Carbohydrate Analysis using HPLC with PAD, FLD, Charged Aerosol Detection, and MS Detectors Bruce Bailey, Paul Ullucci, Rainer Bauder, Marc Plante, Chris Crafts, Ian Acworth Thermo Fisher Scientific, 22 Alpha Road, Chelmsford, MA, USA Overview Purpose: Sensitive applications for the analysis of simple carbohydrates, either as mono- or disaccharides, or as fairly small glycans liberated from glycoproteins typically containing 6–11 residues, are desired to enhance sampling rates. Simple, rapid and accurate methods have been developed for the analysis of carbohydrates using various chromatography and detection solutions. Methods: A sensitive pulsed amperometric detection method for the analysis of simple carbohydrates was developed and examples are shown for impurity analysis of sugars used in positron emission tomography (PET). A second chemistry for the analysis of fluorescent derivatives of glycans from glycoproteins is described. The direct analysis of simple sugars using HILIC-mode chromatography with charged aerosol detection is described. Examples showing the use of this technique for their direct determination in fruit juices are shown. Finally, orthogonal use of charged aerosol detection and MS detectors for the analysis of glycans from glycoproteins is described. Results: These methods enable the rapid separation of carbohydrate compounds at low levels and with minimal matrix interference. Introduction Carbohydrates are difficult to analyze because they have similar physical and chemical characteristics, and do not have a suitable chromophore for UV detection. Several different HPLC methods using various detector strategies (pulsed amperometric electrochemical, fluorescence following derivatization, charged aerosol detection and mass spectrometry) were developed to help study carbohydrates and examples for each approach will be presented. Although fluorescent tags improve the chromatographic resolution and detector sensitivity, they can lead to increased assay variability. Different HPLC modes can be used for carbohydrate separations, with ion exchange, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and reversed phase (RP) on porous graphite column (PGC) being the most common. HPLC enables the development of simpler chromatographic methods with direct detection using PAD or mass detectors such as ELSD, MS, and charged aerosol detection. The Thermo Scientific Dionex Corona Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD™) is an ideal detector when combined with HILIC or RP/PGC for measuring different carbohydrates. It is a masssensitive detector that can measure any non-volatile, and many semi-volatile compounds, typically with low nanogram sensitivity. Unlike ELSD, it shows high sensitivity, wide dynamic range, high precision, and more consistent inter-analyte response, independent of chemical structure. For the analysis of glycans liberated from glycoproteins, the utility of the LC-MS with charged aerosol detection platform is illustrated where the Corona CAD is used for quantitative analyses while the MS provides structural verification. The advantage of this approach over methods using fluorescent tags is discussed. Methods General considerations for Pulsed Amperometric Detection The Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 with PAD platform consisted of a basecompatible HPLC system, a Thermo Scientific Dionex Coulochem III electrochemical detector and a gold working electrode. Carbohydrates were separated using ion exchange and determined under basic conditions using a four-pulse waveform. It is essential to make sure no titanium is in the flow path as its degradation under basic conditions can lead to deterioration of column and electrode performance. Carbohydrate Analysis by HPLC-EC PAD: Pump: Autosampler: Flow: Column: Temperature: Injection volume: Mobile Phase: EC detector: EC Parameters: Range: Thermo Scientific Dionex ISO-3100 SD Thermo Scientific Dionex WPS-3000TSL Analytical Autosampler Isocratic at 0.50 mL/min. with constant He purge Thermo Scientific CarboPak: PA20, 3 x 150 mm, 6.5 µm 32 °C 50 µL partial loop 50 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH), prepared from pellets, 99.99%, semiconductor grade Coulochem™ III, Thermo Scientific Dionex model 5040 cell with Au Target: 25 µm Mylar E1 +200 mV 500 ms AD 300 ms E2 -2000 mV 10 ms E3 +600 mV 10 ms E4 -100 mV 10 ms 200 nC 2 Carbohydrate Analysis using HPLC with PAD, FLD, Charged Aerosol Detection, and MS Detectors Analysis of Glycan Derivatives with F Flow: 1.0 mL/min. Column: TSKgel® Amide-80, 4 Temperature: 35 °C Injection volume: 5 µL partial loop Mobile Phase A: 50 mM ammonium fo Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile Gradient: 65%B to 53%B in 24 equilibration from 27 Fl Detector: Ex 320 nm; Em 420 Glycan N-Glycanase (2 µL) derivative then placed overnigh formation: carbohydrates were SPE. Glycans were e water/0.1% TFA. Sam 4 °C. To dried sampl heated at 65 °C for 3 labeling reagent was 3 times) and sample reconstituted with 20 vial for injection. Direct Carbohydrate Analysis in Fruit Flow: Isocratic at 1.4 mL/m Column: Shodex™ Asahipak® N Temperature: 55 °C Post column tempera Inj. volume: 2 µL for sample, 5 µL Mobile Phase: 78% Acetonitrile, 22% Detector: Corona™ ultra RS™ Nitrogen: 35 psi Cor Sample To 1 gram juice samp Preparation: then centrifuge for 2 m Glycoprotein Analysis by parallel Cha Flow: 1.0 mL/min. Column: Thermo Scientific PG Temperature: 55 °C Post column tempera Inj. volume: 5 µL partial loop Mobile Phase: MeCN/H2O/0.1% TFA Detector: Corona ultra RS Nitrogen: 35 psi Cor Sample N-linked glycans were Preparation: recombinant N-glycan released either by tra nonreductive ammon samples was perform extraction; collecting Secondary cleanup o (collect flow-through) Results and Discuss Direct Carbohydrate Analysis with PAD Carbohydrates are commonly measured chromatography in combination with puls PAD method was developed using the Co pulse mode. The chromatogram shown in carbohydrate standards (1 ng on-column not shown) and the assay reproducibility sensitivity of this method can reach a lim column (data not shown). This method w [18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG), which is the positron emission tomography. The synth displacement and hydrolysis. A contamin 2-chloro-D-glucose (ClDG). Limits for ClD soon by the FDA. Due to the sensitivity a procedures are not required. HPAC-PAD method for determining carbohydrates (F PA20 anion exchange column using an a resolution requirements set by the USP m ydrates, either as glycoproteins typically Simple, rapid and hydrates using the analysis of simple rity analysis of sugars for the analysis of . The direct analysis d aerosol detection is irect determination in detection and MS ed. drate compounds at physical and chemical etection. Several amperometric erosol detection and and examples for ove the d to increased assay eparations, with ion and reversed phase HPLC enables the ection using PAD ction. The Thermo n ideal detector when drates. It is a massemi-volatile it shows high ent inter-analyte glycans liberated from tion platform is s while the MS ver methods using onsisted of a basem III electrochemical rated using ion lse waveform. It is dation under basic ormance. ytical Autosampler ge m, 6.5 µm om pellets, 99.99%, del 5040 cell with 0 ms Analysis of Glycan Derivatives with Fluorescence Detector Flow: 1.0 mL/min. Column: TSKgel® Amide-80, 4.6 x 150 mm, 3 µm Temperature: 35 °C Injection volume: 5 µL partial loop Mobile Phase A: 50 mM ammonium formate in water pH=4.4 Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile Gradient: 65%B to 53%B in 24 min, 0%B from 24.5 min to 26.5 min, reequilibration from 27 min to 35 min. Fl Detector: Ex 320 nm; Em 420 nm Glycan N-Glycanase (2 µL) was added to 100 µg protein in 50 µL buffer derivative then placed overnight at 37 °C. Following release from protein, formation: carbohydrates were cleaned up using Thermo Scientific Hypercarb SPE. Glycans were eluted from SPE using 40% acetonitrile/60% water/0.1% TFA. Samples were dried in a refrigerated speedvac at 4 °C. To dried samples, 20 µL 2-AA solution was added, mixed and heated at 65 °C for 3 hours. After reaching room temperature, excess labeling reagent was removed with 1 mL acetone wash (repeated 3 times) and samples were dried with a speedvac. Samples were then reconstituted with 200 µL MP A and then transferred to an autosampler vial for injection. Direct Carbohydrate Analysis in Fruit Juice with Charged Aerosol Detection Flow: Isocratic at 1.4 mL/min. Column: Shodex™ Asahipak® NH2P-50 4E 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm Temperature: 55 °C Post column temperature: 30 ºC Inj. volume: 2 µL for sample, 5 µL for standards Mobile Phase: 78% Acetonitrile, 22% Water Detector: Corona™ ultra RS™ Nitrogen: 35 psi Corona filter: Corona Sample To 1 gram juice sample, add 20 mL of 70% acetonitrile, mix, and Preparation: then centrifuge for 2 min @ 13,000 RPM Glycoprotein Analysis by parallel Charged Aerosol Detection and MS Flow: 1.0 mL/min. Column: Thermo Scientific PGC Hypercarb 4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm Temperature: 55 °C Post column temperature: 30 ºC Inj. volume: 5 µL partial loop Mobile Phase: MeCN/H2O/0.1% TFA: 4%−18% Acetonitrile gradient in 40 min Detector: Corona ultra RS Nitrogen: 35 psi Corona filter: Corona Sample N-linked glycans were released by standard procedures using Preparation: recombinant N-glycanase or endo-H. O-glycans were chemically released either by traditional reductive β-elimination (RBE),1 or by nonreductive ammonia/ammonium carbonate (NAC).2 Cleanup of samples was performed by cation-exchange SPE (solid-phase extraction; collecting flow-through) and borate evaporation. Secondary cleanup of polypeptides using a C18 SPE (collect flow-through) was performed. Results and Discussion Direct Carbohydrate Analysis with PAD Carbohydrates are commonly measured using high performance anion exchange chromatography in combination with pulsed amperometric detection (PAD). A simple PAD method was developed using the Coulochem III electrochemical detector with pulse mode. The chromatogram shown in Figure 1 illustrates replicate injections of carbohydrate standards (1 ng on-column). Good retention stability was observed (data not shown) and the assay reproducibility over 14 hours is shown in Table 1. The sensitivity of this method can reach a limit-of-detection (LOD) of less than 100 pg oncolumn (data not shown). This method was used for impurity testing of 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG), which is the most widely used radiopharmaceutical for positron emission tomography. The synthesis of FDG involves nucleophilic displacement and hydrolysis. A contaminant resulting from both processes is 2-Deoxy2-chloro-D-glucose (ClDG). Limits for ClDG have been set by USP, CMC, and EP and soon by the FDA. Due to the sensitivity and selectivity of PAD, sample preparation procedures are not required. HPAC-PAD is a well established, sensitive, and selective method for determining carbohydrates (Figure 2). The separation uses a CarboPak™ PA20 anion exchange column using an alkaline MP (50 mM NaOH) and meets the resolution requirements set by the USP method. 3 Carbohydrate Analysis using HPLC with PAD, FLD, Charged Aerosol Detection, and MS Detectors Table 1. Reproducibility statistics for 14 Glucose Fruc Height Area Height Mean 178.3 15.9 85.9 SD 1.61 0.21 0.93 RSD 0.90 1.33 1.08 FIGURE 1. Triplicate injections of carb using anion exchange chromatograph 20.0 nC 10.0 2 1 3 -5.0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 FIGURE 2. Chromatogram illustrating FDG/CLDG / mannose using anion ex 900 nC 750 625 500 375 250 125 -100 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Glycan Analysis with Fluorescence De The analysis of glycans using fluorescen suitable derivative. In this case the highly derivative was prepared according to the technical note illustrating a similar fluores FIGURE 3. Carbohydrate separation o HPLC with fluorescence detection. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 7.5 10 12.5 Table 1. Reproducibility statistics for 14 hour run (50 ng standard) Glucose 2-aminobenzamide (AB) has been publis proposed structure assignments shown in analysis. Lactose Height Area Height Area Height Area Height Area 178.3 15.9 85.9 8.7 44.6 5.1 95.2 12.9 SD 1.61 0.21 0.93 0.19 0.51 0.11 0.90 0.21 RSD 0.90 1.33 1.08 2.15 1.15 2.23 0.95 1.59 Analysis of Carbohydrates in Fruit Jui The analysis of simple carbohydrates wa in HILIC mode (Figure 4). This column, u separation while offering good stability an speed of separation of the various carboh the water content and elevating the colum eluted in less than 16 minutes and the LO 5 µL injection), which is much better than was applied to the measurement of carbo Other food sugars in honey and different successfully analyzed. The method can b in a variety of food products. This techniq that only possess weak chromophores w sample preparation FIGURE 1. Triplicate injections of carbohydrate standards (1 ng on-column) using anion exchange chromatography and PAD detection. 20.0 nC 10.0 FIGURE 4. Carbohydrate measuremen aerosol detection. 2 1 3 osol Detection m, 5 µm Sucrose Mean to 26.5 min, re- ein in 50 µL buffer ase from protein, Scientific Hypercarb % acetonitrile/60% gerated speedvac at as added, mixed and m temperature, excess one wash (repeated vac. Samples were then ferred to an autosampler Fructose -5.0 0.00 25.0 min 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 FIGURE 2. Chromatogram illustrating the separation and detection of 10 µg/mL FDG/CLDG / mannose using anion exchange chromatography and PAD detection. tonitrile, mix, and 900 20.0 15.0 10.0 nC 750 and MS pA 5.0 625 0.0 500 m, 5 µm 375 adient in 40 min ocedures using s were chemically ation (RBE),1 or by NAC).2 Cleanup of PE (solid-phase evaporation. 8 SPE nion exchange n (PAD). A simple cal detector with ate injections of was observed (data Table 1. The ss than 100 pg ong of 2-deoxy-2harmaceutical for eophilic ocesses is 2-DeoxyCMC, and EP and mple preparation sitive, and selective uses a CarboPak™ ) and meets the -4.0 0.0 250 125 -100 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 FIGURE 5. Direct analysis of carbohyd min 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 100 Glycan Analysis with Fluorescence Detection The analysis of glycans using fluorescence detection requires the formation of a suitable derivative. In this case the highly fluorescent 2-anthranilic acid (2-AA) derivative was prepared according to the technique described by Anumula.3 A technical note illustrating a similar fluorescence method for glycan profiling using 1 2 3 4 5 pA 80 60 FIGURE 3. Carbohydrate separation of 2-AA derivatives using HILIC-mode HPLC with fluorescence detection. 40 FLD, Ex=320, Ex=320, Em=420 FLD, Em=420 20 5 4 3 2 1 66 -5 0.0 55 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 44 Glycoprotein Analysis with Charged Ae 33 22 1 1 0 0 The Corona CAD and MS use the same v techniques can also be used orthogonally the glycans and quantitative data, while M is shown in Figure 6 for the analysis of gly powerful approach to glycan identification 90% 90% 10% 10% 7.5 7.5 10 10 12.5 12.5 15 15min 17.5 17.5 20 20 4 Carbohydrate Analysis using HPLC with PAD, FLD, Charged Aerosol Detection, and MS Detectors 22.5 22.5 25 25 ) Lactose Height Area 95.2 12.9 0.90 0.21 0.95 1.59 FIGURE 6. Fetuin: reductive β-elimina MS QTof (+ mode) using a Hypercarb P detection and MS. 2-aminobenzamide (AB) has been published by Thermo Fisher Scientific.4 The proposed structure assignments shown in Figure 3 were based on accurate mass analysis. Analysis of Carbohydrates in Fruit Juices using Charged Aerosol Detection The analysis of simple carbohydrates was performed using a polymeric amino column in HILIC mode (Figure 4). This column, unlike silica-based columns, provides adequate separation while offering good stability and low column bleed. Improved selectivity and speed of separation of the various carbohydrate species was achieved by decreasing the water content and elevating the column temperature. Simple carbohydrates were eluted in less than 16 minutes and the LOD was ~5 ng on-column (1 µg/mL using a 5 µL injection), which is much better than those achieved by RI or ELSD. This method was applied to the measurement of carbohydrates in fruit juice samples (Figure 5). Other food sugars in honey and different corn syrups (data not shown) have also been successfully analyzed. The method can be used to easily determine sugar abundance in a variety of food products. This technique is a good example of detecting analytes that only possess weak chromophores with very simple analytical conditions and sample preparation ng on-column) 4.50 5.00 ection of 10 µg/mL y and PAD detection. Gly pA 0 20.0 15.0 5.0 0.0 -4.0 0.0 min 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 FIGURE 5. Direct analysis of carbohydrates in various fruit juice samples. min 9.0 10.0 100 formation of a acid (2-AA) numula.3 A profiling using 1 2 3 4 5 OJ Apple Cranberry Grape 200ug/ml CAD_1 CAD_1 CAD_1 CAD_1 CAD_1 pA 80 40 FLD, Ex=320, Em=420 20 5 4 3 2 1 -5 0.0 min 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Glycoprotein Analysis with Charged Aerosol and MS detection The Corona CAD and MS use the same volatile mobile phase. The two analytical techniques can also be used orthogonally with the Corona CAD providing the profile of the glycans and quantitative data, while MS is able to provide structural information. This is shown in Figure 6 for the analysis of glycans from fetuin. The combined technique is a powerful approach to glycan identification and quantification. 22.5 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 • The UltiMate™ 3000 with PAD system o direct determination of simple carbohyd an RSD of less than 2% (height) over a method allows for detection of 100 pg s • The use of the derivatizing agent 2AA a sensitivity and selectivity for the measur • The direct HILIC-charged aerosol detec accurately and precisely determine sim samples were easily processed by weig mobile phase compatible solutions. Dire separation provided adequate separatio achieved using the Corona CAD. Using can be performed using mobile phases detectors. This helps to simplify analysi enables confirmation of structures. • The N- and O-linked glycans derived fro glycoproteins can be profiled and chara aerosol detection-MS. For glycoprotein some of the pitfalls of PAD (high salt), a impurities, ion-pairing agents). These is offline-MS/MS analysis of unknowns. Th instrument and thus amenable for use i QC operations. References 60 HILIC-mode 8.00 Conclusions 10.0 8.0 Glycopeptide #1 200ug/ml 25.0 4.00 0 AH08MAR0704 100 % FIGURE 4. Carbohydrate measurement using HILIC-mode HPLC with charged aerosol detection. min % 25 5 Carbohydrate Analysis using HPLC with PAD, FLD, Charged Aerosol Detection, and MS Detectors 1. Carlson D.M. Structures and immunoc from pig submaxillary mucins. J. Biol. C 2. Huang, Y.; Mechref, Y.; Novotny, M.V. glycans for subsequent analysis throug electrophoresis. Anal Chem. 2001, 73, 3. Anumula KR., Advances in fluorescenc liquid chromatographic analysis of glyc 350(1),1-23. 4. Technical Note 109: Analysis of 2-Amin HPLC with Fluorescence Detection, LP Scientific. http://www.dionex.com/en-u Aminobenzamide-Glycans-09Sept201 Acknowledgements Thermo Scientific would like to thank Dr. Andrew J.S. H providing the data on LC-MS analysis of glycans. Dr Ha fluorescence. TSKtel is a registered trademark of Tosoh Corp. Shode registered trademark of Showa Denko KK. All other tra subsidiaries. This information is not intended to encour the intellectual property rights of others. FIGURE 6. Fetuin: reductive β-elimination: LC/Charged Aerosol Detection/ MS QTof (+ mode) using a Hypercarb PGC column with parallel charged aerosol detection and MS. Scientific.4 The on accurate mass rosol Detection ymeric amino column mns, provides adequate proved selectivity and hieved by decreasing carbohydrates were n (1 µg/mL using a r ELSD. This method amples (Figure 5). hown) have also been mine sugar abundance of detecting analytes al conditions and % 900 uL to CAD 0 AH08MAR0704 100 TOF MS ES+ TIC 5.91e3 Glycopeptide #1 % PLC with charged 0 •de-N glycosylate •β-elimination •desalt (evap. and AG-50) •C18 cleanup •LC/CAD/MS Glycopeptide #2 0 100 uL to MS 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 36.00 Time Conclusions min 16.0 18.0 20.0 uice samples. CAD_1 CAD_1 CAD_1 CAD_1 CAD_1 • The UltiMate™ 3000 with PAD system offers a routine and robust approach for the direct determination of simple carbohydrates. The reproducibility of this method shows an RSD of less than 2% (height) over a 14 hour period. The mass sensitivity of this method allows for detection of 100 pg simple carbohydrates. • The use of the derivatizing agent 2AA and fluorescence detection offers excellent sensitivity and selectivity for the measurement of glycans from gycoproteins. • The direct HILIC-charged aerosol detection approach offers a simple way to both accurately and precisely determine simple carbohydrates. Fruit juices and food samples were easily processed by weighing the sample and diluting the material in mobile phase compatible solutions. Direct injection of samples using HILIC mode separation provided adequate separation of sugars with low ng detection levels achieved using the Corona CAD. Using this platform, useful product characterizations can be performed using mobile phases which are compatible with nebulizer based detectors. This helps to simplify analysis and the use of MS as an orthogonal detector enables confirmation of structures. • The N- and O-linked glycans derived from recombinant proteins and other glycoproteins can be profiled and characterized using PGC RP-HPLC-Charged aerosol detection-MS. For glycoprotein analysis, detection by the Corona CAD avoids some of the pitfalls of PAD (high salt), and fluorescence (O-glycan peeling, fluorescent impurities, ion-pairing agents). These issues can hamper LC-MS and downstream offline-MS/MS analysis of unknowns. The Corona CAD is a simple and robust instrument and thus amenable for use in routine development and even manufacturing QC operations. References min 16.0 18.0 20.0 n he two analytical providing the profile of uctural information. This ombined technique is a 1. Carlson D.M. Structures and immunochemical properties of oligosaccharides isolated from pig submaxillary mucins. J. Biol. Chem. 1968, 243, 616−626. 2. Huang, Y.; Mechref, Y.; Novotny, M.V. Microscale nonreductive release of O-linked glycans for subsequent analysis through MALDI mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis. Anal Chem. 2001, 73, 6063–6069. 3. Anumula KR., Advances in fluorescence derivatization methods for high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of glycoprotein carbohydrates. Anal Biochem. 2006, 350(1),1-23. 4. Technical Note 109: Analysis of 2-Aminobenzamide (AB) Labeled Glycans Using HPLC with Fluorescence Detection, LPN2898, 2011. Dionex, Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific. http://www.dionex.com/en-us/webdocs/111143-TN109-HPLC-2Aminobenzamide-Glycans-09Sept2011-LPN2898.pdf (January 30, 2012). Acknowledgements Thermo Scientific would like to thank Dr. Andrew J.S. Hanneman and Jason C. Rouse at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals for providing the data on LC-MS analysis of glycans. Dr Hanneman also prepared and analyzed the glycans with fluorescence. TSKtel is a registered trademark of Tosoh Corp. Shodex is a trademark of Showa Denko KK. Asahipak is a registered trademark of Showa Denko KK. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others. PO70026_E 2/12/S 6 Carbohydrate Analysis using HPLC with PAD, FLD, Charged Aerosol Detection, and MS Detectors www.thermoscientific.com/dionex Thermo Scientific Dionex products are designed, developed, and manufactured under an ISO 9001 Quality System. TSKtel is a registered trademark of Tosoh Corp. Shodex is a trademark of Showa Denko KK. Asahipak is a registered trademark of Showa Denko KK. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and its subsidiaries. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all countries. Please consult your local sales representative for details. U.S./Canada Brazil Austria Benelux (847) 295 7500 (55) 11 3731 5140 (43) 1 616 51 25 (31) 20 683 9768 (32) 3 353 42 94 Denmark France Germany Ireland Italy (45) 36 36 90 90 (33) 1 39 30 01 10 (49) 6126 991 0 (353) 1 644 0064 (39) 02 51 62 1267 Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom Australia China (46) 8 473 3380 (41) 62 205 9966 (44) 1276 691722 (61) 2 9420 5233 (852) 2428 3282 India Japan Korea Singapore Taiwan (91) 22 2764 2735 (81) 6 6885 1213 (82) 2 2653 2580 (65) 6289 1190 (886) 2 8751 6655 PN70026_E 03/12S
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz