THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases-3: Multiple trapping of neon, argon, and krypton in XnH3+ „n = 1 – 3… F. Pauzat,1,2,3,a兲 Y. Ellinger,1,2,3 J. Pilmé,2,4 and O. Mousis5,6 1 Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, UMR 7616, UPMC University Paris 06, F-75005 Paris, France Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, CNRS, UMR 7616, F-75005 Paris, France 3 Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California 95023-6099, USA 4 Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, F-69373 Lyon, France 5 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 6 Institut UTINAM, CNRS/INSU, UMR 6213, Université de Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon Cedex, France 2 共Received 13 February 2009; accepted 8 April 2009; published online 7 May 2009兲 Recent studies on the formation of XH3+ noble gas complexes have shown strategic implications for the composition of the atmospheres of the giant planets as well as for the composition of comets. One crucial factor in the astrophysical process is the relative abundances of the noble gases versus H3+. It is the context in which the possibility for clustering with more than one noble gas 共XnH3+ up to n = 3兲 has been investigated for noble gases X ranging from neon to krypton. In order to assert our results, a variety of methods have been used including ab initio coupled cluster CCSD and CCSD共T兲, MP2, and density functional BH&HLYP levels of theory. All complexes with one, two, and three noble gases are found to be stable in the Ne, Ar, and Kr families. These stable structures are planar with the noble gases attached to the apices of the H3+ triangle. The binding energy of the nth atom, defined as the XnH3+ → Xn−1H3+ + X reaction energy, increases slightly with n varying from 1 to 3 in the neon series, while it decreases in the argon series and shows a minimum for n = 2 in the krypton series. The origin of this phenomenon is to be found in the variations in the respective vibrational energies. A topological analysis of the electron localization function shows the importance of the charge transfer from the noble gases toward H3+ as a driving force in the bonding along the series. It is also consistent with the increase in the atomic polarizabilities from neon to krypton. Rotational constants and harmonic frequencies are reported in order to provide a body of data to be used for the detection in laboratory prior to space observations. This study strongly suggests that the noble gases could be sequestered even in an environment where the H3+ abundance is small. © 2009 American Institute of Physics. 关DOI: 10.1063/1.3126777兴 I. INTRODUCTION Noble gases are peculiar species whose ability to participate in molecular structures has been overlooked for many years. The practical interest in the bonding capabilities of these supposedly inert atoms started with the synthesis of the X-halide family, with Xe+关PtF6兴− being the first example.1 More noble gas compounds followed, mainly based on xenon and, to a lesser extent, on krypton. A second breakthrough came recently with the synthesis of noble gas insertion compounds where the noble gas is part of molecules traditionally used in current laboratory chemistry. Most of them have been prepared by Räsänen and his co-workers by photodissociation in the noble gas matrix, and some, such as HXeH, HXeOH, HKrCN, HXeCN, and HXeNC, present a clear astrophysical interest.2–5 In addition, theoretical studies have been undertaken, showing the strength of the bonds implied in this type of systems.6,7 At the other extremity of the binding energy scale, laboratory and theoretical studies on van der Waals complexes of noble gases with large sysa兲 Electronic mail: [email protected]. 0021-9606/2009/130共17兲/174313/15/$25.00 tems such as carbazole8,9 or small molecules10–12 have been carried out; however, the stability of these complexes, driven by dispersion forces, is very weak. In between these two extremes, we find another family of noble gas compounds with binding energies in the range of the hydrogen bonds:13,14 the ion-neutral complexes with H3+. Examples of such molecular complexes are well known in the laboratory15–18 in the form of 共H2兲nH3+. The binding energy, hereafter taken as the absolute value of the XnH3+ → Xn−1H3+ + X dissociation energy 共X = H2, Ne, Ar, Kr兲, has been reported by several authors using various experimental techniques for n = 1 with values ranging between 5.8 and 9.6 kcal/mol. The thermochemical data allowed Hiraoka18 to derive values of 6.9, 3.3, and 3.2 kcal/mol for 共H2兲nH3+ complexes with n = 1 – 3. For noble gases, much less is known; one may cite the experimental work of Hiraoka and Mori,19 who obtained thermochemical data on ArnH3+ from which they derived binding energies of 6.69, 4.56, and 4.28 kcal/mol for n = 1 – 3 and an estimation of the binding energy in NeH3+ at 0.4 kcal/mol. Considering that H3+, ubiquitous in space, is a major initiator of the ion-molecule chemistry, it is of considerable interest to know its capability to form stable complexes. Up 130, 174313-1 © 2009 American Institute of Physics Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-2 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. possible with two electrons. All calculations were performed using methods and basis sets as implemented in the 33 GAUSSIAN package. The computational procedure used in this study has been presented in detail in a previous report21 and needs only to be summarized here. FIG. 1. Stable structures of XnH3+. Basis sets are correlation-consistent34–37 cc-pVTZ and cc-pVQZ. All structures were optimized at the BH&HLYP, MP2, CCSD, and CCSD共T兲 levels with full correction of the basis set superposition error 共BSSE兲 following the counterpoise method,38 and the rotational constants were calculated accordingly. The infrared spectra were obtained within the harmonic approximation. In order to be able to treat all systems on an equal footing, compromise had to be reached between accuracy and computational requirements and the level of theory had to be limited to CCSD. No rovibrational corrections were evaluated. 共i兲 to now, attention has been focused on the complexes of H3+ with CO due to the large abundance of this molecule. These complexes have been the object of several theoretical studies20–23 with reference to the formation of HCO+ and HOC+ since they were viewed as stabilized intermediates; experimental data have been obtained on the H3+CO ion.24 A crucial factor with noble gases in space is their relative abundances compared to H3+. The motivation here is to probe whether several noble gases can be trapped by H3+. It is an extension of our previous investigations on noble gas XH3+ complexes 共X = Ne, Ar, Kr兲 that were originally limited to single complexation. 共ii兲 共iii兲 II. COMPUTATIONAL BACKGROUND From a theoretical point of view, H3+ based hydrogen ionic clusters 共H2兲nH3+ have long been of interest to theoreticians. Directly pertinent to the present work are the systematic studies on the first terms of the series since these clusters are the corresponding analogs of XnH3+. Examples that illustrate how difficult it is to describe these weakly bound structures are reported in literature.25–32 Based on the numerical experiments provided by our previous studies,13,14 three levels of theory have been employed, namely, post-Hartree– Fock 共post-HF兲 Møller–Plesset 共MP2兲, coupled cluster 关CCSD and CCSD共T兲兴, and DFT using the BH&LYP formalism. It should be noted that CCSD共T兲 calculations are irrelevant for H3+ in isolation since triple excitations are im- III. STRUCTURAL RESULTS AND SPECTRAL SIGNATURES One stable minimum was identified for each complex XnH3+ 共Fig. 1兲. This result was found for all noble gases, including xenon, at all levels of theory whatever the extension of the basis set. The case of Xe, which showed significant structural differences from the other noble gases in our previous study,14 will be discussed independently in a forthcoming report. The geometries of the XH+ diatomics,39–41 of H2 and H3+ together with the IR frequencies are reported in Table I for comparison.42–45 Since the general trends at any level of theory hold whatever the basis set is, only the results ob- TABLE I. Bond distances 共Å兲 and IR frequencies 共cm−1兲 for XH+ 共X = Ne– Kr兲 and hydrogenated fragments H2 and H3+. Note that refers to the harmonic vibrational frequencies, while 0 refers to the observed 共anharmonic兲 fundamentals. NeH+ Methoda r b ArH+ r c KrH+ r d H 3+ r e,f,g H2 共A1兲 共E兲 r h CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ 0.989 0.987 2939 1.280 2991 1.280 2729 1.416 2739 1.413 2501 2562 CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ 0.986 0.985 2966 1.278 3015 1.278 2750 1.413 2759 1.411 2520 0.874 2578 0.875 3437 3432 2772 0.742 2763 0.742 4407 4414 MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ 0.992 0.990 2908 1.278 2957 1.279 2739 1.411 2752 1.409 2526 0.870 2593 0.871 3484 3481 2820 0.736 2813 0.737 4525 4531 BH&HLP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ 0.990 0.990 2898 1.281 2913 1.282 2710 1.421 2715 1.421 2528 0.872 2534 0.873 3459 3456 2780 0.736 2778 0.737 4512 4516 Expt. 共兲 Expt. 共0兲 0.9912 2904 1.2804 2711 1.4212 2495 0.8734 3178 2521 a With 2 electrons, triple excitations are not possible 共H2 and H3+兲. The more that can be done is CCSD. b Ram et al. 共Ref. 39兲. c Johns 共Ref. 40兲. 0.7414 4401 4161 Warner et al. 共Ref. 41兲. Cencek et al. 共Ref. 43兲. f Ketterle et al. 共Ref. 44兲. g Oka 共Ref. 45兲. h Huber and Herzberg 共Ref. 42兲. d e Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-3 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases FIG. 2. Schematic normal modes for XnH3+ 共n = 1 – 3兲. tained with the cc-pVQZ basis set will be discussed. In order to provide some help in the identification of these complexes, we also propose best estimates of the spectral signatures at the end of each section. For rotational constants, we have shown in our previous study on ArH3+ 共the only complex observed to our best knowledge兲 that the CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ level of theory provides the results closest to the experiment. We consider here that this approach is also valid for the other noble gases and is therefore able to provide a best estimate of the unknown spectroscopic constants. Due to the close agreement with the MP2/cc-pVQZ calculations, we found that it is worth reporting the values obtained at this much less expensive level of theory. For IR frequencies, we rely on the close agreement of the CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ calculations of structures and energy differences with the corresponding MP2 treatments. The discussion on the IR signatures will mainly follow the MP2/cc-pVQZ calculations, and the schematic normal coordinates are given in Fig. 2. It is well known that applying proper scaling factors to the high frequency vibrations provides best estimates of the actual spectra. Here, one considers that the ratio of the observed to the calculated frequencies for H3+ in isolation 共see Table I兲 can be applied to the frequencies of the H3+ fragment within the complexes. For that reason, the discussion on the symmetric/antisymmetric bending vibrations will be presented in terms of the frequency shifts with respect to isolated H3+. No scaling procedure is applied at low wave numbers in this case. It relies on the fact that the only known experimental frequency for a noble gas H3+ complex, estimated from the centrifugal distortion of the microwave spec- trum of the ArH3+, namely, 6 ⬃ 475 cm−1, is perfectly reproduced by the MP2/cc-pVQZ as it already was at the CCSD共T兲 level.13,14 A. The Ne complexes 1. Structure of NenH3+ complexes The structural parameters of the 共Ne兲nH3+ 共n = 1 – 3兲 clusters are given in Table II. With one Neon atom, the complex is clearly made of a neutral Ne atom interacting with H3+. The optimized geometry, with Ne– HNe distances of ⬃1.72 Å 共DFT兲, 1.79 Å 共MP2兲, and 1.78 Å 关CCSD共T兲兴, reveals a long-range interaction; this distance being close to twice that of NeH+ 共0.99 Å兲 in isolation.39 The interatomic distances in the H3+ part are close to the 0.874 Å calculated at the CCSD level for the ion in isolation 共0.870 Å at MP2兲 and in excellent agreement with experiment; H – HNe is only ⬃0.008 Å longer and H–H is ⬃0.014 Å smaller. With two Neon atoms, the Ne– HNe distance increases by ⬃0.05 Å for all theoretical approaches. The post-HF values are systematically ⬃0.07 Å larger than in DFT. In this complex, the HNe – HNe distance is 0.013 Å larger than for H3+ in isolation, whereas HNe – H is 0.007 Å shorter 关CCSD共T兲兴. The net result is an overall shortening of the HNe – H bonds by ⬃0.01 Å with respect to NeH3+. With three Neon atoms, one observes an additional lengthening of the noble gas to H3+ distance by ⬃0.03 Å in the average for all levels of theory. The structure of the H3+ fragment is now the same as that in isolation. The variation in the Ne– HNe distance with the level of theory, i.e., the systematic shortening observed in DFT calculations, compared to MP2 and coupled cluster, simply il- Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-4 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. TABLE II. Optimized geometries 共Å兲 for NenH3+ after full correction of the BSSE artifact. Ne– HNe HNe – H NeH3+ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ 1.780 1.807 1.804 1.835 1.787 1.812 1.723 1.723 0.882 0.882 0.881 0.881 0.878 0.878 0.884 0.885 Ne2H3+ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVTZ 1.824 1.853 1.846 1.877 1.832 1.858 1.773 1.778 0.867 0.870 0.868 0.870 0.865 0.866 0.866 0.867 Ne3H3+ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ 1.855 1.886 1.878 1.909 1.866 1.892 1.811 1.817 HNe – HNe H–H 0.860 0.862 0.861 0.863 0.856 0.858 0.855 0.855 0.887 0.887 0.885 0.885 0.883 0.883 0.890 0.890 0.874 0.875 0.874 0.874 0.871 0.871 0.874 0.874 lustrates the lack of an accurate description of the dispersion effects in the first method. It should be mentioned that the MP2 level of theory gives the closest values to CCSD共T兲. 2. Spectral signatures of the NenH3+ complexes To our knowledge, there is no experimental information available on these neon complexes. Our best estimates of the rotational constants are the CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ values reported below. It is worth mentioning the quality of the MP2/cc-pVQZ calculations that give the closest values 共within ⬃0.7% at most兲 of all the post-HF treatments that we have considered in our extensive screening 共MP2 values in parenthesis兲. NeH3+:A = 1355共1368兲 GHz, B = 35.56共35.41兲 GHz, C = 34.66共34.52兲 GHz, Ne2H3+:A = 114.8共114.2兲 GHz, B = 3.147共3.132兲 GHz, C = 3.063共3.049兲 GHz, Ne3H3+:A = 3.018共2.996兲 GHz, B = 3.018共2.996兲 GHz, C = 1.509共1.498兲 GHz. The dipole moments referred to the center of mass, ⬃ 7.8 D for NeH3+ and ⬃ 4.5 D for Ne2H3+, are large enough to encourage laboratory experiments on these complexes. Ne3H3+ has no dipole moment for symmetry reasons and will not be observed in microwave spectroscopy. The harmonic frequencies in Table III show clearly two types of vibrations, namely, those at high wave numbers corresponding to the internal vibrations of the H3+ fragment and those at low wave numbers corresponding to the motions of the H3+ entity in the field of the Ne atoms. The first set of frequencies can be directly compared to the values obtained for H3+ in isolation at the same level of theory 共see Table I兲. For NeH3+, there is very little change between H3+ in the complex and in isolation: +11 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共+9 cm−1 at CCSD; +12 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲 for the 1 symmetric breathing vibration. The 2 symmetric stretching/ bending and 3 asymmetric stretching vibrations are no longer degenerate in the complex and split by ⬃20 cm−1. They are both shifted toward lower frequencies by ⫺40 and −58 cm−1, respectively, at the MP2 level 共⫺30 and −54 cm−1 at CCSD; ⫺60 and −81 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲. The lowest three frequencies are of two types: the 4 and 5 vibrations correspond to the out-of-plane and in-plane rotations of the H3+ fragment with 4 ⬎ 5, which is consistent with the fact that the structure with Ne on top of the H3+ triangle is higher in energy than that where Ne is in the plane of the triangle between two H atoms.14 The lowest frequency 6 represents the dissociation coordinate into Ne+ H3+. For Ne2H3+, the 1 symmetric breathing vibration of the + H3 fragment remains close to that of the ion in isolation. The symmetric stretching/bending and asymmetric stretching vibrations swap positions with respect to NeH3+: the former is shifted to lower frequencies by −100 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共−72 cm−1 at CCSD; −108 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲, whereas the latter is also shifted to lower frequencies, but to a smaller extent 共⫺45, ⫺32, and −61 cm−1 at MP2, CCSD, and BH&HLYP, respectively兲. Among the six remaining low frequencies, the first five account for the displacements of the H3+ triangle with respect to the frozen Ne atoms, the last one being a very loose mode that can be assigned to the stretching vibration of Ne–Ne. The in- and out-of-plane rotations are represented by 5, 4, and 7, respectively, whereas 8 and 9 describe the departure of H3+ from the Ne–Ne system. For Ne3H3+, the three high frequencies are very similar to those of H3+ in isolation with one A1 and two degenerate E⬘ modes. The totally symmetric stretching is practically unaffected, whereas the E⬘ vibrations are shifted to lower frequencies by −71 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共−55 cm−1 at CCSD; −88 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲. The nine remaining low frequencies do not involve any modification of the H3+ entity. One has the three rotations of the H3+ triangle inside the Ne3 triangle 共in-plane 4 and out-of-plane 5 and 6兲, then the in-plane degenerate displacements of H3+ inside the Ne3 Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-5 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases TABLE III. IR harmonic frequencies 共cm−1兲, absolute intensities 共km/mol兲, and ZPE corrections 共a.u.兲 for NenH3+ at the CCSD 共top兲, MP2 共middle兲, and BH&HLYP 共bottom兲 levels of theory 共cc-pVQZ basis set兲. NeH3+ Frequency Ne2H3+ Ne3H3+ 1 3446 3495 3471 共2兲 共1兲 共1兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 3445 3476 3453 共5兲 共5兲 共7兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 3447 3474 3443 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 2 2742 2780 2720 共380兲 共421兲 共470兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 2740 2775 2719 共426兲 共481兲 共523兲 1B2 1B2 1B2 2717 2749 2692 共383兲 共422兲 共454兲 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 3 2718 2762 2699 共161兲 共175兲 共173兲 1B2 1B2 1B2 2700 2720 2672 共236兲 共258兲 共270兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 2717 2749 2692 共383兲 共422兲 共454兲 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 4 408 415 443 共5兲 共5兲 共6兲 1B1 1B1 1B1 449 487 485 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A2 1A2 1A2 446 463 479 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A⬘2 1A⬘2 1A⬘2 5 299 305 327 共12兲 共12兲 共13兲 2B2 2B2 2B2 390 417 431 共47兲 共35兲 共92兲 2B2 2B2 2B2 439 459 470 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 6 297 301 349 共417兲 共424兲 共441兲 3A1 3A1 3A1 308 320 347 共422兲 共448兲 共395兲 3A1 3A1 3A1 439 459 470 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 7 287 305 318 共18兲 共17兲 共16兲 1B1 1B1 1B1 318 323 352 共427兲 共435兲 共447兲 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 8 236 246 281 共280兲 共281兲 共291兲 3B2 3B2 3B2 318 323 352 共427兲 共435兲 共447兲 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 9 38 38 40 共30兲 共30兲 共27兲 4A1 4A1 4A1 107 109 120 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 10 90 95 103 共226兲 共222兲 共216兲 1A⬙2 1A⬙2 1A⬙2 11 27 28 31 共8兲 共8兲 共7兲 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 12 27 28 31 共8兲 共8兲 共7兲 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 3E⬘ ZPE correction 0.022 58 0.022 96 0.022 80 triangle 共7 and 8兲; the out-of-plane movement of H3+ through the Ne3 triangle 共10兲 is very similar to ammonia inversion. Finally, one has the three typical motions of the Ne atoms at low frequencies 共9, 11, and 12兲. Finally, the variation in the total zero point energy 共ZPE兲 shows a regular increase with the number of coordinated 0.024 13 0.024 57 0.024 48 0.025 27 0.025 65 0.025 59 noble gases which is mainly due to the associated increasing number of vibrations. The technique used to produce these transient species will most probably lead to a mixture of H3+ and the three complexes. The analysis of the infrared spectra will be a difficult task since the infrared intensities are concentrated in the same frequency range for the three com- Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-6 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. plexes. At any rate, the stretching deformations of the H3+ fragment will be difficult to assign to a particular complex since they are very close and of comparable intensities. In such a situation, one could have thought that the Raman spectra might be useful in distinguishing the vibrational spectra of the NenH3+ clusters. Unfortunately, the Raman intensities are also very close and, consequently, cannot help in solving the problem. The same difficulty will have to be faced on the low frequency side since all the most intense vibrations are around 300– 350 cm−1 in the three complexes. IR frequencies 共cm−1兲 as well as relative intensities 共in parentheses兲 are reported below at the MP2/cc-pVQZ level when larger than 10% of the most intense one is taken as reference, NeH3+:2 = 2485共0.9兲, 3 = 2469共0.4兲, 6 = 301共1.0兲, Ne2H3+:2 = 2481共1.0兲, 5=417共0.1兲, 3 = 2432共0.5兲, 6=320共0.9兲, Ne3H3 :2/3 = 2471共0.9兲, + 8=246共0.6兲, ArHAr MP2/cc-pVQZ frequencies are in excellent agreement with the corresponding CCSD共T兲 frequencies obtained in our previous study for the first term of the series, NeH3+, 3 = 2463 cm−1, 6 = 314 cm−1 . HAr – H HAr – HAr CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ ArH3+ 1.818 0.937 1.808 0.942 1.844 0.930 1.835 0.934 1.823 0.931 1.820 0.934 1.795 0.946 1.791 0.948 CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVTZ Ar2H3+ 1.996 0.871 1.993 0.871 2.014 0.869 2.011 0.870 1.990 0.867 1.991 0.868 1.990 0.867 1.984 0.868 0.932 0.936 0.928 0.931 0.929 0.931 0.939 0.941 CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ Ar3H3+ 2.082 2.083 2.099 2.099 2.079 2.081 2.088 2.082 0.887 0.888 0.885 0.886 0.884 0.885 0.886 0.887 7/8 = 318共1.0兲, 10 = 90共0.3兲. 2 = 2484 cm−1, TABLE IV. Optimized geometries 共Å兲 for ArnH3+ after full correction of the BSSE artifact. H–H 0.826 0.825 0.832 0.827 0.823 0.823 0.818 0.818 B. The Ar complexes 1. Structure of ArnH3+ complexes The structural parameters of the 共Ar兲nH3+ 共n = 1 – 3兲 clusters are given in Table IV. With one argon atom,14,46 the complex shows a stronger interaction between the noble gas and the positive ion, although the ArH3+ distance remains far from the 1.28 Å in ArH+ in isolation.40 The longer distance between Ar and HAr mainly reflects the larger size of Ar with respect to Ne. Comparing the levels of theory, this Ar– HAr distance of ⬃1.79 Å 共DFT兲 is smaller than ⬃1.82 Å in post-HF methods 关either MP2 or CCSD共T兲兴. With respect to the neon complex, the difference between the two types of methods is smaller because the contribution of van der Waals forces is relatively less important due to the increased role of electronic charge transfer 共CT兲 共see Sec. IV, below兲. The H3+ part is more affected since H – HAr is now ⬃0.07 Å longer, while H–H is ⬃0.05 Å smaller than for the ion in isolation. With two argon atoms, the Ar– HAr distance increases by ⬃0.17 Å. At the same time, the H3+ fragment is modified so that two of its bonds 共H – HAr兲 are close to the ion in isolation, which represents an overall shortening of the H – HAr bonds by ⬃0.06 Å with respect to ArH3+, In this structure, the 共HAr – HAr兲 distance remains ⬃0.6 Å larger; DFT and post-HF methods give close geometries. With three argon atoms, the preceding trends are confirmed. The Ar– HAr is further increased by ⬃0.10 Å and the H3+ fragment is ⬃0.01 Å different from its structure in iso- lation. One observes here again that the MP2 and CCSD共T兲 values are very close. The BH&HLYP calculations present the same behavior, giving practically the same values. 2. Spectral signatures of the ArnH3+ complexes Only a limited set of spectroscopic data is available for ArH3+. Tentative values were first obtained by proper scaling of the ArD3+ spectrum according to the H/D ratio of the atomic masses. Further studies involving mixed H/D species by Bogey et al.47 provided additional spectroscopic data that were used as input to more elaborate rigid, semirigid, and flexible models. Within these models, the rotational constants were adjusted to reproduce the experimental spectra to the best possible. Three sets of the so-called experimental values were obtained, from which a set of experimental constants can be estimated 共with a large uncertainty on the A constant兲, A = 1490 GHz, B = 30.8866 GHz, C = 30.1464 GHz. A complete discussion of the rotational spectrum has been presented in a previous report.14 It was shown that the quality of the results of the quantum calculations is at least equal to that of the experimental values deduced from the analysis of spectroscopic data based on phenomenological models. The CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ level of theory was found to be the Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-7 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases best level to use for theoretical predictions; besides, the present study confirms the remarkable quality of the MP2 calculations 共see values in parentheses兲, ArH3+:A = 1469共1481兲 GHz, B = 30.84共30.85兲 GHz, C = 30.21共30.22兲 GHz, Ar2H3+:A = 89.68共90.46兲 GHz, B = 1.390共1.398兲 GHz, C = 1.369共1.377兲 GHz, Ar3H3+:A = 1.251共1.257兲 GHz, B = 1.251共1.257兲 GHz, C = 0.6257共0.6284兲 GHz. Besides ArH3+ whose high dipole moment 共 ⬃ 7.2 D兲 should favor detection, Ar2H3+ seems also a reasonable target for microwave spectroscopy 共 ⬃ 3.9 D兲; Ar3H3+ will not be observed for symmetry reasons. The harmonic vibrational frequencies of the ArnH3+ clusters 共n = 1 – 3兲 are reported in Table V together with the corresponding absolute intensities. As for Ne, the spectrum of any of these complexes shows two well-separated domains corresponding to the internal vibrations of the H3+ fragment 共high frequencies兲 and to the movements with respect to the Ar atoms at low frequencies. For ArH3+, the harmonic frequencies corresponding to the H3+ fragment of the complex are significantly different from those of the free ion. The symmetric stretching 1 is shifted to higher frequencies by +149 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共+130 cm−1 at CCSD; +180 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲. As for NeH3+, the originally degenerate deformations of the H3+ ion are shifted to lower wave numbers, i.e., −455 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共−410 cm−1 at CCSD; ⫺497 at BH&HLYP兲 for the symmetric stretching 2 and −664 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共578 cm−1 at CCSD; −697 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲 for the 3 asymmetric stretching/bending. The lowest three frequencies 4 and 5 are the out-of-plane and in-plane rotations of the H3+ fragment, with 4 ⬎ 5, which is consistent with the fact that the structure with Ar on top of the H3+ triangle is higher in energy than that where Ar is in the plane of the triangle between two H atoms.14 The lowest frequency 6 represents the dissociation coordinate into Ar+ H3+. For Ar2H3+, the 1 frequency acquires a strong component on the weaker HAr – HAr bond with a shift by −127 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共−99 cm−1 at CCSD; ⫺112 at BH&HLYP兲 toward lower energy when compared to H3+ in isolation. The asymmetric and symmetric stretchings 2 and 3 that involve the shorter H – HAr bonds are still shifted to lower frequency by ⫺260 and −459 cm−1, respectively, at the MP2 level, which represents an increase by 195 and 205 cm−1 compared to that of ArH3+, in agreement with the corresponding shortening of the bond lengths. At the CCSD and BH&HLYP levels, the corresponding shifts for 2 are ⫺216 and −252 cm−1; for 3 the shifts are ⫺409 and −494 cm−1. In the remaining low frequencies, the H3+ fragment moves as a whole with respect to the heavier argon atoms. In 4 and 5, one finds the out-of-plane and in-plane rotations of the H3+ triangle, with 6 being the second out-of-plane rotation. The last three vibrations can be described as the symmetric and antisymmetric displacements of the Ar atoms with respect to the H3+ triangle and the lowest frequency is mainly a weak stretching of the Ar–Ar distance. For Ar3H3+, one has an equilateral triangle of Ar atoms surrounding the equilateral triangle of H3+. The three highest frequencies are very similar to those of H3+ in isolation with one A1⬘ and two degenerate E⬘ modes shifted by ⫺197 and −296 cm−1 at the MP2 level, respectively 共⫺150 and −254 cm−1 at CCSD; ⫺182 and −301 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲. As for Ne3H3+, the nine remaining low frequencies do not involve any modification of the H3+ entity. One has three rotations of the three-hydrogen fragment 共4, 5, and 6兲 tumbling in the space defined by the three-argon triangle. Then one finds the three translations in 共7 and 8兲 and through 共9兲 the argon’s plane. Finally, the lowest three frequencies are the low frequency images of the highest three with one symmetric A1⬘ and two degenerate E⬘ modes implying only the argon atoms. Finally, the variation in the total ZPE shows a little increase between ArH3+ and Ar2H3+ compared to the same variation for the Ne complexes that is related to the shortening of the two H – HAr bonds. The addition of the third noble gas has the same consequences for the neon and argon series. As for the Ne complexes, the infrared spectra will most probably contain a mixture of H3+ and the three complexes. However, its analysis should be less difficult since the infrared intensities at high frequencies are now well separated. On the low frequency side, the ArH3+ 6 vibration should be easily identified since it is ⬃100 cm−1 apart from the most intense vibrations of Ar2H3+ and Ar3H3+ around ⬃350 cm−1. IR frequencies 共cm−1兲 and relative intensities 共in parentheses兲 when larger than 10% of the most intense one taken as reference are reported below at the MP2/ccpVQZ level, ArH3+:2 = 2112共0.1兲, Ar2H3+:2 = 2289共1.0兲, 7 = 371共0.2兲, 3 = 1927共1.0兲, 6 = 478共0.6兲, 3 = 2111共0.3兲, 8 = 360共0.5兲, Ar3H3+:2/3 = 2256共1.0兲, 7/8 = 388共0.6兲, 10 = 128共0.1兲. For information, the corresponding CCSD共T兲 frequencies obtained in our previous study for the first term of the series, ArH3+ are 2 = 2104 cm−1, 3 = 1925 cm−1, 6 = 478 cm−1 . Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-8 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. TABLE V. IR harmonic frequencies, absolute intensities 共km/mol兲, and ZPE corrections 共a.u.兲 at the CCSD 共top兲, MP2 共middle兲, and BH&HLYP 共bottom兲 levels of theory 共cc-pVQZ basis set兲. ArH3+ Frequency Ar2H3+ Ar3H3+ 1 3567 3633 3639 共25兲 共38兲 共47兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 3338 3357 3347 共29兲 共31兲 共27兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 3287 3287 3277 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 2 2362 2365 2283 共106兲 共110兲 共104兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 2556 2560 2528 共1602兲 共1746兲 共1847兲 1B2 1B2 1B2 2518 2524 2479 共1109兲 共1205兲 共1252兲 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 3 2194 2156 2083 共1630兲 共1728兲 共1741兲 1B2 1B2 1B2 2367 2361 2286 共426兲 共463兲 共454兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 2518 2524 2479 共1109兲 共1205兲 共1252兲 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 4 782 809 800 共2兲 共2兲 共3兲 1B1 1B1 1B1 731 756 741 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A2 1A2 1A2 667 691 669 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 5 597 617 615 共8兲 共9兲 共10兲 2B2 2B2 2B2 629 651 639 共21兲 共24兲 共15兲 2B2 2B2 2B2 667 691 669 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 6 455 478 490 共959兲 共1003兲 共989兲 3A1 3A1 3A1 490 515 498 共4兲 共4兲 共5兲 1B1 1B1 1B1 656 674 663 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A⬘2 1A⬘2 1A⬘2 7 352 371 358 共888兲 共307兲 共286兲 3A1 3A1 3A1 377 388 383 共651兲 共671兲 共666兲 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 8 352 360 346 共298兲 共907兲 共945兲 3B2 3B2 3B2 377 388 383 共651兲 共671兲 共666兲 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 9 40 41 42 共8兲 共8兲 共8兲 4A1 4A1 4A1 123 128 126 共122兲 共117兲 共117兲 1A⬙2 1A⬙2 1A⬙2 10 106 109 109 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 11 25 25 28 共1兲 共1兲 共1兲 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 12 25 25 28 共1兲 共1兲 共1兲 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 3E⬘ ZPE correction 0.022 69 0.022 91 0.022 57 C. The Kr complexes 1. Structure of KrnH3+ complexes The structural parameters of the 共Kr兲nH3+ clusters 共n = 1 – 3兲 are given in Table VI. With one krypton atom, the complex cannot be described any longer by a clear-cut interaction between two well-defined fragments. The H3+ frag- 0.024 73 0.024 99 0.024 57 0.025 85 0.026 10 0.025 72 ment is strongly distorted and no longer close to an equilateral triangle: the H – HKr distance of ⬃1.04 Å at the CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ level 共1.01 Å at BH&HLYP兲 is ⬃0.20 Å longer than in H3+ and the H–H distance is only ⬃0.05 Å larger than for isolated H2. At the same time, the Kr– HKr distance of ⬃1.72 Å in post-HF methods or Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-9 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases TABLE VI. Optimized geometries 共Å兲 for KrnH3+ after full correction of the BSSE artifact. KrnH3+ HKr – H CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ KrH3+ 1.748 1.681 1.773 1.707 1.761 1.731 1.801 1.799 1.041 1.097 1.023 1.075 1.024 1.049 1.012 1.019 CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVTZ Kr2H3+ 2.091 2.096 2.117 2.064 2.092 2.097 2.097 2.093 0.874 0.874 0.872 0.873 0.871 0.871 0.870 0.871 CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ Kr3H3+ 2.203 2.204 2.222 2.222 2.202 2.202 2.215 2.211 HKr – HKr H–H 0.798 0.789 0.801 0.792 0.796 0.792 0.799 0.798 0.957 0.964 0.954 0.967 0.952 0.956 0.966 0.969 0.894 0.895 0.891 0.892 0.890 0.891 0.892 0.893 ⬃1.80 Å at BH&HLYP is closer to the interatomic distance of 1.42 Å in the KrH+ diatomic.41 As discussed previously,14 the situation is intermediate between the two X ¯ H3+ and XH+ ¯ H2 limit structures. With two krypton atoms, the Kr– HKr distance increases by ⬃0.30 Å. The situation is much closer to the usual finding of a noble gas interacting with H3+; two of its bonds 共H – HKr兲 are close to the ion in isolation, whereas the third one 共HKr – HKr兲 is still ⬃0.08 Å larger; DFT and post-HF methods give close geometries. The important point is the drastic shortening of the two H – HKr bond lengths by ⬃0.15 Å 共one order of magnitude larger compared to the corresponding variation in the neon series兲. With three krypton atoms, one observes a further increase in the Kr– HKr distance by ⬃0.10 Å, whereas the H3+ fragment is ⬃0.02 Å apart from its structure in isolation. Once more, the MP2 and CCSD共T兲 values are very close. 2. Spectral signatures of the KrnH3+ complexes There are no spectroscopic data available to compare with the theoretical values. The rotational constants at the CCSD共T兲 and MP2 levels 共in parentheses兲 are remarkably close, KrH3+:A = 1575共1582兲 GHz, B = 29.258共29.260兲 GHz, C = 28.724共28.730兲 GHz, Kr2H3+:A = 75.63共76.60兲GHz, B = 0.6332共0.6307兲 GHz, C = 0.6279共0.6255兲 GHz, Kr3H3+:A = 0.5428共0.5441兲 GHz, B = 0.5428共0.5441兲 GHz, C = 0.2714共0.2720兲 GHz. The dipole moments 共referred to the center of mass兲, namely, ⬃6.8 and ⬃4.8 D for KrH3+ and Kr2H3+ are large enough to encourage laboratory experiments. The harmonic vibrational frequencies of the 共Kr兲nH3+ 共n = 1 – 3兲 are reported in Table VII together with the corresponding absolute intensities. Contrary to Ne and Ar, the spectra of these complexes do not show two well-separated domains for all the complexes, which can be rationalized by the different type of bonding in KrH3+. For a better comparison with preceding results, the discussion will also focus on the MP2/cc-pVQZ calculations using the schematic normal coordinates in Fig. 2. For KrH3+, there is only one high frequency vibration, 1, corresponding to the stretching of the H2 fragment interacting with the KrH+ part of the complex. It is shifted by +361 cm−1 at the MP2 level 共+348 and +345 cm−1 at CCSD and BH&HLYP, respectively兲. The degenerate vibrations are strongly shifted by ⫺934 and −1438 cm−1 共MP2兲 to low frequencies compared to the 2 and 3 asymmetric and symmetric stretching of H3+. This trend is also reproduced at the CCSD 共⫺907 and −1416 cm−1兲 and BH&HLYP 共⫺859 and −1291 cm−1兲 levels of theory. In this complex, the H3+ fragment has lost a large part of its identity. The next two low frequencies, 4 and 5 are the out-of-plane and in-plane rotations of the H3+ triangle, whereas 6 represents the dissociation coordinate into Kr+ H3+ 共with a strong coupling with the Kr– HKr elongation兲. For Kr2H3+, the 1 frequency is now a symmetric breathing vibration shifted by −213 cm−1 at the MP2 level toward the lower energy when compared to H3+ in isolation 共⫺170 and −175 cm−1 at CCSD and BH&HLYP, respectively兲. The asymmetric and symmetric stretchings 2 and 3 that involve the HKr – H bonds are also shifted to lower frequency by ⫺421 and −706 cm−1 共MP2兲, respectively. However, it is a dramatic increase by 513 and 732 cm−1 compared to that of KrH3+ that illustrates the reconstruction of the H3+ fragment. As with Ne and Ar complexes, the remaining low frequencies hardly imply H3+. In all of them, the three-hydrogen triangle moves as a whole with respect to the heavier krypton atoms. In 4 and 5, one finds the out-of-plane and in-plane rotations of the H3+ fragment, with 6 being the second outof-plane rotation. The last three vibrations are the symmetric Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-10 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. TABLE VII. IR harmonic frequencies 共cm−1兲, absolute intensities 共km/mol兲, and ZPE corrections 共a.u.兲 for KrnH3+ at the CCSD 共top兲, MP2 共middle兲, and BH&HLYP 共bottom兲 levels of theory 共cc-pVQZ basis set兲. KrH3+ Frequency Kr2H3+ Kr3H3+ 1 3785 3845 3804 共118兲 共135兲 共134兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 3267 3271 3284 共51兲 共59兲 共39兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 3203 3186 3184 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A1 1A1 1A1 2 1865 1886 1921 共56兲 共59兲 共66兲 1B2 1B2 1B2 2419 2399 2417 共2631兲 共2810兲 共2920兲 1B2 1B2 1B2 2401 2389 2363 共1662兲 共1794兲 共1790兲 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 3 1356 1382 1489 共2067兲 共2188兲 共2171兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 2145 2114 2081 共530兲 共572兲 共533兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 2401 2389 2363 共1662兲 共1793兲 共1790兲 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 1E⬘ 4 917 925 880 共2兲 共2兲 共2兲 1B1 1B1 1B1 820 850 796 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A2 1A2 1A2 758 794 716 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 5 724 727 697 共10兲 共10兲 共10兲 2B2 2B2 2B2 703 730 685 共12兲 共12兲 共17兲 2B2 2B2 2B2 758 794 716 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 1E⬙ 6 565 625 518 共2307兲 共2091兲 共1744兲 3A1 3A1 3A1 574 612 551 共1兲 共1兲 共2兲 1B1 1B1 1B1 722 749 688 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 1A⬘2 1A⬘2 1A⬘2 7 386 414 374 共292兲 共307兲 共260兲 3A1 3A1 3A1 380 394 336 共762兲 共794兲 共762兲 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 8 318 328 371 共1200兲 共1237兲 共1213兲 3B2 3B2 3B2 380 394 336 共762兲 共794兲 共762兲 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 2E⬘ 9 30 30 32 共3兲 共3兲 共4兲 4A1 4A1 4A1 129 134 125 共88兲 共82兲 共87兲 1A⬙2 1A⬙2 1A⬙2 10 78 80 74 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 2A1 2A1 2A1 11 18 18 19 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 12 18 18 19 共0兲 共0兲 共0兲 3E⬘ 3E⬘ 3E⬘ ZPE correction 0.020 99 0.021 39 0.021 21 and antisymmetric displacements of the Kr atoms with respect to the H3+ triangle and the lowest frequency is mainly a weak stretching of the Kr–Kr distance. For Kr3H3+, one finds again the equilateral triangle of + H3 embedded in the equilateral triangle of the Kr atoms. The displacements of the hydrogen atoms corresponding to 0.024 29 0.024 49 0.024 13 0.025 61 0.025 83 0.024 92 the three highest frequencies are very similar to those of H3+ in isolation. The 1 and two degenerate 2 and 3 modes are shifted by ⫺298 and −431 cm−1 at the MP2 level, respectively 共⫺234 and −371 cm−1 at CCSD; ⫺275 and −417 cm−1 at BH&HLYP兲. As for Ne3H3+ and Ar3H3+, the nine remaining low frequencies do not involve any modifi- Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-11 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases TABLE VIII. Dissociation energies 共values in parentheses are obtained with ZPE corrections at the CCSD level兲 for XnH3+ → Xn−1H3+ + X including full BSSE corrections and ZPEs 共kcal/mol兲. XH3+ → X + H3+ X2H3+ → XH3+ + X X 3H 3+ → X 2H 3+ + X 共1.12兲 共0.89兲 0.94 0.75 1.00 0.88 1.54 1.53 共1.21兲 共1.01兲 1.06 0.88 1.19 1.00 1.63 1.67 共4.14兲 共3.46兲 3.85 3.21 4.15 3.49 4.13 3.82 共3.73兲 共3.32兲 3.63 3.10 3.93 3.35 3.63 3.39 共3.03兲 共1.20兲 2.81 1.16 2.62 2.03 4.05 3.72 共4.62兲 共3.99兲 4.33 3.75 4.68 4.08 4.39 4.08 Neon CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ CCSD共T兲/cc-pVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ 0.98共1.02兲 0.71共0.77兲 0.82 0.58 0.97 0.72 1.61 1.57 CCSD共T兲/ccpVQZ CCSD共T兲/ccpVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ 7.28共7.20兲 6.89共6.79兲 6.63 6.23 7.20 6.66 8.29 7.92 CCSD共T兲/ccpVQZ CCSD共T兲/ccpVTZ CCSD/cc-pVQZ CCSD/cc-pVTZ MP2/cc-pVQZ MP2/cc-pVTZ BH&HLYP/cc-pVQZ BH&HLP/cc-pVTZ 13.03共12.91兲 13.44共13.40兲 12.06 12.52 12.71 12.46 12.91 12.46 Argon Krypton cation of the H3+ entity. One has three rotations of the threehydrogen fragment 共4, 5, and 6兲 within the three-krypton triangle. Then one finds the three translations in 共7 and 8兲 and through 共9兲 the krypton plane. Finally, the lowest three frequencies are the low frequency images of the highest three with one symmetric A1⬘ and two degenerate E⬘ modes involving only the argon atoms. Compared to the neon and argon series, there is a sharp increase in the ZPE with the addition of the second noble gas. It is related to the electronic change in the complex that will be analyzed in Sec. IV Assuming that the IR spectrum is also a mixture of the three complexes, the signatures of each of them should be more easily identified than previously, in view of their wellseparated positions and intensity patterns. IR frequencies 共cm−1兲 and relative intensities 共in parentheses兲 when larger than 5% of the most intense one taken as reference are reported below at the MP2/cc-pVQZ level, KrH3+:2 = 3507共0.05兲, 3 = 1382共1.0兲, 6 = 625共1.0兲, 7/8 = 394共0.4兲. For information, the corresponding CCSD共T兲 frequencies obtained in our previous study for the first term of the series, KrH3+ are 1 = 3515共0.05兲, 3 = 1273共0.9兲, 6 = 618共1.0兲. IV. THE NATURE OF THE BONDING IN THE XnH3+ COMPLEXES The evolution of the binding energies corresponding to the formal reaction XnH3+ → X共n−1兲H3+ + X is given in Table VIII. The most important conclusion, as to the calculation procedures, is that all methods, post-HF and DFT, give similar results for all the noble gases. At this point, it is worth emphasizing that the most elaborate level of theory, CCSD共T兲/cc-pVQZ, is best reproduced by the MP2 calculations using the same cc-pVQZ basis set. A. Electronic versus vibrational effects Kr2H3+:2 = 2145共1.0兲, 7 = 414共0.1兲, Kr3H3+:2/3 = 2136共1.0兲, 3 = 1890共0.2兲, 8 = 328共0.4兲, Looking at the variations in the binding energies within each series shows that the three noble gases behave differently. The analysis is illustrated in Fig. 3 where the total binding energy is progressively decomposed into its compo- Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-12 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. FIG. 3. Components of the binding energy. nents. The total binding energies 共electronic+ ZPE+ BSSE corrections兲 are given in Fig. 3共a兲; neglecting the BSSE corrections leads to Fig. 3共b兲 and the electronic-only contribution is reported in Fig. 3共c兲. All the values are taken at the same CCSD/cc-pVQZ level of theory. The fact that the same evolution is observed in post-HF and in DFT calculations, for which the BSSE correction has a negligible impact on the structure calculated for these complexes,14 is a first indication that the origin of the phenomenon has very little, if any, reason to come from an artifact in the BSSE correction. It is confirmed by the calculations without implementation of the BSSE correction 关Fig. 3共b兲兴 that show strictly the same variations 共the fact that the binding energy of the second Ar and Kr atoms are very close is a pure coincidence兲. In electronic-only calculations 关Fig. 3共c兲兴, all three noble gases behave similarly with a regular decrease in the binding energy from the first to the second and third atoms. This decrease is consistent with the progressive lengthening of the distance between the X atom and the H3+ fragment and the associated dilution of the charge 关see the electron localization function 共ELF兲 analysis in Sec. IV B兴. The effect is therefore located in the vibrational contribution. More precisely, it comes from a balance between the electronic and vibrational effects. For neon, there is an unexpected but systematic increase of ⬃0.1 kcal/ mol in the binding energy from the first to the second and third Ne atom in all post-HF methods 关density functional theory 共DFT兲 calculations do not show a regular trend but the variations are too small to be significant兴. Extending the basis set from cc-pVTZ to cc-pVQZ results in a systematic increase in the binding energies by ⬃0.2 kcal/ mol. Increasing the level of correlation from CCSD to CCSD共T兲 with the cc-pVQZ on this system shows a further increase of ⬃0.2 kcal/ mol for each of the binding energies 关note that the MP2 results are in perfect agreement with CCSD共T兲兴. The explanation of this trend is that the difference between the successive ZPE of the complexes is smaller than the associated decrease in the differences in the electronic binding energies. These effects being opposite, the net result is a small increase in the total binding energies with the increasing number of associated Ne atoms. Com- pared to experiments, our best result is about double of the 0.4 kcal/mol estimated by Hiraoka and Mori19 from the thermochemical plots for the binding energy of a single Ne atom. For argon, the binding energy decreases from the first to the second and third Ar atoms, which is consistent with the progressive lengthening of the distance between the argon atoms and the H3+ fragment. There is almost a factor of 2 between the binding of ArH3+ and that of Ar2H3+ 共7.2 versus 4.1 kcal/mol兲 at the CCSD共T兲 level. The bonding of the third Ar is slightly lower than that of the second one 共3.7 kcal/ mol兲. Comparison with the available experimental dissociations energies19 of 6.69, 4.56, and 4.28 kcal/mol for ArnH3+ 共n = 1 – 3兲 shows a remarkable agreement between theoretical and experimental values. Although the numerical values may still be a matter of discussion, it is worth mentioning that the general trend is the same as for the pure hydrogen clusters. In this case, the difference between the successive ZPE is fairly constant, which explains that the variation in the total binding energy parallels that of the electronic energy. For krypton, the binding energy is minimum for the second Kr atom. One observes a large decrease, by ⬃10 kcal/ mol, in the binding energy of the second Kr atom, followed by a slight increase with the addition of the third atom. This unexpected behavior is found whatever the type of post-HF or DFT calculation. With one krypton, it has been shown that there is a significant contribution of the KrH+ ¯ H2 structure that vanishes with the addition of the second krypton. The second complexation restores a slightly distorted H3+ and a long distance weak interaction. The strong increase in the ZPE contribution aforementioned in the analysis of the vibrational spectra is at the origin of the sharp decrease in the binding energy. The fact that the binding of the third krypton is ⬃2 kcal/ mol larger is simply due to the small variation in the ZPE that is about the same as for the neon and argon series. B. ELF topological analysis An interpretation of the evolution of the electronic bonding properties within the XnH3+ complexes as a function of the type and the number of noble gas atoms has been obtained from a topological analysis of the ELF48,49 via addi- Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-13 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases FIG. 4. 共Color online兲 ELF localization domains 共ELF= 0.85兲 of the ArH3+, Ar2H3+, and Ar3H3+ complexes. tional calculations using the TOPMOD package.50 Localization domains were displayed with the MOLEKEL software.51 For several years, the ELF analysis has been extensively used for interpreting chemical bonding.52 Indeed, ELF is a powerful tool to describe the chemical bonds because the function is currently seen as a signature of the electronic pair distributions.53 Thus, this method makes the partitioning of the physical space into intuitive electronic regions 共volumes called basins兲 possible: core basins around nuclei and valence basins in the lone pair and bonding region. The core basins, C共X兲, where X is the noble gas, contain electrons that are not involved in the chemical bonds. The protonated basin V共X, H兲 corresponds to the X-H covalent bond, while the basin V共H兲 or V共X兲 contains valence electrons not involved in the X-H bond. Integrated quantities such as the basin population can be calculated by integrating the charge density over the basin volume. In contrast to the ELF analysis, the quantum theory of atoms in molecules 共QTAIM兲54 gives a set of basins localized around the atoms. In this framework, the contribution of an atom to the ELF population can be calculated. The ELF localization domains of the XnH3+ com- plexes are illustrated in Fig. 4, and Table IX presents the population analysis of the complexes. Figure 4 reveals several valence basins: one basin V共X兲 for each noble gas and one tricentric protonated basins V共H1 , H2 , H3兲 for the hydrogen atoms involved in the H3+ fragment. As mentioned in a previous study on the formation of XH3+ complex,14 the weak interaction between the gas X and the H3+ moiety is essentially electrostatic since no covalent bonding basin V共X, H兲 is observed. However, the ELF population analysis given in Table IX exhibits a net CT from the gas toward the H3+ fragment 共ionic contribution兲. This CT is systematically observed but its value varies with the type of complex from −0.03e 共NeH3+兲 to −0.26e 共Kr3H3+兲. This CT quantity clearly depends of the nature of the noble gas since the Kr complexes show large values 共from −0.20e to −0.26e兲, whereas the Ne complexes show very small values 共from −0.03e to −0.06e兲. It is consistent with the relative atomic polarizabilities of Ne,55 Ar,55 and Kr 共Ref. 56兲 共0.39, 1.59, and 2.49 Å3兲; the most polarizable noble gas 共Kr兲 has the largest interaction energies and the greatest degree of charge transfer with H3+. The relative values of CT between X共n−1兲H3+ and XnH3+ 共n = 1, 2, or 3兲 are shown in Fig. 5. The three gases behave similarly with a regular decrease in the relative CT from the first to the second and third atoms. This decrease is consistent with the progressive lengthening of the calculated X ¯ H3+ distance and with the electronic binding energy 共noncorrected or BSSE corrected兲 previously calculated. This result presented in Fig. 5 confirms that the stability of the complexes is mainly related to the CT X → H3+. However, the CT evolution can only provide a rationalization of the electronic component of the binding energy since the ELF population is calculated from the Kohn–Sham density without ZPE correction. The details of the evolution, for example, the singularity of the Kr2H3+ complex, can be explained only by the vibrational correction. V. CONCLUDING REMARKS In the light of this study, two levels of conclusions, i.e., quantum chemical and astrophysical, can be drawn from the TABLE IX. Population analysis 共electron兲 of the protonated basins involved in XnH3+ complexes. CT is the net charge transfer 共electron兲 calculated as CT= 2.0− Pop关V共H1 , H2 , H3兲兴. The numbering of the basins corresponds to that in Fig. 4. Complex Pop关H1兴 a Pop关H2兴 a Pop关H3兴 a Pop关V共H1 , H2 , H3兲兴 CT共X → H3+兲 H 3+ 0.67 0.67 0.67 2.00 0.00 Ne– H3+ Ne2 – H3+ Ne3 – H3+ 0.51 0.55 0.69 0.76 0.55 0.69 0.76 0.94 0.69 2.03 2.05 2.06 ⫺0.03 ⫺0.05 ⫺0.06 Ar– H3+ Ar2 – H3+ Ar3 – H3+ 0.45 0.58 0.73 0.84 0.58 0.73 0.84 0.99 0.73 2.13 2.16 2.18 ⫺0.13 ⫺0.16 ⫺0.18 Kr– H3+ Kr2 – H3+ Kr3 – H3+ 0.47 0.59 0.75 0.87 0.59 0.75 0.87 1.06 0.75 2.20 2.24 2.26 ⫺0.20 ⫺0.24 ⫺0.26 Atomic contributions of hydrogen to the population of tricentric protonated basin V共H1 , H2 , H3兲. a Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-14 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 Pauzat et al. FIG. 5. Relative CT 共X → H3+ for X = Ne, Ar, and Kr兲 of the noble gas complexes 共in electrons兲 calculated as 关CT共XnH3+兲 − CT共X共n−1兲H3+兲兴 with n = 1, 2, 3. clustering of the noble gases around the H3+ ion. Concerning the chemical aspect, we have shown that clustering up to three noble gases was possible for neon, argon, and krypton atoms. This result was obtained using post-HF 关CCSD and CCSD共T兲兴 levels of wave functions as well as DFT 共BH&HLYP兲 coupled with correlation-consistent basis sets of high flexibility. The BSSE artifact was corrected all along the optimization process using the counterpoise method, which is necessary to obtain reliable values. The point in common is that all the complexes are planar, with the noble gases linked to the apices of the H3+ triangular fragment. The topological analysis of their ELF has shown that the electronic binding energies are directly linked to the magnitude of the charge transfer from the noble gas to the H3+ ion. This general behavior is related to the increasing polarizability of the noble gases from Ne to Ar and Kr. In fact, both effects, i.e., the CT X → H3+ and the polarizability of the noble gases, govern the stability of these complexes. From a strict computational point of view, we have found that the cost effective MP2 calculations provide energetic values and rotational constants close to the expensive CCSD共T兲 treatments when the flexible cc-pVQZ basis set was employed in both approaches. Rotational constants have been proposed that should be an incentive for new laboratory experiments in view of the values of the dipole moments of the neon, argon, and krypton complexes. Besides, theoretical IR spectra show characteristic bands with strong intensities that should be detectable even if these complexes are of low abundance. Concerning the astrophysical aspect, it should be remembered that the H3+ ion is ubiquitous in space, as illustrated by recent detections in a large variety of environments: in star forming regions,57 in diffuse interstellar media,58 at the poles of Jupiter59 and of the other giant planets;60 it has also been detected under its deuterated form H2D+ in a prestellar core61 and in protoplanetary disks.62 The stability of XnH3+ complexes has important astrophysical implications because the sequestration of noble gases by H3+ may greatly influence their abundances in bodies such as giant gaseous planets, icy satellites, or comets. Indeed, such trapping, if effective in space, would imply that noble gases stay in the gas phase of protoplanetary disks instead of being incorporated into the planetesimals that ultimately take part in the formation of the planets. In particular, the fact that more than one Kr can be trapped may be decisive for the sequestration of this atom in regions where the radiation field leads to abundances of H3+ comparable to that of this species. For example, an important fraction of Kr may have been sequestered by H3+ in the solar nebula gas phase, thus implying the formation of at least partly Kr-impoverished planetesimals in the formation zones of Jupiter and Saturn.63–65 In the case of Titan, which is the second largest satellite in the solar system, the noble gas deficiency measured in the atmosphere by the Huygens probe during its descent66 may also result from the sequestration of at least Kr by H3+ in the solar nebula gas phase before the formation of its building blocks.67 Moreover, the stability of the XH3+ clusters may also be an important factor for discriminating the origin of comets according to their heliocentric distance of formation.63,64 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank one of the referees for his positive suggestions and careful reading of the manuscript. This research has been supported by an IBM joint study under the hospitality of the Almaden Research Center and by the CNRS “Programme National de Planétologie.” The largest calculations have been performed at the CINES supercomputing facility. N. Bartlett, Proc. Chem. Soc., London 218 共1962兲. M. Pettersson, J. Lundell, and M. Räsänen, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 205 共1995兲. 3 M. Pettersson, L. Khriachtchev, L. Lundell, and M. Räsänen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 11904 共1999兲. 4 M. Pettersson, J. Lundell, L. Khriachtchev, and M. Räsänen, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 618 共1998兲. 5 L. Khriachtchev, M. Pettersson, N. Runeberg, J. Lundell, and M. Räsänen, Nature 共London兲 406, 874 共2000兲. 6 S. A. Cooke and M. C. L. Gerry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 17000 共2004兲. 7 T. K. Ghanty, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 124304 共2006兲. 8 T. Burgi, T. Droz, and S. Leutwyler, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7228 共1995兲. 9 T. A. Wesolowski, P. Y. Morgantini, and J. Weber, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6411 共2002兲. 10 J. van Wijngaarden and W. Jäger, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6504 共2001兲. 11 K. Patel, P. R. Butler, A. M. Ellis, and M. D. Wheeler, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 909 共2003兲. 12 J. Han, D. Philen, and M. C. Heaven, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 054314 共2006兲. 13 F. Pauzat and Y. Ellinger, Planet. Space Sci. 53, 1389 共2005兲. 14 F. Pauzat and Y. Ellinger, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 014308 共2007兲. 15 R. Clampitt and L. Gowland, Nature 共London兲 223, 815 共1969兲. 16 A. van Deursen and J. Reuss, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 11, 483 共1973兲. 17 A. van Lumig and J. Reuss, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 27, 197 共1978兲. 18 K. Hiraoka, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 4048 共1987兲. 19 K. Hiraoka and T. Mori, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4821 共1989兲. 20 D. A. Dixon, A. Komornicki, and W. P. Kraemer, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3603 共1984兲. 21 D. Talbi and F. Pauzat, Astron. Astrophys. 181, 394 共1987兲. 22 D. Talbi and F. Pauzat, Astron. Astrophys. 229, 253 共1990兲. 23 S. A. Maluendes, A. D. McLean, and E. Herbst, Astrophys. J. 397, 477 共1992兲. 24 E. J. Bieske, S. A. Nizkorodov, F. R. Bennett, and J. P. Maier, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 5152 共1995兲. 1 2 Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp 174313-15 25 J. Chem. Phys. 130, 174313 共2009兲 H3+ as a trap for noble gases Y. Yamaguchi, J. F. Gaw, and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 4074 共1983兲. 26 Y. Yamaguchi, J. F. Gaw, R. B. Remington, and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 5072 共1987兲. 27 M. Farizon, B. Farizon-Mazuy, N. V. De Castro Faria, and H. Chermette, Chem. Phys. Lett. 177, 451 共1991兲. 28 M. Farizon, H. Chermette, and B. Farizon-Mazuy, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 5951 共1991兲. 29 T. Pang, Chem. Phys. Lett. 228, 555 共1994兲. 30 I. Stich, D. Marx, M. Parinello, and K. Terakura, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9482 共1997兲. 31 E. W. Ignacio and S. Yamabe, Chem. Phys. Lett. 287, 563 共1998兲. 32 M. Barbatti, G. Jalbert, and M. A. C. Nascimento, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 4230 共2000兲. 33 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., GAUSSIAN 03, Revision C.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004. 34 T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007 共1989兲. 35 D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1358 共1993兲. 36 A. K. Wilson, K. A. Peterson, D. E. Woon, and T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7667 共1999兲. 37 K. A. Peterson, D. Figgen, E. Goll, H. Stoll, and M. Dolg, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 11113 共2003兲. 38 S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys. 19, 553 共1970兲. 39 R. S. Ram, P. F. Bernath, and J. W. Brault, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 113, 451 共1985兲. 40 J. W. C. Johns, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 106, 124 共1984兲. 41 H. E. Warner, W. T. Conner, and R. C. Woods, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5413 共1984兲. 42 K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg, Constants of Diatomic Molecules 共Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1979兲. 43 W. Cencek, J. Rychlewski, R. Jaquet, and W. Kutzelnigg, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2831 共1998兲. 44 W. Ketterle, H. P. Messmer, and H. Walthet, Europhys. Lett. 8, 333 共1989兲. 45 T. Oka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 531 共1980兲. 46 E. M. Simandiras, J. F. Gaw, and N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 141, 166 共1987兲. 47 M. Bogey, H. Bolvin, C. Demuynck, J. L. Destombes, and B. P. Van Eijck, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4120 共1988兲. 48 A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397 共1990兲. B. Silvi and A. Savin, Nature 共London兲 371, 683 共1994兲. R. Llusar, A. Beltrán, J. Andréas, S. Noury, and B. Silvi, J. Comput. Chem. 20, 1517 共1999兲. 51 P. Flukiger, H. P. Luthi, H. P. S. Portman, and J. Weber, MOLEKEL, Swiss Center for Scientific Computing, Manno, Switzerland, 2000. 52 J. Poater, M. Duran, M. Sola, and B. Silvi, Chem. Rev. 共Washington, D.C兲 105, 3911 共2005兲; J. Pilmé, H. Berthoumieux, P. Fleurat-Lessard, and V. Robert, Chem.-Eur. J, 13, 5388 共2007兲; C. Gourlaouen and O. Parisel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 119, 559 共2007兲; R. Llusar, A. Beltrán, J. Andrés, S. Noury, and B. Silvi, J. Comput. Chem. 20, 1517 共1999兲. 53 B. Silvi, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 3081 共2003兲. 54 R. F. W. Bader, Atoms in Molecule: A Quantum Theory 共Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990兲. 55 N. K. Rahman, A. Rizzo, and D. L. Weager, Chem. Phys. Lett. 166, 565 共1990兲. 56 A. Kumar and W. J. Meath, Can. J. Chem. 63, 1616 共1985兲. 57 T. R. Geballe and T. Oka, Nature 共London兲 384, 334 共1996兲. 58 B. J. McCall, K. H. Hinkle, T. R. Geballe, G. H. Moriarty-Schieven, N. J. Evans II, K. Kawaguchi, S. Takano, V. V. Smith, and T. Oka, Astrophys. J. 567, 391 共2002兲. 59 J. P. Maillard, P. Drossart, J. K. G. Watson, S. J. Kim, and J. Caldwell, Astrophys. J. 363, L37 共1990兲. 60 S. Miller, N. Achilleos, G. E. Ballester, T. R. Geballe, R. D. Joseph, R. Prangée, D. Rego, T. Stallard, J. Tennyson, L. M. Trafton, and J. Waite, Jr., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 358, 2485 共2000兲. 61 P. Caselli, F. F. S. Van der Tak, C. Ceccarelli, and A. Bacmann, Astron. Astrophys. 403, L37 共2003兲. 62 C. Ceccarelli and C. Dominik, Astron. Astrophys. 440, 583 共2005兲. 63 F. Pauzat, Y. Ellinger, and O. Mousis, Lunar Planet. Sci. 37, 1331 共2006兲. 64 O. Mousis, F. Pauzat, Y. Ellinger, and C. Ceccarelli, Astrophys. J. 673, 637 共2008兲. 65 O. Mousis, U. Marboeuf, J. I. Lunine, Y. Alibert, L. N. Fletcher, G. Orton, F. Pauzat, and Y. Ellinger, Astrophys. J. 696, 1348 共2009兲. 66 H. B. Niemann, S. K. Atreya, S. J. Bauer, G. R. Carignan, J. E. Demick, R. L. Frost, D. Gautier, J. A. Haberman, D. N. Harpold, D. M. Hunten, G. Israel, J. I. Lunine, W. T. Kasprzak, T. C. Owen, M. Paulkovich, F. Raulin, E. Raaen, and S. H. Way, Nature 共London兲 438, 779 共2005兲. 67 O. Mousis, J. I. Lunine, C. Thomas, M. Pasek, U. Marboeuf, Y. Alibert, V. Ballenegger, D. Cordier, Y. Ellinger, F. Pauzat, and S. Picaud, Astrophys. J. 691, 1780 共2009兲. 49 50 Downloaded 11 May 2009 to 134.157.90.5. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jcp.aip.org/jcp/copyright.jsp
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz