STIMULATED PHOTON- AND ELECTRON EMISSION FROM LATTICE DEFECTS IN BARIUMAND STRONTIUM SULPHATE G. Holzapfel, M. Krystek To cite this version: G. Holzapfel, M. Krystek. STIMULATED PHOTON- AND ELECTRON EMISSION FROM LATTICE DEFECTS IN BARIUM- AND STRONTIUM SULPHATE. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1976, 37 (C7), pp.C7-238-C7-240. <10.1051/jphyscol:1976758>. <jpa-00216917> HAL Id: jpa-00216917 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00216917 Submitted on 1 Jan 1976 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés. C7-238 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C7, suppKment aau no 12, Tome 37, Ddcembre 1976 STIMULATED PHOTON- AND ELECTRON EMISSION FROM LATTICE DEFECTS IN BARIUM- AND STRONTIUM SULPHATE G. HOLZAPFEL and M. KRYSTEK Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Institut Berlin, 1 Berlin 10, Abbestr. 2-12, FRG Rksumk. - L'Btude des pieges d'electrons dans les sulfates alcalino-terreux actives par des terres rares a kt6 axke principalement sur le BaS04 et le SrS04. Ces derniers, cristallisent dans le m6me rkseau de barite et sont dopQ en E u ~ +L'kmission . simultanee de photons et d'electrons (luminescence et exokmission thermostimul6es) ont pour origine des pieges d'klectrons equivalents, mais il n'y a pas d'interfkrence entre ces phknomenes. La dependance des niveaux d'energie des pieges par rapport aux parametres de reseau est aussi discutke ;elle signale des defauts intrinseques. Abstract. - Investigation of electron trapping sites in rare earth activated alkaline earth sulphates is focussed on Euz+ doped Bas04 and SrS04, both crystallizing in the barite lattice. Simultaneous photon- and electron emission (thermally stimulated luminescence and exoemission) originate in equivalent electron traps, but the phenomena do not interfere. The dependence of the trap energy levels on the lattice parameters, which points to intrinsic defects, is discussed. Sulphate phosphors became interesting on account of their high response to ionizing radiation 11, 21. Optimum efficiencies are achieved with earth alkali sulphates, especially CaSO,, BaSO, and SrSO,. Activators for thermoluminescence (TL) are conveniently provided by rare earth (RE) admixtures. The TL emission characteristics are largely determined by the valency of the incorporated RE ions. RE3+ ions produce individual line-structured spectra which can be identified with transitions between known RE3+ levels shielded against the host crystal lattice field. In contrast the RE2+ ion, which is represented only by Eu2+, exhibits a non-structured, broad TL emission band, suggesting strong coupling with the lattice. The RE3+ line emission spectra are entirely independent of the host lattice, whereas the Eu2+ emission band shifts on the wavelength scale when the lattice structure is varied. Another feature, which is controlled by the trapping sites, is the glow peak location on the temperature scale. Here the TL glow peaks are independent of the RE3+ species but dependent on the individual sulphate lattice. This glow peak shift is even more pronounced for Eu2+ doping. These facts suggest trapping sites which are related to the interatomic distances of the sulphate lattices. Excluding CaSO,, BaSO, and SrSO, crystallize in the same lattice and would appear to be suitable for investigation of the nature of trapping sites in more detail. Consideration of the TL emission spectra indicates that only Eu2+ doping can produce classical recombination phosphors with the trapping sites clearly separated from the activator sites. General information on electron traps in ionic lattices is often available from measurements of exoelectron emission 131. This may take place simultaneously with luminescence from recombination phosphors. Common to both is the detrapping of electrons by thermal or optical stimulation (I). The mobile electrons may then recombine with holes trapped in activators, so causing photon emission (TL). Alternatively, the detrapped electrons may escape from the surface (TSEE). Outside the crystal the exoelectrons can be sensitively detected by particle counters. As a result of their small energy the electrons are emitted only from a very thin surface layer, whereas photon emission occurs in the bulk of the emitter. If penetration of the surface is not seriously affected by the charge of the escaping particle, TL and TSEE will yield comparable results [4]. Since activators are not required for exoemission, the initial trap spectrum of phosphors can be investigated before and parallel with TL activation. The results for BaSO, and SrSO, increasingly doped with Eu2+ are shown in figure 1. The undoped materials already show strong TSEE which remains unaffected by the Eu2+ doping up to concentrations of loz0cmd3. This evidently means that electron traps are not introduced into the sulphate lattice b y the activator ; rather they appear to be formed by natural defects (or impurities) in the original material. This result is supported by closer inspection of the corresponding luminescence and exoemission glow curves (1) Code : TSEE Thermally Stimulated Exoelectron Emission OSEE Optically Stimulated Exoelectron Emission. Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1976758 STIMULATED PHOTON- AND ELECTRON EMISSION FROM Bas04 AND SrS04 C7-239 '//- 1 a) B ~ S O L U Sr c -u P a, W 0 -u 61 5- a1 TL lY ' stottonory ernlss~on , - - o= b) SrS04 I to O - , 01 EuO ,, n # , - II I I I I I I - 03 mol% 0.5 concentratton - b) TSEE FIG. 1. - Relative TL- and TSEE efficiencies of Bas04 and SrS04 dependent on the dopant concentration. ;; -;z. 0 -2 &QL n ' (Fig. 2) which exhibit characteristic single peaks. The TL-and TSEE glow curves are almost identical without any change in TSEE between zero and high Eu2+ doping. The specific peak shift from BaSO, to SrSO, occurs for TSEE as well as for TL. Analysis of the glow curves by a high resolving, computer-assisted method [4, 51 revealed fi~storder kinetics governing both the TL- and the TSEE process. This indicates that the effects do not interfere as already shown by the independence of the TSEE efficiency with regard to the growing TL activation (Fig. 1). The term data (activation energy, frequency factor) could therefore be uniquely evaluated and definitely attributed to single trapping levels, after separation of minor satellite levels [4] (Table I). The frequency factors are of the order of the DEBYE frequency. Identical activation energies prove that the same type of trapping site is effective for TL and TSEE and that these traps are not distorted by the vicinity of the surface. The energy shift of the trapping levels when the sulphate is altered may be correlated to lattice parameters [2]. A decrease in the average nearest neighbour 0,2 statlonary ernlss~on j o I - 500 400 Temperature K FIG. 2. - TI- and TSEE glow curves of Bas04 and SrS04 ; heating rate 0.14 Kis. Dashed curves computed using the term data of table I. distance (BaSO, 0.286 nm, SrSO, 0.275 nm) results in a shift of the activation energy to higher values (BaSO, 1.08 eV ; SrSO, 1.27 eV). Hence it should be discussed whether a relation similar to the well known MOLLWO rule can be found. An immediate application to our results does not appear feasible since the MOLLWO-rule relies on optical absorption measurements. The thermal activation energies obtained from TL- and TSEE- measurements differ from the optical activation energies by the FRANCK-CONDON ratio [6]. Due to varying polarisation properties this ratio may change even in Term data of prin~i~val electron trap levels in BaSO, and SrSO, Material BaSO, (*) Normalized to q SrSOa TSEE term data = 1 Kjs. 600 C7-240 G. HOLZAPFEL and M. KRYSTEK the same lattice structure, i. e. from BaSO, to SrSO,. Leaving SrSO, for later investigation, only the optical activation energy of BaSO, is known from optical measurements (absorptance and respectively reflectance) combined with photothermal exoelectron emission (selective OSEE) [7]. Another aspect refers to the lower symmetry of the barite lattice, since the MOLLWO-rule. EOP'= A . d - @ (1) (Eop, optical activation energy, d lattice constant) was originally formulated for NaC1-type lattices [8]. The constants A, a, however, change with the lattice type. In principle, if the lattice structure is non-cubic, one cannot expect the simple relation (1) to be valid a priori. Hence the intrinsic nature of the defects producing the electron traps in the highly sensitive sulphate phosphors must be substantiated by continued study. References [1] YAMASHITA, T., NADA,N., ONISHI,H., KITAMURA, S., Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Luminescence Dosimetry, Gatlinburg, C0nf-680920 and Physics 21 (1971) 295. [2] DIXON,R. L., EKSTRAND, K. E., J. Lumin. 8 (1974) 383. [31 BOHUN,A+, SCHARMANN, A., K ; ~ x H., ~ ~proc., ~ ~4 , th Int. Symp. Exoelectron emission and dosimetry, Liblice 1973, Czechosl. Acad. Sc. Ed. A. Bohun Prague (1974). [4] HOLZAPFEL, G., KRYSTEK, M., Phys. Status Solidi (a) 37 (1976) 303. [5] HOLZAPFEL, G., KRYSTEK, M., WOLBER, L., Vide 30 (1975) I n7 A",. 161 NINK,R.2 HOLZAPFEL, G . Physique Collo4.34 (1973) C 9. [71 NINKy R. Optik 41 515. [8] MARKHAM, J. J., F-Centers in Alkali Halides (Academic Press, New York and London) 1966. 5.9
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz