Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste Vol. XXXVIII, 1–15 (2006) A General View to Classification of Almost Hermitian Manifolds Mehmet Tekkoyun (∗) Summary. - In this paper, firstly, we obtain the higher order vertical and complete lifts of type (1,1) and type (0,2) by means of lifted geometric structures on extended complex manifolds. Then using higher order lifting theory, we generalize the classification of almost Hermitian manifolds M to the extended complex manifolds k M . 1. Introduction and notations In studies before, the classes of almost Hermitian manifolds M had been given as follows: Kähler manifolds Nearly Kähler manifolds Almost Kähler manifolds Quasi Kähler manifolds Hermitian manifolds Semi Kähler manifolds : : : : : : [∇X J0 ] Y = 0 [∇X , J0 ] X = 0 dΦ = 0 [∇J0 X , J0 ] = −J0 [∇X , J0 ] [∇ PJm0 X , J0 ] = J0 [∇X , J0 ] {∇Ei (J0 )Ei + ∇J0 Ei (J0 )J0 Ei } = 0 i=1 for all X, Y ∈ χ(M ), where χ(M ) denotes the lie algebra of C ∞ vector fields on M, ∇ the Riemannian connection, J0 the almost complex structure, Φ the fundamental 2-form, and {Ei , J0 Ei } a local orthonormal frame field [1, 2]. Lifts of complex structures on Hermitian and Kähler manifolds and the first order lift classes of the classes given in [4] were studied. (∗) Author’s address: Mehmet Tekkoyun, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences , Pamukkale University, 20070 Denizli, Turkey; E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Complex Structure, Complex Manifold,Extensions,Lifting Theory AMS Subject Classification: 32Q60, 32Q35, 20K35, 28A51 2 MEHMET TEKKOYUN The paper is structured as follows. In section 2, firstly we recall extended complex manifold and give higher order vertical and complete lifts of differential objects a complex manifold to extended complex manifold [3, 5]. Then higher order lifts of an almost complex structure will be obtained. In sections 3 and 4, we obtain the vertical and complete lifts of complex tensor fields of type (1,1) and type (0,2) defined on any complex manifold M to extended complex manifolds. In section 5, we give definitions about higher order vertical and complete lifts of a Hermitian metric and Kähler form defined on a complex manifold M to its extensions. In section 6 it is generalized the classification of almost Hermitian manifolds M to the extended complex manifolds k M. Along this study, all mappings and manifolds will be assumed to be of class C ∞ and the sum is taken over repeated indices. Also, v (resp. c) denotes the vertical (resp. complete) lift of any differentiable geometric complex structure defined on extended complex manifolds k−1 M to k M . 2. Preliminaries 2.1. Extended complex manifolds Let k M be extension of order k of manifold M. A tensor field Jk on k M is called an extended almost complex structure on k M if at every point p of k M, Jk is endomorphism of the tangent space Tp (k M ) such that (Jk )2 = −I. An extended manifold k M with fixed extended almost complex structure Jk is called extended almost complex manifold. If k = 0, J0 is called almost complex structure and the manifold M with fixed almost complex structure J0 is called almost complex manifold. Let (xri , y ri ) be a real coordinate system on a neighborhood k U of any point p of k M . In this case, it is respectively defined by { ∂x∂ri p , ∂y∂ri } and { dxri p , dy ri p } natural bases over R of tangent p space Tp (k M ) and cotangent space Tp∗ (k M ) of k M. Let k M be extended almost complex manifold with fixed extended almost complex structure Jk . Then k M n is called extended o k k complex manifold if there exists an open covering U of M sat- CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 3 isfying the following condition: There is a local coordinate system (xri , y ri ) on each k U, such that Jk ( ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ) = ri , Jk ( ri ) = − ri , ri ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x (1) for each point of k U. If k = 0, then a manifold M with fixed canonical almost complex structure J0 is called complex manifold. Let (z ri , z ri ) be an extended complex local coordinate system on a√ neighborhood k U of any point p of k M where z ri = xri +i y ri , i= −1. The real dimension of k M is equal to 2(k+1)m. Therefore, these coordinates are locally defined by xri , y ri :k M → R(k+1)m ,∀A, A ∈k M, A = ari +i bri , xri (A) = ari , y ri (A) = bri and z ri , z ri :k M → C(k+1)m , z ri (A) = A, z ri (A) = A. We define the vector fields ∂ ∂ 1 ∂ ∂ 1 ∂ ∂ = { − i ri }, ri = { ri + i ri } ∂z ri p 2 ∂xri p ∂y p ∂z p 2 ∂x p ∂y p (2) and the dual covector fields dz ri = dxri + i dy ri , dz ri = dxri − i dy ri p p p p p p (3) which represent bases of the tangent space Tp (k M ) and cotangent space Tp∗ (k M ) of k M respectively. Then the endomorphism Jk is given as: ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ Jk ( ri ) = i ri , Jk ( ri ) = −i ri (4) ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z In this study, we recall the higher order vertical and complete lifts of functions, vector fields, 1-forms on M to k M given in [3]. Then we obtain higher order vertical and complete lifts of complex tensor fields of type (1,1) and of type (0,2) defined on M to k M. Throughout the paper, all mappings and manifolds are assumed to be differentiable of class C ∞ and the sum is taken over repeated indices. 4 MEHMET TEKKOYUN 2.2. Higher order lifts of complex structures In this section, we recall extensions of definitions and properties about vertical and complete lifts of complex geometrical structures defined on a complex manifold M to extended manifolds k M . The vertical lift of function f ∈ F( M ) to k M is the function k f v on k M such that k f v = f ◦ τ0 M ◦ τ1 M ◦ ... ◦ τk−1 M . (5) where, for any h ∈ {1, 2, ..., k − 1}, τh : T (h M ) →h M denotes k the canonical projection. The function f c ∈ F(k M ) such that k−1 f k−1 . ri ∂f c ∂f c v )v . ) + =z ( z ( ∂z ri ∂z ri . ri ck (6) is called complete lift of function f to k M. The vertical and k k complete lifts of Z to k M are the complex vector fields Z v and Z c on k M such that k k k k k Z v (f c ) = (Zf )v and Z c (f c ) = (Zf )c k (7) Proposition 2.1. Let M be a complex manifold and k M its k order extended complex manifold. If the complex vector field Z defined on M is taken by ∂ 0i ∂ , Z = Z 0i 0i + Z ∂z ∂z 0i the vertical and complete lifts of Z to Zv k = (Z 0i )v and Zc k = k k M are ∂ 0i k ∂ + (Z )v ki ∂z ∂z ki ! (8) ! k−r r ∂ k k 0i k−r r ∂ (Z 0i )v c + (Z )v c . ri r r ∂z ∂z ri The vertical and complete lifts of ω ∈ χ∗ ( M ) to k k complex 1-forms ω v and ω c on k M determined by k k k k k k k ω v (Z c ) = (ωZ)v and ω c (Z c ) = (ωZ)c . M are the (9) CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 5 Proposition 2.2. Let k M be extension of order k of complex manifold M . If the complex 1-form ω defined on M is given ω = ω0i dz 0i + ω 0i dz 0i , the vertical and complete lifts of ω to ωv k k M are k k (ω0i )v dz 0i + (ω 0i )v dz 0i = and ω ck (10) ck−r vr = (ω0i ) ck−r vr dz ri + (ω 0i ) dz ri . 3. Higher order lifts of complex tensor fields of type (1,1) In this section, we obtain the definitions and properties about vertical and complete lifts of a complex tensor field of type (1,1) defined on any complex manifold M to extended complex manifolds k M . Let M be any complex manifold and k−1 M its (k − 1) order extended complex manifold. Denote by Fe a complex tensor field of type (1,1) and by Ze be a complex vector field defined on k−1 M. Then the vertical lift of a complex tensor field of type (1,1) Fe ∈ ℑ11 (k−1 M ) to k M is the structure Fe v ∈ ℑ11 (k M ) such that e v. Fe v (Ze c ) = (Fe Z) (11) k−1 k−1 and F v be respectively complete and vertical Now, let Z c lifts of a complex vector field Z ∈ χ(M ) and a complex tensor field of k−1 k−1 and Fe = F v , type (1,1) F ∈ ℑ11 (M ) to k−1 M. In (11), if Ze = Z c k then the vertical lift of F ∈ ℑ11 (M ) to k M is the tensor field F v on k M such that k k k (12) F v (Z c ) = (F Z)v . Local components of vertical lift of a complex tensor field 0i F = F0j ∂ 0i ∂ ⊗ dz 0j + F 0j 0i ⊗ dz 0j 0i ∂z ∂z (13) ∂ 0i k ∂ ⊗ dz 0j , ⊗ dz 0j + (F 0j )v ki ∂z ∂z ki (14) are k 0i v ) F v = (F0j k 6 MEHMET TEKKOYUN i.e., F where vk : K: K 0 0 K ! 0 .. . 0 0i )v i(F0j k 0 ··· 0 .. .. . . 0 ··· 0 0 ... 0 and K is the conjugate of K. If F is taken as complex structure J0 = then it is k J0v where : 0 . .. H : 0 iIm (15) H 0 0 H ! ∂ ∂z 0i ⊗ dz 0j + ∂z∂0i ⊗ dz 0j , (16) , 0 ... 0 .. .. . . 0 ... 0 0 ... 0 and H is the conjugate of H. Vertical lift of order k of complex structure J0 is tangent structure k k on M such that (J0v )2 = 0. Let M be a complex manifold and k−1 M its (k−1) order extended complex manifold. Denote by Fe a complex tensor field of type (1,1) and by Ze a complex vector field defined on k−1 M. Then the complete lift of Fe ∈ ℑ11 (k−1 M ) to k M is the complex tensor field Fe c ∈ ℑ11 (k M ) such that k−1 e c. Fe c (Ze c ) = (Fe Z) k−1 (17) and F c be respectively complete lifts of a comNow, let Z c plex vector field Z ∈ χ(M ) and a complex tensor field of type (1,1) k−1 k−1 and Fe = F c , then F ∈ ℑ11 (M ) to k−1 M. In (17), if Ze = Z c k the complete lift of F ∈ ℑ11 (M ) to k M is the tensor field F c on k M such that k k k (18) F c (Z c ) = (F Z)c . CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 7 The local components of the complete lift of a complex tensor field expressed as in (13) are Fc k ∂ 0i vk ∂ ⊗ dz 0j + (F0j ) ⊗ dz 0j + ki ∂z ∂z 0i 0i k ∂ 0i vk ∂ ⊗ dz 0j + +(F0j ) ⊗ dz kj + (F 0j )c ki ∂z ki ∂z 0i vk ∂ 0i vk ∂ 0j +(F 0j ) ⊗ dz + (F 0j ) ⊗ dz kj , ∂z 0i ∂z ki 0i c = (F0j ) k (19) i.e., F ck L 0 0 L : ! (20) , where ! k 0i vk c0 i 0 (F0j ) . . L: ! . k 0i )v0 ck i (F0j k 0 . . . . . . ! k 0i )vk c0 i (F0j k and L is the conjugate of L. If F is taken as complex structure J0 = ∂z∂0i ⊗ dz 0j + ∂z∂0i ⊗ dz 0j , then complete lift of order k of complex structure J is J0 : where T : 0 T T 0 ck ! iIm and T is the conjugate of T . 0 . . 0 (21) , . iIm 8 MEHMET TEKKOYUN Complete lift of order k of complex structure J0 is complex struck ture on k M such that (J0c )2 = −I. The higher order vertical and complete lifts of a complex tensor field of type (1,1) on any complex manifold M obey the following generic properties k k F v (Z v ) = 0 k k k k k F v (Z c ) = F c (Z v ) = (F Z)v k k k F c (Z c ) = (F Z)c , i) ii) iii) for all Z ∈ χ(M ) and F ∈ ℑ11 (M ). 4. Higher order lifts of complex tensor fields of type (0,2) In this section, we obtain the definitions and properties about vertical and complete lifts of a complex tensor field of type (0,2) defined on any complex manifold M to extended complex manifolds k M . Let M be any complex manifold and k−1 M its (k − 1) order e be a tensor field of type (0,2) and extended complex manifold. Let G e f Z, W be complex vector fields defined on k−1 M. Then the vertical lift e v ∈ ℑ0 (k M ) e ∈ ℑ0 (k−1 M ) to k M is the tensor field of type (0,2) G of G 2 2 such that e v (Z ec, W f c ) = G( e Z, e W f )v . G (22) k−1 k−1 k−1 and Gv be respectively complete and Now, let Z c , W c vertical lifts of complex vector fields Z, W ∈ χ(M ) and a tensor field k−1 f = W ck−1 of type (0,2) G ∈ ℑ02 (M ) to k−1 M. In (22), if Ze = Z c , W e = Gvk−1 , then the vertical lift of G ∈ ℑ0 (M ) to k M is the and G 2 k tensor field of type (0,2) Gv ∈ ℑ02 (k M ) such that k k k k Gv (Z c , W c ) = (G(Z, W ))v . (23) Local components of vertical lift of a complex tensor field g = g0i0j dz 0i ⊗ dz 0j + g0i0j dz 0i ⊗ dz 0j are (24) CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 9 k k k gv = (g0i0j )v dz 0i ⊗ dz 0j + (g0i0j )v dz 0i ⊗ dz 0j , (25) i.e., g where vk 0 M : (g0i0j )v 0 .. . M : k 0 M 0 ! (26) , 0 ... 0 0 ··· 0 .. .. . . 0 ··· 0 and M is the conjugate of M. e ∈ ℑ0 (k−1 M ) to k M is the tensor We say the complete lift of G 2 k c 0 e field of type (0,2) G ∈ ℑ2 ( M ) such that k−1 k−1 e c (Z ec, W f c ) = G( e Z, e W f )c . G (27) k−1 and Gc be respectively complete lifts of comLet Z c , W c plex vector fields Z, W and a tensor field of type (0,2) G ∈ ℑ02 (M ) k−1 f = W ck−1 and defined on M to k−1 M. In (27), if Ze = Z c , W e = Gck−1 , then the complete lift of G ∈ ℑ0 (M ) to k M is the tensor G 2 k field of type (0,2) Gc on k M such that k k k k Gc (Z c , W c ) = (G(Z, W ))c . (28) Local components of vertical lift of a complex tensor field g given in (24) are gc k k k = (g0i0j )c dz 0i ⊗ dz 0j + (g0i0j )v dz ki ⊗ dz 0j k k k k +(g0i0j )v dz 0i ⊗ dz kj + (g0i0j )c dz 0i ⊗ dz 0j (29) +(g0i0j )v dz ki ⊗ dz 0j + (g0i0j )v dz 0i ⊗ dz kj i.e., g ck : 0 N N 0 ! , (30) 10 MEHMET TEKKOYUN where ! k k (g0i0j )c 0 .. . ! ··· k k−r r (g0i0j )c v N : r .. . ! k vk k ! k−r r k (g0i0j )c v · · · r ! k k (g0i0j )v k 0 (g0i0j ) and N is the conjugate of N. The general properties of higher order vertical and complete lifts of complex tensor fields of type (0,2) on complex manifold M are i) ii) iii) k k k Gv (Z v , W v ) k k k Gc (Z c , W v ) k k k Gc (Z c , W c ) = = = 0 k k k k k k k Gc (Z v , W c ) = Gv (Z c , W c ) = (G(Z, W ))v k (G(Z, W ))c , for all Z, W ∈ χ(M ) and G ∈ ℑ02 (M ). 5. Higher order lifts of hermitian metric and Kähler form In this section, we give definitions about higher order vertical and complete lifts of an Hermitian metric and Kähler form defined on any complex manifold M to extended complex manifolds k M . In order to define higher order vertical and complete lifts of an Hermitian metric defined on M , we first define higher order vertical and complete lifts of complex tensor fields of type (0,2). Let M be any complex manifold and k−1 M its (k − 1) order e be a tensor field of type (0,2) and extended complex manifold. Let G e f Z, W be complex vector fields defined on k−1 M. Then the vertical e to k M is the tensor field of type (0,2) G e v on k M such that lift of G k−1 e v (Z ec, W f c ) = G( e Z, e W f )v . G k−1 k−1 (31) and Gv be respectively complete and Now, let Z c , W c vertical lifts of complex vector fields Z, W and a tensor field of type CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 11 k−1 k−1 f = Wc (0,2) G defined on M to k−1 M. In (31), if Ze = Z c , W k−1 e = Gv , then the vertical lift of G to k M is the tensor field and G k of type (0,2) Gv on k M such that k k k k Gv (Z c , W c ) = (G(Z, W ))v . (32) Given a Hermitian metric g and an almost complex structure J0 defined on any complex manifold M. Since g is a tensor field of type (0,2), we have equality k k k k k k k k gv (Z c , W c ) = gv (J0c Z c , J0c W c ). (33) for any complex vector fields Z, W on M. Hence we call the vertical lift of g to extended complex manifold k M as Hermitian metric k gv on k M. extended complex manifold k M with fixed Hermitian metk ric gv is called vertical lift of order k of Hermitian manifold which is complex manifold M with fixed Hermitian metric g. e to k M is the tensor field of We say that the complete lift of G c k e on M such that type (0,2) G k−1 k−1 e c (Z ec, W f c ) = G( e Z, e W f )c . G (34) k−1 and Gc be respectively complete lifts of comLet Z c , W c plex vector fields Z, W and a tensor field of type (0,2) G defined on k−1 e = Gck−1 , then f = W ck−1 and G M to k−1 M. In (34), if Ze = Z c , W k the complete lift of G to k M is the tensor field of type (0,2) Gc on k M given by equality k k k k Gc (Z c , W c ) = (G(Z, W ))c . (35) Given a Hermitian metric g and an almost complex structure J0 defined on any complex manifold M. Since g is a tensor field of type (0,2), we have equality k k k k k k k k gc (Z c , W c ) = gc (J0c Z c , J0c W c ). (36) for any complex vector fields Z, W on M. Hence we call the k complete lift of g to extended complex manifold k M as gc on k M. k extended complex manifold k M with fixed Hermitian metric gc is 12 MEHMET TEKKOYUN called complete lift of order k of Hermitian manifold which is complex manifold M with fixed Hermitian metric g. Given a Kähler form Φ, Hermitian metric g and an almost complex structure J0 defined on any Hermitian manifold M. Since Φ is a complex tensor field of type (0,2), we have equality k k k k k k k Φv (Z c , W c ) = gv (Z c , J0c W c ) (37) for any complex vector fields Z, W on M. Hence we call the vertik cal lift of Φ to extended complex manifold k M as Kähler form Φv on k M. In this way we shall definition the following. Given a Kähler form Φ,Hermitian metric g and an almost complex structure J0 defined on any Hermitian manifold M. Since Φ is a complex tensor field of type (0,2), we have equality k k k k k k k Φc (Z c , W c ) = gc (Z c , J0c W c ) (38) for any complex vector fields Z, W on M. Hence we call the complete lift of Φ to extended complex manifold k M as Kähler form k Φc on k M. Now, let define the complete lift to k M of an Affine connection ▽ on M for using in Section 6. So, we extend using induction method the properties about vertical and complete lifts of complex tensor fields given the following such that all X, Y, Z ∈ ℑ10 (M ), f ∈ ℑ00 (M ), ω ∈ ℑ01 (M ), K ∈ ℑrs (M ) : i) ii) k k fv X vk k k ▽c v k f c X k k ▽c ck f c X k k ▽c v k Y v X k k ▽c v k Y c X k k ▽c ck Y c X ▽c = 0, = ▽c k X ck k k f v = (▽X f )v , = (▽X f )c k = 0, = ▽c k X ck k k Y v = (▽X Y )v , = (▽X Y )c k CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 13 k k ωv X vk k k ▽c v k ω c X k k ▽c ck ω c X k k ▽c v k K v X k k ▽c v k K c X k k ▽c ck K c X ▽c iii) iv) = 0, = ▽c k X ck k k ω v = (▽X ω)v , = (▽X ω)c k = 0, = ▽c k X ck k k K v = (▽X K)v , = (▽X K)c k 6. Classification of extended almost Hermitean manifold In this section we may generalize the classification made for almost Hermitian manifold to extended almost Hermitian manifolds using lift theory as follows. Proposition 6.1. Let M be a Kähler manifold with almost comk plex structure J0 . Then the extended manifold (k M, J0c ) is a Kähler manifold. Proof. Given by complex vector fields Z, W and by J0 almost comk k plex structure on any Kähler manifold M . Also, let Z c , W c , and k J0c be respectively complete lifts of this tensor fields to extended complex manifold k M. Then we have h k ▽cZ ck , J0c k i Wc k k k k k k = ▽cZ ck (J0c W c ) − J0c ▽cZ ck W c = ([▽Z , J0 ] W )c k k = 0. Finally, the proof is completed. Proposition 6.2. Let M be a nearly Kähler manifold with almost k complex structure J0 . Then the extended manifold (k M, J0c ) is a nearly Kähler manifold. Proof. We easily make as similar the proof of proposition 6.1. 14 MEHMET TEKKOYUN Proposition 6.3. Let M be an almost Kähler manifold with almost k complex structure J0 . Then the extended manifold (k M, J0c ) is an almost Kähler manifold. Proof. For any 2-form ω, one has: 3dω(X, Y, Z) = (∇X ω)(Y, Z) + (∇Y ω)(Z, X) + (∇Z ω)(X, Y ). (39) So, we consider an almost Kähler manifold (M, g, J0 ) with fundamenk k k k k tal form Φ. Since (∇c ck Φc )(Y c , Z c ) = ((∇X Φ)(Y, Z))c (which X follows from iv) in Section 5, using eq. (39), we get: k k k k k dΦc (X c , Y c , Z c ) = (dΦ(X, Y, Z))c . Then one proves the statement, since Φ is closed, M being almost Kähler. Proposition 6.4. Let M be a quasi Kähler manifold with almost k complex structure J0 . Then the extended manifold (k M, J0c ) is a quasi Kähler manifold. Proof. Given by Z, W complex vector fields and by J0 almost comk k plex structure on any quasi Kähler manifold M . Also, let Z c , W c , k and J0c be respectively complete lifts of this tensor fields to extended complex manifold k M. Then we have k k ▽c ck ck , J0c J0 Z Wc k k k k Jc W c J 0 Z ck 0 = ▽c ck k k − J0c ▽c ck J 0 Z ck = (▽J0 Z J0 W − J0 ▽J0 Z W )c = ([▽J0 Z , J0 ] W )c = −J0c k ▽cZ ck , J0c k k k = (−J0 [▽Z , J0 ] W )c h k Wc i k k . Hence, the proof is finished. Proposition 6.5. Let M be a Hermitian manifold with almost comk plex structure J0 . Then the extended manifold (k M, J0c ) is a Hermitian manifold. CLASSIFICATION OF ALMOST HERMITIAN MANIFOLDS 15 Proof. We easily make as similar the proof of proposition 6.4. Proposition 6.6. Let M be a Semi Kähler manifold with almost k complex structure J0 . Then the extended manifold (k M, J0c ) is a Semi Kähler manifold. Proof. Given a local orthonormal frame {Ei , J0 Ei }1≤i≤m , one has: k k k k ▽c ck (J0c )Eic +▽c ck Ei k J0 Eic k k k (J0c )J0c Eic = (▽Ei (J0 )Ei +▽J0 Ei (J0 )J0 Ei ), for any i ∈ {1, ..., m}. Therefore, if M is Semi Kähler , k M is Semi Kähler. References [1] J.J. Etayo, Derivations in the tangent bundle. Differential geometry (Peñı́scola, 1982), 43–52, Lecture Notes in Math., 1045, Springer, Berlin, 1984. [2] A. Gray, Curvature identities for hermitian and almost hermitian manifolds, Tôhoku Math. Journ. 28 (1976), 601-612. [3] M. Tekkoyun, The higher order lifts of lagrangian and hamiltonian equations to the extended Kähler manifolds, Ph.D. Thesis, Osmangazi Univ., Eskişehir (2002). [4] M. Tekkoyun and Ş. Civelek, On lifts of structures on complex manifolds, Differential Geometry-Dynamics Systems (DGDS), 5 n. 1 (2003), 59-64. [5] M. Tekkoyun, Ş. Civelek and A. Görgülü, Higher order lifts of complex structures, Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste, vol. XXXVI (2004), 85-95. [6] K. Yano and S. Ishihara, Tangent and cotangent bundles, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1973). Received May 20, 2005.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz