu rn to th a t cu lt. The S oviet masses are not m uch interested in B yzantine spec u la tio n about w h a t S ta lin said or re a lly m eant by this o r th a t state m ent about the p a rty and its cadres. B u t they are e xtre m ely in terested in preventing any re tu rn to the system under w h ich w o rk ers could be condemned to hard la b o r fo r being as little as 20 m in utes late to the job. They are e x tre m e ly interested in preventing a re tu rn to a system u nder w h ich th e ir standard o f liv in g was ru th lessly sacrificed in the name o f an in d u s tria l “ gia ntism ” in w hich h e artbreaking waste occurred due to bureaucratic mismanagement. They are ve ry interested in over com ing the inhum an housing shortage th a t began in S ta lin ’s tim e. T hey are m ore and m ore in terested in p a rtic ip a tin g d ire c tly in control and management o f the economy and state — rights, the exercise of w hich was u tte rly de stroyed under S talin. W hen th ey hear the Chinese leaders say, “ Long liv e L e n in ism !” th e y th in k o f L e n in ’s teachings on socialist democracy, on the highest fu n ctions being exercised b y sim - K hrushchev pl e w orkers, on the d icta torship o f the p ro le ta ria t being the fir s t fo rm o f the state destined to w ith e r aw ay fro m the m om ent o f its creation. On a ll these great themes o f L e n in ’s w o rk State and R evolu tio n , the Chinese leaders are, how ever, strangely silent. Faced w ith th is deepening mood o f the masses, no sector o f the Soviet bureaucracy th a t keeps in touch w ith re a lity dares to p la y w ith the “ defense o f S ta lin ,” fo r this w o uld be the most certain w a y of c u ttin g themselves fro m the ra n k and file o f the p a rty and the masses o f w orkers and pea sants, and most lik e ly p re c ip ita tin g an im m ediate v io le n t p o litic a l crisis in the country. F o r the same reason, any p o licy geared to " re h a b ilita te S ta lin ” bars a “ bloc” w ith any p a rt of the Soviet bu reaucracy. I t is a sterile attem pt to make an alliance w ith the shade hanging over the bureaucracy in opposition to a ll the real social forces o f the Soviet U nion, in c lu d in g the b u lk o f the bureaucracy itse lf. To seek such an “ alliance” can lead to no thin g b u t isolation and u tte r fa ilu re . In the same w ay, no objective basis exists today fo r the creation of an in te rn a tio n a l fa ctio n in the w o rld C om m unist m ovem ent th a t w o uld prove sub se rvien t to the Chinese state or any other state. The Yugoslavs found th is o u t at some cost to themselves. On the other hand, i t is p e r fe c tly tru e th a t ever since the T w e n tie th Congress, a du a l process has been a ffe ctin g the leadership o f the w o rld C om m unist m ove m ent. P a ra lle l to the so-called “ deS ta lin iza tio n ” process a m ore and m ore pronounced rig h t-w in g o rie n ta tio n has appeared among the leaderships o f nearly a ll the Com m u n ist parties in the ca p ita list countries, im p e ria lis t and colonial alike. Because they rig h tly c ritic iz e the neo - re fo rm ist, neo - B ernsteinian theory and practice o f a “ peace fu l, p a rlia m e n ta ria n road to so cialism through gradual s tru c tu ra l re fo rm s” ; because they condemn the c rim in a l p olicy o f try in g to convince the A m e rican w orke rs and Negroes th a t they should sup p o rt the D em ocratic P a rty, w h ich also happens to be the p a rty o f the m ost rab id J im C row S outh ern Bourbons; because th ey v io le n tly and correctly condemn the sham eful ca p itu la tio n o f the Dange leadership before the In d ia n b o u r geoisie; because they advocate th a t the L a tin -A m e ric a n masses should fo llo w the road blazed by the Cuban revo lu tio n ists; in b rie f be cause they in general advocate in most c a p ita list countries a m ore le ftis t p olicy — a lb e it often n o t a com pletely correct re v o lu tio n a ry M a rx is t one — and defend the ABCs o f L e n in ’s teachings on the state and the dicta to rsh ip o f the p ro le ta ria t, the Chinese Com m u nists have already w on m uch sym p a th y among the ra n k and file o f the w o rld C om m unist m ovem ent and they can w in more. Poor Policy B u t the ra n k and file o f these parties are w e ll aw are th a t i t is u tte rly impossible to advance the cause o f socialism b y “ defending S ta lin .” T hey can o n ly feel em barrassm ent over anyone w ho trie s it. To tr y to “ re h a b ilita te S ta lin ” w ill ne ith e r help them w in Com m unist m ilita n ts to the Chinese position n o r fa c ilita te the task o f w in n in g stronger positions among the masses o f th e ir respective countries. T his lin e also cuts them o ff fro m the genuine le ft-w in g Communists in the w o rke rs’ states, w ho are against K hrushchev, not because he has carried o u t “ deS ta lin iza tio n ” b u t because he doesn’t go fa r enough w ith it! Since the elements m ost sympa th e tic to the Chinese CP are gen e ra lly the m ost independentm inded in a ll these C om m unist parties, the strange “ cam paign” advocating a “ re tu rn to S ta lin ” in stead o f a “ re tu rn to L e n in ” in sults th e ir intelligence, clashes w ith th e ir class consciousness and p ro le ta ria n instincts and arouses an opposition w h ic h they w ill most c e rta in ly express. The bureaucratic m aneuver o f speaking up fo r S ta lin thus only leads in to an impasse. In C hina itself, the Com m unists w h o come to understand th is w ill increase in num ber fro m m onth to m onth. In the case o f China, as has already been shown in the case o f the Soviet U nion, the e ffo rt to b u ild an in te rn a tio n a l factio n w ill have im p o rta n t consequences through the in tro d u c tio n o f strong pres sures and contradictions w ith in the m ovem ent of those w ho sta rt it. I t is ve ry im p o rta n t to have a correct program ! F or Chinese C om m unists the choice today is ve ry clear: e ith e r backw ard to S ta lin , to complete isolatio n fro m the masses in the ‘‘so cialist" camp and g ro w ing iso la tio n fro m the advanced m ilita n ts and le ft Communists o f the capi ta lis t countries; or fo rw a rd to L e n in , to f u ll restoration o f Le n in ism in correspondence w ith the needs and aspirations o f the great m a jo rity o f Com m unists in the w o rke rs’ states as w e ll as the cap ita lis t states and in correspon dence w ith the objective needs of the w o rld socialist re v o lu tio n to day. Page S ix T H E M IL IT A N T M onday, N ovem ber 4, 1963 REPORT FROM SPANISH UNDERGROUND Peruvian Peasant Leader Mine Strikers Tortured by Franco’s Cops In Aid Appeal from Prison [T h e re p o rt th a t follo w s was obtained fro m the Spanish a n ti fascist underground by W orld O u t look. The shocking facts i t p re sents squarely repudiate the re cent ly in g claim o f the Franco ty ra n n y th a t police b ru ta lity was n o t practiced against coal mine strike rs in A sturias, northern Spain. The regim e’s denial of b ru ta lity came in response to a protest m anifesto b y 102 Spanish intellectuals. A co u rt in q u iry has now been launched w ith an eye to charging signers o f the m anifesto w ith spreading “ ten dentious” news.] * * * The p rin c ip a l d ire cto r o f the repression is a captain o f the C iv il G uard, Fernando Caro, 28, son o f an a rm y colonel and a na tiv e o f M e lilla [M oro cco ], w ho u n til recently was a captain of the C iv il G uard in Málaga. I t was be cause o f his ta le n t as a to rtu re r th a t he was tran sferred to A s tu rias. One of his assistants, w e llkn o w n fo r his cru e lty, is C orporal Pérez, a G alician. On Sept. 3 at fo u r o’clock in the afternoon, a m iner, Rafael G on zalez, 36, died at police headquar ters in Sama de Langreo fo llo w in g to rtu re . T he same day a t the same place another m iner, S ilv in o Zapico, 34, was castrated (presum ably by the system in general use o f b u rn in g the h a ir and skin in the g enital a rea ). He is in a hospital in grave condition. T his m in e r was ac cused o f being a “ C om m unist.” H is w ife , s im ila rly accused, was subm itted to h a ving her head shaved. S till another m in er, whose name we have not ye t learned, is also in the hospital in grave condition fro m b u m s in the g e n ita l area. Vicente Baragaña, w ho lives in th e Lada, a q u a rte r o f Langreo, was reduced to sexual im potency b y b u rn in g o f the testicles d u rin g a to rtu re session. A lfon so X ., a fo rm e r w a tch m an at the Fondón m ine, re tire d because o f silicosis, w ho is at p re sent a cashier in an insurance company, P revisora B ilb a in o , was savagely beaten d u rin g the strikes la st year. T h is year a fte r his a r rest he was tied up and then beaten b y C orporal Pérez in the presence o f his w ife. The w ife was incapable o f en d u rin g the sight. She attacked the corporal. L e a vin g the unconscious hus band, the corporal beat the woman b ru ta lly . She is at present in p ris on in Oviedo, h e r head shaved lik e m any other w ives o f miners. L a te r in the day, her b a d ly beaten husband was released to a m an named Senén. A fte r ta kin g the v ic tim home, Senén, a fe llo w w o rke r, called a doctor. The to r ture d body o f the w o rk e r was in such shape th a t the doctor said he scarcely kne w w here to begin. A n to n io Zapico o f Lada was b ru ta lly m anhandled. H is cheek bone was broken and his m outh W O R LD Franco to m open d u rin g to rtu re . He is in the hospital. Jerónim o Fernández Terente, m a rrie d and fa th e r o f a son, and Jesús Ramo Teva, together w ith ten other m iners are now in the Carabanchel prison at M a d rid a fte r having been b ru ta lly m is treated. Everardo Castra, m a rrie d and the fa th e r o f three boys, is in La Cadellada, a p ro v in c ia l m ental hospital, fo llo w in g the ferocious to rtu re in flic te d on him . He had clim bed up the rainspouts o f the D u ro Felguera Company to p a in t the slogan, “ The people w ill avenge themselves. Franco, m u r derer.” Surprised by the C iv il Guard w h ile he was doing this, he was ordered to c lim b dow n. The m in e r had the coolness to re p ly, “ W a it u n til I fin is h .” He was te rrib ly beaten. T in a M artinez, w ho live s in the q u a rte r of L a Jocara in Sama de Langreo, was to rtu re d and h e r head shaved. H er husband has been in prison since the strikes last year. Juan A lb e rd i o f Lada was a r rested along w ith another m in e r nicknam ed “ C hocolatina.” To amuse h im s e lf C aptain Fernando Caro ordered them to fig h t each other. Since the fig h t, n a tu ra lly , was not carried on in earnest, the to rtu re rs o f the C iv il G uard took over and com pleted the beating w h ich the tw o m iners had sought to evade. L a te r th e y were bro u g h t before C aptain Caro w ho iro n ic a l ly reproached them , “ B u t w h a t beasts you are to beat each other lik e th is !” A woman, whose name has not O UTLO O K A Labor Press Service News and political analysis of special interest to militant unionists, socialists, colonial revolutionists, opponents of nuclear war and supporters of civil rights and the Negro struggle for freedom. Features magazine-length articles on topics of prime world interest such as the current Peking-Moscow conflict, the shift in relations between the USA and USSR, underground struggles in Spain, the Portuguese colonies, Latin America, etc. Students of world affairs will find it of great assistance in working out the deeper meaning of events. Compiled weekly from the vantage point of Paris. For 26 issues send $7.50 to: PIERRE FRANK 21 RUE D’ABOUKIR, PARIS 2, FRANCE yet been learned, trie d to escape the i l l tre a tm e n t they were p re p a rin g to in flic t on her at police headquarters in Sama de Langreo, by revealing th a t she was preg nant. Captain Fernando Caro punched her w ith a ll his force in the stomach, shouting, “ One Com m u n ist less!” I t should be added th a t this captain wears sport clothes to “ w o rk ” m ore co m fo rta b ly d u rin g his “ interrogations.” O u t of the m iners w ho have been arrested, the whereabouts o f m ore than fiv e hundred is u n know n. Some s ix ty m iners o f H u l lera Española in the A lle r basin asked fo r death in o rder to end the to rtu re and bad treatm ent. On Sept. 10 tw e n ty m iners were arrested at the Camocha m ine in G ijó n . T hey w ere b ro u g h t to po lice headquarters w here they were beaten u n til three of them lost consciousness. M a ria del Rosario G arcia, 55, was arrested fo r lodging a m iner, her b ro th e r-in -la w . On being asked w here she was being taken, they replied, “ F irs t to police head quarters and then to ja il.” I f companies n o t on s trik e h ire a s trik e r, they are punished by a fir s t fin e o f 1,000 pesetas, a sec ond o f 6,000. On the th ird offense the place is padlocked. C aptain Fernando Caro u tilize s an “ o rig in a l” system to select his victim s. He calls in the watchm en o f a m ine and orders each one to b rin g in fiv e men to go to w o rk. Since they generally show up the n e xt day w ith o u t any recruits, the captain asks them w hom they w e n t to see. The w atchm en re p o rt the names of the m iners w ho d id not respond and C aptain Caro orders these men to be b ro u g h t in im m e d ia te ly and then begins the session of to rtu re . On S aturday m orning, Sept. 4, some 50 per cent o f the m iners w e n t dow n in to the Camocha m ine. Once inside the w o rkin g s they decided th a t ra th e r than come out and expose themselves to the police repression they w o u ld stay in the mine, b u t w ith o u t w o rk in g . A lth o u g h th e y had made no p re parations fo r th is tactic, m ost of the m iners agreed to accept the collective decision. They stayed in a ll day and n ig h t. The dem onstration d id not end u n til Sun day m orning. The police reaction to this move is not yet know n. P E A S A N T L E A D E R S . Hugo Blanco, center, before his arrest, w ith fe llo w fighters against rapacious P e ru v ia n land barons. [T he fo llo w in g le tte r was w r it ten by Hugo Blanco, m ain peasant leader in the Convención v a lle y of Peru, fro m his cell in the M ariscal G am arra barracks at A requipa. In his le tte r H ugo B lanco appeals fo r c o n trib utio ns to help his legal de fense. Due to com m unication d if ficu ltie s, we are unable to specify an address to w h ich funds can be sent. We hope to provide this in an e a rly issue.] To the People o f Peru: T his tr ia l is not against me per sonally b u t against the P eruvian re volution . The reaction claims th a t i t w ill place the g u ilty ones in the dock. We w ill not adm it this. In the dock m ust be placed the oligarchy. I t is precisely because the ju d g m ent w ill not be levelled against me personally, th a t the P eruvian people and not the ca m a rilla of o fficers and spokesmen in the service of the monsters m ust be the judge. A n d before th is judge we m ust make o ur exposure of the betrayals of our country, the m urders, robberies, thefts and v iolations com m itted by the entire oligarchy, especially the landlords in a ll corners of the country. T his is the most favorable tim e to do this. The P eruvian people are fo llo w in g the tria l, ready to W o r ld Dominican Student Rallies Assail New M ilitary Junta The m ilita ry ju n ta in Santo Domingo, w h ic h o ve rth re w legal ly-elected P resident Juan Bosch on Sept. 25, has n o t been able to stabilize its ru le or fin d a base of p o p u la r support. Sensing this weakness, U.S. diplom acy — w h ic h sees in the m ilita r y a frie n d — has been q u ie tly u r ging the brass hats to m ake some con cessions in the w a y o f “ democ ra tic ” w indow -dressing to tr y to appease the populace. The mass o f D om inican w o rk ers, peasants, students and p ro fessional people, w ho suffered thro u g h 30 years o f p o ve rty and dictatorship under T ru jillo , have no stomach fo r a governm ent of the same generals w ho supported T ru jillo . F ro m the firs t, young people have led dem onstrations against the m ilita r y usurpers, d ra w in g support fro m the c ity w orkers, peasant unions, and those p o litic a l parties w h ic h opposed the takeover. A s ig n ific a n t dem onstration was held Oct. 20 in a w o rk e r’s dis tr ic t o f Santo Dom ingo led by students and w o rke rs o f the p ro Castro 14th o f June M ovem ent. On Oct. 28, as m any as 8,000 D om inicans a tt e n d e d another m eeting to denoun ce the seizure listen and to judge. W hatever we are able to do in th is sense w ill be in su fficie n t. The unions, the federations o f peasants, o f w o rk ers, students, employees, etc., m ust jo in to the utm ost in th is task. I t is m y fate to be the one to sit in the p risoner’s dock. I t w ill be converted in to a trib u n e o f the re vo lu tio n to accuse the accusers. T ha t is w h y I m ust have a record of the crim es of the landlords and o f the w hole o ligarchy to th ro w i t in to the faces o f the accusers w ho symbolize the reaction. I ask the comrades to send me th is record. U n fo rtu n a te ly the tr ia l room is not large enough to hold ten m il lio n people — w h ich means th a t the real judges w ill n o t be able to be present. T he y are in the streets o f the cities and towns, in the fields . . . I f we w a n t our ac cusation to reach them, now th a t h isto ry has given us the pos s ib ility , i t is necessary to prepare m illio n s o f leaflets, o f pam phlets, perhaps a book. U n fo rtu n a te ly money is re qu ire d fo r this and I do not have any. I have never asked fo r fin a n c ia l assistance, b u t now I do i t not fo r m yself b u t fo r the denunciation, fo r the accusa tion. Land or death! We w ill w in ! H ugo Blanco E v e n ts o f power. U .S .-trained police broke up an attem pted march afterw ards. Besides the m ounting w ave of dem onstrations, the regim e’s in s ta b ility showed w hen the tw o parties th a t had supported Bosch rejected the compromise offered by the m ilita r y to give th e ir re p resentatives some posts in the gov ernm ent. A good exam ple o f the s p irit of p opular resistance was the a n ti governm ent r a lly held Oct. 13 at Santo Dom ingo U n iv e rs ity . The m eeting was described b y the D om inican paper, L is tín D iario , as “ a noisy dem onstration” in w h ich “ hundreds o f u n iv e rs ity students proclaim ed th a t they w o u ld fig h t to the end against the present governm ent.” The m eeting was punctuated by cries o f “ D own w ith the governm ent,” “ Assas sins,” and the Cuban slogan, “ C o u n try or death: we w ill w in !” The newspaper re p o rt regretted th a t the large gathering was led by tw o le ft-w in g student groups, Fragua and FURR, w ith no “ m od erates” represented. The speakers made such state ments as these: “ The u n iv e rs ity youth, conscious o f th e ir h isto rica l d uty, m arch in the vanguard against the d ic ta to r ships w h ich day a fte r day are crushing L a tin A m erica.” “ T his governm ent has p re scribed our methods o f struggle to us. I t has taken aw ay our rig h ts; i t obliges us to fig h t w ith arm s.” “ The governm ent has decreed a state o f siege, b u t we w ill show th a t we have s u ffic ie n t strength to fig h t the siege o f th is state.” (The state o f siege was lifte d Oct. 24, in an e ffo rt to w in fa vo r.) “ Legal means have been closed to us. There rem ains o n ly one w ay: to take arms in our hands, everyone, w ith o u t distin ctio n, women as w e ll as men.” Nuclear Reactor for Diem W h ile the K ennedy A d m in is tra tio n made noises about c u ttin g aid to the B u d d h is t-k illin g ty ra n n y of the D iem fa m ily , P resident K e n nedy sent a message o f congrat ulations to D iem on the n in th an n ive rsa ry o f his ru le and A m bas sador H e n ry Cabot Lodge accom panied d icta to r-p re sid e n t D iem to the dedication o f South V ie tn a m ’s firs t nuclear reactor. A lso present at the dedication was a represen ta tiv e o f the A to m ic E nergy Com mission. The reactor was b u ilt at a cost o f $350,000 b y General D ynam ics C orporation. W ill Mme. N hu have th is new “ to y ” at her disposal, so she can “ clap her hands,” im a g in in g k in g sized “ barbecues” ? T H E M IL IT A N T M onday, N ovem ber 4, 1963 Page Seven L e tte rs F ro m O u r R e a d e rs [ This colum n is an open jo ru m fo r a ll view points on subjects of general interest to our readers. Please keep yo u r letters under 400 words. W rite rs ’ in itia ls w ill be used, names being w ith h e ld unless a u thorization is given fo r use.] G od Raises W heat? Lakeside, C alif. Today (Oct. 18) A rm y Coach P aul D ietsel was H ugh Downes’ guest on the “ Today Show.” M r. D ietsel said, “ The U.S. can raise w heat because God is on our side.” H ow does Coach D ietsel ac count fo r the production o f w heat in 1959? USSR, 69,100,000 m e tric tons — U SA, 30,704,000 m e tric tons. A n d b arle y in 1959? China, 19,'720,000 m e tric tons — USA, 9,148,000 m e tric tons. ( In fo rm a tio n Please Alm anace fo r 1962, page 594). L ife , Sept. 13, 1963, page 56, reads: “ Since 1953 fa rm o u tp u t in the USSR has gone up a solid 60 per cent . . . Nobody is re a lly going h u n g ry . . . The a g ric u ltu ra l system is tu rn in g out enough food to give everyone an adequate, i f not abundant o r va rie d d ie t . . . 1963 has been sh ockingly lo w .” A n d he gave several basic rea sons: “ Savage c lim a tic conditions — extremes of heat, cold, drought.” The U SA too is h a vin g extrem e droughts at the present tim e. D ro u g h t is a disaster and disasters happen to every nation on earth, w h e th e r i t be earthquake, fir e or flo o d o r hurricane. C h ristia n D ietsel should h u m b ly p ra y fo r greater wisdom . Leda Ferguson Facts on Vietnam “ B U F F A L O — P olice te rro r once again h it the Negro com m u n ity in th is c ity e a rly in the m o rn in g o f Oct. 10. T his tim e it to ok the fo rm of an u n m e rc ifu l beating o f tw o young w orkers, N orm an and James D aniels, b y six clu b -h a p p y policem en . . . a beat in g w h ic h a p pa re ntly continued in tw o police vehicles en route to the ja il. B oth men w ere hospitalized w ith severe in ju rie s. “ A fte r reading the distorted ac count in the B ig Business press . . . th is re p o rte r w e n t to the home o f N orm an Daniels, one o f victim s. “ Y ou’re the fir s t re p o rte r th a t’s been here,” M rs. D aniels to ld me... “ ‘The p u b lic has got to do som ething about police b ru ta lity ,’ M rs. Daniels said. ‘W e’re ta u g h t democracy, b u t we get ju s t the opposite in practice. We pay taxes to support a police departm ent and instead o f p ro te ctin g us they m ake i t bad fo r us to w a lk the streets.’ “ ‘T hat cor n er (w here the men w ere beaten) is a b ig intersec tio n . . . I t ’s in the Negro d is tric t. W here else have colored people got to go? R e strictive covenants keep them fro m liv in g anyw here else in the city. The w hites should be made to realize th a t!’ ” — Nov. 2, 1953. 20 YEARS AGO “ Roosevelt, in his headlong d rive to w a rd reaction, has e n lis t ed m ore and m ore b ig business men as his d ire ct aides . . . “ R ecently Roosevelt dumped S um m er Welles, U nder-S ecretary o f State, and replaced h im w ith E R. S tettinius, ex-ch airm a n of U.S. Steel, a M organ m illio n a ire . The President appointed th e r a il road and m in in g magnate, W. A . H a rrim a n , as ambassador to the S oviet U nion . . . “ Nelson R ockefeller, C oordina to r of L a tin -A m e ric a n A ffa irs , has become in creasingly p ro m in e n t in a d m in istra tio n circles. Leo C ro w ley, W isconsin banker and u t il itie s president, is given W allace’s powers as czar of a ll fore ig n eco nom ic dealings. Ernest Fisher, ex-research d ire cto r of the A m e r ican Bankers Association, is p u t in charge o f ‘fu tu re economic operations’ in the L o w Countries. Chester Bowles, a dvertisin g t y coon w ho serviced G eneral Foods Corp., is made head o f the OPA... “ In 1932 Roosevelt prom ised ‘to d riv e the m oney-changers out of the tem ple’ at W ashington. Today the finance capitalists dom inate his ad m in istra tio n . U nder cover o f the w a r, W a ll S treet has taken personal charge o f the ke y gov e rnm ent agencies in o rder to tig h te n th e ir stranglehold on the n a tio n a l economy and to super vise the a d m in istra tio n ’s plans to subjugate the w o rld .” — Nov. 6, 1943. B ro n x, N.Y. A R euter’s a rticle in the New Y o rk Post the other day said th a t the V ie t Cong reported 600 A m e r icans a n n ihila te d o r captured in 1963 alone. The A m erican p u b lic has o n ly been in fo rm e d o f about 100 A m erican deaths fo r the en tire w a r. Captures are never m en tioned. This gives us food fo r thought. H o w m uch aren’ t we being told? H .L. Plan DuBois Memorial Cam bridge, Mass. The recent death o f D r. W.E.B. D uBois on the v e ry eve o f the h isto ric M a rch on W ashington, represents a grave loss to the w o rld -w id e struggle fo r freedom and justice. Y e t here in New Eng land, w here he was born and edu cated, there is danger th a t D r. D u Bois’ life and w orks m ay pass re la tiv e ly unnoticed. I t seems most appropriate th a t H a rv a rd U n iv e r sity, w h ich granted h im three de grees and published his w o rk as V olum e One o f the H a rv a rd H is to ric a l Studies, should be the loca tion of a m e m o ria l m eeting, as sem bling notables fro m around the w o rld , u n iv e rs ity faculties, stu dents, and interested people fro m the su rro u n din g com m unities to pay trib u te to th is great man. W ith such a program in m ind, w e o f the H a rv a rd -R a d c liffe So c ia lis t Club, an independent o r ganization, have reserved H a rv ard ’s fam ed Sanders T heater fo r the evening o f Nov. 20. In v ite d to p a rtic ip a te are S h irle y Graham , w id o w o f D r. D uB ois; A le x Q u a ison-Sackey, Ghanaian Representa tiv e to the U n ite d N ations; Drs. John Hope F ra n k lin and H e rb e rt A p th e ke r, both leading scholars in the fie ld o f Negro h is to ry ; Roy W ilk in s o f the N A A C P ; James F a rm e r o f CORE; John L e w is of SNCC; Langston Hughes, James B a ld w in , B ayard R ustin and others. There w ill be extensive p u b lic ity and press coverage, in clu d in g perhaps a telecast b y the local educational television o u t let. The o n ly obstacle at the m o ment, as is so fre q u e n tly the case, is money. The cost o f plane fares and lodgings fo r the speakers, the cost o f p u b lic ity and p rin tin g p ro grams are c le a rly beyond our lim ite d means. We are tu rn in g to people such as y o u r readers, con fid e n t th a t the im p o rt o f th is meeting w ill b rin g generous re sults. Please m ake checks payable to the H a rv a rd D uBois M em orial. Henry S. Kahn, President, H a rv a rd -R a d c liffe Socialist Club, Adam s House, B ox F-2, H a rv a rd U n iv e rs ity , Cam bridge 38, Mass. Kennedy and Vietnam F o rt Bragg, C a lif. The K ennedy A d m in is tra tio n ’s po licy of using A m erican ta x money and our arm ed forces to “ p rop u p ” the C atholic-dom inated D iem d icta to rsh ip in V ie tn a m is m aking m any enemies fo r our country, both at home and abroad. I t is in cre d ib le that, o f a ll the peo ple in V ietnam , the D iem fa m ily should be considered the o n ly peo ple capable o f m anaging the po litic a l a ffa irs o f th a t country. The V ie tn a m fiasco should be taken out o f the ju ris d ic tio n of President K ennedy and placed in the hands of a com m ittee o f Con gress where the people w o u ld have some voice in it. President Kennedy is u n der too m uch pres sure fro m his religious superiors to fa v o r the regim e th a t is d ic ta t ed b y th e ir fe llo w C atholic. This places our president in an un te n able position. He is to rn between a desire to serve the best interests o f his c o u n try and a fe a r of p u n ishm ent b y his re lig io u s superiors i f he does n o t support the Diem dictatorship. A s the situ a tio n now stands we are becoming the m ost hated n a tion in the w o rld as seen b y a n tiA m erican dem onstrations in m any parts o f the w o rld . T h is fla g ra n t d isc rim in a tio n in fa v o r o f the Roman C atholic D iem fa m ily is causing m any sincere people to w onder w ho is d ic ta tin g the V ie t nam policy o f our governm ent. M illio n s of d ollars of A m erican ta x money is handed over to a se c re t G estapo-like police system th a t is n o t req u ire d to give any accounting o f how th is money is spent. Is i t used to check the spread of Com m unism in V ie t nam or is i t used to prom ote re ligious persecution o f the B u d d h is t people there? IT IS T IM E TH E A M E R IC A N P E O P L E WERE F IN D IN G OUT. Jack Odom New Definition o f Liberal D e tro it, M ich. I came across an interesting d e fin itio n o f “ lib e ra l” in a sm all newspaper called C om m unity Vues. T his paper is the voice o f a num ber o f in n e r c ity block clubs. In the Oct. 12 issue, D r. J.H. B ruce w ro te an a rticle blasting D e tro it’s Common C ouncil fo r de fe a tin g an open occupancy o rd i nance. The ordinance was qu ite a w eak one and w ould not have changed m uch in housing d iscrim in a tio n b u t i t was a test fo r a ll the c ity o fficia ls — a test they flu n k e d m iserably. The ordinance was introduced b y W illia m P a trick, the o n ly Ne gro m em ber o f the C ouncil, and was supported b y Councilm an R avitz. On Oct. 9, the C ouncil defeated the ordinance seven to tw o. One o f the seven was P h illip Van A n tw e rp w ho ran against a Negro in the last election and w ho was supported by some o f the c ity ’s N egro leaders because he was supposed to be a great lib eral. He was also supported by the la b o r o ffic ia ls and ended up get tin g about 25 per cent o f the Ne gro vote. H ere’s w h a t D r. B ruce w rote: “ Van A n tw e rp calls him se lf a lib eral. Negroes should kn o w exa ctly w h a t a p o litic a l lib e ra l is. A po litic a l lib e ra l is one w ho straddles a ll m oral re lig iou s and co n tro ve rsia issues hoping to gain the plaudits o f everyone a fte r the issue is settled — one w ho smiles in yo u r face p riv a te ly , b u t w h o w ill disem bow el you before yo u r enemy. Van A n tw e rp is alleged to have said, ‘You can’t legalize morals. Y ou have to im prove peo ple and b rin g them up to a certain level before th ey can be accepted.’ “ This statem ent should i ns u lt every Negro throughout the w o rld ! C e rta in ly every N egro in D e tro it. W ha t he re a lly said was th a t N e groes are on a low er level m o ra lly, educationally, c u ltu ra lly and eco n o m ica lly than w h ite people . . .” D r. B ruce also exposed another great “ lib e ra l” w ho w on o ffic e through the votes o f Negroes. “ M ayor Cavanagh’s ‘jo h n ny-co m e la te ly ’ endorsement o f the P a tric k R a vitz proposed ordinance was ludicrous . . . O n ly a fte r the pub lic hearing, and a fte r being con vinced o f the sentim ent and con sensus o f religious, civic, business and union leadership in D e tro it, in clu d in g the press and T V , d id M a yo r Cavanagh "venture to ex press his approval o f the o rd in ance. “ He then b la ta n tly announced the necessity fo r D e tro it going on record in th is m a tte r as a m a t te r o f ‘p rin c ip le and p o licy.’ W h y , in heaven’s name, d id he n o t lead ou t on the issue as E xecutive lead er in D etroit? No, he in te n tio n a lly w a ited u n til he saw the v ic to ry was im m in e n t; then he grabbed the fla g and attem pted to w ave i t in fro n t of the m arch fo r e q u a lity and progress.” Evelyn Sell It Was Reported in the Press The Press a t Work — R eporting Eisenhow er’s disclosure th a t he had opposed the atom ic bom bing o f Japan, the Oct. 25 New Y o rk Tim es stated: “ M a n y scientists w ho had helped develop the bomb raised the same m o ra l question, and the c iv ilia n and m ilita ry leaders o f the T ru m a n adm inis tra tio n were aware of the fr ig h t fu l damage i t w o u ld in flic t on c iv ilia n s w ith in range o f the m ilita r y ta rg e t selected.” (E m phasis added.) T h is is a lie . H iro shima and Nagasaki w ere n o t m il ita ry targets. In fa c t wom en and c h ild re n had been evacuated fro m other parts o f Japan to these tw o cities precisely because they w ere free of m ilita r y targets and w ere therefore presumed to be safe fro m bom bing attack. M ight Roll Em in the Aisles — A n Oct. 25 New Y o rk Tim es dis patch fro m V ie tn a m reported: “ A n o ffe r by Bob Hope to enter ta in A m erican troops in South V ie tn a m has been re g re tfu lly de clined, a U n ite d States m ilita r y spokesman disclosed today. He said i t was considered th a t big a udi ences o f A m erican servicemen w o u ld o ffe r in v itin g targets to C om m unist g u e rrilla s .” Justice a t Work — A year ago Joseph Page, w ho contracted to provide w atchm en fo r N ew Y o rk State construction projects, was accused in a 145-count in d ictm e n t o f grand larceny, fo rg e ry, fra u d and ta x evasion. I t seems Page Thought fo r the Week “ W A S H IN G T O N , Oct. 24 — The difference between w h a t p u b lic m en here say in p u b lic and w h a t they say in p riv a te is greater today than any tim e since the w a r . . , T his is creating a m a jo r p ro b le m fo r President K ennedy . . . w h ile he and his associates go on ta lk in g p u b lic ly about the progress they have made, p riv a te ly they are beginning to fe a r th a t, given the e xistin g fo rm o f A m erican society, and the ex is tin g balance o f p o litic a l pow er, the evils they com plain about sim p ly cannot be rem edied.” — James Reston in the New Y o rk Times. had been padding his p a y ro ll w ith “ p h antom ” w atchm en. The prose c u to r claim ed Page had a cool q u a rte r o f a m illio n tucked away somewhere as a re su lt o f the sw indle. Y e t the charges against h im w ere reduced, w ith o u t e x planation, to one o f second-degree larceny and last week Page dre w a suspended sentence. ■Free-W orld Forces — The A rm y , N a vy and A ir Force have a ll o ffic ia lly rejected a proposal b y the P resident’s Com m ittee on E qual O p p o rtu n ity that, as a last resort, the m ilita r y should have its m en boycott bars and o ther places th a t refuse to serve Negroes. A Problem — N ew Y o rk Times correspondent M a x F ra n k e l de voted an Oct. 25 colum n to the problem s a risin g fro m the U.S.Soviet thaw . He reports there is “ real concern” in W ashington about how to m a in ta in “ the v ig i lance so c a re fu lly developed in the non-C om m unist w o rld .” But, he adds, “ I t is ne ith e r easy n o r pruden t to voice th is concern o u t loud. No one here wishes to con tend th a t the U nited States has a stake in tensions.” G iv in g H is A ll fo r England — “ In London th is w eek a fo rce fu l, plain-speaking Scottish noblem an p u t his name to a docum ent w h ich changed the name b y w h ic h he w ill be kn o w n in the fu tu re . B y th is sim ple, three-second p e rfo rm ance . . . the Rt. Hon. the E a rl o f Home, B aron Douglass and B aron Home in the Peerage o f Scotland and B aron Douglas in the Peerage o f the U nited K ingdom , K n ig h t of the T histle, P rim e M in is te r of G reat B rita in , divests h im s e lf o f titles, m any o f w h ic h have been in his fa m ily since the B a ttle o f Flodden in 1513 . . . In fu tu re the P rim e M in is te r w ill be kno w n as the R ig h t H onorable S ir A le x a n der D ouglas-Hom e, K .T ., — ‘S ir A le c’ fo r short.” — A n Oct. 25 news release fro m the B ritis h In fo rm a tio n Services. SPECIAL 50c INTRODUCTORY OFFER To reach the widest audience w ith our coverage of the Freedom Now Movement we are offering a 4-month introductory subscription to The M ilitan t fo r only 50c Name S treet C ity Zone State Send to T he M ilita n t, 116 U n iv e rs ity Place, N e w Y o rk 3, N . Y . th e Page E ig h t A MILITANT MILITANT M onday, N ovem ber 4, 1963 INTERVIEW DeBerry Raps Union Brass The Frame-Up in Albany, Ga. For Backing Rich Republican B y F re d H alstead L a st A ugust nine A lb a n y , Ga. c iv il rig h ts fig h te rs w ere in dicted b y a fede ra l grand ju ry , three of them on charges o f “ conspiracy” to in tim id a te a federal ju ro r, and the oth e r six on charges of p e r ju r y in connection w ith the case. A m ong the nine are the leaders o f the Negro protest organization, th e A lb a n y M ovem ent. T h is is the fir s t case in w h ich the federal governm ent has ind icte d persons fo r th e ir c iv il rig h ts activitie s. The noted c iv il rig h ts a tto rn e y W illia m K u n s tle r has character ized th e ind ictm en ts as “ a bone th ro w n b y the K ennedy A d m in is tra tio n to the segregationists. T h e y are looking to the 1964 elec tions. W hen they are attacked by th e segregationists th e y can say. Look, we arrested these people too; w e are n o t one-sided’ . . . I t is a sinister and dangerous tre n d .” One o f the “ A lb a n y N in e ” now a w a itin g tr ia l is Jo n i R abinow itz, a 2 2-yea r-o ld A n tio ch College stu dent w ho was in A lb a n y last sum m e r w o rk in g on the S tudent N on v io le n t C o-o rd in a tin g C om m ittee v o te r re g istra tio n pro je ct. She is the o n ly w h ite among the de fendants. M iss R abino w itz visited h e r parents (he r fa th e r is the c iv il Liberties la w ye r V ic to r Ra b in o w itz ) in N ew Y o rk recently, w here I in te rvie w e d her fo r The M ilita n t. First, I the case. asked her to explain “ The w hole th in g started long before I w e n t to A lb a n y . A Negro m an named C h arlie W are had been arrested b y the s h e riff of B a ke r C ounty. W are was hand cuffed b y the s h e riff and then the s h e riff shot h im fo u r times. W are was la te r released and he bro u g h t su it in federal co u rt fo r damages against the s h e riff. The ju r y decided against W are. “ One o f the ju ro rs was a m an Monroe Defendant On Speaking Tour H a ro ld Reape, a 19-year-old Negro yo uth, w ho as a re s u lt of h is fig h t fo r c iv il rig h ts no w faces a 20 y e a r-to -life sentence, is m a k in g a na tio n a l speaking to u r to in fo rm the p u b lic about the events in M onroe, N o rth Carolina. Reape’s a c tiv ity in b u ild in g the M onroe N o n -V io le n t A c tio n Com m itte e in the sum m er o f 1961 w hen the Freedom R iders came to M onroe b ro u g h t h im to the atten tio n o f th a t K K K -d o m in a te d c ity ’s officia ls. A fte r a police-encour aged m ob o f 5,000 racists rio te d against the M N V A C pickets and Freedom Riders, Reape was one o f those singled out b y police fo r in d ictm e n t fo r a “ kid n a p p in g ” w hich n e ver took place. T w o other e q ually innocent young m en were s im ila rly charged. A ll three are o u t on b a il arranged by the C om m ittee to A id the Monroe Defendants. A n o th e r v ic tim o f the racist fra m e -u p , M rs. Mae M a llo ry , is s till fig h t in g e x tra d itio n fro m Ohio. The m a in target o f the w hole fra m e up, M onroe’s fo rm e r N A A C P president, R obert F. W illia m s , fo u n d p o litic a l asylum in Cuba. H a ro ld Reape’s coast-to-coast speaking to u r is being sponsored b y the C om m ittee to A id the M on roe Defendants. Reape has already appeared in B altim ore. He is now in Ohio, being scheduled fo r A k ro n and C leveland fro m Oct. 31 to Nov. 4. He w ill be in D e tr o it Nov. 5-10 and Chicago Nov. 11-13. Those w ho w ish to book m eet ings fo r h im or to in q u ire where meetings addressed b y h im w ill be held, should w rite o r w ire C A M D , P.O. B ox 1314, GPO, N ew Y o rk , N .Y. ju s t file the com plaints. B u t w hen a w h ite m an lost some business and made a com plaint, then the F B I was a ll over the place, and there was a grand ju r y and the w hole b it.” Joni R abino w itz named C a rl S m ith, w ho owned a superm arket in A lb a n y. L ater, the A lb a n y M ovem ent had a cam paign to get Negro clerks hire d in m arkets. T hey negotiated w ith a num ber o f m arkets, in c lu d in g S m ith ’s. S m ith had refused to h ire Negroes except in jobs lik e sweeping floors. Some o f the stores w ere being picketed and boycotted, in c lu d in g S m ith ’s, w hen I was in A lb a n y last sum mer. “ I d id n ’t p icke t any o f the stores. I was new in to w n and was not on any actions then. I d id observe some o f the picke t lines fro m across the street. “ S m ith ’s m a rk e t w e n t out of business, because o f the boycott, I suppose. Then S m ith com plained to the federal a u th o ritie s th a t he had been boycotted, n o t because he refused to h ire Negro clerks, b u t because o f the w a y he had voted as a ju r o r in the W are case. Then the fe d e ra l authorities, the F B I and a ll, moved in w ith a big in ve stig atio n of the A lb a n y M ovem ent. F in a lly about 60 peo ple w ere subpoenaed before a fed e ra l grand ju ry . “ I was one o f them. T hey asked me i f I had seen the p ic k e t lin e in fro n t o f the S m ith store. I to ld them I d id n ’t rem em ber. I t is the sim ple tru th . I had w atched p ic k e tin g a t some stores, b u t I ju s t don’t rem em ber i f the S m ith store was one o f them .” “W hat did they indict yon for then?” “ I was one o f the s ix in dicted fo r p e rju ry . T hey say I lie d when I said I d id n ’t rem em ber. I t is as sim ple as that. “ The others in d icte d fo r p e r ju r y were S later K in g , acting president o f the movem ent, Mrs. G oldie Jackson, secretary, Rev. Samuel W ells, Thomas Chatman and R obert Thomas. T hey say the s ix o f us w ere try in g to cover up the ‘conspiracy.’ ” Those in d icte d fo r “ conspiring to in ju re and influence a federal ju r o r ” are W.G. Anderson, who was president o f the m ovem ent u n til he moved out o f tow n, Rob e rt C olbert, and L u th e r W oodall. “W hat Is the penalty if you are convicted?” “ I t could be fiv e to 10 years I th in k . We are out on bonds o f fro m $2,500 to $5,000. I t ’s r id i culous. The federal governm ent has never touched any o f the w hites w ho have in tim id a te d v o te r re g istra tio n w orkers in A l bany. The m ovem ent’s la w ye r, C. B. K in g has been beaten by the sh e riff. S later K in g ’s w ife was beaten and lost an unborn child. There have been lite ra lly h u n dreds o f ille g a l arrests to in tim i date c iv il rig h ts w orkers. The m ovem ent has com plained about a ll that, b u t the fe d e ra l authorities “Were you arrested on anything beside the perjury charge?” “ Yes, by the local police. Once i t was fo r d is trib u tin g h a n d b ills u rg in g Negroes to vote dow n a bond issue because o f segregated fa c ilitie s . I stayed in ja il 15 days w a itin g fo r tria l. E ig h t o f us fasted nine days.” “ W hen I was arrested, the po lice ch ie f had his secretary search me fo r cigarettes. I was made to s trip to the skin in v ie w o f the male prisoners. We com plained about th a t to the federal govern m ent, b u t n o th in g happened. “ I was arrested a second tim e ju s t w a lk in g dow n the street. They w ere a rresting a ll the w h ite kids on the SNCC s ta ff then fo r “ vagrancy,’.’ T h a t tim e I was in ja il seven days. I was convicted both tim es and given suspended sentences. In ja il th e y took e ve ry th in g aw ay fro m us b u t w e m an aged to hide one tooth brush and a copy o f James B a ld w in ’s “ A n o ther C o u n try.” W e shared the tooth brush and tore B a ld w in in to 10-page sections and passed i t around. “ A n o th e r tim e, the ch ie f o f po lic e threatened to arrest me on the m orals charge o f ‘so lic itin g ’ i f I d id n ’t stop canvassing on the street fo r voters re gistration. We com plained about th a t to the fed eral governm ent too, b u t they d id n ’t convene a grand ju r y .” “How did the voter registration project work?” “ We w o u ld ju s t ta lk to people and tr y to get th e m to go dow n to the re g istra r. P a rt o f the SNCC p rogram is to e xp la in th a t vo tin g is a w a y to im p ro ve liv in g condi tions, by such things as getting Negroes in office, g e ttin g streets paved in the Negro neighborhood, and the sewers fix e d and so on. In th a t p a rt o f Georgia, Negro neighborhoods ju s t don’t get m uch c ity services, streets are m uddy, no street lig h ts, no sidewalks. “W hat were the other SNCC people there like?” “ The SNCC kid s are p re tty m uch lik e o rd in a ry teen-agers. T hey lik e parties and ro ck and ro ll, b u t th e y’d ra th e r go to a mass meeting. T hey are v e ry de dicated. M ost o f them are local people, alm ost a ll Negroes. SNCC goes in to an area o n ly on in v ita tio n b y local people, to help give some organizational kn o w -h o w and d ire ctio n .” “W hat about the adults?” “ W ell, S la te r K in g is about 35. He has six brothers, one o f w hom is C.B. He and his fa m ily are the most courageous people in A l bany. T he young people I m et in A lb a n y w ill never be satisfied w ith things as they are. They w ill fin d one w a y o r another to get e q u a lity. The n o nviolent dem onstrations in 1962 d id n ’t get any where, so the people are w a ry of going thro u g h th a t again. They g enerally look up to M a rtin L u th e r K in g , b u t at the same tim e the m a jo rity o f the Negroes, p a r tic u la rly the young people, are d isillusioned w ith n o n viole n t tac tics. “ T h e ir fa ith in the federal gov ernm ent is changing too. They are m uch m ore c ritic a l now. They kn o w they have to re ly on them selves.” “Now that you are in all this trouble, have you any regrets?” “ W e ll, w e've got good law yers on the case — C.B. K in g , Don H o llo w e ll, H a l W itt, and V ic to r R abinow itz. A n d no m a tte r w h a t happens, I ’l l never be so rry I w e n t to A lb a n y .” N EW Y O R K — C lifto n D eB er ry , S ocialist W orkers candidate fo r coun cilm a n -a t-la rg e in B ro o k ly n , in a statem ent Oct. 29 de nounced the N ew Y o rk C ity Cen tr a l L a b o r C ouncil endorsement o f R epublican R ichard S. A ld ric h fo r coun cilm a n -a t-la rg e in M an hattan. The C entral L a bor C ouncil announced last week its endorse m ent o f A ld ric h , a cousin of G ov e rno r Nelson R ockefeller and — lik e R ockefeller — a m illio n a ire businessman. The C entral L a b o r C ouncil fa ile d to endorse the o n ly trade u n io nist candidates fo r co u n cilm anic seats in M anhattan and B ro o k ly n in the com ing elections. These are D eB erry, a trade union m em ber and a m em ber o f the Ne gro A m erican Labor C ouncil (N A L C ), and R ichard P arrish, S ocialist P a rty candidate fo r M an ha tta n coun cilm an -at-large , lik e wise a trade u nionist and na tio nal treasurer o f N A LC . D e B e rry issued the fo llo w in g statem ent on the C entral Labor C o uncil’s action: “ The endorsement o f the m il lio n a ire R epublican A ld ric h is an act o f p o litic a l scabbery. “ T his s trik e -b re a k in g p o lic y by the heads of the N ew Y o rk A F L C IO is an a rb itra ry and bureau cra tic act. “ The endorsement o f A ld ric h over R ichard P arrish, a union m an and a Negro, is one m ore exam ple o f the b lin d and reac tio n a ry n ational A F L -C IO p o licy of boycotting the c iv il rights struggle. The most d ram atic e x ample o f th a t was the refusal of the A F L -C IO E xecutive C om m it tee to endorse the Aug. 28 M arch on W ashington fo r Jobs and Free dom. “ This is also an in d ire c t attack on the Negro A m erica n Lab o r C ouncil. The w ell-heeled w h ite C lifto n D e B e rry o fficia ld o m o f the A F L -C IO has taken a d im vie w o f the N A L C since its inception because i t was organized to free the unions, as w e ll as in d u stry, o f d iscrim in a tion. “ A . P h ilip Randolph, a vice president o f the A F L -C IO , p resi dent o f the Sleeping Car Porters union, and president o f the Negro A m erican L a b o r C ouncil, is one o f the sponsors of R ichard P a r ris h ’s candidacy. B u t the so-called trad e union ‘leaders’ on th e Cen tr a l Lab o r C ouncil p re fe r to sup p o rt a ric h w h ite businessman. “ Speaking fo r the S ocialist W orkers P a rty I w ill g la d ly jo in w ith the S ocialist P a rty and w ith M r. P a rrish and M r. R andolph in a jo in t statem ent to protest the C e ntral L a b o r C ou ncil’s fa ilu re to support the Freedom N ow stru g gle and represent la b o r’s tru e in terests in the p o litic a l arena.” New Haven Negro Candidate Blasts Both M ajor Parties R aym ond H . Paige, independent Negro candidate fo r m ayor o f N ew Haven, in a recent speech assailed charges b y D em ocratic T ow n C hairm an A r th u r B a rb ie ri th a t he was a “ stooge” fo r the Republican P a rty. In re p ly in g to B a rb ie ri’s charge, Paige said: “ In m y fir s t state m ent to the press, I made i t clear th a t I fe lt n e ith e r p a rty , Demo crats o r Republicans, was a frie n d o f the N egro.” “ The R epublican P a rty is k n ow n,” he continued, “ as the spokesman fo r B ig Business and the open in stru m e n t o f the banks, the b ig corporations and the real estate interests. The Democrats are a tool o f the racists and the R aym ond H . Paige pow er stru ctu re in a m ore deceit fu l w ay. T hey get po p u la r sup p o rt b y paying lip service to the cause o f Negro e q u a lity. This should be apparent in the recent se ll-o u t o f the C iv il R ights B ill In Congress accomplished b y R obert K ennedy . . . b u t the R epublican p a rty is no better. “ C e rta in ly the ro le o f H e n ry Townshend [R epublican candi date] in the pow er stru ctu re o f N ew Haven should n o t be ne glected w hen the voters go to the polls. W hat are his b a n king con nections, and w h a t are the re la tions o f these banks to Negroes w ho apply fo r loans? H o w m any Negroes are em ployed in bu si nesses in w h ich H e n ry Townshend has connections? H ow m any Ne gro tenants are there in real estate in w hich H e n ry Townshend has connections?” Paige said th a t Townshend’s campaign had “ fa ile d to indicate or dram atize the m ain issues in w h ich Negroes are interested such as housing, education, the high unem ploym ent rate and a ll the problem s th a t are p a rt o f con tin u in g poverty. “ We cannot expect any k in d of positive results to im prove these conditions fro m eith e r p a rty ,” he said, “ and i t is fo r th is reason th a t I am ru n n in g . . . as an In dependent. I anticipate th a t large num bers of Negroes w ho have voted D em ocratic or R epublican in the past, w ill vote fo r me and I expect th a t honest w h ite liberals and progressives w ill see throug h the Tweedle Dee and Tweedle D um p o litic a l shell game o f both parties.”
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz