John Lea`s Cholera with Reference to Geological Theory, April 1850

58
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Fertility of Soils, by the Decomposition of the Different Classes of
Rocks. Philadelphia; Abraham Small, 1817.
Koch T. Mapping the Miasma: Air, health, and place in
early medical mapping. Cartogr Perspect 2005;52:4–7.
Seaman V. Inquiry into the cause of the prevalence of
yellow fever in New York. Medical Repository 1798;1:
303–23.
Koch T. Cartographies of Disease: Maps, Mapping, and
Medicine. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 2005.
Seaman V. A Dissertation on the Mineral Waters of the
Saratoga. . . New York: Samuel Campbell, 1793.
Haviland A. The Geographical Distribution of Disease in Great
Britain and Wales. London: Swann Sonneschen and Co.,
1882.
Koch T. Disease Maps: Epidemics on the Ground. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Sunderland J. Extracts from Appendix (A) to the
Report of the General Board of Health on the
Epidemic Cholera of 1848 & 1849. Int J Epidemiol
2002;31:900–07.
Haviland A. The Geographical Distribution of Health Disease
and Dropsy, Cancer, in Females and Phthisis in Females, in
England and Wales. London: Smith Elder, 1869.
Sedgwick WT. Principles of Sanitary Science and the Public
Health with Special Reference to the Causation and
Prevention of Infectious Disease. New York: Macmillan,
1911.
Hamilton H. The fly as a carrier of typhoid: An inquiry
into the part playbed by the common housefly in the
recent epidemic of typhoid fever in Chicago. JAMA
1903;103:576–83.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Frost WH. The water supply of Williamson, West Virginia,
and its relation to an epidemic of typhoid fever. Hygienic
Laboratory Bull 1910;62:55–90.
Koch T. Disease Maps: Epidemics on the Ground. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Frost WH. Epidemiologic studies of acute anterior poliomyelitis. Hygienic Lab Bull 1912;90:9–105.
Pasternak J. Official indifference: Uranium mines reveal
environmental crisis for Navajos. IRE Journal 2007;30:
30–33.
Garland CF, Garland FC. Do sunlight and vitamin D
reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol
1980;9:227–31.
Mohr SB. A brief history of vitamin D and cancer prevention. Ann Epidemiol 2009;19:79–83.
Brodur P. Currents of Death: Power Lines, Computer
Terminals, and the Attempt to Cover Up Their Threat to Your
Health. NY: Simon and Schuster, 1989.
Wertheimer N, Leeper E. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. J Epidemiol 1979;109:
273–84.
Koch T. Journalism for the Twenty-first Century. Westport, CT
and London, UK: Praeger Books, 2001, pp. 150–54.
Blot WJ, Harrington J, Toedo A, Hoover RH, Fraumeni JF.
Lung cancer after employment in shipyards during World
War II. N Engl J Med 1978;299:620–24.
Lee-Feldstein A. Arsenic and respiratory cancer in
humans: follow-up of copper smelter employees in
Montana. J Natl Cancer Inst 1983;80:601–09.
Akst J. Like father, like son. The Scientist 2012;26:
20–21.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association
ß The Author 2013; all rights reserved.
International Journal of Epidemiology 2013;42:58–61
doi:10.1093/ije/dys242
Commentary: John Lea’s Cholera with
Reference to Geological Theory, April 1850
Brian Altonen
Department of Community Health, Portland State University, NY, USA
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Accepted
18 December 2012
In 1850, John Lea (1782–1862) published his Cholera,
with Reference to the Geological Theory1 in Cincinnati,
Ohio. Unlike other interpretations of cholera produced
around this time, John Lea’s interpretation focused on
rocks and soil instead of animalcules, fungi or poisons. Lea relied upon a 50-year-old theory stating calcareous rocks were the cause for diseases due to their
alkalinity. It was Lea’s experiences with the 1830 epidemic in Tennessee that led him to develop this
theory when a severe Asiatic cholera epidemic struck
his town, preceded and followed by its milder form
cholera morbus. Earlier versions of this geological
theory were posed for such diseases as ‘black-vomit’
in 18002,3 (for which an opposite relationship was
developed), yellow fever between 1800 and 18404
and cholera after the first pandemic.5
John Lea’s ability to differentiate Asiatic cholera from
cholera morbus was not overly successful, for he was
COMMENTARY: JOHN LEA’S CHOLERA
not a physician. He was a notary public with a wife and
several children.6 He moved to Cincinnati, Ohio,
around 1840,7 and during his spare time was a gardener and horticulturalist8 who kept a weather journal9–12 and applied meteorological skills to improving
the products of his garden and fruit-bearing trees. It
was the observations Lea made about local topography
and water behaviour that brought him to his conclusions about the geological theory. When we read his
pamphlet we can tell Lea’s conclusions were very subjective and speculative. For example, he blamed the
cases suffered by newly arrived immigrants on their
inability to adapt to the new climate. For Bostonians
and New Yorkers, he blamed it on the ‘sub-acid’ or
alkaline oranges found in their diet which served as
an ‘exciting cause’, turning cholera morbus into its
more malignant form. Reading the world news, he
blamed the epidemics in Egypt on the low rainfall
which forced citizens to rely upon cholera-ridden Nile
River water. For those residing next to the Little Miami
River in Ohio, the highly alkaline calcium-rich fossil
beds were to blame.
To prevent ‘the virus of cholera’, Lea noted accurately the role water quality plays in disease prevention. He favoured the capture of rainwater with
barrels and cisterns, a very common practice locally.
But he also noted the value of ‘river water’ supplied
by iron pipes and steam power to town and city settings, ‘soft water’ provided to some towns by aqueducts and mineral-free water flowing through
sandstone and alluvial river beds. He also noted that
certain diets made you healthier, drinking tea prevented Asiatic cholera like it did in China, and
when rainwater wasn’t accessible, wine, spirits and
beer were healthy substitutes.13 Throughout all of
these discussions, geology was used to explain why
cholera occurred and how it could be prevented,
claiming ‘arenaceous’ or sandy soil and alluvium
were the safest soils to reside on.
In April 1850, Lea’s pamphlet was published just a
few weeks before the annual meeting of the American
Medical Association [AMA] in Cincinnati.14 During
this meeting, the Committee for Practical Medicine
and Epidemics displayed a map depicting the first
cases of cholera in the Philadelphia area (Figure 1).
Their map contrasted with that of Lea, and provided
no reasons for the disease whereas Lea’s map clearly
depicted cases and deaths in relation to houses and
the type of water that was used.
In August and September of 1850, portions of Lea’s
work were reprinted in the Eclectic Medical Journal15,16
produced by an alternative medical profession popular
to the region.17 This was months before the public
would hear about the AMA’s accomplishments and
coverage of this disease published in it Transactions.11
Lea’s article again appeared in February 1851 in the
Western Lancet.18 Two months later, Dr Theodore Bell
published an article summarizing the success of doctors with this epidemic.19 At the end of his article he
59
Figure 1 Philadelphia, 1849, 27 Asiatic Cholera Cases.
Source: Trans Am M Ass, Phila. 1850; 3, Fold-out map insert,
p. 124
referred to Lea as a member of ‘the Wernerian or
aqueous school’, a personal comment comparing
him to a late 18th-century geologist, hydrologist and
speculative miner.20 A few months later, news of
William Farr’s work on the elevation theory for cholera was published, with most of his findings contradicting Lea’s claims.21,22 As the credibility of Lea’s
work rapidly diminished, Cincinnatian physician
Thomas Carroll composed a summary of the local epidemic for the Western Lancet in 1854, in which he
stated only the following about Lea’s geological
theory: ‘[n]either sandy deserts nor mountain heights
could stop its progress’.23
In 1855, John Snow’s second edition of On the Mode
of Communication of Cholera was published.24 In this
book, Snow stated the following about Lea’s theory:
Mr John Lea, of Cincinnati, has advanced what he
calls a geological theory of cholera. He supposed
that the cholera-poison, which he believes to exist
in the air about the sick, requires the existence of
calcareous or magnesium salts in the drinking
water to give it effect. This view is not consistent
with what we know of cholera, but there are certain circumstances related by Mr Lea which deserve attention . . . The connection which Mr Lea
has observed between cholera and the water is
highly interesting, although it probably admits of
a very different explanation from the one he has
given.
The accomplishments of John Snow and William
Farr ultimately led to the popularization of the ‘zymotic theory’ for diseases like cholera during the late
1850s. This philosophy was embraced by nearly all
physicians during the decades to come.25–28 In 1884,
the vibrio identified by Filippo Pacini (1812–83)29 was
ultimately proven to be the cause for Asiatic cholera
60
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
by Robert Koch (1843–1910).30,31 Four years later, the
relationship between the vibrio and alkalinity was
documented by Japanese microbiologist Kitasato
Shibasaburō32 but by then Lea’s Geological Theory was
long forgotten. To date, Vibrio cholerae is the only
known human pathogen that can thrive in an environment with a pH above 8.0,33–35 demonstrating the
value of Lea’s discovery. In recent years, the changing
relationships between microorganisms and our environment make the study of the geology of disease an
important spatial global health care issue.36–40
13
14
15
16
17
18
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lea J. Cholera, with Reference to the Geological Theory.
A Proximate Cause – A Law by Which it is Governed –
A Prophylactic. Cincinnati, OH: Wright, Ferris & Co.,
1850; Reprinted in Int J Epidemiol 2013;42:30–42.
Harris W. Facts relative to the Black-Vomit, Dysentery,
&c., as the occurred in Mifflin County, Pennsylvania
during the hot Weather of 1797, 1798, and 1799, and
to the Efficacy of Strata of Calcareous Earth (Carbonate
of Lime) in counteracting the exciting Causes of those
Distempers. From a letter of Dr William Harris to Dr
Mitchill, dated 24 June 1800. Med Reposit, NY 1801;4:
105–08.
Mitchill SL. Outlines of Medical Geography: being an
Inquiry how far Calcareous Soils and Strata counteract
the septic Exhalations which occasion Distempers of a
febrile or pestilential Type. In a letter from Dr Mitchill
to James Haworth dated 4 November 1797. Med Reposit
NY 1799;2:39–46.
Fergusson W. Dr. Fergusson on Yellow Fever. To the
Editor of the Medico-chirurgical Review. Med-Chir Rev,
London 1840;33:297–307.
Boubée M. Bull Soc Geol de France 1832:6:540.
In Oldham T. Address delivered at the Anniversary
Meeting, February 20, 1850. J Geol Soc, Dublin 1850;4:
117–238.
US Census. Family search; https://familysearch.org/pal:/
MM9.1.1/MXQ4-VWW (29 October 2012, date last
accessed). John Lea in household of John Lea,
Cincinnati, Ward 2, Hamilton, Ohio, United States;
citing dwelling 608, family 794, NARA microfilm publication M432, roll 687, 1850.
US Census. Family search. https://familysearch.org/pal:/
MM9.1.1/XHRR-WQB (29 October 2012, date last
accessed). John Lea, Cincinnati Ward 2, Hamilton,
Ohio; citing p. 83, NARA microfilm publication M704,
roll 398, 1840.
The Magazine of Horticulture, Botany, and All Useful
Discoveries.Cincinnati Horticultural Society: First Fall
Exhibition,
1843.
Cincinnati
Horticultural
Society
1843;9:461–67.
Lea J. Meteorological table. Western Horticultural Review
(October). 1850;1:104.
Lea J. Meteorological table. Western Horticultural Review
(November). 1850;1:152.
Lea J. Meteorological table. Western Horticultural Review
(December). 1850;1:200.
Lea J. Meteorological table. Western Horticultural Review
(January) 1851;1:248.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
‘‘The Laws of Cholera’’ Reprinted (by Permission) from ‘‘The
Times’’. London: Charles Knight, 1854.
Warren JC. American Medical Association. Minutes of the
Third Annual Meeting of the American Medical
Association held in the City of Cincinnati, May 1850.
Trans Am M Ass, Phila 3 1850;11.
Lea J. Geological Theory of Cholera. Eclectic Medical Journal
(Cincinnati) 1850;2:366–73.
Lea J. Geological Theory of Cholera. Eclectic Medical Journal
(Cincinnati) 1850;2:401–08.
Haller JS. A Profile in Alternative Medicine: The Eclectic
Medical College of Cincinnati, 1845-1942. Kent OH: Kent
State University Press, 1999.
Lea J. Cholera – The Geological Theory. Western Lancet
(Cincinnati) 1851;12:89–97.
Bell TS. Epidemic Influences, and the duties of the
Medical Profession in relation to them. West J M & S,
Louisville 1851;7:277–343.
Werner AG. Memoirs of Eminent Persons. New Monthly
Magazine 1817;8:132–35.
Farr W. Influence of Elevation on the Fatality of Cholera.
Quart J Statist Soc, London 1852;15:155–83.
The Registrar-General’s Report on the Mortality of
Cholera in England, 1848-49. London, 1852. Brit & For
Med-Chir Rev 1852;19:49–56.
Carroll T. Observations on the Asiatic Cholera during the
years of 1849 and 1850. Western Lancet 1854;15:321–54.
Snow J. On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. 2nd edn.
London: John Churchill, 1855.
Farr W. Letter from William Farr to the Registrar General,
on the Causes of Death in England, 1850. Annual Report
of the Registrar-General for England and Wales 1854;13:
129–36.
Ward TO. The Effect of Malaria Upon the Diffusion of
Disease. London Med Gaz 1849;9:193–96.
Nichols J. The Water Theory of Cholera. (Letter to the
Editor). Lancet 1868;2:400.
Tingley WH. On the Action of Climatic Causes in the
production of Disease, especially of the Zymotic nature.
Read before the St. Louis Medical Society, 22 December
1855. St. Louis M & S J 1856;14:385–401.
Osservazioni Microscopische e Deduzioni Patologiche Sul
Cholera Asiatico. Memoria del dott Filippo Pacini.
(Firenze: tipografia di Federigo Bencini; 1854.) http://
books.google.com/books?id¼F9s_AAAAcAAJ&printsec¼
frontcover&dq¼inauthor:Filippoþinauthor:Pacini&hl¼en
&sa¼X&ei¼1JCQUImqEcfH0QHxyYCgDw&ved¼0CDIQ6
AEwAA#v¼onepage&q&f¼false (14 January 2013, date
last accessed).
Leidy J. On Parasitic Life. American Medical Association:
Minutes of the Third Annual Meeting of the American
Medical Association held in the City of Cincinnati, May,
1850. Trans Am M Ass; Phila 3 1850;69.
Sketch of Robert Koch. Popular Science Monthly 1889;36:
259–63.
Kitasato
S,
Nachtrag
Z.
Abhandlung
über
Widerstandsfähigkeit der Cholerabacterien gegen das
Eintrocknen und gegen die Hitze Zeit. Hyg Bd VI 1889,
p. 11. [v. Jahrg IV 1888, p. 264].
Oliver JC, Colter LS. The Test for Comma Bacillus. Cincin
Lancet-Clinic 1892;29:583–84.
Meade M, Emch M. Medical Geography, 3rd edn. New York:
Guilford Press, 2000.
Engelkirk PG, Duben-Engelkirk J. Controlling the Growth
of Microbes (in Vitro). In Engelkirk PG, Duben-Engelkirk J
COMMENTARY: JOHN LEA’S CHOLERA
36
37
(eds). Burton‘s Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Ninth edn.
Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
Mekalanos JJ. The evolution of Vibrio cholerae as a
pathogen. In Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK (eds).
Epidemiological and Molecular Aspects on Cholera. New
York: Springer, 2011, pp. 97–114.
Ryan J, Glarum J. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Containing
and Preventing Biological Threats. Burlington MA:
Butterworth-Heinemann Homeland Security Series, 2008.
38
39
40
61
Drlica K, Perlin D. Antibiotic Resistance: Understanding and
Responding to an Emerging Crisis. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education, 2001.
Holtz C. Global Health Care: Issues and Policies. London:
Jones and Bartlett, 2008.
Davenhall WF, Kinabrew C. GIS in Health and Human
Services. In Kresse W, Danko DM (eds). Springer Handbook
of Geographic Information. London: Springer, 2012,
pp. 911–37.