Nanoelectronics Workshop 1 17:00-18:00 on Friday, 20/01/2017 (V 123) To be handed in by 12:00 on Friday, 03/02/2017 to the General Office Note: 12.5% of Final Mark (50% from Workshops and 50% from Final Examination) Question 1. Calculate the de Broglie wavelength for the following cases: (1) A human of mass 60 kg walking at 1.0 m/s (2) A bullet of mass 10 g flying at 103 m/s (3) A free electron in a metal of speed 108 m/s (4) A Helium atom at 1 K Answer: De Broglie wavelength is defined as λ = € € € h h (Planck constant: h = 6.625 ´ 10 -34 [J×s]) = p mv (1) λ = 6.625 × 10−34€[ J ⋅ s] h = = 1.104 × 10−35 [ m] ≈ 1.1 × 10−35 [ m] mv 60 [ kg] × 1.0 [ m/s] (2) λ = 6.625 × 10−34 [ J ⋅ s] h = = 6.625 × 10−35 [ m] ≈ 6.6 × 10−35 [ m] mv 10 × 10−3 [ kg] × 10 3 [ m/s] (3) λ = 6.625 × 10−34 [ J ⋅ s] h = = 7.273 × 10−12 [ m] ≈ 7.3 × 10−12 [ m] mv 9.10938 × 10 -31 [ kg] × 10 8 [ m/s] (4) A kinetic energy of a Helium atom: E = 1 1 2 mv 2 = ( mv) , which leads mv = 2mE . At temperature 2 2m 3 T, the kinetic energy equals to k BT (Boltzmann constant: kB = €1.38065 ´ 10 -23 [kg×m 2/s 2×K]). For a € 2 Helium atom (m = 6.64 ´ 10 -27 [kg]), the de Broglie wavelength is calculated to be λ= h € = mv h = 6.625 × 10 −34 [ J⋅ s] 3 3 × 6.64 × 10 −27 [kg] × 1.38065 × 10 −23 [kg⋅ m2 /s2 ⋅ K] × 1 [K] 2m × k BT 2 −9 = 1.263 × 10 [m] ≈ 1.3 × 10 −9 [m] € Question 2. (1) In order to observe a crystal, of which atomic separation is 1 Å, estimate energy of the following waves; (a) X-ray, (b) electron-beam and (c) neutron-beam. (2) In order to investigate atomic core structures of 10-15 m, estimate energy of the following waves; (a) g-ray, (b) electron-beam and (c) proton-beam. Note you do not need to consider the theory of relativity for the above calculations. Answer: For observation, de Broglie wavelength needs to be in the same order with sample structures. (1) (a) X-ray energy is calculated to be E= = −34 [ J ⋅s] × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] = 1.988× 10−15 J hc 6.625× 10 = [] λ 10 -10 [ m] 1.988× 10−15 [ J ] 1.6022× 10−19 [ J/eV] = 1.240× 10 4 [ eV] ≈ 1.2 × 10 4 [ eV] € h 1 1 2 (b) A kinetic energy: E = mv 2 = ( mv) , which leads mv = 2mE . Hence, λ = = mv 2 2m Electron-beam energy (electron mass: 9.1094 ´ 10 -31 [kg]) is calculated to be € 2 € −34 € 2 6.625× 10 J ⋅s [ ] h −17 E= = = 2.409× 10 [J] 2mλ2 2 × 9.1094 × 10 -31 [ kg] × 10 -10 [ m] 2 ( ) ( = 2.409× 10−17 [ J ] 1.6022× 10−19 [ J/eV] ) = 1.504× 10 2 [ eV] ≈ 1.5× 10 2 [ eV] (c)€Similarly, neutron-beam energy (neutron mass: 1.6749 ´ 10 -27 [kg]) is ( ) 2 6.625× 10−34 [ J ⋅s] h2 E= = 2mλ2 2 × 1.6749 × 10 -27 [ kg] × 10 -10 [ m] ( = 1.310× 10−20 [ J ] 1.6022× 10−19 [ J/eV] (2)€(a) g-ray energy is ) 2 = 1.310× 10−20 [ J ] = 8.178× 10−2 [ eV] ≈ 8.2 × 10−2 [ eV] h . 2mE E= = −34 [ J ⋅s] × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] = 1.988× 10−10 J hc 6.625× 10 = [] λ 10 -15 [ m] 1.988× 10−10 [ J ] 1.6022× 10−19 [ J/eV] = 1.240× 10 9 [ eV] ≈ 1.2 × 10 9 [ eV] (b)€Electron-beam energy (electron mass: 9.1094 ´ 10 -31 [kg]) is calculated to be ( ) 2 6.625× 10−34 [ J ⋅s] h2 E= = 2mλ2 2 × 9.1094 × 10 -31 [ kg] × 10 -15 [ m] ( = 2.409× 10−7 [ J ] 1.6022× 10−19 [ J/eV] ) 2 = 2.409× 10−7 [ J ] = 1.504× 1012 [ eV] ≈ 1.5× 1012 [ eV] N.B. For precise calculations, the theory of relativity needs to be taken into account, resulting E€= = h 2c 2 + m 2c 4 − mc 2 λ2 (6.625 × 10 −34 [ J ⋅ s]) (10 2 ( ) × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] [ m]) -15 ( 2 − 9.1094 × 10 -31 [ kg] × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] ) 2 ( 2 ) ( 2 = 1.985 × 10−10 [ J ] = € 1.985 × 10−10 [ J ] 1.6022 × 10 −19 [ J/eV] = 1.239 × 10 9 [ eV] ≈ 1.2 × 10 9 [ eV] (c) Similar to (b), proton-beam energy (proton mass: 1.67262 ´ 10 -27 [kg]) is calculated to be 2 (6.625 × 10−34 [J⋅ s]) h2 E= = = 1.314 × 10 −10 [ J] 2mλ2 2 × 1.67262 × 10 -27 [kg] × (10 -15 [m]) 2 = 1.314 × 10 −10 [ J] = 8.20 × 10 8 [eV] ≈ 8.2 × 10 8 [eV] 1.6022 × 10 −19 [ J/eV] N.B. For precise calculations, € ) + 9.1094 × 10 -31 [ kg] × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] 4 E= h 2c 2 + m 2c 4 − mc 2 λ2 (6.625× 10 −34 = [ J ⋅s]) (10 2 ( ) × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] -15 [ m]) ( 2 − 1.67262 × 10 -27 [ kg] × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] ) 2 ( 2 = 9.876× 10−11 [ J ] = € 9.876× 10−11 [ J ] 1.6022× 10 −19 [ J/eV] 2 ) ( ) + 1.67262 × 10 -27 [ kg] × 2.9979 × 10 8 [ m/s] = 6.164× 10 8 [ eV] ≈ 6.2 × 10 8 [ eV] 4 Question 3. In a Rutherford Hydrogen model, derive quantum energy levels by assuming angular momentum of an electron is quantised as integer multiples of the Planck constant ( n; n = 1,2,3, ). Answer: € Since angular momentum of an electron is quantised as integer multiples of the Planck constant, mvr = n ( n = 1,2,3,) , where m : the electron mass, v : electron speed and r : radius of an electron orbit. The € total energy of an electron in the Rutherford Hydrogen model is obtained from E = ( kinetic energy) + ( potential energy) = , 1 1 q2 mv 2 − 2 4 πε 0 r where the potential energy is derived from the Coulomb’s law with using permittivity: e0 and the electron € charge: q. Along the radius direction, the balance of force is m v2 q2 = r 4 πε 0 r 2 (rotational motion: F = m v2 ) r By comparing the above two equations, (kinetic energy) = 2 ´ (potential energy). € 1 q2 1 ∴E = − = − mv 2 2 4 πε 0 r 2 ∴mv = € q2 4 πε 0 rv q2 Therefore, mvr = . By comparing with mvr = n , 4 πε 0 v € v= € q2 4 πε 0 n € By substituting this speed into the total energy, € 2 1 2 1 & q2 ) E = − mv = − m⋅ ( + 2 2 ' 4 πε 0 n * =− € N.B. From mvr = mq 4 32π 2ε 0 2 n 2 2 q2 4 πε 0 2 2 4 πε 0 2 n and mvr = n , r = . Here, is the Bohr radius of ~ 0.53 Å. 4 πε 0 v mq 2 mq 2 € € € €
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz