THE TEACHING OF THINKING IN MALAYSIA ROSNANI HASHIM SUHAILAH HUSSEIN ed by: . Centre University Malaysia la Lumpur ysia Fax: 603-2056-4862 [email protected] CONTENTS ion, 2003 :entre, HUM List of Tables Acknowledgements Preface >ublication may be reproduced, stored ted, in any form or by any means, ng, recording, or otherwise, without lission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 The Teaching of Thinking: Perspectives and Issues 9 An Islamic Perspective on Thinking 9 Issues in the Teaching of Thinking 15 The Teaching of Thinking 20 The Relationship between Thinking Skills, School and Work Success 24 CHAPTER 3 Teachers' Perceptions and Practices in the Teaching of Thinking 27 Teachers' Perceptions of the Teaching of Thinking 27 Teachers' Practices in the Teaching of Thinking 29 CHAPTER 4 Research on the Teaching of Thinking in Malaysia: 35 The Ministry of Education Projects Introduction 35 Purpose of the Survey on Research in the Teaching of Thinking 37 Research Projects Conducted by the Ministry of Education 37 Ministry of Rural Development Project 40 Conclusion 41 ix xi xiii 1 Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Malaysia I Rosnani Hashim eaching. v CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 8 vi Research on the Teaching of Thinking in Malaysia: Local Educational Institutions Research Involving Pre-service and In-service Teachers Research on Critical Thinking Skills (CTS) in Secondary Education Research on CTS in the Primary School Research on Creative Thinking Skills Research on the Teaching of Thinking in Malaysia: Analysis and Conclusion Research Methods Teachers and the Teaching of Thinking Secondary Education and the Teaching of Thinking Primary Education and the Teaching of Thinking Creativity in School Challenges in the Teaching of Thinking Conclusion Teachers' 5, of Thinkin! Curriculum c of Thinkin! Teaching thE Teaching the Teachers' PI Approache Teaching St, that Promo Independent Means: Gender Academic' Course At1 School Ty~ Levels of ~ and Proce Teaching E Correlations of Teacher Results of tt Multiple Reg Content Anal Analysis of I 43 43 49 56 60 63 63 64 64 65 66 66 67 Malaysian Teachers' Perceptions and Practices in the Teaching of Thinking: Introduction and Research Methodology 69 Purpose of the Study 70 Significance of the Study 71 Definition of Terms 71 Research Method 75 Population and Sample 75 Instrumentation 76 Data Collection Procedures 80 Data Analysis 81 Malaysian Teachers' Perceptions and Practices in the Teaching of Thinking: Analysis and Results 83 Demographic Variables 83 Approaches to the Teaching of Thinking 85 The Value and Importance of Thinking Skills 86 CHAPTER 9 Malaysian 1 in the Teacl CHAPTER 10 Implications Practice Implications f Implications f Implications f Bibliography Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix 0 Name Index Subject Index ng of Thinking in onal Institutions rvice and In-service Teachers' Sense of Efficacy in the Teaching of Thinking Curriculum and School Support for the Teaching of Thinking Teaching the Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) Teaching the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Teachers' Practices of the Various Forms and Approaches to Thinking Skills Teaching Strategies and Teachers' Behaviours that Promote Thinking Independent Samples t-tests for Differences of Means: Gender Academic Qualification Course Attendance School Type Levels of Knowledge on Thinking Skills and Processes Teaching Experience Correlations between the Six Sub-scales of Teachers' Perceptions and Practices Results of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Multiple Regression Analysis Content Analysis of Open-ended Questions Analysis of Interviews 43 43 'ng Skills cation rimary School king Skills 49 56 60 ng of Thinking in Conclusion 63 63 64 g of Thinking he Teaching of Thinking 64 65 Teaching of Thinking 66 66 g of Thinking 67 rceptions and Practices king: Introduction logy 69 70 71 71 75 75 76 80 81 erceptions and Practices king: Analysis and 83 83 ing of Thinking 85 of Thinking Skills 86 CHAPTER 9 87 87 89 90 91 92 95 95 96 97 98 99 101 102 104 108 109 109 Malaysian Teachers' Perceptions and Practices in the Teaching of Thinking: Discussion 113 CHAPTER 10 Implications for Educational Theory and Practice Implications for Teacher Education Implications for the School System Implications for Theory Bibliography Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Name Index Subject Index 119 119 121 122 125 137 139 141 143 145 147 vii THE TEACHING OF THINKING IN MALAYSIA TIle development of the intellectual potential and consequently the ability to think wisely has always bc~n an impoltantgml of education. This imporont landn"kw of an educated person is again mised today as a major issue in education, after many studies have begun to reve-a! symptom.,; of a dedine in students' ability to think wisely, especially when schools began to tocus on the mastery of facts, probably in the preparation for examinations rather than on the processes of arriving at those facts. The ability to think well is critical to an individual's success in life, especially in the age of Information and Communication Technology (ICn and Globalization whereby individuals have to sieve through ma~,>ive information, which might not be necessarily relevant at such a rapid pace, and the survival of indLL<;try and natiorrdepends on competitive, knowledge capital. Should we teach thinking? Is it not a natural process and a matter of experience? After all, we were able to classif)l, analyze, generalize, deduce, induc'e, evaluate, make decision'> and solve problems without any formal instructions in thinking. It is no longer true that being able to think spontaneously would Ie-del to tlle ability to think effectively and wisely, TIlinking could be taught and good tllinking require; pmctice. Teachers in Malaysia al'e grappling with this lssue in an etlort to be forerurrners in tlle country' . drive to attain the status of an industrial country and a world centre ofeducational excellence. '!hi.,; work, theretore, examines me Malaysian educational policy regarding the teaching of tllinking and studies mat have been conducted in this aI'ea and tlleir irnplicatio.n<;, in pa.1ticular, for te--adler education. Rosnani Hashitn - Profe, s r of Social Foundations of Education at tile Centre for Education and Human Development, Intemationallslamic University Malaysia (HUM). She was fonnerly the Head of the Department of Education and its founder Dean. She obtained her doctoral degree in Social Foundation., of Education (Florida) in 1994, her master's degre in Curriculum and Instruction (Wiscon.,;in) in 1978 and her lYachelor's degree in Matllematics (Northem Illinoi ') in 1976. She wa,5 a member of the. Phi Kappa Phi and Phi Ltmbda Theta Honours' Societies, She taught mathematic; at the Mara]unior Science College before joining HUM. In addition to teaching and research, she is currently tile Assistant Editor oOumal Pendidikan Islam Goumal of Islamic Education]. She was a member of the Malaysian Council of Deans of Faculties of Education, and a consultant to the Curriculum Development Centre of the Malaysian Minisny of Education for mathematics and pre-school curriculum development. She has published bcx)ks, articles and presented papers in various journals and conferences respectively. hOtll at the local and intemationallevel.,;. Her major works are Educational Dualism in .l\1alaysia: Implications for Theoly and Practice (996) and Pengenalan kepada Ekonomi Pendidikan dari Perspektif Islam [Introduction to Economics of Education: an Islamic Perspective] in 2000. SuhaiIah Hussien - Lecturer at the Centre for Education and Human Development, International Islamic Univ rsity M::tlay ·ia. She obtained her master's degree in Social Foundations (II~n in 2000, her lYachelor's degree in Philosophy mUM) in 10/)7 and her Diploma in Education (]]Uf',r in 1998. Cun-endy she is pursuing her doctoral degree at me University of Sheffield. ISBN 983-9727-94-X 9 789839 727944
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz