C.2 Validating Survey
C.2.1. Questionnaire / Methodology
A second local survey was held in February 2011. The survey was developed by SSL/IPTS
in order to gather additional information on critical needs and priorities in the priority areas,
and to complement the baseline assessment exercise. In contrast to the first questionnaire of
October 2010, which aimed at collecting the opinions of the public on which are the
priorities regarding local development, the second questionnaire focused on receiving an
institutional and expertise feedback from the institutions, which were in charge of
addressing the priorities identified by the SG. By having open, semi-structured questions
(with precise options to choose), the aim was to see whether the actions proposed were the
appropriate ones.
The sample was “institutional” in the sense that it included representatives from all local
institutions (stakeholders both from local institutions, business groups and civil society).
This was also a way to increase the participatory approach by including in the project all
those local experts/institutions not part of the SG. The open questions aimed also at
collecting some qualitative information in order to have a clearer picture of the socioeconomic situation at the local level considering the lack of available data.
The open questions and the sample of questionnaire were the result of the need to expand
the participatory approach to local stakeholders, to collect feedback for our strategy and to
collect additional qualitative data. The sampling approach for the selection of respondents
was as follows. Four respondents were randomly selected from each of the six categories of
representatives (municipalities, branches of central government offices; chambers of
commerce, business development organizations; farmers, and representatives of agricultural
associations; hotel and restaurant owners and other tourism operators; higher education
organisations (universities, technical schools); training providers). Some minor exceptions
are possible with regard to small municipalities. The “country” sample is, however, equally
distributed amongst the six groups, and age and gender are also equally distributed among
the sample.
Questionnaire
Question 1: (Open question)
What would be for you an attractive label (a logo with a slogan) for the Drina-Tara region
that could be used to promote local products, tourism in the area, and attract investment?
Question 2a:
What do you think are the potentials of the following “tourism products” in your
municipality?
Spa tourism; Special adventure sports tourism (paragliding, rafting, climbing…); Summer
mountain tourism: hiking, camping; Winter mountain tourism; Cultural tourism, religious
and patrimonial or local traditions (food etc); Rural tourism staying farms/rural facilities.
(Open follow-up question)
Are there any other potential “tourism products” in your municipality?
Question 3a:
95
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise the
potentials in tourism?
• Utilise biodiversity and natural resources for tourism
•
Increase environment protection
•
Promote regionally labelled food and beverages
•
Promote organic food production as a means to attract tourists and increase trade of
food
•
Increase collaboration in managing the assets of the Drina-Tara Park or other parks
in the region (BiH and Montenegro)
•
Joint tourism signage in the entire region
•
Joint institution and website and other promotion material (brochure) to increase the
attention on tourism possibilities in the Drina-Tara region
•
Increase the quantity of hospitality services
•
Increase the quality of hospitality services
•
Increase accessibility to the Drina-Tara region including public transport
possibilities to better connect different parts of the region
Question 3b:
Are there any other, not listed here, important activities that need to be promoted to realise
the potentials in tourism? Please name the two for you most relevant activities.
In an earlier questionnaire, agriculture was identified as offering key potentials for local
development in the Drina-Tara region.
Extra question:
What do you think are the potentials of the following agri-food sectors in your
municipality?
• Fruit
•
Dairy
•
Meat products
•
Honey
Extra question:
Are there any other potential agri-food sectors in your municipality?
Question 4a:
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise the
potentials of the agri-food sector and rural developement?
96
•
Improve the skills level of the agricultural workforce (i.e. technical:
pest/fertiliser/soil
management
skills;
and/or
organisational/businessrelated/entrepreneurial skills, including market-oriented/supply chain-related
knowledge to be acquired?);
•
Improve the endowment of physical capital (machinery) of agricultural production –
specify: tractors? Irrigation systems? Storage facilities?
•
Improve market infrastructure for local sales – what type? In terms of location of
local markets? Facilities on site? Roads? – name the roads…
•
Improve market infrastructure for national sales (i.e. associations?)
•
Improve market infrastructure for international sales (i.e. networks?)
•
Promote organic food production – give an example of the particular good
•
Increase linkages between the tourism and agricultural industry – give example
•
Improve local rural public infrastructures and services other than transport (e.g.
water access)
•
Improve the transport infrastructure (roads, transport) specify the road or transport
mean-.
Question 4b:
Are there any other, not listed here, important activities? Please name the two for you most
relevant activities:
• Private sector development – business creation and growth of existing firms
Question 5a:
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise the
potentials?
• Create awareness amongst the young, highly skilled and talented (e.g., university
graduates) about entrepreneurial opportunities in the Drina-Tara region / how?
Through a conference, a website, local meetings?
•
Support business creation by young, highly skilled and talented (e.g., university
graduates) building an incubation centre? What else?
•
Increase links between research (also in very applied contexts, such as agricultural
production) and existing firms – identification of key research topics or potential
connections? What is the need they have? Specific seed to cope with agro-climatic
constraints?
•
Facilitate the placement of university graduates and young researchers in local firms
•
Increase access to finance for SMEs (guarantee funds, subsidised loan schemes)
•
Provide training for SME managers – could think of specific courses / needs
•
Provide training for SME staff language – writing skills?
97
•
Facilitate diaspora investment in local businesses
Question 5b:
Are there any other, not listed here, important activities? Please name the two for you most
relevant activities:
Question 6a:
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise the
potentials of natural resources for local development?
• Improve waste collection
•
Improve waste management
•
Improve the protection and conservation of biodiversity
•
Improve water sewage treatment
•
Improve river and springs protection
•
Increase eco inspection and other forms of law enforcement
Question 6b:
Are there any other, not listed here, important activities? Please name the two for you most
relevant activities.
Figure 1
Profile respondents per municipality
98
Figure 2
Gender of respondents per municipality
Figure 3
Age of respondents per municipality
99
C.2.2. Results
a. Slogan/Logo
Question 1:
What would be for you an attractive label (a logo with a slogan) for the Drina-Tara region
that could be used to promote local products, tourism in the area, and attract investment?
On the first question of validating survey concerning the options for an attractive label to
promote the Drina-Tara region and local products (question 1), many respondents chose a
label with correlations to the region’s agricultural and natural resources. Most respondents
from Serbia referred to the Tara Mountain and the Drina river as main symbols. One
respondent from Uzice, for instance, formulated the slogan “River, mountain, Drina &
Tara: Green Embrace”. Another respondent from Uzice argued for “River and mountain Harmony of untouched nature”. A respondent from Prijepolje came up with: “Two rivers,
together for a better future”. Equally, respondents from Bosnia-Herzegovina mostly
invoked the natural resources of the region, but some also pointed to the promotion of
agriculture and organic food as a main symbol, as conveyed in the slogan “Live and eat
healthy” (Bratunac). In any case, most of the slogans or logos proposed reflected tourism,
natural resources and agriculture as key aspects.
b. Priorities
Priority 1: Tourism
Question 2a:
What do you think are the potentials of the following “tourism products” in your
municipality?
100
Figure 3
Improvement of activities to stimulate tourism
(total score per answer, divided by municipality)
101
Figure 4
Survey response regarding various types of tourism
(total score per answer, divided by tourist sector)
102
103
Figures 5a-5d Survey response regarding various types of tourism
(percentage response per answer, divided by municipality)
104
105
106
107
108
109
Question 3a
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realize the
potentials in tourism?
Figure 6
Most important tourism-related activities to be developed
(total score per question, per municipality) 1
The average score corresponds to the weighted average of the responses values weighted by their
number of occurrence, where the value of "very important"/"high" is 2, "Important"/"high but too
many barriers" is 1, "not important"/"low" is -1 and "don't know" is 0.
1
110
Figure 7
Most important tourism-related activities to be developed
(total score per question)
111
112
113
114
115
Figures 8a-8j Survey response regarding various types of tourism
(percentage reponse per answer, divided
116
by
municipality)
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
Priority 2: Agriculture and Rural Development
Extra question
What do you think are the potentials of the following agri-food sectors in your
municipality?
Figure 9
Potentials of distinct products in the agri-food sector and rural development
(total score per municipality and per type of answer) 2
The average score corresponds to the weighted average of the responses values weighted by their
number of occurrence, where the value of "very important"/"high" is 2, "Important"/"high but too
many barriers" is 1, "not important"/"low" is -1 and "don't know" is 0.
2
126
Figure 10
Potentials of distinct products in the agri-food sector and rural development
(total score per agricultural sector)
127
128
Figures 11a-11d
Survey response regarding different agricultural products
(percentage response per answer, divided by municipality)
129
130
131
132
Question 4a
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise the
potentials of the agri-food sector and rural development?
Figure 12
Potentials of distinct activities in the agri-food sector and rural development
(total score per municipality and per type of answer) 3
The average score corresponds to the weighted average of the responses values weighted by their
number of occurrence, where the value of "very important"/"high" is 2, "Important"/"high but too
many barriers" is 1, "not important"/"low" is -1 and "don't know" is 0.
3
133
Figure 13
Potentials of distinct activities in the agri-food sector and rural development
(total score per type of answer)
134
135
136
137
138
Figures 14a-14i
Potential activities regarding the agri-food sector
(percentage of respondents per answer, divided by municipality)
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
Priority 3: SME and entrepreneurship development
Question 5a
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise SME
and entrepreneurial potentials?
Figure 15
Potential activities regarding SME and entrepreneurship
(totale score per answer, divided by municipality) 4
The average score corresponds to the weighted average of the responses values weighted by their
number of occurrence, where the value of "very important"/"high" is 2, "Important"/"high but too
many barriers" is 1, "not important"/"low" is -1 and "don't know" is 0.
4
148
Figures 16
Potential activities regarding SME and entrepreneurship
(total score per answer)
149
150
151
152
Figures 17a-17h
Potential activities regarding
(total percentage, per answer, per municipality)
153
SME
and
entrepreneurship
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
Priority 4: Environmental protection
Question 6a
What are in your opinion the important activities to be undertaken in order to realise the
potentials of natural resources for local development?
Figure 18
Potential activities regarding the environmental
(total score per answer, divided by municipality) 5
The average score corresponds to the weighted average of the responses values weighted by their
number of occurrence, where the value of "very important"/"high" is 2, "Important"/"high but too
many barriers" is 1, "not important"/"low" is -1 and "don't know" is 0.
5
161
Figure 19
Potential activities regarding the environment
(total score per answer)
162
163
Figures 20a-20f
Potential activities regarding environmental protection
(percentage response per answer, per
municipality)
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
ANNEX D
Vital Statistics of the Drina –Tara Region (2005 – 2008)
171
ANNEX D: Vital Statistics of the Drina –Tara Region (2005 – 2008)
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
172
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
173
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
174
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
Montenegro
175
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
176
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
Bosnia Herzegovina
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
177
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
178
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
179
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
180
Source: Statistical Yearbooks
181
ANNEX E
Experience of CSO's youth programmes in Serbian Municipalities of the Drina Tara –
Appraisals of local agents
182
ANNEX E: Experience of CSO's youth programmes in Serbian Municipalities of the
Drina Tara – Appraisals of local agents
Uzice
•
In Uzice, civil society organizations focus on vulnerable groups such as refugees and
internally displaced persons, persons with disabilities, including children and youth,
persons with disabilities and so on. More and more in everyday life we are witnessing
the activities implemented by organizations engaged in protecting women, promoting
women rights through education, health and economic programs,. As for the young,
they participate in the areas defined by the national strategy for youth (education,
environmental protection, activism, safety, leisure, information). But young people are
only fictitiously included in decision-making in Uzice, because institutions that have to
deal with young people do not do that. This is one of the last municipalities in the
country that created the office of youth but, the coordinators there have no office, no
budget, no phone .... Despite this, It is important to note the establishment (in march
2011) of an Umbrella organization which will gather 7 NGOs dealing with youth
issues.
Cajetina
•
In this municipality there is an NGO "Zlatibor Circle", which, in support of the
Ministry of Youth and Sports, in the period 2007-2009 implemented several projects for
youth, including the establishment of youth organizations CMOK, which has been an
active partner with “Zlatibor Circle” in youth activities for several years. Part of this
project was the establishment of the Office for Youth, which is now independently and
in cooperation with the "Zlatibor Circle"and local institutions organizing youth
programs.
•
NGO's took part in the Balkan Community Initiatives Fund project in 2008. - "We are
in the program" aimed at strengthening activism of youth. They launched several local
media projects: Youth Radio show, which aired every Saturday and Youth newspaper
that have come out once a month.
•
In 2009, representatives of "Zlatibor Circle" also participated in the process of
developing the Local Action Plan for Youth, adopted by parliament in January 2010.
This NGO is particularly encouraging youth volunteering, which is also part of
prevention of socially unacceptable behavior, violence and juvenile delinquency.
•
Members of "Zlatibor Circle" are also members of the Council for Gender Equality,
Council for Social Policy of Cajetina municipality.
Priboj
•
According to the results of the conducted programs of the Local action plan, young
183
people have participated in most of the following areas:
•
Culture: Some innovations were introduced in this field, such as the theater section of
young amateurs who, with the assistance of the Office for Youth, realized theatrical
performances and thus enrich the cultural offer to citizens. The Office for Youth has
made archaeological sites in the function of a basis for developing educational
programs for youth.
•
Sport: an extraordinary turnout of young people in amateur tournaments and school
sport. Education: noticeable interest of participants in various aspects of informal
education and youth influence on the content and quality of the education process.
•
To a lesser extent, young people are involved in the field of health and social welfare,
economics and the field of youth entrepreneurship. Due to the extremely weak market
and a weak business sector young people seek their opportunity in larger cities, so
interest of young people in this area is net.
•
In the scope of local government, the young seem quite indifferent, except when they are
in political parties. They think that the local government, but also the school system and
other institutions do not take them into account so their participation in decisionmaking process. For example, the Office for Youth was able to arrange an "empty
chair" at the Assembly of municipality so that young people had a right to express their
views and to participate in some discussions but not to decide and vote. Therefore,
response of young people to engage and express their opinion was very small .
Ljubovija
•
Young people are not active in any area, except business sector. A major problem is the
young people are leaving from Ljubovija and those who remain act passively.
•
Young people could participate and do a lot in terms of cultural life, sports and
promotion of healthy life in this municipality. They could deal with the protection of
their environment, only if they wanted to.
Source: SG / Local coordinators SSL
184
ANNEX F:
Individual fiches per municipality on local strategy documents & donors in the area
185
ANNEX F: Individual fiches per municipality on local strategy documents & donors
in the area
Ljubovija
Local Strategy
Municipality/city
Contacts:
Country
cordinates
Region
Area
Population
Main industries
Local strategic
paper
Duration
Main strategic
development
areas:
Municipality of Ljubovija
Tel. 015 661-411, opsljub @ ptt.rs
Republic of Serbia
Geodetic latitude: 44,05 - 44,19,
longitude: 19,17 – 19,37.
Mačvanski County
35.600 ha
17292 (Census 2002.)
Agriculture
Increasing employment of local population in development of
agriculture, tourism, environment protection and ecology
Development of healthy environment and increased utilization of
natural resources (potentialls)
Donor Map not available (currently there are no donors)
186
Užice
Local Strategy
Municipality/city
Contacts:
Country
cordinates
Region
Area
Population
Main industries
Local strategic paper
Duration
Main strategic development
areas:
City of Užice
Address: Dimitrija Tucovića br.52
Tel:+381 31 590 190, Fax: +381 31 513 499
E-mail: [email protected], Web: www.graduzice.rs
Serbia
Southeast Europe
Geodetic latitude from 430 59'’ to 430 42'’N; geodetic longitude from 190 24'’ to
190 59” E
Zlatibor District
667Km2
83 022
• Metalprocessing industry
• Agriculture
• Tourism
City of Uzice development programme
2008-2015
1. Demographic policy
2. Economy ( entrepreneurship, rural development, tourism )
3. Environment protection
4. Transport and infrastructure
5. Education
6. Health
7. Culture
8. Sport
9. Intermunicipal and regional
10. Local selfgovernment development
Donor Map
1. EU Delegation--Operating Grant to enhance operations of Regional Development Agency “Zlatibor“
(ZRDA)- Location of project: Zlatibor Region.
2. SDC-Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation- The Private Sector Development in South-West
Serbia
3. Program Geographical Information System-60% Local Government and 40% SDC
4. EU-CBIB (Cross Border Institution Building-IPA)-Support youth entrepreneurship
5. EU Delegation-Construction of building for protected housing
6. EU Delegation-(Exchange 3)-Municipal Cultural Centre
7. Construction of regional landfill “Duboko”-European Bank for Reconstruction and Development,
Delegation of European Commission, The Government of Sweden through SIDA Agency approved a grant
for the rehabilitation of landslides and French Government
8. CBC SRB-MNE-Public utility Company Nikšić and Public utility Vodovod Užice-Development of
Geographic Information system (GIS) of water supply and severage network
9. CBC SRB-MNE- Public utility Company Nikšić and Public utility Vodovod Užice-Reduction of loses and
optimisation of water supply system
10. Edcation for Sustainable Development in the Western Balkans-the Government of Finland
11. IPA CBC SRB BiH- Youth leadership in social cohesion and cross-border cooperation, Uzice Child Right
Centre and Foundation for Creative Development
187
Čajetina
Local Strategy not available
Donor Map
SDC-Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation-The Private Sector Development in
South-West Serbia
IPA CBC SRB MNE – Construction o laboratories for microbiological testing of milk
EU (Exchange 3) –GIS-A Key to Development of New Zlatibor
188
Priboj
Local Strategy not availalbe
Donor Map
1. SDC-Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation- The Private Sector Development
in South-West Serbia
2. IPA CBC SRB BiH-Ecological Binoculars-Municipalities Priboj and Rudo
3.IPA CBC SRB BiH-Lim International Biathlon Priboj-Rudo (Setihovo)-TO Priboj and
Municipal development Agency Rudo
189
Prijepolje
Local Strategy
Municipality/city
Main industries
Prijepolje
Food industry, textile industry, wood industry
Local strategic paper
Duration
Vision of local government
Strategy of sustainable development Prijepolje
2011-2015
The Municipality is healthy, for the life of an attractive and well organized community with a
good environment for a uniform socio-economic progress with respect to ecological principles,
principles of multi-ethnicity and the rights of citizens.
Main strategic development areas:
General goal 1: Improve the economic development of the municipality
Specific objective 1: Improving the development of small and medium enterprises and shops
Specific objective 2: Improvement of agricultural
Specific objective 3: Improve development tourism
Specific objective 4: Attracting investment and creation of positive business climate
General goal 2: Improvement of existing and construction of new infrastructure
Specific objective 1: Making spatial planning and investment technical documentation
Specific objective 2: Promotion and development of community and traffic infrastructure in
urban and suburban area
Specific objective 3: promotion and development of traffic and utilities infrastructure in rural
area
General goal 3: Environmental protection and use of natural resources
Specific objective 1: Institutional support in the field of environmental protection
Specific objective 2: Education of citizens on the promotion and preservation of environmental
Specific objective 3: Management of municipal waste and other
Specific objective 4: stimulus green economy
Specific objective 5: Protection of biodiversity
General goal 4: Social development and management in public sector
Specific objective 1: Improving the work of municipal administration and public enterprises and
institutions
Specific objective 2: Improving social and health care
Specific objective 3: Capacity building for the development and promotion of education ,
culture and sports
Specific objective 4: Improve and promotion of cultural and historical heritage Specific
objective 5: Strengthen civil society and involving citizens
Donor Map
1. SDC-Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation- The Private Sector Development
in South-West Serbia
2. IPA CBC SRB BiH-Eco centre Čajniče-Municipalities Prijepolje and Čajniče
3. IPA CBC SRB MNE-Sustainable tourism for Equal Opportunities-Municipalities
Prijepolje and Berane
4. The Municipality in cooperation with the municipalities of Nova Varos and Priboj project "Development of the business climate through increasing the capacity of the Office
of local economic growth municipalities in Nova Varos, Priboj and Prijepolje. Owner of the
project is the municipality of Nova Varos. In addition to education and professional training
ward will get the equipment necessary for work and have the opportunity to meet with
municipalities in Slovenia, which is successfully dealing with local economic development.
The project is funded by the European Union.
190
Pljevlja
Local Strategy not available
Donor Map
1. IPA CBC SRB MNE - Sustainable Biking Development - 15.12.2010.
2. IPA CBC BIH MNE - Growing Sustainable Practices for protection, promotion and
management of natural resources -01.01.2011.
3. Support to Local Self Government Reform : Municipal Development Grants for Small
Infrastructure Projects - Modernizing Parking Infrastructure (Provisionally selected)
2011
4. USAID funded Local Economic Development in Northern Montenegro Program-01.
10.2010.
191
Bijelo Polje
Local Strategy not available
Donor Map
1. TICA-Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency-Construction of
primary school in the village Godijevo
2. The World bank for development-Reconstruction of the health centre
3. European Agency for Development-Reconstruction of the Cultural Centre
4. CHF International-Reconstruction of the Local Centre Rasovo
5. CHF International- Asphalt road Gubavac-Bistrica
192
Bratunac
Local Strategy:
Bratunac Strategy
The vision of the municipality is based on achieving the following values:
1. Valuing education and skills development,
2. Promotion of new technologies,
3. Infrastructure
4. Tourism,
5. Recognition of the private sector and agriculture as the major and leading power in
employment,
6. Natural wealth
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
In accordance with the future vision of the municipality, identified the following strategic
objectives:
Strategic bjective 1:
Improve Infrastructure
Strategic bjective 2:
Improve working conditions for local government
Strategic bjective 3:
Improve agricultural production
Strategic bjective 4:
Increase the level of employment through the encouragement of
private enterprise
Tourism Development
Strategic bjective 5:
Strategic bjective 6:
Improving interpersonal relationships and mutual respect and
tolerance among citizens
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
Agricultural land, non-metal minerals, waterways and forests, as natural resources,
whose exploitation does not require large investments finansijaka, are very important
direction of strengthening the activities in terms of agriculture, livestock, production of
building materials, forest exploitation and wood processing. Bearing in mind that in the
municipality there is a long-standing tradition in these sectors, one of the first steps in their
revival of the rehabilitation, reconstruction and putting into operation of neglected and
abandoned facilities (fertile land, mini farm, purchase stations, orchards and malinjaci,
separation and brickyard, sawmill and wood processing plants). However, construction of
small processing facilities and food processing plants, would create, along with modest
investments, multiple positive effects, expressed by reducing the high unemployment rate,
and finalization of the product would allow the market realizes higher profits than the sale
193
of raw materials and intermediate goods, with special emphasis on organic production and
orientation to provide a healthy safe food.
Since the above does not exhaust the natural resources only in its use-value, the next
strategic priority is the development of tourism and catering. Given that tourism is
developed any form (hunting, fishing, spa, sports and recreation, rural, transit or other) is
inconceivable without a high level of infrastructure, activities should be directed towards
reconstruction and modernization of road network (local paving gravel roads and
rehabilitation of main roads), solving the problem of waste and storm water in the county,
and in particular to prevent further spillage of sewage system in the Drina River through the
construction of the collector, then to the repair depot, raising environmental awareness, and
to rebuild facilities and expansion of tourism offer, the development of complementary
activities (modernization of border trade, service and craft facilities, transportation, and
enrichment of cultural and artistic events in the city, creative and artistic expression).
Bratunac
Donor Map not available
194
Milići
Local Strategy:
F R O M V I S IO N T O O P E R A T I O N A L O B J E K T I V E S
Strategic
Operational objectives
Operational obje ctives
objektives
VISION
M i l i c i m u n i c i p a l i t i e s w i l l 2 0 1 5 t h y e a r t o b e a m o d e rn , ec o n o m i c a l l y d e v e l o p e d a n d s p a t i a l l y re g u l a t e d c o m m u n i t y t h a t w i l l
f e a tu r e
a
hi gh
d eg r e e
of
d e v e l o p m e n t o f s o c i a l s e r v i c e s , e f f ec t i v e l o c a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , b u i l t t h e n e c e s s a r y i n f r a s t r u c t u re , e n v i ro n m en t a n d e c o l o g i c a l l y
c le a n
p r o t e c t e d i n a c c o rd a n c e w i t h E u r o p e a n s t a n d a rd s a n d t h e e n v i r o n m e n t b a s e d o n c i v i l a n d d e m o c r a t i c p ri n c i p l e s , h u m a n r i g h t s
a n d g o o d i n t e r- e t h n i c t o l e ra n c e .
S t r a t e g ic o b j e k t iv e 1 .
E c o n o m ic D e v e lo p m e n t
a n d E m p lo y m e n t
S tr a t e g i c o b je k ti v e 2 .
I n fr a s t r u c t u r e a n d
e n v ir o n m e n ta l
E n v ir o n m e n t
S t r a t e g ic o b j e k t iv e
3.
E d u c a t io n , c u l tu r e
a n d s p o r ts
S tr a t e g i c o b je k t i v e
4.
S o c i a l an d h ea l t h
p r o t e c tio n
S t r a te g i c o b j e k t i v e 5 .
P u b l i c a d m i n i s t ra t i o n
a n d c iv il s o c ie ty
O p e r a t io n a l o b j e k t iv e
1.
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 1 . in
c r e a tin g t h e c o n d iti o n s
a n d in s titu tio n a l
f r a m e w o r k fo r e c o n o m i c
d e ve l op m e nt
O p e r a t i o n a l o b je k ti v e
1.
B y t he e n d of 20 1 5. T he
m u n ic ip a litie s w i th
w a t e r s u p p ly
c o m p le te ly r e s o lv e d ,
b u ilt a se w a g e sy ste m
a n d p u r if ic a tio n o f
w a s te a n d s e w a g e
O p e r a t io n al
o b j e k t iv e 1 .
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 .
T h e e d u c a tio n a l
p r o c e s s a t a ll le v e ls
o f e d u c a tio n in
a c c o r d a n c e w ith
e d u c a tio n a l
st a nd a r d s
O p e ra t i o n a l
o b j e k t iv e 1 .
B y t he e n d o f 2 0 15 .
T h e i m p ro v e d h e a l t h
c a re a n d q u a l i t y o f
s e rv i c e s i n
a c c o r d a n c e w it h th e
L a w o n H e a l th C a r e
O p e r a t io n a l o b j e k t iv e
2.
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 . T h e
im p r o v e d e c o n o m ic
d e ve l op m e nt
s u b j e c t s a n d i n c re a s e d
e m p lo y m e n t b y 3 0 % in
th is s e c to r
O p e r a t i o n a l o b je k ti v e
2.
B y t he e n d of 20 1 5. w a s
b u ilt 3 5 k m a sp h a lt
r o a d s, a sp h a lt a ll th e
s tr e e ts, p r o p e r
m a in te n a n c e
g r a v e l r o a d s, b u ilt
b r id g e s , p a r k in g lo ts
a n d o t h e r i n fr a s t ru c t u r e
O p e r a t io n al
o b j e k t iv e 2 .
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 .
T h e i n f r a s t ru c t u r e
o f c u ltu r e in th e
f u n c ti o n a n d q u a li ty
o f c u ltu r a l a c tiv itie s
in a c c o r d a n c e w ith
th e n e e d s o f c itiz e n s
O p e ra t i o n a l
o b j e k t iv e 2 .
B y t he e n d o f 2 0 15 .
T h e str e n g t h e n e d
c a p a c it y o f th e
C e n tr e f o r S o c i a l
W e lf a r e , i m p r o v e d
s o c i a l p r o te c tio n ,
s o c i a l m ap u p d a t e d
O p e r a ti o n a l o b j e k t i v e
1.
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 . T h e
l o c a l g o v e rn m e n t i s
f u ll y f u n c ti o n a l c itiz e n s,
a n d p u b l i c f i n a n ci a l
m a n a g e m e n t , m u n ic ip a l
p ro p e rt y a n d l o c a l
d e v e l o p m e n t i s fu l l y
c o m p lia n t w ith
le g i sla ti o n
O p e r a ti o n a l o b j e k t i v e
2
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 . T h e
str e n g th e n e d c a p a c it y o f
c iv il so c ie ty to
p a rt i c i p a t e a c t i v e l y i n
p u b lic a f f a ir s
O p e r a t io n a l o b j e k t iv e
3.
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 . T h e
i m p r o v e d a g r i c u l t u ra l
p r o d u c tio n a n d
p r o c e s sin g o f
a g r ic u ltu r a l p r o d u c ts
O p e r a t i o n a l o b je k ti v e
3.
B y t he e n d of 20 1 5. T he
f u lly d e v e lo p e d sp a tia lp la n n in g d o c u m e n ta tio n
O p e r a t io n al
o b j e k t iv e 3 .
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 .
T h e p r o v id e d
m a te r ia l a n d
te c h n ic a l
c o n d i t i o n s , r e p a i re d
a n d u p g r a d e d s p o r ts
f a c i l i t i e s s p o rt s
O p e r a t io n a l o b j e k t iv e
4.
B y th e e n d o f 2 0 1 5 . T h e
i m p r o v e d t o u r i s m o ff e r
a n d q u a lity o f to u r is m
se r v ic e s
O p e r a t i o n a l o b je k ti v e
4
B y t he e n d of 20 1 5. T he
p r o te c te d a l l t h e m a jo r
s o u r c e s o f d r in k in g
w a t e r a n d r eg u l a t e d
r iv e r b e d s Z . a n d S .
J a d a r o d la g n ja r e so lv e d
t h e is su e o f so lid w a st e
a n d str e n g th e n e d
c a p a c it y f o r
e n v ir o n m e n ta l
p r o te c tio n
O p e r a t i o n a l o b je k ti v e
5.
B y t he e n d of 20 1 5. T he
f u l l y re c o n s t r u c t e d
lo w v o l ta g e n e tw o r k ,
r e so lv e d th e i ssu e o f
c en t r a l h e a t i n g a n d t h e
i ssu e o f
t e le c o m m u n i c a tio n s
Donor Map not avaible
195
Srebrenica
Local Strategy:
Srebrenica Strategy
VISION
2013th The Srebrenica will be a viable multi-ethnic community, social security, solidarity and
responsible citizens, spatial planning governed, economically developed and coach
attractive environment.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
Our commitment is balanced development of municipalities
1. Strategic Goal: The community built on vrjednostima civil society
Operational objectives
1.1. Building efficient, accountable and transparent public institutions,
1.2. Strengthening the capacity of educational institutions,
1.3. Strengthening the capacity of cultural and sports institutions and organizations.
1.4. Supporting the work of NGOs,
1.5. Strengthening institutional capacities in the field of health and social care
1.6. Better information and information flow,
1.7. Made a partnership of citizens, public, private and NGO sector,
1.8. Special care for the marginalized-vulnerable categories,
1.9. Construction of multi-ethnic and multi-religious tolerance,
1.10. Caring for children, youth and young married couples,
2. Strategic objective: Spatial planning and environmental planning regulated environment
with the developed Infrastructure
Operational objectives
2.1. Development of spatial planning documents,
2.2. Ecological planning and development of environmental awareness,
2.3. Improving transport infrastructure
2.4. Electrification,
2.5. Improvement of municipal infrastructure,
2.6. Protection and use of water resources,
2.7. Construction of residential and commercial buildings,
2.8. Anti-mine activities
3. Strategic goal; developed successfully promoted tourism and cultural and historical
heritage
Operational objectives
3.1. The construction of tourism infrastructure and supply,
3.2. Revitalization of tourism (health, religious, memorial, sports rekrativni)
3.3. Promote tourism and cultural and historical heritage,
3.4. Strengthening tourism organizations and tourism agencies,
196
3.5. Designation and protection of cultural heritage sites,
3.6. Development of the private sector with travel offers,
3.7. Zoning hunting and fishing areas and the balance of game,
3.8. Healthy food, and ..........
4. Strategic Goal: Developed poljoprivredai rural area
Operational objectives
4.1. Development and improvement of primary agricultural production,
4.2. Development of agricultural infrastructure,
4.3. Construction of processing facilities,
5. Strategic goal, created their own regional development
Operational objectives
5.1. The construction of business zones,
5.2. Effective use of natural resources,
5.3. Strengthening the capacity of businesses, business associations and organizations,
5.4. Strengthening cooperation with relevant stakeholders at local, regional, entity, state
and international levels,
5.5. Sub-legal solutions to development incentives and tax breaks,
5.6. Special economic status,
5.7. Capacity building and introduction of innovative technologies,
Srebrenica
Donor Map
Not yet available
197
Višegrad
Local Strategy:
Višegrad strategy
Development strategy of the municipality of Visegrad 2011th -2016 year is to arouse the
interest of all stakeholders of development partner efforts because many issues have been
resolved more efficiently, particularly in the better use of resources, attracting investment and
joint design of projects for participation in the pre-accession EU funds. Key natural resources
in the municipality as forests, water (rivers, springs, thermal water reservoirs), mineral
resources for construction (limestone, dolomite, tuff, gabbro, rihječni sand, etc.).. natural and
cultural-historical heritage. Visegrad 2020 - city, who often visited by lovers of the world's
cultural heritage and the narrow gauge railway from all over the world. Place in which to keep
all the passing, as they welcome the cordial and friendly people with excellent food and
beverage amenities and the unique program of healthy living in South East Europe. A
municipality that motivates and supports company owners and entrepreneurs to expand their
operations. Place that is happy to return the young and educated people leaving school.
Environment that cares for its oldest citizens.
Objective 1: Create a business environment to attract investment and create new workplaces
Visegrad municipality plans to improve the operation it was responsible and which affect the
affordability of the business environment. This primarily refers to the simplification and
Transparency complicated bureaucratic procedures and rules. In addition, the municipality
plans to improve the physical environment for business development by investing in the
location and office space.
Objective 2: The intensive development of tourism and agriculture
The key elements essential for the development of tourism in Visegrad were:
• the person and work of Ivo Andric,
• Mehmed Pasha Sokolovic,
• narrow-gauge railroad Visegrad-Wet worse
• Spa Vilina hair.
These are the sites and attractions that should be improved and trained to become the
backbone of development and other forms of tourism, including the transit, since the Visegrad
is situated in one of the major tourist routes of transit in the RS. In addition to the main
tourism product, Visegrad municipality plans to work on the development of complementary
forms turzma. Farms that opredjele for intensive production with emphasis on fruit and
vegetables and livestock, provide consolidated financial and nonfinancial support. In order to
support the development of tourism, it is necessary to work toward improving the local
infrastructure, particularly rural. On the other hand, the infrastructure necessary for
agriculture development, and thus to improve life in the country.
Objective 3: Development of services tailored to the needs of citizens
Visegrad municipality is committed to its citizens the services of high quality. In order to
achieve this, the municipality plans to improve its administration and implementation of the
program: The development of modern local government - human resources, processes and
procedures. The municipality is planning over the next five years, improve services: primary
health care, education of children, cultural services and to improve support for social
integration of the population. To achieve this, the local government will enhance cooperation
with civil society, in particular with those NGOs that can contribute to improving the quality
of life of citizens.
198
Objective 4: Protection and preservation of the environment
Protect and preserve the environment, requires the establishment of systematic monitoring
(monitoring) state of the environment, environmental awareness podizanjea citizens, on the
other hand solving "pressing" issues that were identified in this area in the Visegrad
municipality, and construction of the missing and modernization of existing infrastructure
(collectors , water, sewage, sanitary landfills).
Donor Map not available
199
Rudo
Local Strategy:
Rudo Strategy
Vision of the development of the Municipality Rudo until 2020:
Rudo Municipality will through rational use of natural and economic resources to achieve
sustainable economic growth with full employment, which will be guaranteed personal and
material security of citizens and allowed a normal life with a secured social and health care,
quality education, culture, sport and local government in service citizens.
Objective 1:
Using a
favorable
geographical
position, the
opening
Municipalities
for all types of
cooperation,
regional
networking
Objective 1.1:
Continuous
participation in
the Regional
Development
Agencies
(REDRIN,
SERDA)
Objective 2
(Environment):
Environmental
protection,
natural
resources,
kullturno - of
historical
heritage and
their rational
use.
Objective 2.1:
Preservation and
promotion of
healthy
environment
Objective 3
(Economic
Development):
Economic
Restructuring
and
revitalization of
economic trends
Objective 4
(Infrastructure):
Construction
and building of
infrastructure
and housing
standards in
urban and rural
areas.
Objective 5
(Social
Development):
Creating a stable
socio-political
climate and
business
environment.
Objective 3.1:
Raising
economic
activity
Objective 4.1:
Construction,
reconstruction
and
modernization
of infrastructure
Objective 5.1:
The introduction
of modern
standards in
local governance
Objective 2.2:
Protection, use
of replacement
of natural
resources
Objective 3.2:
Establishment of
new and revival
of the old
business ties
Objective 4.2:
Organized
approach to
defining and
managing
housing in the
municipality
Objective 2.3:
Protection and
use of cultural,
historical and
natural heritage
Donor Map not available
200
Objective 5.2:
Strengthening
the social
activities of
citizens in the
function
Goražde
Local Strategy:
Goražde Strategy
OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
VISIO
N
Gorazde will 2014. to be economically developed, spatially regulated, environmentally
clean and safe community where the continuous improvement of living standard of
responsible public administration work in partnership with citizens.
Development
goal 1:
Improve
service quality
and efficiency
of public
administration,
and with the
participation
of citizens to
enhance the
capacity for
partnership
activities and
management
of local
development.
Operational
objective 1.1.
Until 2009, the
building
blocks,
technical and
human
capacities of
the municipal
administration
for quality
service
delivery,
planning and
management
of local
development.
Development
goal 2:
Increase the
employment
rate of
entrepreneurship
development,
attracting new
investment,
exploitation of
natural
resources, and
stimulating
agricultural
development,
rural tourism
and excursion.
Operational
objective 2.1.
By 2014, the
increased
number of
registered legal
entities and
trades from the
current 20 to 40
(per 1,000)
Development
goal 3:
Ensure access to
quality drinking
void, improve
regional
planning and
further develop
transport,
housing and
infrastructure,
and
environmental.
Development
goal 4:
Provide access
to quality
health and
social care for
all residents of
municipalities,
especially rural
populations and
vulnerable
groups.
Development
goal 5:
Improve
quality and
ensure equal
access to
education for
all children,
and enable
further
development
of cultural and
sports life.
Operational
objective 3.1.
By 2014 for
90% of the
population
provided safe
drinking water,
90% of
households
connected to
public sewerage
and water and
other natural
resources are
protected from
pollution.
Operational
objective 4.1.
By 2012.
provided
sufficient
infrastructure,
organization,
personnel and
technical
capacities of
institutions and
NGOs in the
field of social
and health care.
Operational
objective 5.1.
In 2008. 30%
of children
enrolled in
preschool
education,
with an
increase of
10% every
year.
Operational
201
Operational
objective 1.2.
By 2012. In a
developed
capacity and
quality
partnerships
between local
communities,
civil society
organizations
and
municipalities,
youth and
women make
up at least 1 /
3 of the
working
bodies of the
MOH.
Operational
objective 2.2.
By 2012. in the
agricultural
production, with
300 registered
employees.
Operational
objektive 2.3.
By 2012. In a
developed
infrastructure,
software and
human capacity
in tourism.
Operational
objective 3.2.
By 2010. in
resolved the
issue of solid
waste in
accordance with
environmental
regulations,
improved soil
protection and
reduced risk of
mines.
Operational
objective 3.3.
By 2014.
renovated
housing, and
secured the
development and
maintenance of
an adequate
network of road
communications.
202
Operational
objective 4.2.
By 2012.
provided
appropriate
support to
identified
vulnerable
population
groups in the
area of social
and health care,
and established
a quality
system
communicating
with residents
about their
rights.
Operational
objective 5.3.
By 2010,
provided
economic and
physical
access,
preschool,
primary and
secondary
education for
all, especially
for the
vulnerable and
children from
the remotest
areas of the
municipality.
Operational
objective 5.4.
By 2012.
system of
education
adapted to the
labor market
and general
developments
in the region
and BiH.
Operational
objective 3.4.
By 2010. was
adopted
adequate spatial
and urban
planning
documents, and
started activities
in the
implementation
of spatial
planning.
Donor Map not available
203
Operational
objective 5.5.
By 2012. in
improved
infrastructure,
technical and
human
capacities of
institutions
and
organizations
in the field of
sport and
culture,
especially in
rural areas.
ANNEX G:
Original SWOT Analysis prepared by the Stakeholder Group
204
Annex G: Original SWOT Analysis prepared by the Stakeholder Group
SWOT analysis of tourism
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Good geo-strategic position and high
frequency of cross-border circulation
High valued historical and cultural
heritage and multiculturalism in
area
Preserved nature in mountains, rural
areas and water and thermal
resources
Hospitality and openness of local
people
High offer of tourism events
Well-known tourism destinations in
all three countries
Access to health and domestic food
Existence
of
local
tourism
organizations in all three countries
Existence of tourism development
strategies in all three countries
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
OPPORTUNITIES
•
S
•
•
T
O
U
•
I
•
R
M
•
•
•
•
Development
of
eco,
ethno,
mountain, spa and tourism based on
special interests,
Reconstruction
of
road
infrastructure, regional airports an
development
of
tourism
infrastructure and supra- structure
Potential of Drina and Tara rivers for
tourism development
Support to SMEs in tourism and
hospitality services
Trends in tourism market ( increased
number of holidays/per year)
Rural households are interesting to
work in rural tourism for rural
tourism
Synergy of tourism and agriculture
Donors interest to finance activities
focused on tourism development
Introduction
of
public-private
partnership model in tourism sector.
Unmaintained and underdeveloped road and
railway infrastructure
Lack of advanced courses of study in travel and
tourism
The lack of tourism supra-structure within
existing tourism destination
The lack of high quality establishments with
international standard facilities
Inexistence of integrated tourism product of
Drina Tara region
The lack of tourism signage
Old and ruined transport facilities in transport
enterprises
The lack of new tourism vocations
Insufficient number of qualified tourist guides
and tourist escorts
Uncoordinated protection of cultural heritage
The lack of standards in tourism offer
Insufficient participation of cultural institutions
in tourism offer
Inexistence of DMO
THREATS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
205
Lack of cooperation and coordination of
activities in tourism sector
Pollution of area caused by uncontrolled and
unplanned construction activities
The level of area protection( National Parks)
could limit further tourism development
More competitive destinations in surrounding
Negative migration trends in rural areas
Devastated cultural heritage
Inadequate image of area
SWOT analysis of agriculture and rural
development
Strengths
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
P
M
E
N
T
•
•
•
•
E
L
•
•
•
Natural resources (air, land, water, forests)
The diversity of plant and animal species
The richness of pure spring-waters and
rivers
The existence of geo-thermal resources
The great diversity of terrain (plains and
mountains)
Large areas under the forests
The diversity of plant life
Large areas of arable land
Good use of agricultural land
Preserved and healthy nature in the
villages
Surface streams suitable for fishing and
for others supporting touristic activities
Large amounts of mineral mining
The existing spa-centres and special
nature reserves
Preserved natural resources for the
development of organic production
Interest of local government towards the
adoption of strategic documents and
finding investors
The interest of farmers for the
introduction of new and modern
production technologies
An export-oriented region
Developed infrastructure in the winter
touristic centres
D
E
V
•
Weaknesses
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
L
A
•
R
•
•
•
R
•
•
U
•
206
Irresponsible attitude towards natural resources
Fragmented land properties
Out of date of the existing machinery
Structure of land property is not suitable for
intensive agricultural production
Unused potential for rural tourism
Undeveloped organic farming
Low level of cooperation of agricultural
producers with scientific institutions
Unused potential for agricultural development
Unused of water capacity (construction of minihydropower plants on small watercourses)
Unused resources for the development of
alternative branch of agriculture-beekeeping,
herbs, forest fruits
Unplanned and wild deforestation
Contamination of soil and water due to the lack
of rural landfills and sewage
Soil pollution from uncontrolled use of
agricultural protection measures (pesticides...)
Awareness of the conservation of endemic plant
species at a low level
Unplanned construction in villages that spoils
the appearance of the natural environment
Low penalties for those who endanger the
natural resources
Low utilization of rivers for irrigation
Lack of presence of professional and inspection
services
Lack of value added in agriculture, low levels
of innovation of production
Limited investment resources and the
centralization of investment
Poor quality of road network
A small number of categorized accommodation
facilities in rural households
Poor coverage of radio and television signals
and signals of mobile telephony in rural areas
A small number of agricultural associations and
cooperatives
Weak financial power of farmers
Low education of people in rural areas
Possibilities
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Threats
The development of alternative branches of
agriculture(beekeeping, fishing, herbs, forest fruits)
The development of alternative recourses of energy
The development of organic production
Introduction of new processing methods
into
agriculture
The development of rural and eco tourism
Construction of mini-hydropower plants on small
watercourses
Increase secondary wood processing
Use a pure river and lake water flows for development
of fishing tourism
The planned use and regulation of forests
Exploitation of mineral resources
Better utilization of arable land
Better utilization of favourable agricultural conditions
The use of water resources for irrigation
Construction of modern systems for irrigation and
fertilization
Better utilization of natural resources in the research
and tourism purposes
Increased education of the rural population
Association of producers in associations and
cooperatives
Subsidizing agricultural production
Employment of Rural population
Training of farmers on good producing practices and
standards that require countries that import agricultural
products
Strictly controlled quality product
The introduction of the GlobalGAP standards in
agricultural production
Incentives for Export
More intensive development of agricultural production
(livestock, fruit, vegetables)
Renovation and construction of new roads in rural
areas
Utilization of the IPA pre-accession funds in the
revitalization of rural economy
Utilization of funds offered by the Ministry and the
NIP in infrastructure investment
Increase the number of small and medium enterprises,
start-up businesses using the start-up loans
Directing money to underdeveloped areas
Planned and integrative development of the Region
The potential in producing electricity from thermal
power and hydropower potential
207
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Transition (social and economic crisis)
Difficult exports of agricultural products
Rigorous control of product safety in foreign countries
Large foreign competition
Depopulation of rural areas and reducing the number of
rural people
Others branded products from the Region
Large agricultural land in state ownership
Non-compliance of state and municipal plans for land
and water use
Wild and unplanned construction
The terrain configuration is unfavourable for the
application of agricultural machinery
Unfavourable geographic location
Insufficient awareness of people on sustainable
development
Clearly defined ownership and right of use of
agricultural land
Low participation of flat terrain in the structure of
agricultural land
Poorly constructed access road network
Limited use of natural resources in protected areas of
water courses
Small incentives of local government and Ministry of
agriculture
Lack of plans and planning documents
Unsatisfactory credit terms
Incomplete legislation
Poor implementation of the protocol adopted at the
municipal and republic level
SWOT
Analysis
SME
Entrepreneurship Development
and
WEAKNESSES
•
•
•
s
r
•
•
•
•
The existence of regional and local
institutions for SME support (RDA,
RCC, offices for local economic
development
The existence of the region Sava - Drina
- Majevica in order to support more
intensive inter-municipal cooperation
Experience in cross-border cooperation
A significant number of existing SMEs
and entrepreneurs in the Region
Basic transportation services and
infrastructure
The existence of the industrial base for
wood, food, processing industry, textile
and chemical industry
Plenty of available natural resources
that provide support to economic
development
Large hydropower and thermal power
potential
S
E
M
n
E
t
r
s
e
p
r
e
n
e
•
•
u
h
i
a
p
n
d
STRENGTHS
208
•
•
•
•
•
•
The lack of political framework for local
economic development- decentralization
issuse
Lack of institutional support to foreign and
domestic investors as an obstacle to
modernization and restructuring of arreas and
non-competitive industrial and agricultural
resources of the border areas
Unsatisfactory conditions for attracting
foreign direct investment
Lack of managerial skills and inadequate
support to business growth and hinders the
development of SME sector
Low level of the competitiveness of the SME
sector
Low level of innovation
The SME sector is composed of micro
businesses with limited possibility for
employment generation
OPPORTUNITIES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
THREATS
•
The existing potential for growth in the
number of SMEs from both sides of the
border
Establishment of fiscal decentralization
and Property decentralization
Increase the competitiveness and
innovativeness of the SME sector
through cooperation between research
institutions and industrial development
and expansion of networks between
economic sectors (north of the border
area)
The existence of free trade agreements in
Central Europe (CEFTA) - chance to
increase the export potential
Increased access to funding sources
Utilization of cluster resources - joint
development of business clusters
Building
strategic
infrastructure
capacity, and capacity in strategic
planning and implementation of
Promoting cooperation and partnerships
between public and private sector
The possibility of creating a common
brand of unique products, features and
services of the border area
Potential training programs designed for
the SME sector which aim is to satisfy
EU standards
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
209
Slow implementation of national and
regional strategies in this area
Emergence of new competition from
market liberalization
Insufficient of support services developed
SME
Inadequate credit policy of the SME
sector
Inadequate incentives, subsidies, tax
incentives to promote employment,
innovation and investment in SME sector
The existing administrative barriers to
business
The negative general economic trends in
the border area
Entrepreneurs do not have sufficient
access to high quality services that help
them be more competitive in the market
The centralization of decision-making
municipal hinders cooperation at local
level
Box 4: SWOT Analysis Environmental Protection
STRENGTHS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
T
•
•
•
•
The richness of biodiversity
Rich and unused nature resources
Water resources – plenty for water supply
Large unpolluted areas under the forests
Presence of National Parks
Protected natural resources
Existence of legislation and planning
documents
Relevant institutions at the local
(municipality) level
Budget funds from environmental taxes
NGOs active in environmental protection
EU recommendations on sustainable
development
Initiated political
frameworks
for
establishing regional landfills at regional
and cross-border level
E
O
N
N
•
WEAKNESSES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
M
I
•
N
T
•
E
P
N
R
V
O
I
T
R
E
O
C
•
•
•
210
Lack of project documentation
(prefeasibility, feasibility studies,
cost-benefit analyses)
Inadequate treatment parts of
environment
protection
by
local/regional strategic documents
Inadequate enforcement of Law for
environment protection
Inadequate working of inspections
for environment protection
Lack of continuous monitoring
Inadequate use of available financial
resources
Insufficient cooperation between
NGO sector and local community
Lack
of
organized
waste
management
Lack of regional landfills and
recycling centres
Lack of systems for disposal of solid
waste, recycling, sewage treatment
and sewage systems
The existence of a large number of
illegal landfills
Endangered flora and fauna
Lack of skilled staff
Undeveloped
environmental
awareness
OPPORTUNITIES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
THREATS
Adopting sustainable development concept
Use of renewable energy resources
Consistent enforcement of the law
Regressive measures (penalty politics)
Developing LEAP (Local Environmental Action
Plan for the Protection of the environment) and
other strategic documents and consistent
application
Regional and inter-municipal cooperation
Financial decentralization in order to strengthen
local capacity to deal with issues of environment
protection - Retention of environmental taxes,
where the pollutants are
Financing of NGO’s environmental projects by
local governments
The presence of funds for this purpose (preaccession and EU structural funds)
Creating a database of pollutants and controlling
them (Development of a common access to
information on major polluters)
Joint programs for the revitalization of existing
and construction of new landfills
Regional initiatives for the preservation of
natural resources
Exchange of knowledge and good practice in
the field of environmental protection
Protection of certain areas as a source of ecotourism development
Development of eco-tourism and eco - center for
biodiversity
Valorization of goods from covered area (food,
organic production, health and spa tourism, eco
tourism and recreation tourism...)
Large parts of the covered area present the base
for the production of organic food
Installation of adequate utility infrastructure
Construction of collector for sewage water
processing
Construction of mini recycling centers
Online monitoring of air - set up stations
The introduction of biodegradable packaging in
use
Education aimed at developing environmental
awareness
Education of children through primary education
Human Resources - young trained personnel
Increasing awareness of the need to protect the
environment
The role of media in education of community
about environmental issues
211
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
National Strategy for protection of the
environment are slowly implemented
Strict penalty policy as a blow to the
local budgets
The issue of environmental protection is
not a priority
Waste management remains at the
lowest level
Slow enforcement and inadequate
funding of initiatives for the protection
of the environment
Economic development based on
unsustainable principles
Uncontrolled development of the
industry can cause intense pollution
Weak capacities of economy for
investments in environmental protection
Losing a positive image of a healthy
environment (reducing the number of
tourists, lower trade turnover of food
products)
The continuation of negative trend of
pollution - worsening of pollution
parameters (water, soil, air)
The disappearance of some plant and
animal species - the reduction of
biodiversity
Climate changes at the global level
The migration of skilled staff
Uncontrolled construction in tourist areas
and industrial plants that do not meet the
legal provisions are optional danger to
the environment
SWOT ANALYSIS ON INFRASTRUCTURE – Not included in the four priority areas
STHRENGHTS
•
Belgrade – Bar railway station runs througout
the Region
Developed basic network of local and regional
roads
Presence of the international airport Tuzla in
the neighbourhood
Good enery network covering great part of
territory
Good telecomunication network
Border crossings enables free flow of people
and goods
Valuable hydroenery potentials
E
•
R
U
•
•
Mountain-hilly configuration might slow
infrastructural projects’ implementation
Unsufficiently developed network of regional
and local roads
Limited capacities of traffic network slows flow
of people and goods
Lack of landfills for dsposal and processing of
waste materials
•
•
•
U
C
•
•
T
•
•
WEAKNESS
THREATS
R
OPPORTUNITIES
•
S
T
•
•
•
•
I
N
F
R
A
•
Construction of sewage collectors along the
river Drina River
Construction, improved maintenance and
connectionetworking of lokal and regional
roads
Improved work of border crossings in order to
provide acelerated flow of people and goods
Development and utilization of renewable
energy sources
Modernization of existing medical centers
Strengthening public-private partnerships
through joint investments of population and
local community
212
•
•
•
•
Poor transport network affects slowing of
econimic development in the Region
Lack of planning might cause slowing and
delay of infrastructural projects
Mountain-hilly configuration of the region
might be a reason for increasing costs of
infrastructural projects’ realization
Unstable political situation might have bad
impact on projects’ realization
ANNEX H:
Action plans – further details on SG proposals
213
Annex H: Action plans – further details on SG proposals
1. Tourism
2. Rural Development and Agriculture
3. SME and Entrepreneurship
4. Environmental Protection
214
TOURISM
Project 1
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Sectoral objective(s):
Creating income and employment opportunity in
Drina Tara Region
Encancing regional tourism offer in Drina Tara region
1.
Name of the project: Capacity building of three Regional Tourism Organizations(RTOs) in Drina Tara Region
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
The principal function of the RTOs is to promote and market tourism for the regional area. The existing three RTOs
Regional tourism Organization of Western Serbia, Regional Tourism Organization Bjelasica Komovi and Tourist InterRegional Drina Association- TIDA are on different development levels and experience sharing would be interesting for
each one. The RTOs operates on a very small budget of roughly RSD1.5million (€16,000) that, whilst insufficient for
purpose, is nevertheless a step in the right direction. It is important that RTOWS begins to take on more tourism product
and improvement functions that involve a more cooperative municipality approach. The organizations relies on funding
from the participating municipalities to promote and market tourism for the regional area.
However, the RTOs budget of roughly RSD1.5million needs to be greatly expanded in order for it to undertake more
effective regional tourism roles. Thus, it is important that RTOs begins to take on more tourism product and
improvement functions that involve a more cooperative municipality approach.
The RTOs should expand its activities in order to strengthen its regional marketing functions and to develop a product
improvement role in the region. Once the Drina Tara tourist region is structurally developed with all its capacities in
place, they will start to create a good quality tourist product that will represent each of the countries , and gain
international promotion.
The project objectives:
Improved organizational effectiveness and efficiency of
three regional Tourism Organizations and increased
their capacities to fulfill
Sustainable interregional development partnerships.
Target group:
Expected results:
- Defined the best practice principles for
sustainable interregional tourism development
Indicators:
Municipalities allocated 20% more funds for RTOs
Joint work plan of 3 organizations developed
At least two inter regional tourism products developed
Interregional routs are in offer of at least touroperators
No of arrivals and overnights in Drina Tara region
increased for 20%
− Capacities for regional marketing improved
− Interregional cooperation established
− Tourism turnover in Drina Tara region
increased
Tourism industry actors in Drina Tara Region
The main activities:
- Providing and equipping of space
- Strengthening of human resources potentials
- Training
- The development of programme of joint work
- Creation of mechanism for sustainability
- Provide study
visits to best practice examples;
Implementation period:
The main risks:
RISKS:
- Changes of Directors
- Lack of funds from municipal budget
- Inadequate selection of job candidates
Estimated cost:
Two years
200 000EUR
215
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in): Municipalities
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Sources:
20% Municipalities in Drina tara Region
80% Donors
Regional development Agency Zlatibor
216
Project 2:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
(where the strategic objective of the programee/project
contributions?)
Increase tourism turnover and income in Drina Tara
Region.
2.
Sectoral objective(s):
(which the sectoral objective of the programme/project
contributions?)
The imrovement of existing capacities and the development
of new facilites of the spa, mountain and special interest
tourism
Name of the programme/project: Study of accommodation capacitiea in Drina tara region
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
There is a need to carry out a detailed market assessment for Drina – Tara region which would establish what the
potential demand would be for the next period for visitor accommodation, in which location and in what category of
provision. This analysis would have to look at the market segments, namely the potential demand for business, transit,
event and resort-related accommodation, for example, and how this could be met. For example, the lack of
accommodation for visitors (principally business) is a significant problem and this could be addressed through the
introduction of investment incentives and/or the identification of potential sites/buildings for accommodation. In
addition, there should be a review of the guesthouse and homestay facility provision and how this could be improved.
In addition, and as part of this study, it would be necessary to explore the possibilities for providing financial incentives
for investors, such as tax-free periods for investment, low interest loans, subsidies for heritage building conservation,
reduced government land offers and other measures which could attract good quality accommodation into the area.
Measures should also be identified for clarifying land and building ownership and obtaining consents. The study would
need to be undertaken by a tourism market specialist with particular knowledge of the hotel sector in the Drina-Tara and
Balkan region. There would also need to be financial and funding expertise on the study team.
The project objectives:
Target group:
Developed study of existing accomodation capacities
and investment potentials
Domestic and foreign investors
Domestic and foreign tourists
Accommodation providers (hotels, hostels, households...)
Ministry of economy and regional development (sector for
tourism)
Regional and local TOs
Tourism agencies
Expected results:
Accommodation facilities and their capacities and
conditions identified, mapped and rated
Developed Guide on the process of adjusting existing
capacities to tourists demand
Indicators:
Study on number and state of accommodation facilities
developed, printed in 500 pcs, and distributed to key
stakeholders
Developed investment profile for potential investors
The main activities:
- Development of project assignement
- Field research on number and state of existing
accommodation facilities
- Research on tourist market demand regarding quality
and structure of accommodation facilities
- Research on domestic and foreign investment
potentials regarding improvement of existing and
Implementation period:
12 months
217
building new accommodation facilities
The main risks:
- Public procurement procedures
- Lack of monitoring mechanisms
- Inadequately articulated tasks
- Lack of information on field/distorted
information
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
NGO Prijatelji Srebrnice
100.000 Eur
Sources:
RDA Zlatibor
218
%
Project 3:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
(where the strategic objective of the programee/project
contributions?)
Increase of tourism turnover and income
3.
Sectoral objective(s):
(which the sectoral objective of the programme/project
contributions?)
The imrovement of existing accomodation facilities of spa,
mountain and special interest tourism
Name of the programme/project: Renovation of existing accomodation capacities in rural Drina-Tara region
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
Tourism accomodation is a widely diverse sector cavering a variety of facilities. The extent of the range seems to
depend on demand and the availability of resources. For example, backpacking tourists require simple constructed
accommodation, rather than large-scale developments. On the other hand, business people require top-rated
metropolitan accomodation. Tourism expansion is certainly accompanied by the increasingly varied nature of the
demand for accomodation. Specific demand which is coming from the tourists requires renovation of existing
accommodation facilities which will become appropriate for various tourists requirements.
Target group:
The project objectives:
Domestic and foreign investors
Rehabilitation
and
renovation
of
accommodation facilities in Drina-Tara region
existing
Ministry of economy and regional development (sector for
tourism)
Regional and local TOs
Tourism agencies
Expected results:
Accommodation facilities renovated and adjusted to
tourists demand
Indicators:
8 small-enterprises rehabilitated according tourist market
requirements
Developed investment profile for potential investors in
building new accommodation capacities
The main activities:
- Mapping and listing of gray fields in accommodation
industry
- Mapping and listing of accommodation facilities
which require rehabilitation and renovation
- Assessment of tourist market requirements regarding
accommodation
- Assessment of investment potentials for domestic and
foreign investors
- Creation of investment profile
- Pilot project conducted on 8 small-enterprises
accommodation providers
The main risks:
- Ownership
- Expensive loans
- Permits, licences and administrative procedures
Implementation period:
3 years
Estimated cost:
Eur 800.000
219
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Municipalities, Local LTO
Sources:
50 %Donors
30%Governments
20% Private sector
Regional development Agency, NGO Prijatelji Srebrenice
220
Project 4:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Higher income creation in the tourism industry and
creation opf possibilities for self employment.
4.
Sectoral objective(s):
Improving competitiveness of the regional rural tourism
product, by integrating natural and cultural attractions,
regional festivals with activities and regional specific
handicraft, food and drinks.
Name of the programme/project: Network for rural tourism development support
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
To achieve the purpose, the project engages the two target groups: individual householders and local tourism
organizations. The project activities address the problems identified by proposing in the following intervention steps:
• Rural Tourism as a Business: work to bring rural householders to a higher professional level, by providing training
on good practice in rural tourism management. Highlight the benefits of rural tourism as self employment
opportunity. A group of activities aimed at human resource development.
• Rural Tourism Product Definition: Collect and up-date information in 8 relevant locations about all the
components that define a rural tourism product. WICs will be established in the 8 locations in order to provide
accurate information for the tourists (demand side) and for householders, tourist organizations and municipalities
(supply side). Activities include procurement and information management.
• Regional Tourism Product Integration. A regional network will integrate rural tourism components into a regional
product. The network will include a wide range of stakeholders, local, regional, national and international. This
will meet tourists’ expectations and it will benefit the supply side with higher income. Activities include
information integration, partner networking and promotion.
The project objectives:
The project objective is to develop an integrated regional
rural tourism product in Drina-Tara region
Expected results:
Rural householders trained in good rural tourism
management practice
Eight Welcome and Information centres for rural
tourism development established
Network for the integration of the regional rural tourism
product established
Visibility of regional tourist products increased
The main activities:
Mapping localities for 8 WIC.
Training design and delivery activities to provide
motivation, knowledge and skills for rural householders.
Procurement activities to purchase wooden cabins
hosting WIC’s, online booking software, IT and office
equipment, minivan.
Target group:
120 householders involved in rural tourism in Drina-Tara
region
LTOs in Drina-Tara region
Indicators:
120 households attended training in legal, financial and
marketing of rural tourism in the first 4 months of the
project
120 business plans drawn in the first 5 months of the project
120 households enlist for the regional rural tourism network
8 wooden turn-key cabins purchased and equipped to host
the rural WICs in Drina-Tara region
8 operation and action plans developed for WICs to ensure
their functioning
Information Management System developed
Network operational in 10 months after the project
50 stakeholders joined in the Network
WICs linked through establishing on-line booking system
120 households registered through on-line booking system
data base
20.000 tourists/visitors used selling services of WICs per
year
5.000 tourists purchased day trips
5.000 tourists used additional services of WICs
During the 2nd semester of functioning, WICs increased the
visit for 30% than during the 1st semester
Implementation period:
18 months
221
Information technology activities and WIC organization.
WICs integration regionally, nationally and
internationally.
Network management.
The main risks:
Inconsequent participation of household owners in
training sessions.
Limited interest in some of the training topics.
Delays in opening some of the WIC’s.
Risk of fire, arson or theft for the WIC wooden cabins.
Householders’ reluctance to feed information in the
network database.
Inconsequence in updating information in the network
database.
Difficulties in technical connectivity with other
websites.
Difficulties in stakeholder collaboration.
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
e) Project idea
Estimated cost:
359.394,00 EUR
Partners(in):
LTOs in Drina-Tara region
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
TO Uzice
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Sources: Donors 80%
Local authorities 20 %
222
Project 5:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Sectoral objective(s):
Increase of tourism turnover and income
Cultural tourism introduced as an important
tourism development
5.
driver of
Name of the programme/project: Renovation of existing accomodation capacities in Drina-Tara region
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
It is important to recognize that any discussion of the inter-relationships between tourism, culture and development is
confronted by several layers of complexity. The very nature of culture entails that it is not static. Rather it evolves and
changes, and as such the multifaceted relationships it shares with tourism also change. In addition, the structures and
practices of tourism are seldom isolated from other aspects of life; rather tourism, in structural terms and as a set of
social practices, is inter-connected with all aspects of daily life. Tourism touches upon people’s connections with other
peoples, places and the past (all being highly contested terms at both the individual and collective level), and in policy
terms tourism cuts across the fields of planning, education, health, environment, transport, development and culture. The
overlaps and competing priorities have made it important to develop strong cultural tourism in Drina-Tara region as an
instrument of connecting people in cross-border area and exchange of cultural and social habits in order to decrease
differences.
The project objectives:
Target group:
Domestic and foreign tourists
Increased inter-communication in cross-border area
through development of unique cultural exchange
Ministry of economy and regional development (sector for
tourism)
Regional and local TOs
Tourism agencies
Expected results:
Indicators:
Study on cultural tourism potentials in Drina-Tara region
developed
Tourist turnover increased for 15% in Drina-Tara region
The number of visits to cultural objects
At least 5 different cultural routes developed and
promoted
The cultural tourism in Drina-Tara region recognized on
international level
The main activities:
- Mapping and listing of material and spiritual cultural
heritage
- Evaluation of tourism potentials of identified elements
of cultural heritage
- Creation of unique cultural routes in cross-border area
- Promotion of cultural tourism as a tourism form
additional to the other tourism forms
Implementation period:
The main risks:
- Inadequately articulated tasks
- Lack of information on field/distorted
information
- National regulations
Estimated cost:
1 year
Eur 380.000
223
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
Е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Local LTOs
Cultural organizations
Sources:
50 % Donors
30% Governments
20% Cultural institutions
RDA Zlatibor , NGO Prijatelji Srebrenice
224
Project 6:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Human resources development
6.
Sectoral objective(s):
Improved education facilities and training in tourism sector
Name of the programme/project: Improving education of tourism personeel by establishing training of tourism
personenel
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
Having in mind existing potentials, Drina-Tara Region should be focused on tourism development as a source of
economic development, increased income, creation of new jobs and other socio-economic benefits for entire Region. In
order to improve existing offer, and to meet market demands as well, there is a need for interventions related to human
resources. It is necessary to improve skills of present staff engaged in tourism sector according to the up-to-date
requirements and trends. Also, young people educated in tourism doesn't receive necessary knowledge through formal
education system, and their skills have to be adjusted to tourist demands. In this respect, the overall training needs in the
tourism sector have to be assesed in detail, which could provide information about qualitative and quantitative needs for
training and education in this sector.
The project objectives:
Improved offer and quality of services in tourism
sector
Target group:
Employers, employees, unemployed, private sector
Expected results:
- Improved skills of tourism staff
- Increased quality of provided services
- Increased number of tourists
Indicators:
- Number of trained staff
- Number of satisfied tourists
The main activities:
- Assement of present training needs
- Engaging adequate traininrs according needs
- Organization of trainings
- Assesment of tourist satisfaction with services
Implementation period:
12 months
The main risks:
- Lack of verification system
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Local Tourists Organizations
National Employment Service
100.000 EUR
Sources: 80% donors
20% National Governments
Regional Development Agency Zlatibor Uzice, NGO
Prijatelji Srebrnice
Private sector
225
Project 7:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
(where the strategic objective of the programee/project
contributions?)
Sectoral objective(s):
(which the sectoral objective of the programme/project
contributions?)
Intensive tourism and local economy development
7.
Increased capacities and improved accomodation facilities
Name of the programme/project: Construction of accomodation facilities in eco areas for special interest
tourism development
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
Special interest tourism becomes very popoular among people living in urban areas, who wants to experience nature
and rest in a completely relaxing and different environment. Natural wealth and geographical diversity of Drina-Tara
Region provides great possibilities for developing different aspects of special interest tourism. In order to develop and
improve offer it is necessary to provide appropriate accomodation and other following facilities, required by visitors.
The project objectives:
To create conditions necessary for development of
special interest tourism
Target group:
Investors , tourists, rural population
Expected results:
- Increased possibilities for local population to
generate income by providing services for
tourists
- Reduced migration of local population
Indicators:
- Number of visitors
- Reduced migration
The main activities:
- Mapping potential sites and assesment of
investment potentials
- Prioritization of potential sites
- Developing investment profile for investors
- Establishment of a Fund to encourage
investments
Implementation period:
The main risks:
Property issues
Expensive bank loans
Other procedures for obtaining permits
Migrations
Poor infrastructure-inaccessible sites
Lack of legislation in rural tourism in the
Federation
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Tourism organization, RDA, NGO Prijatelji Srebrnice
24 months
2 milion EUR
Sources:
Donors
Municipalities - 20%
Governments- 20%
Private sector- 30%
Local municipalities
226
30
%
Project 8:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Increased turnover and income from tourism
industry in Drina Tara Region
Sectoral objective(s):
(which the sectoral objective of the programme/project
contributions?)
Improvement of marketing and promotion of tourist
destination in Drina Tara region
8.
Name of the programme/project: Marketing plan for Drina Tara region
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
However, in order to maximize the future benefits of their attractiveness it is necessary to establish what these areas
have to offer, especially in relation to competing destinations in the Balkan area and in Central Europe, and the potential
visitor markets. Furthermore, a marketing strategy or development of a marketing plan cannot proceed without a clear
understanding of the tourism products available since it will be these for which demand is sought
through any campaign undertaken. Similarly, any product development planning must take into account what the market
wants and to be in line with market expectations.
Products and markets are mirror images of each other. Thus, attractions or destinations need to be market-tested and
assessed in terms of their offer in the face of competing destinations. The attractiveness of the Drina-Tara Region
should be considered in terms of the following: primary attractions that
draw significant numbers of visitors in their own right, clusters or groupings of attractions, circuits that are often
themed, for example religious attractions that link monasteries and churches together; and key events that may include
sporting or cultural gatherings. These factors need to be considered in conjunction with the brand image for the Region,
existing marketing campaigns and the quality of facilities provided (accommodation, restaurants, utilities and road
access).
Destination marketing builds on initial market perceptions, creating and strengthening the market image and developing
expectations among the target market segments.
Unless prospective visitors have a positive impression of a destination with expectations that they will find interesting
and enjoyable things to see and do, they are unlikely to choose to visit. Whilst positive ‘word of mouth’
recommendations following a visit (to friends, family and colleagues) is a highly cost-effective form of
marketing for the destination, this is not likely to be a firm basis for an area to develop into a major visitor destination.
Thus, with a substantive and well-targeted marketing and communications campaign, a destination could achieve much
greater visitor volumes for its existing tourism attractions and facilities without eroding the goodwill felt by those
coming to the area.
Of course, as demand grows so the range and capacity of the tourism product will also need to grow. Whilst a concerted
and coordinated marketing and promotional campaign may be required that highlights a few major attractions, which
would be supported by a diverse range of sites, facilities, activities and circuits throughout the
area, it is likely that private sector operators and other organisations will probably also undertake their own individual
promotional activity. Not with standing this, all activities should follow, and be based on, an overall strategic marketing
and tourism development approach.
The project objectives:
Enhancing recognisability of tourism destinations in
the Drina Tara region.
Target group:
Domestic and foreign tourists
Regional and local TOs
Тourism service providers
Expected results:
Created image (branding) of Drina –Tara region.
Designed web presentation of the Region.
Defined target markets/groups.
Made marketing plan of priority products.
The main activities:
Creating image (branding) of Drina –Tara region:
- The developmet of Terms of Reference of the
project
Indicators:
Created travel programs which includes tourism destinations
in the Drina Tara region .
Increased availability of information on tourism destinations
in the Drina Tara region to tourists.
Increased number of tourists in tourism destinations in the
Drina Tara region.
Implementation period:
19 mounths
227
Introduction of Online booking system
Creation of virtual presentations of tourism
sites
- Market research
- Exibitions in fairs.
Designing web presentation of the Region.
Defining target markets/groups.
Marketing plan of priority products.
-
The main risks:
- lack of cooperation between regional tourism
organizations
- Insufficient funds for marketing activities
- Deviation from the planned activities
- Breaking the time frames
Estimated cost: 520.000,00 eura
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Local TOs, Regional Tos, Municipalities
Sources:
80 % Donors, 20% Municipalities
Zlatibor Regional Development Agency,. NGO prijatelji
Srebrnice
228
Project 9:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
(where the strategic objective of the programee/project
contributions?)
Intensive tourism and local economy development
9.
Sectoral objective(s):
(which the sectoral objective of the programme/project
contributions?)
Increased capacities and improved accomodation facilities
Name of the programme/project: Construction of accomodation facilities in eco areas for special interest
tourism development
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
Special interest tourism becomes very popoular among people living in urban areas, who wants to experience nature and
rest in a completely relaxing and different environment. Natural wealth and geographical diversity of Drina-Tara Region
provides great possibilities for developing different aspects of special interest tourism. In order to develop and improve
offer it is necessary to provide appropriate accomodation and other following facilities, required by visitors.
The project objectives:
To create conditions necessary for development of
special interest tourism
Target group:
Investors , tourists, rural population
Expected results:
- Increased possibilities for local population to
generate income by providing services for
tourists
- Reduced migration of local population
Indicators:
- Number of visitors
- Reduced migration
The main activities:
- Mapping potential sites and assesment of
investment potentials
- Prioritization of potential sites
- Developing investment profile for investors
- Establishment of a Fund to encourage
investments
-
Implementation period:
The main risks:
Property issues
Expensive bank loans
Other procedures for obtaining permits
Migrations
Poor infrastructure-inaccessible sites
Lack of legislation in rural tourism in the
Federation
Estimated cost:
24 months
2 milion EUR
229
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
ц) Technical documentation and cost analysis
д) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Tourism Associations
Sources:
%
Municipalities - LTOs, private investors
Local Tourist Organizations from Drina-Tara Region
230
Project 10:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Increasing of incomes from tourism by increasing
visibility of region tourist products
Sectoral objective(s):
To make tourism offer transparent and to help visitors in
orientation in Drina-Tara region
Name of the programme/project: Setting up adequate tourism signalisation
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
Directional signage to visitor attractions is inadequate throughout Drina-Tara region. There are some directional signs in
the standard brown tourism format, but they are few and far between and many are indistinctive and of an impromptu
nature. Some municipalities, however, do seem to have implemented a tourism signage system to destinations.
Nevertheless, comprehensive signage is needed throughout the area. This project would identify the attractions that
would need signage, from what locations and the design of the signs.
The project objectives:
The main objective of tourism signage is to achieve a
balance between assisting visitors, minimizing
environmental intrusion and maintaining safety
Target group:
Visitors of Tara-Drina region
LTOs in Drina-Tara region
Tourism service providers
Expected results:
Regional tourist information centre established
Signs for accommodation and restaurants set up
Signs for tourism attractions and locations set up
Regional info tables/billboards and maps set up on “hot
spots”
Increased visits of transit tourists to local attractions
Indicators:
Increased visibility of tourism offer
Increased awareness of region tourism potentials
Increased number of tourist arrivals
Easier orientation of visitors
The main activities:
An assessment of the existing tourism signage situation.
Determining what key attractions need to have
directional signage and from what road types (primary,
regional and local).
Prioritization of sites (in accordance with the
development programme).
Choosing a visual identity for the labelling of each
product (localities).
Making of project/technical documentation and
providing licenses.
Setting up signalisation.
Implementation period:
2, 3 years
The main risks:
Permissions, jurisdiction
Property issues
Unsystematic prioritization
Estimated cost:
400.000 – 600.000 EUR
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
e) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Sources: Donors 50%
MERR 40%
Local authorities 10 %
Partners(in):
Local self-governments and local tourism organizations
in Drina-Tara region
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and
evalution:
Tourism Organization of West Serbia
231
RURAL DEVELOPMENT:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
Sectoral objective(s):
Development and improvement of local capacities for
payable economic and sustainable rural development.
1. Name of the programme/project: Together in Action for Sustainable Rural Development
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
Drina-Tara Region covers the territory of 3 countries and consists of 13 local communities, which are different in
economical development and position within their countries (Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina). Besides
the obvious difference these local communities have much in common. Geographically they exist alongside the Drina
River and the Tara mountain. All local communities gravitate in the border areas of their states and they are distant
from their administrative centres and in the transition period have undergone economic decline. In order to catch up with
new trends of development, local communities have developed their own strategic documents and all of them
recognized rural development and agriculture as a main priority and development opportunities. Decision makers and
other important local actors are aware that one of the chances of development is regional and inter-regional connectivity
for mergers of existing resources and gaining new ones. Common priority of rural development is a topic that needs a
planned approach to ensure consistent work over the long term.
All three countries have signed bilateral agreements on cooperation in various fields. Institutional cooperation at the
regional level includes:
•
to draft and adopt at the local level joint strategy for rural development in this region that does not exist now;
•
to create a regional inter-state council to take care and plan implementation strategies for a longer period of
time
•
to establish centres for education and support rural development in the administrative centres of these small
regions (north of Montenegro, Western Serbia, Eastern Bosnia). Local communities have recognized rural
development as a priority and to develop opportunities while they do not have developed awareness and
knowledge of what rural development means (It is not just agriculture and export of raw material)
•
Decision-makers at the local level didn’t use enough mentioned opportunities, what caused a lack of quality
regional projects. So in all three countries there is no capacity for quality access to available funds from the
EU.
Proponents of the project believe that implementation of activities and achieved results will enable and contribute to
future decentralization and regionally responsive to the needs and challenges in local communities.
The project objectives:
Target group:
Created
institutional conditions for joint
development of rural community potentials of 13
local communities in Drina-Tara region
Built regional capacity for planned approach and
better absorption of available financial resources for
rural development.
Decision-makers at the local level
Media
Unemployed youth leaders
Raised local capacity for promotion and acquisition
of new knowledge in the field of sustainable rural
development
Expected results:
Adopt Regional Strategy for Rural Development
Establish Regional Council for Rural Development
Establish three centres for education and support of
rural development
232
Indicators:
Develop and published Strategy
Choose 13 local communities on adopting a proposed
strategy
Establish a Regional Council as a nomination of
members of Regional Councils
Decide on the establishment of Training Centres
The main activities:
Preparatory activities
The consultative process for the preparation of
regional strategies for sustainable rural development
Foundation of a regional advisory body for rural
development
Foundation of three centres for education and
support for rural development
Implementation period:
The main risks:
Insufficient local capacities
Political instability - Elections
The project team - inconsistent expectations
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
18 months
180 000 euro
Sources:
Government ministries of Serbia, Bosnia, Montenegro 10%
Local government 10%
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evaluation:
Partners in Montenegro - Centre for Agriculture
development in Bijelo Polje, local authorities from all
three countries covered by the programme, Ministry of
Agriculture of BiH, Faculty of Economy in Montenegro,
Ministry of Agriculture, Trade and water management in
Serbia, Agency for Rural Development
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
Association: Centre for Human Rights and Democracy
Sectoral objective(s):
Building regional and local capacities and preserve natural
resources for rural tourism
2. Name of the project: Rural tourism as a development opportunity of the Drina Tara Region
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
Local communities in the Drina - Tara region have a natural potential for developing rural tourism which differs from
currently existing major tourist centers (Zlatibor, Tara, Mokra Gora, Visegrad SPA etc. This would attract more visitors
from the region and the EU. Current challenges in the region are:
There is not enough accommodation capacities offering rural contents.
Existing capacities are not sufficiently promoted in quality, and that causes inadequate utilization.
Lack of joint regional offers which could be offered on the market.
Lack of knowledge and experts who would deal with improving offers and the quality of rural tourism
Perceived challenges could be overcome by starting a process that would have 4 phases:
Mapping needs and recognition of rural tourism as a development opportunity of the Drina Tara Region
Promotion of best practices examples from leading European countries
The modernization of rural tourism services
Continual education of local actors
Whole the process will be implemented over a long period and the main result will be an expansion of rural tourism and
economic development of the region
The project objectives:
• Mapping needs and the recognition of rural
tourism as a development opportunity of the
Drina Tara Region
• Promotion of best practices examples from
leading European countries
233
Target group:
Service providers in rural tourism
Local producers
Tourists
•
•
The modernization of rural tourism services
Continual education of local actors
Expected results:
Educate at least 200 service providers
50 representatives of local government involved in the
process
Map offers and existing capacities
Create a unique guide and database
Indicators:
The main indicator is the number of overnight stays in the
region
Defined rules for domestic products promotion and a code
of conduct
The main activities:
Evidence of accommodation capacities in the region
(an electronic database, printed guide of the region’s
offer)
Mapping rural households
Training legal entities, associations, market
analysis, accommodation and food standards
Defining the local traditional offer
Defining the rules of conduct and local products
promotion
Study cases with a visit to Italy and Slovenia
Implementation period:
The main risks:
Different expectations of stakeholders in the project
The who do not follow the rules
Those who give up on the education process
Political changes at local level
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Sources:
Donors 80 %
Local government 10 %
Ministry 10 %
Partners(in):
Tourist organizations of all local governments
Local governments
NGOs
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evaluation:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Sectoral objective(s):
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
Develop and improve cooperation in the promotion process
and raise the visibility of tourist potential in the Drina Tara
Region
24 mounts
240.000 €
RDA Zlatibor
3. Name of the programme/project: Place the Drina Tara Region on the European map
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
The Drina Tara Region is recognized on national level, surrounding countries and in European countries like a
destination as a potential attraction to visitors: natural resources, cultural-historic heritage, multi-cultural values,
traditional products which characterize this Region. Local communities from this Region have numerous destinations to
explore which could be more visible and available for a greater number of tourists from all around the world. Local
community representatives recognized the need of a joint appearance with unique offers on European tourist market. At
the moment, there isn’t a joint plan, neither the product which could be offered in a manner to use the potential
resources for developing different types of tourism which is based on local products and attractions. For the mentioned
reasons, the Region’s position isn’t marked on the map of European tourist events.
234
By implementation of the Project, proposers would like to make preconditions for increasing tourist visits to local
communities of the Drina Tara Region during the whole year. Regional strategy for this position on the European
market should be developed during this project. Different activities will be performed in order to promote existing
events on local and regional level. That will, in short time, promote and provide an adequate position of existing events
on the map of European tourism.
The project objectives:
Target group:
Promote existing tourist offers in the Drina Tara Region
Local
self
government
representatives,
embassy
representatives in three countries, the European tourist,
tourism staff in the Drina Tara Region
Creating a strategic frame for a successful position of the
Drina Tara Region in the European event map
Informing the European tourist about local options in the
Drina Tara Region
Exchange of knowledge and experience with similar
European regions
Expected results:
Indicators:
Regional strategy adopted by Assemblies of three local
self government
Decisions of local self governments on adopting a regional
strategy
Joint website operational
Number of visitors to the joint website
Established and appointed regional body for promotion
A decision on establishing a Regional body adopted
Create and broadcast 9 TV series
Number of TV-shows broadcast and TV-stations which
cover it
Study tour to Spain realized
Number of study tour participants and the success of the
study tour to Spain
Local events presented abroad
Number of embassies participated at the presentation of the
Region
The main activities:
Implementation period:
Preparation activities
18 months
Creation of a joint promotion strategy in the EU
Joint Regional website
List of local events
Study tour to Spain
Memorandum of cooperation on a regional level
Promotional activities, TV series, printing materials in
Serbian, Spanish and English language, presentation of
regional events to representatives of foreign embassies
The main risks:
Low interest
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evalution:
300.000 Euro
Sources:
Donors 90%
Local self government 10%
235
RDA, TO from Region, Tourist center Bajina Bašta,
NGO’s, local self government
Civil society association
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
Sectoral objective(s):
Preservation and promotion of traditional products
4. Name of the programme/project: Preservation of indigenous varieties of fruit
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
In the Region of the Drina-Tara there are a large number of registered agricultural households and an established
tradition in the production of fruit, vegetables, honey, dairy and meat products according to the old domestic recipes.
Besides the large production of different varieties of fruit (raspberries, plums, apples, blackberries...), most of the
households also have the old indigenous varieties of fruit. Taking into mind the tendency and orientation toward large
production, agricultural producers show less interest for indigenous varieties of fruit. Besides that, there is plenty of
forestry fruit-strawberries and blueberries in these areas whose gathering is uncontrolled and there is a real danger of
their disappearance.
As the Region tends to develop rural potentials and to be promoted in the world uniquely, it is necessary to preserve the
old variety of fruit and include indigenous varieties and their processed products in the Region.
The project proposals consider that there are two parallel directions of operation:
1. stimulate fruit producers and producers of nurseries to grow indigenous varieties of fruit
2. raising the awareness of local governments, citizens and buyers of forest fruits that there are limits in harvesting these
products
This will contribute to even greater offers of specific products from the Region.
The project objectives:
Target group:
Increased nursery production of indigenous varieties
of fruit
Increased production
traditional manner
and
processing
in
Fruit producers and processors, citizens and local
government
the
Develop public awareness related to the need for
limited harvesting of forest plants
Expected results:
Select at least 20 indigenous varieties for further
planting
Conduct a campaign to preserve the region’s
biodiversity
At least 50 fruit producers ready to start massive
production of indigenous varieties of fruit
Indicators:
Number of selected varieties
Number of persons who have received information
about the importance of preserving forestry plant
resources
Number of planted fruit trees
The main activities:
Prepare activities
Selection of representative samples
Identify and collect indigenous varieties of fruit in
the Region
Select fruit producers
Create reports from the field
Implementation period:
236
18 months
The main risks:
Natural disasters
Non-profitability of producers
Estimated cost:
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evaluation:
80 000 Euros
Sources:
Donors 80%
Self Producers 10%
Ministry of Agriculture 10%
Association of producers and processors of fruit,
Agricultural extension services, Fruit Research Institute
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
The tradition of
region
Agricultural extension service of Uzice
Sectoral objective(s):
fruit production in the Drina Tara
5. Name of the programme/project: Education of agriculture manufacturers and the introduction of a quality
system in agricultural production (fruits, vegetables, honey, meat and milk).
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the programme/project:
The Drina Tara region has a large number of registered agricultural households and a tradition of fruit, vegetables and
honey products, manufacture of milk and meat by the old traditional recipes. Most of the registered agricultural
households have production capacity for subsistence and a small segment of production they place on the market. A
small percentage of them place a large percentage of these products on the market. The market is very demanding and
the disposal of products is difficult because there is no useful quality system for agricultural production because of a
lack of knowledge and information of farmers. There is no awareness that investments in continual education pays off
many times in a different manner, and that effects what could be perceived in a very short time both on a personal and
social level. The lack of knowledge and a quality system in agricultural production will completely detract farmers from
the region to place their products on the available markets of neighbouring and EU countries.
Target group:
The project objectives:
To raise the knowledge of manufacturers about the
importance of introducing a unique quality system
in production by the education and dissemination of
good practice examples from the EU.
To create conditions for the implementation of
quality systems in 15 pilot agriculture households.
Direct target group - 90 owners of agricultural households
from the Tara Drina region; 60 members of 15 pilot
agricultural households
Indirect target group - 6000 people from the Drina Tara
region
To inform the public about the importance of
introducing standards in agriculture by media
promotion
Expected results:
Indicators:
Raise the knowledge of 90 owners of agricultural
households about the importance of introducing a
unique quality system in manufacturing.
237
Number of participants in activities
Number of quality implemented activities
Create conditions for introducing and implementing
quality systems on 15 agricultural households
Inform 6000 persons from the region about the
unique quality system and its implementation in
agricultural production
Production quality on households
The quality of information and influence on other
agriculture manufacturers
The main activities:
Implementation period:
Preparation activities
15 months
Education
Promotional and educational materials
The process of implementation of quality systems in 15
selected households
Promotion of good practice examples from EU
Estimated cost:
The main risks:
180 000 EUR
Poor communication with science institutions and
other professional organizations
The timeframe for implementation is not in
accordance with the free time of the target groups activities at the time of agricultural work
Inconsistency of low regulation of States of the
Drina Tara region
Inconsistency in standard implementation by
producers
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in): Citizen association, Professional
organization, Local governments
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evolution:
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Sectoral objective(s):
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
Protection and promotion of traditional products made of
milk, meat, fruit and honey
Sources:
%
Agricultural extension service
6. Name of the program/project: From our field to the European table
238
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the program/project:
There is a large number of registered agricultural households in the Drina – Tara Region, as well as traditional
production of fruits, vegetables, honey, meat and milk products made according to the old traditional recipe. The
following challenges are required in all targeted local communities:
No one takes any action in regard to branding traditional products and protection of geographical origin, which is the
consequence of a lack of information and the ignorance of local movers.
The educational system doesn’t treat education of adults sufficiently, and the institutions for producer development
doesn’t exist
Capacities for processing agricultural products are insufficient, archaic and unavailable for producers
Networking between those in a valued list doesn’t exist, and associating and clustering is also at a very low level
As a consequence of the described situation, products made in this region are weakly placed on the EU market and very
often there is unhealthy food on the market.
This project will be implemented in 2 phases:
1.
Construction of the necessary infrastructure for the production of healthy safe food
2.
Distribution of products on the EU market
The project objectives:
Target group:
Increase the competitiveness of agricultural products by
building local capacities for the production of healthy
safe food
Agricultural producers and processors, population and local
self governments
Increase the placement of traditional products with a
geographical origin on the EU market
Expected results:
Network the value of the active persons list
Educate at least 500 individuals
Map existing problems and joint solutions defined
Promote products - local brands, smoked ham, sweets,
blackberry vine etc
Develop a study of collecting workstations
Opened 6 collecting workstations
Indicators:
Number individuals who attended the training
Number the new associations
Number the recognized and initiated joint movers
Number those who opened and collected workstations
The main activities:
Preparation activities
Mapping producers
Education – healthy soil, an integral approach in plant
protection, critical points in technology, harvest
Creating a database of purchaser and producers
Developing a study of cooler workstations
Setting up pilot workstations
Implementation period:
24 months
Estimated cost:
The main risks:
Lack of networking and poor communication in
production and processing
Lack of applying newly acquired knowledge
Property relations unsettled in places where pilot
workstations are planned
Poor cooperation between buyers and producers
Lack of associations and co-operatives
240.000 EUR
239
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive pre-feasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposals
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evaluation:
Sources:
Donors
Producers:
80 %
10 %
Ministry of agriculture: 10 %
Association of fruit producers and processors,
Agricultural extension services, Fruit-growing Institute,
economic entities from the Drina-Tara Region
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
Association of cold-storages Ljubovija
Blueberry Association Bajina Basta
Agricultural extension service Uzice
Regional Chamber of Commerce
Sectoral objective(s):
Connect products in the region aiming toward a common
style of appearance on the market
7. Name of the program/project: Improvement of the current methods of production and processing of
agricultural products(fruit, vegetables, honey, meat and dairy products)
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of the program/project:
The Drina-Tara region has a large number of subjects, which are engaged in production and distribution of agricultural
products. The chain of production includes agricultural producers, distributors of seed, preparation for protection and
nutrition, packaging distributors, transporters, collectors etc. Cooperation between them and the degree of
implementation of innovative agro-technical measures is low. Therefore, level of yields and commercial benefit per
hectare of plough land is low. Applying agro-technical protective measures is on a low level and in 90% of cases wrong.
In the process of primary production of agricultural products applied agro-technical protection measures are
inconsistent. On the market one can find preparation which is forbidden by the law. Consequences of this attitude, is that
contracted export businesses are failing, because the final products can’t meet basic quality requirements. Controlled
products contains substance which are not allowed or they are present in amounts which are not allowed. It is necessary
to conduct permanent education of all mentioned market players and create a system for monitoring the application and
innovation of agro-technical measures. So the competition of agricultural products will be increased on domestic and
foreign markets, and also economic benefits for individuals and societies will be increased.
The project objectives:
Target group:
- Introduce agricultural producers from 10 municipalities
of the Drina Tara region with innovation in the
implementation of agro-technical measures.
200 entrepreneurs, 10 local governments, 20 owners of
agricultural pharmacies
- Increase the level of knowledge among agricultural
producers about the innovation in implementing agrotechnical measures.
- Create conditions for monitoring the implementation of
agro-technical innovations on the territory of 10
municipalities in Drina-Tara region.
240
Expected results:
- Agricultural producers are introduced with innovations
in the implementation of agro-technical measures.
- Increase the level of knowledge in the implementation
of agro-technical innovations.
- Created conditions for monitoring the implementation
of agro-technical innovations.
The main activities:
Indicators:
- Number of persons which are introduced with agrotechnical innovations in all three countries
- Number of people attended education training
- Database of economic entities and primary producers
- A common service for the monitoring of innovations and
their implementation
Implementation period:
- Preparatory activities
- Presentation of innovations in implementing agrotechnical measures.
- Mapping economic entities and primary producers
- Education related to innovations and the
implementation of production and the processing of
agricultural products.
- Establishing a common service for the monitoring and
implementation of innovation.
The main risks:
- 24 months
Estimated cost:
300.000 euro
- Availability of new technologies.
- Lack of interest of producers.
- Low market.
- Competition from within the neighborhood
The status of readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/implementation/monitoring and evaluation:
- Association of citizens, the vocational organization
from agriculture
- Working groups in Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and
Herzegovina
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE :
Sectoral objective(s):
Regional cooperation and networking for sustainable
rural development
The development and improvement of cooperation in the
process of promotion and increasing the visibility of rural
resources in the Drina Tara region
Sources:
- Donors 90%
- Local government 10%
8. Name of the programme/project: Promotion of the Drina Tara region
241
Justification (problem and solution) and a brief description of thr programme/project:
The Drina - Tara Region has been recognized at state level in the neighbouring and in European countries as a
destination that has something to show and offer to visitors, starting from natural wealth, cultural and historical heritage,
wealth of multicultural values and traditional products that characterize this region. Local communities in this region
have a number of events and destinations that may become visible and accessible to a larger number of tourists from
around the world. Currently there is no clear and precise plan for greater promotion of the region on the market. Also,
there are sufficient funds to consolidate existing resources and share presents. Due to a lack of cooperation and lack of
communication between key stakeholders there is a favorable regional environment for potential investors in tourism
development. There is no common regional event or events, nor a recognizable tourist route that would allow tourists to
visit all major destinations in this region within 7 days.
By implementing this project, proposers would like to create the conditions for greater investment in rural tourism,
develop marketing activities for the promotion of existing destinations, and design joint appearances in front of investors
and consumers of rural tourism in the Drina Tara region.
The project objectives:
Target group:
Increase visibility to investors and tourist access to the
Drina Tara region
Potential donors, representatives of local tourism
organizations, representatives of local governments
Increase the level of cooperation of local stakeholders in
defining the common tourism product
Indirect target groups - tourists from the region
Promotion of public and private partnership in creating
opportunities for regional development
Expected results:
Indicators:
Build a marketing plan for the Drina Tara region
The quality and visibility of the marketing plan
Produce and present investment maps for the potential
of the region
The number of investors who are familiar with the potential
of the regional map
Define and promote 7 day tourist routes
The number of included agencies which offer 7 day tourist
routes in the Drina Tara region
Complete a donor conference
The number of satisfied visitors with a joint stand at the fair
The joint appearance at the fair of rural tourism
The main activities:
Implementation period:
24 months
Preparatory activities
Development of a Marketing Plan of the region
Mapping the investment potential of the region
Creating a brochure for investors
Defining common regional events
A joint appearance at donor conferences
A joint appearance at rural tourism fairs
The main risks:
Estimated cost:
200 000 euros
Different legislation
Agreement of local governments related to joint
performance plans
242
The status of the readiness of the project:
а) Ready for implementation
b) Positive prefeasibility studies
c) Technical documentation and cost analysis
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources of financing/co-financing:
Partners(in):
Leading project/ implementation/monitoring and evalution:
RDA Zlatibor, tourist centers and organizations (Bajina
Basta), local governments
Working bodies in Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and
Hercegovina
Sources:
243
Donors 80
%
Local governments 20%
SME AND ENTREPENEURSHIP
Strategic objective:
Sector objective:
To contribute sustainable economic development
through export oriented SME in the Drina – Tara
Region
To increase SME competence level MSP-a in the DrinaTara region through support to quality standards.
1. Name of project/program: Advisory and financial support to SME sector to enforce quality standards
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
The current situation in the SME sector and it’s improvement depends on product placement on EU markets and other
foreign markets. Entrepreneurs in the region recognized a need for certification with relevant EU standards, HACCP and
ISO standards. Due to production growth and increase in exports it is necessary to serve financial and advisory support
at quality standards
Target group
Overall project objectives:
To increase the chances for SME development in the
Drina – Tara Region through advisory and financial
support
Current SME in the Drina-Tara Region
Expected results:
Indicators :
1.
Provide advisory support to enforce quality
standards.
2.
Enforce standards (ISO, HACCP) in specified
number of SME in the Drina-Tara Region
1.
Provide advisory support
2.
Enforce standards
Implementation period
Main activities:
Duration of project: 12 months
1.
Identify SME / project beneficiaries
2.
Establish the needs of SME/project
beneficiaries
3.
Provide advisory support to SME in order to
enforce standards
4.
Select SME for certification of quality
standards
5.
Certify specified SME
Main risks:
1. SME indifference
2. Unavailability of standard enforcement in SME
3. Unprepared SME for financing the certification
process
Specified costs :
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources:
244
200.000 EUR
Donators
80 %
Local government
10 %
SME
10 %
Partners
Commercial boards
Agriculture and development ministries
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
Agencies for SME development
NGOs/ Entrepreneurs Association/ Development Agencies
245
Strategic objective :
Sector objective :
To contribute to economic sustainable development
through support to the growth of the current SME in
the Drina – Tara Region
To improve conditions for the placement of goods and
services from the Drina-Tara Region on the EU market
2. Name of project/ program: Study tours and SME promotion in the EU
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Lack of new markets, difficulties comparing markets, technologies, trends and a low level of production are basic
problems in the SME development sector in the Drina – Tara Region. For growth and development of current SME it is
necessary to support initiatives for these companies to represent their products and services at international trade fairs in
the EU. Trade fairs are a significant opportunity for the SME, for cooperation with companies from the EU as well as a
chance to realize specific business ideas. Besides, visits to EU companies provide this Region’s SME managers more
experiences, to realize new business practices and develop contacts. Finally, a local department of production can also
work for an EU company.
Overall project objectives;
Target group:
To increase the level of services and the placement of
goods in the EU. To use new methods of support to
current SME for education and promotion in EU markets
Current SME from the Drina-Tara Region
Expected results:
Indicators :
3.
4.
SME representatives from this Region with
new knowledge, experiences and contacts with
EU companies
3.
Study tours and visits to trade fairs
4.
Established cooperation between regional SME and
EU based SME
Increased SME placements from the Region on
EU markets
Main activities:
6.
Identify SME/program beneficiaries
7.
SME selection for visits to the EU
8.
Establish a cooperation for state representatives
9.
Realize study tours
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months
10. Organize trade fairs in the EU according to the
needs of the SME in the Drina Tara Region
Main risks:
Specified costs:
SME indifference for participation in the program
100.000 EUR
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study on prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/co- financing sources:
Donators
80 %
Local government
14 %
SME
246
5%
Partners
Commercial boards
Agriculture and development ministries
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
Agencies for SME development
NGOs/Development Agencies
247
Strategic objective :
Sector objective :
To contribute to sustainable economic development
through support to develop START-UP and current
businesses in the Drina-Tara Region
To improve self-employment conditions by
employing staff in current SME in the Drina –
Tara Region
3. Name of project/program: Pre-qualification and additional education of the unemployed according to the needs of
businesses of the SME in the Drina – Tara Region
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
The Drina-Tara Region has a high unemployment rate mainly because of a poor level of economic activity. The
education and knowledge of the unemployed in SME sectors doesn’t fit the requirements to potentially own businesses.
This project aims to reduce the gap between the needs of the SME and the personal skills of unemployed persons. They
need to identify with the current SMEs as potential employers in the Drina-Tara Region according to the research
analysis for START-UP businesses. There is a need for cooperation with other institutions who will organize relevant
education and training for the unemployed. The aim is to boost the staff numbers, employment rate, the number of
medium and small time entrepreneurs.
Target group :
Overall project objectives:
1.
To match the needs of the current SME with
knowledge of unemployment
2.
To provide professional education for potential
entrepreneurs according to the needs of their
businesses
Expected results:
1.
Educate and train the unemployed according to
the needs of Drina-Tara region
2.
Educated and train potential entrepreneurs
Main activities:
1.
Analysis of work staff and their needs
2.
Identification of potential entrepreneurs and
needs for professional education
3.
Identification of market trends and SME needs
in the Region
4.
Maintenance of program training in accordance
with identified needs, in cooperation with the
institute for adult education and other relevant
institutions
5.
Selection of an institute for education and
training
6.
Implement an educational program
7.
Award certificates
Main risks:
1.
2.
Lack of unemployed persons interested in
professional education
Unrelated program education
The unemployed, youth and sectors of society
without financial security
Indicators :
1.
Education and training reports
2.
Participant certificates
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months
Specified costs :
100.000 EUR
248
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study of pre – feasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources
European Commission: 82 %
Local government and Ministry of education: 18 %
Partners
Institute for adult education
Ministry of education
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
Agencies for SME development
NGOs
249
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
To contribute to economic sustainable development
through support to develop START-UP and current
businesses in the Drina-Tara Region
To improve self-employment conditions through the
creation of newly owned businesses by supporting
business starters and business leaders
4. Name of project/ program: Analysis of market opportunities for the creation of START-UP businesses and its
development
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
The lack of market information is one of the major problems in entrepreneur development and START-UP businesses.
The youth and unemployed are potential entrepreneurs who do not have entrepreneurial initiatives or ideas about what
businesses they can invest which provides profit to them. Also there is no necessity for the development of new
businesses focused on their needs to simultaneously provide long term opportunities for new entrepreneurs. It is well
known that the agricultural and economic sectors have a huge potential in this Region, but there isn’t adequate strategic
plans for development of these sectors based on any information system. Enforcement of markets research contributes
the quality and relevant information for the creation and development of START-UP businesses. So one has quality
decisions on the creation and investment of potential entrepreneurs
Overall project objectives:
3.
1.
To improve the informative base of potential
entrepreneurs for the planning and creation of
their own businesses
2.
To recognize specific economic sectors with
potential growth for business support
Target group:
The unemployed youth and financially vulnerable
sectors of society
To identify all failures of potential entrepreneurs.
The unemployed require education and training
Expected results:
5.
6.
Indicators :
Quality information available to potential
entrepreneurs necessary for the creation of their
own businesses
5.
Final research report
6.
Number of new entrepreneurs initiatives
Increase the number of micro firms in
agriculture and the economic sectors with
growth potential
Main activities :
11. Choose a consultant firm
Implementation period
Duration of project: 6 months
12. Create a research plan
13. Select candidates for surveys and research in
the field
14. Analysis of dates, a final report and reference
Main risks:
1.
Indifference to the questionnaire by sections of
the target groups
2.
Unrepresented stratification
Specified costs :
50.000 EUR
250
3.
Poor choice of staff for surveys and
consultation in firms
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study on prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources
Donators
83 %
Local government
17 %
Partners
Institute for adult education
Ministry of education
Agencies for SME development
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs
SMEs
251
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
To contribute to economic sustainable development
through support to develop START-UP and current
businesses in the Drina-Tara Region
To improve self-employment conditions through the
creation of newly owned business by providing optimal
financial funds
5. Name of project/ program: Guarantee credit funds
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
The development of START-UP businesses and self-employment is limited by the lack of optimal financial funds for
investment in business creation. The unemployed do not have enough financial funds to create their own businesses.
Business starters are not able to assure funds for collateral or guarantee credit funds. Bank interests are high and starters
cannot save the required level of capital. The establishment of a credit guarantee fund stimulates entrepreneur
development and creation of new firms and work places in the Drina-Tara Region
Overall project objectives :
1.
Target group:
To improve the conditions for the credit of
START-UP businesses toward low bank
interests and taking part in credit refunds in the
Region
Expected results :
7.
Optimal financial funds are available for
business finances
8.
Increase the number of micro firms and reduce
the unemployment rate through self–
employment
Main activities:
15. The maintenance of a feasibility study for the
justification of CGF formation
1.
Bureau evident unemployed in the Drina-Tara
Region
2.
The youth between the ages of 18 and 35
3.
Financially vulnerable sectors of society
Indicators :
7.
Number of guarantees
8.
The number of new entrepreneurial initiatives
9.
The number of created micro businesses
Implementation period
Duration of project: 9 months
16. Choice of partner banks
17. CGF Policies and procedures
18. CGF promotion
Main risks:
4.
Indifference of key stakeholders (banks, local
governments)
5.
Inadequate policies and procedures of the CGF
6.
Poor bank offers
Specified costs:
500.000 EUR
252
Status of project preparation:
а) The project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study of prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources
Partners
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
Banks
Local governments
Donators funds 84 %
Local government 16 %
NGOs
Employment funders
253
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
To increase competition and the level of
SME internal exchange in the Drina- Tara
Region
To contribute to economic sustainable
development through support to develop STARTUP and current businesses in the Drina-Tara
Region
6. Name of project/ program: Clustering and education of current SMEs and entrepreneurs
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Entrepreneur clustering in the Drina-Tara Region contributes to the improvement of internal exchange and
joint access to markets within the Drina – Tara Region. The formation of an Entrepreneurs Association is the
main condition for EU financing and a project goal which aims on clustering and education of current SMEs
and entrepreneurs. Generaly, entrepreneurs didnot introduce the advantages of clustering or the planning of
joint projects. These entrepreneurs need to have the necessary knowledge to manage project cycles
Overall project objectives :
Target group:
1. To increase the level of trading in the
Drina-Tara Region
1. Current SME and entrepreneurs in the DrinaTara region
2. To increase a competitive level of current
SME through clustering and joint market
access
2. Entrepreneurs associations and other business
associations
3. To establish the SME sector considering
their needs related to the attraction of EU
funds and other donator funds
Expected results :
Indicators :
3. Increase the level of trading in the DrinaTara Region
1. Level of goods exchange in the Drina-Tara
Region
4. Increase a competitive level of current
SME through clustering and joint market
access
2. Clustering and joint market access of SMEs in
the Drina – Tara region
5. Establish the SME sector to attract EU
funds and other donators funds
3. Enforced training for SME representatives in
the Drina-Tara Region
254
Main activities:
1. Collecting of dates and the maintenance of
an entrepreneurs database
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months.
2. Forming regional entrepreneurs
associations
3. Organizing conferences on trading and
opportunities for joint SME access to
markets
4. SME training for project cycle
management
5. Website content relevant to the
development of the SME sector
Main risks:
- Occasional updating of the database
-
Specified costs :
100.000 EUR
SME indifference of clustering and training
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study on prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of
expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources
Donators funds
80 %
Local government
20 %
Partners
SMEs,
Development agencies
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs
255
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
To contribute to economic sustainable To increase competition and the level of SME
development through support to develop START- internal exchange in the Drina- Tara Region
UP and current businesses in the Drina-Tara
Region
7. Name of project/ program: Clustering and education of current SMEs and entrepreneurs
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Entrepreneur clustering contributes to the improvement of internal exchange and joint access to markets
within the region. The formation of an Entrepreneurs Association is the main condition for EU financing and
a project goal which aims on clustering and education of current SMEs and entrepreneurs
Overall project objectives :
Target group:
4. To increase the level of SME trading in the
Drina-Tara Region
3. Current SME and entrepreneurs in the DrinaTara Region
5. To increase the level of competence of the
current SME through their clustering and
joint market access
4. The Entrepreneurs Association and other
business Associations
6. To establish the SME sector for EU
financing and other donator funds for
development
7.
Expected results :
Indicators :
6. Increase the level of SME trading in the
Drina-Tara Region
4. The level of SME trading in the Drina-Tara
Region
5. SME clustering and joint market access in the
Drina-Tara Region
7. Increase the competence of the current
SME through clustering and joint market
access
6. Training for SME representatives in the
Drina-Tara Region
8. Establish the SME sector for EU financing
and other kind of donator funds for
development
9.
Main activities:
6. Maintaining a database in the SME Region
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months
7. Formation of a regional entrepreneurs
association
8. Organizing a conference about trading and
joint market access
9. Training SME and entrepreneurs PCM
(project for cycle management) staff
10.
256
Main risks:
Poorly updated website
Specified costs :
100.000 EUR
SME indifference for clustering and training
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study on prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of
expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources
Donators funds
Local government
80 %
20 %
Partners
SMEs
Development agencies
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs
257
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
Progress in personal skills are vital for the youth.
There’s a need to stimulate creativity, responsibility,
team work and the ability to make decisions
To contribute to the creation of an optimal business
environment that initiates entrepreneur development
for the youth through education within regular school
programs
8. Name of project/ program: Entrepreneurship in schools
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
The low number of entrepreneurial initiatives of the unemployed can be solved with a specific education system. High
schools in the Region do not have adequate practical education that contributes to raise the awareness of
entrepreneurship to pupils. Some of the High Schools participated in the BIP project – the business innovation program
supported by the Norwegian embassy gained positive results without systemized education. We need to support the
enforcement of sustainable entrepreneur models in High schools and in cooperation with the Ministry of education. This
model should become part of the regular educational system in the region
Target group:
Overall project objectives:
1. Progress in personal skills are vital for the youth.
There’s a need to stimulate creativity, responsibility,
team work and the ability to make decisions
2.
Knowledge
and
skills
about
mechanisms and the decision process
4.
Professors and pupils of High schools in the Drina
– Tara Region
market
3.
Expected results:
Indicators :
10. Participants of seminars and workshops (list names,
pictures and reports)
1. Increase the level of pupils knowledge on
entrepreneurship, business planning and entrepreneurial
work
11. Number of newly founded entrepreneurs
2. Improve the schools capacity for enforcing new
education models
Main activities:
19. Cooperation of the project team with high
schools in the Region
12. Report of trade fairs on pupils companies
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months
20. Choose professors and pupils for the project
21. Create an informative campaign with posters,
leaflets, TV adverts, radio shows
22. Establish a pupils entrepreneurial campaign
(each professor is in charge of a specific
number of entrepreneurs)
23. Simulation of company work
24. Trade fair of pupils companies
25.
258
Main risks:
1.
2.
3.
Indifference of High school participation in
program
Passivity of professors and pupils
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study on prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Specified costs :
100.000 EUR
Financing/ co- financing sources
Donators/NGO funds
80 %
Local government
20 %
Partners
High schools
Local governments
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs
NGOs
259
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
To contribute to economic sustainable development
through the support of other direct investment in the
Drina-Tara Region
To improve conditions to attract investment in the
Drina-Tara Region
9. Name of project/ program: Maintenance of entrepreneurs infrastructure
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Business zones, technological parks and incubators represent a new concept which is recognized as an instrument of
progress in the economic development of this Region. They offer better conditions for all kinds of infrastructure and to
create a positive business environment and SME progress. It is necessary to identify all available locations for the
maintenance of entrepreneur infrastructure and current development in order to increase production level and status
employment in the Drina-Tara Region
Overall project objectives :
Target group :
To raise the level of new investment in
production through support of investors and
entrepreneurs by establishing business zones
and other entrepreneurial infrastructure
Expected results:
26. Searching market needs and the marking of
potential locations
Foreign and domestic investment
6.
Current SMEs
7.
Potential entrepreneurs
Indicators :
13. Entrepreneur infrastructure
To increase investment levels and employment
as a result of established entrepreneurs
infrastructure in the Drina-Tara Region
Main activities:
5.
14. New investment and work places
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months
27. Feasibility and justification study
28. Preparation of project documentation
29. Maintenance of entrepreneurs infrastructure
with a recommendation on feasibility study
30. Promotion
31.
Main risks :
1.
Lack of adequate localities
2.
Unsolved proper land relations
3.
Adequate promotion, investment and
entrepreneurs indifference
Specified costs :
This will depend on the feasibility study and project
documentation
4.
260
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study on prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing/ co- financing sources
Donators funds
80 %
Local government
20 %
Partners
Local governments
Cadastres
NGOs
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs
261
Strategic objective :
Sector objective:
To contribute to economic sustainable development
with support to current START UP and new SMEs in
the Drina-Tara Region
To improve the conditions for business starters in the
Drina-Tara Region
10. Name of project/ program: School for entrepreneurs
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
A major problem of this region is the high unemployment rate as a result of the war and the breakup of former
Yugoslavia. Therefore most of the economic systems are destroyed. A poor privatisation process results in high
unemployment because the public was previously employed by a larger economic system. So the SME entrepreneurs are
characterising a flexible new market trend fundamental to economic progress. There is a need to develop entrepreneur
awareness of the unemployed youth and other socially disconnected sectors. This program aims to reduce the
unemployment rate through the development of entrepreneur initiatives, education and create micro businesses in
sectors with growth potential in this Region
Overall project objectives :
4.
To increase the level of entrepreneur
awareness, the knowledge of the unemployed
youth and other socially disconnected sectors
5.
To reduce the unemployment rate by creating
of micro firms
Expected results :
9.
Target group :
The unemployed youth and other socially disconnected
sectors
Indicators :
15. Seminars and workshops (list names, pictures,
reports)
Increase the level of entrepreneur awareness,
the knowledge of the unemployed youth and
other socially disconnected sectors
16. New entrepreneurs initiatives
10. Increase the number of micro firms and the
unemployment rate through self-employment
Main activities
32. Promotion program and beneficiaries selection
17. The number of newly created micro businesses
Implementation period
Duration of project: 12 months
33. Trainers and consultant selection
34. Training programs for entrepreneurs
•
Business planning
•
Marketing and management
•
Financial and accounting services
•
Law regulation and business
registration
35. Implementation of a seminars program
36. Piloting of production and products promotion
37. Support to create and promote the five best
business ideas
262
38. Mentoring under the created firms
Main risks :
7.
Indifference of participants for seminars
8.
Poor choice of trainers and seminar programs
9.
Realisation of business ideas through micro
business creation
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study of prefeasibility
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Specified costs :
100.000 EUR
Financing/ co- financing sources
Donators funds - NGOs
80 %
Local government
20 %
Partners
Local governments
NGOs
Development Agencies
Project address, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs, Development Agencies
263
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
Project 1
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to which strategic objective?)
To maintain clean and healthy environment Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors objectives?)
Informing and connection in the are of environment protection Drina – Tara Region
Name of project/ program
Forming of project team for revision of current projects and maintenance of regional web site – all needed information
related to the environment protection (announcements , project proposals, problems)
Program justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Within project would formed team members for maintenance of new project proposals related to the environment
protection. There are also team members for revision of current projects and forming of regional site, all needed
information related to the environment protection (announcements , project proposals, problems) aiming on
improvement connection and informing specific sectors in the Drina – Tara Region.
Overall project objectives:
•
Formed project teams for maintenance new and revision of current project proposals,
Maintenance of regional site- environment protection
Target group:
Partners municipality of the Drina – Tara Region
Expected results:
1. Formed project teams
2. Done new project proposals related to the environment protection
3. Finished revision of current project proposals;
Regional site with information relevant for environment protection,
1.
Project teams;
2.
Specified number of new projects
3.
Revision report about current projects
.
Indicators :
Regional site
Main activities :
• Collecting of information in the field of priority specifying;
•
Forming project team for maintenance of new projects
•
Revision of current project
Maintenance of regional site - all needed information related to the environment protection (announcements , project
proposals, problems)
Implementation period Duration of project is from 3- 6 months
Main risks Lack of quality information & Passivity of local communities and lack of sectors interests
Specified costs 50.000 €
264
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Sources:
•
Local government 20 %
•
Donators funds 80 %
Partners
Local government, Ministries, Development Agencies, NGO, private, public and civil sectors
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and evaluation: RRA Zlatibor
265
Project 2
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To improve protection of environment and nature
To improve an integral access to the solving of ecological
resources.
problems.
Name of project/ program: Cadastre of polluters in the Drina – Tara Region
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
In the Drina-Tara, there is no sophisticated network for registering pollutants for example cadastre of pollutants (small,
medium, huge). By forming structure data base , Register of factories and kind of products as pollutants would be set up
systematic following of influence of pollutants which is dangerous for environment. That register is kind of system
which work and content is public and in every period is available to the audience and other sources (source of pollution,
level of pollution, risks of pollution). Also, sources of pollutions can be diffusive: small and medium factories,
agricultural pollutants, transport pollutants.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups:
To initiate structure data base – Cadastre of pollutants in
the Drina – Tara Region.
•
Expected results:
Related ministries,
•
Agencies for environment protection
•
Public sector ,
•
Private and civil sector
•
Industry sector
•
Agricultural producers
•
Medias
•
Audience in the Region
Indicators :
Supported Institution for cadastre forming
•
Partners group reports
•
Raised industry awareness about monitoring
and control of pollutions;
•
List of relevant institution for cadastre
•
Improved skills and knowledge of experts in
the area of monitoring and control of
pollutions;
•
Decision about establishment of pollutions Register
in the Drina – Tara Region;
•
Work results presented on workshops
•
Installed data base
•
Established information system Register;
•
Evaluation of trainings results;
•
Distributed 10.000 informative leaflets
•
Formed data base;
•
Improved moral and material responsibility of
all social actors
Main activities :
• Organizing workshops with participants of
target groups (presentation of needs for
cadastre forming)
•
Activities related for institution for cadastre
establishment
•
Activities on Software development on creation
Implementation period
Duration of project is 12months
266
of network system for pollution Register;
•
Installing of data base;
•
Staff education for Register establishment;
•
Staff education for Register establishment
(related to the relevant field- industries);
•
Public announcement of Register establishment
in the Drina – Tara Region
Main risks:
• Lack of institution interests in founding of
pollution Cadastre
Specified costs : 500.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Local government, Ministries, Development Agencies,
NGO, private, public and civil sectors
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
NGO and Agencies for environment protection
Sources:
267
•
Ministries 20 %
•
Donators funds 80 %
Project 3:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To maintain safety of environment protection.
To improve staff education and other interested sides in the
area of environment protection.
Name of project/ program: Training organization for project maintenance and cooperation with education institution
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
There is not enough number of well educated staffs for project maintenance. As a result of this activity are final and
quality project proposals together with formed members’ team (participants are representatives of the education
institution in the Drina – Tara Region). As the next activity is participation of education staffs in the trainings,
education, and workshops related to the environment protection.
Overall project objectives:
Target group :
Organized education for project maintenance in the area
of environment protection and cooperation with
education institution.
All interested sides in the Drina – Tara Region
Expected results:
Indicators :
• List of team members ( representatives of education
institutions )
•
Formed education team;
•
Organized public
stakeholders
•
Organized 10 trainings for various target
groups
•
Higher number of educated staffs in the area of
environment protection
campaign
for
interests
Main activities:
• Formation of education team;
•
Activities related to the public campaign;
•
Organizing education for project maintenance
•
Evaluation of trainings
•
Realized 3 radio shows;
•
Announcements;
•
Public announcements;
•
Evaluation list of training participants
Implementation period
Duration of project is 12months
Main risks :
• Passivity and indifference of all actors within
municipalities
Specified costs : 100.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Participation of all interested sides in the Region
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
„Prijatelji Srebrenice“ Association
Sources:
268
•
Local government 20 %
•
Donators funds 80 %
Project4:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To maintain clean and healthy environment.
Name of project/ program:
environment protection.
Contribution of infrastructure building in order to
environment protection.
Local governments are interested in project of infrastructure building in order to
Project justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
The main reason is local government interests in project ideas related to the building infrastructure. At the other side,
there is a low citizen’s interest for keeping safety of environment and lack of infrastructure which raised a level of
pollutions all components of environment: air, water, lands. Main reasons of this situation are: un - adequate access to
hard waste, bad utility infrastructure, lack of financial support, recycling centre...
Overall project objectives:
Target group:
Donators interested in financing infrastructure projects
in the area of environment protection.
Local government of Drina – Tara Region
Expected results:
Indicators :
•
Formed lists of infrastructure projects;
•
Lists of priorities of infrastructure ideas;
•
High interests in donators motivation for
donators financing in the area of environment
protection;
•
Donators conference
•
Donators funds for infrastructure projects ( World
bank)
Main activities :
• To form a list of priorities of infrastructure
ideas in cooperation with municipalities;
•
Implementation period
Duration of project: 4 years.
To organize donators conference in the Drina –
Tara Region
Specified costs : 10.000.000 €
Main risks :
• Lack of local governments interests
•
Passivity and donators indifference in
infrastructure projects
•
Lack of financial funds
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Local government, public, private I civil sectors.
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
NGOs
Sources:
269
•
Local government 20 %
•
Donators funds 80 %
Project 5:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To maintain clean and healthy environment.
To improve a system of organic food production.
Name of project/ program: Placeman market research for organic food.
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
Old fashion food production, various kind of pesticides, chemical additions resulted by land degradation.
Together
with traditional production based on organic production these effects could be reduced and protected consumers healthy.
Insufficient developed market and lack of unique data base with all needed information for that kind of production are
the main reason of creation this project proposal. These dates would make an easier access of agricultural producers and
other interested sides which are interested in organic food.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups:
To research market and opportunities for placeman of
organic food products
Agricultural producers
Expected results:
Indicators :
•
•
• Dates about market demands
Dates about market demands
Formed data base within producers and organic
products
Main activities :
• Market researches;
Collection of dates about agricultural producer
and organic products
•
Formation of unique data base and organic
products
Specified costs: 50.000 €
Main risks :
• Lack of market demands
Small producers of organic food
•
Land pollutions
Data base within producers and organic products
Implementation period:
Up 6 to 12 months
•
•
•
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Charged ministries, Association agriculture producers
NGOs
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Partners of Drina-Tara Region
Sources:
270
Project 6:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To maintain clean and healthy environment.
To improve a system of organic food production, through
trainings and seminars.
Name of project/ program: Promotion of organic food through motivation and trainings for agricultural producers.
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
The area of Drina – Tara Region is reached by agriculture lands and makes optimal conditions for organic food
production. It is necessary to stimulate agricultural producers for organic food production in order to avoid these
problems as well as various pesticides those influence on the health of citizens and environment pollution too.
Promotion of organic food production and trainings for agricultural producers would prevent of degradation land,
citizens healthy and healthy of consumers.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups:
To organize trainings and educations for agricultural
producers.
Ministries in charge,
Agricultural producers,
Final beneficiaries/ consumers of organic products
Expected results:
Indicators :
•
Promoted organic food production;
•
•
Organized 60 trainings for 400 participants –
agricultural producers in the area of 20
municipalities in the Drina Tara Region;
Distributed
brochures ;
•
Organized 60 trainings for agricultural producers
•
Trained 400 agricultural producers
•
Educated 20% of agricultural producers for organic
food
•
Educated about 20% agricultural homes as
training participants;
Main activities :
• Promotion of organic food;
• Motivation and trainings for agricultural
producers
10.000
informative-
Implementation period is 3 years.
Main activities :
• Insufficient of market
• Polluted lands;
• Lack of agricultural producers interests for
organic food
Specified costs : 500.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Charged ministries, Association agriculture producers
NGOs, Regional Development Agencies.
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Partners of Drina-Tara Region
Sources:
Ministries in charge:
Donators:
271
20%
80%
educative
Project 7:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To improve a system of organic food production.
Name of project/ program: Certification and standardization of organic food products.
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
There are huge market demands for organic products in the world because of their influence on prevention of
consumers healthy. Considering with that, production of organic food is much demanded kind of production
(quality, kind and standards of organic products). Old fashion production ways, lack of financial support are the
main reasons for uncompetitive market relation toward our producers of organic food, and these products have to be
certified in order to export these products. If these products are certified the will have assured placeman on regional
and foreign markets. Buyer- consumer will be controlled and placed on regional and foreign markets.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups:
To improve process of agricultural production through
providing of adequate conditions for certifications and
quality control of organic products.
Agricultural products.
Expected results:
Indicators :
•
Production standards enforced;
•
Standardized production
•
Standardized certificated organic products
•
Specified number of standardized and certificated
products
Implementation period: is 12 months
Main activities:
• Enforcement of standards in production
process;
•
Engagement of certification houses
Main risks:
• Lack of financial funds
•
Complicated and expensive procedures for
certification process
•
Lack of consultants for organic food
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Partners
Ministries of healthy, NGOs, certification houses.
Specified costs : 10.000 € by certification
Financing sources /co- financing :
Sources:
Ministries in charge:
Donators:
20%
80%
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Partners of Drina-Tara Region
272
Project 8:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
Contribution to maintenance of human resources and
To improve a buying out system of organic products.
healthy people.
Name of project/ program: Provided of buying system of organic products.
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
Citizens as primary consumers do not known about the real value of organic food production and that reason is
almost the most important problem. Also, there is not organized buying out system of organic products based on
estimation of potential buyers, get in direct contact with them or medium contacts (shops of healthy food ), catering
services, (restaurants, ecology tourism) and production entrepreneurs.
The main reason of this kind production is that fact in the huge, developed countries demands of organic food
products are huge, each day consumers demand healthy and right way of food and environment protection at all.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups :
To support organic food production and provide
buying out system.
Ministries in charge;
Agricultural producers;
Beneficiaries of organic products- consumers
Expected results:
•
Raised number of organic food production
•
Activated of current buying out stations;
•
Formed new buying out stations;
•
Stimulated buying out system;
•
Provided an export of organic products
Main activities:
• Participation of organic food products on the
domestic and international fairs
•
Forming of buying out stations and activated
of current stations
•
Stimulation of organic products
•
Providing and export
Main risks:
• Lack of market
•
High prices of organic products;
•
Bad citizens buying power ( high
unemployed rate )
•
Indifference and citizens ignorance
Indicators :
•
Quality of organic produced food for market
demands;
•
Specified number of buying out stations;
•
Bought out of produced organic products
(Otkupljene količine organskih proizvoda)
•
Stimulated for specific kind of organic products;
•
Continued export of domestic and foreign market
Implementation period: is 12 months
Specified costs: 30.000 €
273
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Partners ( i)
Ministries of healthy and agriculture, Agriculture
Association NGOs, banks, local governments and
buyers.
Financing sources /co- financing :
Sources:
Local governments :
Donators:
20%
80%
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Partners of Drina-Tara Region
274
Project 9:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
Contribution for reducing pollution of environment
Biodiversity protection.
Name of project/ program: Biodiversity search and marking of nature sources.
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
To research biological differences, and ecological various values of this Region (municipality areas), realize other
needs and problems and theirs solutions. Basic goal is arising of awareness at the local level and stimulate civil society
according to the sustainable development.
Overall project objectives:
- With our operating, distributing of leaflets, we can
influence on the awareness of target groups;
- main negative factors in this Region;
- organized information collecting on the field – analysis
of information
- established networks of announcement and cooperation
with other sides in the area of researching procedure.
Target groups:
- maintenance of data base
•
Ministries in charge
•
Agencies for environment protection
•
Public sector
•
Private and civil sector
•
Medias
•
Citizens of this Region
•
Youth
Expected results:
1. Better knowledge of environmental: animal and
plant floras and needs for their prevention;
2. Active operation in local communities is raising
awareness about environment protection.
Indicators :
Main activities :
• Formed research teams;
Implementation period: is 3 years.
•
Dates about kind and stations of animals;
•
Specification and marking nature sources;
•
Identification of endemic kinds;
•
Data base;
Main risks:
• Indifference of local institutions for research in
the area of this Region;
5.
Previous work for biodiversity research;
6.
Huge importance of dates base;
Specified costs: 100.000 €
275
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Ministries for environment protection, members , NGOs,
PMF Kragujevac and PMF Podgorica
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Eco - centre „Caparić“
Sources:
Local government :
Donators:
276
20%
80%
Project 10:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
Contribution for reducing pollution of environment.
Biodiversity protection.
Name of project/ program: Maintenance of documentation and project proposals related for the Drina-Tara Region
and the Drina valley.
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
Convention about biological variety of United nation (in next : Convention) admits the right of each country on disposal
its sources and biodiversities 1, but it’s also from these countries expected for support on these three aims of
Convention: 1) protection of variety of biodiversity, 2) use of sustainable biodiversity;
3) Right profit division. Defined obligations in Convention article 6. Which contents: all states- countries, in according
to theirs possibilities;
- need to maintenance national strategies, plans or programs for protection of biological varieties,
- To integrate protection principles, sectors policies and other relevant documents.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups:
To maintenance proposals and documentation for
protection of Drina – Tara Region and Drina valley.
•
Ministries in charge
•
Agencies for environment protection
Expected results:
Protected Drina-Tara Region;
Indicators :
Main activities :
Project proposals and documentation for protection of
Drina-Tara Region
Implementation period: is 4 years.
Main activities:
• Indifferences of local government
Specified costs : 250.000 €
•
High number of pollutions
•
Lack of documentation;
7.
Convention about biological varieties of United
Nations
Financing sources /co- financing :
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Sources:
Partners
Partners group of Drina-Tara Region, local government,
NGOs;
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Institutes and Ministries for environment protection.
Local government :
Donators:
277
20%
80%
Προϕεχτ 11:
Στρατεγιχ οβϕεχτιϖε: (Προϕεχτ ιδεα χαν χοντριβυτ
ε το ωηιχη στρατεγιχ οβϕεχτιϖε?)
Σεχτορσ γοαλσ: (Προϕεχτ ιδεα χοντριβυτεσ το τηεσε σ
εχτορσ οβϕεχτιϖεσ?)
Χοντριβυτιον φορ ρεδυχινγ πολλυτιον οφ ενϖιρονµ Βιοδιϖερσιτψ προτεχτιον.
εντ.
Ναµε οφ προϕεχτ/ προγραµ: Μαιντενανχε οφ Λοχαλ Εχολογιχαλ Αχτιον Πλανσ (ΛΕΑΠ), ιν µυνιχιπαλιτιεσ ω
ιτηουτ ιτ
Προϕεχτ ϕυστιφιχατιον (προβλεµ ανδ σολυτιον) ανδ σηορτ προϕεχτ βριεφ:
ΛΕΑΠ δεφινεσ αρεασ ανδ τηειρσ χυρρεντ στατε αβουτ ενϖιρονµεντ προτεχτιον− σπεχιφιχ πλαχε ανδ ρεγιον.
ΛΕΑΠ δεφινεσ προβλεµσ ανδ πριοριτιεσ αιµ ον ρατιοναλ υσε οφ φινανχιαλ βυδγετ ιν ορδερ το σολϖε ενϖιρο
νµενταλ προβλεµσ.
Οϖεραλλ προϕεχτ οβϕεχτιϖεσ:
Ταργετ γρουπσ :
Μαιντενανχε οφ Λοχαλ Εχολογιχαλ Αχτιον Πλανσ
(ΛΕΑΠ) ιν µυνιχιπαλιτιεσ ωιτηουτ τηεσε.
Μυνιχιπαλιτιεσ ωιτηουτ ΛΕΑΠ
Εξπεχτεδ ρεσυλτσ:
4. Ενφορχεδ ΛΕΑΠ ιν σπεχιφιχ µυνιχιπαλιτιε
σ
Ινδιχατορσ :
Μαιν αχτιϖιτιεσ:
Ιµπλεµεντατιον περιοδ: ισ 12 µοντησ.
Μαιν ρισκσ :
Σπεχιφιεδ χοστσ : 50.000 
Μαιντενανχε οφ ΛΕΑΠ;
•
Λοχαλ γοϖερνµεντ ινδιφφερενχε
Στατυσ οφ προϕεχτ πρεπαρατιον:
◊) Προϕεχτ ισ ρεαδψ φορ ιµπλεµεντατιον
β) Ποσιτιϖε στυδψ πρε  φεασιβιλιτψ (πρεδ− ιζϖοδ
λϕιϖοστι)
χ) ®∑χηνιχαλ δοχυµεντατιον ανδ αναλψσισ οφ εξ
πενσεσ
δ) Προϕεχτ προποσαλ
∑) Προϕεχτ ιδεα
8.
Λοχαλ εχολογιχαλ αχτιον πλανσ
Φινανχινγ σουρχεσ /χο− φινανχινγ :
Σουρχεσ:
Λοχαλ γοϖερνµεντ :
20%
∆ονατορσ:
80%
Προϕεχτ αδδρεσσ/ ιµπλεµεντατιον /µονιτορινγ ανδ εϖ
αλυατιον:
Παρτνερσ
Λοχαλ γοϖερνµεντ, ΝΓΟσ, ποτεντιαλ πολλυτερσ;
Παρτνερσ οφ ∆ρινα−Ταρα Ρεγιον
278
Project 12:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
Contribution for reducing pollution of environment.
Biodiversity protection.
Name of project/ program: Founding of Regional Ecological biodiversity
Project justification (problem and solution) and short project brief:
Ecological centre is place for pupils, students, journalists, state administration and all interested people who want to
know more about the nature and its safety on this. This centre is new chance for nature protection, economic progress,
tourism and various old crafts for Ecological centre as implementing organization of these activities.
Overall project objectives:
Target groups:
Formed Regional Ecological biodiversity centre in the
area of Drina – Tara Region
•
Ministries in charge
•
Agencies for environment protection
•
Public sector
•
Private and civil sector
•
Medias
•
Citizens of this Region
•
Youth
Expected results:
Formed
Regional Ecological biodiversity
centre in the area of Drina – Tara Region
Indicators :
Main activities:
Education of local citizens and centre visitors in the area
of environment protection and sustainable development
Implementation period: is 12 months.
Co- financing of local governments
Additional ecotourism centre, re – animate of old crafts
and regional promotion;
Centre for young people education oriented on
ecological problems
Biodiversity centre of this Region
279
Main risks:
• Indifference of professional institutions
Specified costs : 200.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners)
Partners group of Drina-Tara Region
Ministries for environment protection
Institutes for nature protection
Sources:
Ministries of environment protection :
Donators:
20%
80%
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Eco centre - Caparić
Prijatelji Srebrenice- Association
Da zaživi selo Pljevlja- Association
280
Project 13:
Strategic objective :
Sectors goals :
(Project idea can contribute to which strategic
objective?)
(Project idea contributes to these sectors objectives?)
Ecological education
To maintain clean and healthy environment.
Name of project/ program: Organization of educations: seminars, workshops and feasibility study for project
maintenance in the area of environment protection in the Drina-Tara Region.
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Ecological problem is general and most serious problem of this Region. The need of environment protection and
management of ecological risks represent a kind of stimulant for social- sustainable development. Only those people
that have knowledge about ecological issues at the right way can be involved in the process of environment protection.
According to these facts, it is also necessary to improve and promote process of professional education in related area in
purpose of expert’s preparation in integral management of environment. Well done projects present huge opportunity for
attraction funds for European Fond.
Overall project objectives:
Target group :
To arise level of awareness and knowledge in the area of
environment protection.
Public and education institutions, private and civil sector,
medias…
Expected results :
• Realized public and media campaign for the
Drina – Tara Region;
• 10 trainings held for 10 representatives of
professional stuffs related to issues of projects
maintenance and management of project cycle,
in the area 10 municipalities of the Drina – Tara
Region
• 30 workshops maintained for representatives of
private, civil and public sectors
Indicators :
• Distributed of 10.000 leaflets and informativeeducative brochures
• Medias announcement;
• Radio shows
• 10 trainings held in the areas of project
maintenance and management of project cycle
• 100 participants trained in the area of 10
municipalities of Drina – Tara Region
• 30 workshops held for representatives of public,
private and civil sectors
Main activities :
• To carry out of public and medias campaign
Implementation :
Duration of project is 12 months.
•
To organize trainings for maintenance projects
and feasibility study
•
To organize educative workshops for public,
private and civil sector
Main risks :
• Indifference of audience
Specified costs :
100.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
Sources: Local government 20%
Donators funds 80%
281
evaluation:
Local governments, associations, education institution,
medias, science institutions...
282
„Prijatelji Srebrenice“ Association
Project 14:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To maintain clean and healthy environment.
To influence on citizens awareness about the importance of
maintenance healthy and clean environment.
Name of project/ program : Marking of ecological days
Project justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
It is essential to initiate specific activities because of citizen’s irresponsibility toward the nature and also they have not
enough awareness about the importance of nature. These activities need to influence on arising of level citizen’s
awareness as well as marking of ecological days. Activities aim on alarming the audience about the communities’
problems, ways for fair relation to nature as much as the possibilities for prevention of pollution in the area of non recoverable nature resources.
Target group :
Overall project objectives:
Informed and educated
importance of nature
citizens
about
Expected results :
•
Marked ecological days
Main activities :
• Marking of world ecological days.
Main risks :
• Indifference of audience
the
An audience in the Drina – Tara Region
Indicators :
• Leaflets, brochures,
workshops
posters,
clean
Implementation period:
Duration of project is 12 months.
Specified costs:
10.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Partner group of Drina-Tara region
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Local government and NGO sector
Sources: Local government
283
actions,
Project 15:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To maintain clean and healthy environment.
To improve work and cooperation of inspection services in
the Region
Name of project/ program : To improve cooperation between inspection services in the Region
Problem justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Although, there is an enforced law regulative and specific mechanisms for law implementation, level of cooperation
between inspection services is still at law level that can be relevant for completely environment protection. Main reasons
of insufficient environment protection are:
There is no unique cadastre of pollutions in the Region,;
Insufficient monitoring and controls mechanisms;
Ecological policy – polluter pays is out of use;
Disconnection of inspection services;
Together with implementation of law regulative would be established monitoring mechanisms. Result of that process
would be improved monitoring mechanisms and take the control under the pollution of environment. And also those
refunds, those polluter pays, go to the local government budget as regular income. Also, there is need of establishment
cooperation between municipalities and agencies for environment protection (Podgorica and Belgrade).
Overall project objectives:
Target groups :
To arise level of cooperation and work of inspection
services in the Drina – Tara Region
Expected results :
• To involve an audience with law regulative
relevant for environment protection;
• To connect inspection services in the Region
• To
establish
additional
monitoring
mechanisms;
• To establish unique communication system of
inspection services in the Region;
Main activities :
• Organizing and implementation of public
campaigns
•
Organizing of workshops for inspection
services in the region
•
Activities on network inspection services
Main risks :
• Passivity of local communities
•
Passivity of inspection services
•
Low level of law regulative implementation
•
Local governments
•
Agencies for environment protection
•
Inspection services in the Drina – Tara Region
•
Citizens in the area of Drina – Tara Region
Indicators :
•
Distributed about 10.000 informative leaflets and
brochures
•
5 workshops maintained for inspection services in
the Region
•
Defined additional
mechanisms;
•
Formed network of inspection services
monitoring
Implementation period:
Duration of project is 12 months.
Specified costs :
50.000 €
284
and
control
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Partners:
Partners group of Drina-Tara region
Financing sources /co- financing :
Sources:
•
Local government 20 %
•
Donators funds 80 %
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Local government and NGO sector
285
Project 16:
Strategic objective: (Project idea can contribute to
which strategic objective?)
Sectors goals: (Project idea contributes to these sectors
objectives?)
To provide an adequate support to improvement of
environment protection.
To contribute various kind of activities in the area of
environment protection on the local and regional level too.
To promote a dialogue between various stakeholders those
are participating in the area of environment protection.
Name of project/ program : Establishment of Regional Ecological Centre of Drina – Tara Region ( REC DT )
Justification (problem and solution) and short brief of program/project:
Establishment of REC DT – is one of the activities at the regional level as the activities of environment protection.
Considering with these named activities we can initiate a dialogue and cooperation between various stakeholders those
which operate in the area of environment protection. Also these activities would be to make much easier the
implementation of local and regional ecological projects. This project is also an example of positive practice of
establishment cross border cooperation in the area of Drina – Tara Region. Activities would be realized through: various
campaign (subject: influence on citizens awareness about the nature importance), improvement of institution and
organization capacities, providing of financial support for regional and local projects, collecting information about
current stage in the area of environment protection, assessment of project influence on environment, forming unique
data base and other activities in the reason of make better life of citizens in the Drina Tara Region.
Overall project objectives:
Target group :
To initiate establishment of Regional Ecological Centre
of Drina-Tara Region ( REC DT )
Government staffs;
Scientific- search organization;
NGOs
Medias
Citizens of Drina – Tara Region
Expected results:
•
Promoted cross
cooperation;
border
and
regional
Indicators :
• Notes of work meetings with stakeholders;
•
•
Provided support to ( REC DT ) establishment;
•
Provided financial funds for
activities;
•
Work strategy of REC DT;
•
Formed REC DT team work;
•
REC DT promotion
REC DT
Main activities:
•
Activities in order to promotion Cross border
and regional cooperation;
•
Meetings with stakeholders as participants in
the area of environment protection;
•
Organizing of donator conference
•
Activities on maintenance of REC DT Strategy;
•
Decision about active support founding and work
REC DT;
Donators conference;
•
Formed Financing Fond for REC DT;
•
Strategic document of REC DT work;
•
Public announcement;
•
Board for employees selection in REC DT
•
List of team members / employees of REC DT;
•
Notes for young people;
•
Informative leaflets
Implementation period
Duration of project is 12 months.
286
•
Public announcement for employees in REC
DT;
•
Forming of board for employees in REC DT
•
Activities for promotion REC DT;
Main risks :
•
Indifference of audience ;
•
Lack of donators interests in REC DT;
•
Lack of professional staffs;
Specified costs :
150.000 €
Status of project preparation:
а) Project is ready for implementation
b) Positive study pre – feasibility (pred- izvodljivosti)
c) Теchnical documentation and analysis of expenses
d) Project proposal
е) Project idea
Financing sources /co- financing :
Partners
Local government, Ministries, Development Agencies,
NGO, private, public and civil sectors
Project address/ implementation /monitoring and
evaluation:
Sources:
•
Local government 20 %
•
Donators funds 80 %
Local government and NGO sector
287
ANNEX I:
Quantitative and Qualitative Data on 7 identified rural cross border regions suitable for
ABD approach
288
near proximity of highway, railway and river
Position peripherality/centr
ality
73
69,7
72,66
45
45
68
% of forestry land
13
21,7
7,85
55%
23
22
the most valuable arable land in B&H
Prevailing climate
continental climate
90 m
Average high
above sea level
(Mountain peak if
exists)
National parks,
Nature parks,
protected area
hunting ground
83
90 m
235 m
250 m/500 m130 m
46 61.8
47.3
54
43 28.3
14
5 4.7
wetland Gromiželj w no
Forest
reserve
“Vukovarske
dunavske
ade”-special
reserve of
forestry
vegetation
and
monument of
landscape
architecture
in Ilok
120 m
Middle-good
and high quality
arable soil
Limited-good arable soil
Mostly good
quality arable
soil
91 m
90 m
80 m
Landscape
protected area:
river “Spačva”
archaelological
sites: “Podlučje”,
“Kološtar”,
“Cripnjača”,
“Marikovo”,
“Duge Njive”
Not officially specified
Special
forest
reserve
“Rudiševo
”, Nature
monument
“Hrast
lužnjak”slavonian
oak,
Protected
area of 11
trees of
elm,
Lanscape
Bijeljina I establishedno
Yes, rich forest with oak trees is a good background for hunting
Rafting spots
No
NO
very rich source geo no
No
Caves
Šuplja stije and Novano
No
Geothermal waters rich source on 1500 not identified
artificial lakes excelleexcellent fishing spots (8 rivers)
Good quality
of soil for
intensive
agriculture
production
8
31
loess plateau
with 13 type or
soil mainly
chernozem
80 m
84 m
Sabac
105 m
13
Good quality
of soil for
intensive
agriculture
production.
Also,
significant
number of
land plots
Nature
Reserve Bara
Zasavica is
only 8 km
away from the
center of the
Hrast Zeke
Buljubaše
689m
mountain Cer
Part of Nature
Park Fruska
Gora
Nature
Reserve
Bara
Zasavica
-
-
Spa Kulina and
valley of creek
Velesic.
Natinal park,
"Grgurevačka
pećina"
Military hunting
ground
Nepricava in
Morovic
Rafting on
Drina
Spa Koviljaca,
Badanja and
Radalja
Yes in VSC, but not properly used for tourism or similar
Terrain rich in thermal waters
Fishing tourism- lot of rivers
and lakes like Sot, Moharac
289
36
Good quality of soil for
intensive agriculture
production
No
3 artificial coal mining very important
Loznica
Bogatic
Sid
Municipality Sid Located north west part of Central Serbia.
is located on the
south west of
Vojvodina
province
79,6
60,5
57,5
75,5
Moderate continental climate.
Forest reserve Not officially
“Vukovarske
specified
dunavske ade”,
«Kalvarija,
Orlinac, Staro
groblje»=>anci
ent history
archaeological
site
Mitrovica
Gunja
39%
Humid-continental climate
85m-500m
Sremska
Drenovci
Vrbanja
87% 44.8
territorial and
administrative
center of the
Srem
Administrativ
74,2
low land, hill hilly region, gHigh quality arable soil, good High quality
arable soil
arable soil
Spa centers
Other relevant…
Nijemci
Peripheral in Vukovar Srijem County (VSC), border with Serbia
% of agricultural
land in total area
Qualitative
characteristics of
soil
Tovarnik
Lovas
Ilok
LOPARE
DONJI ŽABAR
PHYSICAL
BRČKO
BIJELJINA
(1) DRINA SAVA Region
UGLJEVIK
Annex I: Quantitative and Qualitative Data on 7 identified rural cross border regions suitable for ABD approach
HERITAGE
built
environment,
quality of
housing,
architecture,
monuments
and
landmarks
BIJ
ELJ
INA
BRČKO
DONJI
ŽABA
R
LOPARE
UGLJEVIK
Ilok
Lovas
Tovarnik
Nijemci
Vrbanja
Drenovci
Gunja
Sremska
Mitrovic
a
Sid
Bogatic
Loznica
Sabac
3 sacral
objects, 4
archaeologic
al sites, 2
memorial
objects- see
Historical
monuments
3 sacral
objects, 2
archaeologic
al sites, 2
memorial
objects-see
Historical
monuments
1 sacral
object, 1
profane
object, 2
memorial
objects, 1
archaeolo
gical sitesee
Historical
monumen
ts
Monaster
y
Sirmijum
skih
mucenika,
Church
Sv.
Stefana
Roman
catholic
church
Zupa
Old
Serbian
Church
Greek
church
Monaster
y Privina
Glava
and Holy
Nikola in
Sid
Memorial
complex
Sremski
front
Memorial
places and
monuments
(Sanac Zeke
Buljubase)
Ethno park is
Sovljak
Loznički
grad,
monumen
t to
brothers
Nedic in
Čokešini,
memorial
ossuary
on Ceru
and
Gucevo,
monumen
t in
Draginac
and other
places
Misar
monument
and museum
Asik grave
Monasteries
Cokesina,
Kaona,
Petkovica,
Radovasnica
Memory
charnelhouse in
Tekeris, built
in honor of
killed
Serbian
soldiers in
Cerska battle
War devastated are, partially renewed
Goo
d
quali
ty of
hous
ing,
new
archi
tectu
re,
not
well
orga
nize
Peop
le
libra
ry
from
1932
,
Man
astir
Tavn
a, 14
cent
ury
Good,
specific
architectur
e (Srpska
varoš,
church,
first post
office)
good
quality,
no
specific
architec
ture
30% of housing
is still damaged
(war)
good quality, no
specific
attributes
Lots of old buildings and infrastructure which need reconstruction
Srpska
varoš
(part of
the city),
Hotel
Posavina,
Land
bank, first
post office
(protected
monumen
ts)
last war
monum
ents
no
stećci (grave
stones),
Romans villa
Prehistoric,
Roman and
Ottoman
sites, rich
wine history
- The Ilok
Wine Road
and Ilok vine
basements
(from 15th
century), The
Medieval
Old Town,
The
Odescalchi
Castle, The
Ilok town
Museum,
The
Sanctuary,
Church and
Friary of St
John of
Capistrano
“Necanje”type of
embroidery
traditional
handicrafts
emb
roid
ery
basket
knitting
embroid
ery
embroidery
-
Local heritage,
most
important
feature
Mus
eum
of
Sem
beria
,
Man
astir
Tavn
a, 14
Srpska
varoš
(part of
the city),
Hotel
Posavina,
Land
bank, first
post office
(protected
not
stećci (grave
stones),
courthouse
n/a
Parish
Church St.
Georgija,
Catholic
Church St.
Mihovil
3 sacral
objects, 5
archaeologica
l sites, 3
ethnological
sites see
Historical
monuments
3 sacral
objects, 5
archaeologic
al sites, 4
memorial
objects see
Historical
monuments
Monaster
y Tronosa
Not specified
“Zlatovez”type of
embroidery
“Zlatovez”type of
embroidery
mixture of the Slavonian and Austro-Hungarian tradition
290
“Zlatovez” –
type of
embroidery
mixture of
the
Slavonian,
Srijem and
AustroHungarian
tradition,
Presented in
ethno park in
Sovljak
Sava
Sumanov
ic gallery
House of
birth of
Vuk
Karadzic
(literature
reformer)
Memorial
museum
of Vuk
Karadzic
A great
number of
architectural
buildings
that are listed
in culturalhistoric
heritage of
national
interest were
cent
ury,
Etno
willa
ge
Stani
sic
Hotels,
accommodatio
n quality,
capacities
accessibility by
air/rail
Typical
products
Health
services
(hospitals,
ambulances,
no of
doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
Educational
system –
monumen
ts)
one
3 hotels, 5
2
only private
one old, not
big
motels, 3
motels,
functional
old
B&B, 516
250
hotel
beds
beds
, few
new
smal
l
hotel
s,
Spa
Dvor
ovi,
550
beds
very well, proximity of regional airports Zagreb, Beograd, Banja Luka,
Tuzla
cabb
age
from
Sem
beria
,
wate
rmel
on
1
regio
nal
hosp
ital,
1am
bula
nce
and
1,2
doct
or/1
000
inha
bitan
ts
very
good
, 12
prim
9 different
accommodati
on capacities
(1 hotel),
Not specified
Accessible by car and bus from Zagreb, Beograd (highway), by rail until Vinkovci, Tovarnik by Danube river, by air
until Osijek (62-130 km)
Hotel
Sirmium
Hotel
Srem
Vila Bela
Ruza
Vila
Kosuta in
Morovic
NISOzone
Sveti
Sava
Zelen
Gora
Cubura
rail
rail
Hotel Bogatic
Birth
place of
Jovan
Cvijic
(geology)
Most
important
cultural
event for
the
communi
ty of
Loznica
is
"Vukov
Sabor"
Hotels
Bravo,
Podrinje
and AD
Drinum
Rest
places
Gucevski
vajati,
Sunny
river
(sport and
recreation
complex)
built in the
city Sabac.
Hotel
Sloboda
Hotel Dvor
Ethno village
Topalovic
Plums,
bestilj,
šljivovica,
sausages
Plums,
bestilj,
šljivovi
ca,
sausage
s
fruit brandy,
bestilj (plum
jam), medical
herbs
Plums, bestilj,
šljivovica,
sausages
Wine, local
cuisine,
cured meat
products
Cereal
production,
not specified
Cereal
production,
different fruit
brandy
Cereal
production ,
not specified
Wood
industry, not
specified
Cured meat
products, not
specified
Wood
industryfurniture,
not
specified
1 hospital,
3
ambulanc
e (with 29
offices),
21 private
specialist
ordination
s, 15
private
dentist
offices,
2,15
doctors/10
00
inhabitant
s
2
preschool
s, 14
primary
only
visiting
doctors
1 ambulance,
0,62
doctors/1000inh
abitans
2 ambulance,
0,62
doctors/1000inh
abitans
1 Health
center
1 ambulance
1 ambulance
3
ambulances
1 ambulance
4
ambulances
1
ambulanc
e
3 = no of
doctors/1
000
inhabitant
s…)
344 = no
of
inhabitant
s per 1
physiciant
1 = no of
doctors/1
000
inhabitant
s…)
885 = no
of
inhabitant
s per 1
physician
t
1 = no of
doctors/1000
inhabitants…
)
696 = no of
inhabitants
per 1
physiciant
2 = no of
doctors/1
000
inhabitant
s…)
424 = no
of
inhabitant
s per 1
physician
t
3 = no of
doctors/1000
inhabitants…
)
363 = no of
inhabitants
per 1
physiciant
one
primary
school
3 primary
schools (15
local classes), 1
secondary
15 primary
schools, 1
secondary
school
Primary
school,
kindergarten
situated at
1 Primary
school
situated at 2
different
1 Primary
school at 2
different
places, 1
1 Primary
school
situated in 8
different
3 Primary
schools, no
kindergarten
4 Primary
school
buildings, no
kindergarten
1 Primary
school, no
kindergart
en
29
primary
schools
6
19
primary
schools
2
14 primary
schools
1 secondary
schools
43
primary
schools
5
60 primary
schools
8 secondary
schools
291
Universities,
institutes (list)
Quality of
infrastructure
Local roads
ary
scho
ols,
6
seco
ndar
y
scho
ols
schools, 5
secondary
schools
four
univ
ersiti
es, 2
state
Goo
d
quali
ty
28%
are
magi
steri
al
road
s,
54%
local
road
s, no
high
way
two
faculties
no
Fairly
good
poor
very bad
good
330 km
(25%
needs
reconstruc
tion)
45 km,
11%
magiste
rial
roads,
90% of
all
asphalt
roads
50% without
asphalt
100 km
school
places, 1
kindergarten
places over
three
kindergarten
the
different
municipality,
places in
no
Ilok,
kindergarten
Secondary
school with 5
programs:
General
Gymnasium,
Agrotourist
technician,
Agricultural
techniciangeneral,
Tailor,
Greengrocer
and Winegrower
technician
University of Osijek in Osijek-Baranja County, Associate Degree college in Vukovar
secondary
schools
preschool
institution
s
1 higher
schools
Local road density below County average, quality needs improvement
•Internati
onal
motorway
E-70 from
Belgrade
to Zagreb
(part of
corridor
10) runs
just
outside
the town.
•Regional
motorway
R-103
BelgradeRepublic
of Srpska.
•Regional
motorway
M-21
Novi SadSremska
Mitrovica
-Šabac.
•Regional
motorway
M-18
Sremska
Mitrovica
-Bijeljina.
•Belgrade
internatio
nal airport
at 40 km
distance.
•Navigabl
292
secondar
y schools
18
preschool
institutio
ns
1 preschool
institutions
secondar
y schools
6
preschool
institutio
ns
54 preschool
institutions
3 higher
schools
All
settlements
are linked
with network
of local roads
and regional
roads. E-70
high way is
passing close
as well as
other regional
roads.
Regional
roads that
connect
Belgrade
and
Sabac
with
Zvornik
(М-19),
LoznicaValjevo
Railway
RumaSabacLoznicaZvornik
80 km
from E70
Quality
of roads
is low.
Close to
highway
E70, near
regional
roads that
link Serbian
regions with
Bosnia and
Hercegovina
and Croatia.
Close to
airport in
Belgrade.
Regional
road M19
(BelgradObrenovacŠabacLoznica-M.
Zvornik) and
M21(Novi
Sad-RumahighwayŠabacValjevoUžice)are
cross cutting
in the Sabac
muicipality.
Very
developed
network of
regional and
local roads.
Rail road
RumaŠabac-
0
Crossing
point
Batrovci
is on
internatio
nal road
E-70. On
the north
one part
goes to
Sid and
splits on
north
west
wing
toward
crossing
point
Tovarnik
and north
east wing
that goes
to
crossing
point Sot.
Good
regional
roads
give solid
connectio
n and
position
of Sid
municipal
ity.
Rail road
that
Electricity,
water,
sewage…
elect
ricit
y
and
wate
r
supp
ly is
good
, but
sewa
ge is
poor
only
7%
of
hous
ehol
ds
are
cove
red,
wast
ewat
er
treat
ment
good
water
supply,
poor
sewerage
services,
good
electric
supply,
wastewate
r
treatment
good
electrici
ty
supply
80% of
househo
lds, no
water
and
sewerag
e, no
wastew
ater
treatme
nt
electro supply
very old, not
working
properly, only
30% have water
supply and 20%
sewage,
wastewater
treatment
water supply for
all households
(local network),
sewerage net
poorly
developed,
good electro
distribution
Good quality
of
telecommuni
cation net,
electricity
needs
reconstructio
n and
modernizatio
n, sewage
exists
partially,
agriculture
affects water
quality
Good quality
of
telecommuni
cation net,
electricity
needs
reconstructio
n and
modernizatio
n, sewage is
not properly
solved, bad
water quality
Telecommuni
cation and
Electricity
needs
reconstructio
n, sewage
does not exist
293
Good quality
of
telecommuni
cation net,
electricity
needs
reconstructio
n and
modernizatio
n, sewage
does not
exist
Good quality
of
telecommuni
cation net
and
electricity,
no sewage
Good quality
of
telecommuni
cation net,
electricity
needs
reconstructio
n and
modernizatio
n, sewage
does not
exist
-
e River
Sava.
•Thessalo
nicaBelgradeVienna
railroad,
runs right
through
the town
connects
Belgrade
and
Zagreb
goes over
territory
of Sid.
Also M18
and
M.18.1
- The
availabl
e
industri
al zones
Lake
(Jezero)
and
North
(Sever)
in
Sremsk
a
Mitrovi
ca have
power
transfor
mers of
2*630k
V of
installe
d
power
existing
water
supply
Ø200
mm
have an
existing
sewerag
e
network
Sava
river
constitute
the
border of
municipal
ity
territory.
Good
system of
drainage
channels,
with bad
quality of
water,
used also
for waste
waters.
No waste
water
treatment
facilities
and all
waters
from
sewerage
network
are taken
to river
Bosut.
All
settlements
have
electricity
Good quality
of ground
water which
is used for
municipal
water system.
Sewage and
water supply
system not
completed
Potential in
geothermal
waters
Rivers
Drina,
Jadar and
Stira
All
settlemen
ts have
electricity
Good
quality of
ground
waters.
Potential
in
geotherm
al waters
Loznica-M.
Zvornik-BiH
is active.
Municipality
is located on
the boyent
part of river
Sava and has
potential of
linking with
river trafic of
Serbia and
Europe.
There are
two springs
for water
supply with
third one in
construction
that cover
the needs of
whole
territory of
Sabac
municipality.
70% of city
Sabac is
covered with
sewage
system and
suburban
areas are in
plan to
connect with
main system.
Macva
region has a
solid system
of channels
for drainage
and
irrigation.
Out of city
Sabac the
water supply
system does
not exist
except
(Jelenca and
Stitara) and
in most cases
the quality of
water from
own wells is
low quality.
There are no
sewage
systems out
of city and
no waste
water
treatment
facilities.
Electricity
system exist
Other if
relevant:
only
10%
of
popu
latio
n
have
inter
net
conn
ectio
n
there
is
two
Tv
stati
on
and
5
radio
stati
ons
30% of
household
have
acces to
internet
Great water resources which need better management and marketing
Existing telephone lines
Existing telephone lines
Telecommuni
cation system
cover 24
phones on
100 citizens
and covers
the whole
territory but
the quality
and voltage
is not regular
and
electricity
facilities on
the territory
of Sabac
municipality
are in poor
shape with
urgent need
for
rehabilitation
Solid system
of
telecommuni
cation
facilities.
Existing
telephone
lines
No
Gasificati
on
systemuntil
2013.
Main gas
pipeline
pass
through
municipal
ity and
gasificati
on is in
the
process
Gas pipe line
BatajnicaSabacZvornik is
passing
through
municipality.
However the
gas net in
settlements
does not
exist and
only smaller
part of city
Sabac is
covered with
gasification
network.
GDP munic./ GDP national
GDP structure
(regional/zupanija level if
117,82
138,99
60,76
38,29
174,59
2.8% -for whole VSC
0,74%
Zupanija (County) level (VSC)
294
0,37%
0,24%
0,54%
Sabac
Loznica
Bogatic
Sid
Sremska
Mitrovica
Gunja
Drenovci
Vrbanja
Nijemci
Tovarnik
Lovas
Ilok
UGLJEVIK
LOPARE
DONJI ŽABAR
BRČKO
BIJELJINA
ECONOMIC
does not exist on
municipality
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Public
Most important sectors
identified in local
development strategies
Food
industry
and truism
Wages/national average
97,59
9%
8%
23%
43%
13.0**
20.3**
32.0**
34.7**
Food
industry,
trade, metal
industry
97,22
Agriculture
57,22
Agricultur
e and
forestry,
metal
industry
Electro power
production
and
agriculture
83,16
132,28
21.7%
24.4%
34.9%
18.9%
1.Agriculture
2.Building
3. Transport
4.Clothing
1.Agriculture
2.Building
3.Clothing
1.Agricult
ure
2.
Building
1.Agricult
ure
2.Food
industry
1.
Agriculture
2. Wood
industry
1. Agriculture
2. Wood
industry
3. Trade
1. Wood
industry
2.
Agricultur
e
Average
income per
capita
(Ilok)=73%
of national
Average
income per
capita
(Lovas)=76%
of national
Average
income
per capita
(Tovarnik
)=
68.98%
of
national
Developm
ent index
of
Tovarnik
– 67.35%,
VSC has
penultima
te
regional
competiti
veness
index (of
21
Croatian
counties)
Agro
Tovarnik
company,
Agricultur
al
cooperati
ves
Average
income
per capita
(Nijemci)
= 54.39 %
of
national
Average
income per
capita
(Vrbanja)=
48.38% of
national
Average
income per
capita
(Drenovci)=
34.21% of
national
Average
income
per capita
(Gunja)=
32.96% of
national
Developm
ent index
of
Nijemci –
59.27%,
VSC has
penultima
te
regional
competiti
veness
index (of
21
Croatian
counties)
Agricultur
al
cooperati
ves,
agricultur
al
company
“Banovci
”, trade
“Kajkić”
Developme
nt index of
Vrbanja –
55.83%,
VSC has
penultimate
regional
competitive
ness index
(of 21
Croatian
counties)
Development
index of
Drenovci –
46.09%, VSC
has penultimate
regional
competitiveness
index (of 21
Croatian
counties)
Developm
ent index
of Gunja
– 4.,85%,
VSC has
penultima
te
regional
competiti
veness
index (of
21
Croatian
counties)
“Hrvatske
šume” –
limited
liability
company,
public
enterprise
for forest
and
woodland
managemen
t in the
Republic of
Croatia
Agricultural
cooperatives:
“Napredak”
(cereal and
livestock
production),
“Sekice”
(cereal
production),
“Kulen Šokac”
(cereal and
livestock
production,
transport), other
are not
“Amazon
a d.o.o.”furniture
productio
n
HDI or poverty rates if
exists (if not describe
situation at national level)
There is no data about poverty line or level of poverty at municipality level.
Anyhow the last investigations suggest that 17% of population in B&H lives
under the poverty level. Having in mind that big part of population are Roma
it is expected to that situation in this municipalities is worst then national
average suggest. It very important to outline that almost 1/3 of population
lives very near to the poverty border, so any worsening of economic situation
will push them under the poverty line.
Development
index6 of Ilok
– 71.10%,
VSC has
penultimate
regional
competitivene
ss index (of
21 Croatian
counties)
Development
index of
Lovas –
67.71%, VSC
has
penultimate
regional
competitivene
ss index (of
21 Croatian
counties)
Big players, companies,
structure of enterprises,
profile (describe and list
most important)
Sava
Semberia
(vegetable
& fruit
processing
), Elvako
(metal
industry),
SEP (auto
industry),
Meha drvo
(wood
processing
)
Iločki
podrumi and
Agro-Ilok
(wine
production),
Borovo
(footwear)
“Triko”Clothing
industry,
Agricultural
cooperatives:
“Lovas” and
“Nova
zadruga”,
agricultural
company =>
“Vupik”
Bimal
Brčko,
Shugar
plant,
Bosna plod,
Brčko gas,
Agro group
Gold MG
(cattle
feeding),
Agrex
(eggs,
chiken),
Galax
(asfalt),
Kompanija
Jovan
(wood
building
elements)
AD FOP
(brick
products),
Kvistin
mode
(textile),
Smiljevac
prom
(boats),
Agro
Koraj
(cooperati
ve)
35,61
25,80
38,43
0,17
1.SME
2.
Environm
ent
3.
53,06
23,95
22,58
0,40
Developm
ent of
SME in
Agro
complex
Tourist
valorizati
on of
nature and
anthropog
enic
resources
77,72
6,00
15,43
0,85
Intensive
agricultur
e
productio
n
Processin
g industry
SME
Utilizatio
n of local
resources
32,79
30,10
37,06
0,05
Development of
Agriculture production
and processing
SME sector development
Tourism, Environment
protection
0,93
0,86
0,75
0,72
0,89
1. Sugar
factory
2.
SL
Mitros,
meat
industry
3.
Sremmil
and
Sremska
mlekaradairy
plants
4.
Ship
yard Sava
Viktoria
oil
Grafo set
d.o.o.
Cetntro
promet
JIT
Tehnic
Uljarica
Agrocoop
Agronom
Debrnja
Evrojug
Hempro
color
1. Mill
industry
"Lala
Stanković
"
2.
Agricultur
e holidng
"Ogled"
3. Factory
of
agricultur
e
mechaniz
ation
Viskoza
Zidar
Elektron
Grafika
Jadar
Lukkompenza
tori
Eling
Domus
Natropak
HK Boro
Skoric
Enikon
Slaughter
houses
Jela and
Sind
Dairy
factory
Sabac
Libertas
Uno
Martin
Interkop
Zorka
complex
U.S. Steel
Serbia
6
Development index in Croatia includes indicators as follows: income per capita, unemployment rate, income of public budget, population trends, and education rate. There are 5 groups of units (municipalities, cities, counties): I. Group= below 75% of Croatian average, II. Group= 75-100%
of Croatian average, III. Group= 100%-125% of Croatian average, IV. Group= above 125% of Croatian average
295
specifiedbusiness zone is
yet to be
developed
NO of firms/1000
inhabitants
Self-employment rate as
percentage of labour force
21,19
Cattle/arable land
Pigs/sown area
Sheep/agr. land
access to market for
20,45
23,2
16,7
13%
18,30%
29.4**
29.4**
29.4**
50.6**
0,09
30,70%
n/a
50.6**
0,15
50.6**
0,16
50.6**
0.8*
Employment rate
Female employment rate
Share of adult social welfare
beneficiaries on total labour
force
Unemployment rate
Farm agricultural
mechanization (number of
tractors per 100ha)
Most important
sectors/products of
agriculture
83,15
37%
22.6%**
22.6%**
47,50%
22.6%**
-
-
-
-
-
Vegetable
and
cereals
Cereals,
vegetable,
industrial
plants
Cattle (meat
production),
cereals
Plum,
peaches,
apricot
fruit
production
(plum)
0,31
1,12
0,07
well
0,17
1,63
0,05
good, food industry
0,77
1,61
no
n/a
n/a
n/a
5
5.
Pro
plastplastic
materials
and
recycling
6. Valve
industry
4.45
6.96
1.49
3.33
3.8
0.005
2.38
14.2% of total
employed
population
11.3% of total
employed
population
39.5% of total
employed
population
41.13%
(VSC)
44%
3.4%
28% of
total
employed
populatio
n
41.13%
(VSC)
31%
3.43%
20.8% of
total
employed
population
41.13%
(VSC)
35%
4.8%
19% of
total
employed
populatio
n
41.13%
(VSC)
33%
3.51%
41.13%
(VSC)
28%
3.07%
41.13% (VSC)
50%
2.79%
15.22% of
total
employed
populatio
n
41.13%
(VSC)
42%
4.09%
17.9%
13
25.6%
11.45
20.7%
10.65
21.4%
7.08
26%
9.22
35.2%
10.96
42.6%
11.99
Wine industry
Cereal
production
Cereal
productio
n
Cereal
and
vegetable
productio
n, wood
industry
Cereal
production,
wood
industry
Cereal,
livestock
productioncured meat
production
Furniture
productio
n, other
not
specified
n/a
n/a
n/a
Undeveloped and limited accession to market
296
Undevelo
"1.Maj"
4. "Zroka
plastika"
PVC
profile
productio
n
Novitas
Galeb
Group
6
20-21%
paper
productio
n, ship
building
and
industry
(Crop
productio
n) and
other is
linked to
processin
g industry
and trade.
(Crop
productio
n and
animal
breeding)
(Crop
productio
n and
animal
breeding).
Also there
fruit and
vegetable
growing
is present.
Mainly
quite
diverse
agricultur
e
productio
n.
18,69
156,36
19,56
Good
7,17
85,74
8,24
Good
55,37
280,80
82,36
Good
40,34
155,02
48,23
Solid
Crop
productio
n).
Animal
breeding
had
significan
t turmoil’s
in last two
decades
that led to
decreased
productio
n. Fruit
growing
is
increasing
due to
increased
export
opportunit
ies.
Vegetable
productio
n is very
developed
with good
possibiliti
es for
sales on
green
markets
of bigger
cities.
Good
agricultural products/food
processing industry
developed
agricultur
al
cooperati
ves - well
equipped
ped and
limited
accession
to market
access to
marketclose to
capital
(60km)
and
(50km)
capital of
province
(, close to
border
with BiH
(30km)
and
Croatia
(25km).
access to
market
due to
good
regional
road
network
and close
to border
crossings
and
capital of
Country
and
Province.
access to
market
due to
good
regional
road
network
and close
to border
crossings
and
capital of
Country
and
Province.
access to
market,
due to
important
position
near
border
and
connectio
n with
capital.
Large
number of
companie
s in trade
and
services.
Food
processin
g industry
is not
developed
.
access to
market
due to
good
regional
road
network
and close
to border
crossings
and
capital of
Country
and
Province.
Gunja
Sremska
Mitrovica
Sid
Bogatic
Loznica
Sabac
Drenovci
Vrbanja
Nijemci
Tovarnik
Lovas
Ilok
UGLJEVIK
LOPARE
DONJI ŽABAR
BRČKO
BIJELJINA
SOCIAL
69%
0,66
0,62
0,65
0,67
0,68
Croats 64%
Bosnians
14%
Serbs 4%
Serbs
(87.3%)
Croats
(3.0%)
Yugoslavs
(1.4%)
Hngarian
(0.9%)
Serbs
(77.6%)
Slovaks
(6.5%)
Croats
(5.4%)
Rusyns
(3.4%)
Serbs
(83.0%)
Bosniaks
(5.5%)
Roma
people
(4.3%)
Yugoslav
s (2.1%)
Serbs
(96.0%)
Roma
people
(0.8%)
Yugoslav
s (0.4%)
Moslems
(0.4%)
NGO of
women
“Zlatne niti
Gunje”
(preservatio
Vojvodina
forests
Craft
association
Museum of
Tourist
organizati
on
Office for
young
Serbs
(97.0%)
Roma
people
(1.5%)
Croats
(0.1%)
Yugosla
vs
(0.1%)
National
Library
Amateu
r theatre
Janko
Tourist
organizati
on
KUD
Karadzic
Agricultur
e advisory
station
Youth
Umbrella,
Women 15-40/ men
15-50 years
Any other issue
relevant for gender
balance
Figures on women
participation in
unemployed
population
Ethical groups,
minorities
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
67%
64%
67%
60%
67%
67%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42,34%
*
42,34%*
Croats % 77
Slovaks
%12.5
Serbs % 6.8
Croats 85%
Hungarians
4.8%
Serbs 6.7%
Croats 91%
Serbs 7%
Slovaks
0.18%
Croats 89%
Serbs 10%
Ukraines 0.22%
Croats 97%
Slovaks 1%
Serbs 0.87%
Croats 87%
Bosnians 4%
Serbs 3%
Civil Society
structure, describe,
list most important
or most active in the
field of agr.
39,
humanitarian
organizations
(40%)
NGOs in
Ilok:
“Škrinjica”
–
association
NGO of
women
“Lovas”
(assistance in
employment,
KUD “A.G.
Matoš”preservation
of traditional
dances,
6 ethno-cultural
societies (KUD),
6 sports and 5
hunting societies,
1information
4 ethnocultural
societies
(KUD), NGO
of women
NGO
“Duhovno
Hrašće” –
association
for promotion
42,34%
number
of
NGOs,
but
focus on
38,8%
not
developed,
5, mostly
culture
5,38%
poor focused on
culture
297
sport
and
culture
Environment,
culture, tourism…
Historical
monuments
People library
from 1932,
Manastir
Tavna, 14
century
Srpska
varoš
(part of
the
city),
Hotel
Posavin
a, Land
bank,
first
post
not
identifie
d yet
Stećci
(grave
stones)
Stećcigrave
stones,
Romans
vilas
for
preservation
of cultural
heritage
“Necanje”.
Association
of
innovation
“Tesla
Ilok”,
Association
of
beekeepers,
Association
of Ilok wine
road, KUD
Julije
Benešićtraditional
dances,
Independent
Youth
Association
social and
legal
protection,
organization
of sports and
cultural
events), KUD
“Ivan Goran
Kovačić”,
Local gazette
“Lovaski
list”, Hunting
association
“Sokol”,
Association
of
greengrocers
and wine
growers
Hunting
associations
“Vepar” and
“Zec” NGO
of
greengrocers
“Rujan”,
NGO of
women
“Tovarnik”
(assistance in
employment,
social and
legal
protection,
organization
of sports and
cultural
events)
science societyfor promotion of
informatics,
NGO of women
“Sveta Katarina”
(organization of
sports events and
preservation of
local handicraft)
1.The
Medieval
Old Town.
2.The
Odescalchi
Castle.
3.The Ilok
town
Museum.
4.The
Sanctuary.
1.Parish
Church St.
Georgija.
2.Catholic
Church St.
Mihovil
1.Catholic
Churches St.
Jakov and St.
Bartol and
Matej
2.Orthodox
Church St.
Georgija
3.Shrine
“Gospa
Ilačka”
1.Chapel St.
Luka, 2.Church
St. Lovro,
3.Church St.
Katarina,
4.archaeological
sites: Podlučje,
Kološtar,
Cripnjača,
Marikovo, Duge
Njive
298
“Poticaj”, 3
sports
societies,
NGO
“Possesio
Werbanya
1443" –
preservation
and
improvement
of traditional
heritage NGO
of women
“Poticaj”
(planning of
cultural
promotion,
organization
of cultural,
humanitarian
and
entertainment
events,
decoration of
church
landscape)
“Cesta zlatne
niti”-Vrbanja
is a part of
this thematic
route which
links
tradition,
hospitality,
gastronomy,
production of
fruit brandy,
customs and
authentic
experience of
Slavonia.
Other places
in VukovarSrijem
County which
are part of
this route are:
Županja,
Štitar, Babina
Greda,
Gradište,
Cerna,
Bošnjaci,i
Drenovci.
1. Catholic
Church
“Pohađanja
Blažene
Djevice
Marije”, other
not specified
of religion
and culture
organizes
event
“Pjesnički
susreti u
Drenovcima”
– Croatian
poetic
manifestation
where
reputed, but
also
unestablished
poets from
Croatia and
neighboring
countries
appear
annually
“Cesta zlatne
niti” “Cesta
zlatne niti”Drenovci is a
part of this
thematic
route which
links
tradition,
hospitality,
gastronomy,
production of
fruit brandy,
customs and
authentic
experience of
Slavonia.
Other places
in VukovarSrijem
County which
are part of
this route are:
Županja,
Štitar, Babina
Greda,
Gradište,
Cerna,
Bošnjaci,i
Vrbanja.
n of local
handicraft),
KUD
“Graničari”,
Bosnian
KUD
“Behar”national
minority of
Bosnian
population
–
preservation
of
traditional
dances,
Multimedia
center
“Studio
kreativnih
ideja”literature,
reading and
kinematics
culture
Srem
Theatre
Dobrica
Milutinovic
Secretariat
for
protection
of
monuments
of culture
Union of
hunters
Inter
municipal
organizatio
n of deaf
and hard of
hearing
Nature
protection
movement
Moto club
Poet
society
Filip
Visnjic
and
Blagoje
Jastrebic
Veselin
ovic,
ethno
park in
village
Sovljak,
culture
center
and
Abrasevic
Home for
children
and youth
Vera
Blagojevi
c
Citizens
associatio
ns
Svetionik,
Taisa, Dar
and
Tarpos
Unions of
sport
fisherman
’s Mahala
and Drina
Union for
study of
herbs and
forest
products
Caritas Šabac,
Roma for
Roma,
Human
heart of
Šabac,
NGO
Light,
NGO
Ecos
1. Church St.
Mihovil
Arhanđel
2.Church
“Rođenje
Svetog Ivana
Krstitelja”,
3.Church St.
Ilija Prorok,
4.archaeologi
cal sites:
1.Church
St. Jakov
Apostol
2.Memorial
object:
“Spomen
grobnica
obitelji
Nikolić”,
Spomen
piramida
1. Old
roman city
Sirmium
lays below
the center
of the town
with only
known
horse racing
arena in the
world, but
Archeolo
gical site
Gradina
and
Berkasov
o.
Monasteri
es and
churches
Buildin
g of
municip
ality
Churche
s
Loznički
grad,
monumen
t to
brothers
Nedic in
Čokešini,
memorial
ossuary
on Ceru
and
Thumb
stone of
Asik
Churches
and
monasteri
es:
Radovasn
ica,
Petkovica
and
office
(protect
ed
monum
ents)
Condition and
functionality of
Cultural Heritage
da li se koriste, jesu
li u upotrebljivom
stanju
well
maintaned
Church and
Friary of St
John of
Capistrano
well
maintai
ned, BH
national
heritage
no
no
no
4.Settlements
of ancient
history:
“Orašče”,
“Jasenik”,
“Rudina
Krčevine”
5.Birthplace
of Croatian
writer A.G.
Matoš
Hartmanova
pustara, Narača,
Gradina, Selo
mausoleum and
many other
sacral, memorial
and ethnological
monuments are
yet to be
officially
protected
“Posavski
Podgajci”
5.memorial
objects:
“Đurići”,
“Čisto”.
Ruskim
zrakoplovci
ma”
3.Archaeolo
gic site
“Bogutovac
”
4.
Municipalit
y building –
profane
object
Bad management and marketing of historical monuments – lack of finance resources
1,509
Crime rates?
1,509
1,509
1,509
won’t be
excavated
Monaster
y Tronosa
Sirmium
Imperial
Palace
complex
Solar clock,
unique in
the world
Churches
and
monasteries
1,509
1,509
Gucevo,
monumen
t in
Draginac
and other
places
Most of
excavated
antiques
are
exhibited
in Sid.
Low
exploita
tion of
resource
s and
weak
mainten
ance.
Most of
monum
ents are
in bad
shape.
1,509
Ugljevik
Ilok
Lovas
Tovarnik
Nijemci
Vrbanja
Drenovci
Gunja
Sremska
Mitrovica
Sid
Bogatic
Loznica
Sabac
0.33
0.48
0.59
Dependence ratio*
5
14.30
25.66
% of population 65+
28
18.37
11.60
% of population up
to 15
5.6
1.27
0.45
Aging ratio **
Educational structure of the population 15+
44**
· Primary
· Secondary
8**
· High
· Without
45**
of agricultural
population
*population less than 15+population over 65)/population 16-65
**population up to 15/population 65+
Lopare
Donji Žabar
Brčko
Bijeljina
HUMAN
0.28
9
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.55
16.8
18.5
0.60
22
16
0.56
15.6
20.3
0.59
17.7
19.3
0.58
16.8
19.8
0.58
16.3
20
0.52
13.9
20.2
0.46
15.15
15.98
0.48
16.04
16.22
0.54
19.07
15.74
0.45
14.29
16.66
0.46
15.39
15.61
1.44
n/a
1.1
0.71
1.3
1.09
1.18
1.22
1.45
1.05
1.01
0.83
1.17
1.01
23.6
40.9
5.5
4.8
13.6
34.2
35.8
3.6
4.7
10.4
32.3
37.9
4.6
5.2
12.2
33
28
2.3
5.7
19.3
32.2
27.3
1.1
9.3
18.3
33.4
26
2.5
8.2
20.5
28.5
37.2
3.7
8.6
7.5
23.91
42.29
8.86
6.04
28.36
37.32
6.28
4.96
29.34
28.80
4.69
9.67
22.29
44.97
7.55
8.08
21.72
42.14
8.83
7.18
13.90
17.15
49.93
10.10
20.61
299
Low
exploitati
on of
resources
which are
in good
condition
Cokesina
Memory
charnelhouse in
Tekeris,
built in
honor of
killed
Serbian
soldiers in
Cerska
battle
Low
exploitati
on of
resources
which are
not in
good
condition.
(2) PCINJA Region
BOSILEGRAD
Located on the south of
Serbia on the border with
Bulgaria on east and
Macedonia on the southwest
TRGOVISTE
Located at the south-east of
Serbia on the border with
Macedonia.
BUJANOVAC
Located at the south of
Serbia on the border with
Macedonia
SURDULICA
Central-eastern part of
Serbia. On east territory of
municipality is border with
Bulgaria.
CRNA TRAVA
Eastern part of Jablanica
District and on the border
with Bulgaria.
Is it close to coastal zone?
% of agricultural land in
total area
no
61.3
no
55.5
no
57.9
no
53.3
no
50.3
% of forestry land
Qualitative characteristics
of soil
35
Meadows and pastures are
predominant. Soil is fertile
for certain crops and
vegetables but configuration
of terrain is not in favor for
intensive agriculture.
34
Hilly- mountain region with
high lands Bele Vode.
Dukata. Cupino hill. Kozjak
and others.
37
Hilly and mountain terrain.
41
Mostly mountains
47
Mountain region with high
percentage of high quality
pastures.
Moderate continental and
mountain climate.
Mixed continental and
mountain climate
Moderate continental
Moderate continental
Mountain climate
600-1922m (Besna Kobila)
Zelencev 1574m
Mountain peaks Kitka and
Kozjak 1300m
From 346m to 1721m
highest peak
the highest peak - Ruen,
2252 meters
Protected area Jaresnik.
Vardenik. Lisisnko lake.
Goles and Bele Vode
/
Protected area Dolina
Pcinje., protected area of
immediate surroundings of
the monastery of St. Prohor
Pčinjski
Mountains Vardenik
(1875m) and Cemernik
(1638m)
Protected area Vlasinsko
Lake
Kacar Zelenicje -Protected
area
picnic sites favourable for
recreation (Kalin
Stone, a tourist and
recreational centre; Cepen
Stone, where there are
fishponds with trout;
waterfalls called Stanechki
sur
Good conditions for hunting
and fishing (details NA)
Dolina Pcinje –fishing and
hunting.
Mountin Jastrebac –
hunting.
Pcinja and Bujanovac lake
for fishing.
PHYSICAL
Position
peripherally/centrality
-
Prevailing climate
Average high above sea
level (Mountain peak if
exists)
National parks. Nature
parks. protected area
Short elaboration. if exists
hunting ground
Fishing on Vlasina lake
Rafting spots
300
3 Hunting areas on
Cemernik for dears and
wild boars
STARO NAGORICANE
North-east of the Republic
of Macedonia. Well
connected with Kumanovo
(50 km) and Skopje (80km)
and Kyustendil (60km) in
The Republic of Bulgaria
RANKOVCE
KRIVA PALANKA
The municipality of Kriva
Palanka is 98 km far from
Skopje. It is directly located
on the
corridor E8, the
international
road way M2 towards the
Republic
of Bulgaria, on northeast
and on north towards the
Republic of Serbia.
no
31.00
Moderate continental
The two main regions: the
mountainous country at the
north and south and the
lowest part Slaviskoto field.
Thus Slavishkoto has
alluvial soil originated from
river sediment. It is include
enough humus, organs
minerals, clay, biogenic
elements and are
characterized by high
fertility. On the river
terraces of Kriva Reka
occur loamy sandy soils
that are also very fertile.
Moderate continental
36.47
deposits of metals (lead,
zinc, antimony, copper,
silver, gold, etc..) as well as
non-metals (bentonitski
clays, tuffs, quartz, etc.).
The mine for lead and zinc,
"Toranica"
The mine and flotation
"Cross Dol"
Moderate continental
Spa centers
/
/
Bujanovac spa
/
/
Caves
Geothermal waters
/
/
/
/
/
/
Potential in geothermal
waters , localitet Masince.
Potential for installation of
wind mills for electricity
production. Mine
Mackatica –molibden (Mo).
/
/
Lead and zinc mine in
Karamanica and there are
some terrains which are not
explored in detailed. with
tungsten and gold
/
Bujanovac spa with 43°C.
35 sources of mineral water.
Findings of Bentonitske
clay
Kaolin clay
Pottery clay
Feldspar findings
White granite.
35 sources of mineral water.
Other relevant…
HERITAGE
built environment.
quality of housing. architecture.
monuments and landmarks
Traditional handicrafts
Local heritage. most important
feature
Hotels. accommodation quality.
capacities
Bosilegrad
Trgoviste
Excavations of Zink. lead.
silver. gold and quartz
Surdulica
In the lower part settlements are compact type , in mountainous areas there are broken type
No
Traditional women outfits
(called Saja).
Indigenous knowledge in
management of resources.
tradition in livestock farming.
fruit and vegetables growing.
favorable environment for
some kinds of agriculture
productions and unpolluted
environment
Hotel Dukat
Vraziji kamen- specific
location that looks like
Djavolja Varos
Church Presvete bogorodice
Monastery Prohor Pcinjski
Church of Holly Peter and
Pavle from VII century.
Archeological site Kale
Krsevica from IV century
Monastery- Palja (IX
century). Av. Arhangel
Church- Sveti Ilija. Sv.
Djordje. Sv. Nikola. Sv.
Pantelejmona. Sv. Trojice.
Petra i Pavla. Arhangela
Mihajla. Vavedenja Presvete
Bogorodice…
Turkish tower
/
These municipalities were established in 1996, when the municipality of Staro Nagorichane
was separated from the municipality of Kumanovo. The municipality of Rankovce was
established after separation from the Municipality of Kriva Palanka.
Crna Trava
Broken type settlements.
Monument of warriors from
Crna Trava
Hammer.
/
Vrazji kamen
Kale Krsevica – arheological
site.
Bujanovac spa.
Houses. architecture. water
mills. bridges. culture- music.
poetry. costumes. dialect
Not sufficiently used although
there are some festivals that
try to preserve local heritage.
none
Ethno village Zlatne ruke (in
construction)
Motel Bujanovac
Vrelo
Accommodation in
monastery Prohor Pcinjski
rail
Novi Rid and Krstinci (in
plan for construction)
Hotel Vlasina
Hotel Narcis and Hotel Jezero
Hotel Srbija
Hotel Vilin Lug
Good connection to main road
and rail corridors.
Bottled water Rosa. furniture.
Electric energy.
no
Forestry fruits and medical
plants.
4 = no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
240 = no of inhabitants per 1
physiciant
16 = no of primary schools
3= no of secondary schools
8 = no of preschool
2 = no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
416 = no of inhabitants per 1
physiciant
6 = no of primary schools
1 = no of secondary schools
1 = no of preschool
accessibility by air/rail
no
no
Typical products
Chees and industry products
(textile and wood processing)
Forestry fruits and medical
plants.
Health services (hospitals.
ambulances. no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
2 = no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
559 = no of inhabitants per 1
physiciant
25 = no of primary schools
1= no of secondary schools
1 = no of preschool
2 = no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
601= no of inhabitants per 1
physiciant
17 = no of primary schools
1= no of secondary schools
5 = no of preschool
Educational system – no. childcare
services. types ofsecondary schools.
Bujanovac
bath “Strnovec” with its
geo-thermal
water that is being used like
a treatment for different
kinds of infections,
rheumatic and other
illnesses
Water. Bottled water.
Orientalis tobacco
(Virdzinija, Berlej).
1 = no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
825 = no of inhabitants per 1
physiciant
41 = no of primary schools
2 = no of secondary schools
25 = no of preschool
301
Building houses –
“Dundjeri”.
Famous for first artisan
school for construction
workers
STARO
NAGORICANE
RANKOVCE
KRIVA PALANKA
institutions
0 = no of higher schools
0 = no of university faculties
No
institutions
0 = no of higher schools
0 = no of university faculties
No
institutions
1 = no of higher schools
0 = no of university faculties
No
institutions
0 = no of higher schools
0 = no of university faculties
No
institutions
0 = no of higher schools
0 = no of university faculties
No
Regional roads P-122 and
P239 connect Bosilegrad with
European highway E-75
P-125 connects municipality
with corridor X and regional
road P-238 toward Kriva
Palanka (Macedonia)
M-1 and M-25. regional road
P-125
Pan European railway
corridor 10 runs through
municipality.
Quality of regional roads is
not satisfactory
Poor road infrastructure with
only one local road which
connects municipality with
Leskovac. Other roads are
only asphalted in sequences.
Electricity grid is supplied
from Leskovac with high and
low voltage cables. The
quality of the grid is solid but
with often interruptions due to
the bad terrain configuration
and low density of population
and bad weather conditions.
Water supply of the city
comes from springs Izvor and
Blat. There are no data about
water systems in smaller
settlements since most of
them are private and without
standards.
Sewage system is covering
Bosilegrad and Rajciloci with
75%. Villages do not have
this system and use septic
holes that causes pollution of
ground waters and active
wells and local water systems.
From National Investment
Plan received funds for
construction of collector for
treatment of waste waters and
construction of water supply
system
Electricity infrastructure of
high and medium voltage is
satisfactory. The capacity of
cables is not to high and
large number of cable
holders are wood poles.
Frequent brakes in electricity
supply.
South Morava river pass
through municipality with
tributaries.
Two mini accumulationKisela voda and Prohor
Pcinski (used for tourism
and recreation and second
one for production of
electricity).
Sewage system covers only
city Bujanovac and Bujovac
spa.
M-1.13 from Vladicin Han to
Bulgaria
P 122 from Svodje to border
with Bulgaria
P 124a connects Surdulica
with M1
Municipality has very good
connection with roads of
international importance.
Water supply is not resolved.
as well as sewage system.
There are two facilities for
processing of drinking water.
There are several villages and
settlements without water
systems or with private water
supply systems.
Sewage system covers city of
Surdulica and 2-3 vilages .
Waste waters of city are sent
in water treatment facility
Alaknice. Villages use septic
holes mainly.
Vlasina is also used as water
accumulation for production
of electricity
No solution for communal
waste disposal
Other if relevant:
Telecommunication- in
Bosilegrad there is digital
telephone central facilities.
Telecommunication- in
Trgoviste there is digital
telephone central facilities.
Telecommunication system
is not satisfactory and one of
the lowest in Serbia.
ECONOMIC
GDP munic./ GDP national
GDP structure (regional/zupanija
level if does not exist on municipality
•
Primary
•
Secondary
•
Tertiary
•
Public
Most important sectors identified in
local development strategies
Bosilegrad
0,02%
Trgoviste
0,02%
Bujanovac
0,20%
Surdulica
0,20%
Crna Trava
0,01%
34,29
32,42
32,07
1,21
1.Industry (textile. furniture.
wood)
2.Agriculture
3.
33,64
25,18
41,18
0,00
na
27,45
50,32
21,44
0,79
Processing industry
Agriculture
Trade
Mining
Constructions
7,69
76,34
15,76
0,20
Utilization of renewable
energy resources
Agriculture- organic
products
SME
Environment protection
15,73
76,34
7,94
0,00
SME
Construction
Fishponds
Services
Universities. institutes (list)
Quality of infrastructure
Local roads
Electricity. water. sewage…
Telecommunication- in
Surdulica there is digital
telephone central facilities.
302
85% of population has
public water supply system
which is old and out dated.
Villages are providing
waters from local springs
and individual water supply
systems.
75% of population from the
central part of municipality
is connected to sewage
system. and waste waters are
directly disposed to river
Vlasina with ought
treatment.
Solid waste is collected only
in central part of
municipality and with ought
recycling is disposed on not
arranged landfill.
Low supply system of
electricity with more than
80% of wooden poles which
are out dated and that are the
situation with transformer
substations. too.
Telecommunication system
is not satisfactory and it
reparation is in progress with
introduction of digital
central facilities favorable
for mountain terrains.
STARO NAGORICANE
RANKOVCE
KRIVA PALANKA
Wages/national average
HDI or poverty rates if exists (if not
describe situation at national level)
Big players. companies. structure of
enterprises. profile (describe and list
mort important)
NO of firms/1000 inhabitants
Self-employment rate as percentage
of labor force
Employment rate,
Female employment rate
Share of adult social welfare
beneficiaries on total labor force
Unemployment rate
7
Farm agricultural mechanization
(number of tractors per 100ha) .
Most important sectors/products of
agriculture
Cattle/arable land
Pigs/sown area
Sheep/agr. land
access to market for agricultural
products/food processing industry
SOCIAL
Women 15-40/ men 15-50
years
Any other issue relevant
for gender balance
Figures on women
participation
Ethical groups. minorities
•
•
0.67
0,605
0.76
0,591
0.83
0,599
0.84
0,605
0.68
0,667
Bor- wood processing
Progres- Backery
Autotransport- Transport of
passengers
Zdravlje leskovac- food
processing
Izgradnja- construction works
Kobos
EI Nis- capacitorproduction
Napredak- agriculture
Anitex- producing textil.
O.D.“KLEKAFUNGI“O.D.“KLEKAFUNGI“O:D:“KONIKA“
processing and distribution
of forest fruits and medicinal
herbs
Heba
Agro-Adrija
Jugokop
Razvitak
Natural Food
Kondiva
Simpo unit Simbi
Jubainvest
/
5301
/
315
/
2048
Rosa –Coca Cola ,
Vlasina HE, Bread and
milch Factory,
Mechanization factory
“Mačkatica”.
Factory of parts for
automobile industry
“Zastava”.
“ Peti septembar” Factory
for isolation materials“Vunizol”. Factory of
stylish furniture “Simpo”.
3 factories of shoe
industry- “Koštana”
Textile industry “Jumko“
, Family dairy Velickovic
/
1499
1692
37,0
19%
186
35,4
9%
147
34,8
13%
215
37,7
9%
341
28,7
38%
25.75
1673
14
205
11
106
8
157
-
236
2
25.19
Chees. lambs. beef. honey
and vegetables and brandy.
NA
Crop. vegetables and
fruits and livestock
Animal breeding and fruit
production
25,34
30,21
30,79
Not well connected with
important and big centers
because of bad land
configuration and quality of
roads and border crossings.
22,75
17,88
25,32
Good access to processing
and distribution of forest
fruits and medicinal herbs
28,94
24,75
7,85
Good access to market
with 3 border crossings
and important corridors.
23,90
96,02
17,40
Good access to market
due to a good road
connection with main
traffic corridors.
Only for private use. no
significant agriculture
production aside form
fish production which is
relatively new business
with no official data.
15,53
43,71
6,26
Bad access to market due
to bad road infrastructure
Bosilegrad
Bujanovac
Trgoviste
0.56
0.54
Surdulica
0.74
0.65
/
268
Crna Trava
0.41
STARO NAGORICANE
RANKOVCE
KRIVA PALANKA
Municipal Assembly – Total
35, W-8.
Bulgarian (70.9%)
Serbs (13.2%)
Serbs (98.5%)
Macedonian (0.4%)
Albanian (54.7%)
Serbs (34.1%)
Serbs (82.4%)
Roma people (9.5%)
303
Serbs (98.7%)
Bulgarian (0.3%)
Macedonians 97%
Roma 1.4%
Macedonians 96%
Roma 3.2%
•
•
Civil Society structure.
describe. list most
important or most active
in the field of agr.
Environment. culture.
tourism… (NGO.
kulturno umetnicka
drustva. asocijacije. koje i
sta rade)
Historical monuments
Yugoslavs (2.9%)
Macedonian (0.4%)
“Pinus-environmental
protection
“Radilica”- Beekeepers
association
„Bosilegrad”- Culture-Art
Society
“CARIBROD” -Cultureinformation center for
Bulgarian national minority
1.Vasil Levski monument
Condition
andfunctionality
ofCultural Heritage da li
se koriste. jesu li u
upotrebljivom stanju
Low utilization of cultural
heritage. but there are
several different cultural
event which are organized
every year. mainly by
Caribrod.
Dependence ratio (population less than
15+population over 65)/population 16-65)
Share of population 65+ years old on
total population
Share of population up to 15
Aging ration (population up to
15/population 65+)
Educational structure of population over
15
•
Primary
•
Secondary
•
High
•
Without or incomplete
% of agricultural population
Other if relevant ….
Who were partners in
preparation of strategic
documents
Bosilegrad
Draft of Development
Strategy
UNDP. public sector.
private sector. NGO and
individuals from different
backgrounds.
Are there the following institutions:
Development Agency
Office for local economic
(local/regional)
development
Roma people (8.9%)
Macedonian (0.1%)
Folk dance ensemble
Jehona. Vuk Karadzic. Kolo
and Zifikar Bajramovic
none
-
Bosilegrad
HUMAN
INSTITUTIONAL
Strategies adopted (No. or
list some most important)
Bulgarian (0.2%)
Albanian (0.1%)
none
Folklore dances and
traditional outfits
Annually there is several
culture manifestations
0.61
0.60
22.73
14.80
0.65
27.95
24.95
7.11
10.87
19.18
The Centre for the
Development of the
Jablanica and Pcinja
Districts
Office for local economic
development
Yugoslavs (0.1%)
Russian (0.1%)
Mountain-bicycle union
Orlovac
Hunting union Crna Trava
Union of bee keepers
NGO- Sokolica
Monuments – Ratko Pavlovic
and spomen cesma
Turkish tower
Not sufficiently used and
maintained
Monument of warriors from
Crna Trava
Bujanovac
Trgoviste
Trgoviste
Draft of Development
Strategy
Bulgarian (4.5%)
Yugoslavs (0.5%)
Folk dance ensemble Vlasina
and 1 maj
Union of painters Iskon
Theatre Barija
No proper maintenance and
almost no utilization of
cultural heritage. It is not
mentioned in development
strategy.
Surdulica
Crna Trava
0.61
0.50
0.77
17.75
9.96
16.36
35.93
19.38
1.09
27.14
2.72
16.71
1.02
7.92
0.22
33.02
26.01
2.84
15.28
19.93
38.08
17.94
3.99
14.65
19.09
23.90
33.43
6.95
11.32
3.02
25.00
18.31
3.73
20.85
6.01
Bujanovac
Strategy of long term
development of south of
Serbia- Presevo. Bujanovac
and Medvedja
UNDP. public sector.
private sector. NGO and
individuals from different
backgrounds.
Presevo and Bujanovac
development agency
Office for local economic
Surdulica
Strategic development plan
of Municipality Surudulica
2007-2011. Strategic plan
for sustainable development
2009-2019
UNDP. public sector.
private sector. NGO and
individuals from different
backgrounds.
Exchange 2.
Office for local economic
development
304
Serbs 0.4%
Crna Trava
Municipality Strategic
Action Plan for 2004-06.
And Action plan for
economic development (in
co-operation with CHF).
Strategic development plan
of Municipality Crna Trava
2007-2011
UNDP. public sector.
private sector. NGO and
individuals from different
backgrounds.
No
STARO
NAGORICANE
RANKOVCE
KRIVA
PALANKA
50.94
28.35
43.79
7.00
20.77
STARO NAGORICANE
RANKOVCE
KRIVA PALANKA
Regional Chamber of
commerce
Business Incubators
Other if relevant
List implemented CBC
projects (
Whether the municipality
has a website
whether it has a bilingual
website. including minority
languages
whether there is an option
on the site where citizens
can ask questions
Other if relevant ….
No
No
development.
No
no
/
1 Project.
No
/
/
No
Tourist organization.
/
http://www.bosilegrad.rs/
http://www.trgoviste.rs/
Bulgarian and English
no
http://www.bujanovacinfo.o
rg/
yes
No. but there is an e-mail
address of the municipality
No
yes
No
No
No
Tourist organization
5 Projects, Tran
municipality.
http://www.surdulica.org/
No
/
/
English
http://www.opstina
crnatrava.org.rs/
-
No
-
Most heterogeneous
municipality. concerning
the ethnic structure of
population. On the territory
of thismunicipality
morethan8nationsarereprese
nted.
-
305
(3) DINARA Region
PHYSICAL
B.Grahovo
Position peripherality/cent
rality
isolated
Peripheral part of Zadar County-border with Bosnia and Herzegovina
Is it close to
coastal zone?
<100 km
Yes
Cca-70 km from
Gračac to coast
Cca 15.%
% of agricultural
land in total area
% of forestry land
Qualitative
characteristics of
soil
Prevailing climate
61,11
37,89
karsts fields, shallow soil,
Glamoč
Kupres
Livno
Tomislavgrad
Prozor
550 to 1200
m, Mountain
peaks: Veliki
bat 1851,
Šator 1872
National parks,
Nature parks,
protected area
no
hunting ground
500 km2, ,
deer, roe
deer,
chamois,
hare,
partridge,
wild ducks,
bears, wolves,
wild boars,
tetreb, fox,
lynx
Gračac
30,44
58,79
64,92
79,84
23,83
44,96
90,06
41,42
28,96
27,59
22,94
48,41
400-1950,
Mountain peaks:
Jadovnik 1950
882 - 952 m;
Mountain peak
Cincar 2006,
Vitorog 1910, ,
Golija 1890,
not organized, but there are resources
similar like in Grahovo
1200 m,
Mountain
peak: Idovac
1956m
600 km2, , 2
hunting
associations:
deer, roe deer,
chamois, hare,
partridge, wild
ducks, bears,
wolves, wild
boars, tetreb,
fox, lynx
724 m,
Mountain
peaks Troglav
1913, Cincar
2006,
Kamešnica
1856
6 hunting
grounds: deer,
roe deer,
chamois,
hare,
partridge,
wild ducks,
bears, wolves,
wild boars,
tetreb, fox,
lynx, badgers,
pine martens,
woodcock
Knin
Yes
Cca 60 km from
Knin to coast
Cca 40%
Sinj
Yes cca 36 km from
Sinj to coast
26%
Kijevo
Civljane
Located peripherally in
Šibenik-knin county,
on Dinara mountain,
64 km northeast from
Šibenik
Yes
Located peripherally
in Šibenik-knin
county, 61 km
northeast from
Šibenik
60,3 % (Šibenik-knin county)
Cca 60%40%
58%
Karst area with good background for agriculture, mostly livestock,
organic production.
Approximately 25% (Šibenik-knin county)
Nonsuitable for intensive agriculture
moderately
warm and
humid
200 - 1500m;
Mountain
peaks: Idovac
1956
Mountain continental climate +
mediterranean and submediterranean
climate
560 m ,
220 m in valleys
Peak “Ćelavac”
Highest peak
1207m
=>Dinara 1831
Continental climate
Submediterranean and continental
320 m, highest peak
“Dinara” 1831 m and
“Visoka” 890 m
Avrg. 500 meters
(mountain peak Dinara
(1831m) and Svilaja
(1509m)
Nature park:
Blidinje-
no
National park
“Biokovo” in SplitDalmatia County 5060 km to the nearest
point where
“Biokovo” is,
“Cetina” river.
National park „Krka”, river Cetina springs,
Čikola Canyon and Krčić
851km2, deer, roe
deer, chamois,
hare, partridge,
wild ducks, bears,
wolves, wild boars,
tetreb, fox, lynx,
badgers, pine
martens, woodcock
deer, roe
deer,
chamois,
hare,
partridge,
wild ducks,
bears, wolves,
wild boars,
tetreb, fox,
lynx, badgers,
pine martens,
woodcock
Municipality is 70
National park
km from well
“Krka” source of
known national
river Krka with lot
park “Plitvička
of waterfalls,
jezera” in Lika
Nature park
Senj County.
Waterfall “Krčić”,
Nature Park:
Mountain “Dinara”
“Velebit”
Cave:”Gospodaska
Others: Cerovačke
pećina”, Lakes:
pećine, sources of
“Burumska jezera”,
rivers Una,
“Šarena jezera”
Zrmanja, Krka,
Otuča, rivers
Dabašnica,
Srebrenica, lakes:
Babića jezero,
Štikada.
Yes there is a good potential
Yes, river Una
river Cetina
Yes in Split,
continental climate, strong winters and hot summers
Average high
above sea level
(Mountain peak if
exists)
Rafting spots
Spa centers
Drvar
890 (600-1200);
Mountain peaks:
Veliki Vran 2074,
Velika Ljubuša
1794
no
no
306
Yes, river Krka
In Šibenik and
Avrg. 400 meters
(mountain peak
Dinara (1831m) and
Svilaja (1509m)
Several hunting grounds with several wild game
species (chamois, wild boar, wild rabbit, fox,…)
Rivers Krka and Cetina
Vini
ca
Vodice (60 km
from Knin)
Caves
Geothermal
waters
Other relevant…
big caves
ledenica,
Čađavica
2 well known
Bastasi i Titova
pećina
many, but not
investigated
no
Makarska, Brač
(island) and some
other places
Yes, Cave
”Kravarica”-ancient
history
Yes,”Cerovačka
špilja”, 1295 m
Yes,“Gospodaska
pećina”, 3060 m
Golubinjka, Krmnica, Orlovača, Kranjska cave,
Čulum cave, Validžić cave, Cicvarić cave,
Slavić cave, Stražarska cave
-
-
Knin
Sinj
Reconstructed buildings devastated in War
Kijevo
good housing conditions, but without specific architectonic
characteristics
Gračac
War devastated
area
Old buildings that
need reconstruction
Reconstructed buildings devastated in War, old
buildings, some of them need reconstruction
Ethnographic
Museum, the
old castle
Prozor
(national
monumens),
franciskan
monastery
(national
monument),
Ramski križ
(cross), Raduša
mountain (bike
path)
Cave: Cerovačke
špilje
Source of river
Zrmanja, Remains
of castle
“Zvonigrad”
Church St. Juraj
Martyr, Old
Croatian Town
“Otuča”,
Franciscan
Monastery
Cave:”Gospodaska
pećina”, Lakes:
“Burumska jezera”,
“Šarena jezera”,
Fortress of Knin,
Podgrađe-medieval
residential complex,
Benedictine monastery
with a church of St.
Bartholomew
“Kapitul”, “Hill-fort of
Topolje”, “Fortress of
Bračići”, “Villa rustica
in Orlić”- ancient villa
from 2nd century,
“Biskupija”archaeological site,
Franciscan Monastery
St. Ante
Mostly devastated in Independence
War, there was some reconstruction,
but more is needed
Monastery
Monastery Krka,
Krka,
Franciscan
Franciscan
monastery Visovac,
monastery
Bishopric by Knin,
Visovac,
Knin fortress,
Bishopric by
church of st.
Knin, Knin
Salvation on Cetina
fortress,
spring, Glavaš
church of st.
fortress
Salvation on
Cetina spring,
Glavaš
fortress
wood carving
Ornamental
Weving, traditional
ceramic articlescups made of wood
most known“Bukare” other
Ceramic Sheep of
wooden artifacts.
Lika- “Lička
keramička ovčica”,
weaving
Mountain Dinara tradition-Livestock
production- mostly sheep, cheese processing of
fish, honey, wooden artifacts.
no
excellent resources for fishery:
one glacial
two natural lakes
lake, artificial
lake Zupica,
river Unac
HERITAGE
built
environment,
quality of
housing,
architecture,
monuments
and
landmarks
B. Grahovo
traditional
handicrafts
wood carving
Local
heritage,
most
important
feature
very specific way of
singing and design,
beautifull national
costume, house of
Gavrilo Princip
1 glacial lake,2
natural lakes, 2
artificial lakes,
3 rivers and
number of
small water
sources
Drvar
Glamoč
3 glacial lakes,
river Mrtvica,
Milač,
Vodenica
rivers
Bistrica,
Žabljak,
Struba,
artificial lakes
Buško Blato,
2 glacial lakes
Kupres
Livno
59% of housing is still demolished (war actions)
very poor, still not reconstructed after war
Šatorsko jezero (glacial
lake), caves Ledenica
and Čađavica,
Momčilova kula
(Medieval Bosnia),
roman setlemen in
Mramorje (city of
Stridon), prehistoric
settlemnts (nation of
Dicion - 4)
Titova pećina,
Cave Bstasi,
Ortodox
monastery
Rmanj, river
Unac Canyon,
Pipovljani
(Medieval
Bosnia),
Šipovljani
roman
setllement,
Oštrelj mountin
peak, II WW
very specific
way of singing
and design,
beautifull
national
Old city Glamoč,
roman sttlements
(4 of them)
crkvine (remains
of chrch or other
buildings) stećci
(grave stones 500
of them), pre
historical
settlemnts
very specific way
of singing and
design, beautifull
national costume,
rivers Šuica, the
bigest artificial lake
Buško Blato,
Blidinje glacial
lake
Trobrodna
crkva (15
century),
Stećci (grave
stones), city
Stržan
Old Bistrički city,
Kasalov gradac,
Fanciskans
muzeum and
galery, Veis kula,
Firdusova kula,
Pirijina kula, mills
-
stone graving
Tomislavgrad
Christian
basilica (6
century);
Masna Luka,
Diva
Grabovčeva,
stećci (grave
stones),
muzeum,
nature park
Blidinje
river sRama,
Ramsko lake
and Raduša
lake
Prozor
hand-mowing the grass, horse racing, very specific way of singing and design,
beautiful national costume
307
Cave “Kravarica”ancient history,
Franciscan and Town
Museum, “Sinjska
alka”- the knight
competition,
organized every year
for the remembrance
of the glorious
victory of the people
of Sinj,
Pilgrimages Ascension - Velika
Gospa- symbol of
Sinj and Cetina
district=>Miracle
Painting of Bless
Virgin Mary of
Mercy, lot of Old
Towns, citadels in
Sinj and countryside.
Waving, wooden
artifacts
Heritage of
“Dalmatian Zagora”
meaning-“behind
hills", which is a
reference to the fact
Traditional
housebuilding
(stone houses,
stonewalls,..)
Traditional
dance
„Kijevsko
kolo”, Kijevo
folk costume
Civljane
Traditional
housebuilding
(stone houses,
stonewalls,…)
costume, very
know II world
war battle
desant na Drvar
1 hotel,
poor
devastated,
accommodation
some
conditions
accommodation
at mountain
Oštrelj
it is accessible by rail and bus, the firs airport is in Split (130 km)
good
accommodatio
n at Winter
center, 1 hotel
and 26
apartments
Typical
products
specific cheese and meat products, honey,
wild plants
specific cheese
and meat
products,
honey, wild
plants
Health
services
no any
Educational
system – no,
childcare
services,
types of
secondary
schools,
only 1 primary school
Universities,
institutes
(list)
no any
Hotels,
accommodati
on quality,
capacities
accessibility
by air/rail
Quality of
infrastructur
e
Local roads
1 hotel, devastated, no
any accommodation
166 km, 30% of poor
local rads
0,53
two primary
schools and 1
secondary
school
172 km, 25% of
poor local roads
Glamoč potato
(specific taste),
specific cheese
and meat
products, honey,
wild plants
0,42
1 primary school
and 1 secondary
school
185 km, 43% of
local roads
0,50
3 primary
schools and 1
secondary
school
150 km, 35%
of local roads
one hotel
3 hotels, and
5 motels, 661
beds, ski
center
Blidinje
accommodation
conditions are
good, one hotel
and 5 B&B
1hotel 2 stars,
several private
accommodation
places
1 hotel-2stars, several
private accommodation
places
it is accessible
by bus, the firs
airport is in
Sarajevo and
Mostar
Zadar airoport-65
km, bus station,
car, rail station
By car, bus and rail
stations, nearest airport
in Zadar 110km, but no
connection with main
highway
Cheese,
ornamental
ceramic articles
0,78
Plum brandy,
plums, sheep:
Cigaja and
Pramenka,
specific cheese
and meat
products,
honey, wild
plants
0,50
22 primary
schools and 2
secondary
schools
18 primary
schools and one
secondary
school
sheep: Cigaja and Pramenka, specific
cheese and meat products, honey,
wild plants
1,44; regional
hospital
26 primary schools
and 4 secondary
schools
217 km, 20% of
local roads
249 km, 45%
of local roads
308
472 km, 1/3 of
regional and
magistral roads
that it is the part of
Dalmatia that is not
coastal, shepherd
heritage, sheep, goat,
milk cheese
production.
2 hotels-3 stars, 1
pension, other private
accommodation
No hotels, low quality
By car, bus and rail
stations, main routes
with other cities are
in the center of town
Sinj, which is good
for connection but
bad for traffic
quality.
Honey, wooden artifacts, weaving artifacts,
paving stones, fish production (trout)
Good access
by air (two
international
airports in
proximity
(Split 80km,
Zadar 130km)
2 ambulances
1 hospital 1 health
center, 1 red cross, 1
emergency service
1 health center, 1
emergency service
2 primary schools,
secondary school
for economists,
auto-mechanics,
forestry technician,
machinists and
plumbers, 1
kindergarten,
2 primary schools, 1
secondary school with
programs for 10
different technical
avocations and 1
secondary school with
general gymnasium,
language gymnasium,
economists, seller and
agricultural technician,
1 kindergarten
5 primary schools, 6
kindergartens, 4
secondary schools (2
gymnasiums, 2
schools for different
technical
avocations), 1
alternative schoolnight school.
University of
Zadar with limited
number of faculties
University of Zadar,
Associate degree
college Knin with
programs for
agriculture in karst
area, food processing
and trade and
innovation.
University of Split
with almost all
faculties
General hospital Šibenik, general
hospital Knin, medical centre in
Šibenik and in Knin, 1 doctor / 1585
inabitants (Šibenik-knin county level
data)
30 kinder
30 kinder gardens,
gardens, 25
25 elementary
elementary
schools, 28
schools, 28
elementary schools
elementary
with 4 grades, 13
schools with
secondary schools
4 grades, 13
(10 in Šibenik, 2 in
secondary
Knin and 1 in
schools (10 in
Drniš),
Šibenik, 2 in
Knin and 1 in
Drniš),
2 associate2 associate-degree
degree
colleges
colleges
(Veleučilište u
(Veleučilište
Šibeniku,
u Šibeniku,
Veleučilište Marka
Veleučilište
Marulića u Kninu)
Marka
Marulića u
Kninu)
Good road network, reconstructed roads, some of the roads need
improvement
Good access by air
(two international
airports in
proximity (Split
80km, Zadar
130km)
Traditional ham (pršut), pancetta,
goat and sheep cheese (sir iz mišine)
Low quality
of roads in
outback areas
of Šibenikknin county
(Kijevo
Low quality of
roads in outback
areas of Šibenikknin county
(Civljane among
them)
very bad quality of all infrastructure, there no money to invest in reconstruction, but still there is water accumulation and
wastewater lagoon
Electricity,
water,
sewage…
B. GRAHOVO
ECONOMIC
131,71
GDP munic./ GDP national
DRVAR
GLAMOČ
50,98
KUPRES
84,46
134,23
LIVNO
electro supply
is good, but
water supply is
poor, sewerage
is not
developed
TOMISLAVGR
AD
86,53
PROZOR
59,20
57,33
GDP structure (regional/zupanija level if does not exist on municipality
Good electricity
network, water
supply is not
sufficient, water
infrastructure is old
and needs
reconstruction,
sewage system
exists partially and
needs improvement
among them)
Electrical exists, but is in a low
quality status, water management and
sewage systems are non-existable
Electricity, informatics equipment needs
improvement especially in business area, sewage
exists partially
Gračac
Knin
Sinj
Kijevo
Civljane
3.3%-for Zadar
County
1.3%-ŠibenikKnin County
It is 76,4% of
national GDP
level.
It is 76,4% of
national GDP
level.
Zadar County
Šibenik-Knin
County
3.6%- SplitDalmatia
County
Split-Dalmatia
County
·
Primary
7.60**
7.60**
7.60**
7.60**
7.60**
7.60**
7.60**
6.4%
4.3%
2.7%
4,80%
4,80%
·
Secondary
20.85**
20.85**
20.85**
20.85**
20.85**
20.85**
20.85**
22.2%
23.7%
25.9%
26,68%
26,68%
·
Tertiary
32.9**
32.9**
32.9**
32.9**
32.9**
32.9**
32.9**
53.6%
51%
53.2%
57%
57%
·
Public
38.65**
38.65**
38.65**
38.65**
38.65**
38.65**
38.65**
17.8%
21%
18.2%
23,55%
23,55%
Tourism, peat
coal, brick
production and
agriculture
agriculture and tourism and forestry
Livestock
production,
organic
production,
recreational
tourism
Recreational
tourism,
organic
production,
cheese
production,
processing of
mineral stones
93.5% - SplitDalmatian
County
1. Processing industry
2. Trade
3. Tourism
Most important sectors
identified in local
development strategies
Wages/national average
(BH=100%)
HDI or poverty rates if
exists (if not describe
situation at national level)
Big players, companies,
structure of enterprises,
profile (describe and list
mort important)
106,08
84.8%-Zadar
County
Plaster stone
processing,
recreational
tourism,
organic
production,
livestock
production
86.7%-ŠibenikKnin County
There is no data about poverty line or level of poverty at municipality level. Anyhow the last investigations suggest that 17%
of population in B&H lives under the poverty level. Having in mind that big part of population have relatives in EU or USA it
is expected that situation is a little bit better then in rest of B&H.. It very important to outline that almost 1/3 of population
lives very near to the poverty border, so any worsening of economic situation will push them under the poverty line.
Brickyard,
n/a
n/a
n/a
Mining
Kapis
n/a
forestry, nursery,
companie
(production of
Separacija Pržine
s, Dairy
cables), Violeta
-gravel
Livno,
(paper), Farm
separation,
Suša,
Tomislav,
Ždralovac - peat
perkovićAgroman, Dolac,
Development
index8=57.06
for Gračac
Development
index= 65.46
for Knin
Development
index= 81.22
for Sinj
“Noclerius”fishery
Knauf from
Austria –
processing of
plaster stone,
DIV-metal
industry,
Cetina d.d.building
industry
Ciglana d.d.building
material
114,30
75,44
92,53
mining (coal),
agriculture and
tourism
97,47
102,91
90,13
77% of
national
average
(Šibenik-knin
county data,
2009)
Vini
ca
77% of national
average (Šibenikknin county data,
2009)
TLM – TVP d.o.o., Šibenik (rolled
metal alloys,…);
Knauf d.o.o., Knin (construction
materials)
DIV d.o.o., Knin (steel toll parts,
heavy machinery parts,…);
8
Development index in Croatia includes indicators as follows: income per capita, unemployment rate, income of public budget, population trends, and education rate. There are 5 groups of units (municipalities, cities, counties): I. Group= below 75% of Croatian average, II. Group= 75-100%
of Croatian average, III. Group= 100%-125% of Croatian average, IV. Group= above 125% of Croatian average
309
coal
NO of firms/1000
inhabitants
95
56
73
95
49
50
37
3.31
Agroturistic
cooperative
Knin-assists
connection
between local
products and
tourism
3.75
Self-employment rate as
percentage of labour force
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
15.2%
7.6%
8.9%
Data not available
17,7
9,7
14,7
21,8
12,6
18,4
8,5
36%-Zadar
County
33%-ŠibenikKnin County
38% SplitDalmatia
County
34.5**
34.5**
34.5**
34.5**
34.5**
34.5**
34.5**
28.5%-County
38.8%-County
41.0%-County
27% (2,07% of
total national
employment
rate)
44% (Šibenik-knin county level data)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
6.7%
9.6%
1.84%
27 % (on Šibenik-knin county level,
even worse on municipality level)
40,8
50,3
45,8
35,9
47,6
50,3
55,4
19% Zadar
County
21.7%-ŠibenikKnin County
21,7%
-
3.1
22.6
22%-SplitDalmatia
County
67.8
animal
production,
cattle, sheep
Cheese
production, fish
processing,
cabbage, potato
Honey,
vegetables,
cereal
production for
breeding, goat
and sheep
production,
cheese
production.
Employment rate%
Female employment rate
Share of adult social welfare
beneficiaries on total labour
force
Unemployment rate
Puđa
-
-
-
4.8
14,49 firms/1000 inhabitants
(Šibenik-knin county data)
-
Most important
sectors/products of
agriculture
animal production, cattle, sheep
Cattle/arable land
0.29*
0.29*
0.29*
0.29*
0,37
2,55
0.29*
Total
cattle=488
Total
cattle=349
Honey, cereal
production for
breeding, goat
and sheep
production,
cured meat
production-pig
production,
cheese
production.
Total
cattle=1190
Pigs/sown area
0.95*
0.95*
0.95*
0.95*
0,17
4,25
0.95*
Total pigs=386
Total
pigs=1087
Sheep/agr. land
0.88*
0.88*
0.88*
0.88*
0,69
10,62
0.88*
Total
sheep=243
Total
sheep=310
SOCIAL
-
Solaris d.d., Šibenik (hotel resort)
Farm agricultural
mechanization
access to market for
agricultural products/food
processing industry
-
Agroplast
animal production, cattle,
sheep, fodder
very poor
not so organized,
but better then in
rest of region
B. GRAHOVO
DRVAR
GLAMOČ
KUPRES
LIVNO
not well
organized
TOMISLAV
GRAD
PROZOR
310
23,12
9,04 (pedestrian
(pedestrian
controlled + twin
controlled +
shaft tractors)
twin shaft
tractors)
Traditional ham (pršut), goat and
sheep cheese (sir iz mišine), red wine
(babić), olive oil
3206
heads/32713 ha
3206
heads/32713 ha
Total
pigs=5344
Negligible
Negligible
Total sheep=78
72095
heads/134875
ha (pastures
and meadows)
Proximity of
big cities
(capital,
Zagreb, is 320
km distant,
Split 80 km
distant)
72095
heads/134875 ha
(pastures and
meadows)
Proximity of big
cities (capital,
Zagreb, is 320
km distant, Split
80 km distant)
Bad connection between production and marketunarranged market access need to be improved by
domestic food supply to tourists, especially because of
position near the coast
n/a
Women 15-40/ men 15-50 years
21,7%
Gračac
Knin
Sinj
Kijevo
Civljane
63.4%
71.0%
65.7%
72 (women,
data from
2001)/
3 (women, data
from 2001)/
9 (men, data from
97 (men, data
from 2001) =
0,7422
(74,22%)
Any other issue relevant for gender
balance
Figures on women participation in
unemployed population
n/a
42,86
51,52
53,11
59,95
49,87
15 NGO,
only 5 are
focused on
issues of
civil society
45,94
45,76
Ethical groups, minorities
Civil Society structure, describe, list
most important or most active in the
field of agr. Environment, culture,
tourism… (NGO, kulturno umetnicka
drustva, asocijacije, koje i sta rade)
12 NGOs,
focused on
humanitarian
work and spoor
few NGO mostly
focused on
humanitarian
work
17NGO mostly
focused on
humanitarian
work
10 NGO,
only 3 are
focused on
issues
regardin
civil society
Historical monuments
Gavriolo Princip
- bhirthplace,
Momčilova kula
(Medieval
Bosnia), roman
setlemen in
Mramorje (city of
Stridon),
prehistoric
settlemnts (nation
of Dicion - 4)
Titova pećina,
Ortodox
monastery
Rmanj, river
Unac Canyon,
Pipovljani
(Medieval
Bosnia),
Šipovljani roman
setllement,
Oštrelj mountin
peak, II WW
Old city
Glamoč, roman
sttlements (4 of
them) crkvine
(remains of
chrch or other
buildings)
stećci (grave
stones 500 of
them), pre
historical
settlemnts
Trobrodna
crkva (15
century),
stećci
(grave
stones), city
Stržan
9 NGO,
focused on
culture andd
sport
13 NGO, only
2 are dealing
with issues of
civil society
Cristian
bazilika (6
century);
Mmasna
Luka, Diva
Grabovčeva,
stećci (grave
stones),
muzeum,
nature park
Blidinje
Ethnographic
Museum, the
old castle
Prozor
(national
monumens),
franciskan
monastery
(national
monument),
Ramski križ
(cross),
Raduša
mountin (bike
311
-
-
-
NGO of women
“Prospero” implementing a
program of women
self-employment by
producing souvenirs
and other handcrafts
that are being sold at
national parks, nature
parks and other
touristic destinations
in the region.
Croats 57.6%
Serbs 38.8%
KUD “Šokadija i
prijatelji”preservation of
traditional dances,
NGO “Starohrvatska
župa Otuča” – –
connection between
nowadays and
tradition, Croatian
cultural society
“Napredak”-branch
office in Gračaccultural and
educational activities,
economical
strengthening and
social boosting of
Croatian population,
NGO “Una”promotion of healthy
life and
environmental
friendly awareness,
NGO “Kraljica
Katarina”-assistance
in housing for exiles
from Bosnia and
Herzegovina,
miscellaneous
veterans associations.
Old cities from
Medieval (Karlović,
Obljajac, Sv.Petar,
Gubčevo polje,
Hotuča, Tujin vrh,
Bujiča kuk, Otrić,
Rakovnik), Church
St. Juraj, Remains of
old city “Zvonigrad”,
Old City Otuča,
Francirean Monastry
ect.
NGO of women
“Tkanica”preservation of
traditional
handicraft-weving
NGO-Club of
Women Sinjsociety for
fighting breast
cancer, woman as
a chief of police,
woman as a
major deputy
Croats 76.5%
Serbs 20.8%
NGO of women
“Tkanica”preservation of
traditional
handicraft-weving
6, 7 societies for
helping exservicemen
unemployment ect.
NGO “ZvoniMir”expert assistance,
partnership in EU
projects for
employment,
protection of
human rights,
helping drug addict
people, protection
of consumer rights,
miscellaneous
veterans
associations
Croats 98.4%
Others 1.6%
NGO “SRMA”association for
civil society and
quality of life, 4
KUDs-traditional
dances, other 16
cultural NGOs,
economic 10
NGOs=>beekeep
ing, craftsmen
association,
mushroom
growing ect,
miscellaneous
veterans
associations
Fortress of Knin,
Podgrađe-medieval
residential
complex,
Benedictine
monastery with a
church of St.
Bartholomew
“Kapitul”, “Hillfort of Topolje”,
“Fortress of
Bračići”, “Villa
rustica in Orlić”ancient villa from
“Sinjska alka”the most known
event and symbol
of Sinj, knight
tournament
which has been
held every first
Sunday in the
month of August
in town of Sinj,
Croatia since
1715,
Church of Our
Lady of Sinj,
KUD Dinara
1. remains of
Glavaš fortress
2. church of st.
Spas
3. remains of
Franciscan
monastery and
(probably)
church of st.
Marko
2001) = 0,3333
(33,33%)
Croats 29,20%
Serbs 68,61%
Data not
available
1. church of st.
Spas
path)
Condition and functionality of Cultural
Heritage
no
very poor
it is
accessible,
but not well
maintained
it is accessible, but there is no
supporting facilities
it is well
maintained,
but there is no
supporting
facilities
Some of them are
useful, many of them
need reconstruction
and proper
preservation
Zadar County
2,092
Crime rates?
HUMAN
B. GRAHOVO
DRVAR
GLAMOČ
KUPRES
LIVNO
TOMISLAVGRAD
PROZOR
2nd century,
Old City-middle
“Biskupija”aged citadel,
archaeological site,
Kamičak- hill in
Franciscan
the center of Sinj
Monastery St.
with defense
Ante,
walls, tower and
Serbian orthodox
clock.
monastery Krka
dedicated to the
Archangel Michael
They are useful, some of them needs
reconstruction
Šibenik-Knin
County
2,064
Some are
useful, but
almost all need
detailed
reconstruction
and restoration
Reconstruction
and restoration is
needed
Split-Dalmatian
County
1,570
Gračac
Knin
Sinj
Kijevo
Civljane
0.72
0.62
0.50
1,03
1,53
Dependence ratio (population less
than 15+population over
65)/population 16-65)
0,71
0,66
0,67
0,64
0,51
0,05
0,44
Share of population 65+ years old
on total population
36,44
31,98
30,00
21,30
18,70
2,55
12,89
41.9%
38.3%
33.1%
40,52 %
(2001. data)
57,1% (2001.
data)
Share of population up to 15
5,00
7,78
10,21
17,72
14,98
2,08
17,70
18.2%
23.8%
21.2%
10,31%
(2001. data)
1,4% (2001.
data)
Aging ration (population up to
15/population 65+)
0,14
0,24
0,34
0,83
0,80
0,82
1,37
0.8
1.7
1.8
0,25
0,02
Data on
Šibenik-knin
level
17,96%
·
Primary
41.7%**
19.7%
23.6
18.1%
Data on
Šibenik-knin
level
17,96%
·
Secondary
49.9%**
38.7%
49.3%
53.6%
18,1%
18,1%
·
High
8.4%**
4.8%
8.1%
8.8%
9,45%
9,45%
·
Without
10.7%
6.6%
4.7%
24,59%
(6,24% were
in primary
school for 1-3
years, 10,46%
4-7 years)
24,59%
(6,24% were
in primary
school for 1-3
years, 10,46%
4-7 years)
4.3%
0.8%
1.9%
Educational structure of
population over 15
% of agricultural population
26%**
INSTITUTIONAL
B.
GRAHOV
O
DRVAR
GLAMOČ
KUPRES
LIVNO
TOMISLAVGR
AD
PROZOR
Gračac
Knin
Sinj
Kijevo
Civljane
Strategies adopted (No,
or list some most
important)
Strategical
plan of
municipalit
Strategy of
municipality
Drvar
Strategical
plan of
development
no
Strategy of
developmen
t of
n/a
Strategy of
agriculture
development
Plan of Spatial
Development of
Town,
Plan of Spatial
Development of
Town,
Plan of Spatial
Development of
Town,
Plan of Spatial
Planning (in
preparation);
Plan of Spatial
Planning; Plan of
overall
312
Who were partners in
preparation of strategic
documents
y Grahovo
developmen
t 2005-2010
Development
2008 - 2013
Yes
Are there the following institutions:
no
Development Agency
(local/regional)
Yes
of
municipality
Glamoč 20102015, Strategy
for youth
Yes
-
Yes
no
no
no
no
municipalit
y Livno:
2008-2015
2005-2010
Developmental
Strategy of Zadar
County
Developmental
Strategy of
Šibenik-Knin
County
Developmental
Strategy of SplitDalmatian County
Developmental
Strategy of Šibenikknin county
-
Yes
All local
stakeholdersZADRADevelopment
Agency
All local
stakeholders,
Development
Agency in Šibenik
All local
stakeholders,
Development
Agency in Split
All local
stakeholders;
Development
Agency in Šibenik
no
no
Yes “ZADRA”Development
Agency-in the
County
Yes in Šibenik
Yes in Split “RERA
SD”
Yes, in Šibenik
Yes Split-Dalmatian
County chamber of
commerce
Yes in SplitDalmatian County
there are several
incubators
In Split-Dalmatian
County there is also
Center of support to
business and craft
and Chamber of craft
Split-Dalmatian
County with border
countries
=IPA programAdriatic coast CBC,
IPA with Bosnia and
Herzegovina,
IPA with
Montenegro,
Transnational
program
“Mediterranean”
with Italy,
Transnational
cooperation with
Southeastern Europe
Yes šibenik-Knin
County chamber of
commerce
Yes, in Šibenik
Yes, but it needs
improvement
No, but there is
possibility to visit
tourist web site of
Sinj in English
ONLY!
yes
Yes
Regional Chamber of
commerce
no
Business Incubators
no
Other if relevant
Cantonal government and cantonal touristic agency
List implemented CBC
projects (topic, partners)
-
-
-
-
IPA adriatic
A3 net
-
whether the municipality
has a website
whether it has a bilingual
website, including
minority languages
Yes
under
construction
Yes
-
Yes
Yes
whether there is an
option on the site where
citizens can ask questions
Yes
Yes
=>EU CARDS
project “Una
Avanturizam”Gračac with Bosnia
and Herzegovinasupporting
sustainable
development and
recreational
tourism beside
river Una
=>EU IPA-CBC
“Una-Vrelo
života”continuation of
CARDS project
=>SIPA
„Strengthening of
Institutions for
protected areas"with Italy-also
restructuring the
environment beside
river Una
Yes, but it needs
improvement
EU CARDS
“Establishment of
an eco-agricultural
laboratory analysis
and monitoring
unit”-city of Knin
and Bosnia and
Herzegovina
(Livno, Drvar)
Yes, but it needs
improvement
no
n/a
Yes
-
Yes
Yes
Yes
313
Yes
yes
development;
Developmental
Strategy of
Šibenik-knin
county
All local
stakeholders;
Consulting firms;
Development
Agency in Šibenik
Yes, in Šibenik
Yes
No
Yes
No, not really,
there are contacts,
but no possibilities
for questions
(4) NERETVA Region
PHYSICAL
BERKOVIĆI
Position peripherality/centrality
south west, isolated
BILEĆA
Is it close to coastal
zone?
<50km
<50km
GACKO
LJUBINJE
around 120 km
around 120 km
NEVESINJE
around 120 km
TREBINJE
ČAPLJINA
southeast, isolated
south of the
country, well
connected
with roads,
railway
35 km
LJUBUŠKI
NEUM
STOLAC
RAVNO
south of
country
south west
of the
country
south of
the
country
periphery
ŠIROKI
BRIJEG
south of the
country
20
25 km
on
seaside
40
10 km
25 km
PLOČE
Peripherally,
on southern
part of
Dubrovnikneretva county
Yes, on coast
% of agricultural land
in total area
58,51%
60%
67,80%
52,00%
55,50%
52,00%
40,76%
43%
n/a
10,50%
n/a
20,00%
5,92%
% of forestry land
37,88%
35%
29,76%
48,68%
43,50%
43,00%
30,03%
52%
n/a
80,20%
n/a
75,00%
17,45%
Qualitative
characteristics of soil
shallow soil, carst area
shallow soil, carst area, steep
slopes and mostly brown land
314
terra rosa, alluvial, shallow
soil steep slopes
Prevailing climate
Continental Mediterranean
climate
mixture of
continental and
Mediterranean
climate
Average high above
sea level (Mountain
peak if exists)
470 t0 550 m
450 to 480
965m, Mountain peak:
Volujak 2336
500-800m,
Mountain
peak: Bjelasica
1338, Viduša
1328
National parks, Nature
parks, protected area
no
no
National park Sutjeska Mountain Zelengora with old
European forest
no
Sub Mediterranean climate
Mediterranean
climate
860m, Mountain peak: Crvnja
(1856m)
270 m, Mountain peak Ubli
1808
150m(5-550)
no
no
Nature park:
Hutovo Blato
Short elaboration, if
exists
315
200 m
0m
1 to 1110
m(Hrgud)
no
Nature park
Hutovo
Blato
mixture of
continental and
Mediterranean
climate
Mediterranean
40
Approximately
10m
50
no
no
Neretva valley
is proposed for
receiving
status of
National Park;
hunting ground
there are possibilities, but
nothing is done
one hunting
ground wild
pigs, rabbits
and birds
663.9 km2
bears, Roe deer and chamois,
wild boar,
grouse, wolf, fox, quail, ducks,
woodcock, partridge, hare
there are
possibilities,
but noting is
done
the hunting ground is not still
established officially, but there
is opportunity to hunt:
bears, roe deer and chamois,
wild boar,
grouse, wolf, fox, quail, ducks,
woodcock, partridge, hare
There is opportunity to hunt:
bears, roe deer and chamois,
wild boar,
grouse, wolf, fox, quail, ducks,
woodcock, partridge, hare
no
no
no
no
no
no
Neretva valley
is famous for
wild bird
hunting
·
Rafting spots
no
no
no
no
yes, river Neretva
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
Rafting isn’t
attractive in
this area, but
there are
several other
water sports
and activities
related to
enjoying te
Neretva river
(kitesurfing,
boardsurfing,
waterskiing,
parasailing,….
·
Spa centers
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
316
3 very attractive, but not
investigated: Ratkovača,
Sunićka, Jejinovača
no
yes, but it is not investigated
yes, but it is
not
investigated
yes, but it is not investigated
cave Sv. Pavle and well know
Vjetrenica
no
no
no
Badanj,
Tarmanjača,
Crvena
pećina,
Drenovačka
pećina
Vjetrenica,
Orlovica
no
Cave Banja
·
Geothermal
waters
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
None
Other relevant…
very nice waterfall 150 m
high - Opačice, and source
of river Bregava
very good
resources
for fishing:
artificial
lake
Bilećko,
rivers:
Trebišnica,
Vrijeka,
Vrba,
Dramešnica,
Zmajevača,
Jasenik,
Župan
very good resources for
fishing:3 artificial lakes, 6
glasial lakes at Zelengora
-
very good resources for
fishing and swimming:
Trebišnica and Jazina
there is
possibility for
nautical
tourism
(marina)
excellent
fishing
resources:
Trebižat,
Vrioštica,
Studenac,
Lukač
excellent
fishing
resources
and
resources
for
nautic
turizm
excellent
fishing
resources:
Bregava
and
Doransko
lake
·
Caves
HERITAGE
BERK
OVIĆI
BILE
ĆA
GACK
O
LJUBIN
JE
NEVESIN
JE
TREBINJ
E
ČAPLJIN
A
LJUBUŠ
KI
NEUM
STOLAC
317
RAVN
O
ŠIRO
KI
BRIJE
G
PLOČE
ZAŽAB
LJE
ŽUPA
DUBROV
AČKA
DUBROV
AČKO
PRIMORJ
E
KONAV
LE
HERC
EG
NOVI
excellent
fishing
resources:
Lištica,
Mokašnica,
Crnašnica,
Žvatić
KOTO
R
NIKŠIĆ
built
environment,
quality of
housing,
architecture,
good,
but
without
architec
tonic
specific
ity
good, old town with
specific
characteristics of
continental
Mediterranean
ambient (stone
houses)
good, but
without
specific
character
istics
good, old
town with
specific
characterist
ics of
continental
Mediterran
ean
ambient
(stone
houses )
old town
with
specific
architecto
nic
characteris
tics, good
housing
monuments and
landmarks
Old
town
Kostru
m
(nationa
l
monum
ent 10
century)
, St.
Elias
Church
(14
century)
, Chrch
Sv
Trojice
and Sv
Voznes
enija,
necropo
lis of
stećci
(Podhu
m,
Hatelji,
Dabrici)
, caves
Ratkova
Monast
ery
Dobrić
evo (12
century
),
Chrch
Sv
Ilije, 2
big
source
c od
water:
Nikšić
ko
vrelo,
vrelo
oko
Chrch Sv
Ilije (13
century),
Chrch Sv
Kneza
Lazara
(16)
century,
necropoli
s
Mramorj
a
BiH
national
monument
s: Chrch
Vasnesenij
a Presvete
Bogorodic
e, Sahat
kula, old
city
Stražić,
necropolis
Kalufi;
archeologi
cal sites:
39
prehistoric
ally sites,
31 roman,
8 middle
age
Arslanagić
a bridge,
mosques:
Sultan
Ahmedova
,
Osmanova
, Muje
Kotezije;
Monastery
: Tvrdoš
(4
century),
Duži (16
century),
Sv Petra i
Pavla (6
century),
Zavala (6
century),
old
willage
Uveća
(empty),
old city
Klobuk
Mićevac,
fortress
Strač,
Old city
Ključ,
Chrch
Sv
Nikola
(nationa
l
monume
nt 15
century)
,
Mouzol
eum in
Lipnik,
Chrch
Sv
Dimitrij
e, and
Sv
Trojice
(in the
center
of the
town 19
century)
,
necropol
is in
Slivlji,
good
quality,
except
settlement
s for
refugees
that is not
finished
and
destroyed
houses in
rural areas
settlement
Mogorjelo
, midlevel
fortress
Stolac, old
city
Počitelj,
archeologi
cal sites:
Jezero,
Desilo,
Gabela
settlement
Mogorjelo
, midlevel
fortress
Stolac, old
city
Počitelj,
archeologi
cal sites:
Jezero,
Desilo,
Gabela
good
quality,
but
without
specific
architectur
al
characteris
tics
good
quality of
housing
50% of houses is still
destroyed
good quality of housing, new
settlement
good
quality of
housing
Old city
Ljubuški,
Fanciskan
monastery
and
museum
(1884),
roman
fortress
Gračin,
Roman
Christian
basilicas(
Vojnić,
Vitina,
Priboj, C.
Grm), 45
necropolis
sites
(stećci),
Waterfalls:
Kravice
and
Koćuša
Old city
Ljubuški,
Fanciskan
monastery
and
museum
(1884),
roman
fortress
Gračin,
Roman
Christian
basilicas(
Vojnić,
Vitina,
Priboj, C.
Grm), 45
necropolis
sites
(stećci),
Waterfalls:
Kravice
and
Koćuša
necropolis
:
Brštanica,
Crkvina,
Dašnica,
Dabrovo,
Lise,
archeologi
cal sites
necropolis: Radimlja,
BiH national
monument: old city
Stolac
remains
of old
cities
(gradin
e):
Čavljan
i,
Orahov
Dol,
Golubn
ica;
Chrch
Sv
Mitra,
Sv
petra
(catholi
c
church)
Antical
city:
Mokriskika
, midieval
city: Borak,
old cristian
chrch in
Mokro (5
century),
Franciskan
monastery,
museum
and gallery
necropolis
:
Brštanica,
Crkvina,
Dašnica,
Dabrovo,
Lise,
archeologi
cal sites
necropolis
:
Radimlja,
BiH
national
monumen
t: old city
Stolac
Antical
city:
Mokris
kika,
midiev
al city:
Borak,
old
cristian
chrch
in
Mokro
(5
century
),
Francis
kan
monast
ery,
museu
m and
gallery
318
remain
s of
old
cities
(gradin
e):
Čavlja
ni,
Oraho
v Dol,
Golub
nica;
Chrch
Sv
Mitra,
Sv
petra
(cathol
ic
church
)
Medieval
tombstones; remains
of Ilir’s buildings
Good
quality of
housebuildi
ng, but got
neglected
during and
after the
War
-
-
Good
quality of
housebuil
ding; a
lot of
illegal
objects;
A lot was devastated
during the War;
rebuilding is an
ongoing process
Good
quality as
an result
of
intensive
rebuilding
due to
massive
War
destructio
n
Tradition
al stone
buildings
througho
ut entire
municipa
lity
protecte
d
national
monume
nts:
Fortress
es: Forte
Mare,
Kanli,
Arza,
building
of hotel
Plaža,
fisherma
n village
Rose,
Museum
, City
archive
protected
monument
Old city
Onogošt,
Bedem,
bridgers.
Carev,
Vukov,
Gordin,
Monestery
Sv Luka,
Church:
Orthodoks
catedral,
Crvena
stijena,
stećci
(grave
stones),
City
museum,
ski center
Vučje
Old city
is
protecte
d
monume
nt: Duke
palace,
Napoleo
n
theater,
Arsenal,
Francisc
an
monaste
ry,
Churche
s: Sv
Mihaila,
Sv
Koledul
e, Sv
Nikole,
Sv
Triumfa
, Sv
Luke,
Palace:
Buća,
Drago,
ča,
Sunićka
,
Jejinova
ča,
waterfal
l
Opačice
traditional
handicrafts
old
Branković
Europea
a kula,
n forest,
Roman
waterfal
bridge
l
Vučja.
Skakava
c na
Zelengo
ri
carpentry, handmade carpet weaving, dressing of leather stone cating,
Local heritage,
most important
feature
very specific way of singing and design,
beautiful national costume, specific
biodiversity
historical
event
Nevesinjsk
a puška,
very
specific
way of
singing
and design,
beautiful
national
costume,
specific
biodiversit
y
Hotels,
accommodation
quality,
capacities
very
poor,
unadeq
uite
one hotel
and B&B
very
poorly
developed
very
poor,
hotel is
closed,
there is
motel
with 31
bed
1 hotel,
4
motels,
182
beds
one hote,
turistic
infrastru
cture is
not
develope
d
tradition
of wine
producing
- wine
cellars
Dučić
night of
poetry
museum
of
Hercegovi
na, very
specific
way of
singing
and
design,
beautiful
national
costume,
specific
biodiversit
y
very good
accommod
ation, 3
hotels, 10
B&B,
good
restaurant,
wine
cellars
Grgurin
a,
Prima,
Bizanty,
Beskući,
City
tower
etc
stone graving, wine producing, wood carpentry
not
developed
one hotel
and few
motels
good
accommod
ation, old
hotels
need to be
modernize
d
accommo
dation
conditions
are very
poor (1
hotel and
few B&B
apartment
s)
319
Traditio
nal
tombsto
nes,
tradition
al
stonecut
ting;
tradition
al boats
(Neretva
nska
lađa)
no accommodation
available
Traditio
nal
tombsto
nes,
tradition
al
stonecut
ting;
Traditional woven head
baskets, traditional cuisine
accommodation condition is well, 3
hotels with 100 beds
1 hotel;
Private
accomodati
on
Konavos
ki vez
(tradition
al woven
for
Konavle
folk
costumes
),
traditiona
l dance
Konavos
ko kolo
No
hotels, no
data on
private
accomod
ation
embroid
ery, ship
building
,
kneeing
fisherma
n nets,
wood
processi
ng
embroid
ery, ship
building
,
kneeing
fisherma
n nets,
wood
processi
ng
embroider
y, leader
crafts,
wood
crafts
Everytin
g
connect
ed to
river
Neretva
(sailing,
fishing,
producti
on of
tradition
al boats
Neretva
nska
lađa
Number
of
chapels
(even
small
one on
houses)
and
everythi
ng
connect
ed to
river
and
water
areas
Traditiona
l dances
(Župska
polka,
Župska
poskočica,
…)
Only 2
hotels,
there are
more
hotels,
but
those
are
devastat
ed in the
War
2 hotels
8 hotels,
private
accommod
ation,
camps,…
accessibility by
air/rail
very poor
accessibility, nears
airport is Dobrovnik
(around 60 km)
Typical
products
very
specific
cheese
(sheep
and
cow sir iz
mješine
),
specific
dray
meat,
lamb
meat,
aromati
cal
plants,
honey
Health services
(hospitals,
ambulances, no
of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
just
visiting
doctor,
very
bad
situatio
n
Educational
system – no,
childcare
services, types
of secondary
schools,
5
primary
schools,
1
seconda
ry
school,
no
prescho
ol
instituti
ons
non
Universities,
institutes (list)
very
specifi
c
cheese
(sheep
and
cow sir iz
mješin
e),
specifi
c dray
meat,
lamb
meat,
aromat
ical
plants,
honey
only
one
ambula
nce,
very
poor
situatio
n
1
presch
ool
facility
,7
primar
y
schools
,1
second
ary
school
non
poor
accessib
ility by
train
(Nikšić
60 km),
by
airplane
(Mostar
90,
Dubrov
nik 106)
Gatačko
goveče
(type of
cattle),
specific
dairy
products
,
specific
dried
meat
accessibl
e by train
(Čapljina
40 km),
by
airplane
(Mostar
50 km)
accessible
by train
and
airplane
(first
station
Čapljina
and Mostar
50 km)
accessible
by air
(first
airport
Dubrovnik
35 km)
very good
accessibilit
y
very good
accessibilit
y by
railway,
first
airport is
in Mostar
accessible
by roads,
first
airport in
Dubrovnik
and
Mostar
it is
accessible
by road
and firs
airport is
Mostar 50
km
accessibility is very
limited
it is accessible
Rail passes
through
Ploče and
connects it
with
Central
Europe
Very bad
access,
local
roads are
in bad
shape,
there is
no rail
Very
accessib
le by
air,
consider
ing that
Čilipi
Airport
is 10 km
distant
Very
accessib
le by
air,
consider
ing that
Čilipi
Airport
is 40 km
distant
Čilipi
airport is
in te
municipali
ty
specific
dairy
products,
specific
dried
meat
potato,
specific
dray meat
products,
set of
traditional
dairy
products,
lamb meat
autochtho
nic wine
grapes
(Blatina i
Žilavka),
grah
poljak,
honey,
aromatical
plants,
dairy
products,
grappa
wine,
aromatical
ly plants,
cherry,
honey
honey,
aromatical
ly plans
olive oil,
aromatical
plants,
dairy
products
wine,
cherry,
grah
poljak
grah poljak, honey
dried meat, aromatically plants
Citrus
(especially
tangerines,
which are
famous),
olive oil,
vegetables
Olive oil,
wine
Olive
oil,
wine,
fruits
and
vegetabl
es
Olive
oil,
wine,
fruits
and
vegetabl
es
Olive oil,
wine
(Malvasia
Dubrovač
ka), fruits
and
vegetables
1.9
doctors/
1000 of
inh., 40
beds, 8
bed for
maternit
y, 6
teams fo
family
doctors,
1.02
doctors/1
000 inh.,
ambulan
ce
1.7
doctors/10
00inh.,
hospital
and
ambulance,
40 beds
5.1
doctors/10
00 inh.,
general
hospital,
public and
private
ambulance
s (10),
very good
situation
0.63
doctors/10
00inh.
0.79
doctors/10
00 inh.,
only
ambulance
1.08
doctors/10
00 inh.,
one
ambulance
0.83
doctors/10
00 inh.,
poor
capasity
2.14 doctors/1000
inh, ambulance
0.99/1000 inh.
2,12
doctors/100
0
inhabitants
2,12
doctors/1
000
inhabitan
ts
1
medical
centre;
2,12
doctors/
1000
inhabita
nts
2,12
doctors/
1000
inhabita
nts
2,12
doctors/10
00
inhabitants
2
prescho
ol
facility,
8
primary
schools,
1
seconda
ry
school
1
preschoo
l facility,
1
primary
schools,
1
secondar
y school
1
preschool
facility, 13
primary
schools, 1
secondary
school
2
preschool
facility, 9
primary
schools, 3
secondary
school
22 primary
schools, 1
secondary
schools
2 primary
schools, 2
secondary
schools
3 primary
schools, 1
secondary
schools
9 primary
schools, 1
secondary
schools
1 primary schools
26 primary schools, 4 secondary
schools
2
outposts
of
primary
schools
from
Metković
in
municipa
lity
1 kinder
garden,
1
primary
school
2 kinder
gardens,
2
primary
schools
non
non
non
3 faculties
non
non
non
non
non
non
None
None
None
320
None
Quality of
infrastructure
very
bad, not
develop
ed and
not
maintai
ned
properl
y
Local roads
167 km,
only
25% is
modern
Electricity,
water,
sewage…
electricity supply do
not cover whole
region, water
supply is based on
local water system
(not controlled)
sewerage do not
exist
ECONOMIC
GDP munic./ GDP
national
very
bad,
not
develo
ped
and not
maintai
ned
properl
y
362
km,
30%
moder
n
roads,
72%
are
local
roads
fairly
good in
urban
parts of
municip
ality,
except
sewage
system,
in urban
areas
infrastructu
re is fairly
good
in urban
areas it is
fairly
good, but
in rural is
poor and
not
maintaine
d
410 km,
37% of
them are
modern,
70% are
local
road
380 km,
28%
modern
roads, 72%
are local
roads, not
well
maintained
water supply covers
60% of household,
sewerage is organized
only for central part of
the city there is no
purification of waste
water
electricity
supply is
fairly
good,
water
supply is in
process of
reconstruct
ion,
sewerage
net exist in
urban area,
but there is
not
wastewater
treatment
313 km,
60%
modern
roads, not
well
maintaine
d and road
signalizati
on is
missing in
rural areas
water
supplay is
available
only in
urban
areas,
sewerage
exist in
urban
areas,
wastewate
r treatment
is missing,
city
supply in
rural areas
is not
good
BERKOVIĆI
48,40
in urban
areas
infrastru
cture is
fairly
good
BILEĆA
103,16
GACKO
224,88
173, 50%
are local
roads, not
well
maintained
235, 60%
are local
roads, not
well
maintained
145 km,
60% are
local roads
not well
maintaine
d
156 km,
70% are
local
roads, not
well
maintaine
d
63 km, not well
maintained, 80%
are local roads
202 km, 60% is local roads
Low
quality of
local roads
throughout
entire
Neretva
Valley
bad
Good,
but need
improve
ment
and
better
mainten
ance
electricity supply is fairly
good, water supply is
available for 20% of
population, and sewerage
net is developed in central
urban part, the purification
system does not exist
electricity
supply is
fairly
good,
water
supply is
available
for urban
population
, and
sewerage
net is
developed
in central
urban part,
the
purificatio
n system
does not
exist
poor
supply of
electricity
, water
and
sewerage
net for
urban
center is
developed
electricity supply
fairly good, water
supply is from
local water supply
net, sewerage does
not exist
supply of electricity is good, water
supply id developed in 80% of
municipality, sewerage system is not
well developed, the wastewater
purification system does not working
Electricity
exists, but
is in a low
quality
status
(power
losses are
often), 2
wind power
plants are
in a status
of
constructio
n, gas
pipeline is
in a status
of
constructio
n, water
supply of
Dubrovnikneretva
county is
around 8590%
Electric
grid is
satisfying
; no
sewage;
water
infrastruc
ture
needs
improve
ments
and
better
maintena
nce
All infrastructure is satisfying but
needs improvements
LJUBINJE
NEVESINJE
TREBINJE
ČAPLJINA
107,56
55,91
152,85
97,47
LJUBUŠKI
99,97
NEUM
STOLAC
117,87
RAVNO
46,26
31,84
ŠIROKI
BRIJEG
115,81
Good, but
need
improvem
ent and
better
maintenan
ce
PLOČE
ZAŽABLJE
ŽUPA
DUBROVAČKA
119% of national GDP per capita (2007.data)
GDP structure
(regional/zupanija
level if does not exist
on municipality
·
Primary
13.0**
7.60**
5% of total county GDP
·
Secondary
20.3**
20.85**
19% of total county GDP
·
Tertiary
32.0**
32.9**
55% of total county GDP
321
Good,
but need
improve
ment
and
better
mainten
ance
DUBROVAČKO
PRIMORJE
·
34.7**
Public
Most important sectors
identified in local
development strategies
agriculture
and tourism
109
Wages/national
average (BH=100%)
industry
(forging
and fittings,
construction,
and optical
and mechanical
appliances,
carpets and
food)
97
38.65**
wood processing and agriculture and tourism
123,6
95,9
94,4
Energy
production,
tourism and
agriculture
94
HDI or poverty rates if
exists (if not describe
situation at national
level)
There is no data about poverty line or level of poverty at municipality level. Anyhow the last
investigations suggest that 17% of population in B&H lives under the poverty level. It very important to
outline that almost 1/3 of population lives very near to the poverty border, so any worsening of
economic situation will push them under the poverty line.
Big players,
companies, structure
of enterprises, profile
(describe and list mort
important)
n/a
Bilećanka
(carpets),
Factory for
forging
and fittings,
Zrak (optical
devices), Nik
prom (leather),
Pađeni (dairy)
PiTE Gacko
(termal
elctropower
factory and
coal mine),
AD
Planinsko
dobro
(agriculture)
Atlas wood,
Koka
produkt,
Građevinar,
Soko gume,
Agrar,
Farmavit
n/a
HE
Trebišnica,
AGROCOR,
Wine
producers
tourism and
agriculture,
light
industry
construction,
tourism and
agriculture
105,69
99,39
21% of total county GDP
tourism
85,82
128,91
tourism
and
agriculture
mining,
metal
industry
and
tourism
and
agriculture
120,91
83,39
There is no data about poverty line or level of poverty at municipality level. Anyhow the last
investigations suggest that 17% of population in B&H lives under the poverty level. Having
in mind that big part of population have relatives in EU or USA it is expected that situation
is a little bit better then in rest of B&H.. It very important to outline that almost 1/3 of
population lives very near to the poverty border, so any worsening of economic situation will
push them under the poverty line.
Lasta
Čapljina
(wafle),
Agroherc,
Vinarija
Rebac
322
INKA quarry,
Mucić
(construction),
Rofix
(construction),
Al Maric (Al
joinery),
Interijer
(wood
processing),
Ero Merc
(wood
proccesing),
Winery
Hotel
Zenit,
Hotel
Neum,
HTP
Neum,
Judik doo
TGA
(construction),
Metall ferum
(metal
furniture), MG
cartoprint,
Stolačkipodrumi
(winery)
n/a
metal
industry
(Feal,
Metalac,
Stiropor),
Boksit doo
(mining),
Lijanovići
(food
industry)
1. Tourism
2. Transport, storage
3. financial services
76% of
national
average
(legal
entities,
2007.)
79% of
national
average
(legal
entities,
2007.)
76% of national
average (legal
entities, 2007.)
64% of national
average (legal
entities, 2007.)
NO of firms/1000
inhabitants
19
15,67
10,26
23,22
8,9
Self-employment rate
as percentage of labour
force
Employment rate
Female employment
rate
(F.employed/F.working
force
Share of adult social
welfare beneficiaries
on total labour force
21
59
53
93
45
52
59
27.6**
16.3**
16.3**
16.3**
16.3**
16.3**
16.3**
27,7
14,90%
15,90%
21,10%
6,90%
3,80%
23,90%
50.6**
25.83%**
25.83%**
25.83%**
25.83%**
25.83%**
25.83%**
0,06
0,13
0,25
1,36
0,42
0,36
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Unemployment rate
above RS
average
22.4%
22.4**
9
22.4**
27,72
26,19
49,60%
35,70%
26,50%
70,20%
37,90%
36,70%
Farm agricultural
mechanization
(number of tractors
per 100ha)
-
-
323
0,7607 on
national
level (high
human
development
country
according to
Human
Development
Index)
0,7607 on
national
level (high
human
development
country
according to
Human
Development
Index)
0,7607 on
national level
(high human
development
country according
to Human
Development
Index)
1. Luka
Ploče –
cargo port
Data not available
0,7607 on
national level
(high human
development
country according
to Human
Development
Index)
27,48 (Dubrovnik-neretva county level data)
Data not available
42,76% (Dubrovnik-neretva county level)
29,34 (2009.,
legal entities,
public
entities data
are not
available)
12,94%
(2009., legal
entities,
public
entities data
are not
available)
51,13% (2009.,
legal entities,
public entities
data are not
available)
42,41% (2009.,
legal entities,
public entities
data are not
available)
6,71%
(2001.data)
20%
(2001.data)
4,75%
(2001.data)
5,53%
(2001.data)
Most important
sectors/products of
agriculture
lamb, calv
and cheese
production,
honey and
strawberry
lamb, milk and
cheese, fruit
Cattle/arable land
n/a
n/a
0,34
Pigs/sown area
n/a
n/a
0,03
Sheep/agr. land
n/a
n/a
1,68
access to market for
agricultural
products/food
processing industry
very poor
very poor
lamb, cattle,
milk and
cheese,
potato
there is one
cooperative
supporting
farmers
chiken
production,
sour
cherries,
milk and
cattle
production
0,92
-
3,56
fairly good,
cooperative,
cooler
storage
potato, lamb
meat, dairy
products,
dried meat
wine,
potato,
apple, sour
cherries,
honey cattle,
pig
production,
aromatical
plants
grape,
peach,
nectarine,
mandarin
orange,
vegetables
grape, figs,
honey,
strawberry,
vegetable
n/a
0,29
n/a
0,10
n/a
0,68
n/a
n/a
0,68
fairy good
fairy good
grape,
vegetable,
organic
production,
aromatical
plants
vegetable
and fruit
meat
production,
vegetable
production
n/a
0,92
n/a
0,45
0,28
n/a
-
n/a
n/a
0,59
n/a
3,68
n/a
fairly good
fairly good
fairly
good
poor
poor
Other if relevant…..
324
0,59
12,8%
(2008.)
17,1%
(2008.)
6,9% (2008.)
7,7% (2008.)
Situation is worse than the one on county level (11%)
126,83
(pedestrian
controlled +
twin shaft
tractors)
21,81
(pedestrian
controlled +
twin shaft
tractors)
Citrus
(mostly
tangerines),
vegetables,
olive oil
Wine, fruit
and
vegetable
Negligible
34,63 (pedestrian
controlled + twin
shaft tractors)
21,90 (pedestrian
controlled + twin
shaft tractors)
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Proximity of
Dubrovnik
as an tourist
centre (100
km), Split as
an tourist
centre and
biggest city
on the
coastal area
(130km);
also
possibilites
for market in
Ploče itself;
processing
industry in
the area is
not yet
developed
SOCIAL
Women 1565/men 15-65
(15-40/ men 1550 years)
Any other
issue relevant
for gender
balance
Figures on women
participation in unemployed
population ('those who are
asking for job)
Ethical
groups,
minorities
Civil Society structure, describe, list most
important or most active in the field of agr.
Environment, culture, tourism… (NGO, kulturno
umetnicka drustva, asocijacije, koje i sta rade)
325
Historical monuments
Proximity of
Dubrovnik
as an tourist
centre (105
km), Split as
an tourist
centre and
biggest city
on the
coastal area
(160km);
processing
industry in
the area is
not yet
developed
Proximity of
Dubrovnik as an
tourist centre (9,6
km); also
possibilites for
market in Župa
Dubrovačka
itself; processing
industry in the
area is not yet
developed
Condition and functionality of
Cultural Heritage da li se koriste,
jesu li u upotrebljivom stanju
Proximity of
Dubrovnik as an
tourist centre (30
km); also
possibilites for
market in
Dubrovačko
Primorje itself;
processing
industry in the
area is not yet
developed
42,5'
non develop - 2 focused on culture
Old town Kostrum (national monument 10 century), St. Elias Church (14
century), Church Sv Trojice and Sv Voznesenija, necropolis of stećci
(Podhum, Hatelji, Dabrici)
only partly
BILEĆA
46.5'
non developed, few mostly focus to culture and
sport
Monastery Dobrićevo (12 century), Church Sv Ilije, 2 big sourcec od
water: Nikšićko vrelo, vrelo oko
it is accessible, but not very well
maintained
GACKO
59.5'
15 NGO, focused on culture and sport
Old city Ključ, Chrch Sv Nikola (national monument 15 century),
Mausoleum in Lipnik, Chrch Sv Dimitrije, and Sv Trojice (in the center
of the town 19 century), nekropolis in Slivlji, old European forest,
waterfall Skakavac na Zelengori
it is accessible and in good condition
LJUBINJE
47.9'
poorly developed and focused on culture and
sport
Chrch Sv Ilije (13 century), Chrch Sv Kneza Lazara (16) century,
necropolis Mramorja
not well maintained
NEVESINJE
49.3'
poorly developed focus on humatiranian work
BiH national monuments: Chrch Vasnesenija Presvete Bogorodice, Sahat
kula, old city Stražić, necropolis Kalufi; arheological sites: 39
prehistorical sites, 31 roman, 8 middle age
partly well maintained, but sites out
of city are not accessible by public
transport
BERKOVIĆI
98.6**
326
50.33'
50 NGO, half of them is not active
Arslanagića bridge, mosques: Sultan Ahmedova, Osmanova, Muje
Kotezije; Monastery: Tvrdoš (4 century), Duži (16 century), Sv Petra i
Pavla (6 century), Zavala (6 century), old village Uveća (empty), old city
Klobuk Mićevac, fortres Strač, Brankovića kula, Roman bridge Vučja.
in urban areas and few very well
known and monastery are well
maintained, but accessibility by
public transport is limited
developed focused on environmental issues and
culture
settlement Mogorjelo, midlevel fortress Stolac, old city Počitelj,
archeological sites: Jezero, Desilo, Gabela
fairly good, but accessibility by
public transport is limited and
information about places are missing
LJUBUŠKI
mostly focused on culture and sport
Old city Ljubuški, Franciscan monastery and museum (1884), roman
fortress Gračin, Roman Christian basilicas(Vojnić, Vitina, Priboj, C.
Grm), 45 necropola sites (stećci), Waterfalls: Kravice and Koćuša
fairly good, but accessibility by
public transport is limited and
information about places are missing
NEUM
mostly focused on spor and culture
necropolis: Brštanica, Crkvina, Dašnica, Dabrovo, Lise, archeological
sites
not in good condition
STOLAC
not developed
necropolis: Radimlja, BiH national monument: old city Stolac
accessibility is very limited, there is
no information on site
TREBINJE
ČAPLJINA
n/a
n/a
n/a
327
RAVNO
not develop
remains of old cities (gradine): Čavljani, Orahov Dol, Golubnica; Chrch
Sv Mitra, Sv petra (catolik chrch)
very well, but accessibility by public
transport is limited
ŠIROKI BRIJEG
43 NGO, 50% is focused on culture and sport
antical city: Mokriskika, midieval city: Borak, old cristian chrch in
Mokro (5 century), Franciscan monastery, museum and gallery
accessibility by public transport is
limited
Mostly in good shape, some need
restoration
PLOČE
75%
Data not available
95,12
Teutas castle in Baćina, monument of st. Nicholas, church of st. Jure
and st. Luka in Baćina
ZAŽABLJE
64%
Data not available
99,67%
old church of Little Madonna in Dobranje, old church of st. Jon the
Baptist on Vidonje, old graveyard in Dobranje
ŽUPA
DUBROVAČKA
80%
Data not available
93,32
prehistoric tombs throughout the county
Mostly in good shape, some need
restoration
DUBROVAČKO
PRIMORJE
70%
Data not available
99,05%
Rotunda, church of st. Jeronim
Mostly in good shape, some need
restoration
KONAVLE
72%
Data not available
96,51%
Franciscan monastery in Cavtat, mausoleum of Račić family in Cavtat¸
Knežev dvor, house of Vlaho Bukovac
Mostly in good shape, some need
restoration
protected national monuments: Fortresses: Forte Mare, Kanli, Arza,
building of hotel Plaža, fisherman village Rose, Museum, City arhive
it is in good condition to be visited,
there are no organized touristic
guides
HERCEG NOVI
n/a
n/a
n/a
0,08
328
KOTOR
0,33
Old city is protected monument: Duke palace, Napoleon theater, Arsenal,
Franciskan monastery, Churches: Sv Mihaila, Sv Koledule, Sv Nikole,
Sv Triumfa, Sv Luke, Palace: Buća, Drago, Grgurina, Prima, Bizanty,
Beskući, City tower etc
it is in good condition to be visited,
there are no organized touristic
guides
NIKŠIĆ
0,04
protected monument Old city Onogošt, Bedem, bridges. Carev, Vukov,
Gordin, Monestery Sv Luka, Chrch: Orthodoks catedral, Crvena stijena,
stećci (grave stones), City museum, ski center Vučje
partly is in good condition, it is not
fully functional
HUMAN
Dependence ratio (population less than
15+population over 65)/population 16-65)
Share of population 65+
years old on total population
Share of
population up to
15
Aging ration (population up
to 15/population 65+)
aging population, there are no jobs
n/a
n/a
n/a
GACKO
0,53
23,61
11,5
0,488
LJUBINJE
0,55
20,8
14
0,67
NEVESINJE
1,03
35,3
15,2
0,42
BERKOVIĆI
Educational structure of
population over 15
·
Primary
44**
·
Secondary
·
High
·
Without
% of agricultural
population
48**
8**
45**
6,5
80,2
13,3
35
44**
48**
8**
45**
BILEĆA
329
35
TREBINJE
0,5
18
15,5
0,86
ČAPLJINA
0,52
17,71
16,67
0,93
LJUBUŠKI
0,48
16,54
15,86
0,95
26%**
NEUM
0,43
18,67
11,83
0,63
26%**
STOLAC
0,44
19,52
11,17
0,57
26%**
RAVNO
0,47
30,66
1,56
0,05
26%**
ŠIROKI BRIJEG
0,53
14,28
20,49
1,43
26%**
PLOČE
0,49
13
19
1,48
19
39,81
13,06
15,84
28,27
ZAŽABLJE
0,67
21
18
0,87
17,4
39,81
2,3
40
71,53
ŽUPA
DUBROVAČKA
0,45
10
21
2,16
15,47
57,25
6,05
21,07
15,38
DUBROVAČKO
PRIMORJE
0,7
25
15
0,6
23,1
37,22
7,21
31,87
61,74
KONAVLE
0,55
22,3
17,64
0,79
18,67
48,83
10,71
21,25
48,46
HERCEG NOVI
0,46
14,39
17,49
1,21
15,38
56,60
18,66
7,97
0,60
KOTOR
0,45
14,25
17,95
1,25
18,02
51,56
18,41
11,02
0,60
NIKŠIĆ
0,49
13,07
20,01
1,53
21,82
53,14
11,90
11,82
2,80
330
17,03
41.7%**
49.9%**
8.4%**
26%**
INSTITUTIONAL
BERKOVIĆI
Strategies
adopted (No, or
list some most
important)
Who were
partners in
preparation of
strategic
documents
Are there
the
following
institutions:
Development
Agency
(local/regional)
Regional
Chamber
of
commerce
Business
Incubators
Other if relevant
whether the
municipality
has a
website
whether it
has a
bilingual
website,
including
minority
languages
whether
there is an
option on
the site
where
citizens can
ask
questions
Non
-
-
-
-
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
REDAH,
regional
development
agency
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BILEĆA
GACKO
Strategy of
development of
municipality
Gacko 20102020, Local
Environmental
Action Plan
LJUBINJE
Strategy of
development of
municipality
Ljubinje 20112020, Local
Environmental
Action Plan,
Strategy of
communication
Yes
331
no
NEVESINJE
Strategy of
development of
municipality
Nevesinje 20062010, Strategy
of
communication
-
-
-
TREBINJE
Strategy of
development of
municipality
Trebinje20082017, Strategy
of social
protection,
LEAP
-
-
-
Yes
ČAPLJINA
n/a
Industrial zones (4) are
formed
no
LJUBUŠKI
Strategy of
economic
development of
municipality
Ljubinje 20072012
NEUM
n/a
-
-
-
-
-
-
332
STOLAC
RAVNO
Strategy of
economic
development of
municipality
Stolac, Strategy
of
communication
Yes
n/a
n/a
ŠIROKI BRIJEG
Strategy of
economic
development of
municipality
Stolac 2006 2015
PLOČE
Plan of spatial
planning;
Developmental
strategy of
Dubrovnikneretva county
All local
stakeholders;
Developmental
Agency in
Dubrovnik,
consulting
firms; regional
office of
Croatian
Chamber of
Economy
Industrial zones
Yes, in
Dubrovnik
Yes, in
Dubrovnik
Data not
available
In the time
of writing
this report,
official
website was
unavailable
because of
system
maintenance
333
In the time
of writing
this report,
official
website was
unavailable
because of
system
maintenance
ZAŽABLJE
Plan of spatial
planning;
Developmental
strategy of
Dubrovnikneretva county
All local
stakeholders;
Developmental
Agency in
Dubrovnik,
consulting
firms; regional
office of
Croatian
Chamber of
Economy
No
ŽUPA
DUBROVAČKA
Plan of spatial
planning;
Developmental
strategy of
Dubrovnikneretva county
All local
stakeholders;
Developmental
Agency in
Dubrovnik,
consulting
firms; regional
office of
Croatian
Chamber of
Economy
Yes
334
No
No
DUBROVAČKO
PRIMORJE
Plan of spatial
planning;
Developmental
strategy of
Dubrovnikneretva county
All local
stakeholders;
Developmental
Agency in
Dubrovnik,
consulting
firms; regional
office of
Croatian
Chamber of
Economy
KONAVLE
Plan of spatial
planning;
Developmental
strategy of
Dubrovnikneretva county
All local
stakeholders;
Developmental
Agency in
Dubrovnik,
consulting
firms; regional
office of
Croatian
Chamber of
Economy
Yes
335
HERCEG NOVI
n/a
-
KOTOR
-
NIKŠIĆ
-
Yes, local
Yes,
national
-
Touristic organization
-
(5) SAR PLANINA Region
PHYSICAL
Position -peripherally/centrality
Is it close to coastal zone?
% of agricultural land in total area
% of forestry land in total area
TEARCE
JEGUNOVCE
The municipality is located at the foot of Tearce Shara, respectively in the north-western
Republic of Macedonia, including a large field of Polog. In the west, Municipality of Tearce
borders the Republic of Kosovo, in the south with the municipality of Tetovo, and north-east
with the municipality of Jegunovce. Until 1965 in the municipality of Tearce was included
current municipality of Jegunovce.
no
Located in the north-west of the Republic of Macedonia
64.6
27.44
no
26.6
39,82
Qualitative characteristics of soil
Gravel and sandy clay sediments and fertile fields. Mountain region with high percentage of
quality pastures with plants.
Mostly alluvial and deluvial soils which offer good conditions for agriculture production.
Prevailing climate
Mediterranean and continental climate. In the higher mountain regions is present mountain
climate
Moderate continental
Tearce-540 m. Tourist village with a high above sea level of 1700 m
390-870 m
The space occupies the village Lesok measures applied by third level of protection valid for a
Second protective zone. “Sar Planina” as a proposal for a national park.
Reserve amiable chestnut, a proposal for a special nature reserve, near
Tearce
The municipality is located in the first protection zone of the spring ”Rashche
Average high above sea level (Mountain peak if exists)
National parks. Nature parks. protected area
Short elaboration. if exists
The spring “Rashche” provides most of the capitol (Skopje) with drinking water.
hunting ground
n/a
Fishing on many of the rivers, and some hunting grounds on Sar Planina.
Rafting spots
no
no
Spa centers
no
n/a
Caves
n/a
n/a
Geothermal waters
Other relevant…
Considering the geographical position of this region, it is rich with natural water resources.
n/a
Until 1965 in the municipality of Tearce was the current municipality of Jegunovce (along
with Vratnicën). With the municipal territorial organization of municipalities of Tearce 1966
joined the municipality of Tetovo
Large deposits of limestone, some springs of mineral water.
336
TEARCE
HERITAGE
JEGUNOVCE
The number of settlements is 13. Varvara, Brezne, and determ Jelloshnik are hillymountainous settlements , while Nerasht village lies on the right of road
Regional R-405, in the field.
built environment.
n/a
n/a
Near lake region of Brest has started to build a tourist village with a high above sea level
of 1700 m, weekend urban area" three waters "with the area of two hectares
n/a
n/a
favorable conditions for development of agriculture, especially for livestock production,
development of the tourism, especially promotion of the agro food products and
investment attractiveness
In the tourist village will rise some weekend-houses, which will be offered for rental or
purchase of domestic tourists and foreign
n/a
quality of housing. architecture.
monuments and landmarks
Traditional handicrafts
Local heritage. most important feature
Hotels. accommodation quality. capacities
rail
Limestone products, some grains and vegetable crops
6 ambulances, some dental clinics and some private pharmacies.
n/a
5 central and 3 regional primary schools
3 central with 13 regional primary schools
no
No
Educational system – no. childcare services. types ofsecondary
schools.
Universities. institutes (list)
Partly built
n/a
Regional road R-405, R-403 (Tearce-Jagunovce). Currently working on the road from the
"three waters" with a distance of 3.5 km. The total length of local roads in Tearce is about
77 km and 7 bridges are in the function.
Grid coverage is lined up along the existing street directions, Sewage system is not in
scope, the collection of municipal waste water is adjusted to the way individual septic
tanks. The main problem of Tearce citizens is potable water supply. The Municipality
has Tearce inadequate and outdated primary water network
Reservoirs for drinking water are under construction.
Telecommunications network is little developed. No radio or television
local station. There are activities to improve the network of mobile telephony in
Municipality. Recently, internet is available to citizens of Tearce.
More than half of the local roads are asphalted, and there are few regional roads that
connect to the Skopje-Gostivar freeway, and the P-405 connects to Kosovo.
Quality of infrastructure
Electricity. water. sewage…
Other if relevant:
n/a
agro food products
Typical products
Local roads
n/a
Rail, since 2001 not in function
accessibility by air/rail
Health services (hospitals. ambulances. no of doctors/1000
inhabitants…)
In the lower part settlements are compact type, in mountainous areas there are broken
type
The electricity infrastructure is at a satisfactory level. Water supply is at a high
percentage, but there are still areas with old asbestos-cement pipes that need to be
replaced. The sewage system exists partially and needs further development.
Telecommunication system is satisfactory.
TEARCE
JEGUNOVCE
GDP munic./ GDP national
0,431
0,435
GDP structure (regional/zupanija level if does not exist on municipality
The share of Polog region in the total GDP amounts 7.1%
The share of Polog region in the total GDP amounts 7.1%
ECONOMIC
•
Primary
n/a
n/a
•
Secondary
n/a
n/a
•
Tertiary
n/a
n/a
•
Public
n/a
n/a
337
Most important sectors identified in local development strategies
Agriculture as the main economic branch. According employment, service sector
(73% employs), industry (23% employs)
agriculture (4% employs).
n/a
Wages/national average
n/a
n/a
HDI or poverty rates if exists (if not describe situation at national level)
n/a
n/a
Big players. companies. structure of enterprises. profile (describe and list mort important)
The economy in Tearce constitute small and medium enterprises:
production enterprises, catering, shops and more. Economic potential is composed of
small private farm holdings private farmers, caterers, traders, craftsmen and others.
IGM “Vratnica” j.s.c. – Vratnica, exploitation of high quality sand and stone of
calcium carbonate
NO of firms/1000 inhabitants
2.8
19.46
Self-employment rate as percentage of labor force
n/a
n/a
9
Employment rate,
37%
27.91%1 (32.3%2)
Female employment rate
26,93%2
29.4%1
Share of adult social welfare beneficiaries on total labor force
n/a
n/a
Unemployment rate
Unemployment rate is 63%. Unemployment rate of young, according to the census
of 2002
year (age 15-24) is 84.2%. Long-term unemployment as
percentage of total unemployment is 87.5%..
n/a
15.47%1 (26.4%2)
Field crop(wheat), vegetables (tomatoes, peppers,
potatoes, cabbage, beans, watermelons and melons. and fruit production (apples,
kiwi, nuts, cherries). For sale grow almost the same crops, as well as tobacco and
grapes. In forage production alfalfa accounted for 53% of total production, while
others feed clover plants, animal peas, corn and beet. Also, main products are lamb,
sheep and cow milk and eggs.
0.7
n/a
Farm agricultural mechanization (number of tractors per 100ha) .
Most important sectors/products of agriculture
Cattle/arable land
3
0,56
Pigs/sown area
SOCIAL
n/a
0,644
0,564
Sheep/agr. land
0.6
0,424
access to market for agricultural products/food processing industry
Vicinity to the Kosovo border as opportunity for easy access on market.
Good access to market due to regional roads and the vicinity to the Kosovo border.
TEARCE
338
JEGUNOVCE
0.67*
Women 15-40/ men 15-50 years
0.68*
Any other issue relevant for gender balance
29,42%**
26,96%**
•
Albanian (84.4%)
Macedonian (55%)
•
Macedonian (12.2%)
Albanian (43%)
•
Turkish (2.3%)
Serbs (1%)
•
Roma (0.304%)
Roma (0.37%)
Figures on women participation
Civil Society structure. describe. list most important or most active in the field of agr.
Environment. culture. tourism… (NGO. kulturno umetnicka drustva. asocijacije. koje i
sta rade)
Historical monuments
Information about NGO’s n/a. Some cultural and artistic organizations: SHKA "Ismail
Qemali"- Nerasht; SHKA "Vëllazërimi"-Sllatinë; SHKA "Jehona"- Përshefc dhe SHKA
"Teuta"- Tearcë. Social cooperatives are in poor condition.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Condition andfunctionality ofCultural Heritage da li se koriste. jesu li u upotrebljivom
stanju
Two Bresson, settlement since Roman times. It is located 2km south of the
village.
Hazel, a neighborhood- vikus of late antiquity and the old Chistian basilica
time
Lesok depot medieval coins
Young, medieval necropolis
Rooster, settlement since Roman times,
Churches, a complex of medieval churches
Mulberry, a necropolis since Roman times.
Some are in active use and good condition.
11 NGO’s. Multiethnic Active Center “MAC”; Association of Women of municipality
Jegunovce; KUD “Izvor”, traditional and folk dances; Hunting society “Ljuboten”; Fishing
society “Rakita”; Kick box club “Tetova”.
Many archaeological localities dating from the stone age, to medieval
times (churches and keeps)
Many localities not properly conserved and marked.
TEARCE
JEGUNOVCE
0.49
0.52
Share of population 65+ years old on total population
8.72%
12.45%
Share of population up to 15
24.29%
21.83%
2.78
1.75
HUMAN
Dependence ratio (population less than 15+population over 65)/population 16-65)
Aging ration (population up to 15/population 65+)
Educational structure of population over 15
•
Primary
44.85%
42.12%
•
Secondary
14.88%
31.44%
•
High
3.26%
3%
339
•
Without or incomplete
% of agricultural population
8.39%
23.54%
40.1
50.2
Other if relevant ….
Census 2002
Izvor: Popis 2002 i internst strana za Jegunovce, Opshtina Tearce, strategija za obrzovanie
(6) PRESPA LAKE Region
PHYSICAL
Position -peripherality/centrality
Is it close to coastal zone?
% of agricultural land in total area
% of forestry land
Qualitative characteristics of soil
Prevailing climate
Average high above sea level (Mountain peak if exists)
National parks, Nature parks, protected area
hunting ground
Rafting spots
Resen
Located in Prespan valley in the South-East part of RM.
Yes. Large part of the municipality lies on the waters of the Prespan lake (177 km2 or 19%)
2%
2.5%
Suitable for fruit production , mainly apples (70% of the ag. production)
Moderately Continental and Mediterranean
Aver. 880 meters. 853 meters (lake of Prespa) and 2600meters (mountain peak Pelister)
“Pelister” and “Galichica” (national parks), “Erzani” (protected natural area, part of Pelister), “Prespan lake” (natural monument), “Big City” (protected natural area)
Hunting ground of “Brajchino” (within the municipality strategy, this ground is planned to be included within the modern touristic complex)
No
340
Spa centers
Caves
Geothermal waters
Other relevant…
(Mines)
HERITAGE
built environment,
quality of housing, architecture,
monuments and landmarks
traditional handicrafts
Local heritage, most important feature
Hotels, accommodation quality, capacities
accessibility by air/rail
Typical products
Health services
Educational system – no, childcare services, types of secondary schools,
Universities, institutes (list)
Quality of infrastructure
Local roads
Electricity, water, sewage…
No
No
No
“Evla”, “Petrino”, “Lavci” (cooper mines)
“Dolno Dupeni”, “Ljubojno”, “Krani”, “Bolno”, “Evla”, “Izbishte” (iron mines)
“Lavci” (coal mines), etc.
Resen
Relatively urbanized (8 banks, 2 insurance companies, 1 post office)
Developed industry (mainly food, textile, etc.)
Good housing conditions in city and some rural areas, but without specific architectonic characteristics (except in certain localities), as well there are old buildings that need reconstruction.
In rural areas: Church St. George in “Kurbinovo”, Monastery St. Ilija in “Grnchari”, Monastery St. The virgin Mary in “Slivnica”, church St. Peter in “Brajchino”, etc.
In city area (Resen): building “Saraj” with ancient exponents; mosque “Hadziramadan”
Traditional house building (stone houses, stonewalls, stone ovens, woven fences) in “Brajchino”, “Ljubojno”, “Konjsko” and “Dolno Dupeni”.
Very important archeological area: registered 130 localities and 95 ancient churches and monasteries.
Touristic settlements, almost abandoned: “Asamati” (200 beds), “Pretor” (400 beds) & “Krani” (2000 accom. facilities) - they utilize different accommodation facilities- bungalows, camp
trailers, villas), and “Oteshevo” (in reconstruction) and here is located the Center for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of respiratory diseases (24 rooms or 72 beds).
Hotels: 3 (229 beds)- good accommodation but not renovated, 2 motels.
Many restaurants.
Rural tourism: well developed in Stenje, Brajchino, Dolno Dupeni, Pretor and Ljubojno (accommodation is offered within the local houses).
Tourism within monasteries: active in “Jankovec” and “Slivnica”.
Airport in Ohrid (55 km distance form city of Resen)
Rail station in Bitola (50 km distance form city of Resen)
Bus lines (available throughout whole municipality and inter-municipalities)
Apples, specific candies
Poor health services (1 public health institution - which is in process of reforms, and part of its facilities are leased by other institutions; health clinics in 4 villages, and temporary health clinics
in 3 villages)
Child care service: 1 kindergarten (in the city of Resen)
Schools: 5 primary schools, 1 secondary school
No
Relatively good.
Highway (M5): Bitola-Resen-Ohrid, with frequency of 3000 vehicles/day.
Regional roads: p505 (Makazi-Greek border), p503 (Makazi-Carina-Stenje-Albanian border), p504 (Carina-Galichica-Ohrid).
Local paved roads (length 145 km)
Local unpaved roads (length 8 km)
Electricity supply: good coverage (one main substation in the city of Resen and 159 MV stations.
Water supply: good coverage ( regional water utility -utilized by 12000 inhabitants, incl. 1 city and 16 villages, local water supply system- supplies 500 inhabitants from 3 villages, individual
villages’ supply systems- incl. 16 villages or 4000 inhabitants; only one village is not supplied with water utility).
Sewage network: good within the city (separated, fecal and atmospheric, with length over 35 km); less developed in rural areas.
Wastewater networks: partially coverage
Process water networks: no implemented system
Irrigation system and improvements: developed (coverage of 263.26 km)
Telecommunications: total coverage with mobile and fixed telephony (7000 phone lines). 20% of the population own and utilize computer technologies.
ECONOMIC
Resen
GDP munic./ GDP national
GDP per capita=168 560*
GDP structure (regional/zupanija level if does not exist on municipality
·
Primary
n/a
·
Secondary
n/a
·
Tertiary
n/a
341
·
Public
n/a
Most important sectors identified in local development strategies
Food processing, apple production, tourism (incl. alternative tourism),
Wages/national average (BH=100%)
n/a
HDI or poverty rates if exists (if not describe situation at national level)
n/a
Big players, companies, structure of enterprises, profile (describe and list mort important)
NO of firms/1000 inhabitants
DOO Swisslion – Agroplod (food processing),
CD Fruit (fruit & vegetable processing)
DOO Hateks (confection)
OHIS Prespa Plast AD (plastic profiles)
AD Algreta (aluminum profiles)
DOO Interbrauk (furniture)
7.5**
Self-employment rate as percentage of labour force
n/a
Employment rate%
69.9% (41.4% in services; 39.7% in industry; 18% in agriculture, and 0.9% other)
Female employment rate
40.3%
Share of adult social welfare beneficiaries on total labour force
Unemployment rate
30.1%
Farm agricultural mechanization
n/a
Most important sectors/products of agriculture
Apples (70%)
Cattle/arable land
0.44*
Pigs/arable land
0.35*
Sheep/agr. land
0.90*
access to market for agricultural products/food processing industry
Proximity of big cities (Bitola- 31 km distance; Ohrid- 35 km distance; Skope- 139 km distance).
Apples are mainly sold to Agroplod (in the city of Resen) and other food processors; as well they are exported (50%) in Romania,
Egypt, Russia, Ukraine (but, yet not well organized). The remaining part is sold on green markets.
Food processing capacities mainly sell to the national market with well developed marketing networks.
Other industries are mainly export oriented.
SOCIAL
Women 15-40/ men 15-50 years
Any other issue relevant for gender balance
Figures on women participation in unemployed population
Ethical groups, minorities
Civil Society structure, describe, list most important or most active in the field of agr.
Environment, culture, tourism… (NGO, kulturno umetnicka drustva, asocijacije, koje i sta
rade)
Historical monuments
Resen
0.66*
0.42
Macedonian 76.07; Turks 10.68; Albanians 9.13; Roms, 1.09; Others 2.59
Registered about 70 (seventy) associations and NGOs
5 dealing with agriculture
5 dealing with ecology and environmental protection
3 focused on presentation and promotion of culture and cultural heritage
2 dealing with protection of cultural heritage.
4 dealing with tourism
6 organizations are committed to protecting and promoting the rights of youth, civil society and human rights.
There are 130 archaeological sites, 1000 archaeological exhibits, 500 coins and 450 exhibits of ethnological heritage. There are 95 churches and monastery complexes and 1024 icons.
−
St. George in Kurbinovo since 1191,
−
St.Ilija in Grncari since XVIII century.
−
St. Gogorodica in Slivnica sicne 1607
−
St. Peter in Brajcino since XVI century
−
St. Athanasius in Dolno Dupeni since1864
342
−
St. Athanasius in Ljubojno since 1623,
−
St. Archangel in Asamati since 1633,
−
Hadzhiramadan mosque. Since1592.
The building , Saraj, is a monument of culture built in the early XX century in which the Resen ceramics colony and the memorial museum art exhibition Keraca Visulceva are located.
Some are restorated while some need so recostruction and restorration
-
Condition and functionality of Cultural Heritage
Crime rates?
HUMAN
RESEN
Dependence ratio (population less than 15+population over 65)/population 16-65)
0.41
Share of population 65+ years old on total population
0.17
Share of population up to 15
0.13
Aging ration (population up to 15/population 65+)
0.75
Educational structure of population over 15
From the Census 2002
·
Primary
33.00%
·
Secondary
34.00%
·
High
6.00%
·
Without
25.00%
18.00%
% of agricultural population
INSTITUTIONAL
Resen
Strategies adopted (No, or list some most important)
Strategy for development of Municipality of Resen
IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme between Greece and The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Who were partners in preparation of strategic documents
Are there the following institutions:
Development Agency (local/regional)
Regional Chamber of commerce
Business Incubators
Other if relevant
List implemented CBC projects (topic, partners)
whether the municipality has a website
whether it has a bilingual website, including minority languages
whether there is an option on the site where citizens can ask questions
National Extension Agency (Regional centre - Bitola, Working Unit - Resen)
Regional centre Bitola and Ohrid
Business Incubator Bitola (BIB)
Center for Development of New Businesses – Bitola (BSC - Bitola)
Center for Development of Pelagonia Region
Pelagonia Regional Development Agency (PREDA)
−
Biodiversityconservation and enhancment (among Republic of Macedonia, Greece and Albania; initiated by PREDA)
−
enforcement of good neighbourly relations and mutual understanding of interaction regarding regional development,(among
Republic of Macedonia, Greece and Albania ; initiated by local government)
−
border lake protection (among Republic of Macedonia, Greece and Albania; initiated by department of Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Regional Envirionmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC))
www.resen.gov.mk
No
Yes
343
(7) SKADAR LAKE Region
PHYSICAL
Podgorica
Cetinje
Bar
Ulcinj
Shkoder region
Position -peripherality/centrality
Capital of Montenegro
Bar is the most developed and largest
city on the Montenegrin coast
Ulcinj is located in the extreme southeastern part
of Montenegro, the Adriatic Sea and Skadar Lake
On the north west of Albania.
Is it close to coastal zone?
the city is only some 50 km from the
Adriatic Sea,
The city nestles on a small karst plain surrounded
by limestone mountains, including Mt. Lovćen, the
Black Mountain from which Montenegro gets its
name.
About 30 km
% of agricultural land in total area
% of forestry land
Qualitative characteristics of soil
Prevailing climate
National parks, Nature parks,
protected area
Does not have hydro potential
Red soils (Terra rossa), 84 000 ha, are distributed in the coastal area and in the basin of
Scadar lake up to 500–600 m. The coastal part of the country has a significant share of deep
and relatively fertile alluvial-deluvial land, while terraces and the plateaux represent brown
anthropogenic land.
Wet Mediterranean climate, with cool very rainy winters and hot dry summers.
average altitude of 671 m, highest peaks Stirovnik
(1749 m) and Jezersko peak (1660 m)
The highest point of the municipality's
top mountain Rumija, with an altitude
of 1.593m
Skadar Lake, with its coast is to the
National Park,
Old Olive of Mirovica monument was
put under State protection in 1957
Možura, coastal mountain 622 m
The Skadar lake is a well-known
hunting resort
no
Kite surfing at Ada Bojana, all manner of water
sports at Velika Plaza, scuba diving, mountain
biking, hiking, orienteering, cycling through the
olive groves at Valdanos, deep sea fishing on the
Adriatic, lake fishing at Lake Skadar, and river
fishing in Ada Bojana, are among the many
possibilities for sport and recreation
a modified Mediterranean climate with hot,
dry summers and cold winters. Podgorica is
particularly known for its extremely hot
summers: temperatures over 40 °C (104 °F)
are common in July and August
Average high above sea level
(Mountain peak if exists)
“Skadar Lake”
“Locen” mountain, “Skadar Lake”
Short elaboration, if exists
•
hunting ground
•
Rafting spots
no
a coastal resort town
no
Caves
20%
36%
Alluvial plain, with hills to the east to the Tepe
Hills to the south. Dominating types of land
are neutral meadow and alluvial meadow
types.
Mediterranean with continental and maritime
mixture
Lowland and hills with average high of 100 m
and up to highest peak- Jezerca with an
altitude 2,642 meters
protected area- Shkodra Lake Natural Reserve
Theth national park
Buna–Velipoja protected landscape
In Alps
no
yes
Spa centers
•
The most valuable resource is Velika Plaza
(Large Beach), which is a 12 km long stretch of
sandy beach and the longest beach on the
Montenegrin coast. Ada Bojana is popular among
tourists for its peace and unique atmosphere.
Šaško lake and Ulcinj's salt pond are popular
among birdwatchers, because Ulcinj and its
surroundings are major resting points for over
200 bird species on their migration paths
Yes
In the near of Cetinje is the Lipska pecina,
according to several sources one of the biggest
caves in the former Yugoslavia. It starts in the
village Lipa and end in the mountains directly over
the Adriatic Sea. The cave was open for tourists
344
Around 50 caves
with a guide till 1967, since then only for organised
private visits
•
Geothermal waters
Other relevant…
HERITAGE
Podgorica
built environment,
quality of housing, architecture,
monuments and landmarks
the city expanded in a form of often chaotic urban
sprawl, with densely built private lowrise dwellings
leaving little space for streets and sidewalks. Efforts
have been made to improve the infrastructure of those
settlements, but many problems remain, especially in
large low-rise neighborhoods in north and northeast
Podgorica.
many examples of Turkish architecture. The oldest
parts of the city, Stara Varoš (Old town) and Drač are
typical of this, with two mosques, a Turkish clock
tower and narrow, winding streets.
New landmarks include the Hristovog Vaskrsenja
orthodox temple and the Millennium Bridge, the main
feature of the Podgorica skyline.
traditional handicrafts
Local heritage, most important
feature
Hotels, accommodation quality,
capacities
NO
Mines: Palaj ,Karme, Turrec,
Bauxite and Villgar
white bauxite deposit in White
plains, the possibility of exploitation rather limited
Transit tourism, different kind of accommodation is
available
Cetinje
Bar
Ulcinj
Njegos mausoleum on Lovćen, On Eagle's krs,
a hill is a mausoleum of Bishop Daniel, the
founder of the dynasty Petrovic - Njegos
Unlike other Montenegrin medieval towns,
this place was not inhabited continually, so
new times did not bring changes to affect
its earlier ambience.
there are churches and buildings from
different epochs, squares, medieval palaces
and houses that once were abundant with
life.
picturesque settlements around Skadar
Lake
Need a prohibition on further unplanned
development, environmental protection
along the river Bojana, the Sasko Lake
Traditional housing
Cetinje Monastery, Vlaška church (built in
1450, with its fence made out of barrels of
captured enemy rifles), Biljarda, numerous
museums, Zetski dom royal theatre and historic
foreign embassies. Many of the old embassies
and other administrative buildings are now
schools
well preserved Bar Aqueduct constructed
during the 16th century - 17th century.
Ulcinj's old town is a very well preserved
castle-looking community that is left over
from medieval times. The old town sits
atop a mountain overlooking the shore
and is a tourist attraction on its own
Illyrian ruins of Gajtan,
Rozafa castle, Mes Bridge, Ebu Beker Mosque,
Shkodër Cathedral, Shkodër Orthodox
Cathedral, Isa Boletini Monument, and Kratul
Cetinje has a rich publishing and printing
tradition. The Printing House of Crnojevići
(1492–1496) and the books published there are
of great importance for Montenegrin culture
and history as well as for the culture of other
Orthodox Balkan peoples.
Has so far mainly a transit tourism,
accommodation facilities are underdeveloped.
There is no tourism infrastructure or
professional services. In addition to the hotel
"Grand" (400 beds) and small hotels and guest
houses on the river Crnojevića, Ivanova Korita
in Virpazar, there is no other acceptable
accommodation.,
Ruins of Bar Old Town, one of the world’s
largest fortified archaeological sites. The
Old Olive of Mirovica is a trademark
natural feature of Bar. It is believed to be
more than 2000 years old and it is one of
the oldest olive trees in the world.
Characterized by uncontrolled and
illegitimate competition: mass tourism with
an excessive number of visitors at low
turnovers per guest. much of the
accommodation facilities belongs to lower
category
.
Well preserved architecture of the XIX century
345
The hotels are old, used
80% and the 2 stars. Behind the Long
Beach emerged unplanned, with a large
new settlement seasonal housing. It is
unattractive and lacks quality. With
15,000 beds in the estimated dwellings,
Ulcinj immediately after Budva
Shkoder region
Traditional wood products
Church of Shirgji, Mes Bridge, and medieval
city of Sarda.
Tradita, Natyral Razima Resort,
Colosseo,Grand Europa, Kolping, not high
standard
accessibility by air/rail
Podgorica's location in central Montenegro makes it a
natural hub for rail and road transport. The Belgrade–
Bar line converges with the line to Nikšić and line to
Shkodër Podgorica's main railway link (for both
passenger and freight traffic) is Belgrade–Bar. The link
to Nikšić is currently under reconstruction and
electrification, with passenger service expected to start
in 2012. The rail link to Shkoder is currently used as
freight-only. Podgorica Airport is 10 km south of the
city center.
Cetinje is connected to Podgorica and Budva
through three-lane motorways. Both towns are
about 30 km (away from Cetinje. Another road
to Podgorica is built on the coast of Skadar
Lake. Tivat Airport is 50 km away and
Podgorica Airport is 55 km away.
Typical products
famous grape brandy, even more famous wines (from
the largest vineyard in Europe - AD Plantaza)
a high quality authentic products are
“Njeguški” cheese and ham “Njeguski prsut”,
processing of endemic plants, honey, organic
food
Health services (hospitals,
ambulances, no of inhabitants
/doctors
Educational system – no, childcare
services, types of secondary schools,
Universities, institutes (list)
117.46
396.22
222.41
460.12
9 hospitals, 1118 beds, 26 Maternities, 259
doctors, 68 dentists
54 primary schools and 12 secondary schools
8 primary schools and 3 secondary schools
20 primary and 3 secondary schools
17 primary schools and 2 secondary
schools
122 elementary schools, 174 kinder garden, 37
secondary schools, one university
University Luigj Gurakuqi of Shkodra
Building a functional infrastructure for
water supply, electricity, sewerage,
planning and construction of a strictly
controlled in the hinterland of the Great
beaches, golf.
The current installed capacity in Albania is
1,446 MW, representing a utilization rate of
only 35 percent of its hydropower potential.
Shkodra is currently supplied by four power
stations. The water supply network comprises
the water pump stations in Dobraç, the water
reservoirs in the Tepe Hills and the distribution
pipeline network. The sewage system is selfflowing, i.e. it uses the natural incline of the
land, and, through the mains collector, the
Quality of infrastructure
• Local roads
•
Electricity, water, sewage…
Most of Montenegro's higher education establishments
are in Podgorica. It is home to the University of
Montenegro, the country's most significant such
institution. The University includes four scientific
research institutes as well
Bar has a ferry line with Italian city of Bari;
seasonally ferries go to Ancona, Italy. The
Sozina tunnel shortened the road
connection with Podgorica to around 50
km. Bar is connected to the rest of the
coastal towns of Montenegro by the
Adriatic motorway, which extends from
Ulcinj to Herceg Novi, and on to Croatia.
Bar is also the final station of the Belgrade Bar railway. Podgorica Airport is some 40
km away.
Ulcinj is connected with the rest of
Montenegro by two-lane highways. It is
connected with other coastal towns by the
Adriatic Motorway. Reaching inland is
made possible by detouring from the
Adriatic Motorway at Budva or Sutomore
(through Sozina tunnel). Nearby airports
in Tivat and Podgorica are both around
70 km away.
Since ancient times the region is famous by olives, citrus fruits (tangerines, lemons), figs.
there are products that can have a recognizable brand, especially known Crmničko wine
and spirits, goat, cow and sheep cheese, olive oil and fruits (kiwi, Japanese apple, peach,
avocado). This region is particularly rich in various kinds of Mediterranean herbs (pelim,
rosemary, bay leaf, thyme, savory) that are very suitable for making tea and spices. There
are also major habitats of edible mushrooms (porcini, mushrooms, and chanterelles). It is
rich in fish stocks (sea and lake). In Rijeka Crnojevića a fish canning factory and it is
possible to make facilities for drying lake fish (carp and bleak). There are excellent natural
conditions for developing goat (meat, milk and cheese) and beekeeping.
4 higher education institutions (Faculty of
Tourism, Hotel and Trade, Faculty of
Business Management, Belgrade Business
School and Faculty of undergraduate
studies in the field of agriculture - course:
Mediterranean fruit. The centre for
subtropical cultures, founded in 1937, is the
oldest scientific institution in Montenegro.
It conducts research in the field of
subtropical cultures and environmental
protection.
The local traffic infrastructure is in relatively
good condition. Some of problems are related
to the width of the lane, improper leveling,
lack of curbs, signage, pedestrian paths and
sidewalks
Water and sewerage networks were developed
for large businesses that are now almost
extinct, so there are serious difficulties in water
supply. Sometimes, due to the extreme amount
of rainfall, there is the danger of flooding the
lower parts of the city and suburbs. Local
electrification networks are outdated and are in
poor condition, which in the case of larger
natural disasters and atmospheric discharge
causes frequent failures.
346
Main transport Adriatic – Ionian corridor of the
European road network crosses the territory.
Railway to Tirana.
The road infrastructure is being upgraded with
the reconstruction of the Shkoder-Muriqan and
the rehabilitation of the Shkoder-Zogaj road
segments.
tobacco and manufacture of cigarettes,
production of conserved foods, sugar-based
foods, soft and alcoholic drinks, and pasta,
bread, rice and vegetable oil
The local telecommunications network requires
additional work and investments in its
modernization
sewage goes to the pumping station located in
the Liria neighbourhood of Shkodra. The
pumping station then pumps the waste directly
into the River Drin, near Bahçalleku Bridge.
Telecommunication is based on both land
(fixed) and mobile system.
Other if relevant:
ECONOMIC
Podgorica
GDP munic./ GDP national
26.8%
GDP structure (regional/zupanija level if does not exist on municipality
•
Primary
•
Secondary
•
Tertiary
•
Public
The largest number of companies registered in
Most important sectors
trade, financial and other business services and
industry and mining. In these three sectors
operating companies 81.6% of Podgorica
na
Wages/national average
HDI or poverty rates if exists (if not
describe situation at national level)
Big players, companies, structure of
enterprises, profile (describe and list
mort important)
NO of firms/1000 inhabitants
Self-employment rate as percentage
of labour force
Employment rate
Female employment rate
Share of adult social welfare
beneficiaries on total labour force
Unemployment rate
Compared to the national average the Podgorica
municipality belongs to the economically
developed.
The Podgorica aluminium smelter (Kombinat
aluminijuma Podgorica – KAP, owned by
Rusal) and AD Plantaže (a wine and brandy
making company) are still among the biggest
companies in Montenegro.
Cetinje
Ulcinj
the participation in the republic's GDP in
2004 was 11.52%, making it the second
municipality, after Podgorica per share in
GDP of Montenegro.
GDP munic./ GDP national 0=1,32
The economy of Ulcinj is very dependent on
tourism and its economic activity is highly
dependent on the season, given that 17.5% of the
population employed in tourism. GDP munic./
GDP national=0,46
Shkoder region
10.58% Coastal Region
17.70% Coastal region
49.33% Coastal region
22.37% Coastal region
na
The sector "Transport, storage and
communication" employs 24.7% of
workforce "wholesale and retail trade"
16.9%, and "hotels and restaurants" 6, 72%.
95%
Trade, construction and processing industry
highly represented gray market, that is why
registered income at a very low level
Proceseed meet producers „Martex “,
„Interproduct” “„Niksen Trade “,Kronus
MN"
which produces horizontal freezers for
household, “Ribarstvo Rijeka Crnojevica” canned fish
Economic symbols of Bar are the Port of Bar,
Belgrade - Bar railway and the Sozina tunnel.
The food industry “Primorka”There are
around 1300 small and medium enterprises
"Solana Bajo Sekulic,"
n.a
n.a
n.a
45,1%
42.6%
n.a
37,5%
38.1% Central region
n.a
43,8%
42.8%
n.a
about 90% of households offered accommodation
in private rooms. For this reason, almost the
entire economy of this city relies on tourism and
SMEs are generally present engaged in tourism
and wholesale and retail.
55,8%
16.0%
18.5
10.3%
Farm agricultural mechanization
(number of tractors per 100ha)
Most important sectors/products of
agriculture
Cattle/arable land
Bar
unlike the other costal areas, does not depend
on tourism and the tourist season as other
industries are developed in Bar
livestock is also quite scarce due to climate
conditions and terrain
Pigs/sown area
Sheep/agr. land
access to market for agricultural
347
Berttoni, shoe factory
ADEL CHI- green shoe
Felix-M
Dupon- Chemical
Madishi Cottonella, ALB-KONF, Moda-Telli
and LAURUS-textil
n.a
10.3%
Number of unemployed 17.097 of 243000
population (regional office for Emplyment in
Shkodra in 2004)
Tobacco, Potato, Kidney bean, Grain and corn
and fodder
products/food processing industry
Other if relevant…..
SOCIAL
Women 15-40/ men 15-50 years
Any other issue relevant for gender
balance
Figures on women participation in ….
whatever
Ethical groups, minorities
•
•
•
Civil Society structure, describe, list most
important or most active in the field of
agr. Environment, culture, tourism…
(NGO, kulturno umetnicka drustva,
asocijacije, koje i sta rade)
Condition and functionality of Cultural
Heritage da li se koriste, jesu li u
upotrebljivom stanju
Crime rates?
Podgorica
Cetinje
Bar
Ulcinj
Shkoder region
Montenegrins 57.35%
Serbs 23.26%
Albanians 5.13%
Montenegro has a vibrant civil society with many active
NGOs, but their presence is uneven, both regionally and in
terms of thematic focus. The strongest are those in
Podgorica, which deal mainly with good governance, human
rights, anticorruption, and EU affairs, and have considerable
capacity
for public advocacy.
Montenegrins 90.6%
Serbs 4.6%
Muslims 0.4%
Montenegrins 46.5%
Serbs 25.34%
Muslims 7.7%
Albanians 70,6%
Montenegrins 12,4%
Serbs 5,7%
0.012
0.015
Economic Relief Agency
0.047
0.018
HUMAN
Podgorica
Cetinje
Bar
Ulcinj
Shkoder
Dependence ratio (population less than
15+population over 65)/population 1665)
Share of population 65+ years old on
total population
Share of population up to 15
0.46
0.47
0.48
0.53
0.5
na
na
na
na
9.1
21.1
20.0
17.6% Costal Region
Aging ration (population up to
15/population 65+)
Educational structure of population
over 15
• Primary
• Secondary
• High
• Without or incomplete
% of agricultural population
Other if relevant ….
2.14
1.24
1.58
1.67
2.87
20.74%
52.46%
15.94%
9.35%
3.1%
25.03%
49.05%
11.43%
12.44%
1.9%
22.39%
47.13%
13.94%
13.85
3.0%
22.84%
35.02%
97.32
25%
5.6%
15%
31%
32%
13%
INSTITUTIONAL
Podgorica
Strategies adopted (No, or list some most
important)
No information available on local/regional strategies!
Strategic Development Plan of Fushe-Arrez Municipality
Strategic Development Plan of Vau i Dejes Municipality
Strategic development plan of KOPLIK municipality Shkodra
strategic plan for economic development 2005-2015
Montenegro Business Alliance (MBA)
TEULEDA
Who were partners in preparation of
strategic documents (da li su svi
stakeholedri zastupljeni)
Are there the following institutions:
• Development Agency (local/regional)
Cetinje
Bar
26.11
348
Ulcinj
Shkoder region
•
Regional Chamber of commerce
•
•
Business Incubators
Other if relevant
List implemented CBC projects (topic,
partners)
whether the municipality has a website
whether it has a bilingual website,
including minority languages
whether there is an option on the site
where citizens can ask questions
Other if relevant ….
Chamber of Commerce of Montenegro
(CEM)
Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Montenegrin Employers Federation (MEF)
Various professional associations.
Center for Entrepreneurship and
Economic Development (CEED), which
provides consulting services in developing
business plans, market research, training of
employees, employers and entrepreneurs,
and other tailor made services at the
request of clients, etc.;
Local Business Center Cetinje (founded
by the Agency for Small and Medium
Enterprises)
Bar Association of Entrepreneurs brings
together over 70 companies from the Bar
and to represent their interests first and
foremost at the local level.
BSC Bar, which provides training in
starting businesses and provides
information for entrepreneurs
Companies and entrepreneurs in Ulcinj
formed an association (UBA), which is a
member of the national MBA.
One is Shkodra
Albanian Foundation for for Training and Development (AFTD)
Confederation of Trade Unions Associatons of Woman of
Shkodra-Refleksione
Yes (data on the local economy is very
modest)
No
Yes (data on the local economy is very
modest)
Yes
Yes (data on the local economy is very
modest)
No
No
yes
No
Only Albanian
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
no
349