Short Term Solar Forecasting with Skycams INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ENERGY & METEOROLOGY - JUNE 2015, BOULDER, COLORADO Sam West Senior Experimental Scientist CSIRO Energy, Newcastle, Australia Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. What & Why Cloud Classification Model Cloud Presence Detection Demo Cloud Motion Vector Forecasting Demo Shade Event Forecast Performance Skycam Network Rollout What? • (Very) short-term solar forecasting • 10-30 min forecast horizon, 10s update • Inexpensive whole-sky cameras ($800) • Low cost hardware means: • Widespread deployment more practical, but • Image processing more challenging Why? • • • • Remote Area Power Systems (RAPS): save fuel, but avoid blackouts Solar Farms: avoid ramp effects, improve market operation Concentrating Solar Thermal: avoid thermal stress and component damage Distributed PV: improve grid power/load forecasts, encourage solar penetration Cloud Classification – Unprocessed Image Red-Blue Ratio (RBR) Classifier + Good performance for overcast & dark clouds - Misclassifies near sun - Misses thin and near-horizon clouds Random Forest Classifier + Sensitive to cloud edges, thin & distant clouds + Good near-sun performance Misses dark & non-textured cloud areas Combined RBR + Random Forest Classifiers • Bright red = models agree • Darker red = only one model detects cloud + The two models are complementary New Model: Final Combined Result Random Forest Supervised Classifier Training • Human manually identifies cloud and sky pixels • Train classifier using inputs for each pixel: – – – – – – Pixel Red-Green-Blue Hue-Saturation-Brightness Red Blue Ratio & Difference Sun Position Distance to Sun Pixel movement • 97% classification accuracy on 1,000,000 pixel test-set Cloud Presence Detection Demo • • • • Sudden cloud formation event Left chart: measured DNI, GHI, PV Power Red histogram bars show cloud % in concentric rings around sun Sharp increase, ~7 min before gives ample warning of shading event Cloud Motion Vector Forecasting Demo • Clear morning, intermittent afternoon, approaching cloud front • Detected 25 minutes in advance of shade event • Left chart: measured DNI, GHI, Diffuse, PV Power, and forecast Cloud Pixel Fraction Cloud Front Timing Forecasts Ramp Timing Prediction – Binary Shading Model • Evaluation of ramp-event timing forecast on 2 month dataset Misprediction Rate (%) Model Aggressive detection Conservative detection Persistence Model Detection Sky State Threshold Correct (%) 4600 96 200 61 N/A 88 False Positive (predicted sky when cloud) 2.3 0.04 5.9 False Negative (predicted cloud when sky) 2.2 39 5.6 On average, 0.04% false positive = all shade events predicted for 42 days straight, before a single ramp event is missed. More Details: S. R. West, D. Rowe, S. Sayeef, and A. Berry, “Short-term irradiance forecasting using skycams: Motivation and development,” Sol. Energy, vol. 110, pp. 188–207, Dec. 2014. Camera Network • Cover whole city with handful of cameras • 15 sites around Canberra & Newcastle for wide-area ramp and irradiance forecasting Canberra Newcastle Camera Spatial Range Verification • To plan locations for network of cameras, need camera’s spatial range • Methodology: • • • • • Two cameras with known distance Find clouds moving between cameras Calculate ground velocity from time between cameras Calculate cloud base height = f(image angular velocity, ground velocity) Verified height with ceilometer Camera Spatial Range Verification Cloud Angle vs Horizontal Distance 55 50 HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (KM) 45 40 Low cloud (cumulus): sky is visible for 10km radius around camera 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 Cirrostratus1 10-12km 20 25 30 35 40 45 ZENITH ANGLE Cirrostratus2 10-11.5km Cirrus 7-7.5km 50 55 60 Altocumulus 5-6km 65 70 75 Cumulus 2.5-3km 80 Practical Challenges: Vandals! Thanks! Sam West [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz