NON FREE FLOWING MATERIALS: Problems, Prevention and Solutions Prof Mike Bradley Director The Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology University of Greenwich Contents • Why are some materials free flowing and others not? • The nature of non free flowing bulk materials • Role of material characterisation in design • How to use characterisation economically • Other risks • Interfacing Effect of FLOW PROBLEMS? Risks the plant • Not working at all • Not achieving throughput • Not achieving satisfactory “up-time” • Not delivering the product quality required • Requiring excessive maintenance/troubleshooting • Requiring excessive manning Consequences • Financial loss • Loss of customer confidence • Loss of staff morale How well do solids processing plants work? • The Rand Report (1990) •60% of solids processing plants never achieve satisfactory operation! How high is technical risk with solids processing plants? • The Rand Report (1990) • Average cost over-run on novel • solids processing systems is 110%! • I.e. plants cost on average more than twice the original estimate on which the business case for building them was based! Why is a material not free flowing? Cohesive/adhesive • Wet materials • Very fine materials “Nesting” • Extreme shape particles that “entangle” • Mostly biomass and waste materials • Need special treatment – see 2012 and 2013 presentations by Bradley Examples of non free flowing bulk solids Cohesive/adhesive • Wet materials - examples: – Clay, sand, soil – Coal with fines • Fine powders - examples – Cement or gypsum powder – Fine lime • Fine and wet examples: • FGD gypsum, “Nesting” • • • • Chopped straw Wood chips Flake materials Waste containing shredded sheet 1826 Flow problems 3036 Flow problems 1827 Discharge pattern: Core-Flow Most common in silos and hoppers • Central discharge channel • Material flows from top surface into central flow channel • Static or “dead” regions of product • “First in last out” discharge, so gives poor stock rotation • Erratic discharge caused by product on product shear during emptying • Exaggerates segregation effects of particles • Hopper half angle shallow Flow from Top of Static Flow fromMaterial top of material Static Material Discharge Through Central “Core” Discharge pattern: Mass-Flow Achieved only in specially-engineered hoppers • • • • • Steep hopper walls All storage capacity is “live” “First in, first out” discharge Consistent discharge rate encouraged by the reduced levels of shear generated as the product discharges against relatively smooth wall material - not static product Degree of remixing during discharge minimises segregation effects All Material in Motion During Discharge Sliding on Wall of Converging Section Determination of the Mass-flow Limit –Conical Hoppers 50 θ B Angle of wall friction φ w [deg] delta j =30 deg delta j =40 deg 40 delta j =50 deg delta j =60 deg 30 delta j =70 deg Core-flow Mass-flow 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 Hopper half angle θ [deg] 50 60 Flow Stoppages Mechanical Arching Problem for very large particles if outlets under sized (Outlet dim >12x max pellet dimension Flow Stoppages Cohesive Arching Problem with cohesive or “nesting” materials Flow Stoppages ‘Rat-hole’ Problem with cohesive or nesting materials Ash Baghouse • Manual “therapy” to persuade flow • Manual digging out of half a tonne of ash from each of eight hoppers • Downtime of 40 MW power plant = 0.5% = £88,000 p.a.! 0000 Caking of silo contents Some materials SET HARD in time – special attention required Why is technical risk so high with solids handling equipment? Why do so many plants fail to satisfy? Over-emphasis on capital cost Limited knowledge of particulate properties Reliance upon equipment designs or choices used with “similar” products The “it’s always been done this way” approach What is CHARACTERISATION and how can it help? The First Rule of Warfare: KNOW YOUR ENEMY! (Sun Tzu, China, 600 BC) All bulk solids are very different To get the material to do what you want it to, you have to understand how it behaves and reacts to what effects you apply to it E.g. does it flow readily, segregate easily, fluidise with air, go hard in store, pick up moisture etc The critical importance of CHARACTERISATION Often quoted properties: Angle of repose Median particle size Neither of the above are of any real use; – They do not relate to flow properties of the material – Misleading at best Information required on: Bulk density Internal flow properties Wall friction Time dependency Particle size distribution Segregability, Friability Caking tendencies Susceptibility to moisture, reaction, storage temperature etc. Pneumatic conveying properties etc Example of use of handling properties for system design HOPPER DESIGN Objective: reliable discharge (Failure of silos and hoppers to discharge reliably is one of the most common practical failures on bulk solids handling plants) What is bulk solid “FLOWABILITY” and how is it measured? 0000 “Flow function” of a bulk solid Idealised Flow Function Test Unconfined failure test σ1 σ1=σc Diagonal failure plane σ3=0 1. Consolidation stage 2. Failure stage Broken sample 3041 Flow functions for different products 3044 Wall friction tester 1835 Wall friction measurement 1802 Mass flow limits Brookfield Powder Flow Tester • Economically priced ~ £12,000 • Software controlled • 4 basic tests • 2 – 30 minute test time • Powder volume required – 263cc standard cell – 30cc pharma cell – “Micro” cell under development Brookfield Shear Cell Wall friction lid Trough filling tools Flow function lid Trough Standard cell lid and trough, 150mm od 3041 Flow functions for different products Very cohesive Cohesive Free-flowing Diagrammatic representation of the “flow, no-flow” criterion in a hopper 3053 Flow / No Flow criteria 3406 bmin σ crit H (α ) = ρb g Where bmin = smallest outlet size for reliable discharge σcrit = critical stress in arch from flow / no flow criterion H(α) = dimensionless factor accounting for shape of converging section = bulk density of bulk solid (kg/m3) ρb Calculation of hopper minimum outlet dimension 0000 Parameters determined by design procedure 1842 The importance of good interfacing Good and bad practice in belt and screw interfacing No hammer marks! Key characterisations Hoppers and silos: Arching/rat-hole dimension (from Flow Function) Wall friction Time dependency of above Caking tendency Pneumatic conveying Chutes Impact adhesion Impact adhesion and wall friction Belt conveyors Surface adhesion Key to successful design Understand the need for measurements of the bulk solids properties Identify the properties which are likely to be important in this application Bulk solids are all different! Measure properties (or get them measured) Use sound design procedure Understand the contractual problem: Property measurements cost money! Who pays? Many buyers look only at price At tender stage, no money for measurements; Once contract let, price fixed so no opportunity for changing design! But design without proper information will lead to expensive problems! Need to educate buyer of value of proper design Cost of bulk solid property measurements through Separate contract for design Factor costs of measurement into tender Conclusions (I) • All bulk solids are unique • Success must be based on knowing the behaviour of the material • Need for knowledge of bulk solid behaviour Conclusions (II) • Many solids handling projects have substantial problems • Reasons are linked to buyer’s procurement process and lack of technical judgement • The above means even good suppliers are often constrained to tender poor designs Means of minimising technical risk Key point 1: • Encourage the buyer to exercise close technical judgement on suitability of design Key point 2: • Contract must ensure the study of behaviour of the materials to be handled – and allow the final spec to take account of this 3017 Free flowing materials – easy (???) THE WOLFSON CENTRE for Bulk Solids Handling Technology University of Greenwich www.bulksolids.com
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz