Advanced solutions for virtual process modelling: application to steel ingot manufacturing from casting to open-die forging JAOUEN Olivier1,a, COSTES Frédéric1,b , SAAD Ali1,c and LASNE Patrice1,d DUCLOUX Richard1,e * , 1 TRANSVALOR SA Parc de Haute Technologie – 694 avenue Dr Maurice Donat 06255 Mougins Cedex – France a b c [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], d [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: fluid-structure model, turbulent flow, segregations, grain structure, cellular automata (cafe), complete manufacturing process chain, ingot casting & open-die forging simulation, heat treatment. Abstract. The health of forged components depends on the quality of the semi-product previously issued from casting process. In that context, a numerical simulation tool able to master material characteristics from initial casting to the final forming process would be of a great interest for steel makers and forging manufacturers. This is the purpose of the present paper. Nowadays, it is well known that ingot defects like hot tears or cracks are rooted in the very beginning of the solid shell’s birth. Damages are resulting from the competition between the hydrostatic pressure occurring within the turbulent flow in the liquid zone and tensile stress combined with a strain state occurring while the skin solidifies. In addition, the thermal energy pulled-out from the cast-metal product into the mold has a huge impact on the shell’s thickness. This thermal energy is also affected by the air gap growth issued from the shrinkage of the solidified together with the deformation of the mold constituents. Numerically speaking, the fluid/structure model is one of the most appropriate methods to take into consideration all these phenomena through an accurate way. Indeed, a standard CFD method does not represent the solid behaviour, so that the stresses, strains and air gap evolution due to the shell’s shrinkage are not reachable. On the other hand, a single standard FEA model cannot represent accurately the liquid behaviour. In a first part, this paper describes a new 3D fluid/structure model involving the turbulent fluid flow and the solid constitutive equation. The management of the “liquid time step” allowing high velocity motion into the liquid phase of the alloy coupled with the “solid time step” dealing with the solid phase and the corresponding slow motion is shown. Moreover, the fluid-structure model is well adapted to localize segregation especially when using quality input data delivered by thermodynamic databases. An applicative example with an ingot casting considering the coupling with the deformation of the mold is presented. On top of that, the example includes grain structure calculation resulting from a CAFE method coupled with the cooling of alloy. It also illustrates the impact of a top powder defined as a deformable body and therefore able to follow the shrinkage of the ingot top surface. The exothermic reaction is considered as well in order to estimate its impact on the cooling time and the final quality of the cast-metal product. In a second part, the paper describes the benefits of simulating the complete manufacturing chain from initial casting to open-die forging and final quenching. A direct data transfer from casting to forging is performed between the simulation tools. All results from the casting stage are so considered into the forging model. Both casting & forging models are fully compatible. Hence, there is not any loss of data in the transition step and the forging process simulation launch is seen as a simple restart step from the casting simulation. In that context, data like global shape, porosities, segregation distribution issued from the casting are accounted in the forging process in order to fully monitor the history and their impact on the final product’s health. The modelling of the forging stage allows estimating the efficiency of the manufacturing process with regards to the closure of porosities and the tracking of segregations. In addition, the carbon rate concentration coming from the casting stage and transferred into the subsequent forging stage will impact the solid phase changes occurring in the final quenching operation. The simulation of this phenomenon is possible considering an appropriated heat treatment model based on TTT diagrams which depend on the local carbon concentration. Finally, this paper demonstrates how steel makers and forging manufacturers can take benefit of full compatible process modelling software in order to simulate the entire the forming chain from raw material to final end-user product. Introduction The heavy industry, petrochemical and/or the nuclear, uses largely the shells as high pressurized container. These shells are obtained after a sequence of multiple operations that may involve different methods. The sequence can start from solid ingots. It can also assemble rolled and welded sheet metal, or can use hollow ingots. Compared to the other methods, the sequence starting from hollow ingot presents certain advantages. Indeed, in that context, as opposed to the method using rolled and welded sheets, the final product that is one piece avoids weaknesses in welded areas. On the other side, on the contrary to the process starting from a full ingot, it gains a screwing operation. In addition, since the porosities are in the core of the shell and not at skin area, they can be better controlled way during the becking operation yielding a better quality product. The final segregation distributions are still easier a lot to anticipate. However, in spite of all these advantages, all is not perfect in this model. Indeed, by its hollow nature, in order to obtain the requested qualities of the final product, the solidification of the ingot must be perfectly mastered. Thus, a specific and complex cooling is applied to the inner wall of the ingot aiming at obtain symmetrical characteristics between its inner and outer walls. This can be yielding from controlled circulation of water or blown fresh air. In order to fully carry out all of this chain, a simulation tool can be of great help in this process. It allows optimizing the cooling time, to regulate the inner cooling or to estimate the intern structure. Moreover, it can be helpful in the forging operations in the determination of the sequence of strokes, and many things else. However this involves the capability to simulate the entire sequence of different operations from the ingot casting to the heat treatment passing through the mandrel drawing. In this paper a numerical model able to perform the simulation of all these successive operations is presented. It shows the perfect and natural chaining between an ingot casting simulation software and an open die forging software. Through a dedicated example, the authors show how the specific conditions of cooling of the ingot are taken into account through the implementation of thermomechanical interfaces boundary conditions. The impact of air gap on temperature change and the reverse effect on the ingot shape are particularly highlighted. They illustrate the same, how porosities and segregations are on the one hand determined by the casting software and on the other hand, naturally transferred to forging software. Thus, the monitoring of their evolution and their impact on the mechanical behavior and on the structure of the final product is perfect. Mandrel drawing and becking operations are shown including the example of the closure of porosities. At end, the distribution of local segregation is taken into account in order to illustrate the impact of phase changes during the heat treatment operation. Finally, this article presents the strategic interest of a simulation tool capable of predicting the overall process of making a shell from a hollow ingot for casting ingot, cooling and its forging. Authors propose a coupling between the two products to have an advanced numerical suite for the design of such components. This coupling will allow to produce parts meeting the requirements of high levels of nuclear and petrochemical industries as well as to limit the actual tests representing a significant material savings regarding the volumes and mass of the parts involved. Ingot casting Mandrel drawing Becking Heat Treatment Machining Fig 1: Example of the making chain of a shell from hollow ingot. Final part is obtained after casting of a hollow ingot, mandrel drawing operation, then becking operation. Heat treatment operation is not presented here, but could be also performed Case context The case illustrated in this article was built internally from the knowledge of our engineering experts. Only the initial CAD files for ingot casting step computation were provided by one of our industrial partners. The material of the shell is 40CMD8. Dimensions of the initial ingot are presented Fig. 2. Its weight is of 140 tons. The casting step is a bottom pouring process through a running system spited in 3 feeding gates (Fig. 4). The flow rate is set such that the speed of the flow front represents 100mm/min. The initial temperature is 1550°C. Once the ingot tripped out, the cut of the riser and the bottom yields a piece which height is 3 m. It will be stretched till 4 m at the end of the mandrel drawing process. Ingot casting Mandrel drawing Fig 2: Dimensions of the cast ingot, and after the drawing and becking steps. Casting process Fluid/Structure model The simulation of the casting process requires a specific treatment of the different phase changes of metal, liquid, mushy and solid, from the beginning of pouring to the end of solidification. By default, the casting software calculates evolution of temperature in the cast product and the different components of the cooling system, the mold, the casting plates, and other refractory or insulating cover powder, etc. This is performed using a dedicated model. At any time, the mechanical equilibrium is governed by the general momentum equation: .σ g γ 0 . (1) where σ is the Cauchy stress tensor, g is the gravity vector, and γ is the acceleration vector. The very different behaviours of liquid and solid metal are considered by a clear distinction between constitutive equations associated to the liquid, the mushy and the solid states respectively. In order to fit the complex behaviour of solidifying alloys, a hybrid constitutive model is accounted. The liquid (respectively, mushy) metal is considered as a thermo-Newtonian (respectively thermoviscoplastic, VP) fluid. In the solid state, the metal is assumed to be thermo-elastic-viscoplastic (EVP). However, this scheme has a drawback. Indeed, the resolution is carried out in one shot, taking account the total range of temperature. Due to the limits of actual algorithms and hardware precision, it cannot consider the corresponding total magnitude of concerned viscosity. In order to deal with the very large range of the viscosity values involved within the solidification process of the molten alloy, a two steps scheme is used for the solving of (1). Hence, one step, step 1, is dedicated to the mushy and solid zones, the “solid solver”, and another one, step 2, is in charge of the liquid and mushy zones, the “liquid solver” (Fig 3). Solid regions are treated in a Lagrangian formulation, while liquid regions are treated using an ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian) method [2]. A so called, transient temperature, or coherency temperature, is distinguishing the two different behaviours. It is typically defined in between liquidus and solidus, and usually set close to solidus. Thermo-physical parameters are setup such that the continuity of behaviour is ensured at transient temperature. For more information, the interested reader can refer to [3] to [5]. Under that context, two cases are possible. Option 1, the transient temperature bounds the two steps. The full coupling liquid/solid is ensured by the control of liquid velocities and pressure with the solid corresponding ones at “transient temperature volume interface” [6]. Option 2, an overlap within the mushy zone is also available. Yield, both “liquid solver” and “solid solver” are applied on the total or partial range between liquidus and solidus (Fig. 3). In addition, any governing model can be associated to each solver. In particular, turbulent fluid flow within the liquid zone of the metal is managed by the Navier-Stokes equations completed by LES terms [7]. Fig 3: Schematic representation of the option 2 for the 2 steps algorithm. The high level of temperature for the step 1 (Tstep1) is within the mushy zone range. Same, the low level of temperature for the step 2 (Tstep2) is within the mushy zone, such that Tstep 1> Tstep2. In case of Tstep1 = Tstep2, it is similar to the option 1. The choice of the two temperatures Tstep1 and Tstep2 is depending on the structure of the alloy within the mushy zone, typically, it can depend on the viscosity and/or the solid fraction and the composition. In that scheme, the step 2 of the algorithm is not only dealing with the liquid metal, but also with the air within the cavity till this one is fulfilled. This is possible thanks the use of a level-set method. Level-set represents the distance (t ) to the interface (t ) between fluids at time t , here liquid metal and air; its expression is: ( x, t ) dist ( x, (t )) in (t ) ( x, t ) 0 on (t ) ( x, t ) dist ( x, (t )) in / (t ) (2) where is the cavity space, (t ) is the space occupied by the metal into the cavity, and / (t ) is the remaining space, meaning the air space. Considering definition (2), flow front of the metal is the 0 value iso-surface of (t ) [6], [7]. Thermal model The solving of the general energy equation drives heat transfers: dH (T ) .( (T )T ) dt (3) where T is the temperature, (W/m/°C) denotes the thermal conductivity and H (J) the enthalpy which can be defined as: T H (T ) ( )C p ( )d g l (T ) L (Ts ) (4) T0 T0 (°C) is an arbitrary reference temperature, (kg/m3) the density, Ts (°C) the solidus temperature, C p (J/kg/°C) the specific heat, g l the volume fraction of liquid, and L (J/kg) the specific latent heat of fusion. In the one-phase modeling, g l (T ) can be previously calculated using the microsegregation model PTIMEC_CEQCSI [8] or results from micro-segregation model that can be used [9]. Cooling conditions One of the difficulties in the casting of the hollow ingot is the cooling control. In particular, the cooling of the inner side represents a king of challenge. Indeed, in the end of the solidification, the intern structure of the ingot must be as symmetric as possible compared to the outer side. However, the building of the cooling system is rather asymmetric: the inner side is a thin wall whereas the outer side is a wide cast iron mold. Therefore, the difference of mold constitution between inner side and outer side has impact on solidification. That very difference must be balanced by the cooling conditions. This requires a perfect control of the inner cooling. Typically, what are usually considered are either water channels or air blowing. In our case, fresh air blowing all over the surface of the inner wall has been chosen. This is carried out numerically speaking by a specific heat transfer coefficient, representing the blow effect (Fig. 5). Fig 4: Illustration of the ingot shape. Note the three feeder gates. Thermal transfers Deformable exothermic powder follows the metal shrinkage At ingot/mold interface : - Specific heat transfers depending on the mold nature - Air gap/pressure dependent heat transfers Mechanical transfers At ingot/mold interface: - Sticky liquid - Friction for mushy and solid phases At mold/mold interface : - Specific heat transfers depending on the molds’ nature Blown fresh air cooling Fig 5: illustration of the configuration of computation. A symmetry plan has been used in view of the geometry of the casting. To fully address the evolution of the temperature through the various system components casting, a fine mesh is adapted in the insulating parts such as refractory and garnex parts. Similarly, the part of the mesh running system is refined to manage the flow. The various mechanical and thermal boundary conditions are indicated. They allow to take into account the interactions between the various components of the casting system with one another and with ambient. The boundary conditions applied on free surface of the mesh of the different parts of the cooling system are of classical different types: average convection: T .n h(T Text ) where h (W/m²/°C) is the heat transfer coefficient, and Text is the ambient temperature radiation: T .n stef (T 4 Text ) , where is the steel emissivity, stef is the Stephan 4 – Boltzmann constant. external imposed temperature: T Timp . external imposed heat flux: T .n imp n denotes the outward normal unit vector. At part/molds interface, heat transfers are taken into account with a Fourier type equation: 1 T .n (T Tmold ) Req where Tmold is the interface temperature of the mold and Req (5) (W/m²/°C) 1 , the heat transfer resistance that can depend on the air gap and/or the local normal stress, as presented below: Req 1 Rs if eair 0 or 1 1 1 min( , ) R0 Rair Rrad where Rair eair air and Rs es s Req 1 Rs if eair 0 1 1 R R0 (6) with eair and e s respectively the air gap and an eventual other body (typically mold powder) thickness and air and s the air and the eventual other body thermal conductivity. R0 is a nominal heat resistance depending on the surface roughness, 1 Rrad 1 mold stef (T T 2 2 mold 1 )(T Tmold ) with mold the emissivity of the mold, R 1 A nm a heat resistance taking into account the normal stress n , A and m being the parameters of the law. Through (5), (6), the full thermal/mechanical coupling within the casting system is ensured. Indeed, the cooling of the solidifying alloy implies external shrinkage that creates air gap at ingot/mold interface. This air gap behaves as a local insulator and modifies heat exchanges locally in time and space between ingot and mold which in return modifies the cooling of the alloy and so the shrinkage. This is only possible because thermomechanical computation is performed and (5) is used as boundary condition. An a priori input of heat transfer coefficient does not allow this full coupling. Prediction of the defects and the structure of the cast product The strength of the above thermo-mechanical model allows combining different cast product health prediction models. Indeed, to the liquid/mushy models is associated a segregation model. To the mushy/solid models is associated a cracks/hot tears prediction model. This is possible thanks to the full coupling between liquid and solid behaviors considered via the mix of the dedicated thermomechanical models that are solved in the two steps model above (Fig. 6,7,8,9 and 10). Fig 6: illustration of the temperature distribution in four different instants of the filling. The horizontal line indicates the level of metal in the mold. The arrows demonstrate the movements of the liquid metal. Note the mold heating by the advancing metal during pouring. Fig. 7: Illustration of the final configuration of the calculation. One can notice the shape of the covering powder in the end of solidification which is deformed according to changes in the free surface of the ingot. On the right, the final shape of the ingot with the primary shrinkage. The radial symmetry of the ingot confirms that the cooling at inner side wall of the casting system has been calibrated and well controlled. Fig. 8: illustration of the distribution of the final temperature in the casting system. One can notice the non-continuity of the temperature at the interface between the ingot and the mold showing the recognition of the impact of the air gap on heat transfer. Indeed, the air gap acts as an insulator which slows down the evacuation of the heat energy from the ingot to the mold resulting in a temperature difference at ingot/mold interface (5). The air gap is particularly visible by the dark line that can be seen at that very interface. Fig. 9: illustration of the evolution of carbon segregations at different times of process. It may be noted that segregation begins as soon as the filling phase in liquid and mushy metal areas. Fig. 10: Illustration of the ferrostatic pressure in the liquid portion of the solidifying metal (left). The distribution of pressure in layers according to the height of the ingot (gravity direction) shows that the behavior of the liquid portion of the metal is fully taken into account in the calculation. The thin lines represent the mushy zone separating the liquid from the solid. Distribution of the first principal stress (right). Positive values mainly shows the tensile state of the areas. On the other hand, the absence of air space around the central sleeve indicates that the ingot is contracted mainly around the sleeve, a priori expected results in this configuration. Connection with forging phase The simulation of the complete chain of the making process involves that a lossless transfer between the casting and the forging steps is performed [10], [11], [12]. Only the fact that the two software are sharing the same core structure ensures such a fully compatibility of results. This transfer operation between the two products is therefore simple and natural way. Thanks to this coupling between the casting software and the forging one, the results at the end of solidification are transferred to the calculation of forging to start drawing pass with precise distributions. In particular, the criteria for porosity, segregation and concentrations of chemical elements are passed to forging software. It is therefore understood the value of such a coupling in tracking developments resulting from casting step. For example, the prediction of porosity closing in forging step will rely on a starting distribution that is the end of casting calculation (Fig.11). Similarly, by transferring concentrations of chemical elements, it will be possible to follow the carbon impoverished and enriched areas during all subsequent forging operations. For the treated case, the transfer operation will also consist in cutting the riser and feed channels of the mesh resulting from casting step. Then all of the mesh of the sleeve (360°) is performed by symmetrization. Fig. 11: Example and results transferred from casting software to forging during transition between the casting process and the forging process. On the left, areas of high risk of presence of porosities. On the right, the distribution of the carbon concentration at the end of solidification Forging step The incremental forging operations on the hollow ingot will allow to obtain the final geometry but also to impart metallurgical and mechanical properties to the piece. For example, one has to ensure that at the end of the forging porosities will be closed. These forging operations and their control therefore fall of great importance both in the quality and life of the final component and on the financial aspects. Also, it is easy to understand the strategic investment that represents the numerical simulation as an aid to design for the manufacture of this type of product: validation of the set of strokes, prediction of the number of heaters, dimensional prediction, prediction of mechanical and metallurgical properties. The hollow ingot will undergo two forging operations: a drawing operation on the mandrel to stretch from a length of 3m to 4m length while maintaining a certain thickness. Then an operation of becking to expand its diameter from 1800m to 2100m will be carried out. The drawing mandrel operation will also help closing the porosities potentially present at the end of solidification. Similarly to the casting software, the model used in the forging software to represent the material behavior is EVP. Thermal and mechanical phenomena are solved in a coupled manner. The drawing mandrel is comprised of a single pass, and 114 shots are given. Between each shot piece undergoes either a rotation or a translation. Similarly, a becking pass of 240 shots is made with a rotation of 20° of the ring between each blow. Given the high number of movements of the shell between shots, it is understandable that the difficulties of the numerical simulation for this type of process will be to communicate effectively all these movements to the workpiece; movement during which there is no plastic deformation. Note that is generally true for all open die forging processes. This is actually possible in the forging software through the use of a dedicated control file in which the details of each pass the number of strokes, movement and rotation of the part, the waiting time is specified. The link between the drawing simulation results and becking simulation is provided naturally through chaining operation. This ensures the transport of any thermo-mechanical history between the two steps of the forging process. Fig. 12 shows how the surface including areas with high risk of the presence of porosities, coming from casting process (Fig 11, left), is evolving in different stages of stretching, in the beginning, during and at the end. Numerical simulation allows to check the closure of porosities during the forging operation. Fig. 12: Evolution of the area (blue area) with high risk of porosity during drawing. Note that porosities are closed at the end of stretching. Fig. 13: illustration of the evolution of equivalent plastic strain at 50% (left) and in the end of the drawing (right) C=0,25 C=0,44 Fig. 14: Distribution of carbon in the end of drawing (carbon-depleted zone corresponds to the foot of the ingot and carbon-enriched zone corresponds to the top of the hollow ingot) and consideration of offset curves TRC. Along with the closure of porosities, Fig. 13 shows the evolution of the equivalent plastic strain during the process. It is interesting to remark that, if one would have considered the process starting from a full ingot, the situation would have been rather different from the present one. Indeed, the process would have requested a screwing step more. But, which would have been really different is the distribution of porosities at the beginning of the drawing step localized closed to the mandrel, almost at contact. This results from initial distribution into the full ingot that is at central axis. Now, if one considers the range of equivalent plastic strain Fig. 13 at mandrel contact area, it appears much lower than at intermediate level and much lower again than at outside surface. That means that closure of porosities localized at mandrel contact area requests a much higher forging power than the one in the present case. Consequently, if it is possible to reach the same level of final product quality starting from a full ingot, that needs more steps within the whole process, like screwing step and certainly machining process, hence higher costs. Monitoring concentration maps of different chemical elements from the solidification phase and during the drawing operation is ensured by the coupling between the two software. The distribution of chemical elements at the end of forging is determined so that allows a more accurate calculation of subsequent heat treatment operations. In this respect, Fig. 14 shows the distribution of carbon in the end of drawing, after being initialized by the distribution coming from casting phase (Fig 11, right), and the influence of the variation of the rate of carbon on the CCT diagram. As explained above, the automatic transfer from drawing to becking is carried out through a numerical chaining. Then the becking step is launched. Fig. 15 illustrates the distribution of temperature during this operation. Once the forging process completed, heat treatment can be also treated in the end of the becking operation, taking account the carbon distribution, this one being transported all over the process. Fig. 15: Distribution of temperature during the becking step of the process. Conclusion THERCAST®, a casting software, and FORGE®, a forging one, are both industrially used. They allow determining the thermo-mechanical behavior of the cooling metal in ingot casting and open die forging processes. This paper shows the interest of coupling between the two software, which is a powerful tool as an aid in the design of shells produced from hollow ring. This coupling provides a software solution to monitor the complete process chain, the prediction of porosities, segregations, concentrations of chemical elements during solidification to their evolution during the phases of forging. It gives a better understanding of the internal structure of the forged part. This example illustrates how nowadays numerical models could be used in the steel industry to improve the quality of production and the productivity. Moreover, one shows how the process starting from a hollow ingot in the shell making can be better than starting from rolled and welded sheets or full ingot. With such simulation tools, steel makers are able to control and optimize their process. Besides, this tool is thus evolving. Indeed, it is continuously enriched through the implementation of new models from applied research and adding new features. References [1] M. Bellet et al., Proc. Int. Conf. On Cutting Edge of Computer Simulation of Solidification and Casting, Osaka, The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, pp 173 – 190, 1999. [2] M. Bellet, V.D. Fachinotti, ALE method for solidification modelling, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. and Engrg. 193 (2004) 4355-4381. [3] O. Jaouen, Ph D. thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris, 1998. [4] F. Costes, Ph D. thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris, 2004. [5] M. Bellet et al, Proc. Int. Conf. On Cutting Edge of Computer Simulation of Solidification and Casting, Osaka, The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, pp 173 – 190, 1999. [6] M. Bellet, O. Boughanmi, G. Fidel, A partitioned resolution for concurrent fluid flow and stress analysis during solidification: application to ingot casting, Proc. MCWASP XIII, 13th Int. Conf. on Modelling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Schladming (Austria), June 17-22, 2012, A. Ludwig, M. Wu, A. Kharicha (eds.), IOP Conference Series 33 (2012) 012052, 6 pages [7] G. François, Ph D. thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris, 2011. [8] N. Triolet et al, The thermo-mechanical modeling of the steel slab continuous casting: a useful tool to adapt process actuators, ECCC 2005. [9] A. Kumar, M. Zaloznik, H. Combeau,International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 54, 33-47 (2012) [10] Jean-Loup Chenot et al., Advanced Numerical methods for F.E. Simulation of Metal Forming Process [11] Jean-Loup Chenot et al. Numerical Simulation and Optimization of the Forging Process, ICFC Proceedings [12] Patrice Lasne, Simulation in open die forging operations, Transvalor internal report (2009)
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz