Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Primary Division Released 2015 Assessment: Mathematics Item-Specific Rubrics and Sample Student Responses with Annotations EQAO, 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9 • 1-888-327-7377 • Web site: www.eqao.com • © 2011 Queen’s Printer for Ontario EQAO, 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9 • 1-888-327-7377 • Web site: www.eqao.com • © 2011 Queen’s Printer for Ontario EQAO, 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9 • 1-888-327-7377 • Web site: www.eqao.com • © 2015 Queen’s Printer for Ontario Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 8 Code B I Descriptor Blank: nothing written or drawn in response to the question Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out/erased; not written in English Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question (e.g., comment on the task, drawings, “?”, “!”, “I don’t know”) Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question 10 Application of knowledge and skills to interpret data from a pictograph and display the data in a bar graph shows limited effectiveness due to 20 Application of knowledge and skills to interpret data from a pictograph and display the data in a bar graph shows some effectiveness due to 30 partial understanding of the concepts errors and/or omissions in the application of the procedures Application of knowledge and skills to interpret data from a pictograph and display the data in a bar graph shows considerable effectiveness due to 40 misunderstanding of concepts incorrect selection or misuse of procedures an understanding of most of the concepts minor errors and/or omissions in the application of the procedures Application of knowledge and skills to interpret data from a pictograph and display the data in a bar graph shows a high degree of effectiveness due to a thorough understanding of the concepts an accurate application of the procedures (any minor errors and/or omissions do not detract from the demonstration of a thorough understanding) Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 8 Code 10 Annotation: Response demonstrates misuse of procedures; the scale is not extended, but labels are included (above bars) and the data from the pictograph is inaccurately represented (no bars correct). Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 8 Code 20 Annotation: Response demonstrates errors in the application of the procedures; the scale is extended correctly, with correct labels included and two bars (Elephant and Penguin) from the pictograph are accurately represented. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 8 Code 30 Annotation: Response demonstrates a minor error in the application of the procedures; the scale is extended correctly, with correct labels included and three bars (Monkey, Elephant and Penguin) from the pictograph are accurately represented. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 8 Code 40 Annotation: Response demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concepts; the scale is extended correctly, with correct labels included and all four bars from the pictograph are accurately represented. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 9 Code Descriptor B I 10 Blank: nothing written or drawn in response to the question Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out/erased; not written in English Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question (e.g., comment on the task, drawings, “?”, “!”, “I don’t know”) Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Thinking process to determine how much larger the area of Playground A is than the area of Playground B shows limited effectiveness due to minimal evidence of a solution process limited identification of important elements of the problem too much emphasis on unimportant elements of the problem no conclusions presented conclusion presented without supporting evidence Thinking process to determine how much larger the area of Playground A is than the area of Playground B shows some effectiveness due to 20 an incomplete solution process identification of some of the important elements of the problem some understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem simple conclusions with little supporting evidence Thinking process to determine how much larger the area of Playground A is than the area of Playground B shows considerable effectiveness due to 30 a solution process that is nearly complete identification of most of the important elements of the problem a considerable understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem appropriate conclusions with supporting evidence Thinking process to determine how much larger the area of Playground A is than the area of Playground B shows a high degree of effectiveness due to 40 a complete solution process identification of all important elements of the problem a thorough understanding of the relationships between all of the important elements of the problem appropriate conclusions with thorough and insightful supporting evidence Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 9 Code 10 Annotation: Response demonstrates minimal evidence of a solution process; no totals shown for either playground (26 is not the correct area for either playground) with incorrect conclusion (26). Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 9 Code 20 Annotation: Response demonstrates some understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem; correctly determines the area of one playground (20 for Playground B) with incorrect conclusion (difference not calculated). Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 9 Code 30 Annotation: Response demonstrates a considerable understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem; correctly determines the area of one playground (20 for Playground B) and correct conclusion based on error (5). Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 9 Code 40 Annotation: Response demonstrates identification of all important elements of the problem; correctly determines the areas for both playgrounds (24 and 20) with correct difference (4) shown. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 10 Code Descriptor B I 10 Blank: nothing written or drawn in response to the question Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out/erased; not written in English Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question (e.g., comment on the task, drawings, “?”, “!”, “I don’t know”) Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Thinking process to add and subtract two-digit numbers and determine the number of items the boys collected shows limited effectiveness due to minimal evidence of a solution process limited identification of important elements of the problem too much emphasis on unimportant elements of the problem no conclusions presented conclusion presented without supporting evidence Thinking process to add and subtract two-digit numbers and determine the number of items the boys collected shows some effectiveness due to 20 an incomplete solution process identification of some of the important elements of the problem some understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem simple conclusions with little supporting evidence Thinking process to add and subtract two-digit numbers and determine the number of items the boys collected shows considerable effectiveness due to 30 a solution process that is nearly complete identification of most of the important elements of the problem a considerable understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem appropriate conclusions with supporting evidence Thinking process to add and subtract two-digit numbers and determine the number of items the boys collected shows a high degree of effectiveness due to 40 a complete solution process identification of all important elements of the problem a thorough understanding of the relationships between all of the important elements of the problem appropriate conclusions with thorough and insightful supporting evidence Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 10 Code 10 Annotation: Response demonstrates minimal evidence of a solution process; total number of items given not determined and adds the number of items the boys collected on Monday (19) to the total number of items. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 10 Code 20 Annotation: Response demonstrates an incomplete solution process; correctly determines the total number of items given (46) but the number of items needed to reach 50 (4) is not determined. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 10 Code 30 Annotation: Response demonstrates a considerable understanding of the relationships between important elements of the problem; correctly determines the total number of items given (46) but minor calculation error (5) in determining the number of items needed to reach 50. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 10 Code 40 Annotation: Response demonstrates a complete solution process; correctly determines the total number of items given (46) and the number of items needed to reach 50 (4). Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 11 Code Descriptor B I Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out/erased; not written in English Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question (e.g., comment on the task, drawings, “?”, “!”, “I don’t know”) Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Application of knowledge and skills to determine the number of lines of symmetry on four letters shows limited effectiveness due to 10 misunderstanding of concepts incorrect selection or misuse of procedures Application of knowledge and skills to determine the number of lines of symmetry on four letters shows some effectiveness due to 20 partial understanding of the concepts errors and/or omissions in the application of the procedures Application of knowledge and skills to determine the number of lines of symmetry on four letters shows considerable effectiveness due to 30 an understanding of most of the concepts minor errors and/or omissions in the application of the procedures Application of knowledge and skills to determine the number of lines of symmetry on four letters shows a high degree of effectiveness due to 40 Blank: nothing written or drawn in response to the question a thorough understanding of the concepts an accurate application of the procedures (any minor errors and/or omissions do not detract from the demonstration of a thorough understanding) Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 11 Code 10 Annotation: Response demonstrates misunderstanding of concepts; one letter correct (Z is blank but A, H and T are incorrect) and incomplete explanation. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 11 Code 20 Annotation: Response demonstrates partial understanding of concepts; two letters are correct (H and T are incorrect but correct line on A and Z is blank) with incomplete explanation (no reference to mira or fold, but mentions same on other side). Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 11 Code 30 Annotation: Response demonstrates minor omissions in the application of the procedures; all four letters correct (one or both lines on H, correct lines on A and T and Z is blank) but no explanation. Scoring Guide for Primary Mathematics Open-Response (2015) Section 1, Question 11 Code 40 Annotation: Response demonstrates an accurate application of the procedures; all four letters correct (all correct lines on A, H, T and Z blank) and complete explanation (includes both mirra and reflection).
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz