“Interstate Highway System & Evolution of the Uniform Act” IRWA International Educational Conference June 2015 Presented by Carol Myers, Senior Right-of-Way Agent Century Engineering, Inc. Acquiring Private Property for a Public Use with Federal Funds Many Federal Agencies have the Power of Eminent Domain: Housing & Urban Development Federal Aviation Administration Departments of Transportation I will focus on Transportation Projects Local / State / Interstate Roads In the 1920’s & 30’s there were discussions and plans for a Northern (Lincoln Highway) and a Southern (Lee Highway) which were to run across the US from East to West Local / State / Interstate Roads After World War II Veterans returned home Exodus to Suburbs – Levittown, Pennsylvania Baby boomers More cars Caused a need for more and better roads Local / State / Interstate Roads Established as a defense mechanism like the Autobahn in Germany To efficiently move goods, products, and troops across the United State of America, if necessary This ultimately lead to increased productivity and mobilization within the country Federal-Aid and Highway Act 1956 Established by President Eisenhower Signed June 29, 1956 Authorized 41,000 miles of Interstate Highways Created the Highway Trust Fund Started a “pay as you go” system. National commitment to complete the system. Improved Design Standards 1956 Highway Act called for uniform standards in all 48 states Design projections were initiated Planning was for a time in the future --you didn’t just plan for what was there Eventually it became a standard 20 year design life Designs specified wider traffic lanes, shoulders, and higher speeds Signing was standardized Other Factors Environmental Considerations Land use for urban highway construction Environmental impacts These issues resulted in many legislative and policy changes 1963 – Bureau of Planning & Research issues instructions regarding assessment of impacts on fish and wildlife areas 1966 – DOT Section 4(f) restrictions 1969 – National Environmental Policy Act Problems with Implementation Cost increases Allegations of corruption Haste, waste, graft, mismanagement and outrageous fraud Property owners not treated fairly “The Great Highway Robbery” By 1959 “Wild Speeches” erupted in the House of Representatives about the Interstate Highway Program that spoke of… Extravagance Inefficiency Waste Graft Etc. In 1959 Special Subcommittee Formed to Investigate Allegations in Many States Headed by John A. Blatnik (D-MN) Pennsylvania West Virginia Arizona Louisiana Oregon Wyoming South Dakota Maine Michigan Tennessee Maryland Nevada Arkansas Montana New Mexico North Dakota New Hampshire Vermont Wisconsin The Investigation Coincided with Negative Press Coverage of the Interstate Program Jack Anderson’s Article “The Great Highway Robbery” February 4, 1962 Parade & “The Great Highway Robbery” one hour episode aired on NBC David Brinkley's Journal October 1, 1962 The Blatnik Report - May 1961 The Blatnik Committee issued their report… Findings: Highway Construction Practices Right-of-Way Acquisition Disposition of Right-of-Way Improvements Relationships between Road Contractors and State Personnel Examples Real Estate Appraisals were written in pencil so that the values could be changed State Employees got credit for low balling offers to property owners One Eastern Appraiser moved out west but continued to write appraisal reports for the highway program. His father would take a photo of a property and mail it to him; so he valued properties that he never saw. Results of the Blatnik Investigation Drastic corrective measures put into effect on a national scale by the Bureau of Public Roads and American Association of State Highway Officials July 20, 1962 reorganization created a new Office of Right-of-Way and Relocation Headed by Edgar H. Swick, FHWA -Responsible for acquiring property Joseph M. O’Conner, Former FBI – Responsible for fraud, land speculation, collusion, and audits Eminent Domain The power of any sovereign government to take private property without the consent of the owner. Distinction Eminent Doman Power, or right, to take property for public use and necessity Condemnation Act of doing so Limitations Power of Eminent Domain Constitution Regulations Statutes Case Law Constitution, Statutes, United States Code and Regulations Federal Constitutional Limitations 5th Amendment to U.S. Constitution “…nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” 14th Amendment to U.S. Constitution “…nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” State Constitutional Limitations Example of a State constitution “No person’s property shall be taken damaged or destroyed for or applied to public use without adequate compensation being made…” Historical Context Prior to this there were 19 different Federal Agencies using Federal funds for land acquisition - each had their own set of rules 1970 creation of Title 49: Transportation Part 24 – Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally-Assisted Programs Commonly Referred to as the Uniform Act Signed into law by President Nixon, January 1971 Objectives of the Uniform Act Acknowledges the inequities of piecemeal legislation. Recognized the “in rem” concept of just compensation and need for additive payments based on personal consideration. No person left worse off than before displacement. Encourage tenants to become homeowners. Requires 90 day notice. Requires relocation services to all to lessen impacts. Provided “tools” to provide Decent, Safe & Sanitary “DSS” housing. Provided for reimbursement for actual/reasonable moving expenses. Must have DSS housing available w/in financial means. Established uniform land acquisition policies to protect rights. Uniform Act Title I – General Provisions Title II – Uniform Relocation Assistance Declaration of Findings and Policy Title III – Uniform Real Property Acquisition Policy Implementing Regulations 23 CFR Part 710 49 CFR Part 24 Implementing Regulations The Uniform Act are the CAKE ingredients! 23 CFR Part 710 49 CFR Part 24 The regulations are the DIRECTIONS to make the CAKE! State and Local Laws States DOT’s may have other rules and regulations, remember Federal regulation sometime establish “minimum standards”, State’s could be stricter. i.e. PennDOT’s requirement to advise owners that they are entitled up to $4,000 for property owner appraisals etc.. Legal Requirements Federal Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as amended (commonly referred to as the Uniform Act) The Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 Part 24 (49 CFR 24) Interprets and clarifies intent of Uniform Act Must comply with 49 CFR 24 if a project is to receive Federal funds 23 CFR Part 710 § 710.203 (b) (2) (ii) Relocation assistance and payments provided under the laws of the State that may exceed the requirements of 49 CFR Part 24, except for relocation assistance and payments provided to aliens not lawfully present in the United States. 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart A Uniform Act - Subparts Subpart A – General - definitions Subpart B – Real Property Acquisition – Negotiation, Appraisal and Appraisal Review Subpart C – General Relocation Requirements Subpart D – Payments for Moving and Related Expenses Subpart E – Replacement Housing Payments Subpart F – Mobile Homes Subpart G - Certification Uniform Act (cont.) The Uniform Act covers multiple disciplines: Appraisal Negotiation Relocation 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart A Key Elements – General Purpose & Definition Definitions No Double Payments Notify Property Owners Administration of Jointly Funded Projects Compliance with other Laws and Regulations Record Keeping Appeals Key Elements – General Purpose- Definitions …to promulgate rules to implement the “Uniform Act”…, in accordance with the following objectives: Owners of Real Property • Treated fairly and consistently • Expeditious acquisition by agreement • Minimize litigation • Promote public confidence in Federal Land Acquisition Uniform Act – Purpose: “In order to encourage and expedite the acquisition of real property by agreements with owners To avoid litigation To relieve congestion in the courts To promote public confidence 49 CFR 24.1 Purpose Displaced Persons, as a result of a Federal-Aid Project Treated fairly, consistently and equitably Person will not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of a project that would benefit the whole public Ensure that Agencies implement these regulations… With Efficiency Cost Effectively 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart B Key Elements – Appraisals Appraisal Appraiser Qualification Uneconomic Remnants Waiver of Appraisal Realty and Personality Tenant-Owned Improvements Opportunity to Inspect Project Influence Scope of Work for the Appraisal Assignment Key Elements – Appraisal Review Appraisal Review Defined Review Appraiser Qualifications Communication with Appraiser Review Appraiser’s Findings Review Appraiser’s Opinion of Value Establish Just Compensation 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart C Discussion Topics – Subpart C -General Relocation Requirements § 24.201 – Purpose This subpart prescribes general requirements governing the provisions of relocation payments any other relocation assistance in this part. Key Elements – Relocation Requirements Relocation notices Availability of comparable replacement dwellings Relocation planning Advisory services and coordination Eviction for cause Claims for relocation payments Aliens not lawfully present in the United States Relocation payments not considered income 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart D Key Elements – Moving & Related Expenses Residential Move Options Non-Residential Move Options Eligible Expenses Ineligible Expenses 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart E Key Elements – Replacement Housing Payments Comparability Household Income Housing Options Housing of Last Resort 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart F Key Elements – Mobile Homes Definition Definition of a Mobile Home Real or Personal Property Replacement Scenario Payment Option 49 CFR Part 24 Subpart G Key Elements – Certification Assurances, Monitoring and Correction Action Application for Certification Between FHWA Director, Office of Real Estate and the Governor of the State making application Appropriate assurances to comply with the Uniform Act List any state laws contrary to the Uniform Act Key Elements – Certification Assurances, Monitoring and Correction Action (cont.) Monitoring and Correction Action Independent Oversight Corrective Actions Action plans to comply Loss of Funding Rescind Certificate Prevent fraud, waste, and mismanagement Appendix A to Part 24 – Additional information Appendix A. The word "should" is used. Does this mean that the appendix provisions are suggestions rather than requirements? Appendix A is an integral part of the regulation. While it does not impose additional mandatory requirements, it provides important guidance and information concerning the purpose, intent and implementation of many of the provisions in the regulation. "Should," when used in the appendix to describe a mandatory requirement of the regulation, cannot alter or reduce that requirement. When used to provide guidance, it explains how a regulatory provision is to be implemented under most circumstances. Important Points to Remember !! Remember Payment can only be made for what is shown on the R/W plan (i.e. signs, septic, etc.) Site improvements must be spotted on the R/W plans: (example is structure near required line) Temporary easement is a form of R/W. If you can’t build it and/or maintain it within the “existing R/W” then some type of R/W is needed. Don’t Forget Tie Backs need right-of-way Utilities may need right-of-way – get involved early in the process; need to know their rights Railroad may need PUC involvement – very time consuming (another reason for a final right-of-way plan) Think About How many of you have purchased a home ? How long did it take to find the house ? How long did it take to get financing ? If you have children did it make a difference as to what time of year you moved ? What were your thoughts when the real estate people intruded on you at dinner, periods of grief, periods of joy ? Be Reminded The R/W staff or consultant serves general public and the property owners They are required to make sure that property owners receive all their benefits under the various laws that govern acquisition The End Questions Websites “The Great Highway Robbery” NBC David Brinkley’s Journal - http://www.IMDB.com The Uniform Act - http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real estate/publications/ Electronic Code of Federal Regulations – http://www.ecfr.gov
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz