Pitfalls in the Use of the Pavlik Harness for Treatment of Congenital Dysplasia, Subluxation, and Dislocation of the Hip Scott Mubarak, M.D. Steven Garfin, M.D. Raymond Vance, M.D. Bert McKinnon, M.D. David Sutherland, M.D. (Reprinted from J o u r n a l of Bone and Joint Survery Vol. 63-A, No. 8, pp. 1239-1248, October 1981.) Copyrighted 1981 by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. Abstract: W e reviewed the records of treatment of eighteen infants with con genital dysplasia, subluxation, o r disloca tion of the hip w h o h a d problems with the involved hip following treatment with the Pavlik harness. The most c o m m o n prob l e m ( s e e n in t w e l v e p a t i e n t s w i t h a dislo c a t e d h i p ) w a s failure t o o b t a i n r e d u c t i o n . This failure w a s attributed primarily to improper use of the harness by the physi c i a n . I n s o m e p a t i e n t s , t h r e e to five m o n t h s elapsed before the physician recognized the lack of reduction. In nine patients, a Pavlik harness of poor quality and con struction added to both the physician's and t h e p a t i e n t ' s p r o b l e m s , a n d in six p a t i e n t s , p o o r p a t i e n t c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e u s e o f the h a r n e s s w a s p a r t i a l l y r e s p o n s i b l e for t h e f a i l u r e . I n t h r e e p a t i e n t s w h o w e r e ini tially t r e a t e d in t h e P a v l i k h a r n e s s , a v a s cular necrosis of the hip subsequently de v e l o p e d , in t w o f o l l o w i n g o p e n r e d u c t i o n a n d in o n e after c l o s e d r e d u c t i o n a n d c a s t application. T h e p h y s i c i a n ' s i n d i c a t i o n s for u s e a n d application of the harness must be appro p r i a t e . T h e c h i l d m u s t b e e x a m i n e d fre q u e n t l y o u t o f t h e h a r n e s s b o t h clinically a n d r o e n t g e n o g r a p h i c a l l y . F a i l u r e to achieve reduction or adductor relaxation m u s t b e r e c o g n i z e d p r o m p t l y a n d dealt with immediately. In t h e t w e n t y - f o u r y e a r s s i n c e Pavlik first r e p o r t e d its u s e in 1,912 p a t i e n t s , t h e P a v lik h a r n e s s h a s b e e n u s e d w i d e l y a s an o r t h o t i c d e v i c e for t h e m a n a g e m e n t o f c o n genital dislocation of t h e h i p . W h e n appropriately applied, the har ness prevents adduction a n d extension of t h e hip w h i l e a l l o w i n g f u r t h e r flexion, a b d u c t i o n , a n d r o t a t i o n . This p o s i t i o n a n d m o t i o n a r e d e s i g n e d to aid t h e gentle, s p o n t a n e o u s r e d u c t i o n o f t h e dislocated h i p a n d a c e t a b u l a r d e v e l o p m e n t of t h e d y s p l a s t i c h i p , . T h e p u r p o s e o f this s t u d y w a s to r e v i e w t h e u s e of t h e Pavlik h a r n e s s b y p h y s i c i a n s in o u r c o m m u n i t y 2 4,6 a n d to i d e n t i f y t h e c o m p l i c a t i o n s a n d p i t falls e n c o u n t e r e d i n i t s u s e . clinics, and hospitals w h o either supplied or c o n s t r u c t e d t h e i r o w n P a v l i k h a r n e s s e s for d i s t r i b u t i o n to p a t i e n t s . MATERIAL AND METHODS T h e records and roentgenograms of 110 patients were reviewed. Eighteen patients with congenital dysplasia, subluxation, or dislocation of the hip in w h o m problems d e v e l o p e d r e l a t e d to t h e P a v l i k h a r n e s s a n d its proper use were identified. T h e s e pa tients were divided into two groups based o n t h e i r a g e s at t h e t i m e o f d i a g n o s i s . In Group I the diagnosis was made in the newborn period. T h e problem hip was classified as dislocatable or dislocated b a s e d on the treating orthopaedist's clini cal e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e p a t i e n t . I n G r o u p II T h i s r e v i e w is a r e p o r t o f t h e e x p e r i e n c e of t h e o r t h o p a e d i c s u r g e o n s at t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a at S a n D i e g o affiliated hospitals in the use o f the Pavlik harness in treating congenital dislocation o f the hip. T h e n a m e s o f t h e p a t i e n t s to w h o m P a v lik h a r n e s s e s h a d b e e n prescribed during t h e p e r i o d o f 1975 t h r o u g h 1979 w e r e o b tained from t h e orthotic agencies in t h e San D i e g o area. Additionally n a m e s also were o b t a i n e d from o r t h o p a e d i c surgeons, TABLE I Group-I Patients t h e d i a g n o s i s w a s m a d e after t h e a g e o f o n e m o n t h ( r a n g e , o n e to t e n m o n t h s ) . T h e s e p r o b l e m h i p s w e r e c l a s s i f i e d as h a v i n g acetabular dysplasia, subluxation, or dis location, depending on the appearance o f the patient's initial roentgenograms. T h e major p r o b l e m s that h a v e b e e n re ported to occur w i t h the use of this device for t h e t r e a t m e n t o f c o n g e n i t a l d i s l o c a t i o n o f t h e h i p a r e failure to a c h i e v e a c o n c e n t r i c reduction a n d avascular n e c r o s i s , . O t h e r problems that w e encountered were de l a y e d a c e t a b u l a r d e v e l o p m e n t , f a i l u r e to stretch the h i p adductors, femoral-nerve palsy, and inferior dislocation. T h e reasons for t h e s e p r o b l e m s w e r e d e t e r m i n e d a n d classified as b e i n g d u e to: 1. T h e p h y s i c i a n — T h e p h y s i c i a n ' s i n d i c a t i o n s for t h e u s e o r a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e h a r n e s s w e r e i n a p p r o p r i a t e . In s o m e c a s e s the Pavlik harness used w a s of poorquality design and allowed inadequate control of hip position. 2 . T h e p a r e n t s — T h e p a r e n t s f a i l e d to h a v e t h e c h i l d w e a r t h e h a r n e s s o r u s e it properly. 3. I d i o p a t h i c — N o p h y s i c i a n o r p a r e n t a l fault w a s e v i d e n t , a n d o t h e r r e a s o n s c o u l d not b e identified. 3 5,79 RESULTS E i g h t e e n p a t i e n t s w e r e i d e n t i f i e d as h a v i n g failures o f treatment following use of the Pavlik harness. Group I In G r o u p I t h e r e w e r e n i n e p a t i e n t s w h o w e r e diagnosed as having dislocatable or d i s l o c a t e d h i p s at b i r t h ( T a b l e I ) . I n n o i n stance did the treating orthopaedist's ini tial r e c o r d e d e x a m i n a t i o n i n d i c a t e w h e t h e r a dislocated h i p was reducible or not. T w o of the n i n e patients had bilateral dislocated hips, a n d o n e had bilateral dislocatable hips. Following application of the harness, r o e n t g e n o g r a m s w e r e m a d e for e i g h t o f t h e n i n e patients. Failure to achieve concentric reduction with the harness was the major p r o b l e m i n all n i n e p a t i e n t s . O n e p a t i e n t ( C a s e 1) a l s o h a d a t r a n s i e n t f e m o r a l - n e r v e palsy. In s i x o f t h e s e p a t i e n t s , t h e a m o u n t o f h i p flexion o b t a i n e d in the harness as deter mined on the roentgenogram never was sufficient t o direct t h e f e m o r a l h e a d to ward the triradiate cartilage. In five pa tients a Pavlik harness of poor-quality con structed was used, which allowed adduc tion and internal rotation o f the hip. F u t h e r m o r e , i n all n i n e p a t i e n t s t h r e e to five m o n t h s p a s s e d b e f o r e t h e p h y s i c i a n recognized that the h i p w a s not reduced. All o f t h e s e n i n e p a t i e n t s s u b s e q u e n t l y r e quired traction, general anesthesia, reduc tion, a n d a spica cast. S i x of the n i n e pa t i e n t s e v e n t u a l l y r e q u i r e d an o p e n r e d u c t i o n . In t h r e e p a t i e n t s a v a s c u l a r n e c r o s i s subsequently developed, following open r e d u c t i o n i n t w o a n d after c l o s e d r e d u c tion in o n e . Group II I n G r o u p I I , failure t o o b t a i n r e d u c t i o n w a s t h e p r o b l e m i n four o f n i n e p a t i e n t s for r e a s o n s similar to t h o s e in G r o u p I ( T a b l e I I ) . I n C a s e 17, a t e n - m o n t h - o l d boy, attempted reduction of bilateral dis l o c a t i o n failed. T h i s p a t i e n t d i d n o t o b t a i n adequate hip flexion in the harness and w a s at t h e u p p e r l i m i t o f t h e a g e r e c o m m e n d e d for u s e o f t h e h a r n e s s . F u r t h e r m o r e , t h e s i x - w e e k trial o f s p o n t a n e o u s r e duction in the harness w a s too long. In Case 16, the proper degree of hip flexion first a c h i e v e d r e d u c t i o n , b u t e x c e s s i v e flexion t h e n p r o d u c e d a n i n f e r i o r ( o b t u r a t o r ) d i s l o c a t i o n . In t h r e e o t h e r p a t i e n t s the hip adductors remained contracted. O n e o f t h e s e patients (Case 14) w a s in a poor-quality harness which allowed hip adduction. T h e other two were in a well m a d e harness that was properly posi t i o n e d , a n d n o s p e c i f i c r e a s o n for t h e t i g h t hip adductors was found. There were no patients with avascular necrosis in Group II. 4 Other Five other patients with instability or dislocation of the hip w h o had problems with the Pavlik harness were encountered. TABLE I I Group-II Patients T h e y were not included in this review b e cause of their diagnoses: myelodysplasia (two), Ehler-Danlos Syndrome (one), teratogenesis (one), and sepsis (one). DISCUSSION T h e construction, application, and use of the Pavlik h a r n e s s is g u i d e d b y a few sim ple p r i n c i p l e s a n d p r a c t i c a l t e c h n i q u e s ( F i g s . 1-A t h r o u g h 1 - D ) . W i t h c o m m e r c i a l production o f the Pavlik harness, some o f the principles of construction have b e e n violated, w h i c h in s o m e cases has resulted in an i n a d e q u a t e h a r n e s s . A few important points in harness construction must b e noted. First, the shoulder straps on the h a l t e r ( c h e s t - s t r a p ) s h o u l d cross i n t h e b a c k to p r e v e n t t h e m from s l i d i n g o v e r a n d d o w n the child's shoulders. S e c o n d , the b u c k l e s for t h e a n t e r i o r (flexor) s t i r r u p s t r a p s s h o u l d b e l o c a t e d at t h e c h i l d ' s a n t e r i o r a x i l l a r y l i n e . I f t h e y are p l a c e d too far medially, tightening the anterior stirrups t r a p w i l l c a u s e n o t o n l y f l e x i o n b u t also a d d u c t i o n o f t h e h i p . T h i r d , t h e b u c k l e s for the posterior (abduction) stirrup-straps should b e located over the scapula. Fourth, t h e V e l c r o s t r a p for t h e p r o x i m a l p a r t o f t h e Fig. 1-A: Step A. The chest halter is positioned at the nipple line and fastened with the Velcro® closure. The crossed shoulder straps then stablilize the halter at this position. Fig. 1-B: Step B. The leg and foot are set back into the stirrups and fastened with the Velcro® straps. Care must be taken to ensure that the flexor and abduc tion straps are oriented anteriorly and posteriorly with respect to the child's knee. Fig. 1-C: Step C. The anterior (flexor) stirrup-straps are connected to the halter. The straps are adjusted so that hip flexion is between 100 and 110 degrees to achieve optimum position of the femoral head rela tive to the acetabulum. Occasionally, more flexion will be necessary initially to achieve reduction. It is important that the insertion of the anterior stirrupstraps on the halter be at the child's anterior axillary line. Fig. l-D: Step D. Lastly, posterior (abduction) stirrup-straps are attached to the halter. The insertion point of these straps on the halter should be located over the child's scapula. The posterior stirrup-straps should be adjusted so that there is approximately five to eight centimeters between the knees when both hips are abducted and the hips have free abduction. Figs. 1-A through l-D: Application of the Pavlik Harness Fig. 2-A. If the Velcro® straps are too far distal, the anterior and posterior stirrup-straps will bowstring behind the knee axis. Further tightening of these straps will cause increased knee flexion and rela tively poor control of hip position. Abduction and internal rotation of the hip is possible. Fig. 2-B. With a properly positioned proximal Vel cro® strap just distal to the popliteal fossa, there is better control of hip flexion and abduction and less flextion of the knee. leg should b e located just b e l o w the child's popliteal fossa (Figs. 2 - A and 2 - B ) . T h i s strap stabilizes and controls the k n e e and prevents bowstringing o f the anterior and posterior stirrup-straps. With bowstring ing o f the stirrup-straps, internal rotation a n d a d d u c t i o n o f t h e h i p c a n o c c u r as t h e p o s t e r i o r s t i r r u p - s t r a p is t i g h t e n e d (Fig. 3 ) . T h e P a v l i k h a r n e s s is i n d i c a t e d i n the treatment of hip dysplasia or subluxation i n c h i l d r e n from b i r t h t o a b o u t t h e a g e o f ten m o n t h s . A s t h e c h i l d a p p r o a c h e s t h e a g e o f o n e y e a r , i t u s u a l l y b e c o m e s too dif ficult to h o l d t h e p a t i e n t in t h e h a r n e s s , a n d a more conventional fixed-position brace will b e necessary. T h e h a r n e s s m a y b e u s e d to reduce a c o n genital dislocation o f the h i p in a child w h o is less than eight m o n t h s old if the criteria o f R a m s e y et al. a r e m e t . T h e y n o t e d t h a t adequate h i p flexion m u s t b e o b t a i n a b l e so that the femoral head is directed toward t h e triradiate c a r t i l a g e , a n d m a d e a r o e n t g e n o g r a m o f t h e h i p s i n flexion p r i o r t o application of the harness. T h e harness is not indicated in patients in w h o m the d i s l o c a t e d h i p is n o t c e n t e r e d t o w a r d t h e acetabulum in flexion or in infants w h o are m o r e t h a n e i g h t m o n t h s o l d w i t h a congenital dislocation of the hip. We have f o u n d it m o r e p r a c t i c a l t o a p p l y t h e h a r ness on the child and then make the r o e n t g e n o g r a m . In d i s o r d e r s s u c h a s m y e l o d y s p l a s i a ( s e c o n d t o fourth lumbar functional level), teratogenic dislocation, and arthrogryposis, either muscle imbal ance or stiffness, or b o t h , m a k e s applica tion of the harness nearly impossible. F u r t h e r m o r e , i t a l s o u s u a l l y is i n a p p r o p r i a t e for u s e i n i n f a n t s w i t h c o n n e c t i v e tissue disorders or as a m e a n s of posi t i o n i n g a s e p t i c h i p after d r a i n a g e . T h e generalized capsular laxity found in these conditions m a y cause inferior dislocation of the hip. Fig. 3. This infant is wearing a commercially avail able Pavlik harness. Note that the insertion points of the anterior (flexor) stirrup-straps are placed me dially. Further tightening of these straps will cause not only flexion, but also abduction, of the hips. Also note that the Velcro® leg straps are located too far distally. There is bowstringing of both the anterior and the posterior stirrup-straps behind the knee. There is poor knee and hip control for this reason. To achieve spontaneous reduction o f a congenital dislocation of the hip in an in fant w h o i s l e s s t h a n e i g h t m o n t h s o l d , t h e harness is applied and a roentgenogram w i t h t h e c h i l d i n t h e h a r n e s s is m a d e to confirm a d e q u a t e flexion (Fig. 4 ) . T h e h a r n e s s is w o r n c o n s t a n t l y u n t i l h i p s t a b i l i t y is a c h i e v e d . T h e p a t i e n t is e x a m i n e d c l i n i c a l l y , o u t o f t h e h a r n e s s , at w e e k l y i n t e r v a l s . B y t w o o r t h r e e w e e k s after h a r n e s s application, both clinical and roentgeno- Fig. 4. Plan of use of the Pavlik harness in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in an infant less than eight months old. Fig. 5-A. This child was diagnosed at birth as having bilateral dislocated hips. This roentgenogram, made at the age of three months in the Pavlik harness, demonstrates as symetry of the distance from the femoral metaphysis to the triradiate cartilage. The left hip is abnormal and the Pavlik harness is maintaining the hip dislocated, posterior to the acetabulum. Note that the acetabular margins look quite good because of the outlet-type view of the pelvis when roentgenograms are made with the child in the Pavlik harness. The obturator foramen is visualized poorly and the sciatic notch is well demarcated. Fig. 5-B. Because of the clinical examination and the ambiguous roentgenogram shown in Fig. 5-A, a second roentgenogram was made with the child out of the harness with the femora in 45 degrees of abduction. This clearly demonstrates the dislocation of the left hip and more accurately demonstrates a true view of the pelvis, showing the acetabular dysplasia which is greater on the left than on the right. This child subsequently underwent a period of skin traction and required an open reduction of the left hip at the age of three months. Subse quently, avascular necrosis developed in the left capital femoral epiphysis. graphic examination must confirm reduc t i o n o f t h e h i p . If t h e h i p is n o t r e d u c e d d u r i n g t h e t h r e e - w e e k trial o f h a r n e s s u s e , t h e m o r e c o n v e n t i o n a l a p p r o a c h o f trac tion, general anesthesia, closed reduction, arthrography, and a spica cast should b e instituted Fig. 4 ) . As roentgenograms m a d e w i t h t h e c h i l d i n t h e h a r n e s s are dif ficult t o i n t e r p r e t , w e p r e f e r t o m a k e a 4 5 - d e g r e e a b d u c t i o n (frog-leg lateral) ro entgenogram of the h i p s out of the har n e s s to c o n f i r m t h e i r p o s i t i o n at t h e three-week visit. Furthermore, evaluation o f a c e t a b u l a r d e v e l o p m e n t is e a s i e r w h e n r o e n t g e n o g r a m s are m a d e w i t h t h e c h i l d out of the harness. A roentgenogram in the h a r n e s s p r o d u c e s a n outlet v i e w o f t h e p e l vis because of the loss of lumbar lordosis a n d pelvic tilt (Figs. 5 - A a n d 5 - B ) . I f t h e t r e a t i n g p h y s i c i a n i s still i n d o u b t as to t h e hip's position, arthrography under general a n e s t h e s i a s h o u l d b e p e r f o r m e d to c o n f i r m a c o n c e n t r i c reduction (Fig. 4 ) . If the fem oral h e a d is i n t h e a c e t a b u l u m , t h e pa t i e n t i s f o l l o w e d at t w o t o f o u r - w e e k i n t e r vals u n t i l t h e c l i n i c a l a n d r o e n t g e n o g r a p h i c e x a m i n a t i o n s are n o r m a l . A g a i n , t h e s e should b e performed with the patient out of the harness. Generally, w e have w e a n e d a c h i l d f r o m t h e h a r n e s s a c c o r d i n g to t h e p l a n o f R a m s e y et at. T h e two major problems previously re ported with the use of the Pavlik harness a r e failure to o b t a i n r e d u c t i o n o f t h e d i s l o cated hip and vascular necrosis o f the cap ital f e m o r a l e p i p h y s i s . F a i l u r e to o b t a i n spontaneous reduction of the congenitally dislocated hip with the harness has occur r e d i n 19 p e r c e n t o f p r e v i o u s l y r e p o r t e d cases - . Pavlik reported a failure in reduc t i o n of 16 p e r c e n t , w h i l e o t h e r s h a v e r e ported a range of 2 to 92 per cent - . In the treatment of subluxation and acetabular dysplasia, however, g o o d results have been reported in 98 per cent of the pub lished series - . T h e m o s t c o m m o n p r o b l e m w a s t h e fail u r e to m a i n t a i n r e d u c t i o n o r to a c h i e v e spontaneous reduction of a dislocated hip. T h e treating orthopaedist did not observe t h e p r o p e r i n d i c a t i o n s for t h e u s e o f t h e Pavlik h a r n e s s , and either applied the har 1 7 1 2,4 6 7 ness improperly or used a harness of poor quality construction, or both. T h e most c o m m o n e r r o r w a s a failure t o o b t a i n e n o u g h h i p flexion in the h a r n e s s to achieve reduction (Tables I and II). Moreover, in most cases the orthopaedist failed to r e c o g n i z e t h e l a c k o f r e d u c t i o n for a n a v e r a g e o f t h r e e a n d a h a l f m o n t h s after application of the harness. This delay, m o r e t h a n a n y o t h e r factor, p r o b a b l y a c c o u n t e d for t h e n e c e s s i t y o f o p e n r e d u c t i o n in six of the patients in this series and may b e a contributing factor in t h e cases o f av ascular n e c r o s i s (Figs. 5 - A a n d 5 - B ) . A s noted in the literature, the incidence of avascular necrosis w a s higher w h e n the h a r n e s s w a s u s e d t o treat c o n g e n i t a l d i s l o cation of the hip rather than subluxation or acetabular dysplasia . Pavlik, in treating 6 3 2 d i s l o c a t e d h i p s , r e p o r t e d an i n c i d e n c e of avascular necrosis of 2.8 per cent, al t h o u g h it o n l y o c c u r e d i n h i p s r e q u i r i n g m a n u a l r e d u c t i o n after failure o f s p o n t a n e ous reduction in the harness. Tonnis re p o r t e d a 15 p e r c e n t r a t e o f a v a s c u l a r n e crosis in a multicenter study o f 4 , 0 4 6 h i p s . Others have reported rates of 4 p e r cent , 5 per cent , and 9 per cent . More recently, K a l a m c h i et al. h a v e r e p o r t e d n o i n c i d e n c e of avascular necrosis with use of the har n e s s in the treatment o f seventy-seven dislocated hips, 141 subluxated hips, and 105 h i p s w i t h acetabular dysplasia. In this series there w e r e three patients w i t h avascular necrosis (Table I ) . In t h e s e p a t i e n t s t h e failure o f s p o n t a n e o u s r e d u c tion in the harness necessitated traction, c l o s e d r e d u c t i o n ( o n e p a t i e n t ) o r o p e n re duction (two patients), and spica-cast ap p l i c a t i o n . A l t h o u g h it i s difficult t o i n c r i m i n a t e a n y specific procedure, it s e e m s likely that t h e avascular necrosis resulted from surgical intervention or the cast rather t h a n t h e h a r n e s s . H o w e v e r , as n o t e d i n t h e European literature , overly vigorous tightening o f the a b d u c t i o n strap m a y re sult i n a v a s c u l a r n e c r o s i s . Although sufficient h i p flexion in the harness to direct the femoral h e a d toward t h e t r i r a d i a t e c a r t i l a g e i s n e c e s s a r y to achieve spontaneous reduction, excessive flexion m a y produce p r o b l e m s . In C a s e 16, 5 , 8 , 9 9 3 7 1 0 8,9 first t h e p r o p e r h i p f l e x i o n a c h i e v e d r e duction a n d then excessive flexion pro duced an inferior (obturator) dislocation. Another problem noted with overly vigor ous h i p flexion w a s a transient femoralnerve palsy (Case 1). T h i s complication has b e e n reported b y o t h e r s . H i p flexion o f more than 120 degrees should b e main t a i n e d o n l y for t h e t w o t o t h r e e - w e e k trial o f s p o n t a n e o u s r e d u c t i o n . I f r e d u c t i o n is o b t a i n e d , t h e f l e x i o n is r e d u c e d to 9 0 t o 100 d e g r e e s . In t w o o t h e r p a t i e n t s t h e h i p a d d u c t o r s r e m a i n e d contracted in spite of a well made h a r n e s s a n d its p r o p e r u s e ( C a s e 1 2 a n d 1 5 ) . Adductor tenotomy was necessary before acetabular development could proceed. In hip dysplasia, the adductors usually have s t r e t c h e d i n o n e to t w o w e e k s after a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e h a r n e s s . If t h e y r e m a i n t i g h t at four to six w e e k s , percutaneous adductor tenotomy under general anesthesia and p o s s i b l y an a r t h r o g r a m m a y b e n e c e s s a r y . T h e final p r o b l e m e v i d e n t from t h i s series was poor compliance of the parents in maintaining the harness on the child. In t w o c a s e s ( C a s e s 15 a n d 1 8 ) t h e p a r e n t s d i s c o n t i n u e d use of the h a r n e s s a n d re f u s e d f u r t h e r t r e a t m e n t . I n four p a t i e n t s ( C a s e s 2 , 3 , 1 1 , a n d 1 3 ) , a n o t h e r b r a c e alter native was necessary because of poor ac ceptance b y the parents. Better parental education b y the orthopaedist as to the dis ease process b e i n g treated and the use of t h e h a r n e s s m i g h t h a v e o b v i a t e d t h e s e dif ficulties. patient with congenital dislocation of the hip does not guarantee reduction of the h i p . T h e important aspects in the use of the h a r n e s s i n c l u d e : (1) a p p r o p r i a t e i n d i c a t i o n s , (2) a d e q u a t e h i p f l e x i o n i n t h e h a r n e s s a s v e r i f i e d b y r o e n t g e n o g r a m s , (3) u s e o f a g o o d - q u a l i t y h a r n e s s , (4) c o n f i r m a t i o n o f c o n c e n t r i c r e d u c t i o n after t h r e e w e e k s o f h a r n e s s u s e , (5) m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e p a tient in the harness until a normal clini cal a n d r o e n t g e n o g r a p h i c e x a m i n a t i o n is a c h i e v e d , a n d (6) e d u c a t i o n o f t h e p a r e n t s . 4,6 NOTES 1Dorr, W.M.: Erfahrungen mit dem Riemenbugel n a c h Pavlik in der Behandlung der sog a n g e b o r e n e n Huftgelenks luxation u n d ihrer 2 E r l a c h e r , P.J.: Early Treatment of Dysplasia of the H i p J . I n t e m a t . Coll. Surg., 38: 3 4 8 - 3 5 4 , 1962 F r i e d , A m n o n , and Seelenfreund, M.: The Treatment of Congenital Dislocation o f the Hip by the Pavlik Strap Brace Bull H o s p Joint Dis., 30: 1 5 3 - 1 6 3 , 1969. K a l a m c h i , A.; O ' C o n n o r , J . ; a n d M c E w e n , G.D.: Evaluation of the Pavlik H a r n e s s in the Treatment of Congenital Dislocation of the H i p . Read at the Annual Meeting of T h e A m e r i c a n A c a d e m y of O r t h o p a e d i c Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, F e b . 1978. P a v l i k , Arnold: Die funktionelle B e h a n d l u n g s m e t h o d e mittels Riemenbugel als Prinzip der konservativen Therapie bei a n g e b o r e n e n Huftgelenksverrenkungen d e r Sauglinge Zeitschr O r t h o p . , 8 9 : 3 4 1 352, 1957 3 4 s 6 R a m s e y , P.; Lasser, Stephen; a n d M a c E w e n , G.D.: Congenital Dislo cation of the Hip. U s e of the Pavlik Harness in the Child during the First Six Months of Life. J . Bone a n d Joint Surg., 5 8 - A : 1 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 4 , Oct. 1976. Suzuki, R.: S o m e Complications of Pavlik Method for the Treatment of C D H . In Proceedings of the Fourteenth World C o n g r e s s of the S o c i e t e I n t e r n a t i o n a l e d e C h i r u r g i e O r t h o p e d i q u e et d e T r a u m a t o l o g i c p 1 0 0 . Japan, 1 9 7 8 . 7 8 T o n n i s , D.: An Evaluation of C o n s e r v a t i v e and Operative Methods in the Treatment of Congenital Hip Dislocation Clin O r t h o p . , 119: 7 6 - 8 8 , 1976. 9 T o n n i s , D.: Investigation o n the C a u s e of Frequency of Avascular Necrosis in Different Closed Reductions, Primary and Secondary O p e n Reductions of C D H . In P r o c e e d i n g s of the Fourteenth World Congress of the Societe Internationale de C h i r u r g i e O r t h o p e d i q u e et de Traumatologie, p . 107. Japan, 1978 1 0 CONCLUSIONS T h e p r i m a r y difficulty a s s o c i a t e d w i t h the use o f the Pavlik harness in this series w a s failure to a c h i e v e r e d u c t i o n o f t h e d i s location. T h e orthopaedist must realize that merely applying the harness on the U e n o , R.; F u n a u c h i , M.; Kura, K.; Tamai, A.; and Nagatsuru, Y . : Die Behandlung der a n g e b o r e n e n Huftgelenksluxation durch die PavlikBandage Zeitschr O r t h o p . , 113: 1 0 9 0 - 1 0 9 5 , 1975 Dr. Mubarak is with the Division of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of California, San Diego University Hospital, 225 West Dickinson Street, San Diego, California 92103 Please address reprint requests to Dr. Mubarak, Vorstufe
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz