Helaba Research FX FOCUS 18 October 2016 British pound AUTHOR Christian Apelt, CFA phone: +49 69/91 32-47 26 [email protected] EDITOR: Claudia Windt PUBLISHER: Dr. Gertrud R. Traud Chief Economist/ Head of Research Helaba Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen MAIN TOWER Neue Mainzer Str. 52-58 60311 Frankfurt am Main phone: +49 69/91 32-20 24 fax: +49 69/91 32-22 44 The US dollar was able to gain against the euro. A few emerging country and commodity currencies appreciated even more strongly. The biggest loser by far was the British pound. Concerns over the Brexit have most recently put the pound under considerable pressure, as anxieties about a non-amicable solution have grown. However, the negotiation process is only just beginning, which means that every statement must be taken with a grain of salt. The economic fallout of the Brexit vote has been surprisingly limited – so far. By now, the pound is very favourable valued. That is why the pound, in spite of all the uncertainties, should stabilize at the current level, especially against the euro. Helaba Currency Forecasts Performance on a month-over-month basis % vs. euro compared to the previous month (from 09/16 to 10/17/16) US dollar 1,4 Japanese yen -0,1 British pound -5,0 Swiss franc 0,5 Canadian dollar 2,1 Australian dollar 3,3 New Zealand dollar -0,5 Swedish krona -1,4 Norwegian krone 3,0 Czech koruna 0,0 Polish zloty -0,3 Hungarian forint 0,4 5,0 This publication was very carefully researched and prepared. However, it contains analyses and forecasts regarding current and future market conditions that are for informational purposes only. The data is based on sources that we consider reliable, though we cannot assume any responsibility for the sources being accurate, complete, and up-to-date. All statements in this publication are for informational purposes. They must not be taken as an offer or recommendation for investment decisions. Russian ruble Turkish new lira -2,3 South Korean won 0,9 Chinese yuan 0,5 Indian rupee 2,2 South African rand 1,6 3,3 Brazilian real 5,3 Mexican peso ■ Core currencies ■ Rest of G10 ■ Currencies of emerging markets Sources: Bloomberg, Helaba Research HELABA RESEARCH · 18 OCTOBER 2016 · © HELABA 1 FX FOCUS BRITISH POUND GBP: Quiet after the storm The Brexit is getting serious! Some may have believed that the outcome of the British EU referendum in June might be ignored, or that at least there would be a quick and amicable solution. At the party congress of the Conservatives, Prime Minister May announced that the government would submit the application to leave by March 2017, sending the pound into a downward slide. At the same time, she showed herself not very ready to compromise, and similarly implacable tones followed from EU representatives. Fear of a “hard” Brexit is in the air, which would no doubt entail considerable negative economic consequences for the UK. The euro-pound exchange rate climbed to over 0.90, a 4 % gain since the party congress. And Britain’s currency lost even more ground against the US dollar – leaving aside still the “flash crash” of October 7, when the pound plunged by 6 % within two minutes. Is a further plunge of the British pound now inevitable? The first wave of depreciation following the Brexit vote is still comparatively comprehensible based on interest rate differences and economic data. The economic sentiment indicators took a clearly negative turn. The Bank of England reacted: in addition to a cut in the key rate, the central bank launched a bond-buying program, and the yield differences moved to the disadvantage of the British currency. A surprisingly solid fundamental environment By contrast, the new wave of depreciation involving the pound can hardly be substantiated with fundamental factors. The economic slump – something we also expected – has so far not materialized, not to mention a global Brexit recession. For the third quarter, the signs point for the British economy to a somewhat slower but still solid growth, something that is putting our forecast under scrutiny, at least as far as 2016 is concerned. A few sentiment indicators have recovered noticeably, which means that from the economic side there is no major threat in the near future. The result of this could be that the Bank of England will postpone the further rate cut it has hinted at into the coming year. And the yield differences vis-à-vis the euro have also improved form the perspective of the pound, even if a marginally higher risk premium on British bonds is slightly distorting the value. The most recent pound weakness is thus above all one thing: fear-driven. Yield spreads tended to support the pound recently British economy remarkably robust . . . so far GBP % yoy % pound Sources: Macrobond, Helaba Research Party congress tactics or conviction? Index Sources: Macrobond, Helaba Research Statements made on party congresses should in principle be taken with a certain grain of salt – and that applies, incidentally, also to statements by the head of Scotland’s government, Sturgeon, regarding Scottish independence. That Prime Minister May chose a rather tough tone at the congress of a party, the majority of whose voters were in favour of the Brexit, is hardly surprising. What is remarkable is that liberal economic voices are increasingly being pushed into the background in the Thatcher party. The role of the state is getting more weight, and foreign workers are cast in a critical light. Brexit proponents who are in favour of a “radical free-market” policy beyond the EU are hardly pleased. The fundamental trend of British economic policy under May thus raises questions, not only with respect to the Brexit. HELABA RESEARCH · 18 OCTOBER 2016 · © HELABA 2 FX FOCUS BRITISH POUND Back and forth in Brexit negotiations at least until 2018 Some politicians from the EU or its member states have also embraced a rather tough bargaining position. For tactical reasons, alone, the EU should deter other potential candidates interested in leaving with a line that shows little willingness to compromise. As it is, intensive negotiations are on the agenda in the EU – let us recall only certain bailouts in the wake of the debt crisis. On the other hand, some national governments will act toward the British in a rather accommodating way, simply for reasons of self-interest. If the British activate the exit paragraph 50 of the EU treaties in March of 2017 and the Brexit takes effect after two years of negotiations, a consensual compromise will hardly emerge before the middle of 2018. Until then, the British pound will presumably be pulled back and forth between the hope of an amicable solution and concern over the failure of the negotiations. A political calming down is not unlikely in the near future, especially since the British pound is clearly oversold from a technical point of view. Moreover, large speculative positions against the pound exist at the futures exchanges – often a contra indicator. Above all, however, the pound sterling is very favourable valued at the current level, as real exchange rate indexes indicate. In view of the significant current account deficit as well the political risks, a certain undervaluation is surely called for. Overall, however, the further depreciation potential is thus certainly limited. Pound sterling strongly undervalued Pound-dollar rate burdened by monetary policy Index USD Sources: Macrobond, Helaba/Research Sources: Macrobond, Helaba Research % points Still, the pound is still far from being truly attractive. Britain’s economy is likely to weaken still noticeably. Uncertainty should grow with the increasing discussion about the consequences of the Brexit, which means that there is a tendency for major investments to be postponed. Declining prices for commercial real estate could already be an indication in this direction. Higher import prices resulting from the depreciation of the pound will likely damp consumption, which will not be necessarily compensated for by higher exports. The Bank of England will presumably pay attention to the growth data and ignore the temporary rise in inflation. A further interest rate cut in the coming year should come as no surprise. However, to a considerable degree the exchange rates seem to have already anticipated the worsening in the interest rate differential from the perspective of the pound that would go along with this. Stabilization in the pound sterling The political uncertainties regarding the Brexit will presumably continue largely during the two-year negotiation phase, until the compromise we expect will be arrived at. With the political ups and downs, the euro-pound rate should hover around 0.90 for the time being. Entirely possible temporary rises above this level should trigger swift countermovements. The parity in the europound exchange rate that was briefly recorded during the global financial crisis in 2008/09 should not be a yardstick, since the euro zone is currently in a very different situation. When it comes to the US dollar, the pound still has some room on the downside because of the Fed’s interest rate hikes. However, the pound-dollar exchange rates should also settle down just below 1.20. HELABA RESEARCH · 18 OCTOBER 2016 · © HELABA 3 FX FOCUS BRITISH POUND Helaba Currency Forecasts Performance year to date 1 month vs. Euro US dollar current* Q4/2016 Forecast horizon at end ... Q1/2017 Q2/2017 Q3/2017 (vs. Euro, %) -1,3 1,4 1,10 1,05 1,05 1,05 1,05 Japanese yen 14,3 -0,1 114 110 115 115 115 British pound -18,4 -5,0 0,90 0,90 0,90 0,90 0,85 Swiss franc 0,0 0,5 1,09 1,08 1,10 1,10 1,10 Canadian dollar 4,1 2,1 1,44 1,39 1,39 1,40 1,39 Australian dollar 3,4 3,3 1,44 1,50 1,50 1,54 1,50 Swedish krona -5,4 -1,4 9,69 9,50 9,20 9,00 8,90 Norwegian krone 6,8 3,0 9,00 9,00 8,90 8,90 8,70 Chinese yuan -4,3 0,5 7,41 7,14 7,19 7,14 7,14 15,7 -1,5 104 105 110 110 110 Swiss franc 1,3 -0,9 0,99 1,03 1,05 1,05 1,05 Canadian dollar 5,4 0,6 1,31 1,32 1,32 1,33 1,32 Swedish krona -4,2 -2,8 8,81 9,05 8,76 8,57 8,48 vs. US-Dollar Japanese yen (vs. USD, %) Norwegian krone 8,1 1,6 8,18 8,57 8,48 8,48 8,29 Chinese yuan -3,6 -0,9 6,74 1,57 6,80 6,85 6,80 6,80 -17,3 -6,3 1,22 1,17 1,17 1,17 1,24 4,7 1,8 0,76 0,70 0,70 0,68 0,70 US-Dollar vs. … British pound Australian dollar (vs. USD, %) *17.10.2016 Sources: Bloomberg, Helaba Research HELABA RESEARCH · 18 OCTOBER 2016 · © HELABA 4 Darstellung möglicher Interessenkonflikte bei der Weitergabe von Anlageempfehlungen („Finanzanalysen“) gem. § 34b WpHG und MAR Diese Publikation wurde weitergeleitet von der Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen. Dieses Institut unterliegt der Aufsicht der Europäischen Zentralbank und der Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Diese Publikation wurde erstmals am 18.10.2016 um 11:14 Uhr weitergegeben. Sie gibt die von dritten erstellten Anlageempfehlungen inhaltlich unverändert weiter. Die Helaba hat vor deren Weitergabe durch den Ersteller keinen Zugang zu diesen Publikationen. Bezogen auf Finanzinstrumente oder Emittenten, die direkt oder indirekt Gegenstand der jeweils weitergegebenen Anlageempfehlung sind, können folgende Interessenkonflikte der Helaba bzw. eines mit ihr verbundenen Unternehmens auftreten: Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale 1. Die Helaba und mit ihr verbundene Unternehmen betreuen an einem Markt Finanzinstrumente, die selbst oder deren Emittenten Gegenstand der Anlageempfehlung sind, durch das Einstellen von Kauf- oder Verkaufsaufträgen. Hausadresse Friedrichstraße 74 40217 Düsseldorf Betroffene Werte: B+S Banksysteme AG Postadresse Postfach 10 28 23 40019 Düsseldorf Villeroy & Boch AG Telefon 02 11 / 82 6 - 05 Telefax 02 11 / 82 6 - 31 84 2. Die Helaba und mit ihr verbundene Unternehmen haben einen Handelsbestand in Aktien der folgenden Gesellschaft: Internet www.helaba.de Betroffene Werte: Bankleitzahl 300 500 00 Sanofi S.A. SWIFT-Adresse WELA DE DD Uniper SE UST.-Id.-Nr. DE 114 104 159 3. Die Helaba und mit ihr verbundene Unternehmen handeln regelmäßig in Aktien der folgenden Gesellschaften. Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main, HRA 29821 Jena, HRA 102181 Betroffene Werte: Adecco Group AG adidas AG Airbus SE Allianz SE alstria office REIT-AG Atos SE Aurubis AG AXA S.A. Axel Springer SE Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA) Banco Santander S.A. Sitz Frankfurt am Main Erfurt Evonik Industries AG Fielmann AG freenet AG Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA GEA Group AG Prudential Financial Inc. Rheinmetall AG Royal Dutch Shell PLC Gerresheimer AG GN Store Nord AS Hannover Rück SE RWE AG SAP SE Schaeffler AG Schlumberger N.V. (Schlumberger Ltd.) Shire PLC Siemens AG HeidelbergCement AG Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. Société Générale S.A. Software AG -2- BASF SE Bayer AG Bayerische Motoren Werke AG Beiersdorf AG Brenntag AG Cisco Systems Inc. Colgate-Palmolive Co. Comcast Corp. Commerzbank AG Continental AG Covestro AG Daimler AG Danaher Corp. Danone S.A. Deutsche Bank AG Deutsche Börse AG Deutsche Lufthansa AG Deutsche Post AG Deutsche Telekom AG Deutsche Wohnen AG Dialog Semiconductor PLC Dollar General Corp. [New] Dürr AG Engie S.A. E.ON SE Henkel AG & Co. KGaA HOCHTIEF AG STADA Arzneimittel AG Starbucks Corp. HUGO BOSS AG Infineon Technologies AG Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. KION GROUP AG Koninklijke Philips N.V. K+S Aktiengesellschaft L'Air Liquide - Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Geor LANXESS AG Linde AG LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE MAN SE Merck KGaA METRO AG MTU Aero Engines AG Münchener RückversicherungsGesellschaft AG in München Murray and Roberts Holdings Ltd. Nestlé S.A. Omnicom Group Inc. STMicroelectronics N.V. STRATEC Biomedical AG Südzucker AG Swisscom AG Swiss Re AG Symrise AG Orange S.A. Vonovia SE OSRAM Licht AG PayPal Holdings Inc. Wirecard AG WPP PLC Zurich Insurance Group AG ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE Mit freundlichen Grüßen Landesbank Hessen - Thüringen Compliance-Stelle TAG Immobilien AG Talanx AG Telecom Italia S.p.A. The Priceline Group Inc. thyssenkrupp AG Total S.A. Unilever N.V. United Internet AG Uralkali PAO Valéo S.A. va-Q-tec AG Volkswagen AG -3- Finanzgruppe Weitergabe von Anlageempfehlungen nach Art. 8 DVO1 hier: Offenlegung von Informationen und möglicher Interessenkonflikte Diese Publikation wurde Ihnen am 15.06.2017 überreicht von der Die Sparkasse unterliegt der Aufsicht der Europäischen Zentralbank und der Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Die Sparkasse gibt diese Publikation unverändert weiter. Sie hatte keinen Zugang zu der Publikation, bevor sie diese vom Ersteller oder einer anderen weitergebenden Stelle erhalten hat. 1 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2016/958 im Hinblick auf die technischen Regulierungsstandards für die technischen Modalitäten für die objektive Darstellung von Anlageempfehlungen oder anderen Informationen mit Empfehlungen oder Vorschlägen zu Anlagestrategien sowie für die Offenlegung bestimmter Interessen oder Anzeichen für Interessenkonflikte.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz