The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation! Evidence From

The Role of Independent
Directors in Corporate Groups
The Corporate Governance of Group Companies
Korea Development Institute
A.C. Pritchard
University of Michigan Law School
1 November 2004
Separation of Ownership & Control
™Insider domination ™Independent
directors
¾Information
Asymmetry
¾Discretion
¾Access to
information
¾Power to curtail
discretion
2
Crisis & Reform
Financial crisis
of 1997-1998
Accounting scandals
of 2001-2002
3
Chaebol
™ Enormous separation of ownership and
control
¾ 75% voting > 13% cash flow (Kim & Sung 2004)
4
Consequences
™Manipulation of ownership interest by
controlling shareholders
¾Controlling shareholders benefit from
acquisitions (Bae, Kang, & Kim 2002)
¾Controlling shareholders allocate ownership
interests to most profitable members of the
group (Kim & Sung 2004)
¾Controlling shareholders limit exposure to
members of group with high risk (Chang 2003)
5
Reform in Korea
™Explicit fiduciary duties
¾More easily enforceable via law suit
™Independent directors
¾Board majority
¾2/3 of audit committee
6
Dispersed public ownership
™Managers, not controlling shareholders,
are the concern
¾Few shareholders with more than a small
percentage of shares
¾Independent directors overcome collective
action problem
7
Role of independent directors
™No correlation with profitability
™Important role at salient times
¾Takeovers
—Greater premia
—Less hubris
¾Replacement of poor-performing CEOs
™Mixed evidence that independent directors
enhance accuracy in disclosure
8
Reform in the U.S.
™ Focus on enhancing the accuracy of financial
statements
¾ Relationship with auditors central focus
™ Audit committees must be exclusively
independent directors
¾ Auditors must report to audit committee
™ Majority independent directors on board
¾ Independent nominating committee
¾ Independent compensation committee
9
Korea v. U.S.
Korea
United States
Board
> 50 % independent
> 50 % independent
Audit
Committee
Required
67 % independent directors
Required
100 % independent directors
“Financial sophistication” or “financial literacy”
Auditors must report to audit committee
Nominating
committee
Required for outside directors
Required
100% independent directors on committee or
>50% of all independent directors
Compensation
committee
Not required
Required
100% independent directors or
> 50% of all independent directors
Related-party
transactions
Board approval required
Independent directors’ approval required
(otherwise subject to legal challenge)
Cumulative
voting
Required if no opt out in
charter; most firms have opted
out
Permissible, but not required and not common
10
More reform for Korea?
Korea
United States
Board
> 50 % independent
> 50 % independent
Audit
Committee
Required
67 % independent directors
Required
100 % independent directors
“Financial sophistication” or “financial literacy”
Auditors must report to audit committee
Nominating
committee
Required for outside directors
Required
100% independent directors on committee or
>50% of all independent directors
Compensation
committee
Not required
Required
100% independent directors or
> 50% of all independent directors
Related-party
transactions
Board approval required
Independent directors’ approval required
(otherwise subject to legal challenge)
Cumulative
voting
Required if no opt out in
charter; most firms have opted
out
Permissible, but not required and not common
11
Too much reform for U.S.?
Korea
United States
Board
> 50 % independent
> 50 % independent
Audit
Committee
Required
67 % independent directors
Required
100 % independent directors
“Financial sophistication” or “financial literacy”
Auditors must report to audit committee
Nominating
committee
Required for outside directors
Required
100% independent directors on committee or
>50% of all independent directors
Compensation
committee
Not required
Required
100% independent directors or
> 50% of all independent directors
Related-party
transactions
Board approval required
Independent directors’ approval required
(otherwise subject to legal challenge)
Cumulative
voting
Required if no opt out in
charter; most firms have opted
out
Permissible, but not required and not common
12