Introduction to JCM Methodologies Akihisa Kuriyama Researcher, Climate and Energy Area Institute for Global Environmental Strategies 6 July, 2015@Szentendre, Hungary 11 15 JCM methodologies have been approved Project type Energy Efficiency (saving electricity consumption) Host country Indonesia Mongolia Title • Energy Saving by Introduction of High Efficiency Centrifugal Chiller • Installation of Energy-efficient Refrigerators Using Natural Refrigerant at Food Industry Cold Storage and Frozen Food Processing Plant Installation of a separate type fridge-freezer showcase by using natural refrigerant for grocery store to reduce air conditioning load inside the store • • Installation of LED Lighting for Grocery Store • Installation of Inverter-Type Air Conditioning System for Cooling for Grocery Store • • • Installation of energy-saving transmission lines in the Mongolian Grid Improving the energy efficiency of commercial buildings by utilization of high efficiency equipment Introduction of Room Air Conditioners Equipped with Inverters • Displacement of Grid and Captive Genset Electricity by Solar PV System Viet Nam Renewable energy Palau, Maldives For detail, please see https://www.jcm.go.jp/ 22 15 JCM methodologies have been approved Project type Host country Mongolia Viet Nam Energy Efficiency (saving fossil fuel combustion) Indonesia Title • • • • • Replacement and Installation of High Efficiency Heat Only Boiler (HOB) for Hot Water Supply Systems Transportation energy efficiency activities by installing digital tachograph systems GHG emission reductions through optimization of boiler operation in Indonesia GHG emission reductions through optimization of refinery plant operation in Indonesia Power Generation by Waste Heat Recovery in Cement Industry 33 Key elements of JCM methodology 1. Eligibility criteria – Requirement for the project to be registered in the JCM. – Requirement for the project to be able to apply the approved methodology. 2. Reference emissions – The reference emissions are calculated to be below business-as-usual (BaU) emissions to ensure net emission reduction 4 44 Approach to realize net emission reduction • Using conservative default values in parameters to calculate project emissions instead of measuring actual values will lead calculated project emissions larger than actual project emissions. => e.g. ID_AM001 Power Generation by Waste Heat Recovery in Cement Industry BaU emissions Calculated project emissions Actual project emissions 55 Approved methodology: Energy Saving by Introduction of High Efficiency Centrifugal Chiller (1/3) Introducing high efficiency centrifugal chiller for the factories etc., which is characterized by: Non ozone-depleting refrigerant, HFC 245fa COP more than 6.0 The existing old type chiller whose COP is approximately 5.0 is assumed to be used continuously in general, except for the JCM project implementation, in order to avoid new investment on replacement/installation. The COP of the chiller eligible under the methodology is higher than any of commercially available chillers in Indonesia, thus eligible as a JCM project High Efficiency Centrifugal Chiller 66 Approved methodology: Energy Saving by Introduction of High Efficiency Centrifugal Chiller (2/3) 𝐸𝐸 = 𝑅𝑅𝑝 − 𝑃𝐸𝑝 GHG emissions 𝑃𝑃𝑝 = � 𝐸𝐸𝑃𝑃,𝑖,𝑝 × 𝐸𝐸𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑖 𝑅𝑅𝑝 = � 𝐸𝐸𝑃𝑃,𝑖,𝑝 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑝,𝑡𝑡,𝑖 /𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅,𝑖 × 𝐸𝐸𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 Reference emission = PE*(COPp,tc,i/COPRE,i) 𝑖 • PEp: Project emissions during period p [tCO2/p] • REp: Reference emissions during period p [tCO2/p] • ECPJ,I,p: Power consumption of project chiller i during the period p [MWh/p] • COPPJ,tc,i: COP of project chiller i calculated under the standardizing temperature conditions • COPRE,i: COP of reference chiller i under the standardizing temperature conditions • EFelc: CO 2 emission factor for consumed electricity [tCO 2 /MWh] Project emission Time Difference between JCM and CDM JCM Emission Reference emissions – reduction Cal. project emissions CDM Baseline emissions – Project emissions 77 Approved methodology: Energy Saving by Introduction of High Efficiency Centrifugal Chiller (3/3) Emission reductions are calculated based on the difference between the amount of project power consumption and reference power consumption which is derived from the ratio of the project COP to the reference COP. The reference COP is conservatively set as a default value by taking maximum COP of commercially available chillers in the certain cooling capacity . Maximum COP value in the respective cooling capacity range Likely range of BaU emissions Likely range of BaU COP Reference emissions The amount of emission reductions not to be credited, which ensures “net emission reductions” The calculated emission reductions to be credited Project emissions Monitoring is simplified as only a single parameter is to be monitored: Power consumption of project chiller 88 Approved methodology: Power Generation by Waste Heat Recovery in Cement Industry (1/2) The project utilizes waste heat from the cement production facility by waste heat recovery (WHR) system to generate electricity. Only 1 WHR system has been installed to 1 plant out of existing 25 plants in Indonesia. WHR system in cement industry is not a commonly installed technology in Indonesia, thus eligible as a JCM project Image of the technology Steam Suspension Pre-Heater Power supplied to internal grid SP Boiler Power generation Kiln Clinker cooler AQC Boiler Steam Waste heat 99 Approved methodology: Power Generation by Waste Heat Recovery in Cement Industry (2/2) Emission reductions are calculated based on the difference between the quantity of electricity supplied by the WHR system to the cement facility and the calculated maximum power consumption of the WHR system. The maximum power consumption of the WHR system is derived from the total maximum rated capacity of equipment of the WHR system assuming their operation of 24h/day. Quantity of electricity supplied Maximum power consumption Actual power consumption The calculated net electricity generation The amount of power generated but not to be credited, which ensures “net emission reductions” Monitoring is simplified as only two parameters are to be monitored: The quantity of the electricity supplied from the WHR system to the cement production facility The number of days during a monitoring period 1010 Methodology for High Efficiency HOB for Hot Water Supply Systems (1/2) High efficient HOB (Heat Only Boiler) for hot water supply system: 80% or higher boiler efficiency (catalog value) feeding coal on the stoker uniformly dust collector equipped Conventional HOBs High efficient HOBs Produced by EKOEFEKT Co., Czech Republic Produced by CARBOROBOT Co., Hungary Efficiency of both reference HOBs and project HOBs are set as default value based upon actual measurement. 1111 Methodology for High Efficiency HOB for Hot Water Supply Systems (2/2) Net emission reductions by setting default values as : Higher possible efficiency of reference HOBs Lower possible efficiency of project HOBs Boiler Efficiencies BaU emissions Reference HOBs: 37.1-60% (measured) 35-63% (literature) 53.3% Project HOBs: 56.2-69.1% (measured) 75-85% (literature) 61% Reference emissions Net emission reductions Credits Project emissions Project emissions (actual) Monitoring is simplified as only two parameters are to be monitored: Net heat quantity supplied by the project HOB Total hours of the project HOB operation during the monitoring period 1212 Methodology for small-scale solar PV system at commercial facility in Small Island States (1/2) Solar PV system to displace grid electricity and/or captive electricity using diesel fuel as power source Solar PV system certified with: Design qualifications (IEC 61215, IEC 61646 or IEC 62108) Safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2) (1) Monitoring point Solar PV system Net-metering DC AC kWh Solar PV module Inverter Revenue meter Grid Power flow From the solar PV system From the grid User (End point) The quantity of the electricity generated by the project solar PV system and irradiance are monitored for checking the operational status of the installed solar PV system 1313 Methodology for small-scale solar PV system at commercial facility in Small Island States (2/2) Project emissions are zero Reference emissions are calculated from [AC output of solar PV system (monitored value)] X [emission factor (tCO2/MWh)] GHG emissions BaU: Existing diesel generators 33-41% (power generation efficiency) 0.805-0.631 tCO2/MWh (emission factor) Reference: Hypothetical state-of-the-art diesel generators: 49% (power generation efficiency) 0.533 tCO2/MWh (emission factor) Net emission BaU emissions Reference emissions Project emissions = 0 tCO2 reductions Credits The grid emission factor provided by this methodology; To ensure net emission reductions; Toeliminate burden to calculate emission factor by finding out field data; To avoid confusion as to which data vintage should be used when calculating emission reductions; To be applicable in countries where necessary field data are not available; To have potential to be applied widely. 1414 JCM Methodology provides monitoring Spreadsheet An approved methodology consists of an approved methodology document and a Monitoring Spread Sheet Project participants needs to monitor only 2-3 parameters Difference between JCM and CDM JCM Methodology provide a format and sheet for monitoring CDM Project participants develop a report or calculation sheet by themselves 1515 Summary • 15 methodologies has been approved. (Mongolia, Indonesia, Viet Nam, Maldives and Palau) • JCM methodologies has the concept of reference emissions that realize net emission reductions. • Setting default values and provide monitoring spread sheet contribute to simplified methodologies, which would reduce burdens related to writing PDDs and monitoring data by project participants. 1616
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz