A BALANCED LITERACY APPROACH FOR LANGUAGE LEARNERS March 12, 2015 ESOL and Dual Language Specialists A Balanced Literacy Approach for Language Learners Welcome and Introductions Ice Breaker Demonstration of GLAD Strategies Lunch (1 hour) Strategy Swap Group Presentations Formative Assessments Alternative Assessments Objective: Teachers will learn an instructional model that promotes language acquisition in a balanced literacy approach. EQ: How do we provide instructional strategies that will develop metacognitive use of academic language and literacy? Home Learning: Teachers will create a plan that develops metacognitive use of academic language and literacy using the GLAD model guided by the district curriculum framework. Integration: The interrelation of content and literacy that underscores research which shows that language is acquired most effectively when the emphasis of instruction and learning is on meaning rather than form. GLAD Model “The focus is the theme or content- the message. Language and concepts are acquired more effectively when they are presented in a meaningful context. Integration across the content areas provides meaningful context.” Bringing It All Together, Marcia Brechtel GLAD Model Project GLAD (Guided Language Acquisition Design) is a U.S. Department of Education Project of Academic Excellence. Today’s Demonstrations Big Idea: Organization and development of living things SC.1.L.14.3 Differentiate between living and nonliving things SC.1.L.14.1 Make observations of living things and their environment using the five senses. Focus/Motivation • Zero Noise Signal- non-verbal, lowers affective filter, distinct stop signal • Signal Word/ Term- reinforces new content vocabulary, sparks interest, offers multiple opportunities for oral practice of new terms in a safe environment • 3 Personal Standards- Make Good Decisions, Show Respect, Solve Problems • Literacy Reinforcers- Reward positive behaviors with learning, provides access to chunked text, fosters positive learning dispositions, leads to intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation CCD- Cognitive Content Dictionary Documents the academic words necessary for the content understanding Involves students in metacognition Builds vocabulary Aids in comprehension Includes pictures and diagrams CCD Cognitive Content Dictionaries Exploration Report/ Observation Chart Initial and formative assessments Gives indication of background knowledge Basis for scaffolding vocabulary and meaning of information for unit Collaborative; provides opportunities for language support from peers Revisited as the unit progresses and information is learned Exploration Reports 10 : 2 Reinforced by Long, Swain, and Cummins, who state that it is important to allow at least 2 minutes of student processing for every 10 minutes of teacher input Occurs between every GLAD activity or chunk of information Provides students the opportunity to process concepts Provides students the opportunity to practice language in a low risk environment Big Books Provide input for content standards Uses academic language in context Exposes students to the language structure of informational text Comprehensible to students at all English Language Proficiency (ELP) levels Big Books Sentence Patterning Charts Cooperative activity that embeds sentence structure instruction using content language Embedded scaffold technique that teaches language forms through content instruction Prepares students for language production about the content Sentence Patterning Charts Chants • Presents key concepts and vocabulary in context • Auditory and visual language patterning • Students gain familiarity and comfort using academic language in a low-risk environment • Chants are revisited often for a variety of purposes- many foundational skills can be taught with these chants; presents foundational skills embedded in context with meaning Chants Process Grid • Identifies key characteristics of a topic being studied • Facilitates comparison and contrasting • Aids in writing expository writing • Categorizes information • Teaches reading for information Process Grid Comparative Input Chart • Large charts that identify similarities or differences among things or ideas • Allows students to use academic language to label items or concepts around the illustration Comparative Input Chart Sentence Frames •Provide temporary assistance so the learner will be able to complete a similar task alone in the future •Serve as a means to reduce student anxiety about whether they are using correct English, which allows students to express thoughts and ideas that are more complex than their current English proficiency level •Especially useful with emergent writers to explicitly teach them the language structures needed to communicate their abstract and higher order thinking Sentence Frames Group Frame or Cooperative Strip Paragraph • Allows the teacher to model the conventions of writing • Planning can occur through sketching, mapping, or discussion • Group frame: students give dictation and teacher scribes • Cooperative Strip Paragraph: for groups where at least one person in the group is able to write the thoughts of the group • Teacher facilitates discussion using levels of questioning scaffolded to student’s ELP levels. • Revising and editing occurs as a collaborative process • Emphasis is on metacognition, the ease of revising, and how the writing often improves with suggestions from others • Can be used as guided or small group writing practice Strategies for Writing • Limit the use of prompts. When children are surrounded by meaningful language, prompts become unnecessary and limiting. • The “I do” should be short (about 5 minutes) and focused. Use shared or interactive writing to reinforce multiple writing skills. • Provide ample opportunities for students to practice writing. writing is imperative. Oral practice before • Encourage sketching (not drawing). “If sketching becomes a part of prewriting, both sides of the brain combine to produce language.”- Marcia Brechtel • Focus on the metacognitive aspect of writing during conferencing. • Encourage students to reflect on their own writing product through peer editing. • Allow for writing of all stages that are finished or unfinished to be shared and valued. FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT According to Students Language Proficiency Levels Standard: SC.1.L.14 (Organization and Development of Living Organisms) A. All plants and animals, including humans, are alike in some ways and different in others. B. All plants and animals, including humans, have internal parts and external structures that function to keep them alive and help them grow and reproduce. C. Humans can better understand the natural world through careful observation. Language Function: Comparing and Contrasting Stage: Pre-production Stage Sample Student Behavior Sample Teacher Behavior Questioning techniques Preand non verbal Points to and non Points verbaltoresponses. Gestures, language should Point to_____. production responses. focus on conveying Find the___________. produce oral language. Listens actively. meaning and vocabulary, Put the ______ next to the Understands moreMay notcan want to produce oral repetition, does not force _________. than produce. Gestures, languagelanguage. student to speak. you have the_______? should focus on conveying meaning and vocabulary,Do repetition, does not force Is this a__________? student to speak. Understands more than can Point to_____. produce. Who wants the _____? Find the___________. Who has the__________? Put the ______ next to the _________. Do you have the_______? Is this Source: TSL 4324 ESOL strategies for content area teachers, UF. HOTS: How are living things alike and different? SB: Student points or provides other non-verbal responses, actively listens, may be reluctant to speak, understands more than can produce. When designing formative assessments for our pre-production ELLs (1st grade), you should keep in mind their linguistic background and what can they already in their second language Question: how are living things alike and different? Then, think about how can our pre-production ELLs show they know given their language proficiency level? Here students at the preproduction level can mark (X) as they compare and contrast the characteristics of two different living things Living things They breath They move They reproduce by having babies Living 1: rabbit X X X Living 2: plants X X They They reproduce have by seeds roots or spores X X They have They can body see parts They have organs X X X X Stage: Early Production Stage Sample Student Behavior Sample Teacher Behavior Questioning techniques Early One or two utterances Points to and non verbal responses. Ask questions that can be Yes/no production Short responses answer by yes or no, and Either/or either/or. One word response produce oral language. Models correct responses General questions which Understands more than can produce. frames) encourage a list of words Gestures, language should focus on conveying(sentence meaning and vocabulary, repetition, does not force Asks short answer WH Two-word responses. student to speak. and HOTS questions Point to_____. Find the___________. Put the ______ next to the _________. Do you have the_______? Is this Source: TSL 4324 ESOL strategies for content area teachers, UF. HOTS: How are living things alike and different? SB: One or two utterances and short responses When designing formative assessments for our early-production ELLs (1st grade), you should keep in mind their linguistic background and what can they already do in their second language? Question: how are living things alike and different? Then, think about how can our early-production ELLs show they know given their language proficiency level? Source: http://preschoolscientist.blogspot.com/ Language Function: Comparing and Contrasting Using the Venn Diagram answer to the following questions: Are both plants and Animals living things? SR: Do plants and animals need oxygen, water, and minerals to survive? SR: Plants and animals both reproduce. Plants reproduce by___________. Animals reproduce by_____________. Stage: Speech Emergence Points to and non verbal responses. Stage Sample Student Behavior Sample Teacher Behavior Questioning techniques produce oral language. Understands more than can produce. Gestures, should meaning andonvocabulary, repetition, does not force Speech language Small groupsfocus on conveying Focuses content key Describe student to speak. Demonstrate comprehension in concepts. Emergence How….? Point to_____. a variety of ways. Provides frequent How is this like….? Find the___________. Speaks in short phrases and comprehension checks Tell me about… Put the ______ next to the _________. sentences Uses performance-based How would you change this Do you have the_______? Begins to use language more assessment part…? Is this freely Uses expanded vocabulary Asks open ended Source: and TSLstimulates 4324 ESOL strategies for content area teachers, UF. questions language production Stage: Intermediate Fluency Stage Sample Student Behavior Sample Teacher Behavior Questioning techniques Points to and non verbal responses. produce oral language. Intermediate Participates in reading writing Fosters conceptual Describe/compare Understands more than can produce. Fluency activities to acquire new development and expanded How are these similar how Gestures, language should focus on conveying meaning and vocabulary, repetition, does not force information literacy through content. are these different? student to speak. Continues to make lessons Why? Point to_____. Difficulties in abstract, cognitively demanding subjects comprehensible and Create… Find the___________. specially when a high degree of interactive. Put the ______ next to the _________. literacy is required Teaches thinking and study Do you have the_______? skills Is this Continues to be alert to individual differences in language and culture Source: TSL 4324 ESOL strategies for content area teachers, UF. Source: http://preschoolscientist.blogspot.com/ Living things Living things • Venn Diagram allows students to mediate the language demands. • Venn Diagram could be partially-filled and students could be asked to complete the rest of the information in the Venn diagram. Source: http://preschoolscientist.blogspot.com/ http://laura-armstrong-martinez.blogspot.com/2012/05/comparing-and-contrasting-plants-and.html Adding sentence frames to scaffold students writing language production They both can____________________________. They both need______________________________. They both have __________________________. They are different because ______________ can/have/need____________ , and ___________ can/have/need ________. ALTERNATIVE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS English Language Learners Why Use Alternative Assessments for ELLs? “English Language Learners (ELL) are capable of high levels of conceptual understanding related to science.” “Traditional means of assessment do not typically reflect their understanding of science content.” “While ELL students have difficulty writing in English, they can speak about science with a level of sophistication not reflected on written assignments.” Cox-Petersen & Olson (2007 ) http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=53299 Considerations when designing /selecting assessment for ELLs Ensure all activities/experiments align with benchmark objectives and cognitive complexity Scaffold accordingly Provide appropriate rigor across grade levels • Provide different assessment opportunities ─ Promotes accountability for ELLs during Science Academic English Language Sentence Frames - Language function (examples: compare and contrast, describing) Adapted from: http://www.colorincolorado.org/webcasts/assessment/ Performance-Based Assessment Oral Responses Dramatic Presentations Teacher observation of student work Science experiment Oral presentation on a book Projects Adapted from: http://www.ehow.com/list_6538126_types-alternative-assessment-schools.html Informal Assessment Methods Observations Checklists: student performance and behavior Anecdotal records: notes on a student Portfolios: capture student’s progress Sample of Informal Assessment: Checklist First Grade Science Standards Checklist x DATE STANDARD A. Living Things and Environments (Observations) SC.1.L.14.1) 1. 2. B. Living Things and Environments (SC.1.L.14.1) 1. 2. C. Living Things and Environments: Habitats (SC.1.L.14.1) 1. 2. D. Living Things and Environments: Turtles (SC.1.L.14.1)(SC.1.L.14.3) 1. 2. E. Parts of a Plant: Seeds (SC1.L.14.2) 1. 2. F. Parts of a Plant (SC.1.L.14.2) 1. 2. G. Living and Non Living(SC.1.L.14.3) 1. 2. Portfolio Assessment “Put it all together” Artifacts: Students select their own work samples to put in binder or book Graded using rubric or checklist Adapted from: http://www.ehow.com/list_6538126_types-alternative-assessment-schools.html Nonverbal Assessment Strategies "Physical Demonstration" Students can point or use other gestures Respond with thumbs up, thumbs down, or other nonverbal signs to true or false statements "Pictorial Products" Students can make drawings, dioramas, models, graphs, or charts Adapted from: http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content2/practical.assessment.4.html Rubric Assessment Method Scoring scale for task-specific criteria Assess quality of student work Measure student performance against a pre-determined set of criteria Contains the essential criteria for the task and appropriate levels of performance for each criterion Adapted from: http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=53299 Alternative Assessments for English Language Learners Drawings Over Time Compare and Contrast Scoring can be challenging Figure 1. A comparison of student drawings from November and June. November June Adapted from: http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=53299 Sample Rubric: Ocean Drawing 0 = No drawing or a drawing of one organism and the water surface 1 = Two or more animals, water surface 2 = Plants or the ocean floor, two or more animals 3 = Swimming and stationary animals, plants, and ocean floor 4 = Ocean floor with features, swimming and stationary animals, plants, most are accurately placed 5 = Extensive ocean floor features with appropriate organisms, many animals and plants, accurate placement, shows some relationships between organisms Adapted from: http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=53299 Rubric Example: Living and Non-Living Things 4 -Advance Talks and makes real life connections to organisms and their needs. Provides 5 examples of plant/animals and their basic needs. 3-Proficient Identifies the differences between living and non-living things. Identifies 4/5 basic needs of plants and animals. 2-Basic Identifies 3/5 basic needs of plants and animals. 1-Mininal Shows difficulty distinguishing between living and non-living things. Identifies 1/5 basic needs of plants and animals. Guidelines for Writing Anecdotal Records Useful for reporting progress and achievements Emphasizes "what a child can do and his or her achievements” Objective description of student behaviors Adapted from: http://www.slideshare.net/mbuurstra/observing-children-and-writing-anecdotal-records Group Activity In your groups provide four examples of : Appropriate Assessment
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz