PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
Date: ________________
Time: ______________ Location: _________________________
Student’s Name: _______________________________________________________________
Evaluator: _________________________________ Phone # ___________________________
Directions: Please fill out after the performance and give to the student. Rate the “All
Presentations” section of the presentation viewed, then select the type of presentation being
viewed and complete the rating the presentation.
Note: All applicable categories should be rated. For example, a student might be an actor
(performance) and a director (coached activity) of a presentation and should be rated for both
aspects of the presentation.
All Presentations (irrespective of type)
Purpose: Was the presentation appropriate for the intended
audience and purpose? Did it have the potential to achieve
the desired outcome?
Preparation: Was the presentation well organized and
ready to go on time? All equipment, actors, etc. ready?
Preparation: Do you feel the presenter put in at least 30
hours of preparatory work for the performance?
Quality: Do you feel the presentation was a quality
product worthy of being a Culminating Project?
1
Low
2
3
Fair
4
5
High
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
_____________________________________________________________________________
Select the ONE most relevant category below for review
Coached Activity/Performance (may necessitate an informal interview of a few
participants or having the mentor rate this portion of the evaluation)
Organization: Was the student “coach” well organized
throughout the preparation/rehearsal process and did he/she
communicate necessary organization to the participants?
Responsibility: Did the student “coach” show
responsibility through being at scheduled events, being on
time, and having a professional, respectful demeanor when
working on the project?
Expertise: Did the student “coach” appear to have a good
working knowledge of his/her subject material?
People Skills: Did the student “coach” work well with
participants on the product? Did he/she communicate
respectfully and appropriately with participants?
1
Low
2
3
Fair
4
5
High
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Performance:
Habits: Was the presenter poised and “in character” for the
entire performance?
Habits: Did the presenter use good performance habits
(voice control, gestures, eye contact, stage presence)?
Rehearsal: Did the presenter appear to have adequately
prepared and rehearsed the performance, so that the
performance is smooth and seemingly without error?
Creativity: Did the performance exhibit proper creative
expression and interpretation for the material and the
audience?
1
Low
2
3
Fair
4
5
High
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Low
2
3
Fair
4
5
High
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Presentation:
Did the presenter use good speech habits (voice control,
gestures, eye contact)?
Did the presenter appear to have a good working
knowledge of his/her subject material?
Did the presentation offer new, interesting, or educational
information?
Was the presenter organized in terms of an introduction,
body, and conclusion?
Did the presenter offer quality answers to questions posed
to him/her after the presentation?
Did you feel the presenter was enthusiastic about his/her
subject area?
Please add specific comments not covered in the evaluations above:
Financial Projects Only: All financial aspects of this project have been resolved satisfactorily.
__________________________________
Associated Student Body Advisor
______________
Date
PERFORMANCE PROJECT SCORING GUIDE
General Criteria
Coaching
Performing
Presenting
6
• Purpose is clear and is
exceptionally appropriate
to the intended audience
(interests/needs, attitudes,
level of maturity,
background, knowledge,
etc.)
• Performance was wellprepared in all elements
(personal & technical);
began on time; and
reflected the preparation
that went into creating it.
• Performance succeeds at
its purpose at a high level
of quality and provides an
excellent model for others.
6
Student “coach/director”
• exhibited a high level of
organization and
communicated that
organization to participants.
• showed a high degree of
responsibility when working
on the project and was
present, punctual, and
respectful.
• communicated a high level
of expertise to the
participants increasing the
quality of the presentation.
• exhibited exceptional
communication and
interpersonal skills.
6
• Excellent performance
habits (stage
presence/blocking,
projection, vocal
inflection, enunciation,
etc.)
• Performance seemed very
rehearsed and was smooth
with all lines memorized
flawlessly.
• Performance exhibited a
high degree of creative
expression.
6
• Excellent speech habits (eye
contact, volume, vocal
inflection, enunciation, etc.)
including excellent use of
presentation aids.
• Knowledge of subject was
easy to see and new and
interesting information was
revealed.
• Organization of the
presentation was excellent
with points easy to
understand and a POW
conclusion.
• Enthusiasm for the subject
was obvious and infectious.
5
5
5
5
4
• Purpose of presentation is
somewhat clear and is
adequately appropriate to
the intended audience.
• Performance was wellprepared in all elements
(personal & technical);
began on time; and
reflected the preparation
that went into creating it.
• Performance succeeds in
its purpose in a general
way.
4
Student “coach/director”
• exhibited fair organization
and communicated that
organization to participants.
• showed responsibility when
working on the project and
was present, punctual, and
respectful.
• communicated some
expertise to the participants
which was refelected in the
quality of the presentation.
• generally exhibited
appropriate communication
and interpersonal skills.
4
• Adequate performance
habits (stage
presence/blocking,
projection, vocal
inflection, enunciation,
etc.)
• Performance seemed
rehearsed and was fairly
smooth with only a few
noticeable errors.
• Performance exhibited
some creative expression.
4
• Adequate speech habits (eye
contact, volume, vocal
inflection, enunciation, etc.)
including adequate use of
presentation aids.
• Knowledge of subject was
easy to see.
• Organization of the
presentation was adequate.
Conclusion was adequate.
• Exhibited some enthusiasm
for the subject.
3
3
3
3
2
• Purpose of presentation is
unclear and is partially
address the intended
audience.
• Performance began late or
without details (personal
and technical) taken care
of; and/or seemed
unrehearsed.
• Performance only partially
achieves its purpose.
2
Student “coach/director”
• exhibited little organization
• showed little responsibility
(was late, missed
appointments, and/or was
disrespectful.
• communicated little
expertise to participants.
• exhibited inappropriate
communication and
interpersonal skills.
2
• Inadequate performance
habits.
• Performance seemed
unrehearsed and had
several noticeable errors.
• Performance exhibited
little creative expression.
2
• Inadequate speech habits
including no/ poor use of
presentation aids.
• Knowledge of subject was
weak and/or incomplete.
• Organization of the
presentation was weak.
Conclusion was weak or
missing.
• Exhibited little enthusiasm.
1
1
1
1