Strabismus and Sensory Adaptations Timothy Hug, OD, FAAO Assistant Professor – Ophthalmology University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO [email protected] Strabismus n Esotropia n Congenital / Infantile n Accommodative 1 Esotropia – Congenital (Infantile) n Esotropia – Infantile Onset : age 6 – 18 months of age n n n Angle of Deviation 30^ - 40^ or greater n Helveston (1983) - found mean average of 40^ n Von Noorden (1985) - found mean of 50^ - 60^ Monitor n Spontaneous resolution in 27 % for patients with onset less than 20 weeks (Congenital Esotropia Observational Study – AJO, 2002 Jan 109-118) Refractive errors tend to be same as age matched non strabismics (+1.00 +2.00) Esotropia – Infantile n Imagine then the infantile et… n Few binocularly driven cells… n Surgical realignment…to promote binocular driven cell development n How long can we wait? Binocularity “turns on” …suddenly …between 3 -5 months of life - Reflex (Birch E., Wang J: Stereoacuity Outcomes Following Treatment if Infantile and Accommodative Esotropia; Optome Vis Sci 2009 Jun; 86 (6): 646-652) So what happens in presence of an anti binocularo-genic factor n Think similar to amblyogenic factor during the amblyogenic time period What is the binocularogenic time period? Congenital et studies…evolution from 1980s – 2005…change of thinking from age 2 years…to under 2 years, to less than 6 months from onset of deviation (malcom ing…eilen birch)…to even 2 months after onset (Ken Wright reported 100% of infantile ET operated at 4 months of age achieved motor fusion) Hubel and Weisel…strabismic cat during first 12 weeks of life (cat’s binocularogenic time period) more cells develop that are not binocularly driven Esotropia Infantile Management Surgery n n n n What is sensory adaptation to the misalignment? Timing of Intervention n Surgery by 6 – 24 months of age (CEOS) n Surgery within 2 – 4 months of misalignment Promotes best chance for development of stereopsis (24-36%) Tychsen T, Can Ophthalmologists Repair the Brain in Infantile Esotropia? Early Surgery, Stereopsis, Monofixation Syndrome and the Legacy of Marshall Parks. Journal of AAPOS, vol 9 (6), December 2005, 510-517. Wright K, High-grade Stereo Acuity After Early Surgery for Congenital Esotropia. Arch Ophthalmology vol 112, July 1994, 913-919. Birch E, Stager, D, Random Dot Stereoacuity Following Surgical Correction of Infantile Esotropia. J Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, vol 32, July 1995, 231-235. Ing M, Outcome Study of Stereopsis in Relation to Duration of Misalignment in Congenital Esotropia, J of AAPOS vol 6, February 2002, 3-8. Murray D, Changes in the Functional Binocular Status of Older Children and Adults With Previously Untreated Infantile Esotropia Following Late Surgical Realignment. J AAPOS, vol 11, April 2002, 125-130. 2 n n n Marshall Parks – facultative supression (foveal vs extrafoveal) n Or not! ARC – as described by Marshall Parks n No surgery/ delayed surgery After surgery for the misalignment…the peripheral binocular system takes over and allows development of peripheral fusion with a microtropic alignment status n Animal models suggest decay of the interocular cortical connections n n n n n Animal models suggest the length of the horizontal axon connections corresponds to the misalignement of 4 – 8 prism diopters Lack of proper binocular cortical development prevents future binocularity improvement… n If not microtrope …no fusion…no fusion potential Parks M A, Sensory Adaptations in Strabismus; Harley’s Pediatric Ophthalmology, 5th Edition; Nelson, Olistsky; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia: 137 – 142 n No chance of “restoring” something that is not there Parks, M A, The Monofixation Syndrome; Tr Am Ophth Soc, vol 67, 1969: 609-655 n Why? Tychsen, Lawrence: Can Ophthalmologists Repair the Brain in Infantile Esotropia? Early Surgery, Stereopsis, Monofixation Syndrome, and the Legacy of Marshall Parks; Journal AAPOS, Dec 2005;510-517 Infantile Esotropia Summary Esotropia – Accommodative n Age of Onset – 4 -12 months n Refractive n Angle of Deviation – Greater than 30 prism diopters n Onset 18 – 36 months1,2,3 n Surgical re-alignment goal: within 2 months of onset n Refractive Evaluation – normal for age n Amblyopia treatment n Best stereo outcome requires intervention 2 – 6 months after onset of deviation n Associated uncorrected hyperopic refractive error : +4.00 average n Angle of Deviation : 20 - 30 prism diopters at distance n Amblyopia possible – depending on time of decompensation and treatment n 50% of accommodative ET with High AC/A ratio decompensate into non accommodative Birch E., Wang J: Stereoacuity Outcomes Following Treatment if Infantile and Accommodative Esotropia; Optome Vis Sci 2009 Jun; 86 (6): 646-652 Tychsen, Lawrence: Can Ophthalmologists Repair the Brain in Infantile Esotropia? Early Surgery, Stereopsis, Monofixation Syndrome, and the Legacy of Marshall Parks; Journal AAPOS, Dec 2005;510-517 Esotropia – Accommodative n n Refractive - management Cycloplegic refraction n Prescribe full cycloplegic both eyes n Prescribe less than full plus n 1 n 2 n 3 Basic and Clinical Science – Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2008-2009 Eye Care for Infants and Children – Bruce Moore, OD Rutstein R, Update on accommodative esotropia, Optometry, 2008; 79, 422-431 n 1 n 2 n 3 Basic and Clinical Science – Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2008-2009 Eye Care for Infants and Children – Bruce Moore, OD AOA – Optometric Clinical Practice Guidelines Esotropia – Accommodative n n Refractive - management Re-evaluate esotropia after spectacle wear n One month? One week? n Orthophoria at Distance and Near n Reduced but not eliminated angle at near and distance n Reduced or Eliminated angle at distance with esotropia at near (high AC/A ratio) 3 Esotropia – Accommodative n Parent Preparation n Full time wear of spectacles n Angle may appear worse with out glasses, after adaptation n Follow up refraction every 4-6 months for 1 – 2 years (depending on age) n If controlled with spectacles – surgery not an option n n n n n n n n n Back to ET Anti Binoculaogenic factor during a critical age Similar to infantile ET delay period? What if parents don’t even bring child in? n n 79 % of patients reviewed had orthophoria or esotropia of 10 prism diopters or less 5% had decompensation Hussein M, Weakly, D, Wirazka t, Paysse E; The long term outcomes in children who are non compliant with spectacle treatment for accommodative esotropia; Journal of AAPOS, vol 19 (2), April 2015: 169-171 Fair and poor compliance with spectacle use greatly increases risk of poor sensory and motor outcomes in children with pure refractive accommodative esotropia What if parents don’t comply with glasses wear? n n Kanwar M, Sharma A; Long-term results of accommodative esotropia; Journal of AAPOS, vol 18 (3), June 2014: 261-265 n n Age 18 -36 months? Binoculogenic age? Hussein M, Weakly, D, Wirazka t, Paysse E; The long term outcomes in children who are non compliant with spectacle treatment for accommodative esotropia; Journal of AAPOS, vol 19 (2), April 2015: 169-171 Fair and poor compliance with spectacle use greatly increases risk of poor sensory and motor outcomes in children with pure refractive accommodative esotropia What if patient has (inappropriate) surgery ? n Will not develop perfect binocular function n Probable amblyopia n Once patient has amblyopia…significant decrease in binocular potential n n Mohan, K, Sharma, A: Long term results of accommodative esotropia; J AAPOS, vol 18 (3): 261-265 79 % had orthophoria or microtropia What if wrong glasses prescribed or worn? Accommodative Esotropia Summary n So imagine the 30 ET, who is 5 year old with refraction of +5.50 OU n n n n Will they be aligned in glasses? Is it too late for steropsis? n n Onset 12 -24 months Associated with uncorrected hyperopia Potential for good alignment, good stereopsis, good acuity if………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Exotropia n Exotropia n Congenital n Intermittent n Convergence Insufficiency n Divergence Excess Exotropia - Congenital n Onset 6 – 12 months of age (Harley’s Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus) n Rare – 1.0% occurrence (Cohen 1985) n Angle of 35 prism diopters (average) n Treatment: n Manage amblyopia if exists n Manage refractive conditions if outside age matched normative n Surgery within 2-6 months of onset n Similar to congenital esotropia – allows potential for restoration of binocularity (Hunter D, Long term outcome of uncomplicated infantile exotropia, J AAPOS, 2001, 5, 352-356) Exotropia - Intermittent n Onset – between 6 months and 4 years of age n Most common form of exotropia n If late enough onset from intermittent to constant, then binocular development can / will be normal… n Sensory adaptation is supression (for intermittent) n Suppression for constant n n May break down to constant deviation (unknown percentage – Nelson; Harley’s Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2005,158-162) Facultative (Parks) vs Absolute Strabismus Surgery n n Form vs Function n Pediatric vs Adult Imagine though the binocular cortical cells are developed…intact and mature ..now just “dormant” n Awaiting binocular stimulation via orthoptics or surgery, n Poof! stereopsis 5 Strabismus Surgery n n Form vs Function Pediatric n Misalignment of eyes results in compromise of binocular cortical regions (Hubel and Weisel) Strabismus Surgery n Form vs Function n Does critical window exist for this benefit? n n n Realignment of eyes may result in recovery of some binocular cortical function Studies indicate best chance within 2 – 4 months of misalignment for congenital esotropia (Tychsen T, Can Ophthalmologists Repair the Brain in Infantile Esotropia? Early Surgery, Stereopsis, Monofixation Syndrome and the Legacy of Marshall Parks. Journal of AAPOS, vol 9 (6), December 2005, 510-517. Wright K, High-grade Stereo Acuity After Early Surgery for Congenital Esotropia. Arch Ophthalmology vol 112, July 1994, 913-919. Birch E, Stager, D, Random Dot Stereoacuity Following Surgical Correction of Infantile Esotropia. J Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, vol 32, July 1995, 231-235. Ing M, Outcome Study of Stereopsis in Relation to Duration of Misalignment in Congenital Esotropia, J of AAPOS vol 6, February 2002, 3-8. Murray D, Changes in the Functional Binocular Status of Older Children and Adults With Previously Untreated Infantile Esotropia Following Late Surgical Realignment. J AAPOS, vol 11, April 2002, 125-130. Strabismus Surgery Strabismus Surgery n Form vs Function n Form vs Function n When does “no chance” exist? n Adult n Can adult strabismics ever recovery some binocular cortical function? n May depend on status of binocularity at age of “binocular maturation” n Strabismus Surgery n n n Form vs Function Strabismus Surgery n Traits evaluated Honesty n Attentiveness Humor n Communication Skills Intelligence n Competency Leadership Ability n Dependability Organizational Skills n Emotional Stability Sincerity Adult What if there is no chance of binocular function? Kushner B, The Benefits, Risks and Efficacy of Strabismus Surgery in Adults; OVS, vol91 (5), May 2014 6 Strabismus Surgery Strabismus Surgery n Overall, the strabismic faces were judged significantly more negatively, across 11 descriptive characteristics, than the non-strabismic face. Psychosocial aspects of strabismus study. Satterfield D, Keltner JL, Morrison TL Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111:1100-5 n CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial difficulties are a problem for teenagers and adults. Correction of strabismus in the older teenager or adult may offer them improvement in psychosocial functioning 7
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz