1 PRESS KIT EXHIBITION 19 APRIL TO 21 JULY 2014 EXHIBITION CURATORS Stephen Bann, Emeritus Professor of History of Art and Senior Research Fellow at Bristol University. Stéphane Paccoud, Head Curator of 19th century collections of painting and sculpture at the Fine Arts Museum of Lyon. 1 This exhibition has been declared to be of national interest by the Ministry of Culture and Communication and the Museum Service of France, and as such it receives exceptional state financial support. This exhibition has been compiled with the support of the National Institute of Art History. L’Invention du Passé, Gothique mon Amour... 1802-1830. The exhibition is present at the Royal Monastery of Brou in Bourgen-Bresse until 21 September 2014. PRESS CONTACT AT THE FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF LYON Sylvaine Manuel de Condinguy Tel: +33 (0)4 72 10 41 15. Email: [email protected] www.mba-lyon.fr THE EXHIBITION Before the 19th century, historical events of the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and 17th century were seldom depicted by artists. However, the rediscovery of this ‘national’ history would lead to a veritable cultural and artistic upheaval during the first half of the 19th century. Artists developed a passion for these new subjects from the past that broke with classical tradition and the hierarchy of genres*. They created more naturalist, living, colourful and picturesque compositions that provoked strong emotions in viewers. Painters and sculptors carried out detailed historiographic and plastic arts research that helped them to conceptualise these works. They also relied upon numerous artistic references from past centuries and, along with historians, writers and figures from the world of stagecraft who were motivated by the same acute interest in these periods, established a highly fruitful dialogue between the arts during the era of Romanticism. These works enjoyed wide success among collectors and public alike and they benefitted from a widespread reputation, notably thanks to the medium of print. They remain as a strong presence in the collective imagination of today and have become subconscious references to our conception of the past. 2 This exhibition brings together for the first time the testimony of this artistic and cultural phenomenon as it unfolded in France and Europe. * The hierarchy of genres was established in the 17th century. It consists of the classification of paintings according to subject. At the top of this hierarchy was historical painting, often in large format. It was also called the Grand Genre and it included subjects from classical history, mythology and the Bible. The next category was portraits, which were genre scenes of everyday life, landscapes and still life, and it was generally painted in small format. VALENTINE DE MILAN. BIRTH OF A GENRE 1 In 1802, Fleury Richard, a young and hitherto unknown painter from Lyon who was formed in the studio of Jacques Louis David, met with immense success when he exhibited a painting that appeared to be of a new genre. This work was Valentine de Milan mourning the death of her husband, Louis of Orléans, who was assassinated in 1407 by John, the Duke of Burgundy. Both critics and the public praised his choice of this previously neglected subject from the medieval past. The artist’s choice was inspired by his visits to the Musée des Monuments Français, which had been created by Alexandre Lenoir. Fleury Richard (1777-1852) Valentine de Milan mourning the death of her husband, Louis of Orléans, who was assassinated in 1407 by John, the Duke of Burgundy 1802 Oil on canvas Saint-Pétersbourg, musée de l ’Ermitage © The State Hermitage museum / Leonard Kheifets, Alexander Koksharov Valentine de Milan (1366-1408) was the daughter of Duke Jean Galéas Visconti and Isabelle de France. She became the Duchess of Orléans in 1389 after marrying Louis the First, the younger brother of Charles IV, King of France. In 1392, the king’s insanity resulted in the Duke of Orléans participating in a Royal Regency Council meeting in the context of the power battle which led his cousin, Jean the Fearless, to order his assassination in 1407. After his murder, Valentine de Milan demanded that justice be done until she died of grief less than a year later. The work was a major success at the 1802 Salon and joined the art collection of Empress Joséphine three years later. Richard was inspired in his efforts to bring together the works seized from Parisian churches during the Revolution by the ornamental recumbent statue on the tomb of Valentine Visconti, the Duchess of Orléans, which fascinated him. He would sketch the statue in his notebooks, and this inspiration was enhanced by his motto – “Rien ne m’est plus. Plus rien ne m’est”. Numerous studies that were preserved in his studio collections allow us to follow his creative development and reveal how the artist gave life to this figure, who is placed at the heart of this poetic and melancholic scene. The medieval architecture and the diffused light from a stained-glass window with a partially closed green taffeta curtain are the key elements of the painting’s success. They are also to be found in his more contemporary works, and notably in ‘The Artist’s Studio’, which is an auto portrait set in an imaginary studio that appears as an artistic programme. * The Salon was an exhibition in Paris that was dedicated to the works of living painters, sculptors, engravers and architects. Presented at irregular intervals at first, it became a yearly event from 1833. 3 THE ‘TROUBADORS’ AND THE ‘ANECDOTIC GENRE’ 2 The success of Fleury Richard inspired his contemporaries, who also began to become interested in the historical events of the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and the 17th century. This resulted in numerous such works being exhibited as Parisian Salons during the Empire (1804-1814) and the Restoration (1814-1830). Fleury Richard (1777-1852) Francis 1 shows his sister, Marguerite of Navarro, the lines he has just etched on a windwn pane with his diamond 1804 Oil on panel Arenenberg, musée Napoléon Thurgovie 4 © Napoleon Museum, Thurgovie/Daniel Steine The scene occurs at the Château of Chambord where King Francis I, known for his penchant for female conquests and affairs, has engraved an ironic inscription on a window – “Souvent femme varie. Bien fol est qui s’y fie.” Amused, he shows the inscription to his sister, Queen Marguerite of Navarro. This anecdote served first and foremost as the pretext for a reconstitution of a Renaissance interior in which the furniture and glass panes are depicted in high detail. The artist looked for sources in order to paint his figures. He was inspired by known portraits of the king, particularly one painted by Titian, and found his model for the female figure in paintings by Leonardo da Vinci at The Louvre. Nevertheless they did not choose to depict major historical events, as was the case for Neoclassicism. On the contrary, they preferred to use anecdotes from the lives of great historical figures. Princes and princesses, military heroes, artists and writers; they all provide a more intimate historical viewpoint. The scenes show a propensity for detail as well as a smooth aspect and quality workmanship that can also be seen in Dutch 17th century painting. Most of the works are in smaller formats and were created for a clientele of art lovers. Many were sold to famous personalities such as Empress Joséphine, her children Queen Hortensia and Prince Eugène, and, later, the Duchess of Berry, the daughter-in-law of King Charles X, thus increasing the success of this new art form. Despite all the popular success, which was reinforced by printed reproductions of these works and even their reproduction on objects, the critics held mixed opinions. According to some of them, works about secondary historical events and in restricted formats could not be considered as being as worthy as more classical historical paintings. They thus became a new and intermediate category between history and genre painting called the Anecdotic Genre. This name was subsequently changed to Troubadors, in reference to an imaginary Middle Ages. An unknown horseman defeated all his opponents during a jousting tournament in 1337, but one of them managed to lift the visor of his helmet. The rider turned out to be Bertrand du Guesclin (C.A. 1320-1380), a young nobleman from Brittany whose father had forbidden him from participating in the tournament. Du Guesclin would become a major figure during the Hundred Years War, during which he commanded the royal army with the rank of Supreme Commander of France. This painting is one of the most complete and almost archeological reconstitutions of the past by Révoil. The work was inspired by illuminative medieval manuscripts and objects from his collection, such as the oliphant into which a herald is blowing a call to arms. It was made in Italy at the end of the 11th century. Pierre Révoil The Tournament 1812 Oil on canvas Lyon, musée des Beaux-Arts © Lyon MBA - Photo Alain Basset PIERRE RÉVOIL, PAINTER AND ANTIQUE COLLECTOR 3 From Lyon, as was his friend Fleury Richard, Pierre Révoil was one of the first artists to collect art objects from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance and use them as models for their works. This collection, which comprises armour, furniture, ivory and fabrics, is one of the first to be almost exclusively composed of objects from these eras. Highly reputed at the time, it was compiled in Lyon, where it was a source of inspiration for the artist and his students at the Fine Arts School before being acquired by The Louvre in 1828. Révoil’s attempts to reconstitute history were characterised by a marked sense of detail that led to the accumulation of many objects, in the manner of an archeologist. The Convalescence of Bayard, for example, brought together a French armour from the second half of the 16th century and a 13th century gold-plated Italian triptych. This meticulous approach was quickly pounced upon by critics, Révoil’s work did not enjoy the success of Richard’s approach, and Révoil subsequently fell out with him. Nevertheless, Révoil’s erudite research and quest for detail meant that his work represented one of the most comprehensive attempts to restitute the spirit of those eras. An example of this was when he recreated the subtle lighting effects of the Middle Ages with The Tournament and inspired himself directly from a painted 14th century manuscript that exalted the spirit of chivalry. 5 INGRES 4 Formed in Paris in David’s studio at the same time as Richard and Révoil, Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres was aware of their new approaches and their success, and began to paint similar themes but in a different spirit. Although the artist found his inspiration in the events of the Middle Ages and in the life of Henry IV, who he also painted in smaller formats, he nevertheless refused to adopt the methods of archeological reconstitution and anecdotic detail. Confronting works by Coupin de la Couperie and Ingres that both showed the kiss of Paolo and Francesca offers a stark demonstration of this change. Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres (1780-1867) Paolo and Francesca 1819 Oil on canvas Angers, musée des Beaux-Arts © Musées d’Angers, cliché Pierre David 6 The subject of this painting was inspired by Chant 5 of Hell, by the Italian writer Dante. Ingres illustrates the key moment in it when Francesca, in the company of Paolo Malatesta, the younger brother of her husband Gianciotto, a 13th century lord from Rimini, is reading the adventure book written by Lancelot of the Lake. Whilst reading the story of Lancelot’s love for Queen Guenièvre, Francesca and Paolo realised that they shared similar sentiments and kissed each other, and it is at that moment that the jealous husband sees them. Drawing his sword, he prepares to kill them. Ingres had already painted a similar composition on this subject, in 1814, after which he painted several other variations on the theme that differed greatly in the degree of detail he used, most notably in this example, which features a Neo-Gothic frame designed by Claude Aimé Chevanard. Ingres strived above all to express the same preoccupations with visual arts that were present in his work as a whole, whether it involved large historical paintings, nudes or portraits. His concentration on aspects of line is dominant, and the subjects are taken out of naturalist representation in order that they conform to the beauty of formal exercises that would sometimes deform their bodies. These historical scenes, which constitute a major part of his body of work, were not understood by the public and critics, who reproached Ingres for their unreality. These works, which were destined for a public of art lovers because of their format, are remarkable for their very bright colours. They also offer a re-reading of the art of the past masters they referred to. This was notably the case for The Aretino and the envoy of Charles Quint, which was recently acquired by the Fine Arts Museum of Lyon. André Félibien relates in his Vies des Peintres that Emperor Charles Quint is said to have visited the painter Titien in Bologna in 1533 to ask him to paint his portrait. Titien was very nervous in the presence of this illustrious model however and he inadvertently dropped his brush, whereupon the emperor bent down, picked it up, and handed it back to him. This apparently apocryphal episode illustrates how much respect the rich and powerful had for artists, and they would not hesitate to pay tribute to their talent. This would explain why Bergeret emphasised the grateful recognition that he insisted should be afforded to society’s creators. Pierre Nolasque Bergeret (1782-1863) Charles Quint picking up Titien’s paintbrush 1808 Oil on canvas Bordeaux, musée des Beaux-Arts © Musée des Beaux-Arts-mairie de Bordeaux. Cliché L .Gauthier THE LIVES OF ARTISTS 5 Among those subjects that were privileged by artists, the illustration of episodes from the lives of past masters was a genre in itself that enjoyed uninterrupted success during the first half of the 19th century. These anecdotes, which have more in common with legend than historical reality, were taken from both old and contemporary accounts. The first of them – the lives of the most celebrated painters, sculptors and architects – by Giorgio Vasari in 1550, has been reedited numerous times over the years and translated into French. Contemporary writers such as Stendhal, with his history of painting in Italy, have subsequently kept this literary genre alive. The evocation of artists from the past offers us an opportunity to celebrate their art, but it has also led to their eminent stature being acknowledged. They appear as the equals of princes, particularly when painted by Pierre Nolasque Bergeret, who initiated this genre. Raphaël received visits from all the powerful men and great thinkers of his time before he died, and Emperor Charles Quint picked up Titian’s paintbrush for him after he had dropped it on the floor by inadvertence. The innate genius of artists was praised, and they were said to have had exceptional capacities even when they were children. The young shepherd Giotto was discovered as a result of this belief whilst drawing sheep in the countryside of Tuscany. That would be the prelude to his glorious future as a painter. 7 The event depicted in this painting was taken from Les Quatre Stuarts, a work by Chateaubriand. After the execution of Charles 1 of England in 1649 that followed his overthrow in a civil war, Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658) lifted the lid to his coffin to contemplate his body. For visitors to the 1831 Salon who saw this painting, this kind of work evoked the French Revolution and the execution of Louis XVI. Recent discoveries have established that Delaroche knew English art of that time very well and that this knowledge led him to begin major research that centred upon the iconography of Cromwell. He was most notably helped by studies of costumes, and more particularly of boots, that had been carried out in English châteaux by James Ward, an artist he knew. Paul Delaroche (1797-1856) Cromwell and Charles 11831 Oil on canvas Nîmes, musée des Beaux-Arts © Photo: Florent Gardin PAUL DELAROCHE 6 8 At a time in the 1820s when the success of Troubador painters was in decline, new research was to radically change the representation of history. It was led by the painter Paul Delaroche, who became a major figure in the world of artistic creation of his time. Delaroche exposed An ailing Joan of Arc is interrogated in prison by the Cardinal of Winchester at the Paris Salon in 1824. This work marked the point where Delaroche abandoned the practices of his predecessors. Although this subject had already been addressed by Révoil and Ducis, Delaroche dispensed with their practice of using small-sized paintings and adopted large and ambitious formats instead that corresponded to the dimensions of the greatest forms of historical painting. He also introduced effects that were used in contemporary theatre, such as tightly focused compositions and highly expressive gestures. This new research reflected the European success being enjoyed by the books of Scottish writer Walter Scott. They were appreciated for their vivid and ‘local colour’ descriptions of the past and they also had an effect upon the works of historians. Prosper de Barante, François Guizot as well as August and Amédée Thierry changed the way historical research was written by writing works that were based on research into sources and memoires from the past. The works of Delaroche were strongly influenced by the history of Great Britain and he had detailed knowledge about the art forms that were used to represent national history at the end of the 18th century and that they often took the form of engravings. The historical paintings of Delaroche were immensely appreciated by his contemporaries. They included works such as Cromwell and Charles 1, The Princes in the Tower, and The Assassination of the Duke of Guise. Exhibited at the 1831 Salon in Paris, this painting took its inspiration from a scene in Shakespeare’s Richard III. Following the death of Edward IV of England, his eldest son and heir to the throne was expected to become king. But his uncle, the ambitious Richard, Duke of Gloucester, plotted to stop him being crowned. He had the young prince and his even younger brother imprisoned in the Tower of London, where both of them were subsequently assassinated. The moment captured by the artist came just before their death as the princes, realising what was to happen, cling to each other. The ray of light under the door and the dog with its ears pricked up herald the imminent arrival of visitors who may well be their executioners. Paul Delaroche (1797-1856) King Edward V and the Duke of York in the Tower of London 1830 Oil on canvas Paris, musée du Louvre, département des peintures © Rmn-Grand Palais (musée du Louvre) / René-Gabriel Ojéda CONCERNING THE PAINTING OF THE PRINCES IN THE TOWER 7 The success of Paul Delaroche’s works was accrued when they became available in the form of engravings that would lead to his works becoming known over all of Europe. The artist agreed a contract of exclusivity with engraving dealer and editor Adolphe Goupil, who began to exhibit the works of Delaroche in major European cities. He also worked with the best engravers of the time, such as Louis Pierre Henriquel-Dupont and Paolo Mercuri, who reproduced Delaroche’s best-known works. This strategy had never been used before and it resulted in The Princes in the Tower and The Execution of Lady Jane Grey being seen in numerous homes. At the same time an international clientele consisting not only of French and English buyers but also buyers from Germany and Russia was also acquiring Delaroche reproductions. The works of Delaroche thus became models of the genre that were often referred to by his contemporaries. The subject – taken from Shakespeare – of the two sons of King Edward VI of England who were locked up in the Tower of London by their uncle, the future Richard III, was particularly successful and was copied by numerous artists in Continental Europe. Others, such as Claudius Jacquard and the Dutch artist Simon Opzoomer, would later take up the theme of The Princes in the Tower and adapt it to different subjects. 9 DELACROIX / BONINGTON. AN ARTISTIC DIALOGUE 8 In parallel to the creations of Delaroche, Eugène Delacroix and the English artist Richard Parkes Bonington, both of whom were major Romanticists, became interested in the 1820s in the representation of the Middle Ages and the modern era. They met in 1825 and shared the same studio for a while, and their shared tastes led to them becoming friends. Their paintings established a veritable joint dialogue until Bonington’s premature death in 1828. 10 Eugène Delacroix (1798-1863) Louis of Orleans reveals his mistress 1825 -1826 Oil on canvas Madrid, museo Thyssen-Bornemisza © Museo thyssen-Bornemisza. Madrid. This anecdote is taken from ‘L’Histoire des Ducs de Bourgogne’ by Prosper de Barante. Duke Louis 1 of Orléans (1372-1407), who greatly enjoyed the company of women, wanted to play a trick on his chamberlain, Aubert le Flamenc, whose wife Mariette d’Enghien had become the duke’s mistress. The duke revealed a naked woman with her face hidden and asked him to judge her beauty, but Aubert did not recognise her even though she was in fact his wife. Delacroix situated this scene in an imaginary Middle Ages and recreated the spirit of that era rather than painting it in detail. He used a rich palette to create luxurious fabrics in order to reinforce the eroticism of the work. Delacroix would only rarely address the themes he and Bonington had shared after the latter’s death. They wanted their approach to be fundamentally different to those of their contemporaries and it had nothing in common with the work of the Troubadors except the use of smaller formats and, occasionally, similar subjects. History imposed itself upon their work via the prism of literature, resulting in small-sized oil paintings or aquarelles that were characterised by a liberated style and sumptuous colours. Bonington and Delacroix eschewed representations of the past for freedom of imagination and references to Venetian painters and Rubens, who they greatly admired. Delacroix was critical of the historical paintings by the artists of his time. He considered Delaroche’s success with Cromwell and Charles 1 in 1831 to be nonsensical and this inspired him to paint an aquarelle depicting his own interpretation of the scene. THE ERA OF THE ‘HISTORICAL GENRE’ 9 A new generation of artists joined Paul Delaroche in the 1830s and 1840s to establish this highly successful manner of expressing history in large formats. However – and as had been the case for Troubador painters at the beginning of the century – the critics were unsettled by these subjects, ‘borrowed’ as they were from modern history. They were also unhappy with this new way of recreating the past because, they said, it did not conform to the grand traditions of painting history. It was deemed that a new term was needed to describe it and the name chosen was ‘Historical Genre’. This genre included Paul Delaroche and those of his contemporaries who adhered to his formulas. Eugène Devéria (1805-1865) Mary Queen of Scots Receiving her Death Sentence 1826 Oil on canvas Angers, musée des Beaux-Arts © musées d ’Angers, cliché Pierre David Historical Genre works corresponded to the tastes of European collectors and it was also helped by state commissions for works to celebrate France’s national history. In the 1830s, the aim of a project designed to decorate the Apollo Gallery at the Louvre Palace was to evoke the palace’s finest hours, from its construction to the accession of King Louis-Philippe. Three paintings, by Alexandre Colin, Gillot-Saint Èvre and Alexandre Hesse, were chosen to hang in the palace. In 1833, the king created a historical museum at the Château of Versailles to celebrate “all the glories of France”. He wished to federate the people of France around a national past that reconciled all political opinion, from Clovis to The Revolution of 1830 which had swept him into power. Numerous commissions were granted to artists for this project in order to illustrate the great moments and figures of French history. 11 RECREATING THE PAST 10 The evocation of the past saw artists becoming interested in the costumes, objects and accessories of the eras that also provided the subject matter for the scenic arts of that period. Théodore Gechter (1796-1844) Richard of Warwick fighting 1844 Bronze Blois, musée du château © Photo RMN-GP - René-Gabriel Ojéda 12 The contemporary publishing of illustrated books about collections of engravings such as those of Nicolas Xavier and Camille Bonnard represented repertories of models for painters and sculptors, and they did not hesitate to consult various written works and engravings at the National Library. Museum visits, particularly visits to The Louvre and to the Army Museum with its collections of weapons and armour, were also an important source of inspiration. When Fleury Richard began a work on Queen Mathilda, the wife of William the Conqueror, he studied the engravings that were depicted on the Bayeux Tapestry, which was at The Louvre at that time. He also asked Pierre Révoil to send him his drawings of details from the same tapestry. The question of how best to represent the past was also being considered by the world of theatre in the form of the costumes worn in romantic drama productions, and painters were asked to share their knowledge of them. They included Louis Boulanger and Paul Delaroche, who collaborated with Alexandre Dumas, Victor Hugo and Casimir Delavigne. This trend also manifested itself at celebratory events, and so it was that in 1829 the Duchess of Berry organised a ball that is remembered as the ‘Quadrille of Mary Stuart’, during which each invitee dressed as a figure from the court of French king François II in costumes that had been specially designed by Eugène Lami and were based on the Renaissance period. Stanczyk (C.A. 1480-1560) was the court jester for Polish king Sigismond 1. Known for his lively wit and his lucid premonitions about the destiny of his country, Stanczyk became a symbolic figure of 19th century national culture in art and literature. This painting by Matejko was one of the first works to represent him and it contributed to the construction of Polish identity. Stanczyk was present at a ball given by the queen in 1514 to celebrate the victory of the Polish armies in Orsza over the troops of the principality of Moscow. But at the same time the loss of the town of Smolensk was very bad news that augured badly for the future of the country. Stanczyk seemed to be the only one who could see this future coming whilst the court went about its more lighthearted affairs. Jan Matejko (1838-1893) Stanczyk 1862 Oil on canvas Varsovie, muzeum Narodowe © Ligier Piotr/ Narodowew Museum – Warsaw A TASTE OF EUROPE 11 The artistic preference for representations of national history and the various forms and techniques that characterised works by French artists during the first half of the 19th century would quickly meet with considerable success beyond the frontiers of France. Paris became a destination of choice for foreign artists, who went there to complete their apprenticeships in the most reputable studios. The city offered young painters the possibility of discovering contemporary creations at the Salon, the Luxembourg Museum, which was dedicated to presenting the work of living artists, and the historical museum at Versailles. Also, French paintings became much better known from the 1830s onwards thanks to engravings. This pronounced taste for history and the national past was echoed across the whole of the European Continent at the time of the affirmation of national identities and cultures. Recently created countries such as Belgium, which gained independence in 1830, strove to affirm their existence via the arts. To celebrate independence, the young state commissioned a number of works by artists such as Louis Gaillat and Édouard de Biefve. At the same time those peoples who did not have independence, such as the Poles, whose country had been divided up in 1795 between Russia, Austria and Prussia, also found painting to be an ideal means of expressing and defending their cultures and histories, as demonstrated by Jan Matejko. For Belgium, Germany and Central Europe, the Historical Genre model – and the work of Delaroche in particular – became the model of reference, offering as it did naturalist and vividly coloured paintings that corresponded to the sensibilities of the time. Thus it was that the Historical Genre was defined as being a veritable international genre in around 1850. 13 Sir William Allan (1782-1850) The murder of David Rizzio 1833 Oil on canvas Edimbourg, Scottish National Gallery The murder of courtier David Rizzio (1533-1566) was one of the most sadly famous episodes of the reign of Mary Stuart (1542-1587). Considered to be much too close a confidant to the Queen, he was assassinated before her in her chambers at the Palace of Holyrood House in Edinburgh while she was expecting the baby who would become James VI of Scotland (James 1 of England). Among the assassins, a band of rebel Protestants led by Patrick, Lord Ruthven, was Lord Henry Darnley, her own husband, who can be seen restraining her. This choice of subject from Scottish history was partly influenced by the novels of Walter Scott. The artist also studied armour from that period as well as portraits of certain of those who were present at the scene. The chambers of Mary Stuart were represented as accurately as possible. © Scottish National Gallery ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND 14 Although the craze for illustrating the past originated in Europe, both countries had developed their own forms of representation that were linked to their own artistic, historical, cultural and social contexts. Great Britain used highly original models despite the fact that they included elements of French art. Starting from the second half of the 18th century, artists became interested in episodes from history in the context of private commissions, which came from sources such as the Shakespeare Gallery that was created by the engravings editor John Boydell and the paintings commissioned by the painter and publisher Robert Bowyer to illustrate an edition of the history of England, by David Hume. But although interest in this art form remained strong in Scotland, where Mary Stuart had been elevated to the status of a founding heroine, it began to wane in England during the first half of the 19th century, a period during which landscapes and the scène de genre were adopted as the pictorial modes par excellence. It would not be before the 1850s that a new generation of artists who had been marked by the examples of French artists began the task of reviving it. This revival led to Augustus Egg’s The Night Before Naseby, which was reminiscent of Delaroche’s Cromwell and Charles 1, that the artist had recently seen a copy of in London. A group of seven young painters then formed, calling themselves ‘The St John’s Wood Clique’, from the name of the area of London in which they lived. They offered a renewed vision of history in the style of William Frederick Yeames. ITALY The political ties linking Italy to France under the Empire and the voyages undertaken by French artists facilitated Italy’s awareness of representational models of history at the beginning of the 19th century. Ingres resided in Rome and Florence for many years, and Italian artists soon began to discover the work of the Troubador painters. It is for this reason that Italy began to witness the emergence of a pictorial current that privileged the representation of the national past starting from the 1810s. Gabriele Castagnola (1828-1883) Filippo Lippi and Lucrezia Buti 1871 Oil on canvas Private collection © Christies’ images/the Bridgeman Art Library The Florentine painter Filippo Lippi (14571504) was one of the artists who began the Renaissance movement in Italy, and he led a particularly Romanesque life according to books that were written about him. Although Lippi was a monk at the beginning of his artistic career, he fell in love with one of his models, Lucrezia Buti, a young novice in a religious order, and they subsequently ran away together. The scene chosen here by Castagnola shows their forbidden kiss in a setting that evoked a church containing numerous works of art. The two major protagonists of this Historical Romanticism, as it was called, were Pelagio Palagi and Francesco Hayez. Palagi’s method was characterised by research into old historical sources and the desire to reconstitute the past. The works of Hayez on the other hand, adopted a more political aspect that was dictated by his choice of subjects. They reflected a budding movement towards national unity, and his work displayed a unique ardour and a novel form of theatricality. This trend towards depicting the past enjoyed wide success that continued until the 1860s. 15 Eduardo Rosales (1836-1873) Don Juan of Austria introduced to Emperor Charles Quint to Yuste 1869 Oil on canvas Madrid, museo Nacional del Prado SPAIN © Museo nacional del Prado/Dist. Rmn Grand Palais / image du Prado 16 After his abdication in 1556, the Emperor Charles Quint retired to the monastery of Yuste, Spain, where he would spend the rest of his life. Once there, he asked to meet his illegitimate son and majordomo for a nobleman, Don Juan of Austria (1545-1578), and the young man would go on to have a brilliant military destiny during which he commanded the victorious fleet of the Ottoman armies at the Battle of Lepant in 1571. The artist used the example of The Assassination of the Duke of Guise by Delaroche to help him to coordinate the composition of his work. He associated this model with references from collections at the Prado Museum and Spanish artists, Greco in particular. Spanish painting at the beginning of the 19th century was strongly influenced by Francesco de Goya, whose style persuaded many other artists to try and imitate him. However, French art then began to offer the possibility of another model and this resulted in a comprehensive and formal renewal. The first painter to undergo this mutation was Federico de Madrazo, who went to Paris in 1833 to finish his apprenticeship. His perfect knowledge of French art permitted him to propose a rereading of episodes in Spanish national history that combined the recreation of the past based on the Historical Genre and references to national traditions. This is why he chose the subject matter in Gonzalve de Cordoue crosses the Battlefield of Cérignole, which was inspired by a drawing by Paul Delaroche and the composition of The Surrender of Breda, which was painted by Diego Velàsquez in 1635. Artists of the following generation in the 1860s continued to use this dual reference that combined naturalism, colour and the technical freedom of Velàzquez, who was by then a grand master of Spanish art, and the use of French models. Eduardo Rosales was a major figure of this new manner of depicting history. Jean Paul Laurens (1838-1921) The Hostages 1896 Oil on canvas Lyon, musée des Beaux-Arts © Lyon MBA/Photo: Alain Basset THE END OF THE STORY 12 The 1850s saw a decline in the fortunes of the ‘Historical Genre’ in France and the death of its principal exponents. Paul Delaroche died in 1856 and a posthumous exhibition of his work was organised at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris. An excellent catalogue of his work was also published. This catalogue was the first to be illustrated using photographic reproductions. Nevertheless, the various presentation formulas that were used during the first half of the 19th century to illustrate past history continued to influence the art of future generations, mainly because of the perpetuation of their impact in Europe but also because of the heritage it bequeathed to younger artists. One of them was Jean Léon Gérôme, who revived Delaroche with The reception of the Grand Condé by Louis XIV, a work of great emotion. Later still, Jean Paul Laurens used certain elements of Historical Genre in his work and The Hostages is reminiscent of Delaroche’s The Princes in the Tower, thus demonstrating that the latter’s work had been consigned to posterity. Despite the fact that the tradition of reproducing historical events disappeared at the end of the century, the early days of cinema perpetuated it. Indeed, one of the first scripted films, in 1908, related the assassination of the Duke of Guise and the final sequence featured a living tableau that used the themes of composition that Delaroche had used for the same subject. 17 THE INVENTION OF THE PAST - DRAWINGS BY FLEURY RICHARD SALLE DES PASTELS The acquisition in 1988 by the Fine Arts Museum of Lyon of the studio collections of the Lyonnais painter Fleury Richard that had been conserved by his descendants offered the exceptional possibility of revealing the creative processes of the artist to the public. Parallel to The Invention of the Past. Tales of heart and sword in Europe – 1802-1850 a selection of drawings is being exhibited simultaneously. The exhibition contains selected drawings from the almost six hundred works in his studio collection. 18 Fleury Richard (1777-1852) Study for The Return of Louis de la Trémoille to 1824 Sanguine on paper Lyon, musée des Beaux-Arts © Lyon MBA - Photo Alain Basset These studies reveal the artist’s preference for episodes from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance period. Although François 1 is Benighted by Bayard demonstrates his interest in France’s past, Richard also illustrated episodes from the history of Great Britain, as can be seen in a recently identified sketch – The Ring of the Count of Essex – even if it did not result in a painting. A series of three sketches allows us to follow the creative process of one of the paintings in the exhibition, The Return of Louis de la Trémoille, and they show the variations on the theme that he considered before settling on the final version. Finally, three overlay tracings can be seen at the Invention du Passé. Gothique, mon amour... exhibition that correspond to a work from the collections of the Royal Monastery of Brou in Bourg-en-Bresse – La Mort du prince de Talmont. USEFUL INFORMATION TARIFFS Exhibition: €9/ €6 /Free Entry Exhibition and Collections: €12/ €7/Free Entry Late Opening: €5/Free Entry OPENING TIMES Open from 10am to 6pm every day except Tuesdays and Bank Holidays, and from 10.30am to 6pm on Fridays Late Opening: from 6pm to 10pm on Friday May 2 and Friday June 6 2014 Press material available Please contact us to obtain access codes to our press section PRESS CONTACT Sylvaine Manuel de Condinguy Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon 20, Place des Terreaux, 69001 Lyon [email protected] Tel: +33 (0)4 72 10 41 15 MUSÉE DES BEAUX-ARTS DE LYON 20, Place des Terreaux, 69001, Lyon Tel: +33 (0)4 72 10 17 40 19 The exhibition L’Invention du Passé. Gothique, mon amour… 1802-1830 is hosted by the Royal Monastery of Brou in Bourg-enBresse, until September 21 2014. Buy your tickets in advance at www.mba-lyon.fr This exhibition has been recognised as being of national interest by the Ministry of Culture and Communication/Direction des Musées de France, and it receives exceptional state financial support. Pierre Révoil, Le Tournoi, 1812 (detail) © Lyon MBA / Alain Basset / FormaBoom Graphic Design
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz