Chapter 8 INP3004/MAN3360 Dr. Steve Organizational Research Macro vs Micro Levels • Macro level – • Micro level – • Macro vs Micro research – – Sample size, cooperation, # of orgs w/ variable of interest. – Talk in terms of Organizational Theory Organizational Theories 1. Classical Theory 2. Neo-Classical Theory 3. Systems Theory 1 Classical Theory Components Classical Theory – • 1. Four Components of classical theory Differentiated Activities – • 2. Ex: People – • 3. Ex: Cooperation toward a goal – • 4. Ex: Authority – • Ex: Classical Theory Principles • Four Principles of Classical Theory that guide four components 1. Functional Principle – Division of labor (Horizontal) – 2. Scalar Principle – Chain of command – (Vertical) 3. Line/Staff Principle – • Line – • Staff – 4. Span of Control – Flat – Tall – Vertical Structure Functional vs Scalar Principles Scalar Principle • • Functional Principle Horizontal Structure 2 Neo-Classical Theory Neo-classical theory – • Differentiated activities – • People – • Cooperation toward a goal – • Authority – Neo-Classical Theory in Comparison to Bureaucracy Neo-classical theory: Systems Theory Systems Theory – 3 Systems Theory Five Parts to an Organizational System 1. Individuals – 2. Formal Organization – 3. Small Groups – 4. Status and Role – 5. Physical Setting – Systems Theory Model Output Users • Consumers • Clients • Government • Non-consumers Input Resources • Families • Banks • Environment • Material suppliers Feedback Input • Human Resources • Financial Resources • Physical Resources • Materials • Information Process • Organizational Structure • Admin Decision Making • Org policies, procedures • Production process • Org Climate Output • Products/Services • Satisfaction • Reputation • Profit/loss • Wages/Salaries • Taxes Organizational Structure Coordinating Mechanisms Organization Complexity 1. Mutual Adjustment – 2. Direct Supervision – 3. Standardization of Work Processes – 4. Standardization of Work Output – 5. Standardization of Skills & Knowledge – 4 Mintzberg’s Basic Parts to all Organizations Strategic Apex Techno Support Middle Line Support Staff Operating Core Mintzberg’s Basic Parts to all Organizations 1. Operating Core – 2. Strategic Apex – 3. Middle Line – 4. Techno Structure – 5. Support Staff – Re-organizing & Downsizing Restructure • Reorganize • Downsize Sent packing Fired Pink Slip Rightsized Canned Axed Laid off Riffed Walking papers 5 Reasons for Downsizing • Automation – • Obsolescence – • Salary Expense – Pink Slip Who gets the Axe? • Strategic Apex? – Very high salaries, could save big $$ – However, most responsibility, make big decisions • Operating core? – Lots of workers, perhaps don’t need as many – However, they make the products, low salaries don’t save that much $$ • Middle line? – Can reorganize and eliminate many middle mgr jobs and fairly high salaries • Support Staff? – Can be contracted or leased out, save on senior salaries and benefits • Techno Structure? – In house advisors/analysts can be replaced with outside consultants that charge more, but only work when you need them Before Downsizing Organizational Chart of SteveMart President ($300k) Regional Vice-President ($150k) Vice-President Pensacola ($100k) Production Manager ($50k) Sales Manager ($50k) Regional Vice-President ($150k) Vice-President Orlando ($100k) Production Manager ($50k) Sales Manager ($50k) Vice-President New York ($100k) Production Manager ($50k) Sales Manager ($50k) Vice-President Boston ($100k) Production Manager ($50k) Sales Manager ($50k) Total Salary = $1,400,000 6 After Downsizing Organizational Chart of SteveMart President ($300k) Vice-President ($150k) Sales Manager ($100k) Production Manager Pensacola ($50k) Production Manager Orlando ($50k) Production Manager New York ($50k) Production Manager Boston ($50k) New Total Salary = $650,000 Organizational Social System Social System – • Three components 1. Roles – 2. Norms – 3. Organizational Culture – • “The way we do things around here” Organization Development • Organization Development (OD) – – OD consultant like an Org Doctor • Diagnoses org’s problems • Prescribes a corrective intervention • Rechecks with follow-up evaluation 7 Organization Development Components 1. Change Agent – 2. Client – 3. Intervention – Empowerment • Giving more power and decision-making authority to employees within a context of less traditional managerial oversight Spreitzer’s (1997) four dimensions of empowerment: 1. Meaning – e.g., 2. Competence – e.g., 3. Self-determination – e.g., 4. Impact – e.g., How many psychologists does it take to change an organization? • One, but it has to want to change. • Cannot change an org if you don’t understand: 1.What can be changed 2.What outcome you expect to accomplish 3.Those things that can affect the change 8 Model of Organizational Change Intervention Activity Organizational Work Setting Social factors Organizing arrangements Physical setting Technology Individual Behavior Organizational performance Organizational Outcomes Individual development Model of Organizational Change (Robertson & Porras) • Organizational Work Setting – Four interacting components 1. Organizing Arrangements – • Ex: 2. Social Factors – • Ex: 3. Physical Setting – • Ex: 4. Technology – • Ex: Model of Organizational Change (Robertson, Roberts, & Porras) • Individual Behavior – – Ex: • Organizational Performance – • Individual Development – 9 Overcoming Organizational Resistance to Change • Due to increased ambiguity in the environment and other undesirable effects, individuals often resist change in an organization • Dirks, Cummings, & Pierce (1996) used the concept of psychological ownership to understand why people promote or resist change • • Three needs related to psychological ownership: 1. Self-enhancement 2. Self-continuity: 3. Control and efficiency: Resistance to Change • Three types of organizational change: 1. Self-initiated vs. imposed change: 2. Evolutionary vs. revolutionary change: 3. Additive vs. subtractive change: • Additional ways a consultant can ease concerns in a change situation: Organization Development Intervention Activities • Diagnostic – • Intergroup – • Education & Training – • Coaching & Counseling – • Life & Career Planning – 10 OD Intervention Depends on: Client, Type of Change, and Role of Change Agent Client Total Org Group Individual Conceptual Behavioral Type of Change Procedural Structural Role of Change Agent e e t t t i v pt i v an lys ta a pt ri t n e c a o c C fr es Ac Pr on C Change Agent Roles 1. Acceptance – • E.g., 2. Catalyst – • “E.g., 3. Confrontative – • E.g., 4. Prescriptive – • E.g., Culture Change • What is necessary for an org to change its culture (norms, beliefs)? 1. Strong leader – 2. Clear vision – 3. New work procedures – 4. Org must be open to learn – 11 Total Quality Management • Total Quality Management (TQM) or Total Quality Leadership (TQL) – OD intervention begun by W. Edwards Deming (American Physicist) – First adopted by Japanese business – Became popular in U.S. after success of Japan – Based on premise “Continuous Process Improvement” Total Quality Management How does it work? 1. Employee Involvement – How? • Sharing info – a) Develop knowledge – b) Reward org performance – c) Redistribute power – 2. Quality Control – 3. Customer Satisfaction – 4. Org Policies consistent with TQM – Re-engineering Re-engineering – 1. Identify org’s distinctive competencies – 2. Assess Core Processes – 3. Re-organize horizontally by process - 12 TQM vs. Re-engineering TQM Re-engineering • Gradual improvement • Bottom-up: • participative decisionmaking in planning TQM and execution • Results in new processes • Drastic change • Top-down: • management decides how to re-engineer • Often results in downsizing Does OD work? • Like therapy, a single dose is often not effective • Empirical findings – – – – No change about 50% of the time Negative change less than 10% of the time Positive change about 40% of the time Results similar to that of psychotherapy – with therapy many people still don’t get better, some do, very few get worse. – 13
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz