Public Land and Resources Law Review
Volume 12
Public Land Law Review Case Name Index
Case Name Index Public Land & Resources Law Review
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
Part of the Law Commons
Recommended Citation
12 Pub. Land L. Rev. 103 (1991)
This Index is brought to you for free and open access by The Scholarly Forum @ Montana Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Land and
Resources Law Review by an authorized administrator of The Scholarly Forum @ Montana Law.
PUBLIC LAND LAW REVIEW
CASE NAME INDEX
I
The cases in this index are arranged by Plaintiff's name only.
VOLUME: PAGE
CASE NAME
9:1
Amax Exploration v. Mosher ..................................................
8:185
American Motorcyclist Assoc. v. W att ..........................................
1:39; 6:167; 8:33; 11:53, 76
.................
Arizona v. California ......................
8:33
Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe ...........................................
6:49
Arkla Exploration Co. v. W att ................................................
8:165; 11:185, 202
Badoni v. Higginson .................................................
1:I
Baldwin v. Montana Fish and Wildlife Comm'n ..................................
11:92
Bean Lake ......................................................
9:145
Block, M innesota ex rel. Alexandef v ...........................................
8:129
Bob M arshall Alliance v. W att ................................................
8:115
.............
Bonelli Cattle Co. v. Arizona ...............
11:204
Bowen v. Roy ...............................................................
11:60
Brendale v. Confederated Tribes ...............................................
2:1
Brewer O il Co. v. U .S ........................................................
1:1, 83
,.................
Buford v. Houtz ...................
10:143
Burke v. Southern Pacific .....................................................
6:65
Butte City W ater Co. v. Baker ................................................
8:129
Cabinet Mountains W ilderness v. Peterson ......................................
4:51; 10:91
California v. Block ........................................................
10:131
California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co ...............................
4:114
California v. U .S .............................................................
6:49
California v. W att ...........................................................
: ....................................
6:65; 9:145
Cam field v. U .S ......................
9:145
Cappaert v. U .S .............................................................
7:1; 10:169; 11:20
Carson-Truckee Water Conservancy Dist. v. Clark .......................
7:117; 11:68
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia ...............................................
2:1; 6:119; 11:64
Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma .........................................
11:32, 35
Christy v. Hodel ............................................................
11:64
Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma .................................................
6:183
Citizens Against Toxic Sprays v. Berglund ......................................
3:156; 4:89
City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr ............................................
8:143
City of Angoon v. Hodel .....................................................
4:89
City of El Paso v. Reynolds ...................................................
2:109
City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma ........................................
8:143
City of Tenkakee Springs v. Block .............................................
7:79
Click, State ex rel Andrus v ....................................................
1:39; 4:157; 8:33
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. U.S .......................
11:62
Colville Confederated Tribes v. W alton .........................................
7:79
Commowealth Edison Co. v. Montana ..........................................
: ...........
1:103; 4:170; 6:119
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. Namen ........
7:1
Conner v. A ndrus ............................................................
8:129
Conner v. Burford ...........................................................
8:115
...............
Corvalis Sand Co., Oregon ex rel. State Land Board v ..........
11:69
Creek N ation v. U.S . ........................................................
... 11:185, 186
Crow v. G ullet ........................................................
9:81
Crow Tribe v'. M ontana ......................................................
8:129
Daly v. Volpe .....................................................
3:133
Day v. A rmstrong ...........................................................
PUBLIC LAND LAW REVIEW
[Vol. 12
7:1
Defenders of Wildlife v. Andrus
4:157
District Court, State ex. rel McDonald v.
931
Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.
451
Dunlop v. Bachowski
3:133
Elder v. Delcour
797
El Paso v. Reynolds
11:207
Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith
Environmental Defense Fund v. Andrus
2:109; 7 79
First Iowa Hydro-Electric v. Federal Power Comm.
1:1
Fort Leavenwoth R.R. v. Lowe
8:129; 11:155
Foundation for North American Sheep v. U.S.D.A.
11:184
Frank v. State
10:140
Fremont v. United States
7:1; 10:169; 1120
Friends of Endangered Species v. Jantzen
8:81, 177; 11:105
Gait v. State
1134
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
2:1233; 3:156; 4:89; 7:97; 11 24
Geer v. Connecticut
2:1
Genessee Chief v. Fitzhugh
3:133
Gibbons v. Ogden
3:133
Gibson v. Kelly
7:79; 9 59
Granite Rock Co. v. California Coastal Comm.
833
Greely, State ex. rel. v.
7 79
Gulf Oil v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Comm.
1124
Hammer v. Dagenhart
11-39
Heckler v. Chaney
3:133
Herrin v. Southerland
1:112; 3:194
Herrin v. Sieben
779
Hibbard, State of Oregon ex. rel. Cox v.
11 12
Hill v. TVA
7:145
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining and Reclamation Assoc.
3:156; 4:89: 7:97
Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter
2:123; 4:89
Hughes v. Oklahoma
2:1; 6:1: 8:81
Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois
3:51; 5:55; 6:6
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadda
2:138
Indiana v. Andrus
5:31
Juanita Bay Valley Community v. Kirkland
1:83
Jerke v. Department of State
5:147; 10:21; 11:68
Johnson v. McIntosh
4:134
Just v. Marinette County
4:157
Kake Village v. Egan
10:131
Kerr-McGee v. Hodel
9:81
Kerr McGee Corp. v. Navajo Tribe
:1; 2:123; 6:65; 7:79; 9:59
Kleppe v. New Mexico
3:1; 8:129; 10:152
Kleppe v. Sierra Club
2:1
Knight v. U.S. Land Assoc.
2:109
Kohl v. U.S.
6:103
Lang v. Robinson
1:1; 1:112; 3:194; 5:171
Leo Sheep Co. v. U.S.
2:109
Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. Briggs
1:1, 83
Light v. U.S.
11:181, 206
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetary Protective Association
6:203
Marks v. Whitney
9:31
Marias River Syndicate v. Big West Oil Co.
2:1; 3:133
Martin v. Waddell
2:1
Massachussetts v. New York
9:81
Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
1991]
CASE INDEX
105
M ontana v. Blackfeet Tribe .......................................... 7:135; 9:81; 11:56
M ontana v. U.S ................................................ 2:1; 5:147; 6:119; 11:59
Montana Coalition for Stream Access v. Curran ................ 6:1, 203; 8:81, 177; 11:105
Montana Coalition for Stream Access v. Hildreth .................. 6:1; 8:81; 8:177; 11:105
Montana Power Commission v. Public Service Commission ........................ 6:195
M ontana Power Co. v. Rochester .............................................. 4:170
11:69
M orton v. M ancuri ..........................................................
4:29
Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Andrus ...............................
Muckelshoot Indian Tribe v. Trans-Canada ................................... 6:119
M ugler v. Kansas .................................................. 4:134
Nance v. Environmental Protection Agency .................................. 7:117
8:143
National Audubon Society v. Hodel ......................... ..............
........... 6:1, 203; 8:81
National Audubon Society v. Superior Court ............
National League of Cities v. Usery .................................2:138; 11:34
3:1
N RDC v. Berklund .........................................................
7:21
N RDC v. Callaway .................... ".................
NRDC v. Hodel ................................................... 8:185
National Wildlife Federation (NWF) v. Burford ................................ 11:156
NWF v. Coleman ...................................................... 11:20
NWF v. Hodel ................................................... 7:1; 10:157
NWF v. National Park Service ............................................. 10:157
6:141
N W F v. U .S.F.S .......... ..................................................
N W F v. W att ............................................ ................ 5:55; 6:65
3:133
New Mexico v. Red River Valley Co. .........................................
6:65
........................................
New Orleans v. U.S .........
Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Adsit ......................................... 3:179; 4:157
Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Hodel .......................................... 7:117
Northern Pacific v. Soderberg ................................................ 10:143
Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assoc. v. Peterson ................. 8:165; 11:181, 203
.............. 7:1, 117
North Slope Burrough v. Andrus ....................... ......
2:57
Oklahoma v. Texas .................... ................ ....................
Oregon ex rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand Co. .......................... 8:115
Oregon Natural Resource Council v. Marsh ................................... 8:129
Pacific Legal Foundation v. W att ....................................... 3:51; 5:55; 6:65
Palila v. Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources ................... 7:1; 10:157, 169
8:81
Paradise Rainbows v. Fish and Game Comm .....................................
8:129
Park County Resource Council v. U.S.D.A .....................................
3:1
Parker v. U.S ......................................................
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon ..................................... 2:138; 4:134; 7:135
People v. Emmert ................................................. 3:133
People v. W oody ............................................................ 11:184
11:138
..............................................
People of Togiak v. U.S..
Perkins v. Bergland ................................................ 8:185
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc ................................................. 3:156; 4:89
Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan ....................................... 2:1; 3:133; 6:1, 65; 7:79
3:1
Port of Astoria v. Hodel ....................... ............................
11:11
Portland Audubon Society v. Lujan ......................... ...... ...........
9:31
Proctor v. W erk .............................................................
6:119
Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of Tacoma .......................................
Pyramid Lake Paiute tribe of Indians v. Morton ............................. 7:117
In re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River .............................. 11:53
Roaring Springs Association v. Andrus .............................. ......... 1:83; 4:29
8:81
Robinson v. A riyoshi .........................................................
Rochester Gas and Electric Corp. v. Federal Power Comm ........................ 2:109
Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Assoc. v. Andrus ................. .......... 3:1; 9:59
SOCATS v. Clark ........................................................... 6:183
PUBLIC LAND LAW REVIEW
Save Our Ecosystems v. Clark
Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Sherbert v. Verner
Shively v. Bowlby
Sierra Club v. Block
Sierra Club v. Clark
Sierra Club v. Hathaway
Sierra Club v. Peterson
Sierra Club v. Sigler
Simonson v. McDonald
South Dakota v. Andrus
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. Watson
Sporhase v. Nebraska
State v. Arthur
State v. Black Brothers
State v. McCoy
Stop H-3 Association v. Dole
Stryker's Bay v. Karlan
Teterud v. Burns
Topaz Beryllium v. U.S.
TVA v. Hill
Thomas v. Peterson.
Trout Unlimited v. Morton
Trustees for Alaska v. Hodel
U.S. v. Adair
U.S. v. Anderson
U.S. v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
U.S. v. Aranson
U.S. v. Butler
U.S. v. California
U.S. v. Coleman
U.S. v. Curtis-Nevada Mines, Inc.
U.S. v. Dann
U.S. v. Darby
U.S. v. E.C. Knight Co.
U.S. v. Fryberg
U.S. v. Gemmill
U.S. v. Gratiot
U.S. v. Holt State Bank
U.S. v. Isbell Construction Co.
U.S. v. Jesse
U.S. v. Kagama
U.S. v. Lee
U.S. v. Light
U.S. v. Lyndsey
U.S. v. Means
U.S. v. Mitchell (Mitchell 1)
U.S. v. Mitchell (Mitchell 2)
U.S. v. Midwest Oil
U.S. v. New Mexico
U.S. v. Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation Co.
U.S. v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
U.S. v. Sioux Nation
U.S. v. Union Oil Co. of California
U.S. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
U.S. v. Washington
[Vol. 12
6:183
11:184, 201
11:183, 200
1:103; 2:1
9:127; 11:101
7:1; 10:157, 169; 11:20, 28, 32, 38
3:1
3:1
6:183
1:112
2:57; 3:1
8:143
4:89; 6:1; 7:97
2:123
1:112
2:123
11:20
5:31
11:184
2:57
2:123; 7:1; 10:157, 166; 11:20, 40, 46
6:141; 8:129; 11:20
8:129
8:143
6:167
11:62
3:133
6:119
11:24
5:55; 10:141
2:57
1:1
5:183
2:138
11:24
5:100
5:183
6:65
2:1; 4:170
5:171
11:85
11:69
11:191
6:65
9:145
11:181, 190
11:71
11:71
5:55; 6:65
1:1; 4:114; 5:1; 6:167; 9:127
4:114
7:21
11:70
5:171
1:1
6:119
1991]
CASE INDEX
107
. 5:100
U .S. v. W hite ...............................................................
3:1; 9:59
...................
U tah v. A ndrus ........................................
3:179
Utah International Inc. v. Intake W ater Co ......................................
7:79; 9:59
Ventura County v. Gulf Oil Co ..............................................
1:1; 5:31
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC ...............................
6:183
Village of False Pass v. W att .................................................
2:138
Virginia Surface Mining and Reclamation Assoc. v. Andrus .......................
6:119
In re W ashington Power Co...................................................
4:170
W ashington v. Confederated Colville Tribes .....................................
5:171; 10:132
W att v. W estern Nuclear, Inc ............................................
2:1
........
Weber v. Harbor Commissioners .................................
4:51; 5:1; 6:141; 10:47, 70
West Virginia Division of Izaak Walton v. Butz ..................
4:157
W hite Mountain Apache Tribe v. Arizona ......................................
9:81
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker ......................................
7:145
W hitney Benefits, Inc. v. U.S ..................................................
11:153
W hitney v. California ........................................................
.................
2:138
W ickard v. Filburn ........................................
6:65
W ilcox v. Jackson ...........................................................
5"147
: ................................
W illiam s v. Lee ............................
11:185, 202
.............
W ilson v. Block ............................................
1:39; 4:114, 157; 6:167; 11:53, 55
W inters v. U.S . .......................................
k....................
6:119
W isconsin v. Baker .....................................
11:183
W isconsin v. Yoder ..........................................................
............
..... 7:117; 11:68
W orcester v. Georgia ................................
5:171
Zimmermnan v. Brunson ......................................................