Professor Susan E. Dudley Director, Regulatory Studies Center Philosophical underpinnings of US regulatory policy & process Changing role of regulation in the US Case studies of regulatory change ◦ Economic regulation ◦ Social regulation US regulatory process & policy today Stories! ◦ OIRA Administrator ◦ Interaction between WH, Agencies, Congress, Courts Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Establish Justice, Insure domestic Tranquility, Provide for the common defence, Promote the general Welfare, Secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity The U.S. Constitution, September 17, 1787 Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu “Justice” ◦ Transparent & accountable ◦ Administrative Procedure Act ◦ Recourse for affected parties “General Welfare” ◦ “Public interest” vs. special interest ◦ Role of analysis to define “public interest” “Blessings of Liberty” ◦ Value freedom & diversity ◦ Role for market forces ◦ Non-enumerated powers left to States & People Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Police power ◦ Restrict individual rights and property rights ◦ To protect general security, health, safety, morals, welfare Federalism ◦ Police power belongs to states ◦ Zoning & property regulation Commerce clause ◦ “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes" Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Legislative Make laws Executive Judicial Execute laws Adjudicate laws Laws Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu US Legislative Branch issues & President signs legislation Executive Branch implements regulation ◦ Regulatory analysis ◦ Executive oversight ◦ Public comment EU Judicial Branch hears appeals European Commission proposes legislation ◦ Impact Analysis ◦ Inter-service consultation ◦ Stakeholder consultation European Council & Parliament amend ◦ Additional impact analysis possible Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Taxation & subsequent spending ◦ Fiscal budget ◦ Appropriations Legislation & regulation ◦ Police power ◦ “Off-budget” ◦ Benefits and costs less transparent OMB’s role ◦ Budget ◦ Regulation – Management – Legislation Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Federal Register Pages: 1940-2009 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu 2008 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 1964 1962 1960 1958 1956 1954 1952 1950 1948 1946 1944 1942 1940 0 Response to concerns over “delegation” of legislative authority to Executive branch Agency can only act within limits set by statutes Agency must follow specified procedures Agency actions must be ◦ Reasonable (supported by record) ◦ Not arbitrary and capricious ◦ Not an abuse of discretion Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Federal Register Pages: 1940-2009 100000 90000 1970s - 1980s: Period of regulatory change 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu 2008 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 1964 1962 1960 1958 1956 1954 1952 1950 1948 1946 1944 1942 1940 0 Budgetary Costs of Federal Regulation Adjusted for Inflation $60 Billions of Constant 2005 Dollars $50 $40 $30 $20 Social $10 Economic 2010 2005 2000 1995 Years 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 1965 1960 $0 Source: Weidenbaum Center, Washington University and the Regulatory Studies Center, the George Washington University. Derived from the Budget of the United States Government and related documents, various fiscal years. Staffing of Federal Regulatory Agencies 300,000 Full-time Equivalent Personnel 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 Social 50,000 Economi 2010 2005 2000 1995 Years 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 1965 1960 0 Source: Weidenbaum Center, Washington University and the Regulatory Studies Center, the George Washington University. Derived from the Budget of the United States Government and related documents, various fiscal years. Justified by ◦ Natural monopoly ◦ “Destructive competition” Generally controls: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Price (max or min) Quantity Service Quality Number of firms Often industry-specific/Independent agency ◦ Airlines (CAB) ◦ Rails (ICC) ◦ Telecommunications (FCC) Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Goal – mimic competitive market prices Hard to get regulated price right ◦ Prices > competitive levels reduces consumption ◦ Prices < competitive levels creates shortages Cost-of-service regulation inflates costs Regulation stifles innovation & entrepreneurship Encourages “rent-seeking” ◦ Regulation transfers wealth ◦ “Dead-weight losses” Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Despite opposition from vested interests: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Airlines Interstate trucking Telecomm Oil & gas Outcomes generally a success ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Lower prices for consumers Increased choices Service quality & customer preference better aligned Innovation & real social gains (some unanticipated) Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Academic research ◦ Evaluate existing policies ◦ Identify problems ◦ Propose alternatives Advise political process ◦ President, Congress, Courts ◦ CWPS, CAB, OMB, CEA Policy promotion ◦ Gain political support ◦ Collaboration between analysts & lobbyists ◦ Communication & selling Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Budgetary Costs of Federal Regulation Adjusted for Inflation $60 Billions of Constant 2005 Dollars $50 $40 $30 $20 Social $10 Economic 2010 2005 2000 1995 Years 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 1965 1960 $0 Source: Weidenbaum Center, Washington University and the Regulatory Studies Center, the George Washington University. Derived from the Budget of the United States Government and related documents, various fiscal years. Health, safety, environment Across industries ◦ Environmental Protection Agency ◦ Dept of Transportation ◦ Occupational Safety & Health Administration Different justification ◦ Externalities ◦ Inadequate (asymmetric) information Regulatory reform vs. deregulation ◦ “Smarter” or “Better” regulation Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Authorizing legislation Unified Agenda Draft proposal Executive review ◦ SBREFA ◦ OIRA Public comment Revisions OIRA review Final rule published Congressional review (CRA) Judicial review (lawsuits) Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu US – Regulatory impact analysis Economically significant rules Issuing agency has primary responsibility OIRA reviews & coordinates Net benefits focus • Identify need • Examine alternatives • Understand consequences (benefits & costs) EU – Impact assessment • • Most important & far reaching rules Lead DG has primary responsibility • Inter-service Steering Board • • Impact Assessment Board reviews Consider 3 types of effects • Economic • Social • Environmental Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu Need for regulation (market failure)? Federal role? Alternatives? Costs, effectiveness, benefits? Quality of supporting information? Distributional effects? www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu International regulatory coordination E-government ◦ Transparency ◦ Engage public Regulatory analysis ◦ Resistance to analysis ◦ Intergenerational & global issues ◦ Behavioral research Susan E. Dudley, Director GW Regulatory Studies Center www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz