Non-Tariff Barriers Malcolm Langford Senior Researcher, Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) Co-Director, Centre for Law & Social Transformation CMI & University of Bergen What are non-tariff barriers? Quantitative restrictions Other non-tariff barriers What are the main types of non-tariff barriers ? Prohibitions – Absolute or conditional Quotas – Global or Bilateral Licensing – Automatic or Non-Automatic, and usually contain some form of quota. Indirect: e.g. State trading operations, mixing regulations; minimum price, voluntary export constraint Council for Trade in Goods, 1996, Annex Prohibition CP Prohibition except under defined conditions GQ Global quota GQC Global quota allocated by country BQ Bilateral quota (i.e. anything less than a global quota) AL Automatic licensing NAL Non-automatic licensing STR MXR Mixing regulation MPR Minimum price, triggering a quantitative restriction VER "Voluntary" export restraint add the following suffixes to the above as appropriate: -S Seasonal restriction -X Export restriction Quantitative restriction made effective through state-trading operations Wikipedia Non-tariff barriers to trade can be the following: Import bans General or product-specific quotas Rules of Origin Quality conditions imposed by the importing country on the exporting countries Sanitary and phytosanitary conditions Packaging conditions Labeling conditions Product standards Complex regulatory environment Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country. Additional trade documents like Certificate of Origin, Certificate of Authenticity etc. Occupational safety and health regulation Employment law Import licenses State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership Export subsidies Fixation of a minimum import price Product classification Quota shares Foreign exchange market controls and multiplicity Inadequate infrastructure "Buy national" policy Over-valued currency Intellectual property laws (patents, copyrights) Restrictive licenses Seasonal import regimes Corrupt and/or lengthy customs procedure Notification Regime States must notify the WTO Secretariat Why are custom duties preferred over quantitative restrictions? Tariffs are more transparent Price increases with tariffs go to government but with quantitative restrictions they go to importers (‘quota rent’) Open to less corruption in the setting They do not impose absolute limits on trade What is a tariff quota? Is it a quantitative restriction? Relation to non-discrimination Non-discrimination at the core? Additional elements Quantitative restrictions (border measures?) Customs formalities (border measures, not in focus) Market access – unnecessary trade barriers Market access – harmonization of technical regulations and standards The range of domestic measures covered The issue of «attribution» The role of external actors and additional commitments Quantitative restrictions Elimination of quantitative restrictions – GATT Art. XI Equally applicable to import and export Broad range of measures Minimum import and export prices Restrictions on points of entry Non-mandatory measures covered Also indirect («de facto») The special issue of «sensitive» products Primary products – extending to fish, textiles Art. XIII: Non-discrimination, distribution Scope of the TBT Agreement Relationship to GATT, the SPS and GP Agreements (art. 1.4 and 1.5) Technical regulations (Annex) «Mandatory» Standards Voluntary, but de facto mandatory(?) National standards vs. international standards Conformity assessment procedures Processes and production methods Non-product-related, an issue of scope? Which actors? Non-governmental? Non-discrimination, art. 2.1 Note: only very recent case law! Same as GATT Arts. I and III? «Like products»? Too early to tell? «Treatment no less favourable»? The fact that GATT Art. XX is not available Preamble to the TBT Agreement Legitimate distinction Even-handedness Unnecessary obstacle, art. 2.2 Applies also to standards (Annex 3.E) and conformity assessment (art. 5.1.2) Why has it not yet been applied? Complex provision 1. Trade restrictive – how restrictive? 2. Legitimate objective – which objectives? Link to measure 3. Not more trade restrictive than necessary to achieve objective + risk of non-fulfilment Harmonization, art. 2.4 Pros and cons of harmonization Applies also to standards (Annex 3.F) and conformity assessment (art. 5.4) Which standardizing bodies? Open-ended? ISO and IEC + SPS Agreement bodies Openness and recognition Which standards State consent/majority decisions? Performance (art. 2.8) Used as basis – shifting burden of proof The presumption art. 2.5. Effectiveness and appropriateness of standard Harmonization – equivalence Particularly sensitive under the SPS Agreement Conformity assessment procedures Accept conformity assessments conducted elsewhere (art. 6) Negotiations (art. 2.7) Bilateral vs. multilateral The vulnerability of developing countries
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz