WHO-FIND Malaria RDT Evaluation Programme: Product Testing

WHO-FIND Malaria RDT Evaluation
Programme: Product Testing
Round 5
Malaria Policy Advisory Committee Meeting
WHO HQ Geneva, 11 September 2014
Jane Cunningham
Global Malaria Programme
Overview
• Background
• Overview of Product testing process
• Round 5 results – what’s new ?
• WHO procurement criteria
• Market trends and impact on manufacturers
• Future
– Product testing and lot testing based on recombinant Ag panels
–2
Field trials are expensive, not possible across many products,
specific in time and population
200+ malaria RDT in the market; 60+ manufacturers)
–3
International collaboration
• Between 2002-2008, WHO, TDR, FIND, US CDC and other
partners developed methods, characterized (microscopy, PCR,
ELISA), diluted and stored wild type P. falciparum and P.vivax
clinical samples from Africa, South America and South East
Asia
–4
WHO-FIND strategy for QA of RDT-based diagnosis
Supply chain management
Transport and storage
Manufacture
End users
Product development
Appropriate training and
instructions
Availability of common
reference standards
Management of positive
and negative results
Stage 1: Product testing
Monitoring of commodity
supply and disease rates
Evaluate product performance
Stage 2: Lot testing
Confirm product quality on arrival in
country before distribution to the field
Stage 3: QC at point of use (positive
control wells)
Ensure that RDTs have maintained
accuracy through transport and storage
Before
purchase
Before
distribution
–5
Before
use
Current Product Testing
Comparative evaluation of commercially-available antigen-detecting malaria
rapid diagnostic tests – RDTs.
$ R6
Evidence of quality
manufacturing
Open call
EOI
RDTs to specimen bank with
temperature monitor
Performance
versus panel
Stability
Ease-of-Use
assessment
Review of results by technical group
Results released to manufacturers
Final publication
5 years
Longer-term
stability test by
manufacturer
Product Testing (at US CDC)
• Performance – panel detection score, false-positive and invalid rates
– Phase 1 – 20 cultured P.falciparum samples; 2 lots; 1 RDT/lot
@2000p/µl ; 2 RDT/lot @ 200p/µl + 20 clean negative samples in R6
– Phase 2
• P.falciparum (100), P.vivax (35), 2 lots; 1 RDT/lot @2000p/µl ;
2 RDT/lot @ 200p/µl
• 1000 negative samples (mixed clean and other disease conditions)
• Heat stability (4°C, 35°C, 45°C; 75% humidity x 60 days)
• Ease of use assessment
– blood safety, instructions quality, no. timed steps, RDT anomalies
–7
Malaria Antigen Targets for RDTs
–8
–9
Antigen concentrations (HRP2,pLDH, aldolase) in panel
samples Rounds 1-5
–10
Performance measure: Panel detection score
–11
Rounds 1-5
• Published Rounds 1- 5
• 206 RDTs evaluated (147 unique products)
• Round 5 : 42 RDTs (23 resubmissions (10 compulsory)
31 combo, 9 Pf, 2 pan (34 manufacturers)
• Round 6
41 RDTs (30 combo, 11Pf (22 manufacturers))
–12
Results: PDS @ 200 and 2000p/µL
–13
Combined Pf and Pv PDS
–14
PT results are the basis for WHO procurement criteria
Eligible for tender: 58 RDTs (24 Pf, 31 combo, 2 pan; 1 Pv only)
Further considerations:
● Stability
● Ease of use and training requirements
● Price
● Lot testing
–15
Compulsory resubmission – 10/22
• PDSPf and
PDSPv were
significantly
lower in
compulsory
resubmissions
as compared to
voluntary
resubmissions
–16
RDT anomalies
–17
WHO Prequalification of malaria RDTs
WHO has started in 2007 the prequalification of
malaria RDTs according to the following procedure:
So far the following RDTs
has been prequalified:
•
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f
(05FK50/05FK53)
•
SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag
P.f/Pan (05FK63 and 05FK60)
WHO PQ Lab evaluation =
WHO Malaria RDT Product Testing
–18
Panel Detection Score (PDS) of Malaria RDT submitted for lot-testing
(for pre/post procurement)
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2007
2008
2009 Rd 1
Apr.
2010 Rd 2
May
2011 Rd 3
Dec
4.38%
2012 Rd 4
Dec
0.35%
Jan-Jun
2013
0.58%
71.19%
88.49%
93.42%
95.76%
89.04%
94.18%
99.04%
1.44%
0.00%
10.07%
6.58%
Not submitted to Product Testing
PDS* ≥75%
(high performance criteria)
PDS* ≥50%
(WHO medium performance criteria)
PDS* ˂50% including False Positive
(outside WHO criteria)
28.81%
–19
0.35%
4.24%
6.58%
5.11%
0.38%
RDT trends (2008-2013)
Data provided by 29 manufacturers eligible
for participation in the WHO RDT Product Testing Programme
Source: WHO/GMP manufacturer survey 2014
Based on Global Fund and PMI data (compiled by CHAI and UNITAID)
•
Three manufacturers won 90% of tenders in 2012
•
Four won 98% in 2013
•
90% of public sector supplies depends on 2 manufacturers
–20
Impact on manufacturers
• Following Round 5
– One prequalified product – Immunoquick Malaria falciparum
(0502_K 25,50,100 Dipstick) (Biosynex) is delisted (PF
PDS <75% and ++ red background
– One market leader combination test , First Response pLDHHRP2 Combo Test, I16FRC (Premier Medical
Corporation) scored P.vivax PDS 74.3% (Pf PDS 85%).
• Comparable to scores in Rounds 1 and 2 – PDS 75%.
– 2014 NOT eligible for WHO tender or procurement
– Procured by Ethiopia, Tanzania, DRC, Madagascar,
Rwanda, India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Cambodia, Indonesia
–21
Limitations of current system
• Need to reduce costs ++ to ensure sustainability and
reasonable manufacturer payments
• Need to standardize panels across time and space
• Need to make panels available to manufacturers (same as are
used for product testing and lot-testing)
• Need to provide countries with standard, reliable, acceptable
materials for lot-testing (there will be increased requirement
for in-country testing of RDTs in the future)
–22
Recombinant antigen based system
–23
–23
2013-2017 plan funded by UNITAID
Cost:
2003 -2011
2011-2014
$$$$
$$$$$
2015-2016
$$$
FUNDED
2017
$
Thank you !
• FIND
• US CDC
• Hospital for Tropical Disease, UK
• Queensland Institute of Medical
Research, Australia
• Army Malaria Institute, Australia
• Research Institute Tropical Medicine,
The Philippines
• Institute Pasteur Cambodia
• Collection sites: CIDEIM (Colombia),
DMR (Myanmar), KEMRI (Kenya),
EHNRI (Ethiopia), IHRDC (Tanzania),
IMT (Peru), IPB (Central Africa
Republic), IPM (Madagascar), UCAD
(Senegal), UL (Nigeria)
–25