END SLAVERY FOR ALL Presentation to Philadelphia Quarterly Meeting October 23, 2016 Introduction Up to two years ago I had no interest in criminal justice issues. Began visiting a man serving life. Went to meet a murder, met a kind, thoughtful, young man trying to live the best life he could. Changed my views. That is a different story and in the interest of time I’m not telling it today. 1. IN RECENT YEARS THERE HAS BEEN A GROWING DISCUSSION OF THE NEED TO END WHAT IS REFERRED TO AS “MASS INCARCERATION.” There are currently 2.4 million people in US prisons. To return this number to that of the 1970s will require that 1.7 million prisoners be released and no new ones added. This will take years or even decades. Therefore, hundreds of thousands of people will continue to live in the conditions that currently exist in our prisons, both public and private. The focus of ending mass incarceration is on changing laws that put people in prison for minor drug offences, eliminating mandatory sentencing, helping people who are released to stay out. It is not focused on prison conditions as much as these other issues, which are important ones. 2. MASS INCARCERATION HAS BEEN LINKED TO A PUBLIC POLICY OR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION. THEREFORE, THE WAY TO ADDRESS ENDING MASS INCARCERTION IS TO END RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN GENERAL. This approach has led to the Black Lives Matter movement that promotes an agenda with over 60 recommendations, of which criminal justice reform is one. 1 Achieving this agenda and influencing criminal justice will take time and is an indirect, though important, way to address criminal justice reform. This approach fails to recognize that only 40% of people in prison are black. Thus, the issue of how people are treated in prison is not entirely a racial issue. An alternative approach is to approach criminal justice reform simultaneously with broader racial reform. This is the approach many organizations are taking. Both interests share the common objective of restoring the humanity of people who have been oppressed, whether for race or for criminal conduct. 3. OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF PUNISHMENT. The general public seems to believe that anyone in prison is an inherently bad person and incapable of changing. There is a tendency to think that everyone in prison is there because they have committed a violent crime in part because of the way the media focuses on violent crimes. But this is not the case; people who have committed violent crimes are in the minority. Taking away a person’s freedom is not punishment enough; their lives need to be made miserable for as long as possible and as many rights as possible taken away. That seems to be the current philosophy on which prison operation is based. Other countries have demonstrated that an emphasis on reform rather than punishment is more effective in both managing prisons and reducing recidivism. 4. THE 13TH AMENDMENT GIVES IMPLICIT SUPPORT FOR THE APPLICATION OF VERY HARSH PUNISHMENT FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF A CRIME. It states that slavery and involuntary servitude are illegal, except for people convicted of a crime. ANY crime. And not limited to while they are in prison. 2 The law though passed in 1864 was modeled on the Northwest Ordinance adopted in 1787 so it did not represent a new way of thinking after the civil war. Why was the exception included? There is no clear legislative history that explains that. Earlier versions did not include that language. However, once passed, former slave-holding states passed Black Codes designed to allow blacks to be put in prison for minor offenses and then loaned out as labor to former slave owners. 5. ARE PEOPLE IN PRISON TODAY REALLY BEING TREATED IN WAYS THAT ARE REASONABLY ANALOGOUS TO SLAVERY AND INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE? Do not mean to diminish the fact that slavery was terrible. In slavery, people were enslaved against their wills. Some argue that people are in prison because they “voluntarily” committed an act they knew was illegal. However, this overlooks the fact that in recent decades laws have been designed that allow people to be imprisoned for reasons just about as trivial as those in the Black Codes. This is why Michele Alexander refers to these recent laws, particularly drug laws, as the New Jim Crow. In cases in the late 19th century, Supreme Court defined meaning of slavery: - Compulsory service for the benefit of one’s master - Inability to obtain the fruits of ones labor - Restraint of movements except by master’s will - Constraints on right to vote, to marry, to be able to have standing in a court of law. Do similar conditions exist today? Yes, gave examples in my Viewpoint article. Some states require work with no payment; some make work optional, but if you do it you do what they say and get paid little. Can be transferred without consent or consideration of impact on family, even though PA law says to the contrary. Limitations on marriage, voting etc. Use of solitary confinement according to UN is “cruel and unusual punishment” 3 but is routinely used in all US prisons. Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1996 designed to deny prisoners access to federal courts. Exercise of control even after release. Once your “debt to society” is paid, you are not returned to status as free and full citizen. Petty parole violations, required payment of fees and fines, difficulties in getting job, housing. Maybe not quite the same or quite as harsh, but pretty close. 6. WOULD CHANGING 13TH AMENDMENT HAVE ANY REAL IMPACT ON PRISON CONDITIONS? Maybe not. But it could allow inmates to more effectively seek relief from adverse conditions. But it could have an indirect affect. Because criminal justice is mainly a state function, there are limited ways to affect policies in all states. Congress cannot do it, only Supreme Court Decisions or Constitutional amendments. The effort to change the 13th amendment could provide the opportunity for a national discussion of what we want our prison system to be and do: to reflect a desire and commitment to change from a system based on harsh punishment to one that emphasizes reform and return to society as a better person. The demonstration of a new attitude about prisons and a new attitude about prisoners, that they are not all inherently bad and incorrigible people, but capable of change. 7. WHY SHOULD QUAKERS TAKE THIS ON? Historical concern for slavery and current concern for racial justice. Consistent with our spiritual beliefs that there is that of God in everyone and everyone is capable of redemption. Two recent efforts have failed. But times have changed a little. Build on the impact of the movie 13th. Make it a spiritual issue and reach out to other spiritual communities, but don’t limit it to a spiritual issue or a Quaker issue. If we want to reduce crime 4 in general and reduce the prison population, we must provide resources to people in prison to help them change and resources to help them when they get out so that they don’t just return to prison again. (Two thirds of all people who get out are back again within three years, not always for committing a new crime.) 8. WHAT TO DO Return to your Meetings; find out if there are people who would like to join me to work on this and have them contact me. Ask your Meeting to adopt a minute of support. (See below) and ask members to sign a petition. Numbers count. Ask Quarter to adopt a minute of support Ask PYM to consider a minute of support and enlist other Yearly Meetings to join. Support ideas that come out of a working group, ie letter writing to Congress etc. DRAFT MINUTE (This is a first attempt. I could use help in refining this.) [Name of organization] supports modifying the 13th Amendment or substitute a new amendment if appropriate, to state that slavery and involuntary servitude shall not exist in the United States or apply to any citizen of the United States, without exception, or to any individual living in its states or territories. All such individuals shall be treated with equal dignity and respect, including those convicted of committing a crime, and afforded the rights of citizenship in all places and at all times including the right to vote, the right to seek redress for grievances in a court of law, and the right to be reasonably paid for or profit from ones own labor. 5 Conclusion I went to prison to visit someone who I thought was a murderer with all the stereotypical feelings attached to that word. What I found was a thoughtful, kind, gentle, young man trying to make the best of his life. What I saw was a fellow human being with the same hopes and aspirations as my own, who didn’t deserve to be spending the rest of his life in jail. I believe that that is what the Black Lives Movement and the Ending Mass Incarceration movement is all about: seeing one another as human beings, seeing paat the superficial to the Inner Light within and responding to that; and I that is at the heart of Quaker beliefs. 6 Minute adopted by SEYM The SEYM Committee for Ministry on Racism asks Monthly and Yearly Meetings to affirm, and publicize, the need for 1. The removal of the exception clause of the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution which otherwise abolishes slavery; and 2. Persons formerly in prison to have full restoration of constitutional rights and typical citizens’ rights and responsibilities (such as freedom from housing and job discrimination). The 13th Amendment reads: Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the Unites States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. We see this in light of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) Testimony on Equality and our history of efforts to abolish slavery in the United States and among Quakers. Currently, persons in prisons involuntarily work in what amounts to slavery conditions and leave prison with severely restrictive conditions of freedom that shackle their efforts for normalcy, often for the rest of their lives. 7
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz