PNP Next Generation Investigation
The core components of DIDM IT SOLUTIONS are the enhanced e-Blotter or Crime
Information Reporting and Analysis System (CIRAS); Case Information Database
Management System (CIDMS); Case Management and Analysis System (CMAS); eSubpoena System; e-Rogues Gallery and, e-Warrant System.
IT Solutions
CIDMS
for CASE FOLDERS
CIRAS
CMAS
e SUBPOENA
e WARRANT
e ROGUES
CIRAS
The enhanced e-Blotter or CIRAS will be interfaced with Geographic Information System
(GIS) to evolve into a Qualitative Crime Analysis Management Tool. CIRAS will also be able
to incorporate or access data from different e-projects of the PNP. These modifications of
the e-Blotter system will enhance the ability of the field commanders to conduct qualitative
crime analysis more efficiently and more accurately. The core objective of CIRAS is to serve
as a scientific management tool for efficient and effective prescription of police intervention.
It provides a logical basis for effective and efficient police intervention. It Overlays other data
sets - localities, AORs, critical facilities and structures, troop deployment and movement,
etc.; and Build a robust IT infrastructure to support the entire system. It specifically serves
as a crime database; Identify crime hot spots along with other trends and patterns; Use of
spatial (space) and time series analysis.
1 of 22
2 of 22
Period Covered: January- December 2015 as of March 27,
2016
%
Crime Volume Crime Volume
Generation
PRO generated from generated from Variance
of CIRAS
UCPER
the e-Blotter
(D/B) X 100
1 40,429
40,095
-334
99.17%
2 13,095
13,580
485
103.70%
3 57,224
53,063
-4,161 92.73%
4A 46,848
46,675
-173
99.63%
4B 8,386
8,713
327
103.90%
5 42,020
40,148
-1,872 95.54%
6 62,031
64,887
2,856
104.60%
7 64,437
63,437
-1,000 98.45%
8 21,104
20,717
-387
98.17%
9 25,943
27,708
1,765
106.80%
10 36,142
40,732
4,590
112.70%
11 33,886
31,092
-2,794 91.75%
12 33,717
32,868
-849
97.48%
13 14,331
13,944
-387
97.30%
ARMM 4,243
4,040
-203
95.22%
COR 19,612
19,648
36
100.18%
NCRPO 152,368
153,516
1,148
100.75%
TOTAL 675,816
674,863
-953
99.86%
*Brgy cases were
counted to the PNP’s
blotter book.
Brgy case was counted
to the PNP’s blotter
book.
* ±5% margin of error due to system imperfections:

Intermittent internet connections

Power failure
3 of 22
Period Covered: January to February 2016 (as of March 27,
2016)
PRO
Crime Volume Crime Volume
% Generation of
Variance
(UCPER)
(e-Blotter)
CIRS (D/B)X 100
1 5,108
2 2,025
3 9,101
4A 8,016
4B 907
5 6,088
6 6,867
7 13,301
8 2,711
9 3,546
10 4,508
11 5,080
12 4,475
13 2,080
ARMM 772
COR 2,440
NCRPO 23,777
4,139
2,004
4,342
6,786
950
5,855
4,873
9,640
2,488
3,651
3,524
4,476
4,293
1,872
471
2,370
23,997
-969
-21
-4,759
-1,230
43
-233
-1,994
-3,661
-223
105
-984
-604
-182
-208
-301
-70
220
81.03%
98.96%
47.71%
84.66%
104.74%
96.17%
70.96%
72.48%
91.77%
102.96%
78.17%
88.11%
95.93%
90.00%
61.01%
97.13%
100.93%
TOTAL 100,802
85,731
-15,071 85.05%
Reason for Discrepancy:
*some Brgy cases were
counted to PNP blotter
4 of 22
CIDMS
The CIDMS is a visual intelligence analysis environment that can optimize the value of
massive amounts of information, allowing the analysts to quickly collate, analyze and
visualize complex data from different sources.
The Case Information Database Management System (CIDMS) is not just a repository of
case folders. It is the investigator’s digital notebook and a database system used to monitor
cases initially on TF USIG cases which was developed by ITMS and first used by CIDG.
CIDMS
Hard copies
01
CASE FOLDERS
03
02
Easy Access and Retrieval
ELECTRONIC FILE
SYSTEM
Reduce to Digital Files
DATABASE
The CIDMS was revised to cope with the requirements of TF USIG Secretariat. Its front-end
was developed using visual basic.net and its back-end uses SQL server. Currently, it is
installed in seven workstations at TF USIG Secretariat. TF USIG has already started
encoding cases into the system.
5 of 22
NOTES:
1. Case Folders Encoded is based on After Activity Reports, Memos and Emails sent to DIDM from Regional Offices.
2. PRO2, PRO8, PRO11, PRO12, and PROCOR already submitted Cascading After Activity Reports, but is yet to submit info on
number of case folders encoded.
6 of 22
CMAS
The Case Management and Analysis System (CMAS) utilize the i2 Analyst Notebook which
analyzes data information for the timely dissemination of information to operating/field units.
It is an IT Solution designed to help investigators in the management and analysis of
investigative data.
Shown is a sample screenshot of how the CMAS works.
7 of 22
Cases Encoded into the CMAS
(as of March 27, 2016)
PROs
1
2
3
4A
4B
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NCR
COR
ARMM
CIDG
TOTAL
No. of Cases Encoded No. of Trained Personnel No. of Workstations
15
2
1
9
2
1
5
2
1
61
2
1
17
2
1
15
2
1
1
2
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
10
2
1
1
2
1
7
2
1
13
2
1
8
2
1
13
15
6
2
2
1
2
2
1
308
29
29
491
75
50
8 of 22
e-Subpoena
The e-Subpoena System was developed through the Memorandum of Agreement signed
between the PNP, Supreme Court and Department of Justice. It aims for a cost-effective
delivery of subpoenas and other court documents to the PNP units. Since everything is
accomplished online, the cost for paper and courier is no longer a burden while there will be
no more delays, and the records are easily within reach.
How does it work?
The Judicial Courts shall send the various subpoenas to particular PNP units through an email and the COP shall ensure that the documents are delivered and received by the
concerned personnel on time. The Crime Registrar shall encode details of the subpoena for
its compliance in the court duties monitoring system. The DIDM shall monitor all reports
needed and prepare necessary reports to the Courts.
At present, there are three (3) areas using the system (Quezon City, Cebu City and Lapulapu City). Some gaps were identified on the e-Subpoena that we hope to address: the
JSCC decides on the roll out schedule of Court personnel training, and not the PNP that is
why there are only 3 working areas using the e-Subpoena System; and the slow
connectivity.
PNP OFFICES/STATIONS
JUDICIAL COURTS
• 3 areas using
the system –
Quezon City,
Cebu City and
Lapu-Lapu City
DIDM
PROs
PPOs
• Proposed sites
 Pasay City
 Makati City
 Manila
Feedback
9 of 22
Period Covered: January 1 to December 31, 2015
eNot
Acknowledged
Subpoena
Acknowledged
13,394
18,428
Subject
Upcoming Postponed
Not
for
Attended
Hearings Hearings
Attended
Feedback
2,827
348
15,125
2,045
18,413
5,365
e-Subpoena - Recap of Acknowledged, Not Acknowledged, Attended, Not
Attended (with all offices/stations)
Period Covered: January 1 to December 31, 2015
Office/Station Acknowledged
DIDM
NCRPO
QCPD
MPD
EPD
SPD
NPD
PRO3
PRO7
1,831
658
15,741
0
6
39
11
14
128
TOTAL
18,428
Not
Not
Attended
Acknowledged
Attended
624
1,666
819
223
375
328
1,789
16,257
4,138
75
24
43
31
20
21
1
26
4
11
14
8
27
2
4
46
29
0
2,827
18,413
5,365*
*4,276 for/under PCE, SHP, Dropped and close, Exonerated,
Case Dismissed (covered period: April 30, 2014 to February 17, 2016) – data from PCE-DIDM
*Others:
- postponed/reset hearing, holidays, AWOL, compulsorily retired
- cannot be located, misspelled name of PNCO
- optionally/compulsorily retired, posthumously separated
- dropped from the roll, dismissed, suspended
- human error (attend but in the system not attended)
- repeated name with the same criminal case no.
- explained, names not included in the PAIS
10 of 22
Period Covered: January 1 to March 27, 2016
eNot
Acknowledged
Subpoena
Acknowledged
2,674
2,811
1,387
Subject
Upcoming Postponed
Not
for
Attended
Hearings Hearings
Attended
Feedback
2,630
2,630
392
3,070
768
e-Subpoena - Recap of Acknowledged, Not Acknowledged, Attended, Not
Attended (with all offices/stations)
Period Covered: January 1 to March 27, 2016
Office/Station Acknowledged
Not
Not
Attended
Acknowledged
Attended
DIDM
NCRPO
QCPD
MPD
EPD
SPD
NPD
PRO3
PRO7
402
111
1,920
0
0
4
3
300
71
252
133
911
13
8
0
4
47
19
346
161
2,536
4
1
3
3
0
16
89
76
588
4
5
0
5
0
1
TOTAL
2,811
1,387
3,070
768*
* postponed/reset hearing, holidays, AWOL, compulsorily retired
* cannot be located, misspelled name of PNCO
* optionally/compulsorily retired, posthumously separated
* dropped from the roll, dismissed, suspended
* human error (attend but in the system not attended)
* repeated name with the same criminal case no.
11 of 22
e-Rogues and e-Warrant
The e-Warrant System is a system where all warrants of arrest will be electronically
documented so that they can be accessed through computers. Developed by a team of
Information Technology Experts from Information Technology Management System (ITMS)
and Directorate for Investigation and Detection Management (DIDM), the e-Warrant
eliminates the hassle bugging snail mail system of delivering a warrant to a particular police
station. The warrants accessed by the police through the system will facilitate the
apprehension of a criminal because a warrant can be sent by email, printed out, and served.
The warrant although not the original, but a faithful digital copy thereof, will facilitate the
apprehension of a criminal because of the knowledge by the arresting officer that a warrant
is pending for the former’s arrest.
The e-Rouges Gallery System on the other hand, is an electronic rogues’ gallery of
wanted persons that will provide every police station in the country an access to data on
criminals to include pictures that are in the files of police units in the country. Through eRogues Gallery, for example, the records of an individual or a suspect wanted for a crime in
Quezon City can be instantly accessed by a police station in Butuan City with just a click of
their fingers at the system. Unlike the e-Blotter, which is a stand-alone system, the eWarrant System and e Rouges Gallery Systems, require internet access or information
highway for its implementation.
12 of 22
Update on the Compliance to e-Warrant
Period Covered: CY 2015
PROs
Warrants of Arrest Received Warrants of Arrest Uploaded
%
1
3,164
2,797
88.40%
2
3,923
4,006
102.12%
3
8,459
5,369
63.47%
4A
9,191
11,447
124.55%
4B
2,063
2,219
107.56%
5
3,953
4,472
113.13%
6
1,517
2,068
136.32%
7
5,803
5,556
95.74%
8
1,955
1,965
100.51%
9
1,262
2,012
159.43%
10
4,302
2,253
52.37%
11
3,035
3,173
104.55%
12
1,695
1,787
105.43%
13
1,221
2,027
166.01%
ARMM
142
87
61.27%
COR
3,405
2,755
80.91%
NCRPO
15,293
9,741
63.70%
TOTAL
70,383
63,734
13 of 22
Update on the Compliance to e-Warrant
Period Covered: January to February 2016
PROs
Warrants of Arrest Received Warrants of Arrest Uploaded
1
2
3
4A
4B
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ARMM
COR
NCRPO
463
777
1,750
1,356
329
591
181
629
343
258
397
207
240
348
35
379
1,209
722
516
828
1,184
343
598
223
548
102
295
500
98
207
117
6
435
887
TOTAL
9,492
7,609
%
155.94%
66.41%
47.31%
87.32%
104.26%
101.18%
123.20%
87.12%
29.74%
114.34%
125.94%
47.34%
86.25%
33.62%
17.14%
114.78%
73.37%
14 of 22
Update on the Compliance to e-Rogue System
Period Covered: CY 2015
1
Number of Persons
Arrested
6,841
Mug shots Uploaded
for the Period
6,349
92.81%
2
5,654
5,350
94.62%
3
13,844
13,816
99.80%
4A
4B
29,964
4,305
31,474
4,481
105.04%
104.09%
5
6
7
8
12,941
17,493
15,381
4,950
13,514
15,963
Technical Problem
3,963
104.43%
91.25%
0.00%
80.06%
9
4,974
5,083
102.19%
10
11
6,217
7,398
6,914
7,565
111.21%
102.26%
12
4,206
4,043
96.12%
13
ARMM
3,404
670
3,255
595
95.62%
88.81%
COR
3,320
3,192
96.14%
NCRPO
17,850
25,647
143.68%
TOTAL
159,412
151,204
PROs
%
*Note: Discrepancies are the result of double uploads due to system imperfections such as intermittent internet connections.
15 of 22
Update on the Compliance to e-Rogue System
Period Covered: January to March 27, 2016
PROs
1
2
3
4A
4B
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ARMM
COR
NCRPO
TOTAL
Number of Persons Mug shots Uploaded
Arrested
for the Period
1,252
1,125
614
882
2,671
1,880
5,425
5,063
657
661
1,911
2,045
883
2,121
2,205
Technical Problem
864
589
698
747
874
1,654
910
951
645
575
630
457
167
77
536
497
4,720
4,049
25,662
%
89.86%
143.65%
70.39%
93.33%
100.61%
107.01%
240.20%
0.00%
68.17%
107.02%
189.24%
104.51%
89.15%
72.54%
46.11%
92.72%
85.78%
23,373
*Note: Discrepancies are the result of double uploads due to system imperfections such as intermittent internet connections.
16 of 22
Bantay Krimen Mobile App
Another extra efforts taken by the DIDM to promote crime awareness, reporting and
prevention is the launching of the Bantay Krimen Mobile App on March 16, 2016 at the NHQ
Lobby, Camp Crame, Quezon City.
The Bantay Krimen Mobile App was created through the collaboration between the
University of the Cordilleras and the Directorate for Investigation and Detective
Management. It highlights the following features:
17 of 22
1. View Crime Incidents – Users can view crime incidents by logging in and setting
the area or location they wanted to view. They can view information such as, address,
modality, date, time, and reporting unit. This can be viewed by clicking an icon in the map.
Users can also filter location by setting the radius of a specific area of crime incidence they
wanted to see. Crime incidences within the defined radius will be displayed and counted.
Filters for date, time, and crime type can also be set by the users.
Crime incidents shown in the mobile app are from the official blotter reports from police
stations. The mobile app with crime incidences with background map can also be viewed in
an offline mode.
18 of 22
2. Call the Nearest Police Station - With just a click away, this feature enables users
to report on-going crimes or emergencies to the nearest police station located by GPS or
they can manually select Police Stations by the number provided in the app. The device
GPS must be turned on for more accurate use of the device.
19 of 22
3. Hotspot Notification - With the GPS on, users can be notified on proximity of a
crime hotspot zone. Notifications will be sent by the app as a message prompting the
distance from a hotspot zone or if the user is already within the hotspot zone area. Users
can set to turn-on the hotspot notification, enable sound, or enable the vibration of the
device.
20 of 22
4. Report Crimes - Using the mobile application, crimes can be reported in real time
and be displayed in the dashboard and map of monitoring police stations. Reporting can be
forwarded through the app or through the web. Report type includes normal reporting and
SOS reporting. Normal reporting enables users to provide information about previously
committed crimes. Whereas, SOS reports are reported in real time location and time, this is
for incidents that require immediate action
21 of 22
5. Crime Reporting Dashboard - The crime reported is stored in a web database
where police officers can monitor and respond to the reported crimes. Aside from the
database, reports are also viewed in a map to rationalize the deployment of resources.
For the initial release, the app is limited to PNP force multipliers for further innovation,
the app will soon be available to the citizens through the google playstore. As its way
forward, features such as device synchronizing, crime incident accuracy, report ticketing
system, report analytics, photo and video upload, GPS tracking of mobile units, and user
suggestions will be incorporated in the newer version of the app and the dashboard.
22 of 22