LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 414
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' MEETING
June 6, 2016
Individuals with disabilities who may need a modification to participate in a board
meeting should contact the superintendent's office as soon as possible in advance of a
meeting so that special arrangements may be made.
CONSENT AGENDA
A consent agenda has been established by the board in order to eliminate the time-consuming task of
acting on routine and repetitive business items. These items are now placed in a consent agenda
package and will be voted on at one time. If you see an item on the consent agenda that you would like
to have publicly discussed, please discuss your concern with a board member prior to action on the
consent agenda.
Lake Washington School District Acronyms
AP: Advanced Placement
LC: Learning Community - The district is divided into
four learning communities. Each one is made up of a
high school and the elementary schools and junior highs
that feed into it. The four learning communities are:
Eastlake, Juanita, Lake Washington, and Redmond.
AVID: Advancement Via Individual
Determination
LEAP: Learning Enhancement & Academic
Planning
B/CR: Board/CEO Relationship
MSP: Measurement of Student Progress
CAA: Certificate of Academic Achievement
NSBA - National School Board Association
CADR: College Academic Distribution
Requirements
OSPI: Office of Superintendent of Public
Instruction
CBA: Classroom-Based Assessments
PCC: Professional Community & Collaboration
CDSA: Common District Summative Assessments
PLC: Professional Learning Community
CEDARS: Comprehensive Education Data and
Research System (CEDARS)
PLIE: Planning, Learning, Implementation, and
Evaluation
CIA: Certificate of Individual Achievement
Policy Governance: A governance process used by the
school board. This sets forth “End Results (ER)” that
the superintendent must reach, while abiding by
“Executive Limitations (EL).” ER include the district’s
mission. EL provide the boundaries for how the
superintendent and staff can get to the goals. See the
board policy section on web site for more information.
AMO: Annual Measurable Objectives
AMAO: Annual Measurable Achievement
Objective in English Language Proficiency
CIP: Continuous Improvement Process
CLT: Central Leadership Team
COE: Collection of Evidence
CTE: Career & Technical Education
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early
Literacy Skills
Quest: Highly Capable program for students in gr. 2-8
DLT: District Leadership Team (manager level
and above, includes both certified and classified)
RTI: Response to Intervention
EL: Executive Limitations (See Policy
Governance)
RCW: Revised Codes of Washington
SALT: Strategic Advisory Leadership Team
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
ELL: English Language Learners
SBAC: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
EOC: End of Course
SBE: State Board of Education
ER: End Results (formerly known as ENDs).
Goals set forth by the board, including the mission
of the district.
sMAS: Secondary Mobile Access for Students
ESEA: Elementary and Secondary Education Act
GP: Governance Process (Board)
HCP: Highly Capable Program
HSBP: High School and Beyond Plan
HSPE: High School Proficiency Exam
KISN: Kindergarten Intensive Safety Net
KPI: Key Performance Indicators
STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics
WAC: Washington Administrative Codes
WaNIC: Washington Network for Innovative
Careers
WELPA: Washington English Language
Proficiency Assessment
WLPT: Washington Language Proficiency Test
WSSDA: Washington State School Directors
Association
June 2, 2016
Nancy Bernard
President, Board of Directors
Lake Washington School District No. 414
Redmond, WA 98052
Dear Mrs. Bernard:
I am transmitting herewith the agenda for the Board of Directors’ regular meeting
of June 6, 2016 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Resource Center,
16250 NE 74th Street, Redmond, WA.
Order of Business
1. Convene, Roll Call
2. Approve Agenda
3. Recognitions
4. Public Comment
5. Consent Agenda
6. Non-Consent Agenda
7. Superintendent Report
8. Legislative Update
9. Board Follow-Up
10. Future Agenda Items
11. Debrief
12. Board Member Comments
13. Adjourn
Sincerely,
Traci Pierce
Superintendent
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Board of Directors’ Meeting
L.E. Scarr Resource Center Board Room
June 6, 2016
5:00 p.m.
6:15 p.m.
6:30 p.m.
Study Session
Topic: Budget
Location: Robert Hughes Room
Executive Session re employee performance
Reception for PTSA Scholarship Recipients
Location: Lobby, L.E. Scarr Resource Center
Time
Action
7:00 p.m.
Convene, Roll Call
Policy
Approve Agenda
Recognitions


2016 Outstanding PTA of the Year PTSA Scholarships Awards - Scholarship Chair Wendy DeLong Student Scholarships - $1,000 college scholarships Jonathan Chang – Eastlake High School Riley Martin – Juanita High School Loann Nguyen – Lake Washington High School Rebecca Cauthorn – Redmond High School
Jane Wierenga Memorial Scholarship - $1,000 college scholarship Brielle Garcia – Juanita High School
LWEA/Karen Bates Scholarship - $1,000 college scholarship Kaitlyn Lee – Eastlake High School
Bob Hughes Scholarship - $1,000 college scholarship Anthony Humay – Eastlake High School
Dr. Don Saul Scholarship - $1,000 college scholarship Forrest Malcolm – Lake Washington High School
Jackie Pendergrass Scholarship - $1,000 college scholarship
Torrey Nielsen – Eastlake High School
Victoria Findley Scholarship - $1,000 college scholarship Julianna Olde – Eastlake High School
At Large Scholarships - $1,000 college scholarships Katherine Vasquez – Eastlake High School Nicholas Goodwin – Juanita High School LWSD Staff/LW PTSA Scholarships - $500 scholarships Hannah Chang – Samantha Smith Elementary School
Laura Koetke – Lake Washington High School
Tab
Page
AGENDA
June 6, 2015
Page 2
Time
Action
Policy
Tab
Page
Public Comment
GP-3 (Board Job Description)
Consent Agenda
GP-8 (Annual Agenda Planning)

Vouchers

Minutes – {May 16 board meeting and study session}
1
1

Human Resources Report
 Salary Schedules
2
5

Non-renewal of Provisional Contract
3
10

Change Order #2
Redmond Elementary School Classroom Addition Project
4
11

Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2016-2021
5
12

Monitor Board Policy
 EL-14, Technology

Donations
B/CR (Monitoring CEO Performance)
6
13
7
14
8
15
Non-Consent Agenda

District Textbook Adoption
Math, Middle School
Superintendent Report
EL-3 (Communication & Council
Legislative Update
GP-3 (Board Job Description)
Board Follow-Up
GP-3 (Board Job Description)
Future Agenda Items
EL-3 (Communication & Council
Debrief
GP-2 (Governing Style)
Board Member Comments
GP-3 (Board Job Description)
Adjourn
to the Board)
to the Board)
AGENDA
June 6, 2015
Page 3
Next Board Meeting:
June 20, 2016
5:00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Study Session
Topic: College and Career Readiness Task Force Update
Location: Robert Hughes Room
Board Meeting
Location: Board Room
L.E. Scarr Resource Center
16250 NE 74th Street
Redmond, WA 98052 OFFICIAL MINUTES
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 414
Board of Directors' Study Session
May 16, 2016
The May 16, 2016 study session was called to order by
President Nancy Bernard at 5:45 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
Members present: Nancy Bernard, Siri Bliesner, Chris
Carlson, Mark Stuart, and Eric Laliberte.
U
ROLL CALL
U
U
Present: Superintendent Traci Pierce.
The board met in executive session at 5:45 p.m. to conduct
superintendent evaluation. The meeting was reconvened at
6:00 p.m.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The topic discussed was:
TOPIC

Long-Term Facility Planning, Choice/Innovation
Policy
The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
U
____________________________________
Nancy Bernard, President
U
____________________________________
U
Traci Pierce, Superintendent
Diane Jenkins
Recording Secretary
U
OFFICIAL MINUTES
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 414
Board of Directors' Meeting
May 16, 2016
The board meeting was called to order by President Nancy
Bernard at 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
Members present: Nancy Bernard, Chris Carlson, Siri Bliesner,
Mark Stuart, and Eric Laliberte.
ROLL CALL
Present: Superintendent Traci Pierce.
Chris Carlson moved to approve the agenda. Seconded by Siri
Blienser.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Motion carried.
Chris Carlson moved to approve the consent agenda. Seconded
by Siri Bliesner.
CONSENT AGENDA
Nancy Bernard, yes; Chris Carlson, yes; Siri Bliesner, yes; Mark
Stuart, yes; and Eric Laliberte, yes.
Motion carried.
Approves May 2 study session and board meeting minutes.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approves May 18, 2016 Human Resources Report.
APPROVAL OF HUMAN
RESOURCES REPORT
Approval of the following instructional materials for use in the
Lake Washington schools -
INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS ADOPTION
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
J.B.
Archibald MacLeish
Houghton Mifflin
1972
100
$12.00 per book
International Community School
Grade 9
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Edge
Multiple
National Geographic Cengage
2014
45
$440.00 per student
District Intervention Program
Grade 9
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 414
Board of Directors' Meeting
May 18, 2015
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Inside
Multiple
National Geographic Cengage
2014
45
$500.00 per student
District Intervention Program
Grade 6
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Station Eleven
Emily St. John Mandel
Vintage
2014
Students will purchase their own for summer reading
$9.79
Eastlake High School
Grade 9
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
I’M NOT SCARED… I’M PREPARED!
Because I Know All About ALiCE
Julia Cook
National Center for Youth Issues
2014
22 – 1 for each classroom
$10.00
Peter Kirk Elementary
Grades K-5
The Poisonwood Bible
Barbara Kingsolver
Harper Collins
1998
64
$12.00 per book
Eastlake High School
Grade 12
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress
Dai Sijie
Alfred A. Knopf New York
2001
160
$8.72 per book
Eastlake High School
Grade 9
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
A Blessing Over Ashes
Adam Fifield
William Morris
2001
30
$13.99 per book
Juanita High School
Grade 9
-2-
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 414
Board of Directors' Meeting
May 18, 2015
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Sin and Syntax
Constance Hale
Three Rivers Press
2001
Students purchase their own copies
$15.00
Lake Washington High School
Grade 11
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
So Long, See You Tomorrow
William Maxwell
Vintage
1980
64
$14.10
Lake Washington School District
Grade 11
Approves the monitoring report for ER-1, Mission and Vision,
as presented.
APPROVAL OF
MONITORING REPORT
ER-1, MISSION AND
VISION
Approves the monitoring report for EL-7, Academic Program, as
presented.
APPROVAL OF
MONITORING REPORT
EL-7, ACADEMIC
PROGRAM
Accepts the donations/grants as identified -
DONATIONS
Acceptance from Lake Washington Schools Foundation to Emerson
High in the amount of $2,691.43 to support high school STEM
Signature program.
Acceptance from Audubon Elementary PTSA to Audubon Elementary
in the amount of $4,597.50 to provide stipends for running club,
intramural sports, and music.
Acceptance from Emily Dickinson PTSA to Dickinson Elementary in
the amount of $2,015.00 to support outdoor education.
Acceptance from Albert Einstein PTSA to Einstein Elementary in the
amount of $5,230.95 to purchase subscription renewals for reading
program ($1,116.24) and IXL and First in Math ($3,015.20) and art
docent supplies ($1,099.51).
Acceptance from Explorer Community Parent Association to Explorer
in the amount of $1,143.00 to provide stipend for outdoor education.
-3-
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 414
Board of Directors' Meeting
May 18, 2015
Acceptance from Peter Kirk PTSA to Kirk Elementary School in the
amount of $1,044.50 to provide stipend for after-school flag football.
Acceptance from Christa McAuliffe PTSA to McAuliffe Elementary in
the amount of $5,600.00 to support safety patrol ($600.00) and
reimbursement for copy machine supplies ($5,000.00)
Acceptance from Usborne Books & More to Mann Elementary in the
amount of $1,704.40 to support library.
Acceptance from Carl Sandburg PTSA to Sandburg Elementary
School in the amount of $4,651.44 to support choir and math club.
Acceptance from Finn Hill Middle School PTSA to Finn Hill Middle
School in the amount of $6,929.12 to provide stipends for spring play
($2,857.50), support field trips ($2,200.00), and purchase student
planners ($1,871.62).
Acceptance from Northstar Advisory Council to Northstar Middle
School in the amount of $2,500.00 to support counselors.
Acceptance from Seattle Education Tour Center to Eastlake High
School in the amount of $1,200.00 to support Japanese program.
Acceptance from Washington DECA to Eastlake High School in the
amount of $1,400.00 to support DECA.
TOTAL $33,418.41
Mark Stuart moved to adjourn. Seconded by Chris Carlson.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:40 p.m.
____________________________________
Nancy Bernard, President
____________________________________
Traci Pierce, Superintendent
Diane Jenkins
Recording Secretary
-4-
Human Resources Board Report
June 6, 2016
NEW PERSONNEL
Name
Position
Location
Salary/Rate
Start Date
Reason
Anderson, Laconna
Health Room Secretary
Redmond HS
$18.87
12/15/15
Budgeted
Bailey, Nash
Instructional Assist
Extended Day
$14.18
01/07/16
Repl. A. Byrd
Barbour, Mary
Sp Ed Para Ed/ Instructional Assist
Blackwell Elem
$17.18/$14.84
12/15/15
Budgeted
Bell, Elliott
Instructional Assistant
Extended Day
$14.84
01/04/16
Repl. J. Redlin
Bell, Helen
Instructional Assistant
Alcott Elem
$14.84
01/25/16
Budgeted
Berkeihiser, Christopher NC
.4 Teacher
International CS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Brand, Joni NC
Teacher
WANIC Skills Center
C-7
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Bunnell, John
Special Ed Para Ed
Franklin Elem
$17.18
01/04/16
Repl. L. Sachnoff
Chappon, Michelle
Special Ed Para Ed
Redmond HS
$17.18
01/04/16
Repl. R. Rogers
Chester, Tracy NC
Pool
Elem Pool
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Chetenwala, Bindu
Health Room Secretary
Eastlake HS
$18.87
01/13/16
Budgeted
Christensen, Rachel NC
Teacher
Evergreen MS
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Cohn, Lauren NC
.8 Teacher
Finn Hill MS/Northstar
A-0
A-2
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Compton, Daniel NC
.4 Teacher
Evergreen MS
C-10
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Cotton Betteridge, Colleen NC .4 Teacher
Kamiakin MS
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
DiPaul, Christopher NC
Psychologist
Special Services
D-16
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Dowst, Adrian NC
Teacher
Lake Washington HS
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Duncan, Elizabeth NC
Teacher
Finn Hill MS
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Eirich, Shelley NC
Teacher
International CS
A-4
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Elofson, Leanna NC
Teacher
Sp Ed Pool
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Fanning, Shelly
Account Tech III
Resource Center
$21.54
01/25/16
Repl. P. Nilsson
Feeney, Cynthia NC
.5 Teacher
Dickinson Elem
A-5
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Flagg, Laura NC
.2 Teacher
Eastlake HS
D-5
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Fraczek, John NC
Teacher
Evergreen MS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Fulwiler, Jennifer NC
Teacher
Inglewood MS
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Gremmert, Susan NC
.6 Teacher
Dickinson Elem
D-4
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Haeffele, Melinda
Secretary/Instructional Assist
Parks Elem
$18.87/14.84
11/30/15
Budgeted
Haggerty, Elizabeth NC
Library Media Specialist
Kirkland MS
C-9
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Human Resources Board Report
June 6, 2016
NEW PERSONNEL - Con't
Name
Position
Location
Salary/Rate
Start Date
Reason
Hamilton, Dana NC
Teacher
Evergreen MS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Hammond, Laurin P1
Teacher
Lake Washington HS
A-2
08/29/16
Budgeted
Haney, Lindsay NC
Teacher
Lake Washington HS
C-9
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Hanson, Kerry NC
Teacher
Evergreen MS
D-6
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Haworth Jr, David NC
.8 Teacher
Elem Pool
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Horner, Michelle NC
.1 Teacher
Rockwell Elem
D-8
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Huffman, Cassie NC
Teacher
Twain Elem
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Hutchinson, Kyle NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Jones, Audrey NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Jones, Ryan NC
.2 Teacher
Inglewood MS
A-3
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Kells, Elva NC
Teacher
Frost Elem
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Kim, Gloria NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Knott, Jaime NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Kretschmar, Karson NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
MacDonald, Danielle NC
.5 Teacher
Lake Washington HS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Mackay, Katriona NC
Teacher
Audubon Elem
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
MaGee, Meika P1
Occupational Therapist
Special Services
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Matrecano, Lizanne NC
Teacher
Kirkland MS
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Merwine, Keira NC
.6 Teacher
Finn Hill MS/Lake Wash HS
C-4
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Meyer, Danielle NC
.6 Teacher
Eastlake HS
D-11
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Nash, Megan NC
Teacher
Thoreau Elem
A-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Nasir, Fareeha NC
Teacher
Alcott Elem
A_0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Nelson, Kaycie NC
Teacher
Inglewood MS
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Nguyen, Thuy-Tien
Health Room Secretary
Redmond MS
$18.87
12/08/15
Budgeted
Nichols, Jonathan NC
Teacher
Juanita HS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Nielsen, Brynn NC
Counselor
Frost Elem
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Olafson, Mary NC
Teacher
Kirkland MS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Olson, Paula NC
.5 Counselor
Eastlake HS
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Palmer, Kathryn NC
Teacher
Juanita HS
A-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Human Resources Board Report
June 6, 2016
NEW PERSONNEL - Con't
Name
Position
Location
Salary/Rate
Start Date
Reason
Paul, Scott NC
Counselor
Inglewood MS
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Pesavento, Mary Ellen NC
Teacher
Special Services
D-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Pitsch, Melissa NC
.1 Teacher
Lakeview Elem
B-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Placencio, Rambo NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Potter, Tracy NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Predmore, Rebekah NC
Teacher
Kirkland MS
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Rakel, Shelby
Special Ed Para Ed
Dickinson Elem
$17.18
09/25/16
Budgeted
Rossman, Karen NC
Teacher
Rose Hill MS
D-12
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Ruckman, Jennifer NC
.4 Teacher
Kamiakin MS
A-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Said, Monta NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Sloan, David NC
Teacher
Elem Pool
D-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Sloman, Rhoda
Secretary/Instructional Assist
Sandburg Elem
$18.87/$14.84
01/04/16
Budgeted
Sneifer, Michelle NC
.2 Teacher
Rose Hill MS
B-9
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Snider, Jonathan NC
Teacher
Redmond Elem
C-12
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Sparkuhl, Matt NC
Teacher
Elem PE Pool
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Sreeramalu, Prabha
Special Ed Para Ed
Dickinson Elem
$17.18
01/04/16
Budgeted
Stanley, Elizabeth NC
Teacher
Smith Elem
C-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Steward, Miranda NC
.6 Teacher
Juanita HS
A-4
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Stoddard, Ashlyn NC
.2 Teacher
Redmond MS
A-2
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Stroud, Jessica NC
Teacher
Evergreen MS
A-2
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Tichauer, Nicole NC
Teacher
Pool Elem
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Trethewey, Deborah NC
Teacher
Rosa Parks Elem
D-4
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Tseng, Sirikanya
Special Ed Para Ed
Juanita Elem
$17.18
12/02/15
Budgeted
Van Buskirk, Tanya NC
.5 Teacher
WANIC Skills Center
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Voet, Martina NC
Teacher
Rose Hill MS
A-0
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Wagner, Deborah
Associate Director
Special Services
$133,845.00
07/01/16
Repl. R. Burden
Walter, Christina NC
Counselor
Evergreen MS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Walter, Julia NC
Teacher
Rose Hill MS
C-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Weidkamp, Kailey NC
Teacher
Dickinson Elem
A-1
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Human Resources Board Report
June 6, 2016
NEW PERSONNEL - Con't
Name
Position
Location
Salary/Rate
Start Date
Reason
Woehlbrandt, Nicholas NC
Teacher
Evergreen MS
C-4
08/29/16
Leave Replacement
Yim, Nancy
Instructional Assist
Stella Schola MS
$14.18
11/18/15
Budgeted
RETIREMENTS/RESIGNATIONS/TERMINATIONS
Name
Position
Location
Start
Effective Date Reason
Anderson, Sean
Special Ed Para Ed
Kamiakin MS
09/01/15
06/15/16
Resignation
Angula, Stephanie
Teacher
Redmond MS
08/27/08
06/15/16
.4 Resignation
Brew, Dawn
Instructional Assist
Mead Elem
06/17/99
06/15/16
Resignation
Brown, Karin
Instructional Assist
Frost Elem
11/03/83
06/15/16
Retirement
Clagg, Dina
Instructional Specialist
Resource Center
08/24/15
06/15/16
Resignation
Cockrell, Colin
Instructional Assist
Kirk Elem
08/04/15
06/15/16
Resignation
Cox, Emily
Special Ed Para Ed
Juanita Elem
02/17/15
06/08/16
Resignation
Dooley, Shari
Instructional Assist
Franklin Elem
10/15/12
06/15/16
Resignation
Evans, James
Special Ed Para Ed
Juanita HS
09/02/14
06/15/16
Resignation
Fife, Renee
Teacher
Keller Elem
08/28/80
06/15/16
Retirement
Fleming, Kathleen
Teacher
Muir Elem
05/01/95
06/15/16
Retirement
Furness, Donald
Teacher
Redmond MS
09/10/90
06/15/16
.4 Resignation
Grimes, Morgan
Teacher
Keller Elem
08/25/14
06/15/16
Resignation
Heinz, JoAnn
Library Media Specialist
Audubon Elem
08/24/10
06/15/16
Retirement
Holec, Meribeth
Special Ed Para Ed
McAuliffe Elem
08/25/14
06/15/16
Resignation
Howling, Thereza
School Secretary
Stella Schola
09/01/15
08/31/16
Resignation
Israel, Toby
Teacher
Alcott Elem
08/24/05
06/15/16
Retirement
Keeler, Michelle
Teacher
Redmond HS
08/24/09
06/15/16
Resignation
Kelley, Elizabeth
Library Media Specialist
Keller Elem
03/12/07
06/15/16
Resignation
Koch, Eugene
Teacher
Emerson High
08/30/84
06/15/16
Resignation
Kono, Shelly
Instructional Assist
Alcott Elem
10/05/15
06/15/16
Resignation
Lerner, Deborah
Office Manager I
Renaissance
04/06/05
06/24/16
Resignation
Lewis, Lori
Special Ed Para Ed
Kamiakin MS
09/10/13
05/11/16
Resignation
Human Resources Board Report
June 6, 2016
RETIREMENTS/RESIGNATIONS/TERMINATIONS
Name
Position
Location
Start
Effective Date Reason
Lybeck, Betty
Teacher
Evergreen MS
09/03/96
08/31/16 (rev)
Retirement
Mankowski, Matthew
Special Ed Para Ed
McAuliffe Elem
09/03/13
06/15/16
Resignation
McMurray, Jaclyn
Psychologist
Special Services
08/27/08
09/01/16
.6 Resignation
Murel, Barbara
Instructional Assist
Juanita HS
9/9/1998
06/15/16
Retirement
Riggs, Victoria
Speech Language Path
Special Services
08/27/12
06/15/16
Resignation
Ritscher-Oddson, Linda
Teacher
Muir Elem
08/28/80
06/15/16
Retirement
Sachnoff, Lynn
Special Ed Para Ed
Juanita Elem
02/20/14
06/14/16
Resignation
Shively Sanders, Karen
Teacher
Frost Elem
08/29/11
06/15/16
.5 Resignation
Sinclair, Heather
Associate Principal
Alcott Elem
09/15/14
06/30/16
Resignation
Sushner, Michelle
Associate Principal
Sandburg Elem/Muir Elem
07/01/15
6/30/2016 (rev)
Resignation
Walker, Rose Ann
Teacher
Rose Hill MS
08/29/07
06/15/16
Retirement
Waters, Elizabeth
Office Manager II
Evergreen MS
08/15/05
06/30/16
Resignation
Weller, Carly
Teacher
Redmond HS
08/25/14
06/15/16
Resignation
Zarrabi-Kashani, Hanif
Instructional Assist
Juanita HS
10/26/15
06/15/16
Resignation
Name
Old Position
New Position
Effective Date
Reason
New Salary
Burden, Rick
Associate Director
Director of School Support
07/01/16
Repl. D. Larson
$147,775.00
Houtchens, Molly
Health Services Specialist
Health Services Supervisor
05/09/16
Budgeted
$88,475.00
CHANGE OF POSITION
Lake Washington School District
BASE
LWEA SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 2016-17
28847
Effective August 11, 2016
STEP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
32,453 33,405 34,328 35,251 36,059
1.125 1.158 1.190 1.222 1.250
180.29 185.58 190.71 195.84 200.33
25.76 26.51 27.24 27.98 28.62
#
#
#
#
36,866
1.278
204.81
29.26
37,299 38,193 39,030 39,838 40,617
1.293 1.324 1.353 1.381 1.408
207.22 212.18 216.83 221.32 225.65
29.60 30.31 30.98 31.62 32.24
41,280 42,232 43,271 44,713 46,155 47,598
1.431 1.464 1.500 1.550 1.600 1.650
229.33 234.62 240.39 248.41 256.42 264.43
32.76 33.52 34.34 35.49 36.63 37.78
42,145 42,953 43,703 44,453 45,088
1.461 1.489 1.515 1.541 1.563
234.14 238.63 242.79 246.96 250.49
33.45 34.09 34.68 35.28 35.78
#
45,722 46,588 47,598 49,040 50,482 51,925 53,367 54,809 56,252 56,252 56,252 57,348
1.585 1.615 1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.988
254.01 258.82 264.43 272.44 280.46 288.47 296.48 304.49 312.51 312.51 312.51 318.60
36.29 36.97 37.78 38.92 40.07 41.21 42.35 43.50 44.64 44.64 44.64 45.51
47,021 47,713 48,405 49,069 49,617
1.630 1.654 1.678 1.701 1.720
261.23 265.07 268.92 272.61 275.65
37.32 37.87 38.42 38.94 39.38
50,165 50,973 51,925 53,367 54,809 56,252 57,694 59,136 60,579 62,021 63,463 64,704
1.739 1.767 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200 2.243
278.69 283.18 288.47 296.48 304.49 312.51 320.52 328.53 336.55 344.56 352.57 359.47
39.81 40.45 41.21 42.35 43.50 44.64 45.79 46.93 48.08 49.22 50.37 51.35
STAFF A
BA
Factor
Daily Rate
Hourly Rate
STAFF B
BA + 45
Factor
Daily Rate
Hourly Rate
STAFF C
MA/BA+90
Factor
Daily Rate
Hourly Rate
STAFF D
MA+45/BA+135*
Factor
Daily Rate
Hourly Rate
• Placement of teachers on the salary schedule shall be according to their years of experience and education
• Teachers on the Staff D lane with a BA Degree + 135 credits who subsequently earn an MA Degree will remain in the staff D lane
• For an earned doctorate stipend add .15 of base salary ($4,327)
# Teachers in cell A-0, A-1, A-2, A-3 will be paid at $35,700 (Daily rate $198.33, hourly rate $28.33), and C-0 will be paid $42,801 (Daily rate
$237.78, hourly rate $33.97)
• Base salary includes 180 work days, daily rate is calculated as base salary divided by 180 days, hourly rate is calculated as daily rate
divided by 7 hours per day*
* It is not possible to achieve this level for a BA+135 as of 9/94
Position Codes:
F*A = Classroom Teacher
F*B = Resource Teacher
F*C = PE/Music Teacher
F*E = Counselor
F*F = Special Services
F*G = Leadership/Coordination
F*D = Librarian
Lake Washington School District
LWEA INFORMATIONAL SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 2016-17 LEAP DAYS (8)
Effective August 11, 2016
STEP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BA
1,587
1,587
1,587
1,587
1,603
1,638
BA + 45
1,658
1,697
1,735
1,771
1,805
MA/BA+90
1,902
1,909
1,942
1,976
MA+45/BA+135
2,090
2,121
2,151
2,181
11
12
13
14
15
16
1,835
1,877
1,923
1,987
2,051
2,115
2,004
2,032
2,071
2,115
2,180
2,244
2,308
2,372
2,436
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,549
2,205
2,230
2,265
2,308
2,372
2,436
2,500
2,564
2,628
2,692
2,756
2,821
2,876
• Placement on the incentive schedule will be according to placement on the teachers salary schedule
• Teachers in cells A-0, A-1, A-2, A-3 shall receive pay based on statewide minimum salary for Bachelors degree of $35,700
teachers in cell C-0 shall receive incentive pay based on statewide minimum salary for Masters degree of $42,801
Lake Washington School District
LWEA INFORMATIONAL SALARY SCHEDULE FOR 2016-17 RESPONSIBILITY CONTRACT
Effective August 11, 2016
STEP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BA
5,355
5,457
5,559
5,662
5,409
5,530
BA + 45
5,595
5,729
5,855
5,976
6,093
MA/BA+90
6,420
6,443
6,555
6,668
MA+45/BA+135
7,053
7,157
7,261
7,360
6,192
6,335
6,491
6,707
6,923
7,140
6,763
6,858
6,988
7,140
7,356
7,572
7,443
7,525
7,646
7,789
8,005
8,221
• Placement on the incentive schedule will be according to placement on the teachers salary schedule
11
12
13
14
15
16
7,789
8,005
8,221
8,438
8,438
8,438
8,602
8,438
8,654
8,870
9,087
9,303
9,519
9,706
Lake Washington School District
LWEA ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SCHEDULE FOR 2016-17
Effective August 11, 2016
Curriculum Hourly Rate
$35.00
Professional Fund
An additional $2,000 per year that can be used to pay for up to 4 additional days at a rate of $500 per day OR
instructional materials, workshops, conference fees and/or tuition. Prorated based on FTE.
Incentive for Attracting and Retaining Teachers
Experience Level
0-4 years
5-9 years
10-16 years
17-20 years
21-24 years
25 years and above
Salary
$500
$1,000
$2,000
$2,800
$4,100
$9,000
The salary listed above will be paid in addition to base salary placement. Years of experience will be recognized in accordance with
Section 22.1.1 of LWEA bargaining agreement. Incentive will be prorated based on FTE.
Workload Recognition
An additional $500 stipend will be paid in addition to base salary placement. Prorated based on FTE
Technology Skill Application and Integration Contract
An additional $1,400 stipend will be paid.
APPENDIX C - SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS
Section C.4
The daily rate of pay for Substitute Teachers for 2015-162016-17 will be $153159.00.
Section C.5
When substitutes work a half day (3 ½ hours) or less they will be paid ½ the substitute rate. When
substitutes work more than 3 ½ hours they will be paid the daily substitute rate. When the regular teacher
returns to the classroom prior to the conclusion of the substitute’s assigned full or half day, the substitute
will remain for their entire assignment (half or full-day) and may assist the teacher or perform other work
as assigned by the principal.
Section C.6
Substitutes who work six (6) to twenty (20) consecutive days in the same assignment shall be paid
$159165.00 per day.
Section C.7
Teachers who are retired from Lake Washington School District and who are placed on the substitute list
shall be paid at $174181.00 per day or $87.0090.50 for ½ day. Retired District teachers who work six (6)
to twenty (20) consecutive days in the same assignment shall be paid $180187.00 per day.
Section C.8
Substitutes who work 50-69 days will receive a bonus of $1,000; those who work 70-99 days will receive
$1,500; those who work 100 or more days will receive $2,000. A day shall be equal to one full day or two
half days. This bonus will be paid at the end of the school year in the July paycheck.
Section C.9
Long-term substitute assignments in excess of twenty (20) days will be paid at the contract teacher rate,
retroactive to the first day of assignment, except that when, in the judgment of Human Resources, the
assignment appears at the onset to be a long-term assignment, the contract teacher rate may be paid
from the beginning of the assignment.
Section C.10
The rates specified in C.4, C.6, and C.7 above shall be adjusted by the same percentage amount by
which the regular teacher salary may be adjusted.
Section C.11
If the daily rate for substitute teachers is adjusted during any fiscal year as a result of an adjustment to
the regular teacher salary, such adjustment will only apply prospectively from the date of the agreement
between the Association and the District. Substitute salary adjustments will not be retroactively applied to
days worked prior to such agreement.
Section C.12
The above salary is based on a full teacher workday, including planning time (if applicable). Whenever a
substitute is required by an administrator to cover a class during his/her scheduled planning time, the
substitute will receive additional compensation for this added responsibility. Such compensation will be at
the substitute hourly rate of pay.
Section C.13
Represented substitute teachers will earn paid sick leave according to the following:
A. One (1) prorated day for each twenty (20) consecutive days in the same assignment; i.e., or
B. Seven (7) hours of paid sick leave for each one-hundred-forty (140) hours of substitute service.
Such sick leave may be granted for absences caused by the employee's personal illness when such
employee is in an assignment of five (5) or more consecutive days. When absent due to personal illness,
the substitute will call the substitute system to cancel themselves out of the job and call the substitute
office and state that he or she is ill and will be using sick leave for the absence. Such days will not
accumulate from year to year and will not be available until they have been earned.
Section C.14
Substitutes will be allowed to self-pay for insurance benefits as provided by insurance contracts.
Approved: June 6, 2016
Effective: August 11, 2016
LWEA STIPEND SCHEDULE
2016-17
Effective: September 1, 2016
POSTION TITLE
POSITION
CODE
ELEM
MIDDLE
SENIOR
Activities/Athletic Coordinator
Z*AZ
2,650
6,830
Activities Supervisor
Z*AS
1,975
4,545
Advisory
Y*AS
Band
Z*BD
2,245
4,810
Z*CH
1,975
3,950
Choir/Chorus
Class Advisors
DISTRICT WIDE
2,275
Z*FR, Z*SO,
Z*JR, Z*SR
1,975
Curriculum
Y*CU
1,975
1,975
1,975
Debate
Z*DE
3,695
Drama
Z*DR
3,695
Drug & Alcohol Prevention:
Z*DA
1,975
Honor Society
Z*HS
1,975
Journalism
Z*JO
Math Olympiad
Z*MO
Music (counts as one optional)
Z*MU
2,245
Modernization Move (prorated by base FTE)
Z*MZ
1,190
Orchestra
Z*OR
Outdoor Education (overnight program)
Z*OE
1,975
Outdoor Education (field trip program)
Z*ON
980
Program Leads
Y*PL
Staff Chairperson I
Y*C1
Staff Chairperson II
Y*C2
Staff Development
Y*SD
Talent Show/Yearbook
Z*YB
1,975
3,120
1,975
1,190
1,190
2,245
2,245
2,245
1,490
1,490
3,365
1,975
1,975
1,975
1,975
3,115
NON-RENEWAL OF PROVISIONAL CONTRACT
June 6, 2016
SITUATION
Pursuant to RCW 28A.405.220, a letter of non-renewal of the provisional employment
contract of Jessica Polkinghorn was issued on May 13, 2016. Ms. Polkinghorn requested an
informal conference with the superintendent for the purpose of seeking reconsideration of
the decision to non-renew her provisional contract, as allowed for under the RCW. This
meeting took place on May 23, 2016. According to RCW 28A.405.220, it is the obligation of
the superintendent to either reinstate Ms. Polkinghorn’s contract for the following school
year or to provide a written report to the Board recommending the employment contract of
the provisional employee be non-renewed and state the reason or reasons.
A report regarding the recommendation and reasoning was prepared and provided to the
Board. Ms. Polkinghorn was also provided this report and the superintendent’s
recommendation as called for in the RCW. Ms. Polkinghorn has been advised of her right
to provide any additional information to the Board for consideration prior to the board
meeting. Any such information provided by Ms. Polkinghorn will be provided for the
Board’s consideration prior to taking action on the recommendation.
The Board’s final decision must be provided to Ms. Polkinghorn within ten days following
the meeting which the superintendent’s recommendation was considered.
RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors approves the non-renewal of Ms. Jessica Polkinghorn’s contract for
the 2016-2017 school year.
-10- CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
REDMOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION PROJECT
June 6, 2016
SITUATION
Change Order No. 2 for Redmond Elementary School Classroom Addition Project is
attached for your review. The change order includes seven (7) changes to the construction
contract for this project. All seven (7) changes are additive cost changes.
Three (3) Change Proposal Requests (CPRs) are due to jurisdiction requirements:
 CPR 08 adds cleanouts for footing drains in addition to those originally included in
permit and bid documents.
 CPR 11 compensates the contractor for City of Redmond electrical permit fees
beyond those originally included in bid.
 CPR 12 adds fire alarm/sensors required by the City in addition to those originally
included in bid documents.
Two (2) CPRs or Construction Change Directives (CCDs) are due to design coordination
issues:
 CPR 13 adds durable industrial coating to concrete siding and soffit panels.
 CPR 16 adds a waterproofing membrane above roof insulation to keep the insulation
from being wetted during the required spring season installation.
One (1) CPR and CCD is due to an owner-requested change:
 CPR 18 adds a temporary gravel walkway for student access around the northwest
corner of the construction area.
One (1) CPR is due to previously undiscovered conditions:
 CPR 19 adds cleaning of existing root-clogged storm drains required to be operable
for new construction
The cost of the changes from Change Order No. 2 is within the budget established for this
project. The total for change orders is 3.41% of the original construction contract amount.
Original Construction Contract Amount
$3,183,958.00
Current Change Order
Change Order 2
)
Total Change Orders
$41,115.00
Change Orders 1 thru 2
$108,440.00
Contract Amount including this Change Order
$3,292,398.00
RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors approves Change Order No. 2 to Lincoln Construction, Inc. for the
Redmond Elementary School Classroom Addition Project in the amount of $41,115,
increasing the contract amount to $3,292,398.
‐ 11 ‐ SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN, 2016-2021
June 6, 2016
SITUATION
The State of Washington Growth Management Act permits the collection of impact fees as
a means to partially pay for the cost of providing new building capacity to serve students
necessitated by new development. As a requirement for the collection of impact fees, the
six-year Capital Facilities Plan must be updated annually.
The six-year Capital Facilities Plan, 2016-2021, includes current enrollment projections and
the most recently approved projects included in the April 2016 bond measure. It also
includes proposed projects for the bond measure in 2018. From the approved 2016 bond
measure, this plan addresses the need to construct: one new middle school (Redmond
Ridge); two new elementary schools (Redmond Ridge East and north Redmond); rebuild
and expand one high school (Juanita High School); and, rebuild and expand two
elementary schools (Kirk and Mead elementary schools). From the proposed 2018 bond
measure, this plan addresses the need to construct: one new elementary school in the
Kirkland area (Kirkland); one new addition at Lake Washington High School (Kirkland);
one new Choice High School in the Redmond/Eastlake area; rebuild and expand one
middle school (Kamiakin, Kirkland); rebuild and expand one elementary school (Alcott
Elementary, King County). These projects are planned to be under construction within the
time period of this plan (i.e. 2016-2021).
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires that the district consider the
environmental impacts of this proposal. The superintendent, as the responsible official of
the school district as lead agency, has determined that the proposed plan will not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The notice of this determination
was published on May 20, 2016 and the comment period ended on June 3, 2016. No
comments were received to date.
The 2016-2021 Capital Facilities Plan proposed that impact fees be established at $10,822
per single-family unit and $956 for each multi-family unit. The single-family fee is an
increase of $1,107 and the multi-family fee is an increase of $104 from last year’s fees. The
increases are due construction inflation costs and increased student generation factor (see
Appendix B and C in the Capital Facilities Plan).
RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors adopts the Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2016-2021, as presented.
‐ 12 ‐ Six-Year Capital Facility Plan
2016 - 2021
Carl Sandburg Elementary
DRAFT: May 18, 2016
Lake Washington School District #414
Serving Redmond, Kirkland, Sammamish, and King County, Washington
Lake Washington School District #414
Serving Redmond, Kirkland, Sammamish, and King County, Washington
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
Nancy Bernard, President
Christopher Carlson, Vice President
Siri Bliesner
Mark Stuart
Eric Laliberte
SUPERINTENDENT
Dr. Traci Pierce
Lake Washington School District’s
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
2016-2021
For information about this plan, call the District Support Services Center
(425.936.1108)
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page Number
I.
Executive Summary
2-4
II.
Six-Year Enrollment Projection and Long Term Planning
5-6
III.
Current District "Standard of Service"
(As Defined by King County Code 21A.06)
7-9
IV.
Inventory and Evaluation of Current Facilities
10
V.
Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan
11-13
VI.
Relocatable and Transitional Classrooms
14-15
VII.
Six-Year Classroom Capacities:
Availability / Deficit Projection
16
VIII.
Impact Fees and Finance Plan
17
IX.
Appendices A - E
X.
Tables 1 - 6
May 18, 2016
Page 1
Lake Washington School District
I.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “plan”) has been prepared by the
Lake Washington School District (the “district”). It is the organization’s
primary facility planning document in compliance with the requirements
of the State of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County
Code 21A.43. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of
2016.
King County was the first jurisdiction in the State of Washington to adopt a
Growth Management Act school impact fee ordinance in 1991 (with fee collection
first becoming effective in 1992). The King County Council adopted the
ordinance, including the school impact fee formula, following a stakeholder
process that included representatives from school districts and the development
community. The adopted formula requires that the calculated fee be reduced by
fifty percent. This discount factor was negotiated as a part of the stakeholder
process. Most cities in King County (and in other areas) adopted the King
County school impact fee formula, including the discount factor, in whole as a
part of their school impact fee ordinances.
In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of King
County, the King County Council must adopt this plan. The cities of
Redmond, Kirkland and Sammamish have each adopted a school impact
fee policy and ordinance similar to the King County model.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local
implementing ordinances, this plan will be updated on an annual basis
with any changes in the fee schedule adjusted accordingly. See Appendix B
for the current single-family calculation and Appendix C for the current
multi-family calculation.
The district’s capital facilities plan establishes a "standard of service" in
order to ascertain current and future capacity. This plan reflects the current
student/teacher standard of service ratio and service model for other
special programs. Future state funding decisions could have an additional
impact on class sizes and facility needs.
While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square
foot guidelines for funding, those guidelines do not account for the local
program needs in the district. The Growth Management Act and King
May 18, 2016
Page 2
Lake Washington School District
I.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Executive Summary (continued)
County Code 21A.43 authorize the district to determine a standard of
service based on the district's specific needs.
The district's current standard provides the following (see Section III for
specific information):
Grade Level
K-1
2-3
4-5
6-8
9-12
Target TeacherStudent Ratio
20 Students
23 Students
27 Students
30 Students
32 Students
School capacity is based on the district standard of service and the existing
inventory of available classrooms, including both permanent and
relocatable (portable) classrooms. As shown in Appendix A, the district's
overall total capacity is 29,239, including permanent capacity of 25,479 and
3,760 in relocatables. Student headcount enrollment as of October 1, 2015
was 27,830.
The district experienced actual growth of 1,114 students in 2015. A six-year
enrollment projection, as required for this plan, is shown in Table 1. During
the six-year window from 2016 to 2021, enrollment is projected to increase
by 3,501 students to a total of 31,331. An additional 814 students are
expected from 2021 to 2023. Growth is projected at all grade levels.
The Lake Washington School District is the fastest growing school district
in King County and one of the fastest growing school districts in the state.
The district went from being the sixth largest school district in the state to
fourth largest in 2015. The most significant growth continues to be in the
Redmond and Kirkland areas. However, growth is also happening in the
Sammamish area and some areas in unincorporated King County.
Enrollment growth has resulted in overcrowding in many district schools.
In December 2014, a Long-Term Facilities Planning Task Force, comprised
of representatives from each of the district’s schools and community
May 18, 2016
Page 3
Lake Washington School District
I.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Executive Summary (continued)
members, was convened to develop recommendations on long-term
facilities planning. From December 2014 to October 2015, this Task Force
and a smaller Working Subcommittee met 20 times to learn about and
have detailed discussions on topics ranging from construction costs to
classroom space usage to facilities funding. In November 2015, the Board
of Directors accepted the recommendations of the Task Force.
The recommendations provide a 15-year framework with the overall
approach to building new schools to address capacity as the priority.
Subsequent to the work of the Task Force, the district proposed a bond
measure for April 2016. Voters approved that bond measure which
includes funding for the following projects:
• A new elementary school in North Redmond with a capacity of 550
students
• A new elementary school in Redmond Ridge East with a capacity of
550
• A new middle school in Redmond Ridge with a capacity for 900
students
• Rebuilding and expanding Juanita High School from a capacity of
1,296 to 1,800 students (an increase of 504 students)
• Rebuilding and expanding Kirk Elementary School for a capacity of
550 based on K-3 class size reduction (an increase of 190 students)
• Rebuilding and expanding Mead Elementary School for a capacity
of 550 based on K-3 class size reduction (an increase of 158 students)
• Repurposing Old Redmond School House to be a preschool building
to free up space at elementary schools
• Rebuilding Explorer Elementary School
In addition, within the six-year window of this plan, the framework of the
long term plan includes a future bond measure proposed for 2018. The
projects anticipated in the 2018 bond include:
• A new elementary school in the Kirkland area
• Rebuild and enlarge Alcott Elementary School
• Rebuild and enlarge Kamiakin Middle School
• An addition and expansion of Lake Washington High School
• A Choice high school in the Eastlake or Redmond areas
• Property for new schools
• A financing plan is included in Section VIII.
May 18, 2016
Page 4
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
II. Six-Year Enrollment Projection and Long Term Planning
Six-Year Enrollment Projection
The district developed long-term enrollment projections to assess facility
capacity needs in preparation for a 2016 bond measure. Based on these
projections the district expects enrollment to increase by over 3,501
students from the 2016 school year through 2021.
The district experienced actual growth of 1,114 students in 2015. A six-year
enrollment projection, as required for this plan, is shown in Table 1. During
the six-year window from 2016 to 2021, enrollment is projected to increase
by 3,501 students resulting in a 12.6% over the current student population.
Growth is expected to significantly impact all grade levels. Enrollment
growth of an additional 814 students is expected through 2023.
Student enrollment projections have been developed using two methods:
(1) cohort survival – which applies historical enrollment trends to the classes
of existing students progressing through the system; and (2) development
tracking – which projects students anticipated from new development. The
cohort survival method was used to determine base enrollments.
Development tracking uses information on known and anticipated
housing development. This method allows the district to more accurately
project student enrollment resulting of new development by school
attendance area.
Cohort Survival
King County live birth data is used to predict future kindergarten
enrollment. Actual King County live births through 2014 are used to
project kindergarten enrollment through the 2019-2020 school year. After
2020, the number of live births is based on King County projections.
Historical data is used to estimate the future number of kindergarten
students that will generate from county births. For other grade levels,
cohort survival trends compare students in a particular grade in one year
to the same group of students in prior years. From this analysis a cohort
survival trend is determined. This trend shows if the cohort of students is
increasing or decreasing in size. This historical trend can then be applied to
predict future enrollment.
May 18, 2016
Page 5
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
II. Six-Year Enrollment Projection and Long Term Planning
(continued)
Development Tracking
In order to ensure the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a
major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking of data of
99 known new housing developments within the district. This information
is obtained from the cities and county and provides the foundation for a
database of known future developments, as well as city and county
housing growth targets. This assures the district’s plan is consistent with
the comprehensive plans of the local permitting jurisdictions. Contact is
made with each developer annually to determine the number of homes to
be built and the anticipated development schedule.
Student Generation Rates
Developments that are near completion, or have been completed, within
the last five years are used to forecast the number of students generated by
new development. District wide statistics show that each new singlefamily home currently generates a 0.437 elementary student, 0.155 middle
school student, and 0.108 senior high student, for a total of 0.700 schoolage child per single family home (see Appendix B). New multi-family
housing units currently generate an average of 0.071 elementary student,
0.014 middle school student, and 0.017 senior high student for a total of
0.102 school age child per multi-family home (see Appendix C). Since 2015
the total of the student generation numbers has increased for both singlefamily developments and multi-family developments. These student
generation factors (see Appendix D) are used to forecast the number of
students expected from the new developments that are planned over the
next six years.
May 18, 2016
Page 6
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
III. Current District “Standard of Service”
King County Code 21A.06 refers to a “standard of service” that each school
district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The
standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number
of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors
determined by the district, which would best serve the student population.
Relocatables (i.e. portable classroom units) may be included in the capacity
calculation using the same standards of service as permanent facilities.
The standard of service outlined below reflects only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the
capacity of the school buildings. The special programs listed below require
classroom space; reducing the total permanent capacity of the buildings
housing these programs. Newer buildings have been constructed to
accommodate some of these programs. Older buildings require additional
reduction of capacity to accommodate these programs. At both the
elementary and secondary levels, the district considers the ability of
students to attend neighborhood schools to be a component of the
standard of service.
The district’s standard of service, for capital planning purposes, and the
projects identified in this plan, include space needed to serve all students
in All Day Kindergarten. Currently, 68% of students participate in the All
Day Kindergarten program. For the 2016-2017 school year, the district will
receive funding to fully implement All Day Kindergarten.
The State also has begun to fund kindergarten through third grade class
size reduction.
Standard of Service for Elementary Students
School capacity at elementary schools is calculated on an average class size
in grades K-5 of 23; based on the following student/teacher staffing ratios:
• Grades K - 1 @ 20:1
• Grades 2 - 3 @ 23:1
• Grades 4-5 @ 27:1
May 18, 2016
Page 7
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
III. Current District “Standard of Service” (continued)
The elementary standard of service includes spaces to accommodate:
• Special Education for students with disabilities which may be served
in a self-contained classroom
• Music instruction provided in a separate classroom
• Art/Science room in modernized schools
• Resource rooms to serve students in:
• Safety New / Remedial programs
• Special Education programs
• English Language Learners (ELL)
• Special Education, Head Start and Ready Start Preschool
• Gifted education (pull-out Quest programs)
Standard of Service for Secondary Students
School capacity at secondary school is based on the follow class size
provisions:
• Class size for grades 6-8 should not exceed 30 students
• Class size for grades 9-12 should not exceed 32 students
In the secondary standard of service model:
• Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a
self-contained classroom
Identified students will also be provided other special educational
opportunities in classrooms designated as follows:
• Resource rooms
• English Language Learners (ELL)
Room Utilization at Secondary Schools
It is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at
secondary schools due to scheduling conflicts for student programs, the
May 18, 2016
Page 8
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
III. Current District “Standard of Service” (continued)
need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers
to have a work space during their planning periods.
The district has determined a standard utilization rate of 70% for nonmodernized secondary schools. For secondary schools that have been
modernized, rebuilt or rebuilt and enlarged, the standard utilization rate is
83%.
May 18, 2016
Page 9
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
IV. Inventory and Evaluation of Current Facilities
As of May 2016, the district has total classrooms of 1,413, including 1,253
permanent classrooms and 160 relocatable classrooms (see Appendix A-1). Eight
additional relocatables are planned to be added in the summer of 2016 for a total
of 168 relocatable classrooms. These classrooms represent a theoretical capacity
to serve 33,468 if all classrooms were only used as general classroom spaces.
However, the district’s standard of service provides for the use of classrooms for
special programs, such as special education, English Language Learners and
Safety Net programs. These programs serve students at much lower student to
teacher ratios than general education classrooms, or serve the same students for a
portion of the day when they are pulled out of the regular classroom.
As a result, the net capacity of these school buildings is adjusted. A total of 201
classroom spaces are used for special programs as shown in Appendix A-2. The
remaining classrooms establish the net available capacity for general education
purposes and represent the district's ability to house projected student
enrollment based on the Standard of Service defined in Section III, Current
District Standard of Service.
After providing space for special programs the district has a net available
classroom capacity to serve 29,239 students. This includes 25,023 in permanent
regular education capacity, 456 for self-contained program capacity and 3,760 in
portable (relocatable) capacity.
Enrollment is expected to increase to 31,331 in 2021 (see Table 1).
The physical condition of the district’s facilities is documented in the 2016
State Study and Survey of School Facilities completed in accordance with
WAC 180-25-025. As schools are modernized or replaced, the State Study
and Survey of School Facilities report is updated. That report is
incorporated herein by reference. In addition, every district facility is
annually evaluated as to condition in accordance with the State Asset
Preservation Program.
May 18, 2016
Page 10
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
V. Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan
Enrollment projections show that enrollment will increase at all grade
spans. Based on the enrollment projections contained in Table 5, student
enrollment is anticipated to reach 31,331 by 2021. The district current
inventory of existing permanent capacity is 25,479. As a result, student
enrollment will exceed permanent capacity by 1,889 students in 2021.
To address existing and future capacity needs, the district contemplates
using the following strategies:
•
•
•
•
•
Construction of new schools
Additions/expansion of an existing high school
Rebuild and enlarge existing schools
Use of relocatables as needed
Boundary adjustments
Construction of new capacity in one area of the district could indirectly
create available capacity at existing schools in other areas of the district
through area specific boundary adjustments. Future updates to this plan
will include specific information regarding adopted strategies.
Strategies to address capacity needs employed over the prior six-year
planning timeline (2010-2015) include:
• Phase II School Modernization (2006-2013) was funded by the voters
in February 2006. The approved bond measure funded the
modernization/replacement of 11 schools throughout the district.
School modernization/replacement projects included the addition of
new student permanent capacity, as needed. The Phase II School
Modernization projects, within the last six years, included:
o Lake Washington High School and Finn Hill Middle School
opened in the fall of 2011
o Muir, Sandburg, and, Keller Elementary Schools opened in the
fall of 2012
o Bell, Rush, and Community Elementary Schools; Rose Hill
Middle School; and International Community School opened
in the fall 2013
May 18, 2016
Page 11
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
V. Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan (continued)
• Additional classrooms were built at Redmond and Eastlake High
Schools, and a new Science, Technology, Engineering and Math
(STEM) high school (Nikola Tesla STEM High School) was built on
the east side of the District. The additions opened in the fall of 2012.
The STEM school was opened in 2012.
• Three boundary adjustments were completed: (1) Due to
overcrowding at Rosa Parks Elementary in Redmond Ridge, a
temporary boundary adjustment was made to reassign some
students from Redmond Ridge East to Wilder Elementary; (2)
Because of overcrowding at Einstein and Rockwell Elementary
Schools a temporary boundary adjustment was conducted to move
unoccupied new developments from those schools to Mann
Elementary; and, (3) District-wide boundary adjustments were
identified in 2014 for implementation in the fall of 2016
• Four additional relocatables were added to Mann Elementary and to
Wilder Elementary in the summer of 2014 to accommodate
additional students.
• Twenty-two relocatable classrooms were added at various locations in the
summer of 2015 (as identified in Section VI) to help relieve capacity issues.
Eight additional portables will be added in 2016 to accommodate
enrollment growth.
• A seven-classroom addition at Redmond Elementary School will be
opened in 2016.
Based on the student enrollment and facility capacity outlined in Table 5,
the district has funding from the April 2016 bond measure to construct the
following projects within the period of this plan including:
• Two new elementary schools: one in Redmond Ridge East (King
•
•
•
•
•
•
County); and one in North Redmond (Redmond)
Rebuilding and expanding Kirk Elementary School (Kirkland)
Rebuilding and expanding Mead Elementary School (Sammamish)
A new middle school in Redmond Ridge (King County)
Rebuilding and expanding Juanita High School (Kirkland)
Upgrading Old Redmond School House for Preschool
Replacing Explorer Elementary with a new modular school
May 18, 2016
Page 12
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
V. Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan (continued)
In addition, within the six-year window of this plan, a 2018 bond measure
is planned. Though not funded at this time, the proposed bond measure is
anticipated to include the following projects:
• One new elementary school (Kirkland)
• One new Choice high school (Eastlake/Redmond area)
• Rebuilding and expanding d Alcott Elementary School (King County)
• Rebuilding and expanding Kamiakin Middle School (Kirkland)
• An addition and expansion of Lake Washington High School
(Kirkland)
• Land purchases for new schools
Completed projects, as shown in Table 5, would result in student
enrollment exceeding permanent capacity by 1,889 students in 2021. Many
district sites are either at or close to maximum relocatable placement.
However, the District may need to purchase and use relocatables to
address capacity needs at sites able to accommodate additional
relocatables.
May 18, 2016
Page 13
Lake Washington School District
VI.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Relocatable and Transitional Classrooms
The district facility inventory includes 160 relocatables (i.e. portable
classroom units). Eight additional relocatables will be installed in the
summer of 2016, bringing the total number to 168 for 2016-2017 school
year. Relocatables provide standard capacity and special program space as
outlined in Section III (see Appendix A).
Relocatable classrooms have been used to address capacity needs in the
following schools:
• In 2010, relocatable classrooms were added to district schools in
Redmond and unincorporated King County
o Redmond area: Rockwell Elementary School – two classrooms, and
Einstein Elementary School – one classroom
o Unincorporated King County area: Rosa Parks Elementary School –
four classrooms
• In 2011, the district placed relocatable classrooms at school sites in
Kirkland, Redmond and unincorporated King County:
o Kirkland area: Lakeview Elementary School – two classrooms, and
Rose Hill Elementary School two classrooms
o Redmond area: Rockwell Elementary School – one classroom and
Redmond Middle School - four classrooms
o Unincorporated King County area: Rosa Parks Elementary School –
two classrooms
• In 2012, the district placed four relocatable classrooms at Redmond
High School. In addition, because of capacity issues, Northstar
Middle School moved from Lake Washington High School into
relocatables units at Emerson High School and Renaissance Middle
School moved from Eastlake High School into relocatables
classrooms on the same campus.
• In 2013, four relocatable classrooms were added to Redmond High
School to support special education program space needs and two
additional relocatable classrooms were placed at Redmond Middle
School.
• In 2014 the district placed an additional ten relocatable classrooms
needed as a result of enrollment growth. Four relocatables were
placed at Mann Elementary School in Redmond and two at
May 18, 2016
Page 14
Lake Washington School District
VI.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Relocatable and Transitional Classrooms (continued)
Redmond Elementary School. Four relocatables were placed at
Wilder Elementary School.
• In 2015 the district added twenty-two portables to address
enrollment growth. These were placed at various schools
throughout the district
• Six at Lake Washington High School (Kirkland)
• Four at Redmond Elementary School (Redmond)
• Three at Alcott Elementary School (King County)
• Three at Rush Elementary School (Redmond)
• Two at Evergreen Middle School (King County)
• One at Audubon Elementary School (Redmond)
• One at Franklin Elementary School (Kirkland)
• One at Frost Elementary School (Kirkland)
• One at Redmond Middle School (Redmond)
• The district will add another eight relocatables to school in the
summer of 2016.
• Four at Lake Washington High School (Kirkland)
• Two at Evergreen Middle School (King County)
• One at Alcott Elementary School (King County)
• One at Keller Elementary School (Kirkland)
The district anticipates relying primarily on new permanent facilities to
serve student enrollment using portables if needed to meet immediate
space needs.
For a definition of relocatables and permanent facilities, see Section 2 of
King County Code 21A.06. As schools are modernized/replaced, permanent
capacity will be added to replace portables currently on school sites to the
extent that enrollment projections indicate a demand for long-term
permanent capacity (see Table 5).
As enrollment fluctuates, relocatables provide flexibility to accommodate
immediate needs and interim housing. Because of this, new school and
modernized school sites are planned for the potential of adding up to four
portables to accommodate the changes in demographics. The use and need
for relocatable classrooms will be balanced against program needs.
May 18, 2016
Page 15
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
VII. Six-Year Classroom Capacities: Availability / Deficit
Projection
Based on the six-year plan, there will be insufficient total capacity to house
anticipated enrollment (see Table 5). As demonstrated in Appendix A, the district
currently has permanent capacity (classroom and special education) to serve
11,523 students at the elementary level, 6,171 students at the middle school level,
and 7,329 students at the high school level. Current enrollment at each grade
level is identified in Appendix A. As depicted in Table 5, the district currently has
insufficient permanent capacity and will continue to have insufficient permanent
capacity due to growth through 2021. Completed projects, as shown in Table 5,
would result in an increased permanent capacity for 3,963 students in 2021, but
increased enrollment results in a deficit capacity of 1,889 students. Relocatable
facilities will be used to address capacity needs that cannot be immediately
served by permanent capacity.
Differing growth patterns throughout the district may cause some
communities to experience overcrowding. This is especially true in
portions of the district where significant housing development has taken
place. A strong residential building market, housing starts, growth and the
number of developments under construction continues to increase. The
continued development of north and northwest Redmond, the recent
increase in development on the Sammamish Plateau and also in the
downtown and Totem Lake areas of Kirkland, plus in-fill and short plats
in multiple municipalities, will put additional pressure on schools in those
areas.
May 18, 2016
Page 16
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
VIII. Impact Fees and the Finance Plan
The school impact fee formula calculates a proportionate share of the costs of
system improvements that are reasonably related to new development. The
formula multiplies the per student costs of site acquisition and construction costs
for new capacity projects by a student generation rate to identify the share per
dwelling unit share of the facilities that are needed to serve new growth. (The
student generation rate is the average number of students generated by dwelling
unit type – new single family and multi-family dwelling units.) The formula then
provides a credit against the calculated costs per dwelling unit for any School
Construction Assistance Program funding that the District expects to receive for
a new capacity project from the State of Washington and for the estimated taxes
that a new homeowner will pay toward the debt service on school construction
bonds. The calculated fee (see Appendix B and Appendix C) is then discounted, as
required by ordinance, by fifty percent.
For the purposes of this plan and the impact fee calculations, the actual
construction cost data from recently completed projects (Sandburg
Elementary School, opened in 2012; Rose Hill Middle School, opened in
2013; and Lake Washington High School, opened in 2011) have been used
(see Appendix E).
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Lake
Washington School District plans to finance improvements for the years
2016 through 2021. The financing components include secured and
unsecured funding. The plan is based on future bond approval, securing
state construction funding assistance and collection of impact fees under
the State’s Growth Management Act. Voluntary mitigation fees paid
pursuant to Washington State’s Environmental Policy Act may be collected
from developments subject to mitigation agreements executed before some
jurisdictions adopted GMA school impact fee ordinances.
May 18, 2016
Page 17
Lake Washington School District
IX.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Appendices
Appendices A1-2: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools,
Middle Schools, and Senior High Schools
Appendix B:
Calculations of Impact Fees for Single Family
Residences
Appendix C:
Calculations of Impact Fees for Multi-Family
Residences
Appendix D:
Student Generation Factor Calculations
Appendices E1-3: Calculation Back-Up
May 18, 2016
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Calculations of Capacities for
Elementary, Middle, and High Schools
TOTAL ALL CLASSROOMS
Elementary
Schools
ALCOTT
AUDUBON
BELL
BLACKWELL
CARSON
COMMUNITY
DICKINSON
DISCOVERY
EINSTEIN
EXPLORER
FRANKLIN
FROST
JUANITA
KELLER
KIRK
LAKEVIEW
MANN
MCAULIFFE
MEAD
MUIR
REDMOND
ROCKWELL
ROSA PARKS
ROSE HILL
RUSH
SANDBURG
SMITH
THOREAU
TWAIN
WILDER
Totals
Number of Classrooms
Permanent Portable
Total
26
22
27
24
23
3
23
3
24
3
23
24
23
21
22
22
22
23
25
23
24
25
27
24
28
25
26
22
26
23
656
11
3
0
3
4
0
4
0
1
1
3
1
0
0
3
4
4
7
6
0
8
5
10
2
3
0
8
0
4
8
103
37
25
27
27
27
3
27
3
25
4
26
25
23
21
25
26
26
30
31
23
32
30
37
26
31
25
34
22
30
31
759
Number of Classrooms
Middle
Permanent Portable
Total
Schools
ENVIRONMENTAL****
5
0
5
EVERGREEN
35
11
46
FINN HILL****
28
0
28
INGLEWOOD
55
0
55
INTERNATIONAL ****
21
0
21
KAMIAKIN
30
7
37
KIRKLAND****
25
0
25
NORTHSTAR
0
4
4
REDMOND ****
37
7
44
RENAISSANCE
0
4
4
ROSE HILL ****
41
0
41
STELLA SCHOLA
3
0
3
Totals
280
33
313
Number of Classrooms
Senior High
Permanent Portable
Total
Schools
EMERSON HIGH
10
2
12
EASTLAKE
93
0
93
FUTURES
3
0
3
JUANITA
55
8
63
LAKE WASHINGTON***
59
6
65
REDMOND ****
73
8
81
TESLA STEM ****
24
0
24
Totals
317
24
341
TOTAL DISTRICT
1253
160
Permanent
1413
Capacity
Percent
83%
83%
83%
70%
83%
70%
83%
70%
83%
70%
83%
83%
9
Capacity
Percent
70%
70%
70%
83%
83%
83%
83%
Capacity
Portable
23 x Classrooms
598
506
621
552
529
69
529
69
552
69
529
552
529
483
506
506
506
529
575
529
552
575
621
552
644
575
598
506
598
529
23 x Portables
253
69
0
69
92
0
92
0
23
23
69
23
0
0
69
92
92
161
138
0
184
115
230
46
69
0
184
0
92
184
15,088
2,369
Permanent
Capacity
Portable
Total
851
575
621
621
621
69
621
69
575
92
598
575
529
483
575
598
598
690
713
529
736
690
851
598
713
575
782
506
690
713
17,457
Total
(30 x Capacity %) (30 x Capacity %)
125
872
697
1,155
523
630
623
0
921
0
1,021
75
6,642
Permanent
0
274
0
0
0
147
0
84
174
84
0
0
763
Capacity
Portable
125
1,146
697
1,155
523
777
623
84
1,095
84
1,021
75
7,405
Total
(32 x Capacity %) (32 x Capacity %)
224
2,083
67
1,461
1,567
1,939
637
7,978
45
0
0
212
159
212
0
628
269
2,083
67
1,673
1,726
2,151
637
8,606
29,708
3,760
33,468
Key:
Total Enrollment on this chart does not include Emerson K-12, contractual, transition and WANIC students
Self-contained rooms have a capacity of 12
Non-modernized secondary schools have standard capacity of 70%
****Modernized secondary schools have standard capacity of 83%
May 18, 2016
Appendix A-1
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Calculations of Capacities for
Elementary, Middle, and High Schools
SPECIAL PROGRAM CLASSROOMS USED
Elementary
Schools
ALCOTT
AUDUBON
BELL
BLACKWELL
CARSON
COMMUNITY
DICKINSON
DISCOVERY
EINSTEIN
EXPLORER
FRANKLIN
FROST
JUANITA
KELLER
KIRK
LAKEVIEW
MANN
MCAULIFFE
MEAD
MUIR
REDMOND
ROCKWELL
ROSA PARKS
ROSE HILL
RUSH
SANDBURG
SMITH
THOREAU
TWAIN
WILDER
Totals
Permanent
Classrooms
26
22
27
24
23
3
23
3
24
3
23
24
23
21
22
22
22
23
25
23
24
25
27
24
28
25
26
22
26
23
656
Self Resource
Cont. Rooms
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
2
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
3
0
1
2
2
2
1
0
2
0
3
2
3
0
2
0
2
2
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
2
2
2
0
2
17
55
ELL
Rooms
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
19
5
35
28
55
21
30
25
0
37
0
41
3
280
Self Resource
Cont. Rooms
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
2
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
9
8
ELL
Rooms
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
10
93
3
55
59
73
24
317
Self Resource
Cont. Rooms
0
2
3
5
0
0
4
3
2
1
3
0
0
0
12
11
ELL
Rooms
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
Number of Classrooms
Computer Music
Pre-School
Labs
Rooms
0
0
2
0
0
1
4
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
15
0
31
NET AVAILABLE CAPACITY
Arts/Sci
Rooms
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
15
Pull-out
Quest
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
Number of Classrooms
Net
Permanent
Portable
21
11
17
3
18
0
17
3
20
4
3
0
16
4
3
0
19
1
3
1
17
3
18
1
15
0
14
0
18
3
18
4
16
4
19
7
20
6
16
0
17
8
21
5
21
10
17
2
22
3
19
0
20
8
18
0
19
4
19
8
501
103
Net Permanent
Classroom
483
391
414
391
460
69
368
69
437
69
391
414
345
322
414
414
368
437
460
368
391
483
483
391
506
437
460
414
437
437
11,523
Self
Contained
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
0
24
12
0
24
0
0
24
24
0
0
24
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
24
0
204
Portable
Capacity
253
69
0
69
92
0
92
0
23
23
69
23
0
0
69
92
92
161
138
0
184
115
230
46
69
0
184
0
92
184
2,369
Net Permanent Portable Net Permanent
Classroom
Classrooms Classrooms
5
0
125
31
11
772
27
0
672
51
0
1,071
21
0
523
27
7
567
23
0
573
0
4
0
35
7
872
0
4
0
37
0
921
3
0
75
260
33
6,171
Self
Contained
0
24
0
24
0
12
24
0
12
0
12
0
108
Portable
Capacity
0
274
0
0
0
147
0
84
174
84
0
0
763
Net Permanent Portable Net Classroom
Permanent
Classrooms Classrooms
8
2
179
85
0
1,904
3
0
67
47
8
1,248
55
6
1,461
69
8
1,833
24
0
637
291
24
7,329
Self
Contained
0
36
0
48
24
36
0
144
Portable
Capacity
45
0
0
212
159
212
0
628
456
3,760
ENROLLMENT
Total
Oct 2015
736
460
414
460
552
69
484
69
460
92
484
449
345
346
483
506
484
622
598
368
599
598
713
461
575
437
644
414
553
621
14,096
755
568
376
516
418
71
471
71
441
73
516
411
352
367
528
516
468
514
600
399
551
624
665
395
532
483
617
349
552
600
13,799
Total
Oct 2015
125
1,070
672
1,095
523
726
597
84
1,058
84
933
75
7,042
140
1,021
589
1,154
438
552
571
90
1,004
96
786
90
6,531
Total
Oct 2015
224
1,940
67
1,508
1,644
2,081
637
8,101
70
1,611
55
1,432
1,496
1,753
562
6,979
29,239
27,309
Number of Classrooms
Middle
Schools
ENVIRONMENTAL****
EVERGREEN
FINN HILL****
INGLEWOOD
INTERNATIONAL ****
KAMIAKIN
KIRKLAND****
NORTHSTAR
REDMOND ****
RENAISSANCE
ROSE HILL ****
STELLA SCHOLA
Totals
Number of Classrooms
Senior High
Schools
EMERSON HIGH
EASTLAKE
FUTURES
JUANITA
LAKE WASHINGTON**
REDMOND ****
TESLA STEM ****
Totals
TOTAL DISTRICT
1,253
38
74
25
15
0
31
15
3
1,052
160
25,023
Key:
Key:
Total Enrollment on this Total Enrollment on this chart does not include Emerson K-12, contractual, transition and WANIC students
Self-contained rooms haSelf-contained rooms have a capacity of 12
Non-modernized secondNon-modernized secondary schools have standard capacity of 70%
****Modernized seconda****Modernized secondary schools have standard capacity of 83%
May 18, 2016
Appendix A-2
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Estimated School Impact Fee Calculation
Based on King County Code 21.A.43
Single Family Residence ("SFR")
School Site Acquisition Cost:
Facility
Acreage
Elementary
Middle
Senior
10
20
40
Cost/
Acre
$0
$0
$0
Facility
Size
550
900
1800
Site Cost/
Student
Student
Factor
$0
$0
$0
Cost/
SFR
0.4370
0.1550
0.1080
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$0
School Construction Cost:
Percent
Permanent
Elementary
Middle
Senior
90%
90%
90%
Construction
Cost
$23,854,050
$47,290,267
$88,763,400
Facility
Size
550
900
1800
Bldg. Cost/
Student
Student
Factor
$39,034
$47,290
$44,382
0.4370
0.1550
0.1080
TOTAL
Cost/
SFR
$17,058
$7,330
$4,793
$29,181
Temporary Facility Cost:
Percent
Temporary
Elementary
Middle
Senior
10%
10%
10%
Construction
Cost
$225,000
$225,000
$225,000
Facility
Size
23
30
32
Bldg. Cost/
Student
Student
Factor
$978
$750
$703
Cost/
SFR
0.4370
0.1550
0.1080
$428
$116
$76
TOTAL
$620
State Assistance Credit Calculation:
Elementary
Middle
Senior
Const Cost
Allocation
Sq. Ft./
Student
Funding
Assistance
213.23
213.23
213.23
90.0
117.0
130.0
24.68%
24.68%
24.68%
Credit/
Student
Student
Factor
$4,736
$6,157
$6,841
0.4370
0.1550
0.1080
TOTAL
May 18, 2018
Cost/
SFR
$2,070
$954
$739
$3,763
Appendix B
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Estimated School Impact Fee Calculation
Based on King County Code 21.A.43
Single Family Residence ("SFR")
Tax Payment Credit Calculation:
Average SFR Assessed Value
Current Capital Levy Rate (2016)/$1000
Annual Tax Payment
Years Amortized
Current Bond Interest Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
$638,114
$0.82
$522.23
10
3.27%
$4,394
Impact Fee Summary for Single Family Residence:
Site Acquisition Cost
Permanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Assistance Credit
Tax Payment Credit
$0
$29,181
$620
($3,763)
($4,394)
Sub-Total
$21,644
50% Local Share
$10,822
SFR Impact Fee
$10,822
May 18, 2018
Appendix B
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Estimated School Impact Fee Calculation
Based on King County Code 21.A.43
Multiple Family Residence ("MFR")
School Site Acquisition Cost:
Facility
Acreage
Elementary
Middle
Senior
Cost/
Acre
10
20
40
$0
$0
$0
Facility
Size
550
900
1800
Site Cost/
Student
Student
Factor
$0
$0
$0
0.0710
0.0140
0.0170
TOTAL
Cost/
MFR
$0
$0
$0
$0
School Construction Cost:
Percent
Permanent
Elementary
Middle
Senior
Construction
Cost
90%
90%
90%
$23,854,050
$47,290,267
$88,763,400
Facility
Size
550
900
1800
Bldg. Cost/
Student
Student
Factor
$39,034
$47,290
$44,382
0.0710
0.0140
0.0170
TOTAL
Cost/
MFR
$2,771
$662
$754
$4,188
Temporary Facility Cost:
Percent
Temporary
Elementary
Middle
Senior
Construction
Cost
10%
10%
10%
$225,000
$225,000
$225,000
Facility
Size
23
30
32
Bldg. Cost/
Student
Student
Factor
$978
$750
$703
0.0710
0.0140
0.0170
TOTAL
Cost/
MFR
$69
$11
$12
$92
State Assistance Credit Calculation:
Elementary
Middle
Senior
Const Cost
Allocation
Sq. Ft./
Student
Funding
Assistance
213.23
213.23
213.23
90.0
117.0
130.0
24.68%
24.68%
24.68%
Credit/
Student
Student
Factor
$4,736
$6,157
$6,841
0.0710
0.0140
0.0170
TOTAL
May 18, 2016
Cost/
MFR
$336
$86
$116
$539
Appendix C
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Estimated School Impact Fee Calculation
Based on King County Code 21.A.43
Multiple Family Residence ("MFR")
Tax Payment Credit Calculation:
Average MFR Assessed Value
Current Capital Levy Rate (2016)/$1000
Annual Tax Payment
Years Amortized
Current Bond Interest Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
$265,741
$0.82
$217.48
10
3.27%
$1,830
Impact Fee Summary for Single Family Residence:
Site Acquisition Cost
Permanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Assistance Credit
Tax Payment Credit
Sub-Total
$0
$4,188
$92
($539)
($1,830)
$1,911
50% Local Share
$956
MFR Impact Fee
$956
May 18, 2016
Appendix C
2016 MITIGATION DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Five Year History
SI NGL E FAM I L Y DEVEL OPM ENTS
Ashford Chase
Brauerwood Estates
Brookside at The Woodlands
Chatham Ridge
Glenshire at English Hill Div I
Glenshire at English Hill Div II
Gramercy Park
Greenbriar Estates
Greystone Manor I
Harmon Ridge
Hazelwood
Highland Ridge
Illahee Tract M
Inglewood Place
Lakeshore Estates
Lakeview Lane
Mondavio/Verona I/Vistas I
Panorama Estates
Park Ridge
Pine Meadows
Prescott at English Hill
Redmond Ridge East
Reserve at Patterson Creek
Sable & Aspen Ridge
Sequoia Ridge
Stirling Manor
Summer Grove I & II
Sycamore Park
The Crossings
The Retreat
The Rise
Vintner's Ridge
Wexford at English Hill
Willowmere Park
Wisti Lane
Woodlands Ridge
Woodlands West
CITY/
#
COUNTY PLANNED
S
38
S
33
R
22
K
15
R
28
R
16
S
28
S
58
R
91
K
12
R
76
K
18
S
16
S
21
R
17
K
29
R
80
K
18
R
51
S
26
R
70
KC
665
KC
29
R
30
R
14
S
16
K
38
R
12
R
18
R
14
R
23
K
51
R
16
R
53
K
18
R
25
R
74
Lake Washington School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
#
COMPL.
38
33
22
15
28
16
28
58
89
12
76
18
16
21
17
29
69
16
51
26
70
665
27
30
14
16
38
12
18
14
18
48
16
29
18
25
74
#
OCCUP.
38
33
22
15
28
16
28
58
87
12
76
18
16
21
17
29
59
16
51
26
70
665
27
30
14
16
38
12
18
14
13
44
16
29
18
25
74
May 18, 2016
2016 STUDENTS
ELEM MIDDLE SENIOR
16
4
3
19
6
4
3
12
1
7
1
2
5
0
3
4
3
3
22
6
5
50
21
11
47
10
2
4
0
0
13
9
10
1
1
2
9
3
2
9
4
4
4
1
1
2
0
1
27
14
13
3
0
0
20
3
6
13
3
2
25
10
7
365
131
64
11
6
5
5
3
4
10
2
1
9
7
5
2
0
4
0
0
0
16
5
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
11
3
2
6
1
5
12
3
1
3
3
0
2
3
5
17
8
10
TOTAL
23
29
16
10
8
10
33
82
59
4
32
4
14
17
6
3
54
3
29
18
42
560
22
12
13
21
6
0
26
1
1
16
12
16
6
10
35
2016 RATIO
ELEM MIDDLE SENIOR TOTAL
0.421
0.105
0.079
0.605
0.879
0.576
0.182
0.121
0.545
0.136
0.045
0.727
0.467
0.067
0.133
0.667
0.179
0.000
0.107
0.286
0.250
0.188
0.188
0.625
0.786
0.214
0.179
1.179
0.862
0.362
0.190
1.414
0.540
0.115
0.023
0.678
0.333
0.000
0.000
0.333
0.171
0.118
0.132
0.421
0.056
0.056
0.111
0.222
0.563
0.188
0.125
0.875
0.429
0.190
0.190
0.810
0.235
0.059
0.059
0.353
0.069
0.000
0.034
0.103
0.458
0.237
0.220
0.915
0.188
0.000
0.000
0.188
0.392
0.059
0.118
0.569
0.500
0.115
0.077
0.692
0.357
0.143
0.100
0.600
0.549
0.197
0.096
0.842
0.407
0.222
0.185
0.815
0.167
0.100
0.133
0.400
0.714
0.143
0.071
0.929
0.563
0.438
0.313
1.313
0.053
0.000
0.105
0.158
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.889
0.278
0.278
1.444
0.071
0.000
0.000
0.071
0.000
0.077
0.000
0.077
0.250
0.068
0.045
0.364
0.375
0.063
0.313
0.750
0.414
0.103
0.034
0.552
0.167
0.167
0.000
0.333
0.080
0.120
0.200
0.400
0.230
0.108
0.135
0.473
Appendix D
2016 MITIGATION DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Five Year History
TOTALS
M UL TI -FAM I L Y DEVEL OPM ENTS
Allez Apartments
Elan Apartments
Francis Village
Graystone Condos
Kempin Meadows Condos
Kirkland Commons
Kirkland Crossing Apartments
Plateau 228
Red 160 Apartments
Redmond Ridge East Duplex
Redmond Square Apartments
Slater 116 Condos
The Ondine
The Rise
Velocity Apartments
Villas @ Mondavia
Waterscape
TOTALS
1,859
CITY/
COUNTY
R
R
K
R
KC
K
K
S
R
KC
R
K
K
R
K
R
K
1,810
1,789
# OF % OCCUP/
UNITS # COMPL.
148
98%
134
95%
61
61
16
16
58
58
15
15
185
98%
71
71
250
96%
135
26
156
94%
108
108
102
102
38
20
58
100%
84
84
196
96%
#
OCCUP.
145
127
61
16
58
15
181
71
241
26
147
108
93
20
58
84
188
1,815
Lake Washington School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
1,639
May 18, 2016
782
193
1,253
2016 STUDENTS
ELEM MIDDLE SENIOR
1
4
0
1
0
0
5
3
2
1
1
0
10
2
2
2
0
1
4
3
2
18
2
5
0
0
1
2
0
2
17
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
17
5
6
20
5
3
10
1
2
TOTAL
5
1
10
2
14
3
9
25
1
4
18
0
1
5
28
28
13
116
278
23
28
167
0.437
0.155
0.108
0.700
2016 STUDENTS
ELEM MIDDLE SENIOR TOTAL
0.028
0.007
0.000
0.034
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.008
0.082
0.049
0.033
0.164
0.063
0.063
0.000
0.125
0.172
0.034
0.034
0.241
0.133
0.000
0.067
0.200
0.022
0.017
0.011
0.050
0.254
0.028
0.070
0.352
0.000
0.000
0.004
0.004
0.077
0.000
0.077
0.154
0.116
0.000
0.007
0.122
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.011
0.200
0.000
0.050
0.250
0.293
0.086
0.103
0.483
0.238
0.060
0.036
0.333
0.053
0.005
0.011
0.069
0.071
0.014
0.017
0.102
Appendix D
Lake Washington School District
Sandburg Elementary School
598 student capacity *
Cost
Construction Cost
(bid 2011, actual const. costs)
$21,720,911
Projected Construction Cost in
2017 @ 550 student capacity @
3% per year
$25,935,903
Size
Comparison
Capacity
Adjustment
598 students
2011 construction cost
2017 projected cost,
adjusted for capacity difference
Cost
Adjustment
May 18, 2016
2016-2021 Capital Facilities Plan
Construction Cost
(bid 2011, actual const. costs)
Projected Construction Cost in
2017 @ 550 student capacity
Future Elementary School
550 student capacity
550 students
(all-day kindergarten, and reduced
class size grades k-3)
$36,323 per student space
(based on 2012 construction costs,
$21,720,911 / 598 students)
$43,371 per student space
(based on 2017 projected costs,
$25,935,903 / 598 students
$43,371 per student space x 550
students = $23,854,050
(based on 2017 projected costs)
$21,720,911
$23,854,050
Appendix E1
Lake Washington School District
2016-2021 Capital Facilities Plan
Rose Hill Middle School
900 student capacity
Cost
Construction Cost (bid 2012)
Projected Construction Cost in
2017 @ 3% per year
Future Middle School
900 student capacity
$40,793,000
$47,290,267
Size
Comparison
Capacity
Adjustment
2012 construction cost
2017 projected cost,
no capacity difference
Cost
Adjustment
Construction Cost (bid 2012)
Projected Construction Cost in
2017 @ 900 student capacity
May 18, 2016
900 students
900 students
$45,325 per student space
(based on 2012 construction costs,
$40,793,000 / 900 students)
$52,545 per student space
(based on 2017 projected costs,
$47,290,267 / 900 students)
$52,545 per student space
(based on 2017 projected costs,
$47,290,267 / 900 students)
$40,793,000
$47,290,267
Appendix E2
Lake Washington School District
2016-2021 Capital Facilities Plan
Lake Washington High School
1,567 student capacity
Cost
Construction Cost 2009
$61,000,000
Projected Construction Cost in
2017 @ 3% per year
$77,272,975
Future High School
1,800 student capacity
Size
Comparison
1,567 students
Capacity
Adjustment
Cost
Adjustment
2009 construction cost
$38,928 per student space
(based on 2009 construction costs,
$61,000,000 / 1,567 students)
2017 projected cost,
adjusted for capacity difference
$49,313 per student space
(based on 2017 construction costs,
$77,272,975 / 1,567 students)
Construction Cost 2009
Projected Construction Cost in
2017 @ 1,800 student capacity
May 18, 2016
1,800 students
$49,313 per student space
x 1,800 students = $88,763,400
based on 2017 projected costs)
$61,000,000
$88,763,400
Appendix E3
Lake Washington School District
X.
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
TABLES
Table 1:
Six-Year Enrollment Projections
Table 2:
Enrollment History
Table 3:
Inventory and Capacities of Existing Schools
Table 4:
Inventory of Undeveloped Land
Table 4a:
Map
Table 5:
Projected Capacity to House Students
Table 6:
Six-Year Finance Plan
May 18, 2016
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Six-Year Enrollment Projections
2015*
County Live Births**
change
Kindergarten ***
Grade 1 ****
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
24,514
2,199
2,292
2,405
2,363
2,315
2,258
2,213
2,114
2,002
1,998
1,966
1,779
1,926
2017
2018
24,910
2019
2020
2021
24,630
25,032
25,348
25,415
25,482
116
402
(122)
438
67
67
2,216
2,413
2,420
2,404
2,368
2,314
2,220
2,163
2,061
1,982
2,001
2,032
1,938
2,271
2,437
2,551
2,427
2,420
2,376
2,290
2,176
2,111
2,039
1,992
2,082
2,184
2,290
2,503
2,576
2,561
2,441
2,431
2,356
2,249
2,127
2,085
2,048
2,077
2,233
2,339
2,512
2,630
2,574
2,567
2,439
2,380
2,310
2,197
2,090
2,090
2,126
2,227
2,342
2,554
2,632
2,621
2,573
2,563
2,391
2,323
2,250
2,148
2,092
2,166
2,272
2,345
2,552
2,673
2,622
2,618
2,568
2,537
2,335
2,257
2,196
2,149
2,168
2,311
28,532
29,356
29,977
30,481
30,927
31,331
Yearly Increase
702
824
621
504
446
404
Yearly Increase
2.52%
2.89%
2.12%
1.68%
1.46%
1.31%
Total Enrollment
Cumulative Increase
27,830
2016
702
1,526
2,147
2,651
3,097
3,501
* Number of Individual Students (10/1/15 Headcount).
** County Live Births estimated based on OFM projections. 2019 and prior year birth rates are
actual births 5 years prior to enrollment year.
*** Kindergarten enrollment is calculated at 8.11% of County Live Births plus anticipated developments.
**** First Grade enrollment is based on District's past history of first grade enrollment to prior year
kindergarten enrollment.
.
May 18, 2016
Table 1
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Enrollment History *
2006
County Live Births **
Kindergarten / Live Birth
2007
2008
2009
2010
21,778 21,863 22,431 22,874 22,680
8.21%
7.76%
7.95%
8.15%
8.25%
2011
2013
2014
2015
24,244 24,899 25,222
25,057
24,514
8.02%
8.97%
Period Average
8.11%
7.87%
2012
7.86%
8.08%
Kindergarten
1,789
1,696
1,783
1,865
1,872
1,908
1,957
2,037
2,009
2,199
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
1,916
1,860
1,870
1,776
1,810
1,959
1,901
1,853
1,857
1,753
1,903
2,020
1,934
1,901
1,854
2,047
1,936
2,036
1,937
1,897
2,146
2,108
1,968
2,056
1,936
2,121
2,203
2,116
1,986
2,051
2,150
2,174
2,207
2,125
2,003
2,218
2,228
2,236
2,231
2,137
2,292
2,284
2,270
2,258
2,257
2,292
2,405
2,363
2,315
2,258
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
1,726
1,818
1,806
1,825
1,692
1,811
1,738
1,805
1,673
1,838
1,726
1,819
1,898
1,829
1,734
1,920
1,857
1,831
2,002
1,929
1,860
1,979
2,047
1,924
2,123
2,023
2,053
2,213
2,114
2,002
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
1,765
1,824
1,856
1,881
1,755
1,763
1,811
1,890
1,782
1,739
1,728
1,909
1,660
1,780
1,742
1,802
1,756
1,672
1,798
1,816
1,687
1,740
1,671
1,824
1,802
1,714
1,730
1,742
1,868
1,795
1,649
1,699
1,933
1,853
1,727
1,634
1,998
1,966
1,779
1,926
24,915 25,395 26,048
26,716
27,830
Total Enrollment
Yearly Change
* October 1st Headcount
** Number indicates actual births
5 years prior to enrollment year.
May 18, 2016
23,697 23,566 23,769 24,085 24,589
(131)
203
316
504
326
480
653
668
Average increase in the number of students per year
Total increase for period
Percentage increase for period
Average yearly increase
1,114
459
4,133
17%
1.94%
Table 2
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
2015-16 Inventory and Capacities of Existing Schools
*
Juanita Area
Address
25 Frost Elementary
11801 NE 140th
03 Juanita Elementary
9635 NE 132nd
04 Keller Elementary
13820 108th NE
26 Muir Elementary
14012 132nd NE
06 Discovery Community
12801 84th NE
06 Sandburg Elementary
12801 84th NE
02 Thoreau Elementary
8224 NE 138th
60 Environmental & Adventure
8040 NE 132nd
63 Finn Hill Middle School
8040 NE 132nd
67 Kamiakin Middle School
14111 132nd NE
82 Futures School
10601 NE 132nd
82 Juanita High School
10601 NE 132nd
Kirkland Area
07 Bell Elementary
11212 NE 112th
96 Community School
11133 NE 65th
16 Franklin Elementary
12434 NE 60th
09 Kirk Elementary
1312 6th Street
10 Lakeview Elementary
10400 NE 68th
15 Rose Hill Elementary
8044 128th NE
18 Rush Elementary
6101 152nd NE
14 Twain Elementary
9525 130th NE
96 International Community Schoo11133 NE 65th
65 Kirkland Middle School
430 18th Avenue
80 Northstar Middle School
12033 NE 80th
69 Rose Hill Middle School
13505 NE 75th
61 Stella Schola Middle School
13505 NE 75th
80 Emerson High
10903 NE 53rd St
84 Lake Washington High
12033 NE 80th
Redmond Area
53 Alcott Elementary
4213 228th NE
19 Audubon Elementary
3045 180th NE
46 Dickinson Elementary
7040 208th NE
24 Einstein Elementary
18025 NE 116th
46 Explorer Community School
7040 208th NE
22 Mann Elementary
17001 NE 104th
23 Redmond Elementary
16800 NE 80th
21 Rockwell Elementary
11125 162nd NE
41 Rosa Parks Elementary
22845 NE Cedar Park Cresen
32 Wilder Elementary
22130 NE 133rd
74 Evergreen Middle School
6900 208th NE
71 Redmond Middle School
10055 166th NE
85 Redmond High School
17272 NE 104th
73 Tesla STEM High School
400 228th Ave NE
Sammamish Area
54 Blackwell Elementary
3225 205th PL NE
52 Carson Elementary
1035 244th Ave NE
57 McAuliffe Elementary
23823 NE 22nd
58 Mead Elementary
1725 216th NE
56 Smith Elementary
23305 NE 14th
77 Inglewood Middle School
24120 NE 8th
86 Renaissance
400 228th NE
86 Eastlake High School
400 228TH NE
Total
Net Avail
Capacity** Capacity**
575
449
529
345
483
346
529
368
69
69
575
437
506
414
125
125
697
672
777
726
67
67
1,673
1,508
621
69
598
575
598
598
713
690
523
623
84
1,021
75
269
1,726
414
69
484
483
506
461
575
553
523
597
84
933
75
224
1,644
851
575
621
575
92
598
736
690
851
713
1,146
1,095
2,151
637
736
460
484
460
92
484
599
598
713
621
1,070
1,058
2,081
637
621
621
690
713
782
1,155
84
2,083
460
552
622
598
644
1,095
84
1,940
* Note: See Table 4a for District Map. Locations indicated by numbers stated in this column.
** Note: ""Total Capacity" =
"Net Available Capacity" =
Total permanent/portable capacity as constructed
(Total Capacity does not account for space used by special programs)
Total Capacity minus uses for special programs
(Net Available Capacity accounts for space used by special programs)
May 18, 2016
Table 3
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Inventory of Undeveloped Land
Site
#*
Area
Address
Jurisdiction
Status
10638 – 134th Ave. NE
Redmond
In reserve ***
172nd NE & NE 122nd
Redmond Ridge East
194th NE above NE 116th
King County
King County
King County
In reserve
In reserve
*****
Main & 228th NE
22000 Novelty Hill Road
Redmond Ridge
Corporate Center
NE 95th & 195th NE
Sammamish
King County
King County
In reserve ***
In reserve ***
In reserve
King County
*****
NE 95th Street & 173rd Place NE
22821 Redmond-Fall City Road
King County
King County
In reserve ***
In reserve ***
Juanita Area
None
Kirkland Area
27
Elementary
28
31
33
Elementary School
Elementary School
No School Use
Allowed
Elementary School
Undetermined
Middle School
Redmond Area
59
75
72
90
No School Use
Allowed
Undetermined
Bus Satellite
91
99
Footnotes
“*” = See Table 4a for a District map. Locations indicated by numbers stated in this column.
“***” = “In reserve” refers to sites owned by the District. While the District does not
anticipate construction school facilities on these sites within these six years, they are
being held for the District’s long term needs.
“*****” = Property unable to be used for a school site due to the King County School Siting
Task Force recommendations as adopted by the King County Council.
The King County Rural Area Task Force concluded:
1.
2.
3.
4.
May 18, 2016
"Lake Washington 2" (Site 75): 37.85 acre site located on the north side of
Novelty Hill Road & adjacent to south boundary of Redmond Ridge. The
District must work with King County to find an alternative site within the
UGA. If an alternative site cannot be feasibly located, the District can use the
site for a "small [5 acre] environmental school while placing the remainder of
the use into permanent conservation."
"Lake Washington 4": Existing undeveloped acreage at Dickinson/Evergreen
site - this acreage be used for school development and can connect to sewer.
"Lake Washington 1 (Site 33)": 19.97 acres located 1/4 mile east of Avondale
Road - no school use allowed; potential conservation value.
"Lake Washington 3" (Site 90): 26.86 acres located 1/4 mile south of Novelty
Hill Road and 1/2 mile east of Redmond City Limits - no school use allowed.
Table 4
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facility Plan 2016-2021
Growth Management Boundary Shown as Dashed Line
May 18, 2016
Table 4a
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Projected Capacity to House Students^
2015
Permanent Capacity
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
25,479
New Construction*:
Redmond Ridge East Elementary #31
North Redmond Elementary #28
Kirk Elementary School #09
Redmond Ridge Middle School #72
Mead Elementary School #58
** New Lake Washington/Juanita Area Elementary
** Lake Washington High School Addition
*** New Eastside Choice High School
550
550
190
900
158
550
233
Modernization / Rebuild and Expansion
Redmond Elementary Addition #23
Juanita High School #82
** Alcott Elementary School #53
*** Kamiakin Middle School #67
138
504
190
Permanent Capacity Subtotal
25,479
25,617
25,617
26,717
27,965
29,252
29,442
Total Enrollment
27,830
28,532
29,356
29,977
30,481
30,927
31,331
Permanent Surplus/(Deficit) without Projects
(2,351)
(2,915)
(3,739)
(4,360)
(4,864)
(5,310)
(5,714)
Permanent Surplus / (Deficit) with Projects
(2,351)
(2,915)
(3,739)
(3,260)
(2,516)
(1,675)
(1,889)
* New schools and additional permanent capacity through modernization / rebuild (replacement)
** Projects that are not funded (without these projects, the deficit with projects would be -2,862)
*** These projects are anticipated to be under construction, but not completed within the six year window of this plan
^ Does not include relocatable capacity
May 18, 2015
Table 5
Lake Washington School District
Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2021
Six-Year Finance Plan
Fiscal Year *
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Total
Est Secured
State
Local ^
2016 Bond Projects (voter approved)
Site 31
New - Redmond Ridge East Elementary
8,404,835
33,753,437
1,098,728
43,257,000
43,257,000
Site 28
New - North Redmond Elementary
8,404,835
33,753,437
1,098,728
43,257,000
43,257,000
Site 09
Rebuild/Enlarge - Kirk Elementary
971,719
7,769,255
35,107,855
1,138,171
44,987,000
3,000,000
41,987,000
Site 58
Rebuild/Enlarge - Mead Elementary
971,719
7,769,255
35,107,855
1,138,171
44,987,000
3,000,000
41,987,000
Site 72
New - Redmond Area Middle School
6,688,430
38,260,615
31,308,372
1,334,582
77,592,000
Site 82
Rebuild/Enlarge - Juanita High School
7,099,278
13,893,054
36,514,727
71,443,755
15,478,753
1,047,434
145,477,000
18,512
981,136
7,992,556
36,116,912
1,170,884
46,280,000
46,280,000
981,136
7,992,556
36,116,912
1,170,884
46,280,000
46,280,000
535,795
6,569,671
40,646,233
82,430,000
82,430,000
32,991,084
1,073,912
42,280,000
42,280,000
536,920
7,876,270
33,786,990
1,099,820
43,300,000
43,300,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
$183,873,755
$135,284,000
$127,799,772
$38,596,439
$662,527,000
77,592,000
15,000,000
130,477,000
2018 Bond Projects (proposed) **
Site 53
Mod - Alcott Elementary
Site XX
New - Kirkland Area Elementary
Site 67
Mod - Kamiakin Middle School
Site 84
Addition - Lake Washington High School
Site XX
New - Eastside Choice High School
18,512
524,272
7,690,732
34,678,301
Portable Classrooms (as needed)
Portables
Totals
$33,083,601
$143,889,433
$21,000,000
$641,527,000
* Fiscal year is from September of the year stated through August of the following year (e.g. "2016" means "September 2016 through August 2017")
** Monies for the major projects above have not been secured but these projects are shown because of the need
^ Includes secured and unsecured local bond funding, impact fees, and mitigation fees. Impact fees may be applied to growth related capacity projects.
May 18, 2016
Table 6
APPROVAL OF MONITORING REPORT
EL-14, TECHNOLOGY
June 6, 2016
The Board’s Governance Policies call for the monitoring of each policy based on
the annual calendar in GP-6. All areas of EL-14, Technology, are in compliance
and it is now being presented for approval.
RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors approves the monitoring report for EL-14, Technology, as
presented.
- 13 -
Lake Washington School District
Executive Limitation Monitoring Report
EL-14 Technology
June 6, 2016
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
1. Provide a comprehensive technology plan that directs the priorities and
outcomes for the expenditure of technology resources.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Overview
A comprehensive technology plan is developed and implemented in alignment with the district’s capital
technology levy planning cycle and in service to the district mission, vision and goals. The technology plan
operationalizes the district’s commitment to: keep pace with technology innovation that supports student
learning and staff effectiveness; develop and scale support systems and infrastructure to meet the needs of
our staff, students, and parent users; and, to ensure consistent, safe and secure network reliability.
During 2015-16, year two of the technology operations four-year levy plan was executed, including the
following:










Initiated three district-wide infrastructure projects funded by the capital technology levy that will greatly
increase speed, resilience, and access for users across the district, including:
o Wireless Network Upgrade – Nov. 2015-Summer 2016, $1.5M
o Physical Network Upgrade – Feb. 2016-Aug. 2018, $6M
o Voice System Unified Communications (Skype for Business), $1.2M.
Began requirements gathering and documentation for district web site refresh.
Implemented new online payment management systems for class schedule fees, athletic forms and fees,
volunteer (e.g. grandparent, etc.) donations, and nutrition services lunch money accounts.
Launched new asset management system to replace outdated asset tracking system, providing better
tracking and management for laptops and textbooks.
Implemented a software tool, Career Cruising, for secondary students in alignment with the High School
and Beyond Plan and College and Career Readiness efforts.
Continued work on the data center survivability and restoration, which is on target for completion in
summer 2016, including virtual servers, cloud storage, cloud services for e-mail, document retention,
and running core district systems in the cloud.
Migrated 30,000 computers to Windows 10 operating system and Office 2016, creating a smaller
“image” for computer hard drives to improve hardware performance, allowing for implementation of a
“software-in-use” tracking system, and providing the ability for “self-service” downloads of software
needed for specific users.
Secured managed services for computer imaging and updates to provide required expertise for
increasingly complex infrastructure management applications.
Implemented technology needed for Advanced Placement (AP) language assessments and district wide
Smarter Balanced testing.
Upgraded student devices based on capital levy lifecycle plan to keep technology current on a four-year
refresh cycle.
Executive Limitation 14
June 2016
Page 1 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
1. Provide a comprehensive technology plan that directs the priorities and
outcomes for the expenditure of technology resources.


In
Compliance

Developed training for office staff around key business processes and Skyward student information
system management.
Created a new Digital Applications and Voice team, to respond to the shift from paper to digital content
and processes. Staff manage the end-to-end customer experience to ensure software is provisioned
correctly and is performing optimally.
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Our goal is to ensure that the Lake Washington technology infrastructure is robust, functional, and
comprehensive. Achievement of our goal requires ongoing commitment to stringent technology standards;
provision of adequate technical support; and, adherence to a realistic, consistent, and appropriate schedule
for upgrading technology equipment through voter approved technology levies.
Network Infrastructure
The district’s Wide Area Network (WAN) is segmented between physical and wireless connectivity for
endpoints that connect to a fiber-optic network that carries traffic from schools and buildings to the data
center and out to the cloud or internet.
Internet Bandwidth
The district’s internet bandwidth was tripled in 2015 to 4 Gigabits (4096 Megabits) per second. Work to
make the bandwidth capacity expandable was completed in September 2015 (expandable up to 20 Gigabits).

As of March of 2016, the average daily bandwidth use district wide is 225 Megabits ongoing, with
spikes as high as 1,700 Megabits. This use continues to grow as shifts from paper to digital content
and business processes increase.
Physical Network
The physical network that connects all of our current sites runs on fiber optic cable owned by the district.
One gigabit per second (Gbps) connectivity is available between all sites and the district’s data center.
There are a 10Gbps connections to Evergreen Middle School that serves as a connection hub to eleven other
school sites as well as to each of the comprehensive high schools - Eastlake, Redmond, Juanita, and Lake
Washington - which were increased to 10Gps in 2015.

Work is underway to increase the connectivity between all sites to 10GPs by August 2018.
The district maintains a Wide Area Network that contains 1,050 network devices.

A capital levy project to update network devices that provide physical connectivity to endpoints and
wireless access points begins this summer and is scheduled to be completed by August 2018.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 2 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Wireless Network
The wireless network currently includes 1,850 wireless access points (WAP) that provide coverage at all
locations. Each classroom/area is outfitted with an access point rated to support 25 devices. Each access
point can overlap zones to balance connections.

A capital levy project began in January 2016 to upgrade all existing wireless access points to a
modern cloud-based system. This project is scheduled to be complete by August, 2016.
Data Center Infrastructure
The data center is located at the Resource Center. Servers and other shared technical systems reside in the
data center. These include:
Servers
The district currently maintains 158 servers, up from 152 the previous year, plus a dozen other network
appliances. In 2014, we moved all Skyward applications for fiscal, human resources, and student
information functions fully to the cloud. The goal is for 80% of our servers to be virtualized and/or moved
into the cloud to reduce total cost of ownership and improve disaster recovery and survivability.

Work is continuing toward this goal and to refresh any at-risk hardware. Currently, 74% of the
servers have been virtualized using Microsoft Hyper-V technology, up from 56% last year.
Storage
The district has six storage systems deployed in the data center including:
1. A StorSimple device with 20 Terabytes (TB) of on premise tiered storage. Tiered storage provides
solid-state fast storage for high-access data, slower storage for intermittently accessed data, and
cloud storage for archival data.
2. A Hewlett Packard Enterprise Virtual Array (EVA) holds 37 Terabytes (TB) of data and is used
primarily for high-access databases and virtual server storage.
3. A Dell network-attached storage with 16 TB of data.
4. An older Hewlett Packard modular smart array with 8 TB.
5. A StorSimple 8100 with 15 TB of local storage was installed during April 2015 and is now used for
department data folders and document archives. It has built-in deduplication and compression and can
store up to 75TB locally. It automatically replicates to the Microsoft Azure cloud for offsite disaster
recovery needs. District, student and staff personal files were moved to Office 365 cloud storage.

In February 2016, a sixth HP 3Par storage device that holds 100 TB was added to consolidate server
and database storage of older storage devices.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 3 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Active Directory
Microsoft Active Directory (AD) is the user account authentication authority used in the district computer
network. Active Directory accounts provide authorized users access to district technology systems such as
email, portals, applications, and web-based resources. Six Windows Server Domain Controllers are
deployed to manage the enterprise level technology environment. Following best practice, one of these
servers is physical and the others are virtualized. Accounts for every staff member and student in the district
are currently supported. In addition, a limited number of accounts for authorized contractors and vendors are
managed. Parent accounts are maintained in a separate domain. Student and parent account provisioning is
automated, but staff provisioning remains partially manual due to complexities of individual functions and
needs.
 Development work is underway to move to Microsoft’s Azure Active Directory cloud solution.
Software Provisioning
Increased demand for software titles and the move to mobile devices for students has required changes in
how software is provisioned. Previously, much of the software provisioning was done manually or over the
wired network and in lab environments. These changes require that most software is either web-based or can
be installed over the network.

Reconfiguration of Microsoft’s System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) was completed to
provision software for endpoint devices. This system is capable of network-delivered imaging and
software deployment. SCCM also assists with license tracking and compliance as well as provides
access to software by user role and need. Software can be pushed to devices or provisioned in a
manner that enables users to “pull down” available software and install it to their own device
through our “Software Center.”
Technology Operations documents, images, and conducts user-testing for instructional software needs. This
is particularly important for programs requiring specialized software such as Career and Technical
Education (CTE), STEM Courses, Graphic Arts, and State Assessment Secure Exam Browsers.
Data Backup & Recovery
School and financial records in the Skyward system are secured by the Washington State Information
Processing Cooperative (WSIPC).
Local servers and databases, including web pages and the portal, are secured through HP Data Protector and
stored on the Tape Library or local storage. The most critical data is currently being backed up using the
automated tape system. Less critical data is backed up using manual snapshots to disk storage within the
data center which could be lost in the event of a disaster.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 4 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence

By utilizing the new HP 3Par storage and Microsoft Data Protector server software, we are moving
server and database backups from a manual snapshot and tape system. Backups will be stored on the
HP 3Par device and be replicated to the Microsoft Azure cloud services for Disaster Recovery needs.
Core business systems have been migrated to the cloud to provide back-up for critical business systems,
such as WSIPC student and fiscal information systems, e-mail and document storage.
Technical Security Infrastructure
Certain technologies are deployed in order to safeguard the district’s network and technology resources
from unauthorized access, nefarious activity, and inappropriate content.
Access Security
Microsoft Active Directory is the authentication authority for the district’s computer network. All staff and
students in grades K-12 are issued accounts.

With the upgrade of our Active Directory servers to Windows Server 2012, work is underway on
password policy changes. These will be rolled out as part of the development of the Microsoft’s
Azure Active Directory cloud solution. This will include a password self-service portal.
Network Intrusion Security/Fire Wall
The network architecture is designed to protect the district’s computing network through the use of standard
hardware and software. Two Palo Alto Network (PAN) firewalls are used to prevent unauthorized network
access from the Internet.
Web Filtering
Two Palo Alto Network appliances and a Lightspeed Rocket network appliance are used to filter all network
traffic leaving for the internet. These devices make the district compliant to Children’s Internet Protection
Act (CIPA) regulations. The district also employs a Lightspeed Mobile agent on the secondary Mobile
Access for Students (sMAS) 1:1 devices that re-directs web traffic back to the Rocket appliance so that web
content is filtered when student devices are not connected to the district network.

Work is underway to replace the Lighstpeed filtering system with Microsoft Direct Access
technology. This change will ensure web traffic goes through our network filtering device. Direct
Access will also provide better access to district network resources when using a district device
outside of our network, making the experience very similar to being on-site.
Malicious Traffic Detection
The Palo Alto Network (PAN) devices also provide deep packet analyzing to detect and filter network
packets that are not authorized to pass between our network and the internet. This device blocks malware
activities as well as nefarious software, such as illegal file sharing software and security bypass software.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 5 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Anti-Virus
The district deploys Microsoft Endpoint Protection to all of its servers and endpoint devices. This anti-virus
protection solution is managed centrally by Microsoft’s System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM).
Network Access
District staff and students are provided network access through district-owned and configured equipment.
Guest users are informed by our web gateway of the Terms and Conditions of use for our guest wireless
network and must click to accept the terms before being granted access.
Staff and Student Technology Equipment
A significant amount of technology equipment has been deployed in classrooms to facilitate learning and
support district operations. Following are the components of our staff and student technology:
Projection Stations: A multi-media capable computer connected to a projector that displays lesson
material upon a viewing surface/screen. Stations include a wireless keyboard and mouse allowing the
teacher flexible movement around the room.
Interactive Whiteboards: A wall-mounted device that allows teachers and students to create and display
interactive learning content. This device is connected to the projection computer. Interactive individual
student response systems that work in conjunction with the interactive whiteboard are available to
teachers.
Document Cameras: A digital display device that allows teachers to model processes/procedures and
display artifacts, displays, and documents through the projection system.
Voice Amplification: A sound amplification system that uses infrared technology to transmit the
speaker’s voice and amplify it through ceiling or wall speakers.
Elementary Student Computer Devices: Carts of wireless laptops are deployed at either a 3:1 (grades
K through 2) or 2:1 (grades 3 through 5) student-to-computer ratio. These shared carts are mobile and
can be rolled into classrooms for use by individual students or for work in groups with multiple students
accessing a single computer device.
Secondary Student Computer Devices: Individually-issued wireless devices are deployed at a
1:1 student-to-computer ratio. These devices provide students access to electronic resources at home and
school.
Library and Special Programs Computers: Standard computer allocations for library and special
programs (ELL, Safety Net, and Special Education) are:
15 student-use computers per library (elementary and secondary)
2 student-use computers per 7 students for Special Ed (elementary only)
1 student-use computer per 10 students for Safety Net (elementary only)
4 student-use computers per ELL teacher (elementary only)
Special Use Computers: Some programs such as CTE, Graphic Arts, Photography, and STEM use
software applications that require more computing power than student issued laptops can provide. These
programs budgets fund more powerful cart-based laptops and desktop computer labs.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 6 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Staff Computer Devices: All staff are provided access to a desktop computer installed with Microsoft
Windows 10 and Microsoft Office 365 Pro Plus 2016. Printers, email, and internet access are provided
for conducting the business of the district. Staff computers are refreshed on a four-year basis.

A Teacher Technology Field Test was undertaken in preparation for the staff computer refresh
planned for spring/summer 2017. The field test included 60 teacher volunteers testing use of mobile
computers, wireless presentation stations and Skype for Business. The purpose is to understand
teachers’ experience and needs when using a single laptop and wireless-enabled projection,
compared to the current standard of wired desktops and presentation equipment.
Technical Support
Providing technical support is an important component of an effective technology infrastructure. Technical
support includes Technical Support Specialists (TSS), who work at the Help Desk and in the field, and other
staff who support the technical components of the technology infrastructure and the Data Center.

In 2015-16, customer support staffing was increased as part of last year’s approved budget. This
increased school/site support from 14 to 20 staff and added 3 regional technology support
coordinators to improve customer support to schools and departments. This increased on-site support
at schools from 2 hours per day to 4 hours per day in secondary and from 2 hours per week to 2
hours per day for elementary schools. Current technical support staffing is 20 Technical Support
Specialists (TSS) who work at the Help Desk and in the schools, 3 Regional Technical Support
Coordinators who supervise TSS staff, and 4 Technical Support Analysts who handle escalation
tickets and hardware repair processes. Other technology operations staff support the technology
infrastructure and networks, data center, applications and provisioning, voice systems, MAS
program and technology purchasing and deployment.
Staff/Student and Parent Support
Help Central, an internal staff portal established in 2013-14, provides staff notifications and an alerts ticker
for known issues or outages in order to improve staff user support and promote customer self-service. Alerts
have reduced significantly, as shown below, which indicates marked improvement in our technology
infrastructure and service deliverable, and increased end user technology acumen.
Alerts issed for the past several years are as follows:
 2013/14 - 78 alerts posted
 2014/15 - 26 alerts posted
 2015/16 - 17 alerts posted
Parent support is provided through email requests to [email protected]. The most active time of
the day for parents requesting help is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. on most weekdays. The service is provided
by a third party for tier one and integrated into the district help ticket system and support model. Monthly
volumes ranges by month. Data for the past two years shows high and low volumes as follows:
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 7 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
2. Provide a comprehensive and functional technology infrastructure that
addresses needs of staff, students, and community.
In
Compliance

Evidence


2014/15
2015/16
High: 738 September
High: 824 September
Low: 98 June
Low: 70 April
The number of help tickets opened by our customer base decreased this year and closure rates improved.
This is due to increased staffing support within the buildings and the addition of staff whose primary focus
is to understand the customers’ end-to-end experience for a specific curricular or business application and to
ensure the software is provisioned and functioning correctly.

Help ticket volume and closure rate stats for the past three years are shown in the following table:
3. Provide easily accessible, relevant, and current data to appropriate
users to direct school and instructional improvement planning.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Data for district and school continuous improvement planning is provided through the district-developed
Data Dashboard and Skyward Student Information System. The Dashboard is a “component” of INFORM
and is hosted by Edmin.com. INFORM is also used for custom data reporting and for staff to sign-up for
professional development courses. INFORM is accessible for teachers and school leadership teams for use
and analysis on the web (secured). Data can be reported by a broad range of variables including
demographics, program, or standard.
Skyward, a student information system, is accessible to district personnel who interact with student
demographic information, student and family contact information, attendance, discipline information,
official transcripts, and graduation tracking. All teachers use Skyward’s grade book to record student grades
and issue report cards. All teachers, office support staff, school administrators, and district administrators
have access to the grade book system. The system is open to families, allowing for more timely
communication and feedback between teachers and parents.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 8 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
3. Provide easily accessible, relevant, and current data to appropriate
users to direct school and instructional improvement planning.
In
Compliance

Evidence
OSPI’s Education Data System (EDS) is a secure web-based suite of applications accessible to district and
building staff who manage assessments to ensure all students meet state requirements. It provides data to
building and district staff on graduation data and assessment results for scheduling students and highly
qualified teacher information. Final assessment data in EDS is also imported into the district data
warehouse.
In addition to data provided to school staff for instructional planning and school improvement, there is an
increasing demand to provide data to state or federal agencies which is also frequently used by district staff
in planning. Much of this data is collected through OSPI’s Comprehensive Education Data and Research
System (CEDARS) which requires districts to submit student information from Skyward that links data
between teachers, students, assessments, financials, and eventually facilities to inform policy and funding
decisions.

Since its inception in 2009, the number of state reports dependent on CEDARS has more than
doubled. In this school year alone, the number of reports increased from 25 to 38. Reports and
processes through CEDARS reporting that is managed by technology data services staff include:
1. Adjusted Cohort Graduation and Dropout annual Reporting (P210)
2. Annual Behavior and Weapons reporting
3. Annual CTE Student Enrollment Review (P210VOC)
4. Annual Measurable Objectives and Adequate Yearly Progress
5. Annual Unexcused Student Absence reporting
6. Assessment Test Pre–ID (MSP, HSPE, EOC, WELPA, DAPE, PORT, WAKids and SBA)
7. Certificate of Academic Achievement/Certificate of Individual Achievement Status Listing
8. Direct Certification Free Lunch
9. Discipline Summary reporting
10. Dual Credit annual reporting
11. EDEN Reporting (Federal)
12. EdFacts Reporting (Federal)
13. Eligibility for State–funded Full Day Kindergarten programs
14. English Language Learners (ELL) Legislative Report
15. Enrollment information used in the allocation of applicable Federal programs
16. Gifted/Highly Capable Program End of Year reporting
17. High Poverty School determination for National Board Certification salary bonus
18. Highly Qualified Teacher report
19. Homeless Children and Youth reports, including McKinney–Vento
20. Homeless End of Year reporting K-3 High Poverty
21. K-4 Literacy
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 9 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
3. Provide easily accessible, relevant, and current data to appropriate
users to direct school and instructional improvement planning.
In
Compliance

Evidence
22. Key Performance Indicator Analytics
23. LAP Funding Data
24. LAP Program Student Growth and End of Year reporting
25. Medicaid Eligibility Rate
26. November Special Education Federal Child Count Report
27. November Special Education Federal Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Report
28. Online Provider Accountability Data and Reports
29. Principal and Teacher Evaluations
30. Safety Net Application
31. Special Education Federal Allocations based on October Public School Enrollment Count
32. State Board Accountability Index
33. Title I Program End of Year reporting
34. Title III Immigrant student eligibility for federal funding
35. Transitional Bilingual reports
36. Updating the MSIS database managed by MSDR for Migrant Reporting
37. Washington State Report Card
4. Provide for a safe and secure computing environment for students and
staff that:
a. Prohibits the use of technology resources for commercial,
political, illegal, or indecent purposes or that disrupts the learning
environment of students;
b. Prohibits access to personal information about students or staff
that does not have an educational purpose or that is not
appropriately authorized;
c. Prohibits collection of electronic information for which there is no
legitimate need; and
d. Uses methods of collecting, reviewing, transmitting, or storing
information that protect against improper access to the information
being elicited.
In
Compliance

Evidence
Safety of our students and staff is a high priority. Technologies that provide security are carefully selected to
ensure that students and staff are not vulnerable to inappropriate material, fraudulent behavior, and/or
malicious activities that inhibit the appropriate use of district resources.
An Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) includes guidelines for internet safety and for the appropriate use of
district computer networks. The AUP is included as a component of each school’s student handbook. The
AUP is reviewed annually with all staff and students. Students must acknowledge responsibility for
understanding the AUP every time they log on to a district computer. Students who violate the AUP are
subject to the consequences, specified in the AUP and discipline policies.
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 10 of 11
EL-14 Technology
Executive Limitation: The CEO shall establish and maintain technology systems and applications
consistent with accomplishment of the Board’s End Results.
Accordingly, the CEO shall:
4. Provide for a safe and secure computing environment for students and
staff that:
{see page 10 for complete listing}.
Evidence {continued}
In
Compliance

The Technology Department further enhanced security and performance by upgrading and adding a second
appliance that analyzes computer traffic blocking Peer to Peer Applications (BitTorrent) and Internet
Anonymizers (proxy avoidance). This upgrade was required to meet the traffic demands of the growing
digital footprint and allow enough bandwidth to accommodate several hundred simultaneous state testing
sessions without disruption.
The district collects personal information as part of student and human resource applications in Skyward.
Personal information about staff or students is only provided to those users that have a legitimate
educational need and have appropriate permissions. Employment or current contractual status is verified
through the Human Resources Department. Appropriate administrator approval processes are followed prior
to granting access to student and/or staff information. Transmission of student information required by the
state is done through the Comprehensive Education Data and Research System (CEDARS), which provides
for weekly submission of electronic student information through a secure process managed by the
Washington School Information Processing Cooperative (WSIPC). Transmission of staff data to the state is
also managed by WSIPC.
The district must comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The Student
Information System contains privacy fields for tracking parent permissions pertaining to the release of
student information. District policy is published on the district’s website and staff members are trained to
use these privacy fields for appropriate data requests and release of student information.
Any external requests for research data, surveys, or other measures that may impact students or teachers
must be approved by the Superintendent or designee as described in Policy LC, Relations with Education
Research Agencies.
Requests for information under Policy KBA, Public’s Right to Know, as well as public disclosure laws are
made through the communications department. Staff works with legal counsel when requests include
personal information of staff or students.
Security protocols also help protect personal information. Policies are in place to assure that users are given
appropriate and necessary access levels to district systems. Employees that resign or are terminated have
their access to the LWSD network revoked when their employment ends. All K-12 grade students are
provided with individual student log-on identifiers to protect their files from other students. All Internet
traffic requires authentication following security protocols (e.g. SSL – Secure Socket Layer) to ensure that
information is secure.
I certify the above to be correct as of June 6, 2016.
Traci Pierce, Superintendent
Executive Limitation 14
June 6. 2016
Page 11 of 11
DONATIONS
June 6, 2016
SITUATION
Individuals and/or groups periodically desire to make monetary donations to the school district.
Monetary donations which exceed $1,000 are submitted for board approval. Following is a list of
those requests for the time period including the individual or group making the request, the
amount of donation and the purpose for which the funds are to be used.
From
Amount
Purpose
Audubon Elementary PTSA to
Audubon Elementary
$4,597.50
To provide stipends for running club,
intramural sports, and music.
Albert Einstein PTSA to Einstein
Elementary
$1,010.64
To purchase printer and toner.
Horace Mann Elementary PTSA
to Mann Elementary
$13,396.54
John Muir Elementary PTSA to
Muir Elementary
$6,800.00
To provide student enrichment ($5,500.00)
and support choir ($1,300.00).
Redmond Elementary PTSA to
Redmond Elementary
$5,398.35
To purchase ProBooks for ELL department.
To provide classroom enhancement.
To purchase library books ($3,721.98),
equipment for video control room
($5,647.74), color printers ($1,243.01), and
ping pong table ($1,609.62); and support
academic enrichment ($4,044.33) and
extracurricular activities ($6,954.00).
International Community School
PTSA to ICS
$23,220.68
Redmond Middle School PTSA to
Redmond Middle
$1,466.00
To support library.
Rose Hill Middle School PTSA to
Rose Hill Middle
$4,407.38
To purchase IXL (online math program)
license renewal ($2,217.38) and provide
stipend for Lego club (2,190.00).
SYMETRA to Juanita High School
$10,000.00
TOTAL
$70,297.09
To support library.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Directors accepts the donations/grants as identified at
the June 6, 2016 Board Meeting.
-14-
DISTRICT TEXTBOOK ADOPTION
MATH – MIDDLE SCHOOL
June 6, 2016
SITUATION
During the 2014-15 and 2015-2016 school years, the Middle School Math Adoption Committee
reviewed research and standards and developed rubrics to use for the evaluation of various
math curricula. These rubrics included: Best Practice Alignment; Standards Alignment;
Assessment Alignment; Organization and Design; and Digital Resources.
This year, the committee heard presentations from publishers, evaluated curricula for middle
school math using rubrics, piloted materials in classrooms, and narrowed options to a final
recommendation for each subject. The district’s Instructional Materials Committee reviewed
these materials and recommended them for adoption at its May 4 meeting.
We provided an opportunity for public review and comment of instructional materials under
consideration for adoption and an opportunity to give written feedback. Materials were on
display outside of our Curriculum Library at the Resource Center from April 22 – May 27.
Teachers will have multiple options to participate in professional development in math
standards, proficiency scales, and curriculum materials during an afternoon session in June
and in August. Training in the math standards and collaboration time to learn and implement
the new materials will be provided throughout the 2016-17 school year.
Teacher and student materials will be bar-coded and entered into the district textbook
inventory system during the summer. The curriculum materials will be implemented in the
2016-17 school year.
Title:
Author:
Publisher:
Copyright:
No. of Copies:
Price:
School Requesting:
Classification:
Glencoe Math Courses 1-3
Multiple
McGraw Hill
2015
4750
$146.70 (includes textbooks and 10 year digital subscription)
District Middle School Math Adoption Committee
Grades 6-8
RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors approves the recommendation from the Adoption Committee for
Middle School Math and the Instructional Materials Committee to adopt the above listed
materials for use in the district.
‐ 15 ‐