2016-2017 Curriculum Blueprint Grade: 10 Course: English 2 & English 2 Honors Quarter 3: Writing a Literary Analysis (Collection 5: Absolute Power) Test Item Specifications: 10th Grade Lexile Band: 980L Approximate Time Frame: 9 Weeks Quarter Overview By the end of Quarter 3, students will be able to apply the skills they have learned about analyzing literature from close reading to an unfamiliar prompt resulting in the product of a literary analysis (this is the Required Summative Assessment). The summative assessment, in the Performance Assessment consumable, could be given over 1 – 2 days at the end of the quarter, depending on the flexibility of your scheduling. The Common Performance Tasks are intended to address the standards of the quarter while offering choice for students and teachers. A teacher could also assign Common Performance Tasks for scaffolding purposes. These tasks would be completed near the end of the quarter, and prior to the Required Summative Assessment. Consider using the CPT Option 1 if you have yet to cover poetry analysis, as the Required Summative Assessment is a literary analysis that includes poetry. There are additional resources for poetry in the Optional Texts and Additional Resources sections. The Common Performance Tasks may be tweaked by grade level teams during PLC time. Flexibility is granted in order to address specific student, class, and school needs. The Priority Texts for this quarter focus on the topic of human ambition. The Sample Assignments were chosen to give teachers examples of tasks that support the standards necessary for students to demonstrate proficiency or approach mastery with the Common Performance Tasks and Summative Assessment; however, these are not meant to be the only assignments for the quarter. The Sample Assignments can be tweaked and/or additional assignments can be created by grade level PLCs. Should additional texts be needed/desired, it is recommended that these are chosen with the Focus Standards of the quarter in mind. * Study and application of vocabulary and grammar are meant to be taught in conjunction with what our students are reading and writing. As such, please utilize the resources and standards found in the HMH Collections. For testing purposes, there should be a greater emphasis on LAFS.910.L.1.1, 1.2, 3.4, & 3.5. Common Performance Task (Option 1) Common Performance Task (Option 2) Common Performance Task (Option 3) Analyzing the Model: Literary Analysis (Performance Assessment, pp. 65-96) Analytical Essay Multimedia Presentation LAFS.910.RL.1.1; LAFS.910.W.1.2; LAFS.910.W.3.9 LAFS.910.RL.1.1; LAFS.910.W.1.2; LAFS.910.W.3.9; LAFS.910.SL.2.5 LAFS.RL.1.1; LAFS.RL.1.2; LAFS.RL.1.3; LAFS.RL.2.4; LAFS.910.RL.3.9; LAFS.910.RI.1.3; LAFS.910.RI.2.5; LAFS.910.W.1.2; LAFS.910.W.2.5; LAFS.910.W.3.9 *This task walks students through the process of writing a literary analysis by having them examine and evaluate the elements of different pieces of literature. This collection focuses on human ambition and our eternal quest for power. In his speech “Why Read Shakespeare?” Michael Mack argues that if you don’t see yourself in Macbeth’s ambition, you’re either misreading the play or misreading yourself. Review the texts in this collection, including Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Take notes on Macbeth’s character traits and compare them to traits revealed in other texts you’ve read. Synthesize your ideas by writing an analysis that explains how one aspect (trait) of Macbeth’s character represents a universal human trait. See HMH P. 313-315 for planning details See HMH P. 316 for rubric This collection focuses on human ambition and our eternal quest for power. In his speech “Why Read Shakespeare?” Michael Mack argues that if you don’t see yourself in Macbeth’s ambition, you’re either misreading the play or misreading yourself. Review the texts in this collection, including Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Then choose a central character and identify and explore how one aspect of that character’s personality represents a universal human trait. This may take the form of a poster, Prezi, PowerPoint, etc. Possible Rubrics: http://mbf.blogs.com/files/visualpresentation-rubric.pdf http://www.qcsd.org/Page/379 Required Summative Assessment Performance Assessment: Literary Analysis p.125 After reading three texts – a biography of Edgar Allan Poe, his poem The Raven, and an essay explaining Poe’s writing process, write a literary analysis of The Raven in which you explain how the poem represents the “human thirst for self-torture” as Poe proclaimed. Support your discussion with evidence from the texts. LAFS.910.RI/RL.1.1; LAFS.RI.2.5; LAFS.RL.1.2; LAFS.RL.1.3; LAFS.RL.2.4; LAFS.910.W.1.2; LAFS.910.W.3.9 LDC Template Task IE3 Informative/Explanatory Rubric Learning Goals Sample Questions Note: Sample Essential Questions appear at the beginning of each Collection Reading: Students will be able to: Analyze text in order to provide evidence of how the text explicitly uses details Reading: to support key ideas. Draw inferences from the text in order to understand how textual analysis is developed. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support the text (explicit and inferred). Analyze how the theme or central idea of a text emerges, is shaped and refined by specific details. Interpret how the text supports key ideas or themes with specific details. Compose an objective summary of the text that includes how the central idea emerges, is shaped and is refined by specific details. Analyze how a change in one element shapes another. Determine meanings of words and phrases as they relate to meaning or tone. Determine the figurative and connotative meanings of words and phrases as they are used in the text. Analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning or tone. Analyze how an author’s choice of plot structure, order of events or manipulation of time creates an effect of mystery, tension, or surprise. How can I provide the best proof from the text to support meaning of the text? How can I summarize the text by using the details related to the theme? How does the interaction between the characters move the plot or contribute to theme? How does the author’s use of specific types of figurative language and connotation affect the meaning of the text? How does the text structure help me understand the text? Why does the structure of the text matter? How can the author’s choice to structure the text create different effects in the text? Writing: How can I use information to express an idea? How can I use domain-specific vocabulary to express ideas accurately? How can I use evidence to support my purpose? Writing: Students will be able to: Determine the appropriate formatting, graphics, and multimedia to aid comprehension. Analyze key ideas and details as evidence of understanding text. Write informative/explanatory texts that examine/convey complex ideas, concepts, and information. Write informative/explanatory texts that include relevant and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, examples, and other information appropriate to the knowledge of the topic. Write informative/explanatory texts that include formatting, graphics, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Cluster of Standards * Utilize the Deconstructed Standards document for vertical alignment, full standard, standards-based question stems, and examples of unpacking the standard into specific skills as you progress through the course of the year. Reading Writing Speaking & Listening Language LAFS.910.RL.1.2 Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. LAFS.910.RL.2.6 Analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature. LAFS.910.RL.3.7 Analyze the representation of a subject or a key scene in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment (e.g., Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” and Breughel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus). LAFS.910.RI.1.1 Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. LAFS.910.RI.1.2 Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. LAFS.910.RI.1.3 Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them. LAFS.910.RI.2.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language of a court opinion differs from that of a newspaper). LAFS.910.RI.2.5 Analyze in detail how an author’s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter). LAFS.910.RI.2.6 Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose. LAFS.910.RI.3.7 Analyze various accounts of a subject told in different mediums (e.g., a person’s life story in both print and multimedia), determining which details are emphasized in each account. LAFS.910.W.1.1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. a. Introduce claim(s), acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the reasons and evidence logically. b. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant evidence, using accurate, credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. c. Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. d. Establish and maintain a formal style. e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. LAFS.910.W.2.5 Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are defined in standards 1–3 above.) LAFS.910.W.3.8 Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. LAFS.910.W.3.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. a. Apply grade 8 Reading standards to literature (e.g., “Analyze how a modern work of fiction draws on themes, patterns of events, or character types from myths, traditional stories, or religious works such as the Bible, including describing how the material is rendered new”). b. Apply grade 8 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., “Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced”). LAFS.910.SL.1.2 Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source. LAFS.910.SL.1.3 Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence. LAFS.910.SL.2.4 Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and task. LAFS.910.SL.2.5 Make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest. LAFS.910.L.3.4 Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grades 9–10 reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies. a. Use context (e.g., the overall meaning of a sentence, paragraph, or text; a word’s position or function in a sentence) as a clue to the meaning of a word or phrase. b. Identify and correctly use patterns of word changes that indicate different meanings or parts of speech (e.g., analyze, analysis, analytical; advocate, advocacy). c. Consult general and specialized reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation of a word or determine or clarify its precise meaning, its part of speech, or its etymology. d. Verify the preliminary determination of the meaning of a word or phrase (e.g., by checking the inferred meaning in context or in a dictionary). LAFS.910.L.3.5 Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in word meanings. a. Interpret figures of speech (e.g., euphemism, oxymoron) in context and analyze their role in the text. b. Analyze nuances in the meaning of words with similar denotations. LAFS.910.RI.3.9 Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance (e.g., Washington’s Farewell Address, the Gettysburg Address, Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech, King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”), including how they address related themes and concepts. Priority Texts from Why Read Shakespeare? by Michael Mack Argument Lexile: 980L HMH TE: p. 203A Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RI.1.1; 2.5; 2.6; 3.8; LAFS.910.SL.2.4 Sample Assignments from Why Read Shakespeare? p. 203 Pre-teaching: As the Key Learning Objective for reading this selection is to have students analyze the use of rhetoric in an argument, please see the additional resources section for ideas on how to introduce this concept prior to reading the text. Students should take notes (Cornell Focused Note-Taking) to which they return and interact as they read the selection. Tracing and Evaluating Arguments (RI.3.8): Students will identify claims and supporting evidence (using Thinking Map, note taking, or the Odell Resources located in the resource section). Analyzing the Text (RI.1.1; RI.2.4; RI.2.5; RI.2.6; RI.3.8): Questions 1-4 “Analyzing the text” on HMH p. 208. Consider posting the questions around the room in a “chat station” format. Speaking Activity: Argument (RI.1.1; RI.2.4; RI.2.5; RI.2.6; RI.3.8; SL.2.4): In his speech to college freshmen, Mack presents his opinion on the value of reading Shakespeare. Evaluate how successfully he appeals to his audience by writing and delivering a brief speech of his effectiveness. Time Saving Suggestion: Have students record their speeches using an electronic device. In pairs, students take turns watching and reviewing their partner’s speech. Students may also deliver their speeches live. (HMH Performance Task p.208) Possible Rubric The Tragedy of Macbeth by William Shakespeare Drama Lexile: N/A HMH TE: 210A Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RL.1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.5 The Tragedy of Macbeth, p. 213 *Pre-teach-Shakespearean Dramatic Conventions (RL.2.5): Review Shakespearean Drama: “Characteristics of Shakespearean Tragedy” on HMH p. 210 and “The Language of Shakespeare” on HMH p. 211-212. *Also consider using video in “Additional Resources” to introduce supernatural elements in Shakespeare. *Pre-teach- Characterization (RL.1.3): Review Direct and Indirect Characterization. Consider this brief video that introduces the STEAL method. Close Read of Act I (RL.1.1; RL.1.2; RL.1.3): Students will annotate text, paying particular attention to characterization (direct and indirect) made through inference. *This is an opportunity to introduce students to the kind of annotating and inferencing they will do throughout the drama. HMH Close Reader p. 72-96. Characterization (RL.1.3): Students will choose (or teacher will assign) a central character and students will trace characterization of this individual throughout the play. This should include cited text evidence and student inferences. This may take the form of a double entry journal, Thinking Map, graphic organizer, etc. Analyze Character and Theme (RL.1.2; RL.1.3): Review how character development connects to theme. HMH p. 290. Writing Activity: Argument (RL.1.1; RL.1.2; RL.1.3; W.1.1): Is Macbeth a tragic hero? Students will refer to the introductory essay on Shakespearean Drama, and explore, in writing, which characteristics of a tragic hero Macbeth embodies, supporting their view with details from the text (HMH Performance Task p. 291). from Macbeth on the Estate by Penny Woolcock Film Lexile: N/A HMH TE: p. 293A Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RL.1.1; 2.5; 2.6; 3.7; 3.9; SL.2.4 from Macbeth on the Estate p.293 Analyze Representations (RL.3.7): Students should identify elements that are emphasized or omitted from the film and their impact on mood and tone (using Thinking Map, Focused Note-Taking, etc.) Analyzing the Media (RL.1.2; RL.3.7): Questions 1-3 “Analyzing the Media” on HMH p. 294. Again, consider posting the questions as chat stations around the room, allowing students to work in small groups. Speaking Activity: Argument (RL.1.2; RL.3.7; SL.2.4): How effective was this modern resetting of Macbeth in expressing key themes of Shakespeare’s play? Discuss your thesis in a short speech. Time Saving Suggestion: Have students post their writing online (ex. Schoology) for students to review and make constructive commentary. Or, have students get into small groups to present their speeches while being reviewed by their groupmates (HMH Performance Task p.294). Class Novel of Choice Optional Contributing Texts Selected texts from Close Reader (Teacher Choice) from The Tragedy of Macbeth by William Shakespeare Drama Lexile: N/A HMH TE: 292B Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RL.1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.4 Selected texts from Textbook (Teacher Choice) from Holinshed’s Chronicles by Raphael Holinshed The Macbeth Murder Mystery by James Thurber History Lexile: 1630 HMH TE: p. 295A Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RL.1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.4; 2.5; 2.6; 3.9 Short Story Lexile: 580 HMH TE: p. 301A Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RL.1.1; 2.4; 3.9 5 p.m., Tuesday, August 23, 2005 by Patricia Smith Poem Lexile: N/A HMH TE: p. 309A Focus Standards: LAFS.910.RL.1.1; 1.2; 1.3; 2.4; 2.5 Additional Resources Specific to Standards Introducing Supernatural Elements in Shakespeare (Video) Identifying Fallacious Reasoning (Interactive Whiteboard Lesson): HMH TE p. 209a (Accessible via HMH online platform) Analyze Argument and Rhetoric (Level Up Tutorial): HMH TE p. 209a (Accessible via “Analyzing Arguments” Level Up Tutorial on HMH online platform) Video to help students determine theme and main idea in poetry: http://study.com/academy/lesson/interpreting-a-poems-main-idea-theme.html For teachers: A strategy for teaching the identification of themes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H6GCe7hmmA Student Checklist for Evidence Based Claims Criteria (version 1): http://odelleducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/EBC-CriteriaChecklist-I-G11-12.pdf Student Checklist for Evidence Based Claims Criteria (version http://odelleducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/EBC-CriteriaChecklist-II-G11-12.pdf 2): For additional poetry choices to scaffold up to the RSA, consider pulling poems from the following links: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/features/articles/detail/70069 http://www.weareteachers.com/24-must-share-poems-for-middle-school-andhigh-school/ SOAPStone (various options available online) http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/30738_analysis.pdf TP-CASTT
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz