SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA APT, The Phase I tool for HST Cycle 12 Brett Blacker Abstract In the our continuing effort to streamline our systems and improve service to the science community, the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) is developing and releasing, APT - The Astronomer's Proposal Tool as the new interface for Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Phase I and Phase II proposal submissions for HST Cycle 12. APT, was formerly called the Scientist's Expert Assitant (SEA), which started as a prototype effort to try and bring state of the art technology, more visual tools and power into the hands of proposers so that they can optimize the scientific return of their programs as well as HST. Proposing for HST and other missions, consists of requesting observing time and/or archival research funding. This step is called Phase I, where the scientific merit of a proposal is considered by a community based peer-review process. Accepted proposals then proceed thru Phase II, where the observations are specified in sufficient detail to enable scheduling on the telescope. In this paper we will present our concept and implementation plans for our Phase I development and submission tool, APT. More importantly, we will go behind the scenes and discuss why it's important for the Science Policies Division (SPD) and other groups at the STScI to have a new submission tool and submission output products. 11/19/02 Tech Talk Presentation Overview l History of HST Phase I l What is APT l Benefits l The tool l Future directions l Phase I Demo l Phase II 11/19/02 Tech Talk The Early days l Cycles 1 - 4: Paper and electronic submissions n n n n 11/19/02 Electronic submissions required redundant as well as unneeded data No Standardization of formats Errors required intensive manual effort Lack of acknowledgement process Tech Talk Recent Past l Cycles 5 - 11: LaTex and PostScript submissions n n n n n n n 11/19/02 Designed around freeware tools ÿ LaTeX templates ÿ Procmail to handle message forwarding ÿ Perl to handle message processing Implemented on UNIX platform Relied on all HST proposers having access to email Provided standard format for TAC to review Provided minimal syntax checking Provided acknowledgement process Provided parsing for database loading as well as statistics Tech Talk Cycles 5 - 11 Phase I Process Flow Proposer Site Incoming Mail to [email protected] Request Templates Submit LaTex Submit PostScript Processing Software P R O C M A I L E-mail templates to requestor Analyze, send mail to internal staff, send acknowledgement to submitter Store and Respond to submitter Store, forward to staff, respond to Submitter that there is a problem Other 11/19/02 Tech Talk However, or why another new Tool l Minimal syntax checking leads to lots of internal manual effort to load database and generate statistics n n n Garbage in, Garbage out! “It it ain’t broke don’t fix it” mentality has caused lots of manual effort/time by staff Early Phase I S/W support resources diverted to Phase II APT Project and other projects l Want to eliminate the use of procmail l Want to move from Unix to Desktop processing l APT was coming for Cycle 12 Phase II so why not include Phase I n n Most implementation techniques already developed for Phase II Single tool look and feel for Phase I and II 11/19/02 Tech Talk 11/19/02 Tech Talk What is APT? l Based on Scientist’s Expert Assistant (SEA) Prototype l Integrated work environment l Java based l High level goals n n n n 11/19/02 Make proposal preparation more intuitive Make observatory operations less cumbersome Provide documentation/help that is ÿ Friendly ÿ Up to date ÿ Easily accessible Define framework which is responsive to changes in technology and observatory operations Tech Talk User Benefits l Platform/tool Commonality (Phase I & II) l Automatic Syntax checking l Elimination of multiple specification/submission forms l Removal of Documentation layers l Easier Preplanning by User l Ease of Use l Can use any text editor for generating Science Justification n 11/19/02 Can easily modify Cycle 11 LaTex file for new Template Tech Talk STScI Benefits l Uniform data specifications l Current System does minimal syntax or semantics checking l Seamless database ingestion l Increased Phase I Search capabilities l Eliminates multiple submission processes (DD Web, GO LaTeX, and GTO) l Bottom line: Cleaner data input n n Reduces Manual effort by SPD technical staff and others Saves time in the process 11/19/02 Tech Talk APT Toolset l Visual Target Tuner (VTT) n n l Exposure Time Calculators n l Context sensitive help tied to Call for Proposals Pull down menus of only legal values and combinations Attach “Science Justification” from any word processor as PDF attachment Phase II Specifications, Orbit and Visit Planners n n 11/19/02 Same functionality as existing web-based versions Phase I Submission n n n l Built from SEA prototype Visualize & manipulate observatory field of view Enable “easier” orbit packing via click and drag Link to TRANS and SPIKE scheduling system Tech Talk User Site Observer APT Tool Suite User Develops & Inputs Proposal, APT supplies unique Proposal Id Visual Target Tuner Exp Time Calculator Phase 1 Editting Tools Obs Constraint Mgr Submission Tool Starview2/Duplication Resource Estimator User accesses Phase 1 web page for Phase 1 info, Downloads APT tool suite, APT looks up Address Information, APT submits XML proposal file STScI Site Phase 1 Web Page Address Information Phase 1 Submission Sys FTP Server ID Server Phase I Features l Investigator Name/Address lookup from our Address database at STScI (when online) l Context-sensitive help to Call for Proposals Documentation l Only legal values can be entered l Automatic Phase I to II conversion l Stores output as XML l APT Replaces procmail and FTP submission systems l Automatic check to see if you have latest version (when online) 11/19/02 Tech Talk Features l Tool is used only for Coverpage Information n n n n n n n l Science Justification and Supporting questions are a single PDF attachment. n l 11/19/02 Investigator information (PI and CoIs) Instrument usage Science Category (ie Cosmology, Galaxies, Solar System…) Resources required (orbits, targets or dollars) Special flags Abstract Observation Summary Will provide an example template in Word, LaTeX, Text and others. In-house tools remain the same for Cycle 12 Tech Talk TAC Output 11/19/02 Tech Talk Cleaner Phase I Database 11/19/02 Tech Talk Platforms l The APT tools are highly graphical and interactive applications and therefore run best on a robust machine. The APT is supported on the following systems: n PC: Windows (98 or higher) ÿ n Sun: Solaris 6, 7 and 8 ÿ n Minimum requirements: Ultra 1 (but we recommend a faster machine), 128 Mb RAM: Tested on the CDE Window manager, TWM known to be a problem PC: Linux (Redhat 7.2 or higher) ÿ n Minimum requirements: 266 Mhz Pentium II or equivalent, 64 Mb RAM Minimum requirements: 266 Mhz Pentium II or equivalent, 64 Mb RAM: The APT package may run fine on other versions of linux, but we only tested on Redhat 7.2. Mac: OS X 10.1 or higher ÿ 11/19/02 The VTT does not work under OS X 10.2 Tech Talk Implementation Plans l Director’s Discretionary Release n n n n l July 2002 Allows community to help us with beta testing Also provides advanced training prior to Phase I Deadline Most Phase I capabilities in place with some liens ÿ PDF previewing ÿ Copy/Cut/Paste Cycle 12 Phase I Operational Release n n Mid October 2002 w/ Phase I Deadline now on January 24, 2003 Mid November 2002 release to include Context Sensitive Help 11/19/02 Tech Talk Training/Assistance l Demos at as many meetings/conferences as we can attend and support n n n n n l STScI booth one on ones at past June and upcoming January AAS Setting up a special demo session at January AAS Calibration Workshop Treasury Workshop Others available upon request Help Desk (Multiple layers of help)- Remedy system n n n n SPD staff Test Team members Developers Computer Support Staff (for installation/configuration problems) 11/19/02 Tech Talk Future for APT Phase I l Fully integrated toolset l Convert existing in-house phase I tools to use XML output l Increased searching capabilities using PDF “science justification” attachment l Distribute fully electronic output products to reviewers l Create reviewer tool from XML output to database l Obtain APT at http://apt.stsci.edu l Obtain Help from [email protected] 11/19/02 Tech Talk
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz