A national Nutrient Management Planning system supporting 30,000 plans per year. Pat Murphy, Teagasc Adviser Consultation Outline • • • • The Problem Meeting the Challenge Developing and Delivering the Solution Data Opportunities Nutrient Management -Why is this important Water Quality WFD Cross Compliance, Derogation Diffuse agricultural losses ~ 50% Key Component of Irish GHG production Fertiliser and Manure ~13% Irish GHGs Agricultural Output Feeding the World Sustainability Glanbia, Kerry Foods Nutrient Management – It got complicated Used to be about feeding the crop Make sure there is enough Fertiliser Cheap Perfect Storm 2007-2009 Water Framework and Nitrates Directive Fertiliser Price increase Farm Income Crisis Became a major challenge The Challenge Strict Environmental Limits Enforced with Inspection Penalties More and More Farmers needed to plan Complex Rules and Calculations Different level of planning for different farmers Data Hungry and time consuming Repetitive Statutory form of output The Solution #1 - The Spreadsheet Quick Versatile Low Cost BUT Standalone No Linkage Multiple version - No utilisation of Data Lose Control Grew bigger and bigger The Biggest Problem We lost the farmer along the way Like Accounts for Business Use for Tax Not used in the running of the business Not understood by farmers Not Communicating to Farmers Set limits - useful Did not reflect what was happening in practice County Year Enterprise Number of Samples All Counties 2014 All Farms 36,336 Trend in Soil P Index 100% 32% 30% 21% 18% Too High 21% 22% 24% 24% Ideal 28% 27% Low 27% 27% 2014 30% 25% 2013 90% 80% 23% 70% 25% 25% 60% 30% 29% 28% 50% 29% 40% 30% 28% 30% 26% 25% 26% 14% 15% 2008 2009 22% 24% 2011 14% 2007 10% 2010 20% 30% 2012 0% V Low The Problem Regulation too strict Work to rectify anomalies Farmers not following their Plans Safe Approach – Underusing Don’t understanding Cost saving Major threat to Agri-Food Industry Urgent need to improve Nutrient Management at farm level Calculating your Maximum Allowed Fertiliser N and P for the Grassland Area on your Farm Farmer Details Farmer Name Pat Murphy Date Herd No year 02/02/2014 2014 1234567m Address 1 The Tree Maximum Allowed Fertiliser N for Grassland Address 2 The Hole Organic N on grassland area 77 kg Org N/ha Address 3 The Bog Storage period 18 weeks Manure N available (organic N from all sources x availability %) Kg N allowed (see table 12, SI 610, 2010) 12 226 kg/ Ha kg/ Ha County (For Storage) Roscommon Planned Land Available (from SFP application) Restricted / Zero Fert Grass Maximum fertiliser N allowed 214 kg/ Ha Owned (Net Area) 200.00 Tillage Area (Net Area) 160.00 ha No Slurry /Fer Total Kg N fertiliser allowed adjusted grassland area 8661 kg Leased (Net Area) Rented (Net Area) 0.00 All Grassland (Net Area) 44.00 ha AEOS SRG 204.00 ha Total (1) 4 AEOS Maximum Allowed Fertiliser P for Grassland (Excl SRG) AEOS THM 200.00 ha Total (2) Total Restricted 4.00 Total (1) must equal Total (2) P reading (ppm) P Index Org P < 3.0 1 0 3.1 - 5.0 2 5.1 - 8.0 3 > 8.0 4 Planned Average Stock No's (go to Monthly Livestock no's or overwrite) Animal Org N/Hd No. DAFF N&P Statement - Not Used Org N Org P/HD 0 Average Stock Nos Jan to Dec 520 Max P (kg) Total P (kg) Rec P(kg/ha) Rec P (Kg) Grazing Silage kg P 10 31 310 24 241 0 10 21 210 15 148 0 11 110 6 0 241 0 0 630 0 0 389 0 241 10 85 65 40.0 0.0 >2 Cattle 65 0.0 10 1-2 Cattle 57 0.0 8 0-1 Cattle 24 0.0 3 P in manure produced by livestock on the holding during the storage period (kg) Mountain ewe 7 0.0 1 Organic P exported off farm and spread on tillage land Lowland ewe 13 0.0 2 Organic P imported and from on-farm other sources 0 Mountain Hogget 4 0.0 0.6 Adjustment to Home Produced and imported P for 50% availability on Index 1 & 2 90 Lowland Hogget 6 0.0 1 Less Adjusted P from Animal Manure Horse >3 50 0.0 9 P from conc fed in Horse 2yr 44 0.0 8 Tonnes fed to all livestock Calculated at Default P Tonnes Horse 1yr 36 0.0 6 Total P from Concentrate Rations - Supplier Record Tonnes Foal 25 0.0 3 Total P from Straights - Book Value or Defaults Tonnes Donkey / Pony 30 0.0 5 Less Total P from concentrates used on holding (kg) 10 Total 40.0 Additional P for Reseeding Index 1,2,3 Ha 520 kg Org P 0 kg Org N 0 kg Org P 0-50 1 0 kg Org N 0 kg Org P 51-100 2 10 0 0 0 kg Org N kg Org N 0 kg Org P kg Org P 101-150 >150 3 4 10 10 0 kg Org N 0 kg Org P 0 kg Org N 0 kg Org P kg Org N 0 520 kg Org P Total Org N & P 0 3400 Whole Farm Organic N Grassland Area Stocking Rate 16.7 77.3 kg Org N/ha kg Org N/ha Tillage Org N & P exported off farm Farm Org N & P to tillage land Transition Rule You do not require a derogation at this stocking rate kg/ha. 180 3400 Reduction T 90 20 20 KG P 100 Kg P 100 Kg P Kg P 0 (includes 28Kg P to Sp 568 0 Recommended K 2700 Exp org K 2500 Housed stock K 968 Exp K to tillage 200 0 Other ent.org K Imported Org K 0 0 Rec Fert. K 0 0 1733 Your Fertiliser Plan - Grassland Area only kg N kg P kg K 8,661 1,221 568 568 1,733 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Balance kg of fertiliser N and P under maximum* 8,661 568 Balance kg of fert. N and P under recommended* 1,221 568 Maximum Allowed kg chemical fertiliser Recommended fertiliser for current Stocking rate Chemical fertiliser options 0 Adviser Comments 17 630 0 Maximum allowable amount of fertiliser P for grassland (total kg) K (ppm) K Index Graze Sil 1c Sil 2c Total K rec The maximum Nitrogen fertiliser allowance calculated will be higher than required, use the recommended levels for crop requirements in consultation with adviser Your whole farm organic N is Recommended Tot N in Prev Year 10 0 630 2013 500 Kg Fodder Crisis Adj kg Org N Org N&P imports to Grass Index 4 Ha Max Total P (kg) 3400 Other Org N & P produced on-farm Input Other Manure 13 10 77.27 Grassland areas (ha) Graze Sil 1c Sil 2c Dairy Cow Suckler Cow Total Org N & P produced by grazing livestock Type m3/Tonnes 3400 Organic N on grassland area Tonnes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 Total Planned 0 Rate kg/Ha on the fertilised area kg 1,733 *Minus and red figures indicate nutrient over the maximum limit or over the recommended amount This summary sheet is based on information provided to Teagasc. Teagasc cannot accept responsibility for inaccurate information being supplied or for changes in planned stock numbers, land Current Fertilizer Plans Talked to Farmers Focus Groups NMP supported by Maps Tables for the regulators Maps for the farmers Lime Application Map Fertiliser Application - Map The Solution – What we Needed Complex Computational Model with flexibility to reflect potential changes in rules Scalable system – Single solution for multiple requirements Access to Data Sources to minimise effort and maximise accuracy DAFM - LPIS DAFM – Farmer Information Teagasc Client Information Laboratory Information Systems OS and other for mapping layers Management of Permissions Easy to Use Interface Linkage to Authentication and Authorisation – Under development Flexible report – To meet multiple needs Fully integrated mapping system Manure storage management and mapping NMP Online - Data Model Animal Information LPIS – Mapping and Cropping Information Client Information Soil Analysis Information Teagasc Research and the „Green Book‟ NMP Online Adviser Consultation Statutory Plan “Farmers” Plan Rollout Mandatory system for Nutrient Management Planning Approximately 700 advisers GLAS Plans 37,000 in 16 months Derogation Plans 3000 pa Launch 16 September The Data – A Platform for Learning Together Teagasc Research Agronomic – Ability of land to produce - Trends Environmental – Risk of loss of Nutrient Nutrient Load Levels of soil nutrient Feed into policy – Achieve environment objectives at minimum cost Linkage to other Geo Data and Organisations Water Framework Directive – EPA, LAs Irish Water Questions
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz