Inferences of normal fault structure and

The silent aftermath of Tibetan
normal fault earthquakes
Isabelle Ryder, Roland Bürgmann, Eric
Fielding, Jianbao Sun
Coseismic InSAR
Funning et al. 2007
Yutian
2008 (7.2)
Manyi
1997 (7.6)
Nima-Gaize
2008 (6.4)
Zhongba
2008 (6.6)
Kokoxili
2001 (7.8)
Damxung
2008 (6.3)
Ryder et al. 2009
Lasserre et al. 2005
Postseismic InSAR
Manyi
1997 (7.6)
Yutian
2008 (7.2)
Nima-Gaize
2008 (6.4)
Zhongba
2008 (6.6)
Kokoxili
2001 (7.8)
Damxung
2008 (6.3)
YUTIAN
Yutian earthquake
• 20 March 2008
• M 7.2
• West-dipping normal fault
forming half-graben
• Rupture beneath Guliya
ice cap
AL
15
OS T 5
T514
ALOS
t
Envisa
T155
Coseismic InSAR
ALOS
ALOS
Postseismic time series (Envisat)
coseismic
ALOS-Envisat coseismic inversion
N
Poly3D (Thomas, 1993)
S
Envisat
ALOS
InSAR
Model
Residual
Envisat postseismic inversion
COSEISMIC:
POSTSEISMIC:
InSAR
Model
Residual
ZHONGBA
InSAR data
25 August 2008
M 6.6
2005
2008
?
?
DAMXUNG
Damxung InSAR
Damxung slip inversions
COSEISMIC:
POSTSEISMIC:
NIMA-GAIZE
Nima-Gaize earthquake
• 9 January 2008
• M 6.4 mainshock
• M 5.9 aftershock
1 week later
• Normal fault source
mechanisms
Qiangtang terrane
ALOS
T509
a
uo f
ei-C
p
n
a
Rig
Gaize
back Siling Co
thrus
t
z
uture
s
g
on
Bang
Lhasa terrane
one
ult
Nima InSAR
Similarity of spatial
deformation fields
associated with coand post-seismic
phases
coseismic
Æ afterslip occurred
on both fault planes
Æ initial slip and
afterslip
approximately
coincident
postseismic
ALOS-Envisat joint inversion
• 2 faults required to explain LOS
displacement field
• Peak slip on mainshock fault
plane: 1.04 m at 6-8 km depth
• Peak slip on aftershock fault
plane: 67 cm at 2-4 km depth
Ryder et al. JGR 2009
Moment release function
Total moment
release ~10%
of coseismic
value
Ryder et al. JGR 2009
lower crustal
viscosity
Constraints on lower crustal viscosity
NIMA:
viscoelastic model prediction
elastic
Maxwell
Poly3D (Pollitz, 1992)
Ryder et al. JGR 2009
Constraints on lower crustal viscosity
YUTIAN:
elastic
Maxwell
Poly3D (Pollitz, 1992)
Final time series image:
Burgers rheology modelling
elastic
Burgers
Poly3D (Pollitz, 1992)
Uplift of graben?
Summary (i)
Afterslip signal observed for all recent normal
faulting events
Varying spatial relationship between initial slip
and afterslip:
Approx. same area slips in both
Afterslip concentrated at ends of rupture
Slip on subsidiary faults
Afterslip releases moment up to 10% of
coseismic value
Can afterslip on these faults be used as
analogues for e.g. larger, strike-slip earthquakes?
Summary (ii)
≥1x1019
Pa s
7x1018 Pa s (Maxwell)
3x1018 Pa s | 3x1019 Pa s (Burgers)
>3x1017 Pa s
?
?
?