NBTI and Spin Dependent Charge Pumping in 4H-SiC MOSFETs Mark A. Anders, Patrick M. Lenahan, Pennsylvania State University Aivars Lelis, US Army Research Laboratory Deviations from the resonance condition provide useful information about the nature of specific defects Energy Spin-Orbit Coupling: due to electron’s orbital angular momentum about the nucleus E h g g eHH+ mIA Electron-Nuclear Hyperfine Interaction: due to nearby nucleus with magnetic moment Magnetic Field At resonance, spin flips In the data shown, the factor most responsible for deviations from hv=geβH Bohr model: electron orbits nucleus; angular momentum n h (units of h). To an observer on the electron, it looks like the nucleus is orbiting the electron. The greater the nuclear charge and orbital angular momentum quantum number, the greater the spin orbit coupling. The orbiting nucleus looks like a current loop generating a magnetic field. This contribution is expressed in the g tensor. Problem Conventional EPR has a sensitivity of about 1010 total paramagnetic defects It is also sensitive to ALL paramagnetic defects in a sample 1. We want to identify defects in transistors 2. We want to know what different defects do to device performance A main problem for electronic materials science is performing resonance inside fully processed transistors in integrated circuits EDMR provides sensitivity about 7 orders of magnitude higher than conventional EPR Solution: EDMR, spin dependent recombination (SDR), and spin dependent trap-assisted tunneling (SDT) 5 6 What Are These Defects? Anticipated spectrum of the negatively charged silicon vacancy with the field parallel to the c-axis utilizing the hyperfine parameters of Isoya et al. J. Isoya, T. Umeda, N. Mizuochi, N. T. Son, E. Janzen, and T. Ohshima, Phys. Status Solidi B 245(7), 1298 (2008). 7 Silicon Vacancy Model Experimental Results 8 x5 Pre-stress x5 190oC x5 Post-stress • Hydrogen or Nitrogen related defect • At interface, bulk, or possibly oxide • Possible nitrogen related defect • At interface or bulk • Utilizing VDMOSFET geometry, we probe bulk defects • Biasing scheme: Source i – Strongly accumulate channel – Forward bias drain/body diode – “Bulk” recombination dominant current N+ P+ Gate -Vg N+ P N SiC Epi Source P+ Gate N+ N+ SiC substrate +++++ P accumulated channel Vd Drain 10 • 150, or 250, or 360 MHz (low field) vs. ~9.5 GHz (X-band) • Broadening due to g is field/frequency dependent • Broadening due to hyperfine interactions is field/frequency independent (to first order) Simulated using easyspin 11 X-band Low field • Previously, X-band measurements suggests broadening due to g or hyperfine • EDMR measurements at low field reveal that broadening is at least partially due to hyperfine interactions 12 • This technique is appropriate for levels around mid-gap. • It does not, however, address traps near the band edges. • We are interested in what’s happening near the conduction band and valence band. • Spin dependent charge pumping: a solution. 13 By utilizing a pulse wave at the gate voltage, we can explore more of the band gap with larger amplitude. 14 G oxide S D n+ n+ p Gate Voltage Waveform Generator … time (Vary b Voltage) (b) (c) EF EF Fill Traps c c 𝑖 EF a b b semiconductor (a) a a Allow time for traps above EF to empty Flood interface with holes to recombine with interface trap electrons Enhanced sensitivity (2000x greater) NO-annealed pMOSFET • Probing states throughout most of the bandgap shows a different line shape and broader center line compared to only mid-gap states 17 BAE SDCP • The “full bandgap” spectra have g-values much lower than the “mid-gap” spectra in this sample • Mid gap (BAE) spectra are mostly due to silicon vacancy 18 350 MHz c-axis parallel to magnetic field ~9.5 GHz c-axis parallel to magnetic field • C-axis is parallel to magnetic field • NO annealed nMOSFET has broader shoulders than an nMOSFET which did not receive an NO anneal • Many abundant magnetic nuclei, likely nitrogen, would cause broadening 19 350 MHz ~9.5 GHz • NO annealed nMOSFET has a broader center line at both high and low fields • Many abundant magnetic nuclei, likely nitrogen, would cause broadening 20 ~9.5 GHz • The NO annealed device spectra is much broader than the non-NO device spectra • More evidence for Nitrogen hyperfine interactions 21 C dangling bond: g //c = 2.0023 g⊥c = 2.0032 J. L. Cantin et al. If carbon dangling bonds largely contributed to the interface state density, we would observe a line at g //c = 2.0023 and g⊥c = 2.0032. We do not. There are no carbon dangling bonds at the interface. 22 Non-NO nMOSFET 23 Non-NO nMOSFET • Side peak amplitudes are reduced • Defect responsible for side peaks are not near the conduction band edge 24 w/out NO nMOSFET NO nMOSFET • Lower charge pumping frequencies probe further into the oxide • Could provide a way to look a little into the gate oxide • More work needs to be done to fully understand multi-frequency SDCP results 25 Low -field EDMR: GaN p-n diode The complex spectra is clearly due to hyperfine interactions 26 EDMR Amplitude vs Gate Bias EDMR amplitude of several different spectrum peaks Calculated recombination current 27
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz